ML20127K271
| ML20127K271 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/14/1985 |
| From: | Hubbard G, Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20127K262 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900914 NUDOCS 8505220084 | |
| Download: ML20127K271 (14) | |
Text
ORGANIZATION:
NATIONAL TECHNICAL SERVICES HARTWOOD, VIRGINIA REPORT INSPECTION INSPECTION NO.~ :
99900914/85-01 DATE(S):
3/4-8/85 ON-SITE HOURS:
72 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS: National Technical Services ATTN:
Mr. W. J. Ison Division Vice President State Route 748, Box 38 Hartwood, Virginia 22471 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTACT: Mr. W. C. Hartman, Quality Control Manager TELEPHONE NUMBER:
(703) 752-5300 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT: Testing Laboratory.
NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: Approximately 15 percent of the National Technical Systems (NTS) total business (dollar value) is a result of testing of equipment for the nuclear power industry.
.m ASSIGNED INSPECTOR:
bd \\N.hn T-14-FI G. T. Hubbard, Equip. (Val.' Inspec. Section (EQIS)
Date OTHER INSPECTOR (S):
R. N. Moist, EQIS
/
APPROVED BY:
M
[ed.o_ h fgf U. Potapovs, Chief, EQIf, Vendor Program Branch Date INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
A.
BASES: Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50.
B.
SCOPE: This inspection consisted of:
(1) a technical evaluation of equipment qualification (EQ) test activities for safety-related equip-ment; (2) verification of implementation of corrective action (CA) on the nonconformances identified in NRC Inspection Report N.s. 99900914/83-01 and 84-01; and (3) verification of implementation of the quality assurance (QA) program.
PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY:
Not identified.
$0$*hh 99900914
ORGANIZATION:
NATIONAL TECHNICAL SERVICES HARTWOOD,: VIRGINIA REPORT INSPECTION NO.:
99900914/85-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 2 of 6 S
A.
VIOLATIONS:
None.
8.
NONCONFORMANCES:
1.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix 8 to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraph 4.3.2.4 of the Quality Control Manual (QCM), the test technician had not initialed and dated corrections to recorded data on data sheets for Master Job Order (MJ0) 558-1572.
2.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraph 2.4.3.1 of the QCM, the test technician had not initialed the appropriate column of Job Traveler Fcrms (JTFs) for MJ0's 558-1720, 558-1686, and 557-1382 when it had been ascertained that a test had been conducted and completed in accordance with applicable specifi-cations.
3.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and para-graphs 12.2.8 and 12.3.1 of the QCM, the audit report for the May 1984 corporate quality internal audit was not issued within thirty days of the conclusion of the audit, did not request a response date for corrective action, and there was no documented evidence to indicate that the required follow up had been performed by the Lead Auditor.
4.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraph 6.3.1.1.(7) of IEEE-STD 323/1974, NTS test plans or test procedures did not list' test equipment requirements for MJO 558-1572 or list all test equipment accuracies for MJ0s 558-1572 and 557-1382.
C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS:
None.
D.
STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS:
1.
(Closed) Nonconformance (84-01):
The current annual review of the QCM had not been performed.
The NRC inspector verified that the annual review and revision of the NTS QCM was completed as committed in NTS's corrective action response.
2.
(Closed) Nonconformance (84-01):
The current yearly re evaluation of test personnel had not been performed for four test personnel.
The NRC inspector reviewed four supplements to personnel records and verified that the NTS re-evaluation of the four test personnel was i
.,w-.
ORGANIZATION:
NATIONAL TECHNICAL SERVICES HARTWOOD, VIRGINIA REPORT-INSPECTION NO.:
99900914/85-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 3 of 6 conducted and completed as committed in their response. Additionally, the NRC inspector verified adequate CA on this nonconformance by reviewing the internal scheduling system set up by the Quality Control Department.
3.
(Closed) Nonconformance (84-01):
General data log sheets were found for MJO 557-1434 which the test technician had not signed or dated.
The NRC inspector randomly selected general data log sheets from four MJO files.to verify that data sheets are now being signed and dated by the test technician. The NRC inspector also reviewed the quality control audit report and associated checklist which was for an internal audit conducted on December 17-18, 1984, by the NTS, Hartwood, QC Manager.
The checklist contained a characteristic relative to-signing and dating general data log sheets and no deficiencies were identified in this area during the December 1984 audits.
4.
