Text

Performance Indicators,Aug 1992
	ML20118B836
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	08/31/1992
From:	; OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20118B835	List: ML20118B834; ML20118B836;
References
	NUDOCS 9210080010
	Download: ML20118B836 (112)
	v • d • e

.

s u,.m, /, jl_ m'.

m _ a' m - m m m m m

.=.a m'ar 4

~-

r 4.

+

y FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANC E INDICATORS AUGUST 1992 F

+_

a '1' N

_ N g

m'Mf Lljj f Dj

} % x' 4

Etta Aj'l yjLamunasq4L is o s c e': 'M nM g. n....r-x ?g ~e taymy sppjsssa+azgw==g;; g, _

[j.u

.!IllHIH1 M ~p e s ;75;:w n=; c.

1 -

co Es s_ujJ l

7 ; ~.. j g 1

}*KF Prepared by:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group 92100G0010 920928 PDR ADOCK 05000205 R

PDG

_a_

._%2 m..ue

. +-

m

_.w.. _.

I G

. 9.

d wwolva. wisdorn, aoul sownd jub,riwnl...

d w a, ofdians, cwawA,ag cornandownl...

d w a, ww,, of ofs...d w do&ng, Uw, job

.agu u. p wns, - p,..

a w wuna-dua9 nel Uw, taall of abuwl, piissww,, a w owu own 4 wed wh ws ans anul Un piads aaul sahqhdian UwL corns lmn, !>&ng, Uw, <d M knd of 9

pasos, voijud on, do&ng, Uw dyklCainy.

Jaans ).6 % s W

w

--,,, - -,,= -

,,e,,

a

d i

i OA1AllA PUllLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORh1ANCE INDICATORS REPORT Prepared By:

Production Engineering Division

+

System Engineering Test and Performance Group L

AUGUST 1992 o

l,- v. ~

.-..__.-.,_,.,,-_........_.m.__,__

Tab e of Contents / Summary INPO INDUSTRY KEY P AR At/ETERS PAGE i.3.n n.

m g

UN E P ' '",

Z IM'E !*OPH L4gt 6,spapq g

\\.

UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7,000 HOURS CRITICAL 0 63 0.

7 08 5 09

.NMA.

.3 SAFETY SYSTEJ PERFORMANCE ir.aca..

HIGH PRESSURE St ?ETY INJECTION SYSTEM.

. 0 0014 0 00s 00007 00-NA

,6 AUXILIARY PEEDWATER SYSTEM.

0 0c34.

0 01 0 0012.

. 0 0027.

.. N A

.7 EMERGEteli AC POWER SYSTEM.

. 0 00c5

. 0 024.

0 0019 00.

NA.

B THERMAL PERFORMANCE.

. 99 c%

993%

99 72,..

99 c%.

. l..

10 UN. CAPABILITY FACTOR.

84 1%

E9 2%

C 0%-

34 0 %

I..

.12 UNPLANNED CAPABlt Y LOSS FACTOR..

.187%.

45%

33%.

66 0 %.

l..

.13 FUEL REllABILITY INDICATOR mxu nm

.NA.

75 104.67510-4 NA NA.

.15 COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE toe se m 11e sYR

50- (R -. 239 9-23c5 NA 16 h

VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE tc Lc ti 2.118 SYR 3 OnYR - Ese 1.

.8390

. N A..

.17 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENi RATE' DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE.

. 0 16 03 1 26 1 12 A.

.18 L

CHEMISTRY INDEX/ SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY.

. 0 20.

0 45.

.NA 0 56.

N A... 45 OPER ATIONS p3 g RCS

_CEE2.

CEE2 y Tu'e97NTu gETpmPH Tg UDPEp %

r STATION NET GENERATION (10.000 MWh).

.NA.

. 21.9 10 3.

.. l..

.1 FORCED OUTAGE RATE.

. 0 25%.

24%.

.19 6%.

12 9 %.

.A,

.2 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7,000 CRITICAL HOURS.

. 0 63.

.O 7 08.

5 E9.

NMA.

.3 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTU ATIONS - (INPO DEFINITION).

.0.

.0-0.

1.

l..

.4 UNPLANNED S AFETY SYSTEM ACTL"TIONS - (NRC DE A 41 TION).

..c.

.3.

1 2.

_. l.

.5 GROSS HEAT RATE.

.. W A NA 10 335.

10 480 5 1.

.9 r-EQUlVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR.

.. N A.

NA 643%

. 34 4 %

l..

.11 UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR.

~ e41%

69 2%

E2 0%

34 0 % -

.I-12 g

UNPL

'ED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR..

.157%.

. 4 5%

S%.

. 66 0%.

.l.

.13 PLANNED C APABILITY LOSS FACTOR.

.. N A.

. 26 3%.

0% -.

.0*'..-

N A..

.14 t

r -

4 r

i E

4 b

T OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT

+

t Prepared By:

Production Engineering' Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group AUGUST 1992 1

=J r

+s c

.s-

-.ewg-r w

er S

-e yi w

-wres.m+

mwe m

wi g

ABSTRACT-PURPOSE The ' Performance Indicators Program" is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant perfor-mance information to OPPD's pe'sonnel responsible for optimizing unit periormance. The information is presented in a way that provices ready identification of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals The information can be used for assessing and monitoring Fort Calhoun's ptant perf ormance, with emphasis on saf ety and reliability. Some performance indicators show company goals or industry information. This information can be used for comparison or as a means o' promoting pride and motivation.

OC.0E.E The conditions, goals, and projections reflected within tnis report are current as of the end of the t'1onth being reported. Unless otherwise stated.

In order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines sere followed while implementing the program:

1) Data was selected which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.

2) Established corporate goals and indus'ry information were in0luded for comparison.

3) Formal definitions were developed for each performance parameter to ensure consistency in future reports and allow comparison with industry averages where appropriate.

Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report. Please refer comments to the System Engineering Department's Test and Performance Group To increase personnel awareness of Fort Calhoun Station's plant performance, it is suggested that this report be distributed throughout your respective departments.

REFERENCES INPO Good Practices OA-102, " Performance Monitoring - Management Information" INPO Report Dated November 1984,

Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data

NUMARC 87-00," Guidelines and Technical Bases for NUMARO Initiatives Addressiiy Station Black out at Light Water Reactors", Revision 1, Appendix D. "EDG Reliability Program", dated April 6,1990.

Table of Contents / Summary lNPO INDUSTRY KEY P AR AMETERS EASE

.n av

.2?. 2.

Cf*2 u m o en g2r,;, ime tems LAsT tems a UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7,000 HOURS CRITICAL..

o E3.

,o.

7 oB

. 5 69.

.NMA.

.3 SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE ow*a.

.c HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM.

..o 0014 ~

.ooos-oo007.

Oo.

NA.

.6 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM.

..o cc341

.o 01.

. o 0012.

..o 0027.

.NA.

.7 EMERGENCY AC POUR SYSTEM.

..oocc$.

.OC24,

.o0019

. o o..

. NA.

.8 THERMAL PERFORMANCE.

..99 em

. 99 as _99 7W.

99 c%.

. l... 10 UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR.

641%

69 2%.. 02 0 %

34 0 %.

l..

.12 UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR,.

.187E.

45%.

. 33%.

66 0%.

i..

,13 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR mom..

ras. _._... N A.

. 7 5:10-4. 6 75x10-4.

.NA.

NA.

.15 j

COLLECTIVE HADIATION EXPOSURE fo.-cuem ~118 SNA.. 2SONR 239 9.

236 5,

.NA.

.16 l

VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID l

RADIOACTIVE WASTE teve,c t:j-.

2.118 SN A

3. coo /YR -. 8631.

. 839 0..

N A...17 I

INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT RATE' DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE -

.o 10,

. o 3,

,1 26.

I 12.

.A.

.18 CHEMISTRY INDEXSECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY.

. 0 20.

. 0 45.

.. N A.

, 0 56.-

N A...45 OPERATIONS E! AGE -

t*D 'S T RY

.C2.C2.

Q"?2 UopEn aes m Twe ?ampy t_Ast p.estry T3 STATION NET GENERATION (10.00c Mwh)..

.. N A..

. NA..

. 21.9.

. 10 3..

...,...l..

.1 FORCED OUTAGE RATE.

...o 25%..

.24%

.18 6%.

,12 9%.

.A.

,.2 l

UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR l

SCRAMS PER 7,000 CRITICAL HOURS.

..o C3.

.0.

. 7 os.

. 5 69.

_NMA.

.3 i

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM l-ACTUATIONS - (INPO DEFINITION)..

.... o -

.. o.

. o -.

.1.

. I..

.4 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM l

ACTUATIONS - (NRC DEFINITION).

.. o.,

3.

.1.-

.2.

. l......, 5 i

L GROSS HEAT RATE.

..NA..

.NA.

.10.335.

10.480 5.

.. l ;.

.9 EQUlVALENT nVAILABILITY FACTOR.

.. N A,

JA.

64 3A

. 34 4%.

.. l..

.11 I

UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR.

. 841%..

E' os

, 3 4.o.,.

. l..

.12 UNPLANNEE aPABiLITY LOSS FACTOR..

.1 B7E.

.t ; i 38%.

66 o %

.. l..

.13 PLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR.

..NA.

. 26 3%.

.oi.

. 0%.

.. N A..

.14 l

OPER ATIONS (cont'd)-

P1GE emn.ar

.cnen.

cren unaro %

m Tws usNm tatt u unn a_

FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR (mierocuries/ gram)...N A ;

. 7 L. 0-4 6 75:104.

.. N A -

_ NA..

.15-DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT (mmh).

..NA.

.1495-

, NA.

.. N A.,

-, N A...19 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1,000 CRITICAL HOURS..

..NA 0 2..

.1 69.

.1 22.

.A.

. 20 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET.

..NA.

N A..

NA.

, N A..

. N A... 21 DOCUMENT REVIEW..

..NA.

NA

. NA.

.NA.

. N A... 22 MAINTENAN2 PAGE tunerTov

.gf.og, coon UDM o *%

M M Q Q LASTP50*UH M

EMERGEN';Y DIE SEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY.

.NA -

.NA.

NA.

..NA._

. N A... 23.

DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS).

..NA.

. <4

.. N A -..

NA..

. N A.,. 2 4 DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY mJam nrs ) NA..

. c210 8 'DG., _ NA -

NA_

.NA...25

/sGE OF OU TSTANDING MAINTEN ANCE WORK ORDERS (CO"tRECTIVE NON OUTAGE).

..NA.

,,NA.

.. N A.

.. N A..

.. N A... 26 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON. OUTAGE).

..N A..

.. N A..

. NA..

.. NA.

..NMA. c.27 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON-OUTAGE)..

..NA=

.. NA.

, 70 2%..

. 56 3%.

.J

. 28 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE.

,.N A..

.65%.

_551%.

. 416%.

..NMA.. 29 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE..

..NA.

_0.5%.... 0 19%..

. 0.17%.

.D.

. 30 NUMBER OF OUT OF. SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS.

m.NA.

.. < 13..

.11.

. 10.

D.

. 31 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME..,.

..NA.

.10%.

. 22 7%..

.22 8%.

.. NMA. 32 PROCEDUR AL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)..

,.NA.

., NA.

.0.

_1.

l.

. 33 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE)..

.NA..

. 8 0%..

.. N A.

.. NA...

. 34.

.. u PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE EQUIPMENT)..

..N A -.

. 80%..

N A..

, N A..

.. N A... 35 ii

1 M AiNTENANCE -(cont'd))

fLA.GE riouriny m

m Unprn.%

g Twg p3 Spy t agv pfyfty g

PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (GENERAL MAINTENANCE).

.. N A.

.80%

.. NA.

.. N A..

.. N A.,. 36 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE).

.. N A..

.80%.

. NA.

. nam

.. N A.. 37 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL).

.. N A..

.80%

NA.

. N A..

. N A... 38 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLI NCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS.

.NA.

.0.

D.

. 0.

.l.

39 COMPONENT FAILURE ANALYSIS REPORT (CFAR)

SUMMARY

.. N A.

NA.

.NA.

NA

,A.

. 40 NUMBER OF NPRDS MULTIPLE FAILURES.

.. NA.

.. N A..

.NA.

.. N A..

NA.

41 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS.

,. NA.

. N A..

.NA.

NA-

.. NA

.42 CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE.

.. NA.

. 2 00E-6. 616E.7

. 619E-7.

.. N A,

. 43 CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PRETECTION PAGE PiSUSTDY M

UDDFDt%

C,QAL TH'S n.sy1TH t AET 93NITH E

COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE (person rem).

.118 5/YR. 250NR. 239 9.

. 236 5..

.NA.

.16 VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE.

.,2.118 5'YR. 3.000/YR... 8681.

.8390,.

..i N A..,.17 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISThY..

. 0 20.,

. 0 45.. 0 561%..

.0.557%.

..N M A.. 44 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT,

..NA.

2%.

2 13 %

1.0G%.

.. NMA.. J 45 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS.

.. N A.

. N A..

.0%

. 0%..

..l.

. 45 IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE.

.. N A.

.6.

23..

. 24.

. NMA.. 47 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED.

.. N A.

.0.

.O.

.. N A.... 48 M' XIMUM INDIVIDUAL r4ADIATION EXPOSURE (mrem),

.. N A...

.1.500/YR, 1.743.

. 1.707..

.. N M A.. 49 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS.

.. NA.

144

.253.

248.

.. N M A,. 50

.. -. - ~.

CHEMISTRY AND R ADIOLOGIC AL PROTEC.'QM (Cont'd)

EAGE y m.ierpy g.

g L'DPE A "%

2 T @ ? US'N H U.S T 4 8SNT H TREND DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA.

.. N A.

EE%.. 87.2 Y...

. 87.0%.

..NMA.. 51 RADIOLOGICAL WORK "RACTICES PROGR AM.

.. N A..

NA-

,1 11.

l.

. 52.

NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS.

..NA. remove 1/mo.. 72..

. 68.

.. D.

. 53 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEIN3 DISCH ARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT (curies)..

.. NA.

340/yr

.140 7.

. 140 7.

NA... 54 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT (curies).

..NA.

. 225/yr.

. 39 5.

. 39 5..

N A... 55

$fCURITY EAGE r n..evnv s

3 ocorn m%

m Tws vouTH tArv voyTH m LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY).

.. N A..

.. N A.

.18..

32.

. l... 56 SECURITY NON. SYSTEM FAILURES.

..N A,

.. N A..

.NA, N A..

.. N A.. 57 SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES.,

,, N A.

NA.

.NA,

.. N A..

..NA.. 58 M ATERt ALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES EAGE INOUTTnY OS QDfD D

UDPE A '?%

E TWS US*JTM LA.ST 4ASyTH

{Df(tQ AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON. OUTAGE)..

.... N A.

. 3 5%..

30%

.20%,

.D.

. 59 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE ($ million)..

.. N A.

. NA.

.12 6.

12 6.

.. N A.. 60 SPARE PARTS ISSUED ($ thousands)..

.. N A..

. 154.1.

,199.0.

.. NA.

t INVENTORY ACCURACY,

.. N A..

.98%

.= 100%.,

.100%,

.. NA.. 61 STOCKOUT RATE.

.. N A.

. 2 6%... 0 32%.

. 0 32%.... N A.. 61 EXPEDITED PURCHASES..

..N A.

.05%....0%.

.1 8%.

. l..

. 62 INVOICE BREAKDOWN.

.. NA..

. NA..

..NA.

.. N A..

..NA.

, 63 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING..

.. N A._

,. N A.

. 59 3%..

59.3%.

..N A.. 63 DESIGN ENGINEERING PAGE rnousTny cDf cDDD TM UDDFD M%

C Tw9 USNTH LA?T USNTH OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS..

.. N A..

.. NA.

160.

.173.

.. l.... 64 iv

~.. -

DESIGN ENG!NEER!NG (cont'd) ffG.E t'aurinv m

m Unnrn. %

m in.s in.ns tAsT evenH In.rno TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS.

(EXCLUDING SCAFFO'. DING).

..NA.

. 0..

.18.

. 17.

. NA.. 65 ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST (EAR) BREAKDOWN,

..m..

.. N A.

..NA;

.133.

181.

,.. N A... 66 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS.

.. N A.

. NA.

.151

,169.

NA.. 67 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN... N A

.. N A.

NA.

. 68 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY gjpg

!Nou's Y n y Q2fC m

genr D m m TH s esens tar' ve*nH IB,t.c Dis ABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE...o 16.

03.

.1 26.

1.12

.A.

.18 RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CA3ES FREQUENCY RATE.

.. N A.

. 2 0,

.32S 3 08 A.

. 69 HLIM AN RESOURCES PAGE

!*!OUS T D V QDDQ QL-D,2 UPDEP'A M TH'? 6.*O*nd L A ET MO*fiH TREND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERs.

.. N A._

..NA.

.1.

.0.

,. D.. 70 LER ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN..,

.. N A.

.NA.

..NA..

.. N A.. 71 STAFFING LEVEL.

.. N A.

..NA..

.NA.

.. NA

.72 PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE.

.. N A,

..NA.

. NA.

. N A.

NA.

.72 TR AINING AND QU AllFIC ATION PIIG.E

!*lSUT Y P V E

CffC UDDED* %

Q Tw!? SD*FH L AET UONTH 10 3 LICENSED OPERATOR REQU ALIFICATION TRAINING.,

.. NA.

. N A,.

.. NA.

. N A..

. N A... 73 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS..

.. N A.

. NA.

N A..

.. N A.

,,74 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS.

.. N A.

, N A..

.1.39 5..

.1A61.

,NA.

. 75 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING..

.. N A.

. 4.768.

5 6a0.

.. N A... 76 v

OUALRY ASSUR ANCE 11GE mUrThy cn.p2 ccena UDPER "*'.

2 TH'O 8~*NH LAe7 USNTH f

M.

VIOLATIONS PER 1.000 INSPECTION HOURS..

.. N A..

1. 5..

2 70.

~ 3 73.

Nf 1A..77 COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV PLANTS.

..NA.

. NA.

.NA.

.. N A... 78 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVE. MONTH RUNNING TOTAL).

.NA.

. N A.-

.1 S*2.

-,16'3.

.NA.

. 79 OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS.

.. NA.

.NA.

. 76.

..72 D.,. 80 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS..

.. NA,

.NA-

. 0/0 -

m 1/3 NA_.81 CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIF. CARS vs.

NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs.

LERs REPORTED..

.. NA.

, NA NA.

NA

.NA

. 82 REFUEt ING OUTAGE INousTRY coo.2 0E2.2 UDDER W.

Q2AL TH!! MONTH LA?T MNITH TREND MWO PLANNING STATUS..

.. N A -.

NA...

..NA.

..NA..

.... NA 83 OVERALL PROJECT STATUS.

.. NA ~,...... N A N A...........N A e.

...,.. N A

. 84 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 15 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING.

.. N A NA

.,..,m..NA...... N A..

.. N A..

.,85 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS..

. 86 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX.

. 94 REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST.

. 96 -

SUMM ARY SECTION POSITIVE TREND REPORT.

. 97 ADVERSE TREND REPORT..

. 97 INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT.

. 97 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES.

. 99 TABLE OF CONTENTS'SUMM ARY TREND SYMBOLS A - ADVERSE TREND I-IMPROVED PERFORMANCE D - DECLINING PERFORMANCE NMA - NEEDS MANAGEMENT ATTENTION NA - NOT APPLICABLE /AVAILABLE l

Vi l

t

O Net Generation (10.000 Mw hours) 50_

40-

-4 g

33, 3 3c 37 f-

"8

A 68 Cyde 14 30 3

Refuel!n9 2u2 23.15 d

Qgt3gg 21.99 g20-13 28 g

~

10=27 6

g

~

y?

0, Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 STATION NET GENERATION During the month of August 1992, a net total of 219,932 MWH was generated by the Fort Calhoun Station. Unplanned energy losses for the month were a result of the following two forced outages: 1) on 8/5/92 a feeder breaker to the 125V do panet Al-41 A failed resulting in a controlled shutdown to Mode 2. The turbine generator was synchronized to the grid on 8/6/92; 2) on 8/22/92 an AC/DC converter failed in the Turbine Electro Hydraulic Control system. Pressurizer safety valve RC-142 then opened prior to reaching design pressure and the plant tripped on TM/LP The plant was shutdown for the remainder of the month.

