ML20127A662
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ML20127A662 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Callaway ![]() |
Issue date: | 12/31/1992 |
From: | Greenman E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
To: | Schnell D UNION ELECTRIC CO. |
Shared Package | |
ML20127A665 | List: |
References | |
EA-92-249, NUDOCS 9301120034 | |
Download: ML20127A662 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000483/1992015
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:. . - _.
- j*%g p UNiitO STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMisslON ' , . ... [[ } Y- ( ; . . : $ j REGION III 79,noostvcLTnomo * % e cten ettyn scusois so 2r %, ...../ DEC 311992 Docket No. 50-483 Licerse No. NPF-30 EA 92-249 Union Electric Company ATTN: Mr. Donald F. Schnell Senior Vice President - Nuclear Post Office Box 149 - Mail Code 400 St. Louis, MO 63166 Dear Mr. Schnell: This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. B. L. Bartlett, and -Ms. D. R. Calhoun, of this office on October 1, through December 18, 1992. The inspection included a review of activities authorized for your Callaway facility, Unit 1. At the conclusion of the inspection, the-findings were discussed with those members of your staff identified in the enclosed report. Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of activities in progress. j Based on the results of this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in violation of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice). The violation involved the discovery by the resident inspector that a valve in the chemical and volume control system was not locked as required. We understand that your recent audit of your locked valve- program also uncovered similar discrepancies. You are required to respond.to this letter and should follow the' instructions specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response. In your response, you- should document- the- specific actions taken- and any ' additional- actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your response to this Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future
. inspections, the NRC will determine _whether further NRC enforcement action is
necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements. In addition, one apparent violation was identified, and is being considered for escalated enforcement action in accordance with the " General Statement of. Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions" (Enforcement Policy), 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C. The apparent violation _ for which escalated enforcement-is being considered involves _the failure to properly- set the close limit switch for. a safety-related valve. Accordingly, ~no Notice of Violation is-presently being issued for; this inspection finding. Please be advised that the number
i and characterization of apparent violations described in the enclosed
inspection report may change as:a result of further NRC review. 9301120034-921231' ' YD PDR' ADOCK 050004B3 PDR ~/ l/ (>-[] k- G. s -ik- . - . - . . - - -
-. .. - DEC 311992 . Union Electric Company 2 l An enforcement conference to discuss this apparent violation has been i scheduled for January 12, 1993, at 1:00 p.m., in the NRC Region III office. i This enforcement conference will be open to public observation in accordance with the Commission's trial program. The purposes of this conference are to l discuss the apparent violation, its causes and safety significance; to provide- i you the opportunity to point out any-errors in our inspection report; to l provide an opportunity for you to present your proposed corrective actions; ! and to discuss any other.information that will help us determine the appropriate enforcement action in accordance with the Enforcement Policy. You will be advised by separate correspondence of the results of.our deliberations on this matter. No response regarding the apparent violation is required at - this time. During the enforcement conference, you should be prepared to discuss: 1) the apparent miscommunication between the two crews of electricians as to the interim and final setting of the butterfly valve's limit switch; 2) the apparent misunderstanding of the electricians as to the capability of fiOVATS testing; 3) the reasons why the close limit switch setting error was.n6t identified during post-maintenance testing; and 4) the inability of equipment operators to identify incomplete stroking of the valve. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
'
The responses directed by this letter and the enclosed Notice are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-511. We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection. Sincerely, cdf .<nwN Edward G. Greenman, Director Division of Reactor Projects
i Enclosures:
1. Notice of Violation 2. Inspection Report No. 50-483/92015(DRP) See Attached Distribution
I
t
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - DEC 3 i -Ac' . Union Electric Company- 3 Distribution _ cc w/ enclosure: G. L. Randolph, Vice President,_ Nuclear Operations -J. V. Laux, Manager,- Quality Assurance Tom P. Sharkey, Supervising Engineer, Site Licensing DCD/DCB-(RIDS) -Licensing-Fee Management Branch Resident Inspector, RIII - Region IV Resident Inspector, Wolf Creek K. Drey Chris R Rogers, P. E. Utility Division, Missouri Public Service Commission CFA, Inc. Gerald Charnoff, Esq. Thomas Baxter, Esq. -R. A. Kucera, Deputy Director Department of Natural Resources -L. R. Wharton, Licensing Project Mgr., NRR A. T Gody, Chief, Inspection and Licensing Programs Branch, NRR (0WFN 12-E-4) J. Lieberman, Director, OE J. G. Partlow, NRR J. R. Goldberg, 0GC - '
, . . . . . . . . }}