(Closed) Nonconformance (84-01):
Original test data sheets for seismic tests conducted under MJO 557-1434 were not filed in the " Job Package" and were not available for inspection by the NRC inspector.
The NRC inspector verified that tne original data sheets for seismic tests were now in the job package.
The inspector also reviewed three additional job packages to verify that all test sheets are being kept in their associated MJO files.
5.
(Closed) Nonconformance (84-01):
NTS's test report reviews do not always assure that the results of test prcgrams are accurately reported.
The NRC inspector verified that the appropriate corrections were anotated in Revision 2 of Nuclear Qualification Report (NQR) 557-14778.
The inspector also reviewed four additional test reports and their associated MJO files and determined that the reports are accurately reflecting results of test programs.
6.
(Closed) Nonconformance (84-01):
No enveloping profile or synopsis of the acceleration of the total duration of the design basis event (DBE) and post-DBE from one year to approximately 30 days was provided in NQR 557-14778.
The NRC inspector verified that the correction was anotated in Revision 2 of NQR 557-14778.
The inspector's review or four additional MJ0s determined that test reports are adequately including all appropriate data and analysis necessary for complete understanding of conducted test programs.
i ORGANIZATION:
NATIONAL TECHNICAL SERVICES
[
HARTWOOD, VIRGINIA i
REPORT.-
INSPECTION NO.:
99900914/85-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 4 of 6 7.
(Closed) Nonconformance (83-01):
The audit report for the April 1982 corporate quality internal audit did not request a response date. for CA and there was no documented evidence to indicate that the required follow-up had been performed.
The NRC inspector verified that the CA forms which were generated by a previous Hartwood QC manager relative to the April 1982 corporate audit and which were not available for NRC review during the May 1984 NRC inspection, were permanently lost.
Based on discussions with the new QC manager and review of available documentation and actions taken by the new manager, the NRC inspector determined that adequate CA had been accomplished relative to the April 1982 corporate audit.
D.
OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS:
1.
QC Program Implementation Review - The NRC inspectors reviewed four MJO ffles containing documentation which supported testing efforts.
Documentation included purchase orders, receiving and shipping documents, test plans, test procedures, test reports, and test data.
The inspectors' review of the above documentation was to verify continued implementation of.the NTS QA program.
During the above review and evaluation, the NRC inspectors identified the nonconform-ances described in B.1, 8.2 and 8.3.
The NRC inspector also reviewed changes that were incorporated into Revision 3 of the QCM.
The inspector determined that the changes were minor and did not change the NTS's QA program with respect to the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50.
2.
Technical Evaluation - The NRC inspectors performed an in-depth technical evaluation and review of four MJO files for qualification testing of safety-related electrical equipment.
The following table summarizes the MJO file numbers examined including equipment type and types of documents examined.
MJO Equipment Type Documents Examined 557-1382 Solenoid Valves Test report, test plans, test procedures, test specification, purchase order.
558-1572 "MI" cable and Connector Test report, test plans, Assemblies test procedures, test specification, purchase order.
l
ORGANIZATION:
NATIONAL TECHNICAL SERVICES HARTWOOD, VIRGINIA REPORT INSPECTION NO.:
99900914/85-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 5 of 6 MJO Equipment Type Documents Examined 558-1686 Insulated Motor Stator Test report, test plans, test procedures, test specification, purchase order.
558-1720 Solenoid Valve Test report, test plans, test procedures, test specification, purchase order.
The NRC inspector reviewed the EQ process prescribed in each test' plan and reviewed test results, including the bases for accelerated thermal aging and' radiation and verified calculations.
Each of the four EQ test plans and related engineering documents were examined for the following:
a.
Adequate test instrumentation and their accuracies were described and used to meet the requirements of NUREG-0588/
IEEE-STD-323/1974.
b.
Equipment interfaces were addressed.
c.
Test acceptance criteria were established as described in the test specification or in the design engineering documents, such as calculations and engineering letters to meet the nuclear regulatory requirements of NUREG-0588/IEEE-STD-323/1974.
d.
Same equipment was used for all phases of testing and represented a standard production item.
e.
Environmental conditions were established and described (e.g., pressure and temperature profiles, and thermal aging factors were consistent with those outlined in the test specification or test plan).
f.
Test results were adequately reduced and evaluated against established acceptance criteria described in customer test specifications or purchase orders and that these requirements had been met.
