ML20125B062
| ML20125B062 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 01/19/1976 |
| From: | Arnold R METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20125B061 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910190521 | |
| Download: ML20125B062 (2) | |
Text
a
.l-
~
~
=.-
r.= f,jgy t
=a
' ^
- l::.~
- - ~ms
_?
^
f,,iTROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY ~. ussimARY OF GCNERAUUCUC UnUNES CoMoRAH FFICE BOX 542 RE ADIN,G, PENNSYLVANI A 19603 TELEPHONE 215 - 929 3601 d?!
s GQL 00h2
~
January 19, 1976
- ggy;.
DVD
- D Tl h
5 A
o N: 2_.S Eff m
==
Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director Office'of Inspection & Enforcement EFF E~
Region I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Com4 ssion 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406
- a@
DOCKr" # 50-289 OPERATING LICENSE # LPR-50 "3
THREE MILE ISLAND I?UCLD.R STATION UNIT 1 (MI-1) il INSPECTION REPORT 75-25
- "l
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
[
This letter and enclosure are in response to your inspection letter j
e of December 24, 1975, concerning Mr. R. Hurd's inspection of C2-1 and the
- .l.]
resultant findings of that inspection.
Ej q
.a Sincerely,
.. fl
)
"~.1 Q (, k
.6.
.:: ~
/
g r
R. C. ARNOLD Vice-President RCA:JMC:rk Enclosure 90012517 m
- j
- l 791.0,19.0
'i a
.=.:
v"
=p x:;:~
~
I' 3 Metropolitan Edison Company
/ Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 1 (TMI-1)
' Docket No. 50-289
..;.[
License.No..DPR-50 D**D
- D'9~
- i~:E:
J'b gh Inspection No. 75-25 oc o
1
.M a
- =
RESPONSE TO DESCRIPTION OF APPARDIT DEFICID?CY
" " ~
1 A.. Contrary to Technical Specification 6.2.3 require =ents for adherence to procedures, the following exa=ples 'of nonce =pliance with procecures 5
vere identified.
1.
Data recording requirements of SP 1303 h.1 vere net =et for tests perforced on July 22, 1975 and Septenter 24, 1975; in that
,. l High Flux bistable input voltage at the trip point was not E g recorded is required by the procedure.
Actual system settings Mj did not exceed Limiting Safety Syste= Settings in this case.
,;=5 2.
The power range anplifier resetting adminis ratively required E
by SP 1302-1.1 to assure setpoint =aintenance within the 3
appropriate range was not accc=plished on August 7,1975
?::g::;
""='
Actual syste= settings did not exceed Li=iting Safety System.
Settings in this case.
p.;
RESPONSE TO APPAREI"" DEFICIE~ ICY A.1
/x
('s)TheInstrumentationandCentrol(ILC)MaintenanceFere=aninvolvedandthe j
Surveillance Coordinator have been counseled regardin's the i=:crtance of a FF"*
~
f thorou6h review of co=pleted data shee s to ensure all infor=ation'has been recorded.
Lack of a clear delineation of the data block in the procedure, SP 1303 h.1, was a factor centributing to this cccurrence.. The procedure 'nas 'been f.
reyised so as to address this concern.
d RESPOUSE TO AP"ARENT DuiC'IIHCY A.2 The major cause of this occurrence was the discrepancy in the acceptance criteria between the body of the procedure and the data sheet.
This has been corrected.
={]
A The Shift Foreman involved has been counseled regarding the i=portance of following the detailed procedure steps rather than relying only en data
.=5 sheet information.
d, The corrective actions listed should be. suffic'ient to ensure full compliance and no further action is planned.
p
=
l 3
-1 Q
90012518 u
o u
H
- w.
j