ML20128B802

Discusses Review of Corrective Actions for Anomalies Identified in Inservice Testing Program at Plant.Table Detailing Anomaly,Response & Status of Each Item Encl

ML20128B802
Person / Time
Site:	Summer
Issue date:	01/28/1993
From:	George Wunder Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Skolds J SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS CO.
References
TAC-M83397, NUDOCS 9302030179
Download: ML20128B802 (14)

Text

i

!\\

(

f[

),,

UNITED STATES y

• * ~ ~

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION E

o g

t WASHINoTON. D. C. 20S$5 January 28, 1993 Docket No. 50-395 Mr. John L. Skolds Vice President, Nuclear Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station P.O. Box 88 Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065

SUBJECT:

REVIEW 0F CORRECTIVE ACTIONS FOR ANOMALIES IDENTIFIED IN INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM - VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT No. 1 (TAC NO. M83397)

By letter dated October 16, 1991, the staff issued its Safety Evaluation Report (SER) on your Inservice Testing Program (IST).

The conclusion of this SER was that your IST would be acceptable once certain anomalies were addressed.

By letter dated April 16, 1992, you submitted a supplementary response that addressed these anomalies.

The staff has reviewed your response and has concluded that your actions resolve the anomalies with the following exceptions:

(1) Anomaly No. 1 - A new or revised relief request with additional basis for staff review is needed if the proposed modification to increase the accuracy of the calculated pump flow rate will not meet the accuracy requirements of Table IWP-4110-1.

(2) Anomaly No. 8 - Since you have indicated that valve XVC-8046 is passive, but will be infrequently used, you should review this classification against IWV-2100(b).

If the valve is classified as passive, you should verify its closure following any actuation of the valve.

(3) Anomaly No.17 - Since IWV-3410 applies to Category B valves, your response conflicts with page 27 of 34 of ISI Valve Test list, GTP 302, Revision 4, which shows the valves in question to be Category C.

You should address this anomaly in the next 10-year update.

010015 r

1 h

j 9302030179 93o12e PDR ADOCK 05000395 PDft p

-January.2.8. 1993 v

The enclosed table details, for_ each anomaly identified in our Obtober 16, 1991=,_SER,.the anomaly, your response, and the status'of_the-item.-This completes the staff's action on TAC _ No. M83397.

Sincerely,-

ORIGINAL SIGNEDY BY:

George F. Wunder,LProject Manager Project Directorate 11-1,

-Division of Reactor Projects - 1/11-Office of Nuclear Reactor. Regulation-i

Enclosure:

Inservice Testing Program Table cc w/ enclosure:

See next page i

DISTRIBUTION NRC & Local PDRs PD 11-1 Reading File S. Varga G. Lainas E. Adensam G. Wunder S. Little OGC ACRS (10)

L._Plisco, EDO E. Merschoff, R-II LA: k3 P.M PM:PD21;DRPE 0:hl:DRPE' 0" 3 CE PAndYrs GWurf[hh,M

'EAcfdam WE wtE i/2$/93 i o / /[h/93 l /3.i/93 Document Name:

SUM 83397.LTR

'- s-Mr.-John L.i Skolds Virgil C. Summer Nuclear StationL South. Carolina Electric & Gas Company CCf Mr.:R. J. White Nuclear Coordinator S.C. Public Service Authority c/o Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station-Post Office Box 88.(Mail Code 802)

Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065 J. B. Knotts,-Jr., Esq..

Winston & Strawn Law Firm

'1400 L Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. _20005-3502 Resident Inspector / Summer NPS c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission-Route 1, Box 64 Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065 RegionalEAdministrator, Region 11 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, N.W., Ste. 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Chairman, Fairfield County Council Mail Drawer 260 Winnsboro, South Carolina 29180 Mr. Heyward G. Shealy, Chief Bureau of Radiological Health South Carolina-Department of-Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 Mr. R. M. Fowlkes, Manager Nuclear Licensing & Operating Experience South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station-Post Office Box 88 Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065 L

I

TABLE 1 Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Inservice Testing Program Status of Anomalies Cited in SE Dated October 16, 1991 Anomaty Ntaber Description of Anomely Licensee's Response to Anomaly Remaining Action w

