ML20126C811

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Meeting Summary & Viewgraphs from 850411 Meeting W/ NRC Re Status of Const Assessment Program.Const Assessment Program Director Monthly Progress Rept for Apr 1985 Also Encl
ML20126C811
Person / Time
Site: Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/13/1985
From: Miosi A
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML20126C536 List:
References
0121K, 121K, NUDOCS 8506140531
Download: ML20126C811 (44)


Text

.

/

/^N,b one C

Commonwe:lth Edison First National Plaza. Chcgo, llisnois

' ( T 'J Iddress Reply to. Post Office Box 767 (j Chicago. Ilknois 60690 May 13, 1985 Mr. James G. Keppler Regional Administrator - Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137

Subject:

Braidwood Station Units 1 & 2 Braidwood Construction Assessment Program Monthly Meeting Minutes / Monthly Report Docket No. 50-456 and 50-457

Dear Mr. Keppler:

The eighth open briefing on the status of the BCAP effort was provided to the NRC on April 11, 1985 at the Mazon EOF.

Forwarded herewith is a meeting summary including a copy of the visual-aid material used in the presentations.

Also forwarded herewith for your information is the BCAP Director's Progress Report for the month of April, 1985.

Please direct any questions relating to BCAP to Mike Wallace, Assistant Manager of Projects and the Braidwood Project Manager.

Very truly yours,

,h .-j tYVM Anthony-b.Miosi Nuclear Licensing Administrator Attachments cc: NRC Resident Inspector - Braidwood NRC BCAP Inspector - Braidwood

-John Hansel - ERC N. N. Kaushal - CECO 0121K 61g0 g 850 6 tcAy 2 21985 G

Meeting Summary BCAP NRC/ CECO /ERC Monthly Meeting April 11, 1985 9:00 A.M.

Mazon BOF The meeting was opened with a brief statement by R. F. Warnick of the NRC Region III giving the purpose for the meeting, that is, to discuss BCAP. it's progress, and the Independent Expert overview Group's (ISOG) review of the BCAP. Mr. Warnick also stated that upon completion of the presentation by Ceco and the 180G, the NRC would respond to questions from the public in attendance.

The following is the agenda utilized for the remainder of the meeting.

I. Introduction Presented by the Braidwood Project Manager to provide the major topics of the presentation (see Enclosure 1).

II. BCAP Task Force Presented by the BCAP Director to provide the BCAP achievements for the month'of March. (see Enclosure 2).

III. Discrepancy Evaluation Presented by the Sargent & Lundy Project Director to provide Sargent & Lundy's status of work (see Enclosure 3).

IV. Quality Assurance j Presented by the Generdi Supervisor of Quality Assurance to I describe the overview activities of the CBCo BCAP QA group. I (see Enclosure 4).

V. ISOG Progress Report Presented by the Project Manager of the ISOG to describe the overview activities of the IBOG (see Enclosure 5).

Additional items discussed during the meeting are included in Enclosure 6.

The attendance for the meeting is provided in Enclosure 7. The meeting adjourned at 10:30 a.m.

1343J

Enclosure 1 Page 1 of 1 BRAIDWOOD CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (BCAE)

MONTHLY NRC STAFF BRIEFING APRIL 11, 1985 I. INTRODUCTION MIKE WALLACE II. BCAP TASK FORCE NINU KAUSHAL III. DISCREPANCY EVALUATION KEN K0STAL IV. QUALITY ASSURANCE NEIL SMITH V. INDEPENDENT EXPERT OVERVIEW GROUP JOHN HANSEL s

. Enclosure 2 Page 1 of 7

.c .

l BRAIDWOOD CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (BCAP)

MONTHLY BRIEFING PRESENTED TO REGIONAL OFFICE -- REGION III U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION N. N. KAUSHAL BCAP DIRECTOR APRIL 11, 1985 (1029J)

. Enclosure 2 Page 2 of 7

.c CSR STATUS .

(AS OF 4/5/85)

COMPLETED TOTAL REINSPECTION CHECKLISTS 26 26" VERIFICATION PACKAGES 2336 2514**

REINSPECTIONS 1779 2514"'

DOCUMENTATION REVIEW CHECKLISTS 28 28 DOCUMENTATION REVIEW PACKAGES 2173 2568'"

DOCUMENTATION REVIEWS 1246 2568""

  • TWO CONSTRUCTION CATEGORIES REMOVED, TWO NEW ONE'S TO BE ADDED

"" APPROXIMATE, CURRENT ESTIMATE 1044J

i l . ' '

O -

ao][m

$h \ / 7

/

,A g n

h/ /

,Ai i i p

/ P ip t - m o

n m .

C e g,,

p4 3

,3 o T

l ES m

eu t t

s a

s\

w\

w\ \ A I C

A V

H

/

5V/

8 5

A e w\. 0

/4 Ra k g

w\\ - 0 Sc a h CP , ,

g us f

i g - '

on ri r

e

/ 1 heR d

V / -

t P y p.

s n

g, '

y WN \ c e t sg ut w

!%I aA l

p E e

ARi /

f,(\-

t S

7 y/ '

/ N.

