ML20128C442

Rev 1 to TMI-1 Prerequisite Program

ML20128C442
Person / Time
Site:	Three Mile Island
Issue date:	05/08/1985
From:	GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20128C425	List: ML20128C420 ML20128C442 ML20128C466
References
PROC-850508, NUDOCS 8505280294
Download: ML20128C442 (23)

Text

,

m l

TM -1 PREREQU S TE PROGRAM APPENDIX NO. I P

GPU NUCLEAR CORP e303280294 esos21 PDR ADOCK 0s000289 P

PDR REVgi-M AY 8,1985

NOTE:

This Revision #1,. updates the attachment to my letter 5211-84-2029 of May 11, 1984. Changes are indicated by bars in the right hand margin.

Appendix No. 1

PfEREQUISITE PROGRAM TMI-l RESTART 1.0 PURPOSE This document describes the program used at TMI-l to identify, record and closeout prerequisites for various Management Hold Points (Flags) in the THI-l Master Restart Schedule.

It then describes in summary fashion, the general responsibilities, forms used and the major sequences tnat the program follows.

2.0 APPLICABILITY / SCOPE This document is applicable to the TMI-l plant as well as those off site Divisions supporting the Restart effort.

3.0 DEFINITIONS The following definitions are applicable to the Prerequisite Program.

3.1 F s

Management hold points within the Master Restart cne le have been termed " Flags".

The following Flag Reviews were estaolished for this program:

3.2.1 Flag No.1 - Preceeds OTSG Testing 3.2.2 Flag No. 2,- Preceeds Final Hot Functional Testing 2A, 28

& Power Operations to 48%.

3.2.3 Flag No. 3 - Preceeds Increase of Power Above 48%

3.2.4 Flag No. 4 - Preceeds Sustained Operation at 100%

Power.

3.2 Prerequisites - Prerequisites are defined as Restart required work

.tems (Hardware or Sof tware) which must be satisfactorily completed or dispositioned prior to tne Milestone (Flag) indicated.

3.3 Master Sigi Off Sheets - Attachment No. 2, is an example of the l

document used for Divisional Vice President review and concurrence witn 1) the initial Prerequisite List scope and 2) that work items within that Division's control and interest have Deen completed and/or satisfactorily dispositioned to stoport the Flag in question.

3.4 Scope Sign Off Sheet - Attachment No. 3, is an example of the document used to record the following:

3.4.1 Lead Responsiollity 3.4.2 Section ID Number 3.4.3 Section Description 3.4.4 Scope of section being reviewed 3.4.5 Signatures for 1) Review completion and 2) O&M Director concurrence that all prerequisites identified are completed.

Rev. 1 - May 8, 1985 (1) i L

J

3.5 Prerequisite Sian Off Sheet - Attachment No. 4, is an exampla tr the document used to record pr rsquisit:s for subsequent signoff when complcted.

3.6 Lead Responsibility - This term refers to the individuals or organizations wno have been assigned lead responsibility for coordinating review and prerequisite identification for a particular section in the Prerequisite List.

3.7 Caepletion - An item is complete when it has satisfied the original intent of the

item, i.e.

evaluation completed, construction completed etc.

Such an item would be signed off and dated in the " Official Field Copy".

3.8 Exception - If an item was placed in the Prerequisite List and during a subsequent reevaluation it was determined that it was not Restart required, an "E ", signature and date would be placed in the

" Official Field Copy" after O&M Director concurrence.

3.9 Deletion - An item placed in the Prerequisite List may be deleted if it was later found that the action described was a duplication or in error.

The " Official Field Copy" is updated after O&M Director concurrence.

3.10 Official Field Copy - A controlled Prerequisite List will be maintained in a three ring binder which will house all sections of the Prerequisite List as well as original signatures.

4.0 SELECTON (F COMITTEE The Restart Readiness Review Comittee (RRC) was selected by the Office of the President with consultation of the V.P.

& Director of TMI-1.