1 The licensee regassted relief (telief Request A.1) from Virgit C. Summer aucteer Station A relief regaaet with measuring bearing temperature, intet pressure, and (VCSNS) comot currently meet the additienet besla for utC' differential pressure on the dieset generator fuel oil accuracy regairements of IWP-3110-1 review is neceeeery.if 1

trenefer gumps and proposed to measure pump flois rate and for the calculated flow rate of the modification as proposed vibration once por month and to assion administrative dieset generator fuel of t transfer for the calculated flow timits for pump flow rate. The licensee's proposed pumps because of the limited raaber rate will net meet the corrective action acceptance criteria are unacceptable of measured parameters evettable accuracy regsf rements of since they could attow the play to degrade to less than one and the tolerance attowed for these fable t w -4110-1.

hotf normat capacity before requiring corrective action.

perameters. Therefore, VC$ms wilt Relief wee granted provided the calculated flow rate meets implement a modification (s) to the accuracy requirements of Table IWP-4110-1. Relief was increase the occuracy of the not granted to use the proposed acceptance criterie. The calculation flow rate. The licensee should establish flow rate reference values and sedification(s) will be implemented use the acceptance criterie of Section XI, Table spon completion of design approvat IWP-3100-2.

and during en outsee of sufficient time for instattation prior to the end of Refuet Outage 7.

The flow rate reference values and acceptance criteria will be in accordance with febte t w-3100-2. -

m._

Q:

J. -k yi j:, If

~

Anomety

+

8kaber Description of Anaesty Licenseede Response to Anomsty Remaining Action 1,

~ 2 The licensee respeeted retlef (Retief negseste s.3 and E.1)

VCsus wilt develop insitu soap me further action le--

1 from estaMiehlve fleed reference values for flew and curves for each pep to evolunte regsfred. The.

d;fferentist pressure for their service and chitted meter the flew vs. differentist preneure implementation of.

pimps and to use paap curves to coopere flew and perfemance of the gesp. Atee, licensee's commitment.

different$@st poensure.

Acceptance criteria beoed on the vibration reference date will be should be complete et shle curve absidd met eenfilet with Technicet specification er' cettected such that acceptance flee and is se W est to a t

'}

Facility Safety anetysle Report operability criteria.

criteria for vibratian measurements inspection..

i Since the teuets of vihrotten ser very significantly wilt give esysivetent protection as i

depending en edlere the pg is operating rotative to the.

provided by the tede.

i-s pimp ourwe, e set of vibretten reference values usutd have te be estaMiehed for each somp curve used that sive -

l ogstwetent protection as provided by the Cede. Relief uns granted provided (1) the insitu pamp curves are doveteped, ji er annufacturers curves are welidated, when the pimp le knenen to be aparating acceptably, se described in the TER ettached to the SE dated October 16g 1991, and (2) i acceptance criteria for vibration asseuremente give.

i ogsivetent pre'ection as provided by the cause.

t j

3 h licensee resposted retlef teetief negaaet E.2) from the VCsus has completed a modification-se further action is N

atteusbie rense regsfrasents of section XI for flow and:

editch instetted the Individset,

regsf red.

f differentist pressure asseuremente en their service unter header flem metere IFE-4506 and-pesos and preposed to estaMish expanded ranges to 1FE-45ST and, therefore, etteinsted "t

accommodate added instrument errore.'F h ticensee did not the need for a relic

• tespost.

3 i

demonstrated that the preposed acceptance criterie witt..

WCSes withdrew Rettet Respost E.2.

?

sive adespote ensurance of gesp eperationet readinado edien '

,l applied to their pamp test parameter welues daring teetleg.