Unplanned energy 1osses for the month of July were a result of the forced outage that occurred on 7/3/92 due to the loss of an inverter and the subsequent reacter trip. The generator was brought on-line at 0610 hours0.00706 days 0.169 hours 0.00101 weeks 2.32105e-4 months on 7/23.

During the month of June 1992 unplanned energy losses were a result of a forced outage that occurred on 6/1/92 due to a dropped control rod. The plant was returned to 100% power on 6/4/92.

The station was returned to service after the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage when the reactor was taken critical on 5/1/92 at 1035 hours0.012 days 0.288 hours 0.00171 weeks 3.938175e-4 months and the_ generator was put on-line on l

5/3/92, A forced outage occurred on 5/14/02 when the turbine generator tripped on a false high level moisture separator trip signal which caused a simultaneous reactor trip.

The reactor was returned to critical and the generator was put on-line on 5/15/92.

l Unplanned energy losses for May were: 1) the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage extension: 2) the reduction to 58% power for repair of an inoperable. condenser valve: 3) the reactor 1 trip; 4) the hold at 48% power for repair on a feedwater pump suction valve; and 5) the

- 5/31 dropped control rod caused by a faulty clutch coil.

Data Source: Station Generation Report Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 1

l 4

~

Forced Outage Rate IGooDI

-O-1991 & 1992 Fo 1 Calhoun Goa!s y

20%

--O-1991 hdustry Upper 10 Percentile (0.25%)

15% -

9.7 9.3 10W W

'T~

w w:

sy_

,% M $

p p

Q Q

O O

1 0,

i i

'89 '90 '91 Sep91 Oct tJov Dec Jan Feb idar Apr IAay Jun Jul Aug92 FORCED OUTAGE RATE The forced outage rate was reported as 18.6% for the twelve months frorn 9/1/91 to 8/31/92.

The fo!!owing two forced outages occurred during the month of August 1992: 1) on 8/5/92 the turbine was taken off line to replace a feeder breaker to the 125V de panel Al 41 A. The turbine generator was synchronized to the grid on 8/6/92; 2) on 822/92 an AC/DC converter failed in the Turbine Electro Hydraulic Control system. Pressurizer safety valve RC 142 then opened prior to reaching design pressure and the plant tripped on TtNLP. The plant was shutdown for the remainder of the month.

A forced outage caused by the loss of an inverter and the subsequent reactor trip occurred on 7/

3/92. Additionally, RC-142 opened and failed to reclose. The generator was brought on line at 0610 hours0.00706 days 0.169 hours 0.00101 weeks 2.32105e-4 months on 7/23/92.

A forced outage occurred on 6/1/92 when the unit was shutdown due to a dropped control rod.

The generator was brought on-line at 0852 on 6/2/92.

A forced outega occurred on 5/14/92 at 1557 hours0.018 days 0.433 hours 0.00257 weeks 5.924385e-4 months when the turbine generator tripped on a f alse high levei moisture separator trip signal which caused a simultaneous reactor trip. The generator was brought on-line at 1150 hours0.0133 days 0.319 hours 0.0019 weeks 4.37575e-4 months at 5/15/92 following repairs.

During the months of September and October 1991 a forced outage occurred when the station batteries were declared inoperable. The generator was taken off line on 9/12/91 and remained off line until 10/6/91.

The generator was taken off line on October 18 & 19,1991 due to a steam leak on a turbine control valve before seat drain line. The generator was again taken off line on October 25 & 26 due to a steam leak from an instrument tap on the high pressure turbine.

The 1992 and 1991 Fort Calhoun goals for Forced Outage Rate are 2.4%

Data Source: Month Operations Report & NERC GAD Forms Accountability: Patte.,on Adverse Trend: An advers e trend is indicated based on four consecutive months of declining per' rmance.

2

FCs Reactor Scrams Per 7,000 Hours Critcal(Year to date)

-+- FCS Reactor Scrams Per 7,000 Hours Crit.ca!(for the last 30 months)

-O-1991 & 1992 rort Ca! noun Goals

-b.-

1995 INPO Industry Goal 10-

. O-Industry Upper 10% (O C3 per 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months critical ovei a 3G month time penod) 8-6-

4-2-

0 D,U U,U,U U,'., N =j=h

)--

Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jsn Jul Aug92 S-4-

0 Number of FCs neactor scrams 3-2-

1 1

1 0 0 0 0 1-0 0

0 0

[--)

0 T-' 1 l-- 1 i i I

i 0 i

i i

i

'88 '89 '90'91 sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7,000 HOURS CRITICAL The upper graph shows the number of unplanned automatic reactor scrams per 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months critical (as defined in INPO's 11/91 publication " Detailed Descriptions of international Nuclear Power Plant Performance indicators and Other Indicators") for Fort Calhoun Station. This value is calculated by multiplying the total number of scrams in a specified time period by 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months , then dividing that number by the total number of critical hours in the same time period. The year-to-date station value is 7.08 and the value for the last 36 mcnths is 1.08 for the month of August 1992. The lower graph shows the number of unplanned automatic reactor scrams that occurred during each month for the last twelve months.

There was one unplanned automatic reactor scram in August 1992. This scram occurred on August 22 as a result of the failure of an AC/DC converter in the Turbine Electro Hydraulic Control system. Pressurizer safety valve RC 142 then opened prior to reaching design pres-sure and the plant tripped.

There was one unplanned automatic reactor scram in July 1992. This scram occurred on July 3 at 2336 as a result of the loss of Invcrter No. 2.

There was one unplanned automatic reactor scram in May 1992. This scrar,i occurred on May 14 at 1557 when the turbine generator tripped on a false high level moisture separator trip signal which caused a simultaneous reactor trip. The last unplanned automatic reactor scram prior to this occurred on July 2,1986.

The 1992 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams per 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months critical has been set at zero. The 1995 INPO industry goalis one unplanned automatic reac;cr scram per 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months critical. The industry upper ten percentile value is approximately 0.63 scrams per 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months critical for a 36 month time period.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 3

3-gi. Safety System Actuations

-O-1992 Fort Calhoun Goal O

Industry Upper 10 Percentile 2-I 1

1-

)

.l l

I

,0 O

,O O, O O

O O

3-g i

i i

i

'89 '90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 j

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEf.1 ACTUATIONS -(INPO DEFINITION)

There were no unplanned safety system actuations during the month of Auguct 1992, There was one unplanned safety system actuation during the month of July 1992 due to.

the loss of an inverter and the subsequent reactor trip on 7/3/92.

The 1992 goal for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is zero.

The industry upper ten percentile value for the number of unplanned safety system actuations per year is zero.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountabiiity: Jaworski/Foley/Ronning Adverse Trend: None 4

10-12 Month Running Tctal SsA 1000

-O-Critical Hours O

Safety System Actuations (ssA) 8-800 g

700 h$

I c-600 $

a R

a j

g i

500 Q 4

Q f

.g 3

$4-

/

5

00 M

300 V

f z, m2-200 100

~

3 $

o

,,o C

0

'89 '90 '91 SONDJ FMAM J J A SONDJ FMAMJ J A 1990 1991 1992 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS-(NRC DEFINITION)

This indicator shows the number of unplanned safety system actuations (SSAs) which include the High and Low Pressure Safety injection Systems, the Safety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classification of SSAs in-cludes actuations when major equipment is operated and whnn the logic systems for these safety systems are challenged.

An unplanned safety system actuation occurred on August 22,1992 due to the failure of an AC/DC converter in the Turbine Electro Hydraulic Control system. Pressunzer safety valve RC-142 then opened prior to reaching design pressure during a plant transient and trip.

Two unplanned safety system actuations occurred in July 1992: 1) On July 3 there was an inverter failure and the subsequent reactor trip; 2) On July 23 there was unplanned diesel generator start when an operator performing a surveillance test inadvertently pushed the normal start button instead of the alarm acknowledge button.

An unplanned safety system actuation occurred on May 14,1992 when the turbine generator tripped on a false high level moisture separator trip signal which caused a simultaneous reactor trip and subsequent anticipatory start signal to both diesel genera-tors.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a maximum of three.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Jaworski/Foley/Ronning Adverse Trend: None 5

t O

1932 Mon'hiv %gh Prossurs Safety injection System Unava 'abihty Valvo

-M

.1992 High Pressure Safoty injection Systern Unavailabmry Valvo Year to Dato

-O-1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals

--.s0.--

1991 r+gh Prossure Safoty injection System Unavailabihty Valvo Year-to-Date

-A - 1995 INPO Industry Goal (O O2)

-D.

Industry iJpper t o*4 (o 0014) 0.025 -

0.02 -

A A- - A A-A A-6-

-A

--A 0.015 -

Cycle 14 Refuehng 0 01 -

C O-O-

Outage N

C O

O O

O.005 - ",

0-SopD1 Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the High Pressure Safety injection System unavailability value, as defined by INPO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the reput-ing month.

The High Pressure Safety injection System unavailability value for August 1992 was 0.0007, The 1992 year-to-date HPSI unavailability value was 0.0017 at the end of August. There were 1.1 hours1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months of planned unavailability for surveillance tests in August.

In July there were no (zero) hours of planned or unplanned unavailability; in June there were 1.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months of planned unavailability for surveillance tests and in May there were 1.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months of planned unavailability for surveillance tests.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 0.008. The 1995 INPO industry goalis 0.02 and the industry upper ten percentile value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91) is approximately 0.0014.

Data Source: Jaworski/Schaffer Accountability: Jaworski/Sc.'1affer Adverse Trend: None 6

awde L'~.l 1992 Monthly Aux!hary Fosdwater Sy> tem Unavailabikty value

-M--.1992 Auxiliary Feedwater System Unavailabihty value Year to-cate

--O-1991 & 1992 For1 Calhoun Goa!s

+ 1991 Aurihary Feodwa'or Sptem Unavailabihty value Year.to date

-A-1995 ItJPO Industry Goal

-{")-

Industry Upoer 10% (0,0034) 0.025-A A- -A A-A A- -A - A A

o.02 -

C

-O O

0015~

Cycle 14 Refuehng o.01 -

Outage C

O O

O-

'M 0.005-W '

N O

O O

O C

O O

O

^

f~~'1 O

Sep91 Oct tJov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Auxiliary Feedwater System Unavailability value, as defined by INPO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the reporting month.

The Auxiliary Feedwater System Unavailability Value for August 1992 was 0.0012. The 1992 year to-date AFW unavailability value was 0,0049 at the end of August.

There were 1.2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months of planned unavailability for surveillance tests in August.

There were 1.6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months of planned unavailability for surveillance tests in July.

In June 1992 there were 2.82 hours9.490741e-4 days 0.0228 hours 1.35582e-4 weeks 3.1201e-5 months of planned unavailability for a PM and 7.33 hours3.819444e-4 days 0.00917 hours 5.456349e-5 weeks 1.25565e-5 months of unplanned unavai! ability for corrective maintenance on a flow instrument.

In May 1992 preventive maintenance activities resulted in 2.67 hours7.75463e-4 days 0.0186 hours 1.107804e-4 weeks 2.54935e-5 months of planned un-availability and there were 10.9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months of unplanned unavailability due to corrective maintenance following the initial attempt to perform a PM.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 0.01. The 1995 INPO industry goalis 0.025 and the industry upper ten percentile value (for the three year period from 1/t39 through 12/91) is approximately 0.0034.

Data Source: Jaworski/Hilgenkamp Accountability: Jaworski/Hilgenkamp Adverse Trend: None 7

O 1992 Monthly Ernorgency AC Power Unavailability Value

-M-1992 Emergency AC Power Unavai ability Value Year-to-Date

--O--

1991 &1992 Fort Calhoun Goals (0.024)

IGOODI Y

+ 1991 Emergency AC Power Unava!!abihty Value Year to-Date 0 06 -

-A-1995 INPO Industry Goal (0.025) 0.05-

-C}-

Industry Upper 10% (.0065) 0.04 -

0.03 -

~

n

~

g_ -...g..

g _..g.... g... 4._..... p _ g.

g.

g.. _ g.

~

0.01 -

C C

C O-C C

-C C

K

-M 0

x M

yg 7"7 Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE i

This indicator shows the Emergency AC Power System unavailability value, as defined by INPO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the reporting month.

The Emergency AC Power System unavailability value for August 1992 is 0.0019. The Emergency AC Power System unavailability value year-to-date is 0.0017.

There were 2.9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months of planned unavailability for DG-1 in August to inspect relays for contact degradation.

in July there were no (zero) hoters of planned or unplanned unavailability.

In June 1992 there were 9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months of planned unavailability for DG-2 for retorqueing radiator fan retaining bolts, in May 1992 there were 7.9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months of planned unavailability for DG-1 to tighten the fan -

blades and repair a starting air solenoid valve.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 0.024. The 1995 INPO industry goalis 0.025 and the industry upper ten percentile value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91) is approximately 0.0065.

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning Accountability: Jaworski/Ronning Adverse Trend: None 8

- O Monthly Gross Heat Rate-

-A-Year to-Date Gross Heat Rate f12-am 8

9 11-

.10520 10304

.10023 Cyc;e 14

$$f{

Refueling 11-4=-+-4 j

10-Outage -

}

q

[g.

4 g

l y-l

]

a i

i i

i 4

4 i

i i

i

'89

'90

'91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 GROSS HEAT RATE This indicator shows the Gross Heat Rate (GHR) for the reporting month, the year-to-date value, and the year-end GHR for the previous 3 years.

. The gross heat rate for the_ Fort Calhoun Station was reported as 10,335 BTU /KWH during the month of August 1992.

The year to-date gross heat rate was reported as 10,259 BTU /KWH.

Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

- Accountability: Patterson

' Adverse Trends: None 9

l O

1992 Monthly Therma! Pe formance

-M-1992 Year to Date Avera;e Thermal Performance A

-O-1992 Foq Ca! noun Goat 99.3%)

1 l GOOD l

-b-1995 INPO hd.;stry Goa! (99 5%) incastry Upper 10% (e9 8%)

100 % -

g,._.__ g.....g _..... g..... g..,

.p

_.. g..

_. g.._..g.._... g L

T 1

L L

L s

u u

C C

D" O

O D: ~ O-C O

O 99%-

-Se Cycie 14 Refuelm.g 98%-

OAage 97%-

96%

i 4

Jan92 Feo Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep O:t Nov Dec92 THERMAL PERFORt.1ANCE This indicator shows the 'lt ermal Performance value for the reporting month, the year-to-date average thermal performance value, the 1992 Fort Calhoun goal, the 1995 INPO industry goal and the industry median value.

The thermal performance value for the reporting month was 99.7% The year-to-date average thermal per ormance value was 99.6%

The 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal for this indicator is 99.3% The 1995 INPO industry goalis 99.5% and the industry upper ten percentile value (for the one year period from 1/90 through 12/91) is approximately 99.8%

Data Source: Jaworski/Popei Accountability: Jaworski/Popek Adverse Trend: None 10

O Monthly EAF Daw Amage EAF 100Sb-l GOOD l 85.6

}

77 80% -

1 56 6 fiO% -

Cycle 14 Refue!ing Outage 4 0% --

r

/

20% -

i i

i 1 0%

i i

'89

'90

'91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec02 EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF), the year-to-date EAF for 1992, and the EAF for the previous 3 years.

The EAF for August 1992 was reported as 64.29%. This figure is a result of the follow-

~

ing two forced outages that occurred during August: 1) on 8/5/92 a feeder breaker to the 125V de panel Al-41 A failed. The turbine generator was synchronized to the grid on 8/6/92; 2) on 8/22/92 an AC/DC converter failed in the Turbine Electro Hydraulic Con-trol system. Pressurizer safety valve RC-142 then opened prior to reaching design pressure during a plant transient and trip. The plant was shutdown for the remainder of the mont'.

The EAF for July 1992 was reported as 34.39%. This figure is a result of the forced outage caused by the loss of an inverter and the subsequent reactor trip on 7/3/92. The plant was brought to 90% power or. 7/26/92.

The year-to-date average EAF was reported as 43.63%

Data Source: Dietz/Parra (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 11 l

i

O 1902 Monthly Unit Capability Facto,

--et-1992 Year.to Da'e Average Unit Capabi4ty Factor 1991 Year to-Date Averaga Unit Capabile.y Factor

@ 1991 &1002 Fort Calhoun cop.:.

, p dy g s*r--

1995 INPO industry Con! (80%)

O.

indus,try Upper 10% (84.1% for n Three Yoa* Avt..nos) b b

h b

b O

C io14 50% -

Refueling i

M 10%-

Aug92' Sep91 Oct Nov Dec

.J a n Foo Mar Apr ' May Jun J ul UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Unit Capability (UCF) Factor and the 1995 INPO industry goal. UCF is defined as the ratio of the avai!able energy generation over a given period of time to the reference energy generation (the energy that could be pro-duced if the unit were coerated contiouously at full power under reference ambient conditions) over the same time period, exr,ressed as a percentage.

The UCF was reported es 62% for the month of August 1992. Unplanned energy losses for the month were a result of the following two forced outages: 1) on 8/5/92 a feeder breaker to the 125V de panel Al-41 A failed. The turbine generator was synchro-nized to the grid on 8/6/92; 2) on 8/22/92 an AC/DC converter failed in the Turbine Electro Hydraulic Control system. Pressurizer safety valve RC 142 then opened prior to reaching design pressure during a plant transient and trip. The plant was shutdown for the remainder of the month.

The UCF was reported as 34% for the month of July 1992. Energy losses for the month were due to the forced outage caused by the loss of an inverter and the subsequent reactor trip on 7/3/92. The plant was brought to 90% power on 7/26/92.

The year to-date average unit capability factor was reported as 44.7%.

The 1995 INPO industry goal is 80% and the industry upper ten percentile value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91) is approximately 84.1%.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for Unit Capability Factor is 69.2%. The basis for this goal is 86 days for the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage,20 days rampup (10 full power equivalent days), unplanned loss of 11.5 full power equivalent days, and 10 day rampup (5 full power equivalent aays).

Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 12

100% -

O 1992 Moninly unnianned capan iar toss ractor 90'N -

-St~

1992 Year-to Dato Averago Unplanned Capabahty Loss Factor 1991 Year to Date Avorago Unplanned Capabihty Loss Factor p

m.--

-O-1991 a 1992 Fort Calhoun Gon!s

- - ~

- - 1995 INPO Industry Goal (4 5%)

-C}--

Incustry Upper 10% (1.07% for a T hree Year Averago) 30% -

Cycie 14 Rofvehng 2 0* ~

Outago M

y 10%-

/*~~~~~

"'-" " " - c-0%

' "-[

7

~~

b-- 3 Sop 91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Unplanned Capability Loss Factor (UCLF), the Fort Calhoun UCLF goal for 1992, and the 1995 INPO industry goal. UCLF is defined as the ratio of the unplanned energy losses during a given period of time, to the refer-ence energy generation (the energy tha' c ould be produced if the unit were operated continuously at full power under reference ambient conditions), expressed as a percent-l age.

l The UCLF was reported as 38% for the month of August 1992. Unplanned energy losses for the month were a resuh of the following two forced outages: 1) on 8/5/92 a feeder breaker to the 125V dc panel Al-41 A failed. The turbine generator was synchro-t nized to the grid on 8/6/92; 2) on 8/22/92 an AC/DC converter failed in the Turbine Electro Hydraulic Control system. Pressurizer safety valve RC-142 then opened prior to reaching design pressure during a plant transient and trip. The plant was shutdown for the remainder of the month.

The UCLF was reported as 66% for the month of July 1992. Unplanned energy losses for the month were due to the forced outage caused by the loss of an inverter and the subsequent reactor trip on 7/3/92 and operating at less than full power from 7/23 through 7/31 after bringing the unit back on-line.

l The year-to date average UCLF is 18.2%.