C N I

0 91

.B '

lp a1 i i C

l v

C m

o 1

1 9

O 8

0 u

7 0

1-0 5

0 p~ 3 4

0 3

O 2

O fV l

/

F T ' '

n

')

0 Enclosure 2 Page 4 of 7

/ / "/ \ \  %. N f[ '

'\' h x

h I

_ i th $ I,[k/[$$$ N  % D

z

  • e M . v o

/

v' sai

$ o Q m '

Ei i,/ZN '#88'S:'

we =

US $?4 2 ru 5>

o N Y[ ///[/ [ Ys\, 'N \' N "

' r O

__~~ -

ca  ? ?-. 5 aj n

'x

S ' 'jfpf {'N ' '

v // x xxv _

xx 8 .; m-'/.-[ //g:x .

.Nr ....

s i i i i i i i i 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 2, e s e c , n c.2 -

S?6DMCCd JQ'ON

. - ) O

RPSR STATUS j,nelosurp2 g g (AS OF 4/5/85)

COMPARISON OF PROCEDURES AGAINST CHECKLISTS COMPLETED FOR -

MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL (C0ATINGS)

M & 0 INSTALLATION (NON-METALLIC INSULATION)

COMSTOCK (ELECTRICAL WORK)

PULLMAN (HVAC)

CB&I (CONTAINMENT LINER)

PTL (INSPECTION & TESTING SERVICES)

RESULTS OF PROCEDURES REVIEW HAVE BEEN DOCUMENTED ON OBSERVATION REPORTS FOR -

MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL (10)

M&O INSULATION (1)

COMPARISON OF PROCEDURES AGAINST CHECKLISTS IN PROGRESS FOR THE FOLLOWING:

PHILLIPS GETSCHOW (PIPING & MECHANICAL)

G.K. NEWBERG (CIVIL / STRUCTURAL)

NISCO (NSSS EQUIPMENT) )

OVERALL WORK COMPLETION EXPECTED BY END OF MAY, 1985 l

l 1193J l

  • Enclosure 2 Page 6 of 7 RSCAP STATUS (AS OF 4/5/85) e REPORTS IN PREPARATION FOR 6 0F 9 PROGRAMS o REVIEW TO BE COMPLETED FOR:

NSSS COMPONENT SUPPORTS HVAC (WELDING, CONFIGURATION, DUCT STIFFENERS)

OC INSPECTOR REINSPECTION PROGRAM o

ONE OBSERVATION IDENTIFIED DURING LAST MONTH (TOTAL TO DATE 20) l l

l l

I F

1193J

  • Enclosure 2 Page 7 of 7 e

' f- O

, t. ..- .. .-

t, m ,

i

, -.i i.- ..

.I p

. , i ,

g.

u , -. -

. < -> .1 l

l ,_ ...

. .. t 1 1-. .; - -

3. -

i -

s. - >

, ,. i i - +. 1

=== ,  ; ,. ,

~_- ,

c w .

  • .. )  ?, 3

- i g* -

. s t r- - ' --

s_.- *r, s. * .i. T. *. C

~

p, ,- -

=== s , 3 , , , 1 3 -

7 s , , , t  ;

- f3 g- I 1.
i. 5.

- - ,. 5 d  !

I i s. t.g- *

?, . .

r. T. . ,.-

V' o

l

. I, ' ,

9 ,

'h, 't, * . h. *

}.. f, h T

rs . i ' " -..

A .

.1 A- 5 6 7

-T- j. _t,... ' -

g ,!

s ,

  • j

's ,1._ ' ),. .,f.. .1- }- 1 b ..f.

/* f -

' r- +

sv s t t. v. + .

.e

.i. _,

m

. t -. i- .. .

O fN . i.

,h.. ,I. , . - , ,

.I - s .

t

  • T.
t. . .-

-m- .. .

; . . ' i. . ... 's. 1 , } .. .1 -.1. 7

- + i . ,

i

~,' j. .t 7.. .

. I' . .:

f

'  ; .i' .!- ,1 c.

.~~

j F. i. . '4- .

T. - 1

,.. -]l,.N . ; ,

~.

r i s . l i

I

! h.

t.

i ..

l.

. {. '.L I

+

l i

p.

1. F. . -

.[. .;

  • l t

w l .

r",

- r-- r-- -

r-

,==

_ :_- C C-P_ .' i. - O -.

(c 5 (,- t,- .- 3. r, -

e. $

e 8- e.T-

,., .*:_.a 4

..e-=,9

APRIL 11, 1985 Enclosure 3 Page 1 of 7 CSR REINSPECTION DISCREPANCIES BY CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR POPULATION RECEIVED COMPLETED COMSTOCK CONDUIT 171 164 CONDUIT HANGERS 103 97 CABLES 46 14 CABLE PANS 110 47 CABLE PAN HANGERS 1 0 EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION 1 0 PULLMAN DUCTS 136 119 HVAC EQUIP INSTALLATION

  • 49 49 DUCT HANGERS 99 89 HOUSING AND PLENUMS 10 0 TOUCH-UP GALVANIZING 15 7 PHILLIPS GETCH0W SB PIPING
  • 43 43 LB PIPING 67 66 LB RIGID SUPPORTS 110 98 LB NON RIGID SUPPORTS 138 125 SB SUPPORTS 86 75 PIPING BENDS
  • 5 5 SB PIPING WELDS 22 20 LB PIPING WELDS 22 18 NEWBERG CONCRETE PLACEMENT 82 76 STRUCTURAL STEEL 84 77 MASONRY WALLS 18 4 1418 1193
  • ALL EVALUATIONS COMPLETED