Service esoter system Pale dated 3/13/09, eheme a flew element and indiceter instetted in each service water

~

2 heeder such that eech heeder can be footsted, or aptit if

_.f operated in perettet, and individaat pimp flew rates con be obtelned.' since the licensee did not show that using the Code specified acceptance criteria is'lapracticet _or that I{

lt leposee en escessive herdship without a campensating

- benefit to eefety, and eince the licensee *e proposed etternative Jid not provide a reasonable alternettve to the Code requirements, relief isos not granted as respoeted.

j t

i d'

e**~

t L. $

i r a

-t 4

wt y.ye

<e r

i r

y

~w "r'-

r m

t wn

,ev

-,... + - *

• i

=w we

Anamely musber Description of Anomaly Licenseets Resoonse to Anomaly Remaining Action

-4 The licensee requested relief tRelief Request D.1) from the The VCsas' basis for the proposed no further action is regJirement of Section XI to measure flow rate of the alternettve testing in Relief required.

chergirg 3say ared proposed to measure flow rate daring RegJest D.1 models the esception to refuellsg outages. The proposed atterretive had not been cyaerterly futt flow testing shown to provide en acceptable tevet of quotity and safety described in Generic Letter (CL) aruf relief frts: the Code requirmeners was not granted.

89-06, Position 9.

Therefore, this exception to the Code vitt be The Licermee should continue to measure pump flow rate documented in the program using GL quarterly. The licensee should also perform the flow test 89-04 as the justiffretion.

daring refuellrg outage *Aen a futt flow path to the RCS is eveitable and comply with the Code instrument accuracy.

p requiremente. If the licersee detemines that the ccde flow rate instrument accuracy or ecceptance criteria

}

regairements cannot be met durire quarterly testing, the licensee should request relief from these re wiremente and e

t justify their proposed alternatives. The licensee should i

speelticstly address the individJet instret and total loop accurecies and show that the proposed testing will give adegante assurance of pap operationet readiness armi provide a reasonable alternettve to the Code regairemente..

a

,n Anomet y Number Description of Anoasty Licensee *s Response to Anasmuty Remeinine Action E

5 In the Licensee's preerem for testing volves, en p.13, Generel Test Procedure (GTP) - 302 no further action is Persoraph 6.2.4, GTP-392, a fottomine statement is made:

has been cl'ensed to etteinote the reorited.

"If a penser aparated votwe felts to exhibit the required 24 L,urs deter for doctorine e charge of welw seen er disk positten or exceeds its vetve inoperetde ahn the otroite maaleen elleend stroke time by this testirg, corrective time fette into the regstred action acties will be feltieted lamediately. If the test rarge.

deficiency le not, or cannet be corrected within 24 twirs, the volve will be emetered inaperable.'

This statement conftIcts with GL 39-04, Position 8, which states.

... It is the staff's peeltlen that es soon es the este is recaydsed as belag within the seestred Ac-len Renee for peeps or enceeding the tietting value of futt-stroke ties for votwee, the==-lete compenaret must be doctored insperable and the Tecinicet Specificetten Action 1

i time maast te eterted.' In other words, if a velve faits to embibit the reesired change of stess or disk position or exceeds its specified timiting vetun of futt-streite time, it mast be doctored insperside lamedietsty, not efter 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. The licensee should revloed the IST progree to agree with this stoff position.

'1 I

6 GTP-302, Attachment Vll, istne C, p.1 of 1 Hemina Streite GTP-302, Attoclument VII, has been he further action is l;

Time Detensination, preser*ts guidance that any be used to revised to reflect GL 39-06, regsired. IST calculate maalass stroke tiese for pouer operated vetwes.

Position 5.

A revies., erei update taptementing proce hsres This Table does not appeer to eset the guidance presentW If necessery, of att velve IST ere e4 ject to mac in GL 39-04, Positten 5.

Att volves with nominst futt-taptementing precedures uitt be inspection.

stroke times greeter then 2 seconds could howe c'roite times made to ensure eccepterice criterie that onceed the tielts of Section XI, Peregraph IW-are in accordance with EL 39-C&,

3413(c), by a terse margin before exceeding the calcuteted Position 5, as part of die second easiensa timiting value of futt-stroke time. The Wirused 10 yeer intervet.

operationet readiness of ery volve would be gaec, amelde O that vetwe's full-stroke time deia;ted, as altamed br falde C, seen compare $ to the streite time of ther previous test.

The licensee should revise Table C to estatdish the semimer value of timiting stroke time for power operated wet,er in accordance with the guidance.nresented in GL 89-04, Position 5.

Corrective action sisatd be taken es described in the *stitustes of 15e P4 tic Nwetire e Generic letter 89-04, response to question 34.*

1 I

a

.~

I Ancesty

{

skaber Description of Anomaly Licensee's Response to Anempty Romeinine Action 7

The ilicensee respsested relief (Relief Reapest E.2) to test WCses withdrew setlef aespaest E.2 no further action is worious wetwee ehrig cold shutdooms ashen these wetwes arui mitt replace it with a cold required.

