ML20127A623
| ML20127A623 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 01/05/1993 |
| From: | Clayton H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Delgeorge L COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20127A626 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9301120025 | |
| Download: ML20127A623 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000373/1992028
Text
.
.
.
-
.
-
.-
.1
t
-
JM
5 1993!
'd
Ch ^ (P
f/\\
,
Docket No. 50-373
Docket No. 50-374
Commonwealth Edison Company
ATTN: Mr. L. O. De1 George
Vice President, Nuclear Oversight
and Regulatory Services
Executive Towers West III
1400 Opus Place Suite 300
Downers Grove,
IL 60515
Dear Mr. DelCeorge:
This refers to the inspection conducted by D. Hills and C. Phillips of this-
office, and by J. Roman of the Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety, on
November 26 through December 28, 1992. The inspection included a review'of
authorized activities for your LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2,
facility. At the conclusion of the inspection, the-findings were discussed
with those members of your staff identified in the enclosed report.
Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within
these. areas, the inspection consisted of. selective examinations of procedures
and. representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of ~
activities in progress.
Based on the results of this inspection, certain of your activities appeared
to be in violation- of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice.
With respect to Item 1, the inspection showed that actions had been taken to
correct the identified violation and to prevent recurrence.
Although Section
2.201 requires you to submit to this office, within 20 days of your receipt of
this Notice, a written statement of explanation, we note that this violation
had been corrected and those actions were reviewed during this inspection.
Therefore, no-response with respect to Item I is' required.
The results of this inspection also showed that certain of your activities
-appeared to be in violation of NRC requirements, as specified in Item 2 of the
enclosed Notice of Violation. The violation-is of concern because of apparent-
inadequacies in work instructions for motor operated valves that resulted in
the failure of a primary containment isolation valve.
You are required to. respond to-this letter and should follow the instructions
specified in the: enclosed Notice when preparing ye
response.
In your
response, you should document the specific actior, taken and any additional
actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After re awing your response to this
Notice, including your proposed corrective actio,. and the results of future
inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is
necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
8
9301120025 930105
ADOCK 05000373.
'
'G^
h
.
.
.JAN
503
Commonwealth Edison Company-
2
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this-letter will; be placed;
in the NRC Public Document Room.
The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
=
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
'
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
verwm m.m y
4 cw,,;ca n
H.-Brent C1ayton, Chief
Reactor Projects Branch 1
.
Enclosures:
1.
,
2.
Inspection Reports
No.
50-373/92028(DRP);
No.
50-374/92028(DRP)
cc w/ enclosures:
G. Dieder.ich, Site Vice President-
,
J. Lockwood, Regulatory Assurance
-
Supervisor
'
1
D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory Services
Manager
DCD/DCB (RIDS)
OC/LFDCB
>
Resident Inspectors, LaSalle,
'
Clinton, Dresden, Quad Cities
,
R. Hubbard
'
J. W. McCaffrey, Chief, Public
~
Utilities Division
Licensing Project Manager,.NRR
R. Newmann, Office of Public
Counsel, State of Illinois Center
"
. State Liaison Officer
'
3.f,
'
L
.-
Miller
't
e
Clayton
l
Vi/2 }