. APRIL 11, 1985 Enclosure 3 Page 2 of 7 CSR REINSPECTION DISCREPANCIES BY CLASSIFICATION CLASSIFICATION RECEIVED COMPLETED WELDING - UNDERCUT, UNDERSIZE, POROSITY 312 272 DIMENSIONAL - LOCATION, LENGTH 299 261 BOLTING - LOOSE, MISSING, PATTERN 105 89 CONCRETE SURFACE DEFECT 31 30 DAMAGE - DENTS, HOLES, ARC STRIKES, DIRT 122 92 WRONG MATERIAL - GAUGE, SIZE 50 37 INCOMPLETE - SEALANT, CONNECTION 46 27 EMBEDMENTS 15 10 FIT-UP - DUCT, HANGERS, INTERFERENCE 27 23 FABRICATION - CABLE PAN HANGERS FIELD FAB 1 0 INVALID - NOT DISCREPANT 126 126 VALVE STEM ORIENTATION 20 19 SEGREGATION CODE LABELS - MISSING, ETC. 36 25 ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL CONNECTIONS - LOOSE 54 48 ELECTRICAL SEPARATION 32 26 CONCRETE EXPANSION ANCHOR 31 30 SUPPORT SETTING - SPRING, SNUBBER 25 23

~

CONDUIT HANGER 14 10 GALVANIZING 11 5 PIPE BEND OVALITY 4 4 MISCELLANE0US - I.D., TAGS, ETC. 57 36 1418 1193

APRIL 11, 1985 Enclosure 3 Page 3 of 7 4

INSPECTION POINTS / DISCREPANCY TYPES PIPING SYSTEM BENDS (CSR-I-M-5)

INSPECTION DISCREPANCY POINTS TYPES

1. RADIUS 200 0
2. OVALITY 200 A. OVALITY > 8% 4
3. BUCKLING / FLATTENING 200 A. FLAT SPOT 1/2" x 5/8" 1 4.. CIRCUMFERENTIAL WELDS 100 0 TOTALS 700 5 0.7%

t 0

4

~ -s,-- - - , - , , , . , , , - . , , , - . . . - - . . . ---,--r- + - - - ---.m e ,7, ,- _ . . . , - ,--.---e ec .-- ---. ._,-

. _ . . _ _= . . - . _ . . _ __ ._ _ _ _ . _ . _ . .

Enclosure 3 Page 4 of 7 1

CSR-I-S-004-017-001 MORTAR JOINTS IN EXCESS OF DESIGN 2

THICKNESS REDUCE THE WALL'S SHIELDING ABILITY.

6 1

4 l

l

Enclosure 3 Page 5 of 7

.O R A 7 J 0' . N A A

i JESGN R QJ QEYE\TS CSR-I- S- 004 -017- 001

gN APRIL ll , 1985 2

@ .J b(fi  :< : g y , .; ; :. < . ~ :p .; .--; ., , .. .

tn tn 3 =4

)

&.. .. .:.;.. .-:- ' :.:.:r.

  • : .. .:.. :.. m:-;. .:....:.::M'..r:::

. . . ~ _~

% qey, 1

a k

4_

I

'{:)g;;; :.:.?.r:!::< : ?y 5:y,f.9yy * ' -;  :: . ..'..:,* ::..:,:.j.'

.
.c..: ,-

4 ::: :.  :*..':.94.,

... 1.:'.

E_EVA ,0 \

_ . -.. = . . _. .. . ..-.. . . - ......_ - - . _. . - . . - . - - - - - -- . . . .

Enclosure 3 Page 6 of 7 i

CSR-I-S-002-022-002 EXCESSIVE FLANGE AND WEB COPES REDUCE THE BEAMS'S CONNECTION CAPACITY.

3 f

i e

. ., ..-,._,c._ ,,%,wr. .,--.ym --,. - w-., , ,------- - y--wmy,, ,+, , -, 7 ---,ww v, w--- - - - . ---

Enclosure 3 Page 7 of 7

! CODD r A\GE AKJ XE3 Or ._

A S- RUC-" QA_ S ' ErL SEAV CSR-I-S- 002- O22-002 APRIL 11,1985 a:

b 8'/fs'TYP n

Fl FVATION : AS DESIGNFn. ,

=

G =

b CDPE E'/CEEDS $

DESIGN DEPTH COPE TAPERSO yu o i

%j A

s g

r . -

FLAME CUT - -

'a

-k  :

l

! E_EVATON  : AS BUI L1

Enclosure 4 Page 1 of 14 BCAP 0.A.

MONTHLY BRIEFING N. P. SMITH APRIL 11, 1985 (0297B)

' Enclosure 4 Page 2 of 14 8 DOCUMENT REVIEWS 9 AUDITS /SURVEILLANCES I,

0 0.A. OVERINSPECTION/0VERVIEW A

4 4

(

(0297B) i

^

b

- ,-,- - ,-,- ---w-,- w.,,_-

-r - , - - - - , - - --+--me,, - ----~, ,-n - , - - -

Enclosure 4 m7 U-) U-) to Page 3 of 14 7

- LL ! ._.. -

C L.D C C H

F--

c H ___l

, M:: l- CL O U L._) N

.D C O >-

cr Ct. or c) l- }--- H Cn . Ln -s 7

O

>-d CC H 1 N. L1J \

co U. LO GT l-- LL.I l ii::

CD CM Ctc A:E H O D

_J F-- rp LC U L1J Q LLJ L)

LtJ CL O T LO C1C C) .C CL

>---4

%(?j 59.:0 .n sfs .?l *Ms-T Y'%:g}  ;.,@ $.!${l[$$}$)

v-- u. , . tg, ,g$ !jf(0}!jky'h.g l s ,.;g ylt.'s;t

@$v. *w, v:. c st9:gfg ES 6 C

--*.-. .h... v.N.hi!.I[b)!'i Cd

.:.f,$.

s:$7;  :.:;Mif,OS$.