The 1995 INPO industry goalis 4.5% and the industry upper ten percentile value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91)is approximately 1.87%

The Fort Calhoun goal for Unplanned Capability Loss Factor is 4.5% The basis for this goalis an unplanned loss of 11.5 full power equivalent days and 10 day rampup (5 full power equivalent days).

Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 13 l

Q' 1992 iAonthly Planned Capabihty Loss Factor 1992 Year-to-Date Average PCLF lGOODI

--i.- 1991 Year to-Date Averagt PCLF

- C)--

1991 & 1992 For*. Cclhoun Goals

- C)- Industry PAedian Value (18 3*4 for a Three Year Averagw)

Cyde 14 Refuetng outage 100 % -

80% -

/

~

y 5,

5 5

8 Ws-a=

g-s n

n Sep91 Oct N ov Doc Jrn Feb Mar Apr PAay Jun J ul Aug92 PLANNED CAPAA".lTY LOSS FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Planned Capability Loss Factor (PCLF), the PCLF year to-date monthly _ average, and the Fort Calhoun yearly average goals for 1991 and 1992. PCLF is defined as the ratio of the planned energy losses during a given period of time, tc the reference energy generation (the energy that could be pro-duced if the unit were operated continuously at full power under reference ambient conditions), expresed as a percentage.

The PCLF was reported as 0% for the month of August 1992. Energy losses for the month were dua to the following tvvo forced outages: 1) c. 8/5/92 a feeder breakei to the 125V de panel Al-41 A failed. The turbine generator was synchronized to the grid on 8/6/92; 2) on 8/22/92 an nC/DC converter failed in the Turbine Electre Hydraulic Con-trol system. Pressurizer safety valve RC 142 then opened prior to reaching design pressure during a plant transient and trip. The plant was shutdown for the remainder of the month. These energy lossec were classified as unplanned.

The PCLF was reported as 0% for the month of July 1992. Energy losses for July were due to the forced outage caused by the loss of an inverter and the subsequent reactor trip on 7/3/92. These energy losses were classified as unplanned.

The year-to date-average monthly PCLF for 1992 is 37.1%.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun yearly average Planned Capability Loss Factor goalis 26.3%.

The basis for this goalis 86 days for the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage and 20 days rampup (10 full power equivalent days). The 1991 goal was 7%.

The PCLF industry median value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91)is 18.3 %

Data Source: Generation Tota!s Re,., ort & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 14

O Fuel Rehab@ty Ind cator 5-

-b-1995 INPO industry Goal (0.s X 10 3 facrocuries/ Gram)

(GOOD]

--O-1992 Fort Ca'houn Goa!

~4 4-h h, 3 -

c.

i 2 2_

Cycle 14 g

Refueling FRl Not Outage AvaDable for Ju!y 1-

'92 O

O.

-O O

1:L a

n

-o a

A A

o-a A

Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Fen Mar Apr May Jun Jul AugD2 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) was reported as 6.'75 X 10 4 microcuries/ gram for the month of August 1992. This compares to 7.51 X 10-4 microcuries/ gram for the month of June. The FRt was not reported for the month of July due to limited data available for trending Only a few days at the beginning and a few days at the very end of July met the INPO criteria for steady state operation.

The August FRI was calculated using the data from August 1 through 4 anc' 14 through

21. In accordance with the INPO definition of steady state operation, the plant was at power levels above 85% during this time and the power levels did not vary more than +

or - 5% for at least 3 days. Only the iodine concentration values from the days that meet this steady state criteria can be factored into the INPO Fuel Reliability Indicator.

The last detected fuel failure was during Cycle 13. The FRI values observed during the later months of Cycle 13 were in the 2.5 X 10-3 to 3.9 X 10-3 microcuries/ gram range.

A Fort Calhoun goal of 7.5 X 10 4 microcuries/ gram will be utilized in 1992. Fort Cal-houn recognizes the INPO 1995 U.S. industry goal of 5.0 X 10-4 microcuries/ gram and will revise the annual FR1 goal accordingly.

The FRI was not applicable while the plant was shutdown for the refueling outage in February, March and April, and was not reponed during those months.

Data Source: Holthaus/Guliani Accountability: Patterson!Spilker Adverse Trend: None 15

O uontniy Personnei Radiation exposure Personnel Cumulative Rad ation Exp0sure (Person Rem)

-O-Fort Cal noun AnnualGoal(250 Person-Rem) 1995 INPO Industry Goat (185 Person Rem)

-O--

Industry Upper 10% (118.5 Person-Rem for a Three Year Average)

IGOODI 276

~

n

//,f's:)

D O-O O

O O-O O-C O

O-O O

'//

f,,

~

a a

m

/

D-O-.Q D-O- 0 -- O 0 -D-0-0 93 4

~

100-

=$f" h'

52 I

/

'89

'90

'91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE During August 1992,3.432 person rem was recorded by TLDs worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station. The year-to-date exposure is 239.902 person rem.

The Fort Calhoun goal for personnel radiation exposure (cumulative) during 1992 is 250 l

person rem. Cumulative radiation exposure for the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage was 216.899 person rem, which exceeds the outage goal of 210 person rem. The goal was not achieved because the outage was longer than anticipated and there was more exposure than expected due to the stuck reactor vessel stud and the thermal shield inspection.

The 1995 INPO industry goalis 185 person-rem per year. The industry upper ten percentile value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91) is approximately 118.5,serson-rem per year. The three year average for Fort Calhoun Station from 1/89

... rough 12/91 is 140.4 person-rem per year.

Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None SEP54 16

Cumulative Dry Active Waste Sent For Processing (in cubic feet) 25000-20000 -

15000-10000-5000 -

0 Jan9? Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 i

O Radioactive Waste Baried This Month (in cubic feet)

Cumulative *tadioact:ve Waste Buried

-O-Fort Cathe an Goa! For Waste Buried (3,000 cubic feet)

-e-1995 F 0 Industry Goal (3.884 cubic feet)

- D-Indn.y Upper 10% (2.118.5 cubic feet) 4500q a 4310 a

a a

a

-o a

a a

a

,)

3000 -

O O

-O O

O O

O

-O 3334

_ 1500-

~'

N'$

0

_.,#m i

i i

'90

'91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 Year-end Total l

VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The upper graph shows the volume of radioactive oil and dry radioactive waste sent for processing. The lower graph shows the volume of the monthly radioactive waste bur-ied, the cumulative annual total for radioactive waste buried, and the year-end totals for radioactive waste buried the previous 2 years.

Cumulative amount of solid radwaste shipped off site for processing (cubic feet) 19,520 l

Amount of solid radwaste shipped off-site for processing during August (cubic feet) 0.0 Volume of solid radioactive waste which was buried during August (cubic feet) 29.1 Cumulative volume of solid radioactive waste buried in 1992 (cubic feet) 868.1 Amount of solid radioactive waste in temporary storage (cubic leet) 240 6 The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for the volume of solid radioactive waste which has been buried is 3,000 cubic feet. The 1995 INPO industry goalis 110 cubic meters (3,884 cubic feet) per year. The industry upper ten percentile value is approximately 60 cubic

_i meters (2,118.5 cubic feet) per year.

Data Source: Patterson/Breuer (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bilau Adverse Trend: None SEP54 17

W 1992 Disabling injury /lilness Frequency Rate 1991 Disabling injury /lliness Frequency Rate

-- O - Fort Calhoun Goa! (0.3) 6- -

1995 INPO Ind 1stry Goat (0.5) j_

1.2 -

1-y 0.8 -

06-a o

a i

a/

nM A

A 0.4 -

'N M_

O-O C

O O

O v

0.2 -

0 ---- n Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep O ct Nov Dec92 -

DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

This indicator shows the 1992 disabling injury / illness frequency rate. The 1901 dis-abling injury / illness frequency rate is also shown.

The disabling injury / illness frequency rate for January through August 1992 was 1.26.

There was one disabling injury, a strained back, reported for the month of August. The total number of lost time accidents that have been reported during 1992 is 5. The 1992 disabling injury / illness frequency rate goal was set at 0.30. The 1995 INPO Industry goal is 0.50.

The disabling injury / illness frequency rate for the past twelve months is 1.03.

4 of the 5 disabling injuries for 1992 were back injuries. The Industrial Safety Coordina-tor has developed an action plan to address this adverse trend.

The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury / illness frer ancy rate is approxi-mately 0. i 6.

Year Year-End Rate 1989 0.4 1990 0.5 1991 0.4 Data Sot ce: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Accountt :lity: Patterson/ Richard Adverse Trend: The manager of the Safety Department has stated that, based on this indicator's 1992 values being above the 5 year average values, an adverse trend is indicated.

SEP 25 & 26 18 l

4 Q

Thermal Output -

-O-Fort Calnoun 1495 MW Goal Tech Spec 1500 MW Um:t 1500-

.-.s

.. aise t....

c..

. t.% '.* d a g h t4iM''u %'.',

1490-10i'J242d T ' i' '

.M%%%'s1.%i;}-ad;Wl;%?;%&'.

.i.%t.'i% ba.?-

Q *t'rn?t%*;' '* *? %'?:%:i'..

.a air bhiddN;L r

+

4lihN..t.te:%'at;t..jd4'.'.

nw;g 3' %'-

p,

~t;t.'.'.

$n 480-.TfM inif d S'd S M di' N

gl

.'AIN}IM@IN$Nt,I'[@,* Nd' o

. e e:n. -

.,,tn'e w'viwveem e.ve 2

".% %'

P.

?;? A ~ t*;})* jim'Jp4

*.' TON.*

7,

' J. P.

U P b % ',1

1. ;* M P* N,,,. t (t #L. t. % '. ' D. '. *.

g1470-

';'Mrin'

, ; : gngi,TW@h%'s';-i;'abute';N' 4

gI'gr'x;;'

g; wet

t r ( g ;*.t Vt.!.te'!'t';;r.pp.n S'

-,4t;'

% * ? i'. *. ' N.4 g'.dM Q 17% ' 41. !i'414'. '. *.

ti e n t.',',*.

7"

'SI!;&*?

MN

';*;'9*.*;'

.<.4 s' g* i % M-. jh. ~.p r} y:.. v.

". y,3. t. t.%,

' W it';%

i;QW'

!J.' W ti';*.~

1460-

.'..y t....,

...... %^t V* r ?i* i%'? P P ; VV s':. ',

%%.%'c',;Ly* tl*tistr'yj"t;%%t'.t;t.i;*,

' %tgt.-

,tg*p4 pppp s

'.1st? - ' r nits 4s!.D.*S'P?.*.'.

'r,'.t.

' % ?. '. !. *

ar,,'i'v,.*;q'rg

,.. 9 m.. w. m.. / ;t.*.*.

c%1..*..'.4i.n.-. %%..v.e.s.g;e.rer, ; *;, a '.

.'.L. p. t r T

r t

3. c..L. *

.s r

cSc..*:n. is*. v...

eg.,.

1 3

5 7

9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The above thermal output graph displays the daily operating power level during August 1992, the 1500 thermal megawatt average technical specification limit; and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal.

The daily thermal output chart for August reflects the following forced outages: 1) on S/

S/92 a feeder breaker to the 125V de panel Al 41 A falied. The turbine generator was

. synchronized to the grid on 8/6/92: 2) or 8/22/92 an AC/DC converter failed in the Turbine Electro Hydraulic Control system. Pressurizer safety valve RC-142 then-opened prior to reaching design pressure and the plant tripped. The plant was shut-down forthe remainder of the month.

Fort Calhoun Station is currently -oerating at a level of feak. Linear Heat Rate such.

that, if incore detector alarm monnoring is not maintained, power must be reduced below 80% within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months .

- Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

Accountability: - Patterson/Trausch Adverse Trend: None 19

-.-m_..

.m--_

t Equipment Forced Outage Raio j

-O-1990 Fort Calhoun Goal i

1.5 -

1-l 0.53 o.$

y 0.5 -

j' f C

O C-O --C C

O O

C C

y 0 13 l

w w:

9

'89

'90

'91 JanG2 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 02 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1,000 CRITIC AL HOURS The equipment forced cutage rate per 1,000 critical hours was 1.69 for the months from January through August 1992.

The following two equipment forced outages occurred in August: 1) on 8/5/92 a feeder breaker to the 125V de panel Al 41 A failed. The turbine generator was synchronized to -

the grid on 8/6/92; 2) on C'!2/92 an AC/DC convener failed in the Turbine Electro Hydraulic Control system. Pressurizer safety valve RC 142 then opened prior to reach-ing design pressure during a plant transient and trip. The plant was shutdown for the remainder of the month.

There was one equipment forcec' outage during July due to the loss of an inverter and the subsequent reactor trip on 7/3/92.

There was one equipment forchi outage during June due to a dropped control rod. The rod was dropped at 2305 on 5/31/92 and reactor shutdown commenced at that time, i

The generator was taken off line at 0234 on 6/1/92 and was brought back on line at 0852 on 6/2/92.

There was one equipment forced outage during May. This equipment forced outage occurred on May 14 when the turbine generator tripped on a false high level moisture separator trip signal which caused a simultaneous reactur trip.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 0.2.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Patterson/ Jaworski Adverse Trend: An adverse trend is indicated based on four consecutive months of declining performance.

Operations 1992 Budget (i IA inon) 80-

-H-199? Comutat ve Total (ilA n.on) 60 --

0~

at "

-n

po..

O Jan9?

I et) lAar Apr lAay Jsn Jal Aug C e;>

Oct

!Jov Dec9?

lAarntenance 199? Dadget (i fAnon) 40-30-

-W-199P Cumulative T ota' (5 IAAon)

PO+

10-A

"~

~

g o~

Jan9?

T er; lAar Am lAay Jun Jul Aug Sep Oc; rJav Dec0?

OPERATIOlJS AlJD Mall 4TE!JAIJCE BUDGET lho Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year to date as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhnun Station.

The budget year-to date for Operations was 47,101,800 dollars for August 1992 while the actuni cumulative expenditures through August totated /,2,983,8G7 dollars. The 1992 year-end bud 0et for operations has been revised to 62,473,800 dollars, which is a reduction of 4,187,000 uallars.

The t'udget year-to dato for Maintenance was 15,322,300 dollars for August 1992 while the actual cumulative expenditures through August totaled 13,999,994 dollars. The 1992 year end budget for maintenance has been revised to 18,342,000 dollars, which is an increase of 188,000 dollars.

Data Source: Gleason/ Parent (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Scofield Adverse Trend: None

?)

O Documents seneduled for neview 700-9 Documents Reviewed l

O - Overdue Documents

/

500-j 1

g, 400-s

~

i.

300-200-i' t-

),

100-

._ j p;

l l

?

.i m

m y

?

e

'(

p

~

I 7---

0 i

i i

i Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 DOCUMENT REVIEW This indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month These document reviews are performed in house and include Special Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual.

During August 1992 there were 383 document reviews completed while 604 document reviews were scheduled. At the end of August, there wwe no document reviews over-due.

During the month of August there were 48 new or renamed dor iments reviewed.

These new or renamed documents will need to be reviewed ag.

in 1994.

Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Jaworski Positive Trend SEP 46 z!

Q f Jumber of Failuren'20 Demands.

-G-Trigger Values for 20 Demands rJumber of Fadures'so Demands a - Trigger Values for so Demands O

rJumber of ranuten 1oo Demanet.

Trigger valuec for too Demanos 0-l o0001

+

c-s y

_.v.

p 3

. _c _. a.

_r-4 4

4 4

4 4-g g

g g

- _c g;.-

c._._ g

_ _g g

g-_ _c 22 22 22 22 2

2 2

~

2-

~;

1 1

1 o

o o

o o-i i

Sep91 Oct tJov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY This bar graph shows three monthly ind:cators pertaining to the number of failures that were reported during the last 20,50, and 100 eniergency diesel generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also shown are trigger values which correspond to a high level of confidence that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a reliability of greater than 0: equal to 95% when the failure values are below the corresponding trigger val-ues. The Fort Calhoun 1992 goalis to have fewer f ailures than these trigger values.

The demands counted for this in'; etor include the respective number of starts and the respective number of load-runs to' J.m Diesel Generators combined. The number of start demands includes all valid and inadvertent starts, including all start only demands and all start demands that are followed by load-run demands, whether by automatic or manualinitiation. Load run demands must follow successful starts and meet at least one of the following criteria: a load-run that is a result of a real load signal, a load-run test expected to carry the plant's load and duration as stated in the test specifications, and a special test in which a diesel generator was expected to be operated ior a mini-mum of one hour and to be loaded with at least 50% of design load (see exceptions and other demand criteria in the Definition Section of this report).

The demand failure which occurred during the month of August 1991 for DG 2 was due to a seal failure on the jacket water pump.

Data Source: Je w rski/Ronning (Manager /Gource)

Accountability:

worski/Ronning Adverse Trend; None 23

O DG 1 Failures /25 Demands lGOODI O

Da 2 Failurest:5 Demanes 4

5-9, Failure Trigger Value for 25 Demands / Fort Calhoun Goal 4-C O

O O

C 0

C C

O

^

~'

^

3-2 2

2 2

2 1

1 1

O 0

0 0

0 i

l i

i l

i i

l Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS)

This indicator shows the number of failures experienced by each emergency diesel generator during the last 25 start demands and the last 25 load run demands. A trigger value of 4 failures within the last 25 demands is also shown. This frigger value of 4 failures within 25 demands is the Fort Calhoun goal for 1991.

It must be emphasized that in accordance with NUMARC criteria, certain actions will take place in the event that any one emergency diesel generator experiences 4 or more failures within tha last 25 demands on the unit. These actions are described in tne Definitions Section of this report. A Standing Order has been drafted for the Fort Cal-houn Station to institutionalize and formally approve / adopt the required NUMARC ac-tionJ.

Diesel Generator DG-1 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 demands on the unit.

i Diesel Generator DG 2 has experienced one failure during the last 25 demands on the unit. An air damper roll pin f ailure occurred in July 1991, Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Ronning Adverse Trend: None l

24-l l

l..

O Planned Hours of DieselGenerator No 2 Unavailabihty

@ Unplanned Hours of Diesel Generator No 2 Unavaitabikty O Estimated Hours of Diesel Generator No 2 Unavailabihty y50-E Planned Hours of DieselGenerator No 1 Unavailabihty i

A}

Unplanned Hours of Diesel Generator No.1 Unavailabikty Eo o

0 0,

i 3

i i

i Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb lAar Apr lAay Jun Jul Aug92 20-

--+- Cumulative Hours of DG 1 Unavailabihty for 199c

[

Cumulative Hours of DG 2 Unavailabihty for 1992 1

Y Q

?U

/

Z f

Ye x

D i

o v

v

}

S-0-

?>

?

i i

y i

3 i

i Jan92 Feb tAar Apr FAay Jun Jul Aug92 DIESEL GEf1ERATOR Uf1 AVAILABILITY This indicator provides a monthly illustration of diesel generator unavailability. The top graph shows the diesel generator planned, unplanned, and estimated unavailable hours for DG 1 and DG 2 for each month. The lower graph shows the cumulative hours of unavailability for each diesel generator for the year to date.

During August there were 2.9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months of planned unavailability for DG 1 to inspect relays for contact degradation.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis a maximum of 210.82 hours9.490741e-4 days 0.0228 hours 1.35582e-4 weeks 3.1201e-5 months of unavailability for each diesel generator.

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (fAanager/ Source)

Accountab!!ity: Jaworski/Ronning Adverse Trend: None 25

400-Q lAay 1992 Outt.tand<ng tAWOs O Juno 1992 Outstand no tAWOs O July 1992 Outstanding tAWOs 300-O Augus.1992 Outstano,ng eawOs E

200-

f'(

M6.

'z:

%$:b

~

g kf[

100-ue hk II$

~

m::

gz E'E D

A'F

$?

5

M 7

5N N??

A' $;

$b:

??

n I

i i

i 1

0 3 tAonths 3 6 tAcnths 0 9 PAonths 912 PAonths

>12 lAonths AGE OF OUTSTAtJDitJG fAAll4TEl4At1CE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE l10tl OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the age of corrective non outage maintenance work /.rders (tdWOs) remaining open at the end of the reporting month.