ORGANIZATION:
NAT10NAL TECHNICAL SERVICES HARTWOOD, VIRGINIA REPORT INSPECTION N0.:
99900914/85-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 6 of 6 g.
All prerequisites for the given tests as outlined in the test specification had been met.
h.
Test equipment included a description of all materials,-parts, and subcomponents.
During the above evaluation and review, the NRC inspectors identified the nonconformance described in paragraph 8.4.
J e
f
-c y
i PERSONS CCNTAC-"iD Ccmpany W 5 Habos d oates h eck 4,jffs Occket/Redort No.797884/V f-8/
Inspector
~ of
/~
Page
/
V Pre-Inspection Conference Post-Inspection Conference NAME(Please Print)
TITLE (Please *rint)
ORGANIZATION (PTease Print)
G.T Ha b bo rd Ev:s. au,, I + ibr ten, <.
- v. s. MAc 4
/
/
f R W. H,,#
En, a:p. 4-al 4 7bs 1Enr,. u. 5. A Ac J
{d. t f hp f rif & n k Netno t er-Y h
M Cte r tv. c, Ha c%n il C n W 75 y e <-
ee aog e
w
,w r
i h
PERSCNS CCNTAC~iD Ccmpany N 5 N^YYGOE Dates o is 7. Mf5
\\
/
Docket / Report No.9 9 W O 9/4/ YS*-0)
' inspector Page T of l'
Pre-Inspection Conference
/ Post-Inspection Conference
'NAME(Please Print)
TITT.E(Please Print)
ORGANIZATION (PTease Print) 1 G.T H bbni
& :s en/457Euc.
IVM c_
/
t' RW.Mo,#
L% :/>d-H E Tshec IUx c-Ys 19^
oV!Ts' Ort V?te ft'PSrYVis ?
Y[$
v.c-Heh <n dA Ar
?r/T's CecI Garr: son W a cle ac E d &,e c uTS aso a
e 6
l n
I i
e
_ _ _. _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
PERSONS CONTACTED N TS Ha rtwo od oete, Hsccksr-g )995 Company Docket / Report No.9 998d7/Y/75-8/
Inspector 6. T /Yu hS n M Page l of
/
NAME(Please Print)
TITLE (Please Print)
ORGANIZATION (Please Print)
Bill Ha rtman
() A /%,.
A> Ts Fe b 6~le c
%. -,C Asf tt, c Nrs Co ci Ga rs.>on b u clea - S.
N TS P-l%y AJe. c A~lwf-a rs l
y i!
PERSONS CONTACTED
- 3. -
Company MT3 WAA7tdMD Dates 4-8 Mn/2cM /995 Docket /Re' ort No. 999009'Y SS'Of Inspector
/?:U. M0/5T N
p Page l of _(
NAME(Please Print)
TITLE (Please Print)
ORGANIZATION (Please Print)-
p 73 150B his 2.
Dynamics A19w%er r(y 5 CARL Greget S$4 N EG)
N Auw eR_
MTS F
6 NK c
9 N
N m
x
-i
.I li y,e, o c...:,. :a; + : imp.. >; e :....
- -..a;. > u a
..,. u.c., : n, +.;.
- .,,v.
. ~:. 3..
. s.._,. 8 -:.. + - a
G. 7~Ha bba nd o=ewar aa. 99 9so9/</
1HsPelcTOR scope _
DOCOMENTS F.X At44 N ED R Epo n T e46. I f
- Of past 1-os:
1 y
- A* m7' aav.
Days '
Ttvs.s/suguacy u
rt Te i
f'l e SST-J'720
% ctee Tob 49r cley-Fi /e. Sor Jo/e., o,] %, lae //ss em /> {y
/
3.
pro 5 -14s I e' alalt'l %!:f 'c.Jes, /%7f,-acoat-
% IE p cle. sac..'.e as v.197so '/'/
3 F,'le 551 -14rt R sTe,'Tc h 6 edec /~~~/e for-ClassN 2~ s 1Je~ct MA r eJo ce. Mea ct' r (o ta,% ~ e25 >, (~/e r mtr St to,.
o P-toI-7"f' LI.
fR D sq-t to/i/14 Te s t R-sto-e <.) b c H TO -ff f -//16 6
0An 3
f/i]94 0 sal. fy on%I H,. -.I m7o es 9 Ma s t~ r 'iM d cde n i= le fo ch te n,g i4 tv. s c.
f,'le-i 3r 2.
e
').