-g. 33g;g @S2tg+Etg

  • $U}:f$${If'5[

h:iXE$!$ S' ,C -

ik i .a3:onx^:g.: f!h! .!b b!b!

e1"-

y <

.3 ; go, . .o,qd.9.M.

.-r o 3- W.LW. Misf>6ths: 5%RWiMisi $ X W'M$.jnN

  • Wt v;+<N5.t.$:,?tiji:%jjp
d- WW?.
t:43.'4A4AMX %M:djjX2.9:  ? fX%;'K^$:v: Dh 'hVff

.c a.i.

m'

4. snv .

.MXE4DPN 9:.M: G 3.v.9 9 <'$w 9 0X0)$uEU^ v ' hX9 s'

TJ

'.,g.r.?.

n A+A.+t'Dt>hDP(fX6f<3dshl?SMd'M

><$v*4At:KM an 3,xmmn e .w.mau f Nia*+*"E.At?h @@ an oy e.: *lAsW. 9.

  • fey?@:

u Syd.$e?

.. e Mf&v tE u.jX?%r@e#iXXM.

g am: cp s Me AF- 1:y$

s ^ 0;l: w>$". W (g3 7 M.m

.: 3w +d*n *9xteop?h :p:l'3: utoy s 0>t. Nf' 9)Mx:.n?n::.n 0)$^? m vg.h .99h@/  : LL.!

.0EM.p"?dohv EtM :",,y$. Sq,v>$xM us3ltkXfM}I LL,) w ' s' ,\'./.E.27M 1 MA [g,

& .M- *.t*. 3-MEf*E05 3xu fat^ x$ esp $iHX)?:v te9:%:E M.9g160x v. M Un:gfgg43X d::.bh.egk$:%[pg? $ 0wuu n LLJ F--i '

0,ggg:iuow4u ye"w wNMMh4PJA4A$X?

yarvm:nvuOvt w:wx EfA h. wofyc YA.m 9wxuon(<a-O h-- [' 'i ;.;.1-J .i,.7 )@)$sj  : 8i m ' 6--4  :(:X '.${$3)[:nMs?R?j}((l:s'"jiyA jN, N '. W@r  ::#f@i vu 4n.:e#s,, d:f:.dR*

wu us*4:fXtE:::,q' 2 1,...,.. s ,s ,e v

' :x w m.2 a .aJLf r .t.:p?.:.afem w&W4M+v:M':kop. 2tt A* Pop.,'2. a u

e m --s.

C_g F--4 WE$D

-: :C.fTCi2.?.{N$!$!p$

h yg,g. 3;a
:., . $is$l
N5$%[)$j,.e&(S$y. 5 J

e c w-w r ', 40 2 :.B:10 M0W C

/'

.3MPE@:!jgif!!i*!!fy9%!ji$iji$!$,g48,8!?)vik ut S:0l-) CD Y

s G

%@ h$hS!!lIh!hNY $$:lf!D8!$s:!.$id._E

.,,,-_s b e.: issN.:M>en

,- y -v . .x/,0v 03 u, m

-7 p LQ  ::: .i e' , :

  1. 9) "@upy, 'R3;g: ., ' ;6 -

~ u, ;y,  ; ,w l t- i

.::'l. s, ' . , . . .v.$fu e,e gp,?

C_) Lt.J H .%* ** ,- .

  • s.u LLJ

._ J LLJ  ::' !:::.?. :. ' .:#4

'l:<$l$ g gp Z

c:M *:#? N@:pJ${w$,u;e#2W l'";-. j$

q Of ts 1: l', i42 8[m: 342i 8;  :

7- ':- e ' ,, . !c. . s . .>E g5. p.y :@ 9P9:0h.onuGus $" pee:ns,

~

ad---

O [- .

-:: .:or:+ n

$.jp Ph?M:M.:M

F,: u :3,, ,. g: ^y;,gl$x3?h

.g 4::g O ---

.ny,t. .u..

w.. -

.s.<-. :+r. . mt wy8

.yym. vur gy *". v 3:  %.

O" -

/ gs CL.

  • LLJ l&:2t .. E cU+* f

.J. __r- :23:: : ~.g:s. , '4::-  :$g4; hs::k: $ 02 9 w.M =. @ . f. u<>t.;n.:M.y. "* ..-.

L_) --- J 2 > .w<0 v

c m m.w.xX no<

<uuc  :-

':: < ,s

,, . .,s g:p L )  :::

,,s

, v. ':@Lg.,ddh(,eap iF-f Qtjg tR4F#<.L $ jjaam$:f' 20 . M$

' m'

+

O '

-- . , s 4s Elh,. WEED-M}hhdi-EUMFrM?i$2,j!ii.f:8 i$5yN$5 ra $' @':

-tr.: rrent:rstst:rsttrmiremrem.02 s4 gj f f!: '"si at n h;x ::

'.,f u ds s ,.

ur:::13Ms&T?tt:t.T?MtWr5rtst?&As1 :!))p;g  : f{f hfp .

.8$.

