ML20125A905
| ML20125A905 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/23/1992 |
| From: | Shelton B NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| To: | Lesar M NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19341F781 | List: |
| References | |
| FRN-57FR38588, RULE-PR-19, RULE-PR-20 AE21-2-003, AE21-2-3, NUDOCS 9212090119 | |
| Download: ML20125A905 (2) | |
Text
p pQ_ h-
/ "'o,,
' UNITED STATES !
~ ~ ~
-!" n NUCLEsR REGULATORY COMMISSION 0
- f4 W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
%, '..... / QUL 2 31992 MEMORAND"M FOR: Michael T. Lesar, Chief Rules Review Section Regulatory Publications Branch
! Division of Freedom of Information and Publications Services /ADM FROM: Brenda Jo. Shelton, Chief Information a A Records Management Branch
( Division of Information Support Services /IRM
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR COMMENT AND CONCURRENCE ON THE FINAL RULE, -
"10 CFR PARTS 19 AND 20: STANDARDS FOR PROTECTION '
AGAINST RADIATION; EXTENSION OF IMPLEMENTATION DATE" In response to your subject memorandum, the Information and Records Management Branch (IRMB)-provides the following:
The Paperwork Reduction Act Statement (PRAS) is correct.
._ L . Change the PRAS to statement number as indicated in the enclosed.
_N/A The "Information Collection Requirements: OMB Approval" section is correct.
Add / Change the "Information Collection Requirements: OMB Approval" scution.
Do not publish the " Federal Register Notice" until further notice.
X The " Federal Register ..c 1" can be published.
Enclosed is a copy of the IRMB memorandum to the program office addressing our concerns.
A copy of tN IRMB memorandum to the program office addressing our concerns wiil be forwarded at a later date.
X An IRMB memorandum to the program office is not required.
/ .
' . a o. el . n,
/nformationan ' ords Management Branch Division of InformatTOTr-Stpport -Services /IRM cc: S. Hudson, OFS
- l during which Agreement States could still be enforcing the existing Part 20 while llRC would be requiring adherence to the revised Part 20.
a Environmental Impact: Categorical Exclusion I l The f1RC has determined that this propos/ed rule is the type of M. inn described in categorical exclusion 10 CFR 51.22(c)(2): an adminis W ' / .s action that will nct result in any hardship. Therefore, neither an environmental impact statement nor an environmental assessment has been prepared for this proposed rule.
. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
- d Thispropo1Iedruledoesnotcontainaneworamendedinformation
~
/
collection requirement subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing requirements, including requirements contained in sections 20.1001 - 20.2401, published on May 21, 1991, were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, approval number 3150-0014j wu d 315~C - CON, l
Regulatory Analysis .
i
- The prpposed/ amendment is administrative and will not have a significant impact; therefore, the Commission has not prepared a regulatory analysis on this regulation. The final regulatory analysis for the final rule that was 6
- - . , ,