ML20125D864

Forwards Insp Rept 50-483/92-25 on 921102-06 & Notice of Violations

ML20125D864
Person / Time
Site:	Callaway
Issue date:	12/03/1992
From:	Pederson C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	Schnell D UNION ELECTRIC CO.
Shared Package
ML20125D866	List: ML20125D864 ML20125D878 ML20125D895
References
NUDOCS 9212160074
Download: ML20125D864 (2)

See also: IR 05000483/1992025

Text

.

DEC 3 1993

Docket No. 50-483

Union Electric Company

ATTN: Mr. Donald F. Schnell

Senior Vice President - Nuclear

Post Office Box 149 - Mail Code 400

St. Louis, M0 63166

Dear Mr. Schnell:

SUBJECT: ROUTINE RADIATION PROTECTION INSPECTION AT CALLAWAV POWER PLANT

This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. D. W. Nelson of

this office on November 2-6, 1992, of activities at the Callaway Nuclear

Plant, authorized by NRC Operating License No. NPF-30 and to the discussion of

our findings with members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

Areas examined during this inspection are identified in the report. These

areas included the radiation protection, radioactive waste and transportation

programs. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective

examinations of procedures and representative recards, interviews with

personnel, and observations of activities in progress.

Based on the results of this inspection, certain of your activities appeared

to be in violation of NRC requirements. However, as described in the enclosed

inspection report, you identified this violation. Therefore, the violation

will not be subject to enforcement action because your efforts in identifying

and correcting the violation meet the criteria specified in Section VII.B of

-

the ' General Statement of Policy and Procedurec for NRC Enforcement Actions,"

(Enforcement Policy, 10 CFR 2, Appendix C).

The results of this inspection also showed that certain of your activities

appeared to be in violation of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed

Notice of Violation (Notice). The violation is of concern because it is the

result of inadequate corrective actions from a previous violation. Because

this represented a violation that was repetitive in nature, the absence of

lasting corrective act hn may result in more significant enforcement action.

You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions

specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response. In your

response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional

actions you plan to prevent recurrence. You should also discuss these actions

in regard to the previous actions taken and why these actions are expected to

be adequate to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your response to this

, 6 Do

9212160074 921203

PDR ADOCK 05000483

G PDR

(

!

l

'

,

-

l

.

Union Electric Company 2 DEC 31993  !

l

Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future j

inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is

necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC

Public Document Room.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

"0&inat u. nd ' nthia D. Pdnen"

Cynthia D. Pederson, Chief

Reactor Support Programs Branch

Enclosures:

1. Notice of Violation

2. Inspection Report

No. 50-483/92025(DRSS)

cc w/ enclosures:

G. L. Randolph, Vice President,

Nuclear Operations

J. V, taux, Manager, Quality

Assurance

Tom P. Sharkey, Supervising

Engineer , Site Licensing

DCD/DCB (RIDS)

OC/LFDCB

Resident Inspector, Rlli

Region IV

Resident Inspector, Wolf Creek

K. Drey

Chris R. Rogers, P.E.

Utility Division, Missouri

Public Service f.ommission

Gerald Charnoff Esq.

R. A. Kucera, Deputy Dirnctor,

Department of Natural Resources

i ,o

%

Rlll Rill' Rlll RII )

n/sd 'Jbi

'

Nell P b son

LNe * # e

l