-' ,'[$2] d,;c.fNkE

.s lM?l.D@ls?UT????$MTi$13?D$. $ (fXp% f fh E $$v:

3.;c+

'g

. 4 2:+- :Trrrrrt.A t2trg;trisustercit$2rt14: W f^ v,,,.!, yI fg;^jgRMM; C) l:$5h. '^

.~.s, /i'IO."((IU??Ir?i. b"$$22C[$Cdl?I?I?l?W.k#{ bh  : $: N f.:h$' Q J.QS: '<~;+ .:O ,

,,.,s MX g e.:v j:(fad,

@lftd

,-y g .y.'l.TT?$1f4t;Mt?;tR.$7.&M p ; M 9yyy g g yyy y -$yy 42;g p.: ,, ylQ;j:0[23

<J:f};f q,yg(p, 4Ye: 4 ,,,w. _.3:-;p.lg:p

~

$ 3k
s
M:yy.j:p
# ses f w: . ? wMg
g... jsfc #:%"'s~<' .'i;8i:? .

h${$l

63-::#:53:. v ' ' ' -

l

' N.Ue.te.' #:t Ro y.,

$gjMp3R C

'1..,.sQ ^y.:.:4j#8 .,, .,N206,-

.f:tas? LL!

0;;  : ~ "" 53X:: 4

);"X04:; (f')

::s}&%y$:g..

M}:t :  ? s s-

' -  ;:.Wik j u u s i s i s j u u n s i sl u s ii n i e g a i n u i s e l: u 'sii s p n s fu}3:$ip u ulib: ungo esa esa c:a esa esa esa em e em CO IN- 4 LI"? v f*'"> CN w-t 03M3I H1 SIN 3WR300 50 839WnN

BCAP DUALITY ASSURANCE.

AUDITS-16-14- I Actual AUDITS Scheduled AUDITS ,7 S l E12- 1

! +

2 w ~/ /

,7 E10- p.

u) . / ./

D 8-A .

/

O b-

, . . ,f ,f N 4- I 5

Z //

j/

2- </

l g .. /

I I I I i 1 1 I I I I I I I I Sg 7 14 21 28 05 12 19 26 82 09 16 23 30 07 14 21 28 Of 11 18 25 01 0815 22 01 08 15 22 29 SEPT "E

OCT NOV DEC Jf44 FEB t%R Sm

. . m

, BCAP OUALITY' ASSURANCE SURVEILLfNCES 200 -

CO j

3

$ 150- /

Z

! 957,

^ '

100 L

sw

+*essee em insisflie?

ave w4p?22 3 eife S

'm -

.~ 'r 1'

6Mi WWH3 :9 . . . 43E '9: ,

95: ! @# N

  1. g;jyi
    1. ##U M ## 0% l l--  :

E 90 :5 to LU  :

e  : q tD  :

85-i RE!

OBJECTIVE AGREEMENT F.- _

z  :

Lu  ;

o e 80::

to  :

o-  :

75 =

7g i N/A N. S.

I I I I l l l l l 001 002 003 004 005 006- 009 012 015 a'If 8 tri PIPING DISCIPLINE "i ON Pb m Hb b

BCAP QA 0/0 GROUP AND BCAP TASK FORCE INSPECTION ACCEPTANCE LEVEL AGREEMENT ACCEPTABLE > 90%

100 - - - - ---

-SE:: -

a,w mme E sems man am Efin n!Bs2 ggaa 95=:: =w!:P

  • e*

z e e*m era e' 5 aus*

s  : SM;iss M!! $ NedME..

z E.rfirse $1002 ten!En!!

ait 2+$$siss:!

mes-,i 1:52,,: anst -l g g g :-

m yg  :

yyy ,

tu LiJ  :

z  :

e 854 ERE SUBJECTIVE AGRELMENT z  :

LLJ  :

o m

gg_::

to  :

z  :

75,=

7g i N/A N/A N/A N. S.

I I I l l 1 1 I I yn 001 002 003 004 005 006 009 012 015 H O PIPING DISCIPLINE ON M

Hb b

BCAP QA 0/0 GROUP AND BCAP. TASK FORCE .

INSPECTION ACCEPTANCE LEVEL gg AGREEMEHT ACCEPTABLE ) 95X i

a5

"~ *M '

- j COMPLETE Z -

E m 90 5 :

& i E 85-! Ei! OBJECTIVE AGREEMENT t-  :

cli

=

m 803:

E i 75 1 UNDER i EVALUATION -NOT STARTED- NEW POPULATION 7g i \

i

/ - -

N /

i i i i i i i i gg 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 2 B-HVAC/ MECHANICAL DISCIPLINE

[i

BCAP QA 0/0 GROUP AND BCAP TASK FORCE INSPECTION ACCEPTANCE LEVEL AGREEMENT ACCEPTABLE ) 90%

Oh

, eee
(f -;i! $$$i$2fh 954 tings by $$%$

,-. i Weseilid sh 99F 5 E,, E Ws!# 4W z

m gg:E _ .. .

LLJ  :

m  :

o c

854 W

_E. SUBJECTIVE AGREEMENT z  :

LLJ  :

r' 80 2:

m LU  :

a.  :

75 4 NEW j -NOT STARTED- POPULATION 79 :

v v N/A N /

I I I I I I I I I mm 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 H O HVAC/ MECHANICAL DISCIPLINE  ::

ON

BCAP 04 0/0 GROUP AND BCAP TASK FORCE INSPECTION ACCEPTANCE. LEVEL gg_ AGREEMENT ACCEPTABLE ) 95%

i weme

.==

i;Easass

"' p"da* **

nam 95=: dm - immel

t.  ?