Members were selected to reflect a broad range of knowledgeable senior officials of GPUN, plus knowledgeaole persons outside of GPUN, who have had some visability of the TMI-l situation, so that tney could effectively review and probe the issues.

The members of the RRC are listed in Attachment No.

6, with a brief outline of pertinent education and experience.

5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES The below listed subsections present the major responsibilities of tnose indicated:

5.1 Restart Readiness Review Committee The Readiness Review Committee (RE) is a management tool intended to assure that:

a.

The preparations for Restart have been accomplished in a careful, thorough and prudent manner and reasonably devised to assure tnat the people, plant, facilities and procedures are in all regards in a state of readiness such that the plant will be safely started and operated.

b.

There are adequate mechanisms in place to l

identify, evaluate and address newly emerging l

items.

(

Rev. 1 - May 8, 1985 (2) i b

c.

Responsibility of members of the RRC is separate and distinct from the responsibilities the individual has in his normal assignment.

The RRC is not a mechanism for discharging those other responsibilities.

5.2 Divisional Vice Presidents - All Divisional Vice Presidents review tne Prerequisite List for completeness within tneir area of responsibility and insure that their staffs conduct proper reviews associated with Prerequisite identification.

Each Vice President also participates in final approvals and recommendations to proceed through each Flag (Milestone).

l 5.3 Vice President & Director, TMI-l The Plant Director is responsible for the overall administration of the Prerequisite Program.

Approval to seek Readiness Review Committee authorization to proceed must first be obtained from the Plant Director after satisfactory demonstration of readiness.

5.4 O&M Director.

TMI-l The O&M Director has oversight responsibility for reviewing and approving all additions and revisions to the Prerequisite List.

In addition, the O&M Director provides final sig1 off for each section located in the Prerequisite List.

This sign off will appear only after all listed Prerequisites are satisfactorily completed and/or dispositioned.

5.5 Manager of Plans & Programs Department - The Plans & Programs Department nas overall coordination responsibility which includes 1) Development of the Prerequisite List itself 2)

Maintenance of related document files and 3) Action item / status report and tracking.

5.6 Section Leads - Tnose individuals assigned lead responsibility for the various sections of the Prerequisite list are responsible for a proper review per the subject scope sheet, identification of Prerequisites and Sign Offs when complete.

6.0 PROGRAM OUTLIFE The below listed subsectons present the general sequence of the Prerequisite Program (see Attachment No.1 for Flow Diagram).

6.1 Table of Contents The first step in development of the Prerequisite List is to identify those areas / programs within various Divisions that have Restart related or other required actions to be conpleted.

These areas are evaluated by the O&M Director.

A listing is

produced, tnat represents the foundation on which to build the detailed Prerequisites.

After the list has been grouped by

Function, (i.e.,

Mods, Deficiencies, etc.) lead responsibilities are assigned.

Those assigned this responsibility, as desribed in 5.6 above, will be responsible for coordinating reviews and prerequisite identification.

The final form ' the above list will take, is the " Table of Contents".

(See Attachment No. 5)

Rev. 1 - May 8, 1985 (3) s

o

~

Scope Sheet Devaltw= ant - Each section iNotified and approved 6.2 per the Table of Contents described in secion 6.1, requires a

-Scope Sheet to be developed.

This Scope Sheet describes the review required by the lead: individual (s).

Upon completion of the subject review, sign offs are obtained from key individuals in the various organizations participating in the review.

Tnis sign off signifies a validation of the review and. agreement that the detailed Prerequisite List providedV tb.the O&M Director is consistent with the subject scope and completion and/or disposition prior to Restart is required.~

(See Attachment No. 3) 6.3 Prerequisite Identification - Given the scope described on each Scope Sheet, various evaluation meetings are conducted by key individuals in each GPUNC Organization for tDose sections in the Prerequisite List requiring sucn a group' review.

The criteria for evaluating each item at

a. typical meeting is discussed beforehand.