}

caroust he tested sporterly durirg power operation. This shutdann justification.

retlef rep is essenceeeery because section II, Pereeraphs WMit end -3522, specifica'ty ettow velve testig to be du$ erred to cetd shutdoom if testire is i

lepractiest ecles power operation. The licensee should

{;

delete th9e retlef respasst and include the infonmotion cantoisend le the Alterviste Test, editch espleins how cold j;

ebutdesse testig will be consbacted.

5 It is tsiclear how twworse flow closure of Catevery A/c vCses withdrew metlef secasest m.2 since the licensee hee chech wetves NUC-M41, -7544, -3066, -8061, and -8947 is for EvC-7541 and-EvC-7544. These indicated that wetve i'

worified each cold shutdanos. These vetwee eight be wolves are cteesified es onesive EvC-8046 is possive but l

worified to be in their steeed eefety fimetion position by wetwee and per the direction of will be infreepsetty named, a teek rete test, such as Appendix J, Type C.

newever, tw-3700 enty require teoksee the ticense shouto review this is unustly perfonmed only charity reactor refuetire testicas en a 24 eent6 Intervet.

this eteselfleetion outasos. This test frequency does not meet the Section II seeinst tw-2100(b). If respirements. The licensee should justify a test intervet vetwo twC-8066 is a normally clesed the watwe is cteesified as beyond thet ettewed by the Code in a relief recpaest or test wetve idiose oefety positters is else possive, the licensee these wetwes in accordance with the Code test frespaency closed eruf ednich is rarely used should verify its closure respirements. If cleeure testire is done et cold shutdoom,

(*11) la eettirg tap to the MT.

followieg any actuation of the test eheutd be described in the cold shutdoom This velve will be recteesified es this velve.

Justificetlen.

e peseIwe wetwe thereby onty regairfrg a teekese test be perfenmed Vetwes EvC-M 61 and IWC-8G47 are ctessified es active wolves and will contieuse to receive a closure test each epsorter orul a teekese test each outage (524 months) es resquired try section IW.

L 4

6 1

~~

Ancunety hatser Description of Anomaly Licensee's Responst to Anomely Reunining Action 9

N tieermee resposted relief Caetief neg.sest u.3) from the VCsus withdrew netlef meiwest u.3 ao further action is Code test dets trendity and increened test frecpency for vetwos MVS-0001 A & S and Iv5-respired.

corrective actlen respirements for Category A reactor 0002. & 5.

WCsus* testing of buildisq pwge engyty, IVB-0001A and -00015, and par 9e these vetves is in accordance with endienst wolves, -9302A and -0002s. These volves wit 1 be the provisions of GL 39-06, lack rete tested seery 6 eonths p. plant Technical Position 10, and will be hmted specifteetions. The combined teekage rate ottoised for both as such in the IST program.

vetwee ogsels the Technical specification tioit for each volve, 3620 cc/ min.

This retlef respeet is tamecessary. N Code respires these volves to be teek tested every two years. The ticensee is conservettwely teek testirg them every sia months. ' The ticonsee proposed not to tresul teekage.

Trending of conteirment isolation vetwe teekage rates per IW-3427(b) is esempted by GL 39-04, Position 10. Relief is not rogsested from IW-3426 and -3427(a). The respost indicates thet these volves are teek tested individhmity and the test roeutts are cambined ord compared conservatively to the teek rate huit septicatde to either vetwo. Therefore, this relief respost may be withdream and couptiance with GL 89-06, Position 10, indicated in the program.' If retlef is needed for reesans not addressed above, the request should be revised er** reenheitted.

10 In Cold shutdann Justifications ts-CC-1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 The cold shutdown justifications no further action is the licensee proposed testing the volves, EvC-9570, have been revised to remove the recpired.