.c.- -

m r 90=:

w  :

W w

l <

c 854 Ea! OBJECTIVE AGREEMENT 2  :

LLI  :

o  :

=

og -

w  :

1  :

75,= NOT i - STARTED-7g : v v ClhD CbH CbL CbP CPH EIN $$0 ELECTRICAL DISCIPLINE Ci a.~

~

b

. 1  ;

BCAP QA 0/0 GROUPL::ANDBCAPfTASKFORCE INSPECTION ACCEPTANCE LEVEL AGREEMENT ACCEPTABLE ) 90/,

gg _

h sMissfgf:'

2

?:444dNMENi ememm gyE L - dBnik' isi-' -f:1.1.JP_i 3:- :::

gg .. .

E-F + ~ ~ 'N:'1 We.

E 85-i

F

- SUBJECTIVE AGREEMENT z  :

LLJ  :

m 802:

tu  :

5 754 NOT i - STARTED -

! N/A N/A v r 70 I I I I I I y,

CND C0H CBL CBP .

CPH EIN j!.

ELECTRICAL DISCIPLINE ti O

Enclosurc 4 i.- '

d. Paga 13 of 14 LO I-*

cn 2" Lt.J LU Lu LU J M CA CD G C t-Q._ Lu L u, H

  • ),

.c U Ld LO l--- - M  % - cm v CQ en UT1 O

L.L.! C R U Ud oc _i at 6.!

O U] t.O -

LL > C LU

.,c _1 A UJ-cn LU .<__

C LU H H F-- U Of -J

r C -c- LL a_ q F- - ew ~

q p--. Lo cw O O o_. 'D GA LLJ H H c_) O A G t C._, Z

.Z C T I

C, a--K DH H O }-- '2 QO to u.)

I:l Q--

1 CN 1--

o tg * - e CO

~N -

7 czy g

m a H U

CL

.G O

GA t;&:: a:;s:(

diiij!!!

di,9)i.y.:<..

I'-

. f.,

'g'f H

[::.::-*:y:

. i{!{!

hj: :I: ~

int {.;..,

nx e- cm r,t:

p o

ih:;g{V:.tp;;w:

... ..  : 1. .,

,?.::?f:$::ft:!:!.

i:iiEi:.!!$iiE; iiiiii n ii iii n iiiig ii n ii n i g n ii n lii n ii n g ii n ii n .

l CD LO CD LO CD LO CD CD CD CD CO CO N N H

R G 33800 REJ 33d

BCAP QA 0/0 GROUP AND BCAP TASK FORCE INSPECTION ACCEPTANCE LEVEL AGREEMENT. ACCEPTABLE ) 907, i

954 b  :

$ 90!

lii  ;

ls "I

E 854

m

- SUBJECTIVE AGREEMENT z  :

idi E y 80 i

& i 154 i NOT STARTED i N/A v "

70 ~ i i i i em 001 002 004 005 O CIVIL STRUCTURAL DISCIPLINE  !

s,*

^

~

b

d 4

4 4

BCAP STATUS i MEETING j for March, 1985 1 I INDEPENDENT EXPERT OVERVIEW GROUP 4 -

l i

mm an

! *X wm April 11,1985 d am

}

Enclosure 5 Page 2 of 7 6

v .. v3 I

m -

p ' = = ,. - ,

y .

m m O -- 6vw l

l .. m w

u' ,

-i i i

IE NN %E 4S NN $@ M 0 , =

m dh

=

he.S .

db .e db '

.mes p p - , .. r -

O u-G

- J l

.m w p ~\ . . \ -

O 1 V

I d

,1 ,

. . w M

i l'

J'

, , . . . - - - - - - _ . - -m, . , - ,-,.-,..,,,o r.--- --,-,,w ---,-----s..r-, 2m , , ,.,-.,,,m.-,-v.e-.---..-..-.---- . , , - - - _ . ---,-m

Enclosure 5 Page 3 of 7 l

. l EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

o BCAP OVERVIEW Functioning as designed with checks and balances in place.

o CSR ELEMENT Inspections still proceeding with minor -

probl ems. Have seen improvement in S&L review-responses.

o RPSR ELEMENT Providing a thorough review of construction procedures.

o RSCAP ELEMENT 1

Concern is that delay in the initiation of

a few elements will not provide BCAP with adequate time to assess implementation.

o BCAP QA Continuing to demonstrate good performance.

i

~ ' ~

n ' ""H i

~

~

OVERVIEW ACTIVITIES  !

REINSPECTIONS o Issued one IE0G observation, five Notice of Concerns (NOC).

~

AUDITS o Audited BCAP QA in three areas; one Audit Action Request, three concerns.

DOCUMENTATION REVIEW o Maintained reviews of BCAP observa-tions, S&L design significant reviews and PCD NCR's.

o Maintained reviews of checklists, procedures and plans.

I i

- _ - - . = _

1 ggasug 3 l

l CLOSED ISSUES

1) Resolution of IE0G observations and NOCs:

o NOC 85-001 -

AWS welds on a HVAC duc t .

o BCAP-0BS-008 -

El ectrical inspect-ors signing for welding and con-crete expansion anchor attributes.

- ._. . _- . _ . - _ . . . _ = . .

. -- >' Enclosure 5 Page 6 of 7 OPEN ISSUES 1

1) Resolution of Inspector Reinspection 4

element of RSCAP.

2) Verification of the incorporation of activities to resolve IEOG observa-I tions:

4 o BCAP-OBS-006: Inconsistencies in '

lists identifying CSR samples.

o BCAP-OBS-007: Problem with CSR Small Bore Piping Package review for " red line" drawings.

