ML20127M683

Requests Board Inform Parties Whether Board Wishes to Be Advised of Intervening Developments Re Const of Dry Cask Storage Facility.Licensee Will Continue to Provide Info Until Advised Otherwise.Related Correspondence

ML20127M683
Person / Time
Site:	North Anna
Issue date:	06/26/1985
From:	Maupin M HUNTON & WILLIAMS, VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:	Wolfe S Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#385-612 OLA-1, NUDOCS 8507010325
Download: ML20127M683 (2)

Text

T anAIs_"=" %

HuwroN Be WILLIAMS 707 E'As? MAIN sTMEET P.o. Box 1535 aooo etwmsvLVANaA AVENug. N.w. RIcawowD. V aoIwrA eoe1e ,e e ,A.. A,c,,uc p.o.oosseaso ~ta voa ~t- oaa wAswiwovow. o. c. aoose H,LeETE

• o

Tekspwows aoa.see asoo TELEPHONE SO4 758 820t'9'hRb vetax 7s47os rimeY vamonw'A eANM To cn TWX 710 - 95 6 0061 e o a v muitoemo e o. sox ice

p. o. som sees mAbteo . montw camouma areoa

,'t";* ". ."e"!0^.e'.'s's2. '85 JN 28 A10:39 " " ' " ~ * * " ' " ' ' '

estem7ssere r'ast TchMEssEE eANN outLosmo soit c=Asw sa'oor modo June 26, 1985 ,,,,,,,u ", y,,,"J n, ,,s o, raiarAm. vimoswsA amoso .a r 3 { {p . i,. -- Trusp=ows ois-e37 43 e veternons 7os-asa aaoo { { { g g gr oinact pial mo. so4 res. 8372 The Honorable Sheldon J. Wolfe Atomic-Safety and Licensing Board Panel U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 In the Matter of Virginia Electric and Power Company (North Anna Power Station, Units 1 and 2)

Docket Nos. 50-338/339 OLA-1

Dear Judge Wolfe:

The Licensee noted in a footnote on page 30 of its Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions'of Law that on June 10, 1985, NRC advised the Licensee that it would not object if the Licensee were to begin construction work on the dry cask facility planned for the Surry Power Station. There have been additional develop-ments in connection with matters that were the subject of testi-many at the hearing. For example, on the evening of June 20, the Board of Supervisors of Surry County authorized the issuance of a conditional use permit for the construction of the Li-censee's dry cask storage facility. I am advised by the Licensee that work will begin on the facility momentarily. In addition, i testimony at the hearing indicated that DOE plans to begin re-ceiving Surry spent fuel at its Idaho test facility in early July 1985, pursuant to the Cooperative Agreement. Thus, still more new developments can be expected to occur between now and issuance of the Board's Initial Decision.

Customarily,_the Licensee's practice would be to advise the Board of such developments as they occur. On the other hand, I am sensitive to the fact that the record is closed in this proceeding and that the Board might prefer to reach its decision without regard to intervening developments. I would therefore appreciate it if the Board would inform the parties as to whether it wishes to be advised of intervening developments that are relevant to the subject matter of the proceeding or 8507010325 850626

{DR ADOCK 05000338 PDR bb]

~

t HUNTON & WILLIAMS The Honorable Sheldon Wolfe Page 2 June 26, 1985 whether it would prefer not to receive such information. The Licensee shall continue to provide such information to the Board until you advise it that it should not.

Yours very truly, bd ,. L2 (U . M ,E -

Michael W. Maupin MWM/bjc cc: Secretary, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Honorable Jerry Kline Honorable George A. Ferguson Henry J. McGurren, Esq.

James B. Doughterty, Esq.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board I

i k_