The increase in non outage corrective maintenance is reflected by the increase in resources dedicated to completing the recent forced outages.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (IAanager/ Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: None 2G

D May1992 432 Q June 1992 39d 400 -

383 376 O Ju!y 1992 350--

O August 1992 300-26s 250-ppp 210 195 200-150-f$

f, 101 110 M 110 100 -

79

,1, 61 04 49 50-33 pc p, p

h, l

l l

l 0

3 i

Total Open FAWOs Open fAWOs>3 Total Open Safety Open Safety Open High Priority months old Rotated IAWOs Related fAWOs > 3 fAWOs fAonths Oid FAAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWi1(CORRECTIVE f1ON. OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of corrective non outage lAWOs remaining open at the end of the reporting month, along with a breakdown by several key categories.

The number of open lAWOs >3 months old increased during March and April because on line activities had to be scheduled beyond the end of the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

The 1992 goal for this indicator is to have less than 350 total corrective non outage maintenance work orders remaining open.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 27

Corrective I/aintenance Backlog > 3 fAonths Old IGOOD]

80% -

y Cy::e 14 Refue!<ng 00% -

Outage 40%-

~

20%-

0%-

Sep91 Oct fJov Dec Jan Feb

'fAar Apr fAay Jun Jul Aug92

' Prog ammate change to rde:t change in non outage entena.

CORRECTIVE MAltJTEtJAtJCE D ACKLOG GREATER THAtJ 3 MOtJTHS OLD (flOtJ OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the percentage of open corrective non outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of the report %g month.

The percentage of open corrective non outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of August 1992 was repor1ed as 70,2%

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: An adverse trend is indicated based on three consecutive months of increasing values for this indicator. The increase in non outage cor. '".m maintenance is reflected by the increase in resources dedicated to completing the recent iorced outages.

SEP 3G 28

t O

Ratio of Preventive t' 1otalida'ntenanec s

-O--

1991 & 1992 Fort Ca'houn IJon Outage Goa's Cycie 14 l GOOD l Rekeq 90% -

Outye 80%-

70% -

O O

^

n 60% -

C, O-O

[

~

50% -

l 40%-

30% -

t 20%

l Sep91 Oct fJov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr iday Jun Jul Aug92 i

R ATIO OF PREVEtJTIVE TO TOTAL Mall 1TEt4AtJCE This indicator shows the ratio of completed non outage preventive maintenance to total completed non outage maintenance.

l The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 55.1% in August 1992.

The increase in non outage corrective maintenance is reflected by the increase in resources dedicated to completing the recent forced outages.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to attain a ratio of preventive to total maintenance non-i outage greater than 65%. The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal was to attain a ratio of preven-tive to total maintenance greater than 60%.

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: Nnne SEP 41 29 L

4%-

O Preventive Maintenance items Ovedue l GOOD l

-O-1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goats k

3%-

2%-

Cycle 14 Refueling Outage 1%-

O----C 6

b o

O o

o I l o%

Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun

. Jul Aug92 PREVEt4TIVE Malt 4TEtJAt1CE ITEMS OVERDUE The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in the administration and execution of preventive maintenance (PM) programs. A small percentage of preventive mainte-nance items overdue indicates a station commitment to the preventive maintenance program and an ability to plan, schedule, and periorm preventive maintenance tasks as programs require.

During August 1992,517 PM items were completed.1 PM item (0.19% of the total) was not completed within the allowable grace period.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 0.5% per month of the preventive maintenance items overdue. The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal was to have less than 1% per month of the preventive maintenance items overdue.

Data Source: Patterson/Brady (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: None

- SEP 41 30

[

O Control Room Instruments Repairable On Line j

1 i

Total Number of Control Room Instruments Out cf Service i

50 -

-O-1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals F or Total Out of-Service Instruments 40-30-h,h 20-wz w

'@f

O%

A Oe

?1 O

O O

844 ste Of O

O U-0 w'%'-

"'m'

?n" i

=

10-

~ ;

u,.

u

e-m 9:r I;

h N

9a$i IY$l N

E 2i?

I ye 29 n

wz 9;u w

ccu 6x 07<

l 0

A'$

l l

1 i

i i

i Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr t.iay -

Jun Jul AugD2 NUMBER OF OUT-OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS This indicator shows the number of out of service control room instruments, the number of instruments repairable during plant operations (on line), and the 1991 and 1992 Fort Calhoun goals.

l There was a total of 11 out of service control room instruments at the end of August l

1992. 4 of these ins,truments require a plant of age to repair. 2 instruments were l

added and none (0) were completed during the month.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 13 out of service control room instru-ments. The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal was to have less than 14 out-of service control room instruments.

Data Scurce: Patterson/Spilker (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: None

(-

1 31 l

[]

lAaintenance Overtime 80% -<

lGOOD)

-- M - 12 lAonth Avtrage IAaintenance Overtime 1

70% -

- O - 1991 & 1992 Fon Calhoun "On Une Goa!s 60%-

Cyc'e 14 Refuehng 50%-

Omage 40% -

30%-

C O

O O

20% -

k y,.

y-_

v n

10%-

R

_Q_

O--.- O O

_g, f

0%

Sep92 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb idar Apr fAay Jun Jul Aug92 M AltJTEtJ Af4CE OVERTIME The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ab:hty to periorm the desired mainte-nance activities with the allotted resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue.

The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 22.7%

during the month of August 1992. The 12 month avenge percentage of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 18.9%. Both July and August overtime were high due to two long term (>2 weeks) forced outages.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for the "on line" percentage of maintenance overtime hours worked is a maximum of 10%

Data Source: Pattctrson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: None 32 1

3 O Open irs Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance)

O ciosed ins neiatee to tne use et e,0ceovees tua ntenance>

D erocedura' Noncor hance,Rs (Ma ntenance) l Cycte 14 Refuehng 10-age 6

5-4 3

3

]>

2 2

1 1

11 1

1 1

1 0

0 O

0 0 0 0

0 O O O

O 00 0

i i

Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug9?

PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLlANCE IfJCIDENTS (Malt 4TENANCE)

This indicator shows the number of open Maintenance incident Reports (irs) that are related to the use of procedures, the number of closed irs that are related to the use of procedures, and the number of open and closed irs that received procedural noncom-pliance cause codes for each of the last twelve months.

There were no (zero) procedural noncompliance incidents for maintenance reported for the month of August 1992.

Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 15,41 & 44 33 r

7 e

m y

q-,y9

,.%+a---ey,,

eg

,,m-y

,%--+,,vy=-r-qrg w--

e y-

-w

-,-m--ewy y

g-W 9-

--y----

m---

O completed Scheduled Activities (EM)

--G--

Fort Calhoun Goal t

100 % -

90%-

~

80% -

C Q

U O

s

^

fg a

o 70% ~

V' O

,y 60% -

Q 50% --

40% -

30%-

20% -

10%-

u 0%

5/30- 6/G C/13 6/20 G/27 7/4 7/11 7/18 7/2s 8/1 8/8 8/15 8/22 8/29 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENAllCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Electrical i

Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

Data for this indicator was not available for the month of July 1992 due to the forced outage from 7/3 through 7/23.

Data for this indicator was not tracked during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reoortina Month Comoteted Scheduled Activiti s f

Week 1 88%

Week 2 85%

Week 3 92 %

Week 4 90 %

(

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 34

.-m O

Completed Schedulod Actn/itios (PE)

-O-Fod Calhoun Goal 100% -

90%-

00% -

"CT-U-o-U-0 O

O O -O 70%-

GO% ~

1,

60%-

40%-

30%-

20% -

10%-

0%-

5/30 G/G G/13 G/20 G/27 7/4 7/11 7/18 7/25 0/1 8 'O D/15 8/22 8'29 PERCEtJT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAliJTEtJANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE EQUIPMEi1T)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Pressure Equipment Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibratiors, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

Performance was below the goal for the week ending 8/29 due to the extensive PE resources required for emergent activities during the forced outage that began on 8/22.

Data for this indicator was not available for the month of July 1992 due to the forced outage from 7!3 through 7/23.

Data for this indicator was not tracked during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

The Fort Calhoun Station g0 31 for this indicator is 80%,

Reoorting Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 87 %

Week 2 84 %

Week 3 87 %

Week 4 76 %

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trond: None SEP 33 35

O Oompleted Schecuted Activities (GM)

-CF.

Fort Cathosh Coat 100 % -

90%-

00%-

O O

O O ---O 70% -

~

60% -

~

40%-

30% -

20%-

10% -

0%

$/30 G/0 G/13 0/20 GT7 7/4 7/11 7/18 7/25 0/1 0 's B/15 ST2 0.'20 PERCEtJT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAltJTEtJAtJCE ACTIVITIES (GEtJERAL MAllJTEtJAtJCE)

This iridicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning General Main-tenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

Performance was below the goal during the month of August 1992 because work scope changes were higher than anticipated and weather holds were necessary for many outside work activities.

Data for this indicator was not available for the month of July 1992 due to the forced outage from 7/3 through 7/23.

Data for this indicator was not tracked during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reoorting Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 44 %

Week 2 53 %

Week 3 85%

\\Veek 4 65%

l Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 36

A m.2

._,-s._,

u a1---

4 A__aiA+ab.Aa.2_

-.m_a-h-,.

-A

=.W-..2--p z

g m

_4 m

O Completed Scheduled Activities (Mf/)

-O--

Fort Calhoun Goal 100% -

~

90%-

~

80% - C D

9_

O O

O' O

O

^

70%-

00%-

50% --

40%-

p 30% ~

H 20% --

10% --

0%

0/6 0/13 G/20 C/27 7/4 7/11 7/10 7/25 8/1 8/B 8/15 8/22 8/29 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAltJTEtJAllCE ACTIVillES (MECHAtJICAL MAllJTEtJAtJCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the rumber of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Mechanical Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

Data for this indicator was not available for the month 1 July 1992 due to the forced outage from 7/3 through 7/23.

Data for this indicator was not tracked during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Moortina Month Comoleted Schedulegi Activities Week 1 88%

Week 2 93%

Week 3-92 %

Week 4 95 %

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 37 1

- - ~.

.-...--.,,,..r-y c

wmr...-,

%m..-

y

-.v

..~.,n

.----r-

.v,--n,

.,-,,.-.--e,.-

,.y-,

O compietee senees:ee esetuit,es <ic;

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal OM'...

90% -

80%-

0:

-o O -o-o o

o

_ o o

70 %. -

00%-

50%-

1 40%-

30%-

20%-

10%~

0%

s/30 C/G 0/13 6/20 C.'2 7 7/4 7/11 7/18 7/25 8/1 B/B B/15 8/22 8!29 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAltJTEtJANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Instrumenta-tion & Control. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

Data for this indicator was not available for the month of July 1992 due to the forced outage from 7/3 through 7/23.

Data for this indicator was not tracked during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%

Recor1ina Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 88 %

\\Veek 2 953'o Week 3 91 %

i Week 4 95%

l-Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) o tterson/Bobba Accountability:

a Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 ss

3-O f4 umber of lAissed STs Resulting in LERs 2-i 1-0 0

0 0

0 I

i i

i 4

i i

1 4

1

'90

'91 Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb lAar Apr fAay Jun Jul Aug92 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS This ind;cator shows the numbe! " missed Surveillance Tests (STs) that result in Lle-ensee Event Reports (LERs) during the reporting month. The graph t the left shows the yearly totals for the indicated years.

During the month of August 1992 there were no (zero) missed STs that resulted in

LERs, The 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun goals for this indicator are zero.

Data Source: Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Patterson/Jaworski Adverse Trond: None SEP 60 & 61 l

39-

O *'

.-O--

of Conronent Cmegones Tctal W of Categonch 3 s -'

. _,. - e of Apphcation Categones h

j._4 --- A - A ',, A -- A - -- A

[ 25-

,A 4

,y' hl gu K

/

A '+%+

\\-A

/

A 1s.

3 o _+

4 t

- 4 _ _ A...- A

__o

- 10 -

E-E~~E N"E-E~

y S ~-~.y w y y !

Ng 6.

m s --

0-i i

r i

i i

i tD1 A

PA J

J A

S 0

fJ D J9?

r fA A

IA J

J A97 O Woa, CMAg ng G Cmsed De m et.

O 'Aanuf a :tson, De'xt O 'Aa'ntenant "'1"tt'no LB O*.

~%

O t "o ""en"a'oe 'on O t,,o, Percent of Total failures During the fgM ',,*

Past 10 f,ionths N

till

/ C%

ew g

COMPONENT FAILURE ANALYSIS REPORT (CFAR) SUf.iMARY The top chart illustrates the number of component categories, application categories and total categories in which the Fort Calhoun Station has significantly higher (1.645 standard deviations) f ailure rates than the industry failure rates dunng the past 18 months (from March 1991 through August 1992). Fort Calhoun Station reported a higher failure rate in 12 of the 87 component categories (valva, pumps, motors, etc.)

dunng the past 18 months. The station reported a higher failure rate in 13 of the 140 application categories (main steam stop valves, auxiliary / emergency feedwater pumps, control element drive niotors, etc.) during the past 18 months.

The pie chart depicts the breakdown by INPO cause categones (see the " Definitions" section of this report 'ar descriptions of these categories) for the failure reports that were submitted to INPC by Fort Calhoun Station during the past 18 months.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Mancger/ Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/ Dowdy Adverse Trend: An adverse ' nd is indicated bred on four consecutive months of increasing values for apphcation and total failures This trend is due to failures found during the Cycle 14 Refuehng Outage. The figures have increased for;le last 4 reporting months because INPO requires approximately 3 months for auditing and processing of failure reports.

40

_. - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Greater inan one Faiiure 40-

- - + - Greater Than Two Failures

-e-Greater Than Five Failures R

N E

25-n-

l 20-N/

g 45-

'o-

+w

~

+w O'#

-O O

O O

D 0

4 i

i i

Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb t.iar Apr f.iay Jun Jul Aug92 NUMBER OF NPRDS MULTIPLE FAILURES This indicator shows the number of multiple NPRDS repodable failures over the preced-ing eighteen months sorted by component manufacturer and model number. The indica-tor is divided into three parts: manufacturer model numbers with more than one failure in eighteen months, manufacturer model numbers with more than two failures in eigh-teen months, and manufacturer model numbers with more than five failures in eighteen months.

During the past eighteen months, there were 29 model types that had more than one failure in eighteen months. 9 of these had more than two failures. 4 component types, General Electric 50 570 01 power supplies, Gaulin P18 pumps, Byron Jackson 28RXL pumps and Jayco incorporated 150 valves had more than five failures. The model types with more than two failures are: the OS"DS (3 failures), General Electric 50 570 power supplies (4 failures), General Electric 50-570 01 power suppl!?s (9 failures), Faulk Type Y couplings (3 failures), Byron Jackson 28 RXL pumps (7 failures), Gaulin P18 pumps (8 failures), Jayco incorporated 150 valves (6 failures), Norgren 11 024-0 valves (3 failures) and Copes Vulcan D-100-60 valves (3 failures).

Increases in the number of model numbers with more than one ft

.e is mostly due to failures found during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/ Dowdy Adverse Trend: None 41

Components Wah More Than One Failuto l GOOD l

-+--

Y

--h--

Components With More Than Two Failures 20--

1s-10-s-

J' M1 o-Sep91 Oct f4ov Dec Jan Feb

'lar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 l

MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS The Maintenance Effectiveness indicator was developed following guidelines set for1h by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Opera-tional Data (NRC/AEOD). The NRC/AEOD is currently developing and verifying a maintenance effectiveness indicator using the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) component failures.

This indicator has been revised to show the number of NPRD3 components with more l

than one failure during the last eighteen months and the number of NPRDS compo-l nents with more than two failures during the last eighteen months. The number of i

NPRDS components with more thar. two failures in an eighteen month period should indicate the effectiveness of plant maintenance.

During the last 18 reporting months there were 14 NPRDS components with more than l

1 failure. 2 of the 14 had more than two failures, The tag numbers of the cornponents with more than two failures are CH 1 A and CH 18.

l l

l Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba j

Adverse Trend: None l

l l

42

10 10-Catu!ated Check VaYe Fadute Rato per f. Mon Component Hours Indry Check Va!ve Fai!ure Rate per f,Ren Component Heurs 8-

-O-Fort Ca: noun Gea!

7 --

IGOODl F

y 9

5-w 4_

3~ b A -o-o-6%-6 O!

2-O O

O O

O O-O O

O O-O 1

1 3_

0 i

i i

i

'89 '90 '91 Sep91 0;t Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Ap* May Jun Jul Aug92 Ched, Valve Fanures CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE This indicator shows the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate, the Fort Calhoun goal and the industry check valve failure rate. This rate is based upon failures during the previous 18 months. The check valve failures at Fort Calhoun Station for the previous three years are shown on the left.

The data for the industry check valve failure rate is three months behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the data.

For May 1992, the Fort Calhoun Station reported an actual check valve failure rate of 6.18 E 7, while the industry reported an actual f ailure rate of 2.92 E-6. At the end of August 1992, the Fort Calhoun Station reported a calculated check valve f ailure rate of 6.16 E 7.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a me-imum f ailure rate of 2.00 E-6.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Jaworski/Rollins Adverse Trend: None SEP 43 l

43 l

}

O secondary system cpi

-O~

Fort Calhoun Goal ( 45) 1995 INPO Industry Goat (0.30) 1.5 -

--4--

secondary Systern CPI Limit

-O-Industry upper 10% (o 20) 1-I I

I l

l 4

l--

I l

Refuehng 0.5 - g _o_o._o_o oo:3ge g __3._ _3_3 au o.3 7--

i

+

iO-Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 5%-

O % of Hours Ohormtry is Outside 00 Guidehnes Cy0?14 3% --

Refuel;ng Outap 0% -)

,M M,

,M Sep91 Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 SECOf1DARY SYSTEf.i CHEF.ilSTRY The top graph, Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI),is calculated using the following three parameters: cation conductivity in steam generator blowdown, sodium in steam generator blowdown, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen. The bottom graph shows the percent of total hours of 13 parameters exceed-ing the Owners Group (OG) guidelines during power operation.

The CPI was reported as 0.561 for the month of August 1992. The percent of hours outside the OG guidelines was reported as 0.0% for the month of August 1992.

The 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun goals for the CPI are 0.45. The INPO 1995 Industry goalis 0.30. The industry upper ten percentile value for this indicator was approxi.

mately 0.20 for 1991.

Data Source: Frane.;o/Glantz (t/anager/ Source)

Accounicility: Patter!.on/Senmidt Adverse Trene None 44 p.

~m-.m

,,..m...,,.,,

,,.e.,

--,,.-.,.,..--n, a,

_.._ _ ___. _-_ _..___ _ __m-10%-

O Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 6%-

4%-

Cy:!e 14 2%-

C O

O O

O Refueling O-

-O O

U Outage 0%

Sep91 Oct fJov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out cf Limit indicator tracks the pri-mary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters. Typi-cally, lithium is the parameter that is out of limit.100% equates to all six parameters being out of limit for the month.

The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as 2.13% for the month of August 1992.

A plant outage in November and December 1990 resulted in a higher percentage of hours out of limit.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a maximum of 2% The 1991 goal was a maximum of 2%

Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Smith Adverse Trend: None 45

10% -

O

% of Hours Auxiliary System (CCW) Chemistry is Outside Station Umits

-1 in usW Upper Quade 8%-

6%-

L 4%-

Cycle 14 Refueling 2%-

Outage 0-0 D

C O

O

,0%-

'80 '90 Sep91 Oct Nov 0 00 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 AUXlLIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The Auxiliary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside the station chemistry limit.

The auxiliary system chemistry percent of hours outside station limits was reported as 0.0% for the month of August 1992. The last out of station limits condition occurred in.

June 1991 and was due to a low nitrite le/elin CCW coolant.

The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator was a maximum of 2%.

Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Smith Adverse Trond: None l

l l

l 46 L

t Number of instruments Out of-Service

--O-Fort Calhoun Goal 20 -'

24 21 24-23 22-20

'4!-

E E,

20-10 7

1' 2':

M

-18 17 c.

lRe

.fM:

A

'jf

$[

g 16-p 15 15 15

',y; 14-W w

w.--

w.

0%

'f7 2-W wz m

%+:

%/:.

?#:.

W.

fe:

z:.