-9602, -9632, -9633, tvs-9568. -9600, -9605 -9606, hetf pipe reference, thereby

-9625, -9626, and xvT-8102A, 3, and C during cold shutdoisis increesing the test frespency to uhen the reactor coolant pumps are secured et RCS betf pipe every cold shuteme, an intervet fitt conditlans. These cold shutdonari jtstifications are that complies with Code e.snacceptable since this plant condition will not occiar each requirements.

cold shutemesn; the test intervat could be as tone as between refueling autoges and not in accordance with the Code test frespency requirements. The licensae should provide a retlef request that addresses and justifies this extended test interval in the 1s1 progeam or test these vatwes in accordance with the Code test frequency regelrements.

l 4

s ;

l AnameIy humber Descripticri ef Ancsusly Licensee's Response to Anansty asesining Action 1

11 The licensee included pressurizer musillery sprey volve vcsss incttsied vetve xvC-a377 in me further ection is XYT-8145 in the IsT program and proposed to test it chrire the ist valve Test List es part of recesired.

cold shutdsiets. This proposet is acceptable. However, the Revision 4 to GTP-302 and currently downstream eheck velve 83TT is not in the program. This tests the volve in accordance with check velve saast las included in the program if credit is the provisions of the Code.

taken for the aparationet readinese of the pressurizer autitlery aprey flow path because it mart change position to permit flow in the line. The licensee should review the safety-related fisiction of this velve and revise the Isf program to inctssie this velve es recessary.

12 The licensee stated in the 1st valve Test List, p. 7 of 33, vtsas determined that vetwe xvC-so further action is that the oefety positicri of vetve IWC-8440, woltme controt 8440 is not regJired to perform a recpaired. Is! program tank outlet check, is closed and that the valve is beire specific furction in shutting down secpe is sc.6 ject to WRC futt-stroke esercised quarterly. This does not appear to the reactor to cold shutdown or in inspection.

be the case because the motor-operated voltme contret tank mitigating the consetpaences of an ustlet vetves teatream of this check vetwe are being futt-occident and, thus, should not be stroke exercised during cold shutchuns. The licensee included in the Isl vetve program.

should verify the testing frequency of vetwe XVC-8440 and vetve xvC-8440 was renowed from revise the 15T program as necessary.

GTP C 2 in Revision 4 13 Dieset generator system drawing no. 1Ms-22-006 was not aevision 4 to CTP-302 indicates so further action is evoilable for review. A ceeptete evaluation of the dieset that ett the velves listed in regst red.

generator erstem ecomponents that snould be included in the drawing no. 145-22-006 are beine 157 program eruf the testing of tfiose componsists was not tested cyaerterly as active valves.

performed. Additlenetty, 20950A, e vetve number Listed on WCsus is confident that these page 9 of 33 in the Ist Velve Test List, appears to be a vetves are in compliance with Code typographicot error. The licensee should ackfress this requirements. Also, the vetwe inconsistency.

listed as 10950s esos corrected to reed 20950g in eevision 4

.~

Anomeiy sksuber Description of Anomety Licensee *s Response to Anomety Remaining Action to In Relief secassets C.7, C.8, K.1, and K.3, the Licensee VCsus' disasseety and inspection no fwther action is recpassted relief freau exercising several check vetwee program for check volves is in regaired.

wwdisg to time Section XI test frequency erui seethod accordance with E 89-06, Position recpstremange apud proposed to disassete and inspect than 2, and, thus, provides a reesonable durire refug(log optages.

etternettwo to fuit flow testing.

WCSus will clarify the reestred Diseeeeably and inspection should only be used to manuelty corrective actions applied to a esercise cdieck volwec open and/or shut e en futt forward vetwe irspection failure e en the flow or rwwerse flew testing is impractical. This program is quieted for the second prMaro has some risks, dich may make its routine use 10 year intervet.

andesirable.

The tIconese shoutd octivety pursue the use of atternete testing methods to futt-stroke enecise these vetwes, such es ruuvintruelve diagnostic technlipses to d==anstrate dether the vetwe disk swings futty open during partiet i

fIou testirg or ctosed den f1ou has consed. E en vsIwe operationet readiness carnot practically be determined by observation of system perummeter, inspection may be used es an a1ternetive; however, the tIconsee shoutd perforie post maintenance testine (e.g., forterd flow and reverse flow cloeure eng=hltity) prior to returnire a velve to service following the disassembly and Inspection procedJre.

