ML20127L514
| ML20127L514 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 06/10/1985 |
| From: | Andrews R OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | Denise R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20127L459 | List: |
| References | |
| LIC-85-246, NUDOCS 8506280045 | |
| Download: ML20127L514 (2) | |
Text
.
r.
s I
I Omaha Public Power District 1623 Harney Omaha Nebraska 68102 402/536 4000 2
2 1)
JUN I 71985 i
Mr. Richard P. Denise, Director Division of Resident Reactor Project L
..S
& Engineering Programs U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regian IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, TX 76011
References:
(1)
Docket No. 50-285 (2)
Letter flRC (D. R. Hunter) to OPPD (R. L. Andrews) dated April 23,1985(Docket:
50-285/85-02)
(3)
Letter OPPD (R. L. Andrews) to NRC (R. P. Denise) dated May 23, 1985 (LIC-85-219)
Dear Mr. Denise:
Notice of Violation IE Inspection Report 85-02 The Omaha Public Power District received the subject inspection report, Reference (2).
Reference (3) provided the District's response to that report.
In a telephone conversation on Friday, May 31, 1985, with Mr. Blaine Murray of your office, it was noted that the District's response to Violation (285/8502-01) contained a typographical error.
In order to correct this error, please find at-tached a revised second page to Reference (3)'s attachment. This change should permit close-out of this item.
Sincerely, R. L. Andrews Division Manager Nuclear Production RLA/DJM/dao 8506280045 850624 PDR ADOCK 05000285 Attachment G
PDR cc:
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036 Mr. E. G. Tourigny, NRC Project Manager Mr. L. A. Yandell, NRC Senior Resident Inspector 455124 Employmen h qual opportunity
(3) The date when full compliance will be achieved.
The District is presently in full compliance.
2.
Instructions to Workers 10 CFR Part 19.12 states, that:
"All individuals working in or frequenting any portion of a restricted area shall be kept informed of... the health protection problems associated with exposure to such radioactive materials or radiation, in precautions or procedures to minimize exposure, and in the purposes and functions of protective devices employed; and shall be advised as to the radiation exposure reports which workers may request pursuant to 10 CFR Part 19.13. The extent of these instruction shall be commensurate with potential radiological health protection problems in the restricted area.
The FCS Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR) states in Section 1.2.1,
" Plant Site," that the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20 is that area bounded by the site protected area fence, as depicted in Figure 1.2-2 of the USAR.
Contrary to the above, an NRC inspector determined on Marcn 4, 1985, that the licensee had not provided appropriate radiation protection instructions to approximately 140 workers currently badged to enter the restricted area.
This is a Severity Level V Violation.
(SupplementIV)
(285/8502-01)
Response
(1) Corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved.
A memorandum of training (training " hotline") was sent to all individuals badged with green or yellow identification badges. Holders of green or yellow badges are not permitted unescorted status into the Radiation Controlled Area of Fort Calhoun Station, but are permitted entry into other parts of the restricted area. The " hotline" was distributed March 8, 1985 and provided green and yellow badged personnel with the additional infor-mation necessary for full compliance with 10 CFR Part 19.12. The infor-I mation provided was commensurate with the radiation hazards found infre-quently within the restricted area but outside the Radiation Controlled Area.
In addition, the information provided in the training " hotline" is being provided to green and yellow badge candidates during initial and requalification training along with the training previously provided in Station General Employee Training for yellow and green badge qualification.
(2) Corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations.
The actions described in (1) above resolved the issue. No other action is 1
considered necessary.
(3) The date when full compliance will be achieved.
The District is presently in full compliance.
i
-