12-zy 4g m:

e szt w.

e.

gx

y; 10-M W

'W

'W W

w

's

<w; s:

v%

%V w-8-

g g

cw 3

sx; w

Sz;

x?

M e-O.

.y q

q-g

& q?/p Q

Q3Q q

Q

^Q Q

4-MM Mf MI n

yE 2.s MM s:

M g.

%e Su u

m w;

W' 6%

xV m

m

/ ;<

9/:q e:-

w w

w xy

/

'm i

o i

Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 IN LINE CHEF.ilSTRY INSTRUf.iENTS OUT OF SERVICE This indicator shows the total number of in line chemistry system instrur ents out-of-service at the end of the reporting month. The chemistry systems inyt 1ad in this indi-cator include the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS).

At the end of August there was a total of 23 in-line chemistry instruments out of-S9nrice.

Of these instruments,19 were from the Secondary System and 4 were from PASS.

The number of PASS instruments reported for August has not changed since July. The entire secondary panelis considered out of service because of failure of the data logger and the Al 25 alarm card not being in place. Tne number of secondary instruments out-of-service has improved by one since July due to a water plant instrument being re-turned to service.

The increase that occurred after November 1991 in the number of Secondary instru-ments out of semice is due to a new method of determining if an instrument is out of service. The entire instrument channelis considered inoperative if: 1) the instrument is inoperative,2) the chart recorder associated with the instrument is inoperative,3) the alarm function associated with the instrument is inoperative. This change was made because if any of the functions named above are not operational, then the instrument is not periorming its intended function.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in line chemistry system instruments that are out of service has been set at 6. Six out of-service chemistry instruments make up 10% of all the chemistry instruments that are counted for this indicator.

Data Source: Patterson/Renaud (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None 47

t Montnly Wasta Produced (Kdograms)

Yearly Waste Produced (Kilograms)

Federal & State Monthly Urnit (Kg) 1000 -

800 y 600-e E

5 400-200 -

154.5 150 155 Bff,i f;gh';

y;f":

0[h O

O O

O 0

0 2

0 0

0 3

Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun' Jul Aug92 i

HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED This indicator shows the total amount c' W.rdous waste produced by Fort Calhoun each month. This hazardous waste consis, of non halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced.

During the month of August 1992,0 kilograms of non halogenated hazardous waste was produced, O kilograms of halogenated hazardous waste was produced, and 0 kilograms of other hazardous waste was produced. The yearly total ft nazardous waste produced is 305 kilograms.

The monthly total for the amount of halogenated hazardo'Js waste increapod in Decem-Der 1991 because of a change in the method of record kecping. HazardNs waste is no Imger counted on a monthly basis. It is counted based upon a full drum of wasto.

Date Source: Patterson/Henning (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Henning Adverse Trend: None 48 1

O

O Highest Exposure for the Month (mrem)

O Highest Exposure for the Quarter (mrem)

D Highest Exposure for the Year ginRem) 5000-OPPD 4500 mRemlyr. Limit 4000 -

3000 -

2000 -

1740 1000-

'JI

7 c: y 367

^

-[9 W 158 a;;

0

~

August MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE During August 1992, an individual accumulated 158 mrem which was the highest individual exposure for the month.

The maximum individual exposure to date for the third quarter of 1992 was 367 mRam.

The maxirrum individual exposurc reported for the year 1992 was 1,740 mrem.

The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem /

year. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis 1.500 mrem / year.

Date Source: FattersonAvilliams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None 49

O Month!y Personnel Contaminations Cumulative Personnel Contaminations iGOODI 300 -

-O-Fon Calhoun / nual Goal (144) 25 -

Cycle 14 237 Refuehng

[

j Outage l

)

200 -

s'

'U~

O O

O T

101 100-Ss

. T 50-y 25 2a d

5/

5 s

t we r _,

t, 7

0 I

6 i

'90

'91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS This indicator shows the number of skin and clothing contaminations for the reporting month. A total of 253 contaminations have occurred during 1992. There were 5 con-taminations during August 1992.

There was a total of 55 skin and clothing contaminations in 1991.

There was a total of 237 skin and clothing contaminations in 1990.

The 1992 goal for skin and clothing contaminations is 144.

Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend:- None SEP 15 & 54 50 t

O Decontarninated Radiation Controlled Area 100% -

l GOOD l

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal (non outage months)

Cycle 14 90%-

Refuehng O

O O

O 80% -

70% -

00%-

50 %

Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 DECONTAMIN ATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA This indicator shows the percentage of the RCA that is decontaminated (clean) based on the total square footage, a 1991 Fort Calhoun goal of 85% decontaminated RCA for non outage months and a 1992 goal of 88% decontaminated RCA for non-outage months.

At the end of the reporting month,87.2% of the total square footage of the RCA was decontaminated.

Date Source: Patterson /Gu ndal (Manage r/ Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend None SEP54 5 '.

..~

R Number of identified PRWPs co-Cycle 14 70-Refueling Outage

.Go-3m J'M So-inh Ve 39 40-j';'

m 3o-pg,,

y,p,5 hh Y

$b 20-W 1s

?

$[,h hh 11 1o-3,g,;

pg, y,y 4

M

A'-

4I'%

3 2

g A'Xc

'6%

b.

'E M

A o 'i 6

6 i

i i

i Sep01 Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator shows the number of Poor Radio-logical Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the reporting month. The PRWPs are identified through a review of the monthly Radiological Occurrence Reports and Personnel Contamination Reports.

The number of PRWPs which are identified each month should indirectly provide a-means to_ qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance.

During the month of August 1992, one_ PRWP was identified. The number of PRWPs for the month of July is high due to the forced outage from 7/3 through 7/23. The num-bers of PRWPs for the months of February, March and April are higher than the num-bers reported for previous months due to the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Pattersor1Lovett Adverse Trend: None SEP52 52

O Total Number of Hot Spots O

Number of Add t onal Hot Sp0ts identified O

Removal Plannec

-+- Cumulative Hot Spots Removed t

80-

-O-1992 Fort Calhoun Goal for Hot Spots Removed h

~

60 --

40-4 A

y 20 -

/

lf f

k

[

+$ -+f ~~+

~

[/$

Y h

g g -O-W'V 9

c M.EP M

N o

?

x 7

1 o_

i i

4 4

4 i

i i

i Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS This indicator shows the total number of i.t spots which have been identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been documented through the use of a hot spot identification sheet. A hot spot is defined as a smalllocalized source of high radiation. A hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item or piece of equipment is at least 5 times the General Area dose rate and the item or piece of equipment's dose rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem / hour.

At the end of August, there were 72 hot spots identified. 2 hot spots were removed during the month. 6 new hot spots were identified during the month.

Removalis planned for 17 hot spots.12 hot spots are still under evaluation.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to remove one hot spot per month.

Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Patterson/Lovett i

Adverse Trend: None l

53

MontNy Radioactive Gas Discha'ged (Curies) e Ratoame Gas Dscha'ged (Cees) 500 -

M

-O Cumulative Annua Goa!(Curies)

IGOODI 400 -

i 359 Y

q O

O O---O O

O O-O O

O O

O

}

300 -

g e

O!:

r 200 -

h 100 -

rg

=

N py;/,.

I i

1 0

i 3

'90

'91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec92 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT.

The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for Janu-ary 1,1992 through June 30,1992. A total of 140.7 curies have been released to the environment during this time.

The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1992 is 340 curies for this indica-tor.

The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.

Data Source: Franco /Knst (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Trausch Adverse Trend: None 54

O Monthly Rad:ca:t ve Liquid Dischmged Cumulative Rad;oa::ive Liou;d Discharged

-O-Cumulative Annua! Goal lGOODI 250-226 C

O O

O O--O--0---C O

O 200-175 176 150-E

'so 100 -

50-15 7 0.4 32 i

6 e

i i

e i

i i

i

'89

'90

'91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec92 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for January 1,1992 through June 30,1992. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environment from all sources totaled 39.5 curies during this time.

The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1992 is 225 curies.

The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.

l Data Source: Franco /Krist (Manager /Sourcei Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None l

l 55

O tbn System Fa'utes lGOODI y

30 -

25-20-17 14 15-10-8 7

5 l~

g

,3 2

2 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 0:t thv Dec92 l GOOD l 0 system Faiures i

80-

'73 Y

70 - F 60 -

y;{;

50 52 k@

y'(f 50-43 l

40-

~~

33

,39 h,

30- y

[

y 20- l}

p);

t 3

g g

16 10-

'?j

5

'g f*

g y

r 0

Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 LOGG ABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)

The Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) Indicator is depicted in two separate graphs. The top graph depicts the total number of loggable/ reportable non-system failures concerning Security Badges, Access Control and Authori2.ation, and Security Force Error, and Unsecured Docis. The bottom graph shows the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning system failures which occurred during the reporting month.

During the month of August 1992, there were 18 loggable/ reportable incidents identified.

System failures accounted for 16 (89%) of the loggable/ reportable incidents, and 7 (44%) of these were environmental,'ailures. Increased maintenance support, to include excellent preventive maintenance from all crafts involved, have made this the best reporting month to date.

Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sefick Positive Trend SEP 58 56

5 N25-5 O May$2 O Juiy sa 0 June'92 C August '92 E

Eg15-8:

E.

. 10-

~

e

~D 5-e 3

y 2'

2 m

1 1

. 1 k0 I

0 0 I I 0 0 I I 0 0

0 I I

0 I

I e

3 3

I C:

Badges Access Control Secunty Force Error Unsecured Doors SECURITY NON SYSTEM FAILURES This indicator shows the number of loggable/ reportable non system failures for the -

reporting month. These items include: Security Badges, Access Control and Authoriza-tion, Security Force Error, and Unsecured Doors.

Non-System Failures Number of incidents Aunust '92 July '92 Security Badges 1

2 Access Control and Authorization 0

1 Security Force Error 0

0 Unsecured Doors 1

Q Total 2

3 Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sefick Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 57'

O Environmental D Fativre

[c 9l 20-Y 15-10-4 5-3 3

2 2

2 I

I I

i I

i 0

Alarms CCTV Computer Search Equipment Doors 0 1991 System Failures C 1992 system Falures l GC)ODI 82 84 80-73 7,'

'O p

43

]

3 53 53 42 58 60-56 52 56 40-g:,

33 28 29 20-

{

16 0

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES This indicator shows the number of loggable/ reportable system failures for the reporting month. These items include: Alarm System Failures, CCTV failures, Security Computer Failures, Search Equipment Failures and Door Hardware Failures. Alarm systems and CCTV failures will be divided into two categories: environmental failures and failures as defined in the performance indicator definitions. Also, the 1991 and 1992 System Failures will be compared on a monthly basis.

System Number of incidents Aucust '92 Ju'y '92 Epvirons Failures Environs F ai!ures Aiarms 3

3 7

5 CCTV 4

2 3

7 Computer N'A 2

N/A 4

Search Equipment N/A 0

N'A 1

Door Hardware

((,6 2

Totals 7

9 10 19 Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sefick/Patterson l

Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 58

A 4.

+

14.=

=M 10%-

0 Amount of Work On Hold Awahing Parts 9%-

--O-1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals 8%-

7%-

6%-

Cycle 14 Refue!:ng 5%-

Outage

~'

4%-

C O

O O

O-O O-4 O

O O

-- O 3%-

2%-

(

1%-

x 0%

Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON-OUTAGE)

This procurement indicator displays the percentage of open, non-outage maintenance items that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total amount cf open, non-outage mainte-nance items.

There was a 'otal of 867 open, non-outage maintenance work orders (MWOs) with 26 (3.0%) of these MWOs on hold awaiting parts at the end of the reporting month.

The 1991 and 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals for tros indicator are to have less than 3.5% of the total number of open, non outage MWOs awaiting parts.

Data Source: Willrett/ CHAMPS (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Willrett/Fraser Adverse Trend: None 59

20-Spare Parts Inventory ValUe (5 Million) 15-w 10-

)

I 5-1 0

3 i

i Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE i

l The spare parts inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of August 1992

)

was reported as $12,601,36%.

]

Data Source: Steele/Huliska (Manager / Source) j Accountability: Willrett/McCormick j

Adverse Trend: None l

- Spare Parts issued ($ Thousands) 800-600-400-200-0 i

i i

i Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb_

Mar Apr May Jun Jul - Aug92 SPARE PARTS ISSUED -

Data for the month of August was not avaitable at the printing of the draft of this report.

The value of the spare parts issued during August 1992 totaled $154,068.49. The value of the spare parts issued for November and December 1991 was not available due to a printer problem.

Data Source: Steele/ Miser (Manager / Source)

' Accountability: Willrett/McCormick Adverse Trend: None 60

~

O Inventory Accuracy

--O--

Fon Calhoun Goa! (99%)

100% -

C 6-O-C-H O-E-C C

C Q

D e,

95%-

90%

~ '

Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Ma-Apr May Jan Jul Aug92 INVENTORY ACCURACY This indicator shows the accuracy of the actual parts count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained in the MMIS computer system for the reponing month.

During August,694 different line items were counted in the warehouse. Of the 694 line items counted,6 items needed count adjustments. The inventory accuracy for the month of August was reported as 100%. The Fon Calhoun 1991 & 1992 goals for this indicator are 98%.

Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Willrett/McCormrch Adverse Trend: None STOCKOUT RATE O

% of Pick Tickets Generatect When Parts are not Available, etc.

7%-

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 6%-

5%-

4%-

3%-

p n

n V

V V

w 20/, _

Q g_

Q

]"

'~

f.f IS l RR O

i-i-en Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92-This indicator shows the percentage of the number of Pick Tickets generated when the amount of pans requested is equal to or less than the minimum stocking level and parts are not available.

During August 1992,-a total of 1,245 Pick Tickets were generated. Of the 1,245 Pick Tickets generated,4 Pick Tickets (0.32%) were generated when the amount of parts l

requested was equal to or less than the minimum stocking level and parts were not available. The Fort Calhoun 1992 goal for this indicator is a maximum of 2.6% and the g

1991 goal was a maximum of 2.0%.

I Data Source: Wilfrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)

Accountability: WillretuMcCormick Adverse Trend: None 61

O

% of Totai purchases tnat ar.<pecited

-O-1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals (0.5%)

4%-

. Cycle 14 Refueling Outage 3%-

2% -

1%-

C O

O

-O O

CF CF-C O

O O

O.

0%

i i

Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 EXPEDITED PURCHASES This indicator shows the percentage of expedited purchases compared to the total number of purchase orders generated during the reporting month.

During August, there was a total of 268 purchase orders generated. There were no (zero) expedited purchases.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 0.5% The 1991 goal was 0.5%

The number of expedited purchases was above the Fort Calhoun goal during the months'of February, March and April 1992 due to the ordering of items related to the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

Date Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

- Accountability: Willrett/Fraser

. Adverse Trend: None 62 I

100-J 80-60-

~40-33 j

.l l

l 1

i Service invoices COE Invoices FAiscellaneous ItWOICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the number of service invoices, COE invoices, and miscellaneous invoices for the month of August 1992.

Date Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Wilfrett/Fraser Adverse Trend: None Percentage of Material Requests for issue witt, the b

Request Date the same as the Need Date 100 % -

-O-1991 Fort Cathoun Goal 80% -

~~"~

n 60% -

C O

O O

40% -

~

4 m$

t W

^

20%- p

,;[

c M

4 l

Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING i

This indicator shows the percentage of mater,al requests (MRs) for issue with their.

request date the same as their need date compared to the total number of MRs for issue for the reporting month. The 1991 goal of 60% is also shown.

I During the mo' nth of August, a total of 1,245 MRs were received by the warehouse. Of the 1,245 total MRs received by the warehouse,100% of the MRs (738) were for issue with their request date the same as their need date.

Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Willrett/McCormick Adverse Trend: None G3 l

500 -

O Totai uoettication pa2kages open 425 425 400 -

^

337-n 300 -

I 277 274 n,n

.- J 1

264 s

L e

b 172 176 173 16e e

9,9 i

i i

,100

~

'88

'89

'90 Sep91 Oct Nov' Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun. Jul Aug92 OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding modifications (fLxcluding outstand-ino modifications which are crocosed to be cancelled).

Cateaorv Reoortina Month Form FC 1133 Backlog /In Progress 19 Mod. Requests Being Reviewed 19-Design Engr. Backlog /in Progress 65 Construction Backlog /In Progress 28 Design Engr. Update Backloatin Progress 29 Total 160 At the end of August,37 additional modification requests had been issued this year and j-

-20 modification requests had been cancelled. The Nuclear Projects Review Committee (NPRC) had completed 121 backlog modification request reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) had completed 90 backlog modification request reviews this year.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source)

Scofield/Lounsbery (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Scofield/Phelps Adverse Trend: None 64

O Temporary Modihcations >1 cycle old (RFO required for Removat)

O Temporary Modih0ations >6 montns old (Removab!e on.hne)

-O-Fort Calnoun Goal for Temporary Mod:h0ations >1 cycle old (0) 6-5-

4,

3-2 2

2-1-

$'l 0

0 0

0 O'

O' O

i i

June'92 July '92 August '92 TEfAPORARY FAODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING)

This indicator provides information on the number of temporary modifications greater than one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage (RFO) fo" removal and the number of temporary modifications removable on-kne that are greater than six months old. Also provided is the Fort Calhoun goal for temporary modifications.

There are currently no temporary modifications that are greater than one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage to remove. In addition, at the end of August there were 2 temporary modifications installed that were greater than six months old that can be removed on-line These were: handjack close of CCW/RW valves, in which OPS is reviewing a system engineering suggestion for closure; potable water supply piping temporary repair, which is awaiting completion of tAWOs 894520 and 92718.

At the end of August, there was a total 0118 TfAs installed in the Fort Calhoun Station.

11 of the 18 installed TMs require an outage for removal and 7 are removable on-line, in 1992 a total of 56 temporary modifications have been installed.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Gorence Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 & 71 o

05

GO-O June'92 O Juir 92 40-O August '92 30-19 20-

+

<%%29

$$l8A 10-U U

Ibb #

0:

0 3 months 3 6 months

>0 months System Engineering O June'92 30,,

50-July '92 49 43 42 O August '92 40-34

.Me?A,p 30 M2ME ffh)hk 30-25 M$$

~

MM6w; zg?;gc hhhb hhh h

o IE#'

4 i

i o 3 months 3-G months

>6 months l

Design Engineering ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST (EAR) BREAKDOWN This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of EARS assigned to Design Engineer-ing and System Engineering awaiting a technical response from engineering.

At the end of August 1992,48 EARS had been resolved and were going through the closeout process. There were 3 EARS awaiting a technical response from Nuclear Projects.

Total EAR breakdown is as follows:

EARS opened during the month

.8 EARS closed during the month 15 Total EARS open'as of the end of the month 133 Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti (Manager / Source) -

Accountability: Jaworski/Phelps Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 66

i 400-O ECNs Backlogged in DEN 350-O ECNs Opened During the Month O ECNs Completed During the Month 250-Cycle 14 Refue!,ng 200 Outage 7

~

150-100-

~

r m

-7

-j?

(

! -',3 jj 3;

y

-,y 7

50-c g

_7

~

8 i

i;

~h

~

[

h j

I)

D

}

+

9 o

e 9

7 x

g g

^

n i

i i

a a

i i

i Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS This indicator shows the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) awaiting completion by DEN, the number of ECNs opened during the reporing month, and the number of ECNs completed by DEN during the reporting month, At the end of August 1992, there was a total of 151 DEN backlogged open ECNs.

There were 45 ECNs opened, and 54 ECNs completed during the month.

Although the number of open ECNs is currently high, activities are in progress to reduce the backlog of open ECNs. It is expected that the number of open ECNs will continue to decrease.

Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti (Manag er/ Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 67 r-

-p

-r y

7

O DEN Engineering not complete O System Engineering Engineering complete, response under review Q Maintenance - MWO scheduled, but work not complete O uainienance uwO compiete. awaiting ciosecut 86 60 39 n8 6

l i

2 0

s 2

2 i

i i

0 - 3 mcnths 3 - 6 months

> 0 months ECN FACILITY CH ANGES OPEN O DEN - Engineering not complete System Engineering - Engineering complete, response under review Maintenance MWO scheduled. but work not complete O uaintenance - MwO compiete. awaiting ciosecut 84 Bs lI 46 l C 17 12 1s 14 MWil 8

s o

6 6

gggj..

y 4

i i

0 - 3 months 3 - 6 months

> 6 months ECN SUBSTITUTE REPL ACEMENT ITEMS OPEN O DEN - Engineering not complete O System Engineering - Walkdown or conbrmation r'ot complete 70-60 60-50-40-30-23 20-7 10 lh~

0 0

0 - 3 months 3 6 months

> 6 months ECN DOCUMENT CHANGES OPEN ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE GREAKDOWN This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) that are assigned to Design Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engineering,.

and Maintenance for the reportir? month. The graphs provide data on ECN FacilL*,

Changes Open, ECN Substitute Replacement items Open, and ECN Document Changes Open.

Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti (Manag er/ Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 68 s

l 1992 Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate l

5-

[GOODI

>'s 1991 Recordable injury / Illness Frequercy Rate 1

4.5 -

Y

-O-1992 Fort Calhoun Goal (2.0) 35-3-

y 2.5 -

/

2-O O

O /O D

O O

O 1.5 -

1-o.5 -

0 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul rug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY RATE This inoicator shows the 1992 recordable injury / illness cases frequency rate. The 1991 recordable injury / illness cases frequency rate is also shown.

A recordable injurv/ illness case is reported if Nuclear Operations Division personnel are injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid. The record-able injury / illness cases frequency rate is computed on a year-to-date basis.

The recordable injury / illness rate for January through August 1992 was reported as 3.28. There were two recordable injury / illness cases reported during the month of August. There has been a total of 13 recordable injury / illness cases in 1992.

The recordable injury / illness rate for the past twelve months is 3.25.

The 1992 goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 2.0.

Year Record 3ble Cases Year-End Ratst 1989 11 2.2 1990 11 2.1 1991 18 3.3 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Richard Adverse Trend:The manager of the Safety Department has stated that, based on this indicator's 1992 values being above the 5 year average values, an adverse trend is indicated.

SEP 15,25 & 26 69

Ucensee Event Repocs 46 Personne! Errors Reported in LERs

~ '

Cuma!ative U:ensee Event Repons

0*

--+- Cumu ative Personne: Errors Reposed in LERs 31 3

$2 h;%

30" 9

29 3:k 26 i

E

j i

4

.i h'

k h

5 20-

g\\ 14 l -;

12 g-

.s.

[ h 10-i;

i L

- + - +

?

i5 34

ij 5

~

t ii

i Q( q h-]

1

_,[q L,

i i

iO i

i i

'88

'89

'90

'91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov De092 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERS This indicator shows the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) submitted during each month of 1992, the LERs attributed to ps.rsonnel errors for each month, and the cumulative totals of both. The year-end totals for the four previous years are also shown.

In August, there was a total of 5 LERs reported; one of whUn was attributed to licensed personnel error. The single licensed personnel error was reported in LER 92-025, "inaavertent Manual Start of Emergency Diesel Generator at Local Control Pane Data Source: Short/ Lippy (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 70 i

.~

Q Administrative Contrc.1 Problem O Licensed Operator Error

[Q Other Personnel Error Q Maintenance Probtem 5-89"

"*"" " "5 Q Equipment Failures 4-3-

2-1-

3 g

O

~

i i

i Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the LERs by report date broken down by Root Cause Code for each of the past twelve months from September 1,1991 through August 31,1992.

The cause codes are intended to identify possible programmatic deficiencies. In order to be consistent with industri reporting, the Root Cause Codes have been revised to reflect the NRC's sequence coding. For detailed descriptions of these codes, see the

" Performance Indicator Definitions" section of this report.

Data Source: Short/ Lippy (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 71

O Actual Division Staffing O Authorized Division Staffing 600~

522 S33 400-218 226 200-50 50 0

i i

Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Nuclear Services STAFFING LEVEL The authorized and actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions.

Data dource: Sorer. an/ Burke (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Waszak Adverse Treno: None SEP 24

--C}-

Nuclear Opr ations Division Turnover Rate

- Production Engineering Division Turnover Rate 10%-

--O-Nuclear Services Division Turnover Rate 8%-

M A

6% -

4%-

W 3

1 2%-

C O

O O

W v

0%

O O-v A91 M91 J91 J91 A91 S91 091 N91 D91 J92 F92 M92 A92 M92 J92 J92 A92 PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The turnover rates for the three Divisions are calculated using only resignations from

OPPD, Division Turnover Rate NOD 2.3%

PED 3.7%

NSD 0.0%

Currently, the OPPD corporate turnover rate is being reported as approximately 2.5%.

This OPPD corporate turnover rate is based on the turnover rate over the last four years.

Data Snurce: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Waszak Adverse Trend: Nono 72

60 -

O. Total Requalification Training Hours O simutator Training Hours O Non Requalification Training Hours O Number of Exam Failures 41 40-36 36 36 36

~30-20-b 16 ic

/

14 14 14

~

,[

10-g u

y 0

Cycle 91-5 Cycle 91-6 Cycle 917 Cycle 921 Cycle 92-2 Cycle 92-3 Cycle 92 - 4 LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING This indicator provides information on the total number of hours of training given to each crew during each cycle. The Simulator training hours shown on the graoh are a subset of the intal training hours. Non-Requalification Training Hours are used for AOP/EOP verification & validation, INPO commitments, GET, Fire Brigade, Safety Meetings, and Division Manager lunches.

Exam failures are defined as failures in the written, simulator, and Job Performance Measures (JPME) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training.

The 6 exam. failures in Cycle 92-4 are rotational written quizzes. Additionally, one crew failed a weekly simulator evaluation. The individuals who failed the simulator scenario were remediated and returned to shift by the end of the requalification week. All of the individuals who failed e written quiz have been remediated, with one exception. That individualis co'nside:ed acceptable for continued shift operations, but is being remediated in exam taKing skills.

Data Source: Gasper /Guliani (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gasper /Guliani Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 73

30-O S90 Exams Adrninistered O sRO exams Passed D RO Exams Administered O RO Exams Passed 20-i 4,I

.]

~

10-

~

W-0 1

i I

I I

i i

i I

i i

l Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Opera-tor (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally adminis-tered quizzes and exams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress.

During the month of August 1992, there were 16 internally administered SRO exams taken and 15 of these exams were passed.

Also during August, there were 19 internally administered RO exams given and 18 of.

these exams were passed.

There were no NRC administered SRO or RO exams during August.

.During the month of June 1992, there were 3 RO and 7 SRO exams administered by tne NRC. OPPD was notified in July that all 3 ROs and all 7 SROs passed these ex-a m s.

Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gasper /Guliani Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 -

74

O( 'er Trainino (1.000 Hrs )

' ll Geraral Ernployee Trair:ng (1,000 hrs )

O Technical Support (1,000 Hrs.)

o O Chemistry and Radiation Protection (1,000 Hrs )

O uaintenance <1.000 Hrs >

g

@ Operations (1,000 Hrs )

g 29 5

2-m:

E E

nn 3

i

~

3 g

h

?

w.,

s

=

~

=

E 5

9

=

i i

e i

i i

i

-- i Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS This indicator shows the total number of instruction hours for Operations, Maintenance.

Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training, and Other Training conducted for the I: ort Calhoun Station.

Due to the transition of responsibilities for training performance indicators, data for the month of May was unavnHable for this indicator.

This indicator is normally one month behind the reporting month due to the time re-quired for data collection and process ng.

DEPARTMENT Julv '92 Operations 366

. Maintenance 179

. Chernistry and Radiation Protection 386 Technical Support 239 General Emp!oyee Training 195 Other 30 Total 1.395 Data Source: Gasper /Podoll (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gasper Adverse Trend: None 75

O Other Train,ng (1,000 Hrs )

D General Employee Training (1,000 hrs )

30-.

O Technical Support (1,000 Hrs.)

O chemstry and nad,ation erotection (1.000 Hrs )

25~

O uaintenan:e (1,000 Hrs ;

n 5

] Operations ($.000 Hrs.)

20-F C) 3

$15-E E

g 10--

8 5-T 2

9 m

C

=

3 3

E

=

E Z

=

0

~

- ~,

i Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TR AINING This indicator shows the total number of student bours for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, Genera 1 Employee Training, and Other Training conducted for the Fort Calhoun S'ation.

Due to the transition of responsibilities for training performance indicators, data for the month of May was unavailable for this indicator.

This indicator is normally one month behind the repor1iag month due to the time needed to collect and evaluate the data.

OEPARTtMNT Jf'92 I

Operations 1,573 Maintenance 259 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 1,1 64 Technical Suppor1 845 o

General Employee Tra:ning 888 Other 39 Total 4,768 Data Source: Gasper /Podoll (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gasper Adverse Trend: None 76

l 9-Volations per 1.000 Intpection Hours

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal

[0000l 1

Y C

d i c --

4 ha

?

8 c>

3.7

+-

t 2

~

i<

C93-

~

z;;

g;

$N

. ?/ '

?,

k 0

-O O

O O'

O O

O 1.2 Q

T Y

[h, [-,[

i i

~

0-i i

i

'89 '90 '91 Aug91 Sep 0;1 flov Dec Jan feb IAar Apr t/ay Jun Jul92 VIOLATIOi1S PER 1,000 llJSPECTIOlJ HOURS This indicator displays the number of f JRC violations cited in inspection reports per 1,000 IJRC inspection hours. This indicator is one month behind the reponing month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data.

The violations per 1,000 inspection hours indicator was repoded as 2.70 for the twelve months from August 1,1991 through July 31,1992. This is due to the number of viola-tions issued during this time period in comparison to the relatively low number of inspec-tion hours for this same time period, The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis a maximum of 1.5 violations per 1,000 inspection hours.

The goal was a maximum of 1.6 violations per 1,000 inspection hours for 1991.

Data Source: Shon/ Lippy (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Short Adverse Trend: None 77

Fort Calhoun 2.7 Cooper 0.79 RWer Bend

.92 Commanche Peak 1.31 Wolf Creek 3.16 Arkansas One 1.07 South Texas 2.45 Waterford 2.89 0

0.5 1

1.5 2

2.5 3

3.5 d

Violations per 1.000 inspection Hours COMPARISOf1 OF VIOLAT: >f4S AMOlJG REGIOlJ IV PLAtJTS This indicator provides a comparison of violations per 1,000 inspection hours among Region IV nuclear power plants. The data is compiled for a twelve month period from August 1,1991 through July 31,1992.

The Fort Calhoun goal for 1992 is a maximum of 1.5 violations per 1,000 inspection hours. The goal for 1991 was a n,aximum of 1.6 violations per 1,000 inspection hours.

This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data.

Data Source: Short/ Lippy (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Short Adverse Trend: None 78

25 -

-+- fJumber et Violations During the Last 12 Months 4- !Jumber of fJCVs During the Last 12 Months 20-U 10 y

15 / N 15 15-j y

v 10-B 7

7

'f 7

V K,s /

5-4 4

4 3/

V V

3 3

0 0

S V

^

\\

0 i

3 i

Aug91 Sep Oct tJoy Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju!92 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AtJD !JCVs (TWELVE MONTH RUNNING TOTAL)

The Cumulative Violations and Non Cited Violations (NCVs) indicator shows the cumu-lative number of violations and the cumulative number of NCVs for the last twelve months.

This indicator is one month behind the repor1ing month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data for this indicator, Data Source: Short/ Lippy (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Short Adverse Trend: None 79

~

O Tctat Outstand.ng CARS O Outstand:n; cans > six Montns Oid G Outstand:ng CARS That Are fed.hcation Related 100-p, y

50-

~

3

~'

I 0

Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan P tb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug92 OUTSTANDif4G CC7RECTIVE ACTIOf4 REPORTS This indicator shows the total number of outitanding Corrective Action Reports (CARS),

the number of outstanding CARS that are gritater than six months old, and the number of outstanding CARS that are modification related.

At the end of August 1992, there were 76 outstanding CARS,29 CARS that were greater than six months old, and 2 CARS that were modification related.

Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Andrews/Gamohir/ Gates Adverse Trend: None 80

O nod Overdue CARS 15-NOD C ARs With Extensions Granted 10-b 5 --

3 1

3 n

M0 0

0n 0

0 0

0 00 0

0 Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb fAar Apr fAay Jun Jul Aug92

'0-O PED Overdue CARS 15 --

O PED C ARs With Ex1ensions Granted 10 -

0 6

5 5~

4 4

5 2

3

~

n 0

O Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb IAar Apr lAay Jun Jul Aug92 20 -

O Other Overdue CARS Other CARS With Extensions Granted 10 -

5-3 00 Ob 00 0 [~]

OO OO OO OO i',

00 M00 i

i i

Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb tAar Apr

'Aay Jun Jul Aug92 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the number of overdue CARS and the number of CARS which received extensions broken down by organization.

Overdue CARS

~

Overdue CARS June'92 July '92 August '92 NOD 0

0 0

PED 0

0 0

Others 0

1 0

i Total 0

1 0

Extended CARS Extended CAks June'92 July '92 August '92 NOD 2

0 6

PED 6

2 4

Others 0

1 0

Total 6

3 9

Data Source: Oii/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Andrews/Gambhir/ Gates Adverse Trend: None 81

1991 SALP Funct.

Area CARS Signif. C ARs tJAC Viola.

LERs A) Plant Operations 30 1

1 6

B) Radiolog. Controls 12 0

O C) Maintt3urveil, 06 0

9 D) Ernergency 16 0

0 0

Preparedness E) Security 5

0 1

3 F) EngrAcch Suppor1 93 3

1 12 G) Safety Assess' 27 1

1 2

Qual. Verif, H) Othef 0

0 0

0 Total 249 5

0 32 1992 SALP Funct.

Area CARS Signif. C ARs NRC Viola.

LERs A) Plant Operationc 14 0

0 7 (1)

B) Radiolog. Controls 11 0

0 0

C) Maint' Surveil.

94 (0) 1 3

11 (2)

D) Emergency 4

1 1

0 Preparednesa E) Security 8

0 1 (1) 0 F) Engr / Tech Suppori 24 (3) 0 1

11 (2)

G) Safety Assess >

25(9) 0 0

0 Oual. Verif, H) Othef 0

0 0

0 Total 180(18) 2 12 (1) 29 (5)

Note:() indicate values fof the reporting month.

CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIFICANT CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs. LERs REPORTED The above matrix shows the number of Corrective Action Reports (CARS) issued by the Nuclear Services Division (NSD) vs. the number of Significant CARS issued by NSD vs.

the number of violations issued by the NRC for the Fon Calhoun Station in 1991 and 1992. Included in this table is the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) identified by the Station each year. The number of NRC violations reported is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the violations.

i Data Source: Orr/Gunis (Manager / Source)

Short/ Lippy (Manager /burce)

Accountability: Andrews/Gambhir/ Gates Adverse Trend: None SEP 15,20,21 82

500 -

Total Outage MWOs

--+- Paris Hold

-O-MWOs Ready to Work

-)( - Engineering Hold

-V-Outage MWR Ba:klog Planning Hold 400 -

300 -

200 -

,B l

100-0-

t Jun92 Jul Aug Sep 0:t Nov Dee Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep93 MWO PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 15 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) that have been approved for inclusion in the Cycle 15 Refueling Outage and the number of MWOs that are ready to work (parts staged, planning complete, and all other paperwork ready for field use). Also included is the number of MWOs that have engineering holds (ECNs, procedures and other miscellaneous engineering holds), parts hold, (parts staged, not yet inspected, parts not yet arrived) and planning hold (job scope not yet completed). Maintenance Work Requests (MWRs) will also be shown that have been identified for the Cycle 15 Refueling Outage and have not yet been converted to MWOs.

Approximately 2,176 Maintenance Work Orders were completed during the Cycle 14.

Refueling Outage.

Data Source: Patterson/Clemens (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Johansen Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 l

l l

83 1

50-

- Total Outage Projects

-O-Projects with Prehminary Schedules Submittec Projects with Detailed Schedules Submitted 30-20-10-0 0

El 5

Jun92 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nw Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep93 OVER ALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 15 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the status of the projects which are in the scope of the Cycle 15 Refueling Outage. There are currently 14 approved outage projects.

Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available.

Dt.ta Source: Patterson/Clemens (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Boughter Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 1

84 I

Total Outage f,iod.f.:atons 40-

- Mot w :h Fina! Des gn Issued Mocs App'oved for Construction 30-

-+- Mods Ready for Construction 20-10 -

0 CA 4

Jun92 Jul Aug Sept 0;t Nov DOC Jan Feb Mar Ao' May Jan Jul Aug Sep93 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 15 OUTAGE lAODIFICATIOt1 PLAtitilf1G This indicator shows the status of modifications approved for completion during the Cycle 15 Refueling Outage.

The "idods with Final Design Issued" status indicates that DEN's work on the modifica-tion is 98% complete. The "tdods Approved for Construction" status indicates that the PRC has approved the final design and DEN's work on the modification is 100% com-plete. The

Mods Ready for Construction" status indicates that the CWOs and proco-dures are complete, and the materialis ready (Construction Management Group's action).

Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available.

Data Source: Patterson!Clemens (idanager/ Source)

Accountability: Gambhir/Phelps/Faulhaber Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 85

._. __ ~

PERFORfAAtJCE IfJDICATOR DEFitilTIOfJS i

AGE OF OUTSTANDING fAAlf1TENAfdCE WORK OR.

COfAPONEf1T FAILURE Af1ALYSIS REPORT (CFAR)

DERS SUfAfAARY This indicator tracks the total number of outstanding cor-The number of INPO categones for fort Cathoun Station rective ncn outage lAaintenance Wo* Orce s at the Fon un sigmfcantly higher (1E45 standard devianons) faih Cathoun Stahon versus their age in mon hs ure rates than the lost of the industry for an eightee.:

month time period Failures are reponed as component AfAOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITitJG PARTS (i e pumps, motors, val.es, ete ) and apphcahon (i e.

This indicator is dehned as the percentage of open, ncn-cha'ging pumps, main steam stop valves, control ele-outage, rnaintenance work orders that are on hold awa't-ment dove motors, ete ) categones ing parts, to the totat number of open, non. outage, ma n, Fadure Cause Categones o'e:

tenance work orders.

Weat Out' Aging a fadure thought to be the conse-Quence of espected wear or ag ng.

AUXIUARY FEEDWATER SYSTEfA SAFETY SYSTEfA Manuf actunng Defect a f aJure attnbutable to inad-PERFORMAf1CE equate ar,semb!y ot "utial quahty of the resacmble com-The sum of the known (planned and unptanned) unavah pone.it or system.

able hours and the estimated unavadable hours for the Engineenng' Design a fa6e et nbutabte to the inad-auxibary feed ^ater system for the reporting penod d" eavate design of the responubte cornponent or system.

vided by the crincal hours f or the repodmg penod mu to O'her Devces a f adure attnbutabte to a f adure or i

phed by the number of trains in the asii.ary fee % vater m$operahon of another component or system, including system atsociated devices fAaintenance'Tenng a f aaure that is a result of im-AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF p*oper maintenance or teshng, lack of maintenance,or HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS personnel errors that occur dunng maintenance or test.

The cumulative hours that the Component Coo!ing Water ing actmtiet pefiormed on the responsible Component or tystem is outside the staten chemistry hmit The hours system, including f adure to fohon procedures.

are accumulated from the first sample exceeding the hmrt Errors f adures attobutable to incorrect procedures that until additionaf tamphng shows the parameter to be back were foMowed as wntien, improper installation of equfp within limits.

ment, and personnel errors (including f ailure to follor 1

procedarss property) Also included in this Category are CARS ISSUED vs. StGtJ1FICANT CARS vs. NRC VIO.

f adurss for which the cause is unknown er cannot be as.

LATIONS vs. LERs REPORTED s:gned to any of the preceding categories.

Provides a mmparison of C ARr, issued. NRC volabons, and Lens reponed. This indicator tracks performance CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER for SEP a15,20, & 21.