1 o BCAP-OBS-012: Construction joint not listed in reinspection pack- l age.

! o BCAP-OBS-013: Cable splices in 1 I

pan not identified in reinspection j package. l I

l \

gciosugs OPEN ISSUES (continued)

3) Responses to:

o BCAP-OBS-015: Beam flange inter-

ference on column blocks.

o NOC 85-002: Undersized fillet weld.

o NOC 85-003: Unwelded tip of unistrut.

o NOC 85-004: Undercut on AWS weld.

o NOC 85-005: Lack of fusion on AWS weld.

o NOC 85-006: Undersized weld.

9

-, -, - -------,-.ae-- - - , - . -.,--,-n.~n , ,--,.--.-----,.,-,-,,--,.-_.,..r----,,.,--,,-~,------,,,.w.- -

,g---,- .,w,,,,-,,-

Enclosure 6 Items Discussed at the NRC/ CECO /ERC Meeting April 11, 1985 Mazon EOF At the opening of the meeting the NRC requested that they be updated on the status of various Braidwood corrective action programs that are not a part of BCAP. Mr. Maiman stated that CECO would work with Region III on this subject.

Mr. Kaushal presented the status of the three BCAP elements. This included the status of the CSR element, RPSR element and the RSCAP element. Mr. Kaushal also presented the anticipated manpower requirements to complete the BCAP effort.

Mr. Kostal presented the status of processing BCAP discrepancies within Sargent & Lundy. Mr. Kostal presented data on the number and type of discrepancies as a percentage of the inspection points to provide an overall perspective of the results. Mr. Gardner of the NRC asked if results would be trended as well as dispositioned one-by-one. Mr. Kostal stated that trending would be a part of the normal NCR process. Mr. Kostal then provided an update of the HVAC duct test being preformed.

Mr. Smith presented the BCAP QA activities for the month of March.

During his presentation he explained the BCAP QA hold point placed on the processing of invalid observations which now requires BCAP QA review and concurrence.

Mr. Hansel presented the IEOG activities. He stated that BCAP has done what it was required to do and that there is good agreement within the program. Mr. Hansel stated that they have reviewed some recent Sargent & Lundy responses and felt the responses were much improved. Mr. Gardner asked Mr. Hansel for an opinion on IEOG observation number 16. Mr. Hansel stated that it was of no great alarm to the IEOG, that it represents a normal reporting of overview activities. Mr. Keppler asked what statement the IE0G would be in position to make at the conclusion of BCAP. Mr. Hansel felt they would be in a position to state that the BCAP was properly implemented and completed and that the objectives of the BCAP were met.

This concluded the presentation from CECO and the IEOG to the NRC.

At this time Mr. Warnick opened the meeting for questions to the NRC from the public in attendance. There were no questions.

It was agreed that the next meeting would be held in the Region III office of the NRC with the date and time to be established. The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 A.M.

Enclosure 'l Ligt Cf Att(ndees NAME POSITION ORGANIZATION J. G. Keppler Regional Administrator Region III, NRC R. A. Gardner Reactor Inspector Region III, NRC R. F. Warnick Chief, Branch 1 Region III, NRC 9 D. Schulz Sr. Resident - Braidwood Region III. NRC L. McGregor Sr. Resident - Braidwood Region III. NRC E. Char Regional Counsel Region III, NRC W. Muffett DRS Region III, NRC W. J. Kropp Resident Inspector Region III, NRC R. J. Lauer Attorney Isham, Lincoln & Beal F. A. Palmer Mgr. Nuclear Safety . CECO L. O. DelGeorge Asst. Vice-President CECO W. Willoughby Tech. Asst. SWBC F. B. Baldwin QA Manager SWEC V. A. Hoffman Site Manager of SWEC SWBC M. I. Miller Attorney Isham, Lincoln & Beal D. L. Leone Projects Eng. Mgr. - BY & BR S&L G. M. Orlov Asst. Director BCAP Ceco R. L. Byers Asst. Director BCAP CECO K. T. Kostal Project Director Braidwood S&L W. Chase ISOG, ERC J. L. Hansel ICOG, Project Manager ERC N. P. Smith General Supervisor - QA CBCo W. J. Shewski Manager QA CECO E. E. Fitzpatrick Asst. Manager QA CBCo T. J. Malman Manager of Projects CBCo N. N. Kaushal BCAP Director CECO L. S. Weiss BCAP - SWEC Deputy Mg. SWEC M. Franco Consultant MRF&A M. J. Wallace Project Mgr. CBCo 1343J

_ , _ - ~ . _ . . _ _ - . _ _ - . _ _ . - ~ _ _ . _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . _ . . ___ _

P ge 2 Enclosure 7 List of Attendees MME POSITION CIIGANIZATION R. C. Cannon BCAP-QA CBCo P. R. Pelke Project Inspector NRC P. Dunlop Engineering Mgr. SWEC I. M. Johnson Nuclear Comununications CBCo R. R. Minue Nuclear Engineer State Of Ill.

Dept. of Nuc. Safety.

