ML20125A905
| ML20125A905 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/23/1992 |
| From: | Shelton B NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| To: | Lesar M NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19341F781 | List: |
| References | |
| FRN-57FR38588, RULE-PR-19, RULE-PR-20 AE21-2-003, AE21-2-3, NUDOCS 9212090119 | |
| Download: ML20125A905 (2) | |
Text
p pQ_
h-
/
"'o,,
UNITED STATES NUCLEsR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~ ~ ~
n
- f W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 0
4
%, '..... /
QUL 2 31992 MEMORAND"M FOR:
Michael T. Lesar, Chief Rules Review Section Regulatory Publications Branch Division of Freedom of Information and Publications Services /ADM FROM:
Brenda Jo. Shelton, Chief Information a A Records Management Branch
(
Division of Information Support Services /IRM
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR COMMENT AND CONCURRENCE ON THE FINAL RULE, "10 CFR PARTS 19 AND 20: STANDARDS FOR PROTECTION AGAINST RADIATION; EXTENSION OF IMPLEMENTATION DATE" In response to your subject memorandum, the Information and Records Management Branch (IRMB)-provides the following:
The Paperwork Reduction Act Statement (PRAS) is correct.
._ L. Change the PRAS to statement number as indicated in the enclosed.
_N/A The "Information Collection Requirements: OMB Approval" section is correct.
Add / Change the "Information Collection Requirements: OMB Approval" scution.
Do not publish the " Federal Register Notice" until further notice.
X The " Federal Register..c 1" can be published.
Enclosed is a copy of the IRMB memorandum to the program office addressing our concerns.
A copy of tN IRMB memorandum to the program office addressing our concerns wiil be forwarded at a later date.
X An IRMB memorandum to the program office is not required.
/
a o.
el.
n,
/nformationan
' ords Management Branch Division of InformatTOTr-Stpport -Services /IRM cc: S. Hudson, OFS
during which Agreement States could still be enforcing the existing Part 20 while llRC would be requiring adherence to the revised Part 20.
Environmental Impact:
Categorical Exclusion a
I The f1RC has determined that this propos/
ed rule is the type of M. inn described in categorical exclusion 10 CFR 51.22(c)(2):
an adminis W ' /.s action that will nct result in any hardship.
Therefore, neither an environmental impact statement nor an environmental assessment has been prepared for this proposed rule.
. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement d
Thispropo1Iedruledoesnotcontainaneworamendedinformation
~
/
collection requirement subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Existing requirements, including requirements contained in sections 20.1001 - 20.2401, published on May 21, 1991, were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, approval number 3150-0014j wu d 315~C - CON, l
Regulatory Analysis The prppo /
i sed amendment is administrative and will not have a significant impact; therefore, the Commission has not prepared a regulatory analysis on this regulation.
The final regulatory analysis for the final rule that was 6
- -.,,