ML20126H394

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That Author Received Info Call on 920220 Re Contaminated Landfill.Memo Undtd.Related Info Encl
ML20126H394
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/19/1992
From: Shear G
NRC
To: Funk D
NRC
Shared Package
ML20126H374 List:
References
FOIA-92-278 NUDOCS 9301050174
Download: ML20126H394 (5)
v • d • e


Text

V

,. ?.?OW.?$?I',Y"WW.??&.. MWW "'~~??"'~.

?

e.

~

E di E0' OSr OS '-

0 CfR.A0 liif 0rt < T10 MEMORAtlDUM FOR:

Donald G. Funk, Jr.,

Inspect, ion and Compliance Specialint FROM:

Gary L.

Shear, Chief, Nuclear Materials Safety Sectson :

SUDJECT:

ALLEGATION REGARDING CONTAMINATED LANDFILL On February 20,

1992, I

received an information call from an individual wantina to know what the natural radiation levels were in ground water in northwettern Miscouri.

I recommended that the individual cell tim State of Missoura Department of Radiological Health.

Tt+ caller then went on to t, a y that a local landfill in the arer had been accepting radioactive w a c-t e without proper licensure whi ch had con taminated t he groundwa tt r an the area.

The individual ntated that groundwater compling renults had showed elevated l in o l t.

01 radacactivity.

The landt311 is located 3.5 miles nor tti o1 f eram t City. t10 and 3 s owried t.

4le 'ilv110211 Metal

.t r. r p.. bo

'te U. i ot,

t.oa ioo.

LA.

l eic r/ilm

' n d 3 c a t red

  • hat j )si ' t he si..(!

nOt pr-e F Or s 13

  • W 1 1. f i O E r, ed tt# gpcp3pg of rad 3oaCt3VG i

ma t er t a l at the landt311 but inew o1 erworal 2 nota duals who had.

I andicut.it to

'hs calle.

that I would rel-

+ +u t i n i c.rma t. i on to o-4-

4.ei

.. c i rt

  • hen be made who' hoc
c. c nnt
  • tw fdRC w0uld vou /.nd

-t c. ) 1 owo r. ca.

'l.,

i I o r i
. a i c.r..

Tto ind i, : A.. e i. d c o mic.*-t a n)(

w) *h

  • t- ) <

,.-.',,c.

kA

  1. 44 __

u-i..

1'.

t l

9301050174 920619

'PDR FOIA

. _.n;) INf riMATl J HASSE92-278 PDR s /.< n

--_..--_m.

j--- -._ -

!>0ctfMENT SFRIAL LIST R111-<12 - A-On22 SEP1 AL taillBER DOCLIMENT I

ALLEGER 3DEf;TIFICATION S} LEET 2

ALLEGATION MANAGEJtEf T SYSTDI COMPLITER SilEET 3

EXFJtPT MATERIAL kollTING S} LEET 4

U! GATED G. S!! EAR MTJ10

.f J 6[fA.

,46,4 rW-=e A M b

spqn. xms ay s

s/vnt c. - u a s.A,'. n R. e.,J 7

AAP 8

sh/n tre.

To e eA 9

& ;6 cpm)

'o c m f,. s w u 4 (c t. s. d 2i Amr i

e e

e.

/2 //

. -. ~.. -

. -... _. -. -. -......, - -. ~.. ~. - - - - - -. -. _.

i i

.e..e*.e****.

.*.e.*..*..*****.e*.****************.

.*n te.

e

{

ff AT N (E XEh OM DI Gt l

ROUTING SHEET FOR EXEMPT MATERIAL UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION lli

  • .**....a..*.** ***..*..*..****************.

I WHEN SEPARATED FROM ENCLOSURES, HANDLE j THis DOCUMtNT As UNCLAS$1FIED.

Each person receiving the attached material is responsible for its safe handling and storage in accordance with existing procedures.