Those items meeting,the Restart criteria are typed on the required form (See Attachnent Nc. 4).<

After O&M Director TMI-l approval, they are inserted irko the Field Copy for subsequent sign off.-

6.4 Official Field Copy.

A controlled -field copy of the Prerequisite List is maintained in a 3 ring binder for all sign offs.

Each page of the Prerequisite List is 1) Stamped in red

" Official Field Copy" and 2) date stamped when it is placed in the book.

6.5 Sian Off Control - All Sign Offs within the Prerequisite List must ce made by 1) responsible individuals assigned 2) individuals delegated' sign off authority or 3) 7an individual who has direct control over the item in question and can properly certify its complation.

All Sign offs will be monitored by the Plans & Programs Department for adherence with the above. Signatures inust be obtained in the presence of the O&M Director or Mgr. Plans & Programs Department.

6.6 Docuraentation - The Plans & Programs Department mali

.t..s files for 1)

Prerequisite List originals 2)

L stters

_of Exceptions / Deletions on technical issues, if needed and 3) general correspondence pertaining to the pr'ogram.

An automated action items system, wnich mirrors the Official Field Copy, is also maintained.z 6.7 Operation of the Connittee (RRC) - Review by tne Committee Members individually and then in a meeting with GPUN Staff consisted of the following:

6.7.1 The proposed Prerequisite List for each Flag -

and the methods and procedures qsed to develop it.

6.7.2 Tne designation of those organizations and the position within, the organization authorized to sign off on completion of each prerequisite.

Rev. 1 - May 8, 1985 (4)

6.7.3 Review of Prerquisite Lists and questioning the Staff to test the basis for some items which had been signed off, some which have been identified as possible exceptions and the efforts. remaining to complete and sign off open items.

7.0 EETINGS The RRC met twice.before allowing TMI-l to heat up for OTSG Repair Testing in 1983; the RRC met. five (5) more times, tne most recent being May 9,1985, to assess TMI-l's readiness to go critical.

On May 9,1985 the RRC authorized TMI-l to proceed up to 48% power upon completion of those prerequisite items still open on May 9, 1985 and NRC Commission permission to proceed.

Rev. 1 May - 8, 1985 (5)

Attachment No. 1 TMI-l ESTART PREREQUISITE PROGRAM SLM4ARY FLOW CHART Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 l

l l

1 1

I I

l l

DEVELOP 1

l DEVELOP SCOPE l l

l l

l 1

It0EX AND l

l SEETS FOR I

l IDENTIFY AND l l

OBTAIN I

I ASSIGN l

l EACH SECTION I

l ECORD I

l DIVISIONAL l

m m

m l

ESPONSI-l

^l 0F THE l

^l DETAIL I

l CONCURRENCE I

^

I BILITIES l

l PREEQUISITE I

l PREREQUISITES I l

OF SCOPE l

l l

l un i

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I l

Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 I

I l

l i

I I

l I

COWLETE/

I l

PRESENT l

l RESTART l

l l

l DISPOSITION 0F I l

STATUS TO l

l REVIEW I

l PROCEED SAFELY l l

ALL I

I REVIEW l

l COMMITTEE l

l THROLGi TO I

m m

m l PREREQUISITES I l COMITTEE IN l l REVIEWS STATUS I l

NEXT HOLD l

^

^

^

l FOR SUBICT l

l FORMAL SESSION I I

AiO MAKES l

l POINT I

I FLAG l

l l

l ECO MENDATION l l

l l

(Milestone) l I

I I

I l

l n

l n

I l

l I

Loop - If additional action is required l

I I

I Require NRC Authorization to Proceed Beyond this Point (Flag 2, 2A, 28)

PL15b Rev.1 - t4ay 8,1985

n 1.~

EXAMPLE Attachment No. 2 "TMI-l RESTART READINESS" PREREQUISITE LIST MASTER SIGN OFF SHEET FLAG NO. 28 - FINAL HEATLP/ CRITICALITY l-DIVISIONAL VICE PRESIDENT CONCURFOCE 1.

