ML20128D446

Forwards Proposal to Characterize man-made Site Design Parameters Re Missiles & Gases,In Support of Accelerated ABWR Review Schedule

ML20128D446
Person / Time
Site:	05200001
Issue date:	01/29/1993
From:	Fox J GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
To:	Poslusny C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 9302100150
Download: ML20128D446 (5)

Text

);_

]

. GE Nuclear Energy n

4

~

P (kneraliket Lompany

- 175 Costner kem.* ?,a hse. CA 9512S

~ '

January 29,1993 Docket No. STN 52-001 Chet Poslusny, Senior Project Manager Standardization Project Directorate-Associate Directorate for Advanced Reactors and License Renewal -

Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Subject:

Submittal Supporting Accelerated ABWR Review Schedule

Dear Chet:

i Encl,osed is a proposal to characterize man-made site design parameters pertaining to missiles and toxic gases.

Sincerely,

%V Jack Fox Advanced Reactor Programs

. Gary Ehlert ('GE) cc:

Norman Fletcher-L L

4).zy. y'3 L

080010

~@V 9 M 2100150930129 h

I LeoR.Anocx:os g 1

ABWR m-Standard Plant nrv n TABLE 2.01 ENVELOPE OF ABWR STANDARD PLANT SITE DESIGN PARAMETERS Basic Wing /209 km/hr ed:

Maximum Ground Water level:

Extreme Wind:

pI 177 km/hr 61.0 cm below grade N

Maximum Flood (or Tsunami) level:I I Tornado:

30.5 cm below grade Maximum tornado wind speed:

483 km/hr Maximum Rotational Speed:

km/hr Precipitation (for Roof Design):

-Translationalvelocity:

97 km/hr Maximum rainfall rate:

493 cm/hr(8)

Radius:

8 45.7 m 2

2

- Maximum snow load:

0.024 kg/cm Maximum pressure drop:'

0.141kg/cm d 2

Rate of pressure drop:

O.0846 kg/m /sec Missile Spectra:

Per SRP 3.5.1.4 Spectrum 1 -

Design Temperatures:

Soll Propertiest 2

Ambient

- Minimum Static Bearing Capacity:

732 Lg/q9) 1% Frecedence Values

- Minimum Shear Wave Velocity:

305 m/sec Maximum: 37.8"C dry bulb /25"C wet bulb Liquification Potential:

None at plant site -

(coincident),26.6 C wet bulb (non-coincident)

- resug' g from Minimum: 233"C SSE 0% Fureadance Values (Historicallimio Se3smology:

Maximum 46.1"C dry bulb /26.7"C wet bulb (coincident),2f.2 C wet bulb (non-coincident)

SSE Peak Ground Acceleration: 0.30g(S)

Minimum:-40 C

- SSE Response Spectra: per Reg. Guide 1.60 SSE Time History: Envelope SSE Response Spectra (1) 30-year recurrence interval; lue to be utilized for design of non safety-related structures only.

(2) 200 year recurrence interval; valu to be utilized for design for safety related structures only.

(3) Probable maximum flood level (PMF), as fined in ANSI /ANS 2.8, ' Determining Design Basis Flooding at Power Reactor Sites."

(

y, m g, y,, m ye,w)

~7 f

S s he Pf* '%S 0' * *O*'

Sr 10 HW (4) 10,000,000yrar tomado recurrence interval.

.mmtAwe.W W l

Hene (S) Free-field, atplant gmde elevation.

Q ra us c G saa r (6) Deleted '

(7) See item 3in Section 3A.!foradditionalinformation.

(8) Maximum value for i hour over 2.6 km# probable maximum precipitation (PMP) with ratio of 5 minutes to I hour PMP of 0.32 as found in National Weather Source Publication HMR No. 32.

Maximum short term rate: 13.7 cm/S min.

(9) This is the minimum shear wave velocity at low strains after the sollproperty uncertainties have been' applied.

2.02 Amendment 23 1

i

.~.

NM ev, n IJ 2M6100AE -

Standard Plant

i. c

_ valent static load concentrated at the impact impact the safety function of a safetyirelated o

[

. area is determined. The structural response to - systems and components will be providsd to the

- 5 this load,in conjunction with other appropriate NRC by the applicant referencing the ABWR h

design _ loads, is evaluated using an analysis. design. (See Subsection 3.5.1A). -

j i

procedute similar to that-in Reference 6 for i

rigid missiles,' and the procedure in Reference 7 33A.6 Turblee System Maintenance Progma for deformable missiles.

