ML20127A670
| ML20127A670 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1992 |
| From: | Greenman E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20127A665 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-483-92-15, NUDOCS 9301120036 | |
| Download: ML20127A670 (1) | |
Text
..
~.
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Union Electric Company
' Docket No. 50-483 Callaway Plant License No. NPf-30 During an NRC inspection conducted on October 1 through November 30, 1992, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcemr..t Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violation is listed below:
Callaway Station Technical Specification 6.8.1 states, in part, that written procedures shall be established, implemented, -and maintained covering the applicable procedures recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1,33, Revision 2, February 1978.
Regulatory Guide 1.33, Appendix A,1.c., recommends administrative procedures be established for equipment control (e.g., lockiiig and tagging).
Callaway Operations Department Procedure ODP-ZZ-0004, " Locked Component Control," Revision 13, dated March 24, 1992, Attachment 1, " Locked Component List (Q)," specifies that valve BG V-0027 be locked closed with a seal type locking device.
Contrary-to the above, on November 15, 1992, valve BG V-0027 was found closed, but was not locked with a seal type locking device.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Union Electric Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the U.S. Nuclear _ Regulatory Commission, Region III, 799 Roosevelt Road, Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137, and a copy to'the NRC Resident Inspector at the Callaway Nuclear Power Station within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).
This reply.should be clearly marked as a " Reply to-the Notice of Violation" and should include for each' violation:
(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that-.have been taken and results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violttions, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply _is not received within the time specified in this Notice, a demand for information may be issued to show cause why the license should not be' modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as.may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will.be given to extending the response time.
Dated at Glen Ellyn, Illinois w
this3/ day of December 1992 E 6ar ~ll.'Greenman, Director Division of Reactor Projects koh$483 PDR