The Tech Functions Division has reviewed the prerequisite listing

~ developed for Flag No. 28 and is satisfied with its completeness as it l

pertains to areas within tne Tech Functions Division's responsibilities and interests.

R. F. Wilson Date V. P. & Dir. Tech Functions Division List Attached l]l Y l[l N 2.

The Tech Functions Division has reviewed the status of prerequisites for Flag No. 28 and is satisfied that all those assigned to the Tech l

Functions Division have been completed or have been properly dispositioned as exceptions.

The signature below confirms this review of status and also signifies the Tecn Functions Division's readiness to stpport the plant through the period represented by this Management Flag.

R. F. Wilson Date V. P. & Dir. Tech Functions Division List Attached l[l Y l[l N Date placed in PRL

EXAMPLE Attachment No. 3 "TMI-l RESTART READINESS" PREREQUISITE LIST SIGN OFF SHEET FLAG NO. 2B l

o Section 6 -~0 pen Engineering / Licensing Issues o Item No. 6.5 - Open Licensing Action Items o Lead Responsibility - C. Smyth o Scope of Sign Off -

All open Licensing Action Items and commitments have been reviewed for their potential impact on Flag No. 28. All Action Items identified as l

potentially impacting this milestone have been listed on the attached prerequisite sheet.

o Signoffs - To Support l3l Flag 28 (ListAttachedlMlY l[l N) l

- Review completed, exceptions and/or prerequisites listed Licensing Date

- Exceptions dispositioned and/or prerequisites completed O&M Director Date Date Placed in PRL

EXAMPLE Attachment No. 4 "TMI-l ESTART READIESS" FLAG 2B l'Yi l

~

PREREQUISITE LIST SIGN TF SIEET FLAG 3 l-l

~

PREREQUISITES FLAG 4 l[l LICENSING ACTION ITEMS ITEM NO.

DESCRIPTION (F PREREQUISITE RESP.

SIGN W F DATE

• 06.05.39 1 Resolve Tech. Functions / Plant Comments IP/TF I

I on EP-029 I

I I

I I

06.05.40 I Certification Item #154 Resolve NRC I

TF I

l Concerns regarding tne errors associated l l

l with the instruments used to determine l

l l 250 subcooling.

I I

I I

I 06.05.41 i Final Hardware Readiness Inspection -

l NRC I

I NRC plans to inspect DG Diff & UV I

I l

relays ESAS relays and degraded grid l

I I relays prior to restart to insure l

I I

relays have been replaced or addressed i

I I

in a safe condition.

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I 1

I I

I I

I

~

l I

I I

I i

1 1

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I l

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

• EXCEPTIONS BROUGHT FORWARD DATE PLACED IN PRL FROM FLAG NO. 2A P5b

Attachment No. 5 TMI-l RESTART READINESS PREREQUISITE LIST TABLE OF CONTENTS FLAG NO. 28 - FINAL HEATLP/ CRITICALITY Responsibility Section 1 - Summary 1.l' Master Sign Off Sheets All VP's Section 2 - Plant Readiness 2.1 Systems Readiness Review Ross/Broughton 2.2 Elect, Mech Jumper, Lifted Lead Log Review Ross 2.3 Open Switching / Tagging Review Ross 2.4 Fire Barrier Seals Breach Log Review Ross/Colitz 2.5 Emergency / Abnormal Alarm Response Ross/Broughton 2.6 Surveillance Procedures Ross/Colitz

• 2.7 Transient Monitoring System is Operable Hawkins

• 2.8 RMS System Upgrade Shovlin 2.9 Combustibles Review (Walkdown)

Toole/Troffer 2.10 Process Computer Review Ross/Washick 2.12 Chemistry Program Upgrade Fuhrer