M. R. Dougherty BCAP Supervisor Ceco J. D. Deress Project Engr. Mgr. BY/BR Ceco B. R. Pardunn BCAP Eval. Coordinator S&L D. M. Fischer Proj. Manager BCAP S&L D. A. Haley Sr. Proj. Engr. SEL D. H. Smith Nuclear Licensing Administrator CBCO W. M. Sides BCAP QA G/C R. F. Williams BCAP QA G/C 1343J

O i e PROGRESS REPORT BRAIDWOOD CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM j REPORT PERIOD MARCH I - MARCH 31, 1985 1

I. SUpWIARY/ STATUS This is the ninth monthly progress report for the Braidwood Construction j

Assessment Program (BCAP), covering the period from March 1, 1985 through

. March 31, 1985.

l' In the CSR area, all but five of the original projected 69 checklists and instructions have been issued, and work was initiated on two additional populations for NSSS equipment installations identified during this period. Reinspection and documentation reviews have been completed for four populations and are in progress for 24. Progress was made during i this period on development of all checklists for the remaining eight RPSR packages. In the RSCAP effort, field reviews continued and preparation of reports for several programs is in progress.

As of March 31, the number of personnel assigned to BCAP is 119.

t Adequate office and clerical staff supports the BCAP technical effort.

II. SCHEDULE ANALYSIS Based on progress to date on the CSR element, the preparation of packages for reinspections and documentation reviews is expected to be completed

in early May. The reinspections and documentation reviews are expected to be mostly complete by the end of May. Processing of the observations and analysis of the discrepancies are expected to continue through June into early July. Work on the RPSR element and eight of the nine RSCAP reviews is expected to be completed by the end of May or early June with documentation of the results completed during June. The RSCAP review of i Quality Control Inspector Reinspection Program is scheduled to be started in May and completed mid-July.

i III. PERSONNEL AND BOUIPMENT STATUS l

BCAP manpower totaled 119 as of March 31. Three additional inspectors were certified during March. Inspection personnel activities included training, accessibility walkdowns, reinspections, document reviews, supplemental observation detailing (e.g. weld mapping and configuration) and other supportive detailing.

e Implementation of the Data Base Management System (DBMS) continued.

i i

! (1183J)

-. _. - _ . - -- . - - - - _ _ = -

, Page 2 of 3 IV. BCAP ELEMENT STATUS A. CSR Status I l

Work this month concentrated on issuing reinspection and documentation review packages, completing technical reviews of checklists and instructions, resolving 94 and Sargent and Lundy checklist and instruction comments, completing the packages for more-highly-stressed items / connections and releasing for inspection the remainder of the visual reinspection packages.

Presently 64 out of the originally planned 69 checklists and instructions have been completed, the five remaining are in the final )

i sign-off cycle. Additional populations were identified for NSSS '

Equipment Installation and Supports. Population descriptions, checklists and instructions are being prepared for these populations on an expedited basis. I Reinspection and documentation reviews have been completed for four populations; conduit, Piping System Bends, Small Bore Pipe Configuration and Post-Tensioning. In addition, all visual inspections have been completed for five additional populations:

Cable Pans, HVAC Ducts. HVAC Equipment, Touch-up Galvanizing and Large Bore Pipe Supports-Won-Rigid. The documentation review has been completed for the Large Bore Pipe Configuration population.

i At this time the following populations are undergoing reinspections and/or documentation reviews: Structural Steel, Masonry Walls,

cadwelds, Post Tensioning, Conduit, conduit Hangers, Cables, Cable i

Pans, Cable Pan Hangers, HVAC Ducts. HVAC Equipment Installation.

Duct Hangers, Housing and Plenums Fabrications, Mechanical Bquipment Field Fabricated, Touch-up Galvanizing, Small and Large Bore l Configuration, Large Bore Pipe Supports (Rigid and Non-Rigid), Small l

Bore Pipe Supports, Piping System Bends, Small and Large Bore Pipe Welds and Materials and Instrument Pipe / Tube Supports.

l B. RPSR Status During March 1985, the RPSR efforts were primarily focussed on reviewing and finalizing checklists in the remaining eight packages applicable to the RPSR scope of work. The number of checklists in

, all packages was reduced from 29 to 27 during the month. Information in the two checklists that were eliminated had already been included in the proper packages for the contractors determined to be l responsible for the work.

(ll83J)

Page 3 of 3 Procedural reviews for the Electrical Installation and Thermal Insulation packages were completed during the month. These reviews check the coverage in contractor procedures of construction requirements from the PSAR and applicable specifications. Procedural ,

review for the Field coating package was completed in February. l Reviews for the remaining six packages are scheduled to be completed in April.

C. RSCAP Status )

l Field review of Contractor Implementation and Documentation Reviews was conducted for HVAC and NSSS Equipment this month. Preparation of the reports is in progress for the following programs: QCSSR, Safety Related Pipe Supports, Piping Heat Number Traceability, and Electrical Installation Documentation Review and Mechanical Equipment Installation.

V. PROBLEMS / DISCREPANCY FINDINGS A. Implementation Problems No significant implementation problems were experienced during this period.

a. piscrepancy rindinas A total of 3465 observation reports have been written as of March 31, 1985. Of these, the review for validity has been completed for 2302. Of these 1832 have been determined to be valid discrepancies.

Those forwarded to S&L for design significance determination number

, 1767.

As of the end of this report period S&L has not identified any discrepancy as design significant.

VI. R800pWENDATIONS No specific recommendations are offered at this time.

N .N. Kcuudgj N. N. Kaushal BCAP Director i

l.

(ll83J)

=*'W+w-i ---ee. ,y=w -----wwwa _ - . -e, w,._.__, , -.,.,,,, ._% ,., ,, . , __ _ _ , _ _ ,_, .. _ _ , _ , ._ , . ,p__, , , _ - _ _ _ , ,_ _.,,,,,. ., _ _ _ , , . , , , , , _ _ , _ . , _ , .