ML20125C163

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 840403 Memo Requesting Rationale for Proposed Ceiling in SECY-83-495 for Routine Safety & Safeguards Insps of Power Reactors.Ceiling Based on Data Provided for 1981 Insp Activities
ML20125C163
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/17/1984
From: Dircks W
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To: Asselstine
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20125C017 List:
References
FOIA-84-564 NUDOCS 8506110675
Download: ML20125C163 (1)
v • d • e


Text

-

' p so

.,e .

  • uq'o, UNITED STATES P" g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

{ t WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555

..... APR 171984 MEMORANDUM FOR: Comispioner s sselstine FROM: William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations

SUBJECT:

SECY-83-495 - CEILING FOR ROUTINE INSPECTION OF POWER REACTORS In your April 3, 1984 memorandum, you requested the rationale for the proposed

$166.100 ceiling for routine safety and safeguards inspections of power reactors. The ceiling is based on data which were provided for 1981 inspection activities. The data showed an estimated range of 1,300 to 3,135 hours0.00156 days <br />0.0375 hours <br />2.232143e-4 weeks <br />5.13675e-5 months <br /> for a typical plant for routine inspections during FY 1981. In computing the ceiling shown in SECY-83-495, the staff used the top of the range for safety and safeguards inspection effort (3,135 hours0.00156 days <br />0.0375 hours <br />2.232143e-4 weeks <br />5.13675e-5 months <br />) and multiplied the number of hours by the hourly rate established for IE ($53) to arrive at the ceiling of $166,000.

The data provided by IE were based on approximately six months of FY 1981 data. Enclosed is a list of actual routine health and safety and safe inspection hours (preparation time, site time and documentation time) forguardsall plants that were in operation in FY 1981. Analysis of data covering the full year (FY 1981) for plants in operation shows that the range is approximately 900 to 5,900 hours0.0104 days <br />0.25 hours <br />0.00149 weeks <br />3.4245e-4 months <br />. Of the 75 plants listed, 57 (76%) fall below the proposed ceiling of $166,000. As indicated in SECY-83-495, we intend to update fees annually to take into account any changes in cost. At such time all ceilings would be reevaluated.

William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations

Enclosures:

1. IE 7/27/81 memo
2. Computer Printout 4/9/84 cc: Chairman Palladino Commissioner Gilinsky Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Bernthal OGC OPE SECY 8506110675 841231 PDR FOIA REYNOLD64-564 PDR AIC

5 -

c ASWNCTON,0.C.39555 c

J Jul n g

%'.* s.- . . .. . . .

(,

MEMORANDUM FOR: Daniel J. Donoghue; Director Office of Administration FROM: Victor Stello, Jr.', Director -

' ~. Office of Inspection and Enforcement -

~

~%. -

T

SUBJECT:

PROPOSED LICENSE FEE SCHEDULE REVISION -

I have reviewed your proposal to use actual inspection manhours for license fee purposes, rather than a flat rate, as a way to recover more of the costs of performing inspections. More specifically, you propose to use manpower expended for all routine and reactive work plus all associated preparation and documentation effort, but not direct travel time. There are certain aspects of this proposal that I would like to have changed. First, I see numerous problems associated with trying to bill licensees for certain reactive work such as investigations, enforcement actions, and incident re-sponse effort. However, reactive inspections are more analogous to routine inspection activity and could logically be combined with the routine effort.

Second, I believe it would make sense to include direct travel time since it is time that must be expended to conduct on-site inspections and is certainly as much a part of the overall inspection activity as writing the inspection report itself. You also proposed to. include IE contractual support dollars.  :

I understand that the program support costs of other offices that are now included in license fee billings are those that can be specifically identi-fied with a given docket. None of our contracts are docket specific. Unless we establish an elaborate accounting mechanism to track contract costs on a per docket basis, I see no way of including any of IE's program support costs.

'You asked me to provide a range of manhours expended at reactors and fuel facilities. 1 have done so for reactors, but I need more time to compute good statistics for the classes of fuel facilities you have specified. I will provide this information to you in the near future.