ROUTED TO SIGNATURE DATE DONALI) t. Fl!NY Jk.

~

FEBRt'ARY 25. 1002 DEE BRIDGES FEBRUARY 27, 1992

/

j C.

_ _0$01 l

?

f?

..n.

hladus Mf y y_g/9t 3

i 7

...t...

gCFR I.I IN OR. Tio PT FROMYi

~

- - - _ ~.

.. - -.. -. -... - - ~

l

[.EGATION/ PERIPHERAL ISSUE ACTit PLAN Concerns and any peripheral issues associated with a concern should be documented on l

a separate page. Each concern and peripheral issue, if any, should be-documented in the followup report as is stated in this plan, if there are several concerns in one area,

.one page can be used. Otherwise, a separate page should be used for each concern.

g1/_7 Concern No.

/

/ Peripheral Issues Associated with Concern No.

1.

Action Evaluation:

The following method of resolution is reconmended (circle):

.i A.

Send to Licensee Requesting Response in Days with R!li Followup

  • O.

Priority RIII Followup C.

Followup During Routine inspection Within 60 Days D.

Followup with Assistance from O!

E.

No Action - Outside NRC's Charter (describe basis below)

F.

No Action - Without Merit (describe basis below) 7G.

Refer to g, g

H.

Other (speci If the proposal is to send to the licensee, the Action Plan should describe the general areas we expect the licensee to address.

II.

Inspector's Actions:

The following areas at a minimum will be reviewed during the inspection into the above mentioned concern and/or peripheral issue.

A.

Objective B.

Methods 1.

Persons to be contacted:

(-

2.

Documents and/or activities to be reviewed:

l-3.

Tine period to be covered:

4 Locations / specific areas to visit:

5 Other areas (specify):

. g g p / //k/ 444 fAf.

f M M f * *)

g 6

,w,xys,4w M M mu, f *Jd w y

A egation f!e. Rill 9 E A d d 2.-

t

,.y, 7.,

,. z,,3,7.,,.

;. my.. y A-L L E G A ION M A-H A G E H E h S'YSTEM i

ALLEGATION NUMBER - RIII-92-A-0022 RUN DATE: 02/25/92

DOCKET / FACILITY / UNIT:

/-LANDFILL

/

DOCKET / FACILITY / UNIT:

/ SKUILKILL METAL CORPORATION

/

l DOCKET / FACILITY / UNIT:

/

/

DOCKET / FACILITY / UNIT:

/

/

i

-ACTIVITY TYPES - MATERIALS OTHER NMSS r

MATERIAL LICENSES -

FUNCTIONAL AREAS OFFSITE HEALTH AND SAFETY-i DESCRIPTION - CONTAMINATED LANDFILL

-f

-CONCERNS -

1-SOURCE - PRIVATE CITIZEN CONFIDENT - NO

. RECEIVED - 920220 BY - GL SHEAR

/ DHSS ACTION OFFICE CONTACT - RC CANIANO RESPONSIBLE PGM OFFICE - M VIOLATION SECTION 210 ALLEGED --'NO STATUS --OPEN SCHED COMPLETION - 920620 DATE CLOSED -

ALLEGATION SUBSTANTIATED -

ALLEGER NOTIFIED -

'01 ACTION - NO OI REPORT NUMBEh -

. REMARKS

-RECEIPT OF INFO DOC UNDATED G.

L. SHEAR MEMO, T

DIVISION ASSIGNED

DRSS RELATED ALLEGATION FILE ( S):

N

' ACTION PLAN SUBMITTED:

N ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD;

'N RECOORDINATE W/01:

N KEYWORD: hP ENTEhED SYGTEM - 920225 CLOSED SYSTEM -

hECOED CHANGED - 920225 e

,n,..-

,. _ ~....,

-,. ~, -

.,,-.n----..

,.c.,,.,-c,,n,.~,n

..n veJ

,e-,-

n

~ -,

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20126H394&oldid=4273865"