5PEC-L= Jfd 0 1
5/3f/SJ Sp er o'$,'ca.'ls'd>, '$er}'~lf lerlllr 9 e h.hl eor aro'/ //s /s.m S 8.
> 3 su
'1/'i/sel Dc f t nu I Acro rr 50 r pt. Tap ss 7 -is r,2$=
11'7-r 9.
R f T~
i31215 r/iai/s / $t~,< ff J, na ( )fe,ss, T hr F1.TO.rf '7-/Jf2L ff7-b/ /ty P<a ff'l'~%c.lles f~ h < /4.TD ff 7-/3fA iD-APT
?!82 c.
/7
//.
TYPE OFDOC:
ETT i Tp-pe,r8,Ep DWG-DRAdlus P
SPac-SPEctFICATtod Pac-ProcEcuRE m q$nawont o.-koncu_conawrass, e, nose o-e po I
INSPECTOR k O. Mol6
' DOCKET HD, 999009/7 scope TaspecTsou occonswis EXAMINED REPORT t46. Jff - O /
P A G E-
.1 O f:
- g ' 'MLy ***g 7 "
asv.
para Tivts /susaacT
/
4AM 3
iM W oud i% Gmrao L Mk.oudA Tort. rge uMsassacro,a et % sdu
( rot 5 2
T~2O Ude/ Eof SRSomif Trams'n suesenc6 eird 4onfsienrisas r-oa. Ll ?e 4
U 3
W dh3i/ -
Na-sreh nos oeosa. E Le.
.1_ 6t sr a..
Y CLS ss7-s us 4
+M-n CemenaD Acc-sussr3 tex se ismit hs$s.
l5 A)&R ss7-I'l27B 2 miwN h/uc)eniz Quafoficanois of IAxote 77Letxoccadh. 7Dcons Dernrohl a
g,
(*c7n11ec To1 - YSStM bbf5.
4 (o bar acciH Con, oud e,urer.ca goaA k c,oJ,4
~
V
)
hpoE.T NDEc hi[
e
- 1 70 j%$cN[
4 CAss SE (D oo_Qi g.,c, mad og e e r ( % ne c 4os.s
- 'l nw
%-a +
msm 1s m a. e ce w & a JJJ eA it 4,s
..isa lO
.592 C-i SMhl hudfDfC (Yc<5S.$E huYF/cpnc& ot= 62] AlIs 52Gf o
W DssAfe:/ da {rd i Omnec/rni $.sse Mier.
) \\. TP 59i'-ts12 A I tostVi W 5 7 $ & /i7R 6 0.
Mir>Ncc0j?rscha l0 5 Onwebit $&nb/n h
S3k'-lS*)2.
3/0Cf N NO M h Rcen0Y Te of Q r f &/?ff.$.8 SA.E //fu.)ns?dh / 3uha.h/
64/c and canneeds Sr.se,,,ns.
TYPE OF DOC; DWG-DRAW ING LT R. - 1. E T T E R.
SPEC-SPEct rtC ATio6J M ~ REPOf2_T PRO-PROCEDURL
- YRaw"'* Gapsareacc i Gua2 Focoria.s3 An*Qk Mh>JGh\\
L ~ _(Le w e d Let SI M g.r_*
D - Q L DocUHEMT g ~ A M rn L M U S 9 6 $.
.O. - PORCH ASE O RDER
.2P - NH- ##h
~J.H H - 163 T E R el A t. HKHO
I r
i i
'd I
]
l s
O 4
c-s g O l
~
8 2
+
i
%g d
E h C N
o d
.?
j Dw
' M
~
-o g o m
n'WG t
~\\
O Oc 4 4
f o
O g
. o.
O t;
a e
4
?
e
- S n
o 5
I w
N
~
g o
X d
0 b
k d
2 W
x 2
N 5
W 0
L T
l 0
olf-
- d W'
N Nk
! e@9 9
A s
8IIIIll Of
-b vi g
2 E
I i
EE k 7 1
m L
7
- 2 OW gd O
O 0
8%
~
lz a
2 h
~
edd o m
m j
4 4
Kut J
'S
,A
- $U33 ZWs g 2,t3,o2 ],
2 I
gh O k O
q Q
La O
g0 ed 4 d 2
F g
w g
4 i
o d o.roS H V
si, sis' g
h 1,g wv p.v aorme H d 1.
_