~ }

A .x

. Victor Stello, J ., Director Office of Inspection ind Enforcement e y

_ . - - = . . . . _ _ _ . _ . _ . . - . . - _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ ___

Ranga ef Inspectica Manpow;r . p;ctcd Per Typical Liccnsee ..~

, For inspections Conducted During FY 1961 . ,'

(Man-llours)

Routine Inspections Reactive Inspections Sa feguards Sa fety, Sa feguards Category Sa fety To From .To From To From From To (170.23 A 170.24)_ . . ,

Power Reactor Sites: 2,865 - 80 270 80, 1.380 0 95 Single Unit 1,220 0 50 1,730 45 155 , US 510 Dual Unit 1,025 0 45 1,345 40 125 150 410 Triple Unit 785 15 0 15 0- 15 15' 45 5 Test and Research Reactors .

Production or Utilization ' .

Facility Licensed for

  • possessfon but not operation  ;. .

~! 6 170.32 1A -

1B

  • 1 C.

l 10

. 1E .

IF .

i 1G l l lIl

. 2A L 2B 2C 4A

_New Categories _

Ore Buying Station .

Ion Exchange facilities

.* '. .' PA*' $

ROUTlHE SAFETY & SAFEGUAROS INSPECTIGH -

i

']9/A4 FtR FYAf a.. _____.. __............................__._______...............

FACILITY TOTAL REGULAR........ .........__ __l DOCKET HO HAME HOURS 0..._____..... 2,768.2 65000313 ARKANSAS I fr.fH3 TOTAL 2,163.0 GETHO TOTAL 05000368 ARKANSAS 2 2,968.5 GETHO TOTAL 05000334 BEAVER VALLEY t 2,142.5 GETHO TOT AL 05000155 BIG ROCK POINT I --

2,717.2 GETHO TOT AL ~ ivc 0259 BROWHS FERRY l f,628.7 GETH0 TOT AL 05000260 BROWHS FERRY 2 f,612.7 KETH0 TOTAL 05000296 BROWHS FERRY 3 2,4 14.0 KETH0 TOTAL 05000325 BRUNSWICK f .

2,359.6 s f n ,. '. , . v .: . . . ,

KETH0 TOTAL 05000324 BRUNSWICK 2 CALVERT CllrF5 1 1,864.0 .

,U/<, ,. S.

Kr.TH0 TOTAL 05000317 ,

t,352.0 ,

'KETH0 TOTAL 05008318 CALVERT CLIFFS 2 2,686.0 KETHO TOTAL 05000385 COOK f i 2,654.5

-KETH0 TOTAL 05000316 COOK 2 i 2,729.0 -

KETH0 TOTAL 05000298 COOPER STATION ,

t 4,585.3 KETHO TOTAL 05000302 CRYSTAL RIVER _1 4,093.8 KETHO TOTAL 05000346 DAVIS-RESSE_t 300.0 KrftlO TOTAL 05000010 DRESDCH I 9,948.5 KETHO TOTAL 05000237 ' DRESOEH 2 -

1,228.5 p'KETHO TOTAL 05000249 DRESDEN 3 3,147.5 KETH0 TOTAL 05000331 DilANE ARNotD FARLEY t 2.139.5 s c 05000348 (KETH0 TOTAL 2,090.0 05000364 FARLEY 2

)KETHOTOTAL 2,788.0 IKETHO TOTAL 05000333 FITZrATRICK b 2,935.5 5KETHO TOTAL 05000285 FORT CALHOUH 1 '.

~

' .1.p .$7 1

I

_ . _ . . . -- .~

7 ,

P A F.t. t 2,

)9/84 .

ROUTINE SAFETY 8 SAFEGUAROS INSPECTION .

FOR FYSI ,

p...___.....__........___.............................____

DOCKET FACILITY , TOTAL REGULAR

  • HD HAME HOURS 3,360.5-ETH3 TOTAL 05000267 FORT ST VRAIH 2,325.5 FTHQ TOTAL 05000244 GIHHA 1,782.0 rifl0 TOTAL 05000213 II ADDAM HECK 1,300.0 EIHO TOTAL 05000321 HATCII I 1,118.0 Eil40 TOTAL 05000366 HATCil 2 116.0 TTil0 TOTAL n5000003 INDIAff P0fMT f 3,023.5

.ETHQ TOTAL 05000247 THDIAH POIk( 2 2,842.5 ETHC TOTAL 05000286 INDIAH POINT 3

  • 3,358.5 ETH0 TOTAL 05000305 KIWAUNfE 2,985.0 ETH0 TOTAL 05000409 LA CROSSE 3,234.0 ETH0 TOTAL 05000309 MAI,HE YANKEE 3,740.5

