ML20126G578

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Appeals Denial of FOIA Request for Info Re Const of Facility & Brown & Root,Inc.Requests That NRC Review Withheld Documents,Release Segregable Portions Per Section 552 of FOIA Exemption 5 & Describe in Detail Those Withheld
ML20126G578
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 02/13/1985
From: Huge H
ROGOVIN, HUGE & LENZNER
To: Dircks W
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
References
FOIA-84-487, FOIA-85-A-4 NUDOCS 8506180108
Download: ML20126G578 (2)


Text

/dnv/W L AW OFFICES RoGOVIN, HUGE & LENZNER a enortsseo=AL coneonation 1CMttt GOVIN 1730 RHODE ISL AND AVENUE, N. W. JAMES F. NEAL

,py p TERRY F. L(N2NER WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036 GEORGE 7. FRAMPTON, JR. _

JONATHAN D. SCHILL(R TELEPHONE CAVID R. BOYD RONNA LEE BECR (202) 466-6464

~

LUGENE J. COMLY VICRI C. JACKSON TELECOPIER MARSHALL 5 WOLFF (202) 466-6420 ARi$TA M. FOGLEMAN

$U$AN L. CARNEY SAUL B GOODMAN RANDALL LEE $P[CR MICHAEL D. LOWE GARY R. HARRi$

'" February 13, 1985 JcrFRty H eLATINER JAMES [. PFANDER 1

CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED '

APPEAL OF INITIAL FOIA DECISION William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission /SA E(MWh J Washington, D.C. 20555 /g p, Re: Appeal from FOIA Request 84-487,

Dear Mr. Dircks:

Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 59.11, we hereby appeal that portion of the above-referenced Freedom of Information Act request which was denied. 6 In response to the initial FOIA request, certain mater-ials were made available for review. A portion of the re-quest, however, was denied on the basis of exemption 5 of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 5552(b). A copy of my original request, together with your Commission's denial are enclosed here-with.

The initial request sought information concerning l construction of the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant and, in particular, information concerning Brown & Root, a Texas i corporation involved in the construction of nuclear power plants, including the Comanche Peak installation.

In denying our access to the requested information, the l Commission relies on subsection (b) (5) of the Freedom of In-formation Act (FOIA). That subsection, referred to as Exemption 5, provides that the FOIA does not apply to mat-ters that are:

" inter-agency or intra-agency memorandum or letters which would not be available by law to a party other 8506180108 050213 PDR FOIA HUGE 85-A-4 PDR i

ROGOVIN, HUGE & LENZNER A PROFgsteONAL CompOmaTsON William J. Dircks February 12, 1985 Page Two than an agency' in litigation with the agency."

5 U.S.C. 5552 (b) (5) .

We believe that this exemption was incorrectly invoked as the basis for denying the release of the materials listed as Appendix B of the Commission's denial. Furthermore, use of the exemption was not explained or substantiated.

The Commission has not met its burden of specifying which material is exempt and which is not. Section 552 (b) of Title 5 requires the Commission to provide "any reason-ably segregate portion of a record ... after deletion of the portions which are exempt under this subsection." The segregability provision applies to documents that are with-held in reliance on Exemption 5. If any portions of the withheld documents contain non-exempt material, we are entitled to its release. We respectfully request that the withheld documents be reviewed and all segregable portions be promptly released. If your office decides to continue to withhold some or all of the material in the withheld docu-ments, we respectfully request that you provide us with the justification for the denial of each segregable portion of the items being withheld. We would also request that you provide us with a more detailed description of the documents being withheld.

! Alternatively, the Commission should exercise its discretion and release the materials listed as Appendix B to its notice of denial. Accordingly, we believe that even if the materials are exempt from disclosure by law, they should be released as a matter of agency discretion.

In consideration-of the foregoing, we respectfully request that you reconsider the initial decision to withhold the above-referenced materials; exercise the Commission's i

discretionary authority, and make the withheld information available to us.

Respectfully submitted, P

! I

'I N %

Harry Huge Enclosures i

ll 1

i

'?

,,.. ge-

=.

. 6 As c ricts ROGOVIN, HUGE & LENZNER

= e nos L :.. en .s. C te8. B'O a *T *C.h e . L;. t.CG *,,s st: l7.' C the o o C ls L n '. n Ml' f; .. C , N , .. Jost:.r,r;:n use47*.Gt WA *, *18 N G T C t.'. . . C . Z o o 3 G C to.a.m

?t

  • 4Y f. ;t a..**.t te
. .
  • s ;. 4 ?
  • t' *. .

JC '.1 * - ' *. * . ..!'

C'.; ** c l* .s. s. .. t.< < ,

t^ *. , . . . t . :

( . . P.: . . (:.

  • 4.*. C.4ACv: ? . .. C C D;E E P & .
  • t. p.100. w * *. (2C?, ,t ? 6 2:

5.c.N i.:t* **

SAnL 2.Lo e ws..