The licensee's proposed disassembly and inspection program 1s not thoroughty stated and does not include corrective action (s) that will be taken if a volve falls the Inopoetion. A determinetton that the proposal provides a reesanable alternettve to the Code recpsirements cannot be ande. Nousever, a check vetve inspection program performed In accordance with E 89-06, Position 2, can adequately j

determine velve condition and provides e reesonable alternative. Therefore, relief was granted provided the licensee performs check volves disassembly and inspection per E 89-06, Position 2.

15 In Eelief Recpaest J.$ the licensee requested relief from VCSNS meets the requirements of E to further action is i

esercising the accumstator discherpe check volves according 89-06, Position 1, with respect to regaired.

to the Section XI test method and frequency requirements, the e n==tator discharge check The licensee proposed to tutt-stroke exercise the vatwes valves, by performing a futt flow daring refuetine outages using an acoustic technique.

test each refueling.

Retief was granted provided the licensee complies with E 89-04, Position 1..

~.

- 1

1 i

1 i

1

[

Anomaly 1.

kaber Description of Anoasty Licensee's Response to Anomaly Remaining Action 1-i 16 In Cold shutdomen Justification CS-SI-5, the licensee should If possible, the IST progrme mitt to further action is 1

verify that the proposed futt-stroke exercise test of be revised prior to the end of required.

j-valves ivc-89734, -89738, -8973C, -8974A, and -89745, lone Refueting 7 to test these vetwes in i

Had SI header citacits, meets CL 89-04, Position 1, and that accordance with GL 89-04, Position the vetwas are helrg individustly futt-stroke e.nercised 1, by the use of non-intrusive even with the paretlet flow paths.

verification of votwe position. If this method cannot be established, j-then the vetwes mitt be tested in w w A ie with CL 89-04, Position 2.

t 1

17-Simple check vetves that serve a ve== breaker fmetion WCSus has verified that vetwes Xvv-Since IW-3410 applies to t

are to be tested gaerterly, if practical, in A h e 3014 4 & 8 are not simple checit Cateoory a valves, the with the requirements of Section XI, Peregrasei IW-3520, vetwes, but are wolves specificatty licenmee's response is i

for Category C chedt velves. The licensee should review manufactured as vacassa breakers.

uncteer to the staff. Ttie t

the design and testing of vetwes 3014A and 30148 using this As such, the program does correctly licensee should adet-ess t

guidance, specify the Code requirements of this comment in the nemt TW-3410 to be applied to the to yeer igdete.

testing of these velwes.

The licensee incorrectly listed the tocation of check This valve has been removed by a no further action is 18e volves 64895 in tk ISI vetwe Test List. ' The location plant modification.

regsired.

should be Dus. 842, Cord. C-8.

j t

-18b The Licensee categorized vetves XWC-7541 erui -7544 es The cold shutdoun justification has no further action is 1

Category A/C in the 851 Velve Test List but incorrectly been corrected.

ressired.

i categorized them os Category C in Cold Shutdoun s

Justification CS-AC-2.

a t

18e The licensee incorrectly categorized vetwes NCV-96804 and -

The relief ragsest has been so further action is

%808 as Category A/C in mellef aegsest A.1.

Ackfitionally, corrected.

regsired.

this relief regsest is incorrectly identified as A.5.

18d The licensee incorrectly listed the tocation of volve svi-CTP-302 has been corrected.

so further action is I

8104 in the ISI valve Test List. The locatiert should be regstred.

Dus. 675, Cord. C-4.

'18e The licensee incorrectly listed the tocation of waive IWC-ETP-302 has been corrected.

no further action in 1

8348C in the 151 vetwe Test List..The tocation should be regsired.

Dug. 673, Cord. G-14 t '

1 l

i r

P-y y

• w

-.-+9 e

<-?

• d 4^*-

h--"y---i

• -rv-s

-'MM+

t-e-wyegr ynt -

e+=eg

-iwr T1'

I

'[g Anomety Nuuber Description of Anomety Licensee's Response to Anomety Reneining Action 18f The Licensee categorized volves XVC-8481A, -84818, and The relief regmst has been no further action is 8481C se Category C in the ISI Velve Test List but corrected.

required.