• 2.13 INPO Commitment Review Toole i

2.14 Staffing Adequate and Trained Toole/Broughton 2.15 Plant Cleanliness (Walkdown)

Toole 2.16 Removal of Temp. Lead Shielding Mehler/Capodanno

• 2.17 Loose Parts Vibration Monitoring System Operaole Orlandi i

• 2.18 Rickover Report Review Hukill l

Section 3 - Review of Work Currently in Process 3.1 Open Job Ticket Review Shovlin 3.2 M&C Mod & Maint. Support Scheduled for Month of May Toole/Langenbach 3.3 IWL's on Plant Accepted Mods Toole/Langenbach Section 4 - Prerequisite Mod / Maintenance Work 4.1 Mods to be Worked Prior to 6/1/85 Troffer/Toole 4.2 Mods in Turnover Process Troffer/Toole 4.3 Job Tickets to be Worked Prior to 6/1/85 Shovlin Section 5 - OTSG Readiness Review for Operability 5.1 GTSG Repair Readiness for Operability Colitz/Capodanno

• 5.2 TP 600/2 Approved to Test OTSG's Hawkins 1

5.3 Safety Evaluation Review Toole/Capodanno 5.4 Tech. Spec. Change Request Status Snyth/Capodanno

• 5.5 Emergency Response for OTSG Tuoe Rupture Procedures Ross i

5.6 GOR 8 OTSG Subcommittee Review Toole/Capodanno

• 5.7 Sulfur Contamination Review and Evaluation for Capodanno Total Plant

• 5.8 Results of OTSG Test and Evaluation Slear/Hawkins i

PL3

Attachment No.5 (cont'd)

TMI-l RESTART READINESS PREREQUISITE LIST TABLE OF CONTENTS FLAG NO. 28 - FINAL HEATLP/ CRITICALITY l

- continued -

Responsibility Section 6 - Open Engineering / Licensing Issues 6.1 Outstanding FQs, FCRs, ORFs and ECMs Shorts 6.2 Outstanding TFWRs Capodanno/Colitz 6.3 Outstanding Engin. Evaluation Review Colitz 6.4 Outstanding Change Mod Request Review Calitz 6.5 Review of Open Licensing Action Items Smytn 6.6 Tech. Spec. Change Status Smyth

• 6.7 Outstanding Emergency Plan Items Rogan l

• 6.8 Drawing Update Status Langenbach l

• 6.9 Hanger Check Program / Systems Balance Piazza i

6.10 Misc. Engineering / Maintenance Toole/Langenbach Section 7 - Outstanding Deficiency Reviews

• 7.1 Startup Problem Reports Hawkins l

7.2 M4CRs, QORs, RDNs, Audit Findings Ballard/Toole/

Short 7.3 RORs and RIRs Kuenn 7.4 Restart Validation Problem Reports Ballard

'*7.5 Post Mod Turnover Package Review Ballard l

Section E - Startup & Test Group Readiness 8.1 Test Instrumen./ Equipment for Support of Flag No. 2B Hawkins 8.2 Test Procedures (TP) Approved to Support Flag No. 28 Hawkins

• 8.3 Functional Mod Tests Scheduled as part of the test Hawkins l

Program.

8.4 Training / Dry Run for Restart Hawkins 8.5 SU/ Test Manpower Requirements Review Hawkins i

I

• Item Completed in prior Prerequisite Flag l

[

Page 1 of 3 EADIESS EVIEW COMITTEE EMERSHIP EDUCATI(M/ EXPERIENCE NAE / TITLE EDUCATION EXPERIENCE P. R. Clark - GPUNC

-Bachelor of Civil Enginering-Cum Laude

-Associate Director Reactors, Naval Reactors President GPUNC Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn Division, U.S. Dept. of Energy Chief Reactor

-Graduate Study in Civil Engineering Engineering Division; Nuclear Power Directorate, Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn Naval Sea Systems Command, Department of the Navy,

-Oak Ridge School of Reactor Tech.

in which position he directed a major element of the U.S. Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program; Retired l

U.S. Government.

4

• R. C. Arnold - GPUNC

-B.S., Science / Engineering University

-Sr. Vice President, Metropolitan Edison Co. & Vice Former President of Michigan President GPU Service Corp.; Vice President -

GPUNC Generation, GPU Service Corporation; Vice Presi-1 dent - Generation, Met Ed Co.; U.S. Navy Lt.

