ML20127A662

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-483/92-15 on Stated Dates & Notice of Violation
ML20127A662
Person / Time
Site: Callaway Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 12/31/1992
From: Greenman E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Schnell D
UNION ELECTRIC CO.
Shared Package
ML20127A665 List:
References
EA-92-249, NUDOCS 9301120034
Download: ML20127A662 (3)


See also: IR 05000483/1992015

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:. . - _.

                                                                                                             -
              j*%g
               p                                         UNiitO STATES
                                             NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMisslON
  '
                      , . ...
        [[ } Y- (
        ; . .
                         :
                           $
                            j
                                                            REGION III
                                                      79,noostvcLTnomo
    *
         %                 e                      cten ettyn scusois so 2r
          %, ...../
                                                       DEC 311992
               Docket No. 50-483
               Licerse No. NPF-30
               EA 92-249
               Union Electric Company
               ATTN: Mr. Donald F. Schnell
                           Senior Vice President - Nuclear
               Post Office Box 149 - Mail Code 400
               St. Louis, MO 63166
               Dear Mr. Schnell:
               This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. B. L. Bartlett, and
              -Ms. D. R. Calhoun, of this office on October 1, through December 18, 1992.
               The inspection included a review of activities authorized for your Callaway
               facility, Unit 1. At the conclusion of the inspection, the-findings were
               discussed with those members of your staff identified in the enclosed report.
               Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within
               these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective examination of procedures
               and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of
               activities in progress.
j
               Based on the results of this inspection, certain of your activities appeared
               to be in violation of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice of
               Violation (Notice). The violation involved the discovery by the resident
               inspector that a valve in the chemical and volume control system was not
               locked as required. We understand that your recent audit of your locked valve-
               program also uncovered similar discrepancies.
               You are required to respond.to this letter and should follow the' instructions
               specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response.      In your
               response, you- should document- the- specific actions taken- and any ' additional-
               actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your response to this
               Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future

. inspections, the NRC will determine _whether further NRC enforcement action is

               necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
                In addition, one apparent violation was identified, and is being considered
                for escalated enforcement action in accordance with the " General Statement of.
                Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions" (Enforcement Policy), 10 CFR
                Part 2, Appendix C. The apparent violation _ for which escalated enforcement-is
                being considered involves _the failure to properly- set the close limit switch
                for. a safety-related valve. Accordingly, ~no Notice of Violation is-presently
                being issued for; this inspection finding. Please be advised that the number

i and characterization of apparent violations described in the enclosed

                 inspection report may change as:a result of further NRC review.
           9301120034-921231'
                                        '
                                              YD
           PDR' ADOCK 050004B3
                                    PDR
                                                                                              ~/ l/ (>-[] k-
           G.
      s
                                                                                                   -ik-
                     . -                . -   .
                                                  .           -     -
                                                                           -
                       -.                                                               ..
 -
                                                                             DEC 311992
 .    Union Electric Company                   2
                                                                                           l
      An enforcement conference to discuss this apparent violation has been                i
      scheduled for January 12, 1993, at 1:00 p.m., in the NRC Region III office.          i
      This enforcement conference will be open to public observation in accordance
      with the Commission's trial program. The purposes of this conference are to          l
      discuss the apparent violation, its causes and safety significance; to provide-      i
      you the opportunity to point out any-errors in our inspection report; to             l
      provide an opportunity for you to present your proposed corrective actions;          !
      and to discuss any other.information that will help us determine the
      appropriate enforcement action in accordance with the Enforcement Policy. You
      will be advised by separate correspondence of the results of.our deliberations
      on this matter. No response regarding the apparent violation is required at
     - this time.
      During the enforcement conference, you should be prepared to discuss: 1) the
      apparent miscommunication between the two crews of electricians as to the
      interim and final setting of the butterfly valve's limit switch; 2) the
      apparent misunderstanding of the electricians as to the capability of fiOVATS
      testing; 3) the reasons why the close limit switch setting error was.n6t
      identified during post-maintenance testing; and 4) the inability of equipment
      operators to identify incomplete stroking of the valve.
      In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
      this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed
      in the NRC Public Document Room.

'

      The responses directed by this letter and the enclosed Notice are not subject
      to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required
      by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-511.
      We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
                                                        Sincerely,
                                                            cdf            .<nwN
                                                        Edward G. Greenman, Director
                                                        Division of Reactor Projects

i Enclosures:

      1.   Notice of Violation
      2.   Inspection Report
              No. 50-483/92015(DRP)
      See Attached Distribution

I

   t
                                                                  _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _
     -
                                                                                      DEC 3 i -Ac'
      .     Union Electric Company-                  3
            Distribution _
             cc w/ enclosure:
             G. L. Randolph, Vice President,_
                Nuclear Operations
           -J. V. Laux, Manager,-
                Quality Assurance
             Tom P. Sharkey, Supervising Engineer,
                Site Licensing
             DCD/DCB-(RIDS)
            -Licensing-Fee Management Branch
             Resident Inspector, RIII                                                                -
             Region IV
              Resident Inspector, Wolf Creek
              K. Drey
              Chris R Rogers, P. E.
                Utility Division, Missouri
                Public Service Commission
              CFA, Inc.
              Gerald Charnoff, Esq.
              Thomas Baxter, Esq.
            -R. A. Kucera, Deputy Director
                Department of Natural Resources
             -L. R. Wharton, Licensing Project Mgr., NRR
              A. T Gody, Chief, Inspection and Licensing Programs
                 Branch, NRR (0WFN 12-E-4)
              J. Lieberman, Director, OE
              J. G. Partlow, NRR
              J. R. Goldberg, 0GC
                                                                                                       -
                                                                                                   '

, . . . . . . . . }}