A turbine system maintenance program j

h 3.5.4 Interfaces -

- including probability calculations of turbine missile generation _ meeting the minimum

[

~

t 33A.1 Protection et Ultimate Heat Sink.

requirement for. the probability of missile -

l generation shall be provided to the NRC (See Compliance with Regulatory Guide 1.27-as Subsection 3.5.1.1.3).

i '

related to the ultimate heat sink and connecting conduits being capable of withstanding the 3.5.5 References effects of externally generated missiles shall be _

(

demonstrated (See Subsection 3.5.2).

- 1. - C. V. Moore, The Design of Barricades for 3

l

- Hazardous Pressure Systems, Nucleat 3.5A.2 Missiles Generated by Naturni Phenomena Engineering and. Design; Vol. 5,1967.

troen Remalader of Plant Structures, Systems and-Components 2.-- Y. Z; Moody, Prediction of Browdown Thrust

and let Forces. ASME Pubilcation 69 HT 31,_

The remainder of plant structures systems,3 Augnt 1969.

and components shall be analytically checked to -

ensure that during a site specific tornado they

3. DA.-Amirikan, Design of Protective Strue. -

f-will not' generate missiles exceeding the missiles -

tures, Bureau of. Yards and Docks, Publica.

considered under Subsection 3.5.1.4.

l tion No. NAVDOCKS P-51, Department of the Navy, Washington, D.C., August 1960.

~

[

3JA.3 Site Proximity Missiles and Alretoft -

' 4.. A. E. Stephenson, Full. Scale "'ornado Mis-l Hazards.

i.

site Impact Tests, EPRI NP 440,-July 1977, Analyses shall be' provided that d:monstrate Lprepared for Electric Power Research

- that the probability of site proximity missiles

-Institute by Sandia Laboratories.

(including aircraft) impacting the ABWR Standard Plant and causing consequences greater thpn 10CFR 5.

W. B. Cottrell and A. W. Savolainen; U. S.

i

- Part 100 exposure guidelines is.s.10I fper year.

. Reactor Containment Technology, ORNL-l (See Subsection 3.5.1.6L oWel t s.t. t -. ad NSIC 5, Vol.1," chapter 6, Oak Ridge Na-TaMa 1,o-t)

W

' tional_ Laboratory.

4 3JAA Secondary Missiles laside Contalaanant

- 6.

R. A. Williamson' and R, R. ~Alvy, Impact Protection against the_ secondary missiles.

Effect of Fragments' Striking Structural L

inside containment' described in. Subsection:

Elements, Holmes and Narver, Inc., Revised 3.5.1.2.3'shall be demonstrated.

November 1973..

t-V 7.

J. D. Riera, ion [the Stress Analysis ~of

3JAJ Impact of Wallure etNon Safety Related

Structures Subjected to Alicraft Impact Structures, Systems, and Components Due to a -_

Forces,' Nuclear Engineering and. Design, -

Design Basis Tornado

_ North Holland Publishing Co.,-Vol. 8,1968.

4 An evaluation ;of all not safety _-related 8.

De eted '

structures,~ systems, and conponents (not housed

'in a tornado structure) whose failure due to a v

~

4 design basis tornado missile that could~ adversely -

~

amendment 2$ -

- 3.5 8 c

+

v v r

wfs 4-

-s

/p mw,+

v

.t ag,r-w -+

n

-r, se v i ite, e = *

..me-s e- % w w eg g s e wr~

- si -e.v ew, r.e-.-we'

e.. w w eg.

I,.,

23A6100AB -

c

(:

4 Siandard Plani artv. c modiIsed to handle additional sensors. Chemical accidents (including chlorine)' require site specific information such as frequency, distance from control room.' and size of container. (See Subsection 6AA. ).

J Tckh 2.0-I t

=

p i

)

i-

)

i E

I:

4 l

l Amendment 23 6.4-7.11 t

1

-=

-v--

e

,-',n.-.<

w

,s v.

, yrw r

e-rwi r = +,.

w w

,