2. .* A.. Ltt 18t:7.
e. . .. e t t . st c. t GA. e . . A t r..t
s. ..n
s. .: . :- - :.

..vtt C.kis c&

cstSh tulton gaf-457 D'.recte Civision of Rules, and Records Office ;f Isd.inistration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: Freedom of Info x.ation Request

Dear Mr. Felton:

Pursuant to the Freedom of Information I,ct, 5 U.S.C.

S 552, and the regulations prcmulgated thereunder by the Nuclear Regulatory Com.ission ("NRC") at 10 C.F . R. Parts 2 and 9, we hereby recuest that you provide us with the fol-icwing focuments:

1. Copies of all records in NRC's files pertaining tc iny sttiies, investigations, incuiries (fcrmal er infcrmal) concern ng the Ocmanche Peak Nuclear Pcwer ?lant (" Comanche Plant") in Texas as well as any agency documents, internal mercranda, reports, complaints, citaticns and orders which pertain to the Comanche Plant.

L are pri:...irily :.nterested in any materials rel.- ted to or concerning_ccnstruction of tne Cemanche Plant, by Crown &

Rcat, Inc., including safety conditions, employee relctions, work standards, allegations of inferior work, faulty vorkmanshi., l dcficient work standards, and deficient perfcrmance.

! 2. Copies cf all recordt in NRC's files pertaining I tc any studies, investigations, inquiries (formal or inforn.;l) ,

agency' documents, internal memoranda, reports, ccmplaints, citations and orders which pertain to Brown & Root, Inc., a Texas corporation involved in the construction of nuclear Power plants.

i P

s 1

-esq+1 s f 73 ' ' 4P- .

~ '

. .- NOGOVIN, h!UGE 6 LENZNER

. . c . ~ .e . . e a. .e. . ..,..

Joseph Pelton Jeno 12, 1984 '

rige 2 Piecse ca'l the undersigned as soon as the documants are avi.ilable and plc.ase notify us if you Encicipate that the expense of complying with this request exceeds $200.00. '

Thank you for your cooptr:. tion. t.

Sincerely,

.CGOVIK, HUGE : LE::Z::E.;

Ey:

/h(6 liarry Huge \ {

\

, i I

I.

I i'

s , *

$ i o

1- .

I

,h e

t i

t

  • :1 4

I g_ i

  1. .c( Ufd!!Et, M ATES E. " *

. T. Iu

- . e -

. NUU. AR WiGUL A1 DRY COi.b*.lSSION

. r.'AtHmc10::. O c. 2cz:.

' a. ry Eure, f (D

D 0 i l($

oir e '

. ,e n. . . .

. ~ . n~., ; ..; . -

a V 9 , -;;. t..;,

.:c e. - rr. i'er t .

his :: ir fu.-ther respons '

~

'.o ycur letter C:ted i une 1h 198/:, in *:hich jou rec: vest ', purrutr.t r..rt rdina Ert.za & Rcet, Jr.r. to the Freedon of Inferr.r. tion Act (F0lt.), dccurents

.- c:,o .ns 'istec' c- de er.citscd App rr'iy A art sob lr:s to :.> cur recues .

.:, p c' :s .

-tecatd;;c:~.:ents am alter.dv Evaila:le it. tb.^ NRC Du' l'c Prcer:e " F e .

.:,u i t: e s, i r. , D. s h .i re W , c's.. c:n,.v rc:eca refer ire 't

~._ct.

r, ; Tf.r.  :*/ ' ! i,-the " to cce:s dccurr:- g i r. sic r u::t ert ici '.i' icd t t

. .r1* E'f s 1, [,, 7. ET d & } Will bE plEced it-t:.< .":u.rer.S Ct. ries

" be filet ir Ci,R fcid-r FOIA-54 It7 :. der ycur nate. :1:. IO al di

'9s docerents listed cr. enciesed Appendix ?, contain corr =ents, advice krinio; s tred rr. - .end ticcs of t % staff dering : Jeliberativr. precess and ar.:. ba'r e . .

+h_( . sic frei. . Alic discit.:,are p :rsutrt " Exeaticr. 5 cf the FOIT (E U.S.C.

e-'

': M

- forr ett.t10 icr.CFR wculc(:.5(E:(f) of t'ae Ce .issier's reteit. tic 7r.Pist'osure ir.%ibit car.c'ic -- f rr.n2 c..~unicItir.r.s in forare

' i . <_ r t ' c r.s cr'*.. cnid rt % in tl.e cutr intertst. Segry t!.'e fac w l it.f e r.r.r ' : n tr . :I ret dy :.-: e pitted in t?.c ptiic (cuir..

