ML20127A797
| ML20127A797 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire, Mcguire  |
| Issue date: | 04/11/1985 |
| From: | Tucker H DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | Grace J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8506210263 | |
| Download: ML20127A797 (3) | |
Text
_ _.
e o
Dunn POWER GOMPMMY P.O. HOX 33180 CHAltLOTTE, N.O. 28242 HAL H. TUGKER TER.EPHONE y5 gpg ;9 g 9., 2 3
<rnna m mu April 11, 1985 Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30302
Subject:
McGuire Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370
Reference:
RII:NE NRC/01E Inspection Report 50-369/85-05 and 50-370/85-05
Dear Dr. Grace:
Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201, please find attached a response to violation 50-370/85-05-02 which was identified in the above referenced inspection report.
Very truly yours, kb.
////
H. B. Tucker PBN:smh Attachant cc:
Mr. W. T. Orders Senior Resident Inspector McGuire Nuclear Station O
^
506210263 850411 ADOCK 05000369 i
G PDR s}
JEO I
^
's1 DUKE POWER COMPANY McGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION RESPONSE TO NRC/01E INSPECTION REPORT 50-369/85-05 AND 50-370/85-05 Violation 50-370/85-05-02, Severity Level V (Supplement I):
10 CFR 50, Appandix B, Criterion V, as, implemented by Topical Report Duke-1-A, Section 17.2.5,'cequires in part that activities affecting quality shall be accomplished ~in accordance with requirements imposed by instructions, pro-cedures and drawings.
Station Directive 3.1L, requires that combustible agents and other unnecessary materials be removed f rom control access areas upon completion of the task being perforned.
s Contrary ~tc the above, on February 12, 1985, procedure requirements were 4
being violatedEin that two cans of liquid penetrant materials and a brush l
I applicator were found inside a control access area of the auxiliary building near the area where liquid penetrant examinations had been performed. Other materials usad for this type NDE examination had been removed.
Response
1.
1.
Admission or denial of the alleged violation:
I Duke Pawer Company denies this violation. The area of the Auxiliary Bui.lding where the two cans of liquid penetrant materials were observed
~
is 6esignated as Housekeeping Level IV under McGuire Station Directive i
3.=ll, Rev. 9.
This Directive in part states:
l I
l
." Level IV: Level IV cleanliness shall apply to areas in which it is desired to regulaps the use of tobacco and eating for material and equipment protect ion or for health and fire hazards and in which con-trol of personnel and materials is not required. All QA Conditions 1, 2, or 3 electrical work request activities are Level IV.
A.
Thdre will be no eating, drinking, or use of tobacco l
prcducts within the Level IV area.
1" B.
Level IV cleanliness shall be obtained by removal of all df rt and debris from an area. Cleanliness shall be maintained by placing all waste material in con-veniently' loc'ted trash receptacles and by not allowing a
waste to accumulate in the area.
C.
Level IV areas shall be marked by prominently displayed signs as per Attachment 6.
QA Conditions 1, 2, or 3
<3 electrical work request activities are exempted from these posting requirements.
Inspection of Level IV cleanliness shall be performed on a scheduled basis by a Quality Control Inspector. The QC Inspector normally veri-
'fies compliance with cle~anliness requirements by signing the applicable i
s '
l-i
e
. Maintenance procedure at various checkpoints. Discrepancies shall be recorded and reported to the Station Senior Quality Assurance Engineer or his designee. Appropriate corrective action shall be taken on any discrepancy previously reported."
The presence of two cans of penetrant materials in a Level IV Housekeep-l ing area in which work was being performed does not violate these require-ments in that they did not constitute an accumulation of waste material, but rather were supplies used to do work in the area.
Even though the persons performing the work may have not been in the area at the time, the total scope of the work was not completed and the clean up of the area and the Housekeeping Inspection had not yet been performed.
2.
Reasons for this violation if admitted:
Not applicable.
3.
Corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved:
Not applicable.
4.
Corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations:
Not applicable.
5.
Date when full compliance will be achieved:
The station has been in full compliance with all applicable requirements in this area.
l
.