THAN 3 lAONTHS OLD The percentage of total outstanding corrective ma,nte-CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE nonce stems, not requiring an outage, that are greater Compares the Fon Calhoun check valve f ailure rate to than three months old at the end of the penod reponed, the industry chock valve f adute rate (f ailures por 1 mimon component hours). The data for the industry f adute rate CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS & NON CITED VIOLA.

is three months behind the Pl Report reporung month.

TIONS (12 MONTH Ruf JNING TOTAL)

This indicator tracks periormance for SEP 843.

The et.mulative number of violatons and Non-Cited Vio-latinns for the last 12 rnonths.

COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE Collective radiaton exposure is the total external whole.

DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT body dose received by a!! on site peaonnel(including This indicator shows the dady core thermat output as contractors and visitors) during a time period, as mea-measured f*om computer point XC105 (in thert,J mega-sured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD). Coh watts) The 1500 MW Tech Spec hmrt, and the unmet lective radiation esposure is reporteo in units of person.

porton of the 1495 MW FCS daily goal for the reporting rem. This indicator tracks rad clogical work performance month are amo shown.

for SEP #54.

DIESEL GENERATOR RELIA 0lLITY (25 DEMANDS)

COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV Th:s indicator shows the number of f ailures occurnng for PLANTS ca:;h emergency d.esel generator during the last 25 start Provides data on volatn.ms per 1,060 inspecten hours demands and the last 25 icad run demands.

for Regen IV nuclear power p! ants DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY This indicator provides monthly data on the number of hours of d:eselgenerator planned and unplanned un-avadabil.ty.

86

,w-y n

m-e

.y,,..

y-,,_

y5,-m,

,_,,._,.,-m

,,,-,,,,,_,.y_-

,..,.._m.

.mw....

.,,,. -...~_..i"

l l

PERFORfAAtJCE If1DICATOR DEFitJITIOllS (cont'd)

DECOf4TAfAlf1ATED RADIATIOfJ COf 4 TROLLED AREA A) A bad r n cf any durat on t*at resuP5 from a rea au-u The percentage of the Rad at:on Cont'CPed A'ea. an.ch tomahc cr manualintahon includes the ausuhary buJdag, the rMwattw LJeg, and D) A tcac-run test to sattt, the p: ant's bad and cur & ten f

areas of the C RP teding, that is cecontamnatec bned as stated m each test s specucatons-on the total scure footage it..s nc cator t'ans pedo" C) OFer toec at teus in who the emergency generator mance for SEP

54 is opected to be operated for at least one hos whoe bacea ch at isnt 50% of rs desgn bac DISADLING IfJ.IURY FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME o fJumber of Loac.Run f ac res A load-run f acute u

ACCIDENT RATE) shoWd be corted for any reason in whch the emer-T h:s mdicator is cohned as the nebe c' ardents f or gency geneator dces not p a up bas and run as pre-all vtaty pesonne' permanenry ass.pned to t' e ttaton.

d cted FaNres c'e counted d/ng any vahd bad.rvn involving days away f rom wo'> per 200 000 r amhours demands worked (103 man-yeart) Thu c:es re rc:;de contra:

W E gepacns Umuxessf ul atten pts to stad or bad run tot personnel lhis incator t'a:e s pe't onM De or-s6ould not De Counted as Vahd demands or f 3 iUfes when d

mance for SEP *?5 & M they can tw aNrtuted to any cf he tonow;ng-t A) Sou* ::vs tr.ps tut wesa be tapassed in the event c!

DOCUMEtJT REVIEW (DIENNI AL) an empency The Document Renew Ind'eator thow s the rW ber o' B; t.%nctcn o' e:;u p~ent ttat is not requeed dunng documents reviewed, the nu rber cf nD:sments tched-an eme'gercy uled for review and the n.rr b( r cf document cerews C)Intentenat terminaten o' a tett because of abnormal that a'e overdue for the repanmg month A docummt cc% tons that would not have res#ed in ma,or diesel renew is considered overdse t' the renew is not com-generator damage or repa:r.

plote within C months of the atsgud due cate l h ts D) fAa"unctens or operatag erors which would have not indcator tracks performance for SEP adC prevented the emerrncy generator tram bem; restaqed and brought to bad unin a f ew minutes EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM E) A f adure to start because a pon on of the starting sys.

PERtORMANCE tem was d sabled for tee purpose, if fo!! owed by a suc-The sum of the known (pianned and unplanned) unava't-cessf at start wrth the starting system in ris normat abgn-able and the ett. mated unavadable hours for the emeb m ont gency AC power tystem for the repo't ng perac deded Each emergency generator f atiure that resutts in the gen-g by the number of hours in the report.ng perod mu!Lphed erator being declared inoperable should be counted as by the number of trains in the emergency AC mwer sys-one demand and one f adure. Emploratory tests danng tem corrective maintenance and the succostful test that fol.

bas repair to vehty operabity should not be counted as EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIADll-demands or f adures when the EDG has not been co-ITY c!ared operable a;a n This indicator shows tne number of f adures that were reported dunng the last 20. 50, and 100 eme gency d+

ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST (EAR) selgenerator de f. ands at the Fon Calnoun Staten Also DREAKDOWN shown are Ingger values which correlate to a hgh level Th:s indcator shows a breakdown. by age of the E A9. of of conhoence that a untt's diesel generators have ob-the number of EARS ass'gned to Design Eng!neer ng tatned a rehabity of greater than of equal to 95% when Nuclear and System Engineenng This indicator tracks the demand f adures are less than the Ingger values performance for SEP #C2

1) Number o! Start Demands All vaha and inadverient

,tri d; manas, inctading at! stad on'y demands and aH ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) DREAM-start demands that are followed by bad run cemancs.

DOWN whether by automatic or mtnualintt:at on. A start only This indicato' breaks down the number of Engineering demand is a demand in which the em?rgency generatcr Change Notces (ECNs) that a'e assigned to Desrgn is started. but no attempt is made to bad the generator.

Eng;neent.g Nuclear (DEN), Sptem Eng neenng and

2) Number of Stan Fadures: Any f adure within the emen Ma:ntenance. The graphs proode data on ECN Fac.hty gency generator system that proverts the generator from Changes open, ECN Subshtute Rep!acement Par.s ach,ev:ng specified frequency anc voltage is c:assified as open. and ECN Document Changes open This irid'eator a vahd tiart f adure Th:s inctuces any cond. ton ioent.f.ed tracks performance for SEP *02 in the course of maintenance inspec9ons (ch the emen gency generator in standoy moce) that ochmtely wou:d ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) ST ATUS have resuhed in a sta1 f ave it a demand has occurred The number et ECNs that were opened. ECNs that were

3) Number of Load-Run Demancs For a vahd bad.run comp:eted, and open baWog ECNs awa4mg compiehon demana to be counted the bad-run attempt rnast meet by DEN for tne reportng month Tn s nd:cator tracks one or more of the fohoung er tena per ormance for SEP *C2 4

67

f PERFORfA AfJCE IfJDICATOR DEFilJITIOi4S (Cont'd)

EOUIPMEtJT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1,000 CR'TI-GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEltJG DIS-CAL HOURS CHARGED TO THE EtJVIRotJMEfJT Eavipment forced outages per 1000 cntica! hours is the This indcator disp:ays the total number of Cunes of ali inverse of the mean 1:me bete een forced outages gaseous rad.oachve nuchces released from FCS, caus9d by eavipment f ai!uros The mean t me is equal to the number of hours the reactor is cra calin a period GROSS HEAT RATE l

(1000 ocurs) dtvided by the number of forced outages Oross heat rate is defingd as the rato of tota! thermal caused by equipment fa4res in that perco.

energy m Breish Therma! Un:ts (DTV) produced by the reactor to the total oross electrical energy produced by EOUlVALEf4T AVAILABILITY FACTOR the generator in A:!owatt hours (KWH)-

This indicator is defined as the rat:0 of gross avadab e generaton to gross maximum gene'aton, expressed as HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED a percentage. Avai!ab!e generabon is the energy that The tetat amount (in Kaograms) of ncn halogenated haz-can be produced if the vn.t is operated at the maximum ardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other power level permftted by nuipment and reg /atory tr%

hazardous waste produced by FCS each month.

tations Maomum generaton is the energy tnat can be produced by a umt in a gWen pened if operated continu.

HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY ltJJECTIOt1 SYSTEM ously at maximum caparty.

SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMAtJCE The sum of the known (ptanned and unplanned) unavad-EXPEDITED PURCHASES ab;e hours and the estimated unavadab's hours for the The percentage of expedded purchases occurrmg dunng hign pressure safety mjecton system for the reporting the reporting month compared to the total number of pur-penod d vided by the crit: cal hours for the reporting pe-chase orders generated, rcd muttipted by the number of tra:ns en the high pres-Sute safety injecton system.

FORCED OUTAGE RATE This indicator is defined as the percentage of time that ItJ Lif4E CHEMISTRY IfJSTRUMEtJTS OUT OF SER-the unit was unavailabre due to forced events compared VICE to the time planned for electreal gene'at.on Forced Total number of in line chemistry instruments that are events are f ailures or other unplanned cond; tons that out of service an the Secondary System and the Post r6Quite removing the unit from service before the end of Accident Sampling System (PASS).

the next weekend. Forced events include start-up f aib ures and events initiated while the unit is in reserve Shut-ItJVEtJTORY ACCURACY down (te., the urut is avatacle but not in service).

The percentage of kne t' ems that are counted each month by the warehouse which need count adpstments.

FUEL RELI ABILITY ltJDICATOR This indicator is defined as the steady-state primary cool-itJVOICE BREAKDOWrJ ant 1131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contti.

The number of invoices that are on hold due to the!! Lfe, buton and normahzed to a common purificaten rate.

COE, and miscellaneous reasons.

Tramp uranium is f uel whch has been deposaed on re-actor core internals from previc s defective f uelor is LICEtJSE CAtJDlbATE EXAMS present on the surface of fuel elements from the manu-This indicator shows the number of SRO and'or RO qui:

4 facturing process. Steady state is defined as continuous zes and exams that are admirustered and passed each operation for at least three days at a power levet that month. This indcator tracks training portormance for does not vary tuore than + o' 5% Plants should conect SEP866.

data for this indicator at a power level above 85% y hen possible. Plants that did not operate at steady state LICEtJSED OPFRATOR REQU ALIFICATIOrd TRAf tJ.

power above 85% should col:ect data for tNs indcator at itJG the highest steady state power levet attained curing the The total number of hours of training given to each crew month.

during each cycle. A!so pavided are the simulator train-The density correcton factor is the ratio of the spec,fic ing hours (which are a subset of tne total traitung hours),

volume of coolant at the RCS opi ating temperature tne number of non requahficaton training hours and the (540 degrees F., VI- 0.02146) diviced by the specife number of exam f ailures. This ind:cator tracks training l

volume of coolant at normalletdown temperature (120 performance for SEP #68.

degrees F at outlet of the letdown cochng heat ex.

changer,Vf. 0.016204), whch su!!s in a densay cor-rection factor for FCS equal to 122.

i 88

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFil TlOf S (cont'd)

LICENSEE EVEf 4T REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE MAINTEf 4 AtJCE OVERTIM* E BREAKDOWN Tr4, *4 c4 onnm hos s con oa,ed to nyr a' wrs f,

e 7his lodicator shows th9 numbd and rOct caste cc0e fpr

artenance Thismcycesoppo

,y, r

lKensee [ vent Reports lhe ro;l Cade Codes a?e as Conirad pef tonne!

foliows:

1) Admin 41raWe Comes Prwem. Maugemed and MATERIAL REOUEST PLANNING su;<;rvaory dehc.orces tnat a%d pv*.q,r3 p N p,y g n g~

$,', )

Osses A ND acDVOes (i e., poor p' ann"u be4,3, -an of laa o ad i e r redest date the sate as t" e

o e'

equate management er t.;pewry enrX mmret to tho tota' nn bet cf URs procedsres, etc )

2) Lcensed Operator Error Ihs ca.ne code ca:ws MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE errors of omesonrom"rts on b, icented re3ay epe,a.

T he tota',manm"m amo"'",.t,aMon recehed by aa v

tors dsong p: ant astu

3) Cther Personnel Error. E rror; ci cms one mt.

[g $n~r; [

N WMb d

s on commmed by noncenwd pmt,w ma g g O

i, e Prwem.1% m,# c' 1% ca,.t e O TA E

*'3%e WD'k Orders that have t

Mr b I y ; y to programma' C 00f G00 P', m

! een EP'h ed M' m-; 4 - n m p+ ca cie 15 [lef ueq

~

the ma ntenance f;nctcng o,,,n g.'. -,,

N M M mady to wME Ma'ts cluded in this cate9Bry are ma ntenave ten.'n# s u, sta n,3, p 3nn,* g"g PP

A lance, catbraton and rad abon proldon-idr ior b(.!d use) A:so inasded is the numhet of e ) pdesigngonstruct,on'lvtaDam Fabhcx on Prwem MWOs that have enm,eenng hoids (EeNs Prot.edures s

v Th$ caute code covers a f e^ f aage cf p<ogrammahc and other meeganeous eng neering holds), pa'ts hold A

ei parts not yet arnved) 1on d f br a

( e. Oss o coNrol power dse to and p!anning hold gob scope not yet comteted ti uncerrated fsse, equ'pment not osalf ed for the ennron.

tenance Work Requests (MWRs) are aSthewn that ment, etc.).

have been ident6ed for the Cyc's 15 Refunng Ostage

6) Equ,pment Fahres (Electron.c Piece Paqs or Eng and have not yet been convened to M NOs ronmentaLRelated F9ures)- This coce is uted for tpsn-aus f ailures of electromc p,ece-parts and fadures due to NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS motocrological condd ons such as I ghtning ce, hgs The number of ra$ological het spots which have been winds, etc. Generapy, it includes spunous or one timo idem fied and documented to cost at FCS at the end of f adures. E!ectric components inc!vded in th4s category tne reportmg month. A hot spot is a smalllocaueo are circu1 cards, rectfiers, b-stables, f sse". capac: tors, soura of rad,ahon A hot spot occurs when the Contact dodes, resistors, etc.

dose rate of an item is at leL 5 times the Genera Area cose rate and the tiem's dose rate is equal to or greater LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE DEING DISCHARGED than 100 rrRem' hour TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the total number of cunes from all NUMBER OF NPRDS MULTIPLE FAILURES I, quid releases from FCS to the M ssoun Raer.

The number of NPRDS reportabte f adsres over the pre-ced>ng eighteen months sorted by component manu'ac.

LOGG ADLE REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) turer and model number T hr' total number of security incidents f or the repo19g month depicted in two graphs. This ind cator tracks se.

NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM currty performance for SEP 858 INSTRUMENTS A contro! room mstrument that cannot peHorm es design MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS f uncton is conside'ed as out-obseroce A control room The number of Nsdear Piant ReLabd ty Data Sy stem mstrument wh,ch has had a Ma.nterace Wmk O der (NPRDS) components w,th more than 1 f a iste and the (MWO) wrmen for it and has not bcan repaaed by the number of NPRDS components Wdh more than 2 f adsres end of the report:ng perod is consm red out of !.erece for the last e ghteen months and wm be coumed The durabon ci the out-of service condmon is not consicercd Computer CRTs are not MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN consicered as comrol room mstruments.

Th:s indicator is a broaAccan of correctwo non outage mainte*,nce work o'ders by severat categones tnat re.

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN ma m t.,

nt t5e end of the repyt ng month T rus md..

LERS ator tr: as masmenance peHarmance for SEP #3E Tre number o' Liceasee Event Reports (LERs) annbuted to personnei error ca the oog u LER norMtal Th:s macator t* ends pe enel pe tormance for SEP r15.

89

PERFORMAtJCE ltJD!CATOR DEFitJITIOtJS (Cont'd)

NUMBER OF M!SSED SURVEILLAtJCE TESTS RE.

OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTIOri SULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS REPORTS The number of Survemance Tests (STs) that resutt in The number of ontdse CorrecNe Action Repo ts L consee Event Reports (L ER3) dunn; the reporbng (CARS) and the number cf CARS whch recewed exten-rnonth. This indcator tracxs mrssed STs for SEP c50 &

sons broken down by organ.:at;n for the last 6 rnonths 61.

PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTE-00 ERAT 10NS Af1D MAltJTENANCE BUDGET NANCE ACTIVITIES The year to-date budge compared to the act ai expen.

The % of the number cf comp'eted ma ntenante act &

drtures f or Operabens and fAa.ntenance depa'*,~ ents.

t es as compared to the n,mber of schedded ma:nte-nance activmes each week This % is shown for ea:,n OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS ma ntenance cratt. Ma:ntenan:e ammes incUde MWRs.

This indicator disp!ays the tota: number of outstand ng MNOs, STs, FMDs, ca brabons, and other misceFa-Corre-tive Act on Repo ts (CARS), the number cf CARS tecus aNmes. These inJcators t ax Ma:ntenance that are older than sia months enc tne neber of mods peHo mance for SEP #33 cabon related CARS.

PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The ra'e of tne number of tenovers to average uplop The number of Mod fcabon Recuests (MRs)in a y state ment A turnover is a vacancy created by soUntary res-between the issuance of a tA0d hcat=on Number and the ignabon f rom the company. Rehtement, deatn. termina-comp! ebon of the dramng upaa'e ten, transfers wnn tne company, and pa t t.r-e employ.

1) Form FC-1133 BacMog h Progress Tnts number rep.

ees are net cons: cered in tumover, resents modifcabon requetts that have r:ot Deen p' ant approved dunng the # mng montn.

PLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR

2) Modificahon Requ Be ng Renewed Th:s categ:ry The rabo of the L anned energy losses dunng c given ine:vdes:

penod of hme, to the reference energy generabon (the A ) Modifcaton Requetts that are not yet rev ewed energy that could be produced f the unit were operated B ) Modifcabon Reauests bemg renewed by the Nuclear cont.nuous'y at full power under reference amb.ent con-Projects Renew Commmee (NPRC).

dmons), expressed as a percentage C.) Mod fcation Requests being renewed by the Nxiear Projects Commmee (NPC)

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE These Modihcaton Requests may be reviewed severa:

This indicator is dehned as the % of prevenhve ma:nte-times before they are approved for accomphshment or nance stems in the month that were not comp:eted by the cancelled. Some of these Maecaton Reauests are scheduled date plus a grace penod equal to 25 *a of the returned to Engineering for more informabon. Some ap-scheduled interval. This indicator tracks preventive proved for evaluanon, some approved for study, and ma:ntenaace act: vibes for SEP #41.

some approved for planning Once planning is com-ploted and the scope of the work is clearly dehned, these PROGRESS OF CYCLE 15 OUTAGE MODIFICATION Modifcat on Requests may be approved _for accomphsh-PLANNING ment with a year assigned for constructen or they may This indicator shows the status of modificabons ap-be canceted All of these different phases require re.

proved for complebon during Ine Cycle 15 Refuebng Out-view.

age.

3) Dasign Engmeenng Backlog 1n Progress Nuclear Planning has assigned a year in whch construebon wdl PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY '. OF HOURS OUT be completed and design work may be in progress OF LIMIT

4) Construct on Backlog'In Progress. The Construebon Tne % of hours out of hmn are for six primary chemistry Package has been issued or construct.on has begun but parameters divided by the tota! number of hours poss:bie the mod,hcaton has not been accepted by the System for the month. The key parameters used are: trthium.

Acceptance Commtee (SAC).

Chionde Hydrogen. Dissolved Oxygen, Fluonde, and

5) Design Engineenng Update BacMog1n Prog ess PED Suspended Sohds EPRI hm ts are used has received the Mod,ficatch Compietron Report but the drawings have not been updated.

PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS The above ment,oned outstanding mod.hcatant do not (MAINTENANCE) include mod;hcatons which are proposed for canceDa-The numbe' cf identibed incedents concern:ng ma,nte-

tion, nance procedurat problems, th) number of closed irs related to the use et procedures (includes the number of OVERALL PROJECT STATUS closed irs caused by procedural noncomphance), and This indicator shows the status of the pro;ects wheh a e the number of closed proce:ura! noncomphance irs.

in the scope of the Cycle 15 ReLehng Outage Th:s indcator trends personne! pedormance for SEP

15,41 & 44 90

l PERFORf.1AtJCE ItJDICATOR DEFitJITIOfJS (Cont'd)

RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGR AfA I

lhe number of dentif,ed poor rad'o!og cal aork p*act.ces where an unswured door is caused by a e vem aro (PRWP) for the reporting month T his ina,cato' trads neladed in tms categor, un:ess thee is an incicahon that radiological work periormance for SEP #52 an acgtiment was made to tte door Tfus indcator traas SKur,ty performance for SEP #[0 RATIO OF PREVEf 4TIVE TO TOTAL mal!JTEf1Af1CE The rate of preventse matntenance hneiscrg sur.e A r 7URITY SYSTEfA FAILURES tance testing and catbraton procedures) to tw sum of

' ne f ahow ng componeres are int typer, of loggabte 'r e-non-outago corrective ma nter.ance and p event,e r a n-podab:u SECURITY SYSTEfA F AILURES represerted n tenance comp 6tod over the reponmg penod The raSo.

Nsine cator hcicents in tts category nelude atarm espressed as a percentage, it cah:J:ated batec on man-sgtem f a lares. CCTV f a Gret. tecciny computer taJ hours This ind:cator tracks present4e ma nienance a:

ures, tearch eau,pmerc f aJures and door hardware f a5 tet'es for SEP 841 ures These system f a :ures are further categanted as f Qo ns RECORDADLE If4 JURY.1LLf 4ESS CASES FRE-1; Alarm Sptem Faure - Detecton sptem events in.

QUEf4CY RATE vowg f eso nu sam e alarms and mechan. cal ta tures The number of injunes reau,nng more than no*ma! Ott 2; /earm Sgtem Fngaons Deg adat1ons to de'ecton aid per 200,000 man hours worked 1 his ind cator syvern portowante at a resut o' e vaonmentai r.ondr trends personnel periormeco for SEP a15. 25 & 20 t ons g 4,ta n < o w,fa st)

3) CCT V F a v es

f. khan,ca! f adures to au CCTV tard.

SECOf 4DARY SYSTEM CHEfAISTRY PERFORMAf1CE wa e com;,ownts If1DEX O CCTV Envaans Degradatons to CCTV periormanc e lho Chemistry Perf arn ance inden (cpl; e, a cakucn as a resut c' env.ronmentat condmons O e, ra n, snow, based on the contentraton of key wpunoes in the se:

frott, f og sunspots, thade) ondary side of the plant. T hese key impant=es am the

5) Secunty Computer Fadures Falute of the mutte most IAely cauto of detenoraton of t% steam Genera-p!eser, central pro:essing un4t. and other compu'er barc.

tors. The cherrustry parameters are repo*ted or!y for the ware and sc'inare This category does not include soft.

period of time greator than 30 percent poAer.

wato problems caused by cporator error in using the lho CPlis calculated using the foWowing equaton CPI.

software (KC0 0) + (f Ja?O) + (0/10)) / 3 where the f oNowing are 4 Sea *ch Equipment f ailures. Fadures of x ray, rnetal monthly averges of; Ka. averago blowdown caton or orploswo detectars and other equipment used to conductivity, fJa average blowdown sodium concen.

tearch for contracand This atto includes incidents trabon, O,. average condensato purrp discha go d s-where the sea'ch eqv pment :s found to be defectivo or 1,olved crygen concentrat on.

did not f unct on properly dunng teshng

7) Door Hardware Failures Failure of the door alarm SECURITY flOf4-SYSTEM FAILURES and other door hard6are such as latches, electnc Linkes, The following components are the types of loggable're-doorknobs. locks. etc portable r,an-system f a' lures represented in this and ca-

8) 1991 versus 1992 System Fadures Statshcs from tor. Inc>ts in this category include secunty badges.

1991 wd be compared on a monthly basis wch 1992 access conc J and authontation, secunty force error, loggabWreportable system f adures This indicator tracks and unsecurud doors securdy performance for SEP s5B

1) Secunty Badges - Incidents assoc,ated w;th improper use and handling of securtty badges incidents include SPARE PARTS IfJVEf1 TORY VALUE securny badges that are bst, taken out of the protected The dol:ar value of the spare parts inventory for FCS dar-area, out of control on sde, or inadvenently destroyed or ing the reporting pef od.

broken.

2) Access Control and Authontaton Admin,strative and SPARE PARTS ISSUED procedural errors associated with the uw of the card-lho do!!ar vatus of thu spare parts istued for FCS dunng access system such as tailgabng, incorrect securcy the reporting penod badge issued, and improper escon procedu'es. Th,s also includes incidents that were caused by inco"ect STAFFING LEVEL access authontauon informat on entered into the security The actual statt:ng level and the authonted sta'hng level system computer.

for the fJuctear Operatons Diveion. the Producten Engh

3) Secunty Force Error Evnts caused by members of neering Dwison, and the fJaclear Services Divison Th:s the securay force that are found to be inanentLe to ther indicator tracks performance for SEP #24 dJties of Who nogloCiod to properly pGrform assgned functons (e g, required search proce ~ o or patro!).

STATIOf1 f1ET GEf1ER ATIOf 4

4) Unsecured Doors - Doors which a and to be unsc-The not generaton (sum) proauced by the FCS donn; cured with no compensatory otheer posted or where the the reponmg montn indrydual Caustng the alarm dd not remain at thO a' armed door unbl a securfy othCer responded Eients 91

PERFORfA AtJCE li4DICATOR DEFil41TIO!JS (Cont'd)

STOCKOUT RATE UfJIT CAPABILITY FACTOR The total number of Pck Tickets that were generated Tr ~ rato of the avadabW energy generaten over a given dunng the reporting month and the total nurnber of Pck time pened to the reference energy generaton (the en-Tickets that were generated during the repoitng month ergy that could be produced if the unit were operated when the amount of parts toquested is equal to or less continuously at full power under reference ambient con.

than the minimum stocking level and parts af e not avaa ditions) over the same time petod. empressed as a per-able.

centage.

TEfAPORARY fAODIFICAT10NS UNPLANf4ED AUTOfAATIC REACTOR SCRAfAS The number of tert'porary rnochanical and electocal con.

WHILF CRITICAL bgurations to the plant's systems.

T h s indicator is dehned as the number of unplanned au-

1) Temporary conhguratons are dehned as c'ecincal toma'c scrams (reactor protecten system logic actua.

jumpers, electocal blocks, mechamcal jumpers, or me.

1 ons) that occur per 7.000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months of entcal operaton.

chancal blocks which are Instated in the plant operahng The valve for this ind Cator is calculated by multiplying systems and are not r,hown on the latest revison of the the total number of unptantsed autom%c rsactor scrams PalD, schematc, connecton, wiring, or teow d,agrams.

in a specac time pered by 7,000 hous,inen dividing

2) Jumper 5 and blccks which are insta!4d for Surveib that number by the total number of hours ciitical in the lance Tests, fAsintenance Procedures, CaLbraten Pro.

Same time penod The indicator is f urther dehned as cedures, Special Procedures, or Operating Procedures follows:

are not considered as temporary mod.f catons unless the 1) Unplanned means that the tcram was not an antici-jumper or block remains in place af ter the *est or proce.

pated part of a p!anned test.

dure is complete. Jumpers and blocks insta!4d in test or

2) Scram means the automate shutdown of the reactor lab instruments are not considered as temporary mod 6-by a rapid inserton of negative reactivity (e g., by control

catons, rods, liquid injecton system, etc.) that is caused by ac-

3) Scattolding is not considered a temporary mod hea.

taaton of the reactor protecton system. The scram sig-ton. Jumpers and blocks whch aie installed and for nal may have resu!!ed from exceedmg a setpomt or may which lARs have been submitted will be considered as have been sputous, temporary modificatons untit final resoluton of the MR

3) Automat c means that the Imtlal signal that caused and the jumper or block is removed or is permanently actuation of the reactor protecton system logic i ras pro-recorded on the drawings. This indicator tracks tempo-vided from one of the sensors monitoring plant param-rary modifcations for SEP aC2 & 71, eters and condaions, rather than the manual scram swaches or,in manuat turbine Inp switches (or push but.

THERfAAL PERFORfAANCE tons) provided in the main control room.

The rato of the design gross heat rate (corrected) to the 4),ritcal means that during the steady state condition of adjusted actual gross heat rate, espressed as a percent-the reactor pror to the scram, the e?fective multiphcation age.

f actor (k,,) was essentially equal to one.

TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAtuttJG UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR The total number of student hours of train ng for Opera-The rato of the unplantad energy losses during a given tions, fAaintenance, Chemistry /Radiaton Protecton, porod of time, to the refefence energy generation (the Technical Support, General Employee Tra:mng, and energy that could be produced if the umt were operated Other Traming conducted for FCS.

continuously at full power under reference ambient con-drtions) over the same time period, expressed as a per-TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS contage.

The total number and department breakdown of training instruction hours administered by the Training Center.

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS.

(LNPO DEFINITION)

TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAfAINATIONS This indicator is defined as the sum of the following Reportable skin and clothing contarainatens above safety system actuat ons:-

background

veis greater than 5000 dpm/100 cm

1) The number of unplanned Emergency Core Cochng squared This indicator trends personnel periormance System (ECCS) actuatens that resutt from reaching an for SEP #15 & 54.

ECCS actuation setpoint or f rom a spunousfinadvertent -

ECCS signal,

2) Tne number of unplanned emergency AC power sys-tem actuatons that ret utt f rom a loss of power to a safe-92

1 PERFORM AIJCE ltJDlCATOR DEFlfJITIOllS (cont'd) guards bus. An unpla,f i safe.,ystem actuaton oc-cuts when an actuaton setront ior a sa'ety system is reached or when a spurious of inadvertent sgnalit, gen-ersted (ECCS only), and major eqvpment n the toystem as actuated. Unplanned rupans that the tyttom a tuaten was not part of a planned lett of ecc@ ton. The CCCS actuatons to be counted are actuatons c' the hgh pres-sure injecton $ystem, ths low pretsure injecich system, or the tafety injecten tanks

,UtiPLAlifiED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIOfJS(ilRC DErlfllTIOld) i The number of safety system ractuatons which melude (2n!y) the High Pressurp Saf :ty injecton Syttem the t

s Low Pressure Safety th;ecton System, the Safety ltijec-100 lonks, and the Emergerry Diesel Generators The f 4RC classsicaton of safety system actuations includes actuatons when rnajor equipment ts operated g*;g when the logic systems for the above safety syuems are chah longed.

VIOL ATIOtJS PER 1,000 if4SPECTIO!1 HOURS This indicator n dehned as the number of violations sited in tJAC inspecton reports for FCS per 1.000 tJAC in-specton hours. The violatons are reported in the year that the inspecion was actua!!y performed and not based on when the inspection report is received. The hours repotted for each inspection report are used as the in-specton hours.

VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE This indicator is defined as the volume of low level sohd radioactive waste actually shipped for bunal. Thrs ind:ca.

tot also shows the volume of low level radcactive waste which is in tamporary t,torage, the amount of radofictive o6l that has been shipped off sttu tor processing, and the volume of sohd dry radcactive waste which has been shipped off tite for processing. Low level sohd radioac-tive wasic consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance. Dry radcactive waste includes contaminated tags, cleaning materials,

+

dispos,able protoctive clothing, plastic conta ners, and any other materiallo be deposed of et a low level rad o-active waste drspor,al site, except resin, sludge, of evaporator bottoms, low level refers to all radcactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product of spent tuel processing. This indicator tracks radclogical work per-formance for SEP #54.

93

dar t i i tidt%I Atlatidl Ph0GRAIA If 4DL A The purpose of tne Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Pedormance indcators index is to ist penor-mance indcators related to SE P stems vath parameters tha; can be trended SSf_[12121 cme Numb 21.$

Paoe lucrease HPES and IR Ac;ountabaty Througn Use of Periormance Indcators Procedural Norcompliance incidents (t/ aintenance).

33 Total Skin and Clothing Contam. nations.

.50 Recordable injury /l!! ness Cates f requency Rate.

. 09 Number of Personnel Errors Reponed in LERS -

70 CARS issued vs Sign.fcant C Ans issued vs NRC Violabons issued vs LERs Reported.

82 STP R'it1252_lblnk';L22 Qual:ty Aud.ts and Surveillance Prog'ams are Evaluated. Improved in Depth and Strengthened C APS Issued vs Signitcant Cans tssued vt NRC Viotations Ittued vs LERs Reported 02 L[P Pc12 2E2.DWDUCL21 Develop and Conduct Saf ety System f unctional Inspections CARS issued vs Signifcant C ARL lutued vs NRC Vio!;. bons issued vs LE Rs Reported 82 SEE1121212C2_Ihmb2 lid Complete Staff Stud es Staffing ievel

.72 SSP.lld2LCEduider 25 Training Program tor Managers and Supervisors implemented Disabling injury / Illness f requency Rate

.18 Recordable injury / Illness Cases f requency Hate.

.09 SEP Reference Number 20 Evaluate and implement Stahon Standards ior Safe work Practice Requirements Disabling Injury! Illness frequency Rate.

,1B Recordable injurylltiness Cases Frequency Rate.

09 S[P RefC1fE2.IbfDbCL21 Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWO Planning Status.

. 83 Overall Project Status

.B4 Progress of Cycle 15 Outage Modification Planning.

.05 SEP Rd212E2.Nu1MSL22 Develop On.Line Maintenance and Moditcation Schedute Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Electncal Maintenance).

.34 (Pressure Equipment)

. 35 (General Maintenance).

30 (Mechanical Maintenance).

~37 (Instrumentation & Control),

38 SEP Rettrence thfnb2L2S Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Dreakdown (Corrective Non Outage Maintenance).

27 Corrective Maintenance Backlog Greater than 3 Months Old (Non Outage).

28 SEP Refereme Number 41 Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedute Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance.

29 Preventive Maintenance items Overdue.

30 Procedural Noncomp!;ance incidents.

33 t

94

SEP Ref e'ence Uumber 42 Implement the Check Valve 'iest Program Check Valve Failure Rate.

.43 SEP Def erence Number 44 Compliance With and Use of Procedures Procedural Noncomphance incidents (Maintenance).

33 SEP Deference Number 46 Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program Document Review -

22 SEP Re'erence Number 52 Estabbsh Supervisory Accountabibty for Worters Radologeal Practces Radiological Work Practices Program.

.52 SEP Reference Numbdj Complete implementation el Radiologeal Enhancement Program Collective Radiation Exposure (Cumulative).

.16 Volume of Low-Level Sohd Radioactive Waste.

17 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations.

._50 Decontaminated Radiation Centremed Area,

,51 SEP Rektence Number SS F'evise Physical Security Tra:ning and Procedure Program Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security).

. 56 Secunty Non System Failures.

. 57 Secunty System Failures

,58 SEP Reference Number CO Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulung in Licensee Event Reports.

.39 SEP Ref erence Number 61 Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports.

. 39 SEP Ref erenmHumbeLE2 Establish intenm System Engineers Temporary Modifications..

. 0:i Engineenng Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown.

.66 Engineering Change Notice Status.

. 67 Engineering Change Notice Breakdown.

. 68 SEP Reference Number CB Assess Rool Cause of Poor Operator Training and Estabhsh Means to Monitor Operator Training Licensed Operator Requahhcation Training.

.73 License Candidate Exams.

. 74 SEP Ref erence Number 71 Improve Controls over Temptrary Mo$fications Temporary Modifications.

. 65 95

REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST R. L Andrews D.C Gorence M. W. Nchols G= L Anglehart R E Gray C. W. Norns W. R Bateman M J.Gumn Nuclear Licensing K. L Delek G E. Guhani

& Industry Affairs A D. Bilau K. B Guliani J. T. O'Connor T. G Blair E. R. Gundal W. W. Orr B. H. Biome R. H. Guy L. L. Parent C. N Dloyd R. M. Hawkins T. L. Patterson J.P.Dobba M. C. Hendnckson R T. Pearce C. E. Doughter R R Henning R. L Phe!ps M. A. Breuer K. R Henry W.J Ponec C. J. Brunner1 J B Herman L. lA. Pulverenti M W. Butt G. J Hill T. M. Retsdortf r1 A. Carlson K C Holthaus A W R. chard J. W. Chase L G Huh:La D. G. Ried G. R. Chatfield C.J Husk G. K Samide A G Chnstensen R L Jaworski T.J Sandene A. J. Clark R. A Johansen B. A. Schmidt O. J. Clayton W C. Jones S. T. Schmitz R. P. Cicmens J. D. Kecy F C. Scofield J. L. Connolley J. D. Keppler H. J. Sef ck G. M. Cook D. D. Kloock J. W. Shannon L_

M. R. Core J. C. Knight R. W. Short S R. Cntes D. M. Kobunski C. F. Simmons D. W. Dale G. J. Krause E. L Skaggs R. C. DeMeulmeester L J. Krpal J. L. Skiles R.D.DeYoung J G. Krist F. K. Smith D. C. Dietz L.T.Kusek R. L Sorenson K.S. Dowdy L E. Labs J. A. Spilker J. A. Drahota M P. Lazar K. E. Steele T. R. Dukarski R. C. Learch W. Steele D. L. Eid R. E. Lewis H. F. Sterba R. G. Eurich R. C Liebentritt G A Teeple H. J. Faulhaber B. Lisowyj M. A. Tesar M. A. Ferdig B. R. Livingston T. G. Therkildsen F. F. Franco J. H. MacKinnon J. W. Tills M. T. Frans G. D Mamoran D. R. Trausch H K. Fraser J. W. Marcil P. R. Turner J. F. W. Fnedrichsen N. L Martice J. M. Uhland S. K. Gambhir D. J. Matthews C.F,Vanecek J. K. Gasper J M. Mattire J. M. Waszak W. G. Gates T. J Mcivor G. R. Wilhams M. O. Gautier K S. McCormick S. J. Willrett S. W. Gebers R. F. Mehaffey W. C. Woerner J. M. G!antz K. G. Melstad J. T. Gleason K. J. Morris L V. Goldberg D. C. Mueller D. J. Golden R. J Mueiler 96

ce r w as.

POSITIVE TREND REPORT

ADV, REPORT (Contnued)

The Posrt:ve Trend Repon hgn! ghts severa! Pedor-Cr*<e-* ve W m er E*:. M 0 erc Th'a ? 'Mr mance Indcators with data representmg cont nued pet.

Og gen.og formance above the stated goal and na,cators wan cata (Pa;e 20) representng signacant improvement in recent months Tt e percentage ci cpen correctre non-o tage mainte.

nance work orde's that a'e grerer than 3 months old The to:lomng md.cators have been se:eced as ert b t ng has mc' eased for three consec A.e raths.

pas,tive trends:

pyen rr.e Am t, nep+ ecr a ni s c-m iPage 40)

D2n'*09 NLM Tt.e total narrber c! cwponent ano apptcanon catep (Page 22) r.es t as increased for four consecutve montes Th.s There were no b enn.a1 document reviews o,e due for t'end is due to f adures f;und durmg the Cyc e 14 the month of Augs.t h addition, there were 323 docu-R( U ' ng Outage Tne f.gses have increased for the ment reviews ton pteted ouong the month.

last t'aec repoqmg m0nths because INPO reawres ap-Lopb'ernro7 pbie hMeet (sey.a (Page %)

g,y.m q ~ f, & c.s t c y,q r,e n e nn n,, e The number of loggable'reportabic mcidents ccncerneg (page (9; system la lures has cecreased from a tota' of 73 n Jans-ibe manager of the Sa'ety Depaqment has stated that ary 1992 to a tota! of 10 in Augatt.

an aberte trend is mdcated bated on a co panson cf in-s mdcators 1992 va!ses and the f.ve yea' ave' age vales End of Posite Trend Repo1.

Erc of Adve se Trend Repo1 ADVERSE TREND REPORT A Periormance indcator which has data representmg three (3) consecutu months of dechning peHormance constitutes an adverse trend. The Adverse Trend Repon explains the condibons under whch certain ndcators are INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED thowing adverse trends An explanahon wdi be provided MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT for indicators w;;h data representing three months of de-ekning portermance that have been labeled as adverse This section I.sts the indcators which show nadequacies U '"d' '

as