Pursuar.t tc 1:. C:c 9.c c:-: tht Cc.::c:issier.'s verelations, i: ha: teen drtc.r inc4 .

thtt the inforc=-icr uittheid is exe::pt frc prce.ucticr. cr tisclosere tr.c th t

'ts procectici cr disc 1cn.ce is cer.trary 1:. ti's put lic in c rest. The certo's Drest.cnsitie

S ctr.r, Of.fice 4r th'sofderni are tr.c ur.dersicaed anc V.r. RicN *d C.< Dev eurp,
  • Ir.spsetica cr.d Enforce:. Int. .

ih's lettedrritl r. r 5; t,e appealec: tc the !!RC ui .rin 30 days frc.5 the receipt of this t

As providec in 10 CFR 9.11, any such appeel must be in writiro,

Dr. .issi c. to addressed tie Executive hs!.ingt r., .'.C Pirector for Cpera
int.s. U.S. I.'eclcar Reguiatr.ry it 2035E ar.d sbuid citt.rly strc cf. ti e en e lcy .nd the letter CEt i. is Er. "A;' pea' free er Initit! F0IA Decirirr."

The i.RC l'as rc. ccepleted its review of the retaininq docunents subjet t to ycur requer.t. l# rill respcnd as soon as that review is completr.d. f l

i Sincerely, h

/ .s J  !

\

i/l/Afd 9 , , - - - ~ - ~ ~ ~

.r s / /

t,  ?.

. J . 7 .j ,j: @-m

} . .

/ e J. M. Fr'. ton, Director

y Divisier. cf Rules and Rect,rds i Offict of Ad r.'nistratio!.

o Erclos ure:.: ts stAtcc I

U

m. .. e .,

4

.s' ~'

~

AffENDIX A

1. 1/23/04 Licensee's Ansvier Protesting Civil Penalty. (12 pen.ts) -
2. E/IE! n er.: ..? t t al 1( t t t
  • frcn Pichen: L. Str.s vt. F.! V , i :-
n.
  • ril:t :c: E h ". '. c i .

~. .i . ( ? n.5 % ) G  : c4Ci2iJ'~.

l.iOC;' . .. :: i.:.) s./t v.u - ..i.nt:

Allegnions Concerning Ccmar.che Peit Protective Coi. tings (12pages)(PDR: 8405290176/ADDD'/50-445-A)

3. 5/23/84 Transmittal letter from Richard L. Bar,gart.to Texas Utilities Electric Co. (2 paces) (FDP.: 84005300331/

, I.DCCK/E',-445-Q'  ; (refers to next ite.T.)

4. 4/25/8? Letter from Jahr. Taylor, BNL, tc Eric Johnson, RIV, (1 ptsc) (PCR: 8t05300315/ADOCK/50-445-Q) 5..'att?c! . -t:

USNRC IE F.egion IV Interi.v. Report on Protective Cottir.gs, Prepared by Brookhaven f.'ational Laboratory (9 pages)

(PDR: 8405300337/ADOCK/5C-445-0)

5. 5/31/5?. Letter fro:- J. B. Gecrge, TUGCo, tc Richard L. Bangert (1 page)
6. 6/12/E4 Letter from J. B. Georgs to Richarc L. Bar.gart (1 page)

(PDP.: 0412110293/ADOCK/50-445-A)

7. 7/16/8 Letter frcm J. T. Merritt, TUGCo, to Richard L. Bangart w/ attached responses (18 pages)
6. 7/20/E?. Letter fro . L. F. Fikar, TUGCo, to Richard L. Eangart st/attachtent, responses to findings of BNL report (47 pages)
9. 8/7/E4 Memorandum from Darrell G. Eisenhut,f;RR, tc P. Bloct.,

L'. Jordan, and K. McCollom (2 pages) Ecard Notification -

Allegations Concerning The Protective Coatings at Conanche Peak (feard Notification Nc. E4-136) (PDR: 8'0160313/

. ADOCK/50-445-Q) 3 10. 6/22/S4 Letter fron L. F. Fikar to Richard L. Bangart, Comar.che

Peak Protective Coating Allegations (320 pages) (PDR

8408220412/AD0CK/50-445-Q) 11, 6/13/64 Letter fro:r John H. Taylor, BNL, to Richard L. Bangart, w/attachr.ent, Draft report, USNRC, IE Recion IV Status Report r.n Protective Coating Allegations Prepared by Brookhaven National Laboratory (61 pages) (PDR:

l 840S220415/ADOCK/50-445-0 l

a i

,f I

,- I' . Re: F01A-CR-4e? .

. o. o -

APPENDIX B r

. '. ic 15  : .'z : ( l- 7 . .;J tu.; t: F.: L' . :,

t'!iM tt.':. .;HL i'i Ar,. (2 p;cs)

2. 02/01/fA Draft I;cie froa R. Rosano to J. Axelrad

Subject:

ATCHISCN/COMAtCHE PEI.K CASE. (1page) h k

_ _