ML20128C668
| ML20128C668 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Monticello  |
| Issue date: | 07/28/1972 |
| From: | Harold Denton US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Muller D US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9212040503 | |
| Download: ML20128C668 (2) | |
Text
.
3 Distribution
-L-I L-Rdg.
JUL 2 81972 i
Docket No. 50-263 i
ENVIRON, Filt (MEPA)
Danici R. Muller. heistant Director for T.nvirontsental Projects, L RA-L RESP 0!iSES TO AGENCY CO'O'D45 DN HONT1 CELLO DRAIT LNVIRONMENTAL STAT!HNY
{
Plant nanc - Honticello i
Licensing stage - OL Docket number 263 Responsible branch - Environmental Projects Branch 73 Project leader - B. J. Youngblood Date request received by RA-L - July 20, 1972 Requested coirpletion date - July 27. 1972 Description of responso - RA-L Responses to Agency Coments on Monticello Draft Environnental Statreent i
Review status - Completed in accordance with your request, F. Congel, RA-L has responded to-the j
appropriate agency cotacents concerning the Monticello Draf t Envirooniental Stateuent. These responses are attached.
i Q
. ( (/.
f'. - {(L-;n L 'Ynn
~
.
.M.l. .. JA-L. AD /,S S-L _, \\b ' 7# # l !!Cf S$v0MaNAur > 033 54 ..Congel t mb......JKak.tn.c.r. p).yle......,.. 7/2,ffl L _ oarr> J,,/.lj/J.2... .7/4}/.72....y 7g g 72, - m.m. _,., m ~. _ _, _, _,,,,,,,,.....,,, 9212040503-720728 PDR ADOCK.05000263 p PDR L _=.. _ _ - -.. _ _ Pesponses to EPA Comments on the Monticello Draft invironnental Statement j Comment _ Pg. 7, Paragraph I (Dose Assess), lines 7-9 3ey onse Direct shine doses are very difficult to calculate and/or experimentally determine. The applicant is presently involved in a program to establish doses at the boundary due to direct shine. The Corcission will assure that the dose to individuals will be kept as low as practicabic. Comment Pg. 8, 11nos 1-3
Response
The source terms with the non-aucmented and augmented radwaste 1
systems are listed in Tables 111-1 and III-4, respectively.
Table III-3 lists only the bases for the source term calcula-tion, not the estimated stack and ground releases.
Comment Pg. 8, 1st complete paragraph, lines 3-5
[esponse It was not possible to calculate these doses since the Applicant's operating data did not include an isotopic Jisting of the noble gas releases. However, this dose will be estimated for the PTS.
Comment Pg. 8, 1st complete paragraph, lines 5-7 Reg onse The first six nonths of 1971 were devoted nostly to testing.
ne Actual operation was not begun until July 1971.
Therefore, j
the first six months of operation cortcspond to the montbs of July thru December 1971.
This will be clarified in the PLS.
4 9
1 I
4 h
,,....