Incorrectly categorized them as Category S in their metlef aeqJest S.2.

18g The licenses sateperized velves XVC. m a, 84808, and 8480C The cold shutdown justification has to further action is as Category C in the ISI Velve Test List tset incorrectly been corrected.

required.

categorized them as Category 8 in Cold Shutdo=n Justffication CS-CVC5-10.

18h The licensee incorrectly categorized vetve XVC-6799, GTP-302 has been corrected. The no fwther action is rsector building fire water s:4 ply check,- es Category A on MOV is mrustly open and is required.

p.12 of 33 in the Ist Velve Test List iAen it should be repaired to close in an accident categorized A/C. Additionetty, this check volve is white the check vetve is nacimetty identified as being a possive velve nelle the motor closed.

operated vetve spatream of it is identified as active. The licensee should acadress this inconsistency.

18i The Licensee did not assign a category designation to Per plant desiys, these velves are No further action is velves IFV-4T8, -488, and -496, mein feedsster contret not Code valves; however, the IST recpaired.

volves, ami to valves IFV-3321, -3331, and -3341, mein program cc siders them to fmction feceseter control vetve bypasses, in the IST program.

es Category B volves and tests them These globe valves should be Category 8 and tested in es such. A footnote has been ed$ed accordance uith the Section El regstrements for Category 3 to GTP-3GZ to clarify this.

po w operated velves.

15)

The licensee categorized volves IVC-1684A, -16848, and -

The cold shutdonc justification has no further action is 1684C es Category C in the 1st Valves Test List but been corrected.

required.

incorrectly categorized them as Category 5 in Cold shutdown Justification ts-FW-4 15k The licensee identified the system containing valve 6054 as GTP-302 has been corrected.

We f wther action is System JR instead of fat on p.14 of 33 of the 151 Valve required.

Test List. Additionetty, the CS cottee) indicates tel/A instead of M/A.

18t The licensee categorized valve KVC-2661 es Category A/C in The cold shutdown justification has No further action is the ISI Vetve Test List but incorrectly categorized it es been corrected.

required.

Category A in Cold shutdonsi Justification CS-IA-1.

filjj fI

. 9 s

s s

i i

i no n

n n

i o

o o

t i

i i

c t

t t

A c

c c

a a

a g

n r

r r

e.

e.

e.

i hd hd hd n

i t e t e t e a

rr rr rr m

ui ui ui e

f u f u f

R q

q w

oe oe oe nr nr sr sa y

h l

a no m

i o

t n

a A

o i

d d

c e

e f

t t

t i

c c

t e

e e

s r

r s

n u

r r

j o

o o

c c

p i

s r

n n

e a.

e e

R dd e

e t e b

b s

ut

'e hc s

s e

se a

a r

h h

s dr r

l o 2

2 e

oc 0

0 c

c 3

3 i

n L

ee P

P h e T

T Tb G

G ne e

iv 1

s f h l

1 e

eT

" a y

ePv i

v"I 8l l

6t e.

i 7 c rt.

scS 8e s4 sci 2r fi1 a

- rs oL -

P*

e a

om F

Ah dco st r*

t nnd nsd o

ait oen ff u

iT a eoo Ath t

v y

6us as4 id3 7b ce1 t a3 ts 8

d ov-ce m

2tl tl R Atf o

- so a

so en n

CiC eV A

VL h

d hi4 X

n tI r t

2 f

ti S o 1

o ss dI C d

eeB e

e sp n

vT t e,

t a o

l y

sh1 s

n i

aer i t4 iAo t

vvo l

6 l 6 p

l g n

7 n dae yi y9 i

a r

evt l

g l 8s s

c z

a.

t5 e t

l s

iI C2 c8D cCo-e rS e0 eVc D

oI sS r7 e rX g

aM r8b r

e ee o

oev t hmS cdd cvi at eC nnl nl s i au i as c

h ntn o

vo ei o

sAh e

P e

di eS s ef/

sCet sD soe.

n za n7 s n

vt e yi c e8n e ni s crri c

o coti ioof i si ii cL l ggi L et L tA eet va c

t et t s el c enes haau hao h uh e TCcJ T vt Tf tT y r l

s*

e m

n o

a B

5 o

t 1

1 nAm

!i

!l 111