(On Committee thru Commander USS Long Beach, Main Propulsion Assistant 11/25/83) responsible for Operations and Maintenance of a two reactor nuclear propulsion plant.

H. D. Hukill - GPUNC

-B.S., Naval Academy

-Department of the Navy Senior Civilian Special V.P. & Director,

-Naval Nuclear Power Training Assistant to the Commander Naval Sea Systems Com-1 TMI-l mand; Burns & Roe Inc., Project Operations Manager, Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant Project; Retired Navy after 22 years,17 of which were involved in Construction, Maintenance and Operations of Nuclear Submarines. He spent 4 years as the Senior Naval Officer Special Assistant to the Director of the Navy's Nuclear Propulsion Program.

R.L. Long - GPUNC

-P.H.D., Nuclear Engineering

-Chairman, Dept. of Chemical & Nuclear Engineering, V.P. Nuclear Purdue University Professor of Cnemical & Nuclear Engineering, Assurance Division

-M.S., Nuclear Engineering University of New Mexico; Associate Reactor Engi-Purdue University neer, Indian Point Nuclear Plant; Research partici-

-B.S., Electrical Engineering pant in tne field of Fast Burst Reactor, Sandia Bucknell University Corp.; Research Associate, Nuclear Research Division, Atomic Weapons Research, Aldermoston, l

Berkshire England.

1 PLl4b

o Page 2 of 3 READIESS REVIEW CODNITTEE EleERSHIP EDUCATION / EXPERIENCE NAE / TITLE EDUCATION EXPERIEICE R. F. Wilson - GPuro

-M.S., Meenanical Engineering

-Manager of Manufacturing Engineering with Offshore V.P. Technical University of Michigan Power Systems, Inc., two proposed Nuclear Plants to Functions Division

-B.S., Mechanical Engineering be Duilt off the N.J. Snore; Chief Program Engineer University of California at Berkeley on the Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Program

-Nuclear Engineer / Reactor Technology, for Atomic International.

Oak Ridge School of Technology R. W. Heward, Jr. GPUNC -B.S., Swarthmore College

-Cnief Naval Nuclear Engineer, New York Shipbuilding V.P. & Rad Environ.

-Oak Ridge School of Reactor Tech.

Corp; GPU Service Corp., Safety and Licensing Division Manager; Project Manager Forked River Project; Project Manager Three Mile Island; Manager of Nuclear Projects.

• S. Bartnoff - GPUSC

-PHD, Physics

-President and Chief Operating Officer Jersey l

Exec. V.P. - Elect Massachusetts Institute of Tech.

Central Power & Light Co.; Manager of Engineer-I Operations

-M.A. Physics ing, GPU Service Corp; Manager Nuclear Fuels Syracuse University Division, GPU Nuclear Power Activities Group; (On Committee thorugn Advisory Engineer, Westinghouse Atomic Power 6/6/84)

Division.

I. R. Finfrock, Jr.

-8.S., Electrical Engineering

-Vice President & Director Oyster Creek Plant; General Office Drexel Institute of Technology Vice President, Generation JCP&L; Manager of Review Board (GOR 8)

-International School of Nuclear Nuclear Generating Stations JCP&L; Manager of Chairman Science and Enginering -

Safety & Licensing GPU Nuclear Power Activities.

Argonne Laboratories T. L. Gerber - Outside -PHD, Meenanical Engineering

-Executive Vice President-Structural Integrity GORB Memoer Stanford University Associates, San Jose Calif.; Senior Consultant,

-M.S., Mechanical Enginereing S. Levy Inc., Campbell California; Subsection Stanford University Manager / General Electric Co., San Jose, Calif.

PLl4b

4 Page 3 of 3 fEADIESS HEVIEW C01441TTEE EMBERSHIP EDUCATION / EXPERIENCE NAE / TITLE EDUCATION EXPERIENCE

• oJ.L.C. Bachofer

-B.S., Mechanical Engineering Director-Special Projects, GPUNC; Director-Het Ed Lehigh University-Generation Maintenance, GPUSC/NC; Director, V.P. Generation

-General Electric Co. BWR Technology Generation Operations GPUSC; Assistant Project Short Course Engineer - TMI-2, Met-Ed; Station Engineer /

Superintendent, Met-Ed.

• No Longer a Committee Member

• • Replaced S. Bartnoff on Committee i

t

i Page 1 of 7 FLAG NO.1, EETING NO.1 ATTEIGANCE Committee Members Present Others Clark Adamiak Arnold Toole Hukill Kintner Long Colitz Finfrock Ba'. lard Bartnoff Fenti Wilson Hawkins Gerber Niedig Kuehn (Acting) for Heward Croneberger Keaten Slear Langenbach Broughton Troffer Faulkner Smyth Carroll Christman Place:

Unit 1 South Auditorium Date:

July 26, 1983 Duration: 7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br />

s Page 2 of 7 FLAG NO.1, IEETING NO. 2 ATTDMNCE Committee Members Present Others

. Clark Adamiak Arnold Toole Finfrock Colitz Toole (Acting for Hukill)

Ballard Keaten (Acting for Wilson)

Fenti Kuehn (Acting for Heward)

Hawkins Gerber LangenDach Bartnotf Niedig Long Slear Broughton Troffer Faulkner Smyth Croneberger Carroll Christman Place:

Unit 2 Admin Building Date:

August 19, 1983 Duration: 5.5 Hours i

Page 3 of 7 FLAG NO. 2, EETING NO.1 ATTDOANCE Committee Members Present Others Clark Adamiak Hukill Toole Long Colitz Kuehn (Acting for Heward)

Niedig Keaten (Acting for Wilson)

Faulkner Bartnoff Croneberger

'Finfrock Slear Gerber Langenbach Smyth Hawkins Carroll Ballard Fenti Christman Shorts Place:

TMI Training Center Date:

October 20, 1983 Duration: 7 Hours

I Page 4 of 7 FLAG NO. 2, EETING NO. 2 ATTEMANCE Committee Menbers Present Others Clark Adamiak Finfrock Toole Gerber Slear Wilson Shorts Hukill Hawkins Long-Colitz Kuehn (Acting for Heward)

Troffer Bartnoff (Not Attending)

Faulkner Farr Carroll Christman Fidler Croneberger Smyth Place:

TMI Training Center Date:

December 20, 1983 Duration: 6.5 Hours

(

.-,.--n,--

Page 5 of 7 R.AG NO. 2, EETING NO. 3 ATTDCANCE Committee Members Present Others Clark Adamiak Finfrock Teole Gerber Colitz Keaten (Acting for Wilson)

Troffer Hukill Kintner Long Broughton Heward Slear Bartnoff Snorts Fenti Neidig Hawkins Carroll Kuenn Smyth Place:

TMI Training Center Date:

January 12, 1984 Duration: 6 Hours i

L

Page 6 of 7 FLAG NO. 2A, EETING NO.1 ATTENDANCE Conedttee Members Present Others Clark Adamiak Finfrock Toole Gerber Colitz Wilson Troffer Hukill Slear Kazanas (Acting for Long)

Hawkins Kuehn (Acting for Heward)

Carroll Bartnoff Smyth Faulkner Croneberger Place:

Unit 2 Admin Bldg.

Date:

June 6, 1984 Duration: 4 Hours

a Page 7 of 7 FLAG NO. 28, EETING NO.1 i

ATTDOAEE Committee Members Present Others Clark Adamiak Finfrock Shorts Gerber Troffer Wilson Croneberger Long Kuehn Hukill Ballard Heward Langenbach

• Bac.hofer Meyer Smyth Neidig Brougnton Faulkner Carroll Hawkins Colitz Toole Hammond Place:

TMI-1 Trailer #202 Date:

May 9, 1985 Duration: 5.5 Hours

• Replaced Bartnotf who retired in early 1985.