.ETH0 TOTAL 05000369 MCGUIRE 1 1,984.7 ETH0 TOTAL 05000245 MILLSTONE 1 894.8 ETHD TOTAL 05000336 MILLSTONE 2 2,692.0 ETH0 TOTAL 05000263 MONTICEtto 3,775.0 ETH0 TOTAL 05000220 HI_HE MILE POINT 1 1,945.3 Cit 40 TOTAL 05000338 HORTH ANNA I f,426.2 ETH0 TOTAL 05000339 HORTH ANNA 2 2,083.2 ETH0 TOTAL 05000269 OCONEE 1 1,485.0 ETH0 TOTAL 05000270 OC0 HEE 2 f,578.0 ETH0 TOTAL 05000287 OCONEE 3 2,877.5 ETH0 TOTAL 05000219 OYSTER CREEK 1 3,521.5 TTH0 TOTAL 05000255 PALISADES

-- _ _ m .

r A ct .'3, ROUTINE SAFETY 8 SAFEGUAROS INSPECTION ,

)9/A4 FOR FYAI r 2......... ....... . __.._............_.............__...____......_................................

TOTAL REGtfLAR DOCKET FACTLITY

  • HD IIANE ffollRS

[THO TOTAL 05000277 PEAcil ROTTOM 2 1.378.0 05000278 PEACil ROTTOM 3 f.640.0

)[THOTOTAL 5 3 . ;-

ETH0 TOTAL 05000293 PILGRIM i 2.40A.5 , ,

I'

ETH0 TOTAL 05000266 POINT REACil 1 f.838.$

ETH0 TOTAL 05000303 POINT REACII 2 1.989.5 05000282 PRAIRTE ISLAND f f.633.0 hETH0 TOTAL t,865.5 2ETH0 TOTAL 05000306 PRAIRTE ISLAHO 2

]ETH0 TOTAL 05000254 QUAO CITIES I 2.514.0

[J ['

05000265 .QUAO CITIES 2 2.469.5 , * .

JETH0 TOTAL .- ,.

't ~..

JETH0 TOTAL 05000312 ;RANCI10 SECO f 4.823.5 05000269 _ ROBIN,S0H 2_ 3.446.0 ,

3ETNG TOTAL _

JETH0 TOTAL 05000272 SALEM i 2.602.0 .

05000311 SALEM 2 2.f73.0 GETHO TOTAL GE1HO TOTAL 05000206 S AH_,,0,HOrRE 1 4.714.2 .

GETHO TOTAL 05000327 SEQll0YAH f 2.777.0 IKETH0 TOTAL 05000328 SEQtl0YAll E 4.396.0 05000335 ST titCIE I 4.726.5 (KETH0 TOTAL

  • I 05000280 SURRY f 1.693.6
KETHQ TOTAL f,653.6 KETHQ TOTAL 05000288 SURRY 2 ,

05000289 TIIREE MILE ISLAHO I 5.678.5 KETHO TOTAL 05000320 TilREE MILE ISLAN,D 2, 3.259.5 KETHQ TOTAL KETHD TOTAL 05000344 JRp4A$, 5.872.5 '

f,971.5 KETHO TOTAL 0500e~! 4 TURKEY POINT 3 KCTH0 'L;nt 05000251 TURKEY POINT 4 1.783.0 0

G

P Ar' ,4 99/A4 ROUTINE SAFETY 8 SAFEGUAROS INSPECTION ,'

FOR FYAt FACit!TY TOTAL RECULAR

..e-a DOCKET HOURS ..'

HD HAME .

(ETH3 TOTAL 0500027I VERM3HT_ YANKEE.I 3.160.0 1,967.5 KETHO TOTAL 05000029 YANKEE-ROWE 1 KtfMO TOTAL 05000295 ZION 1 2.717.5 KriHO TOTAL 05000304 ZION 2 2.054.5 e

i

par.r[5

'st/A4 ROUT!HE SAFETY 8 $AFEGUARDS INSPECTION .,,

TO.2 rYAI

,_.____ .....___.____________.____________ _____...________. __ ._____.._______e.____.........__.___...

DOCKET FACILITY TOTAL RLCtiL AR -

HAME Il0llR S .,,,,

HD 189,950.3 6ff D TOTAt e

s e

O e,* *

. - si 4 1, s O

8 44 9 ,

4 e

e e

s

  • l '.

g e

9

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20125C163&oldid=2911506"