ML20128B233

Requests Listed Addl Info Re Review of Plant Amend 14, Section 13 of FSAR

ML20128B233
Person / Time
Site:	Monticello
Issue date:	08/04/1969
From:	Brauner A US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:	Vassallo D US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 9212030601
Download: ML20128B233 (2)

Text

-..mmmmmmi-m ....ia F 1

AUG 4 1%9 B. Yassallo, Reacter ProJoets Breneh $ '

Division of Reactor Licensing '

Original Signed by TERUt Budley Thompson, thief oudley Thompson Operatiemal Safety 3rmaeb, M L ' '

PETI pactION2W G) W OFTIE43t5535 382 - 30ERRATES

30. D36) 70WR 03EPAR (MERICEMA)

>n AIEW Baf ww - cA. 3 ,"

a Namarmaham fna A. Breener to D. Vassalle dated 1/31/69 ^ ~\ =

} The information provided by the applienat in response to Waerequests m d s is thc mferenced memorandua is quite satisfactory.

few ar.eas where additional inforestion is requested. Mosever, there are a

1.

• direct line responsibilities between the President of NSP an Superintendent of monticello. ,

~

2. t

\

toes during the prosperation, l=Mme and startup phasestht i -

3 h t precautions are taken and what plans are there for detecting the presence of individuals in unauthorised areast 4.

than the staff) idtile present at the facility. Describe er the method 5

Describe the aspects of tuactional design and physteal m '

sabotage from having potentially significant consequenoest 6.

Describe the organisational stracture for m mantieelle prosperational tests, feel 3ma41ag amt startup testing progroun.

• and tion oftesth tests precedores, results. the esadmet'ef tests eeat ,a4 the seriev an Provias a Geneription of estias'and 'l' palificattama this et all armanimaties.

lateria aparating EW, S. E. amt Seektal peroommel assigmod 3 (.to possess ABC lineases. Wify 14tish indivitaals 1EL1 7 '

h t mechanism is proposed for the seatinulag review er presseures ,

to satisfy the need for preparing new preeseares er to fanke abanges to existing procedures to cope with presently unforeseen situationst 9212030601 690904 PDR ADOCK0500g3 A

~ _ - - - - - _. . .-_ .. . ~ . - - - . _ - . . _ .

i i

. - Il  !

i 1

D. Yassallo AUG4 1969

]

i I 8. After the opersting procedures have been written sat appewved, d et

provisions are there for assuring that the procesaros vill be distributed, read and understood by responsible personnalt l

~;~

j 9 What ecomminientions are available for insatiate notiftention a

! assistanee of both on-site and off-site pareannel saa asemetes dar -

l ing an energency, particularly enring a total less of poser ~',,

! situatient l 10. m o is responsi m and e at plans are there for matatoiming'(eale l

breting, repairing, ete.) emergency equipment and instrunsetationt i 11. Have procedures been written to facilitate recovery of the facility

after the emergency condition is terminatedt

12. What provisions are used for the dissemiastion of information to the l general public regarding an . emergency situatient 4

l 13 Describe the records management system in detail, specifying

a. esponsibility for record keeping, l b. retention period,

c. storage loestion, and l d. availability of records.

14. Provide more details on the protective action levels that will deter

• mine the initiation of the emergency plan and the immediate and long-term measures to be used for the protection of on-site and off-site personnel. Specify the bases for determining the action levels used.

There is some vagueness or inconsistencies concerning the emergency plan.

Rather than to attempt to eranserste all of these in this memorandum, it would be beneficial to discuss the plan with the sLpplicant at the next aseting to alarify these potats. r l

a

. 't ,.

l '

,QL l0A.R.arouner operatimaal safety aransk, anL'

4 cc: D. J m ovbolt, AD/Ro, M L D. R. Maller, t ief, RF % M L omcE nsa:ng.. ... ps3:nni/

su m n ,. ..ARBraunerijs ,, Mb n ,

wn 8M@.. .. . 8/MB . .. . . . . . . . . . . .

Form AEC-stb tRev.9 53J AECM 0240

• u. s. sovsawamt samvmo orrect: 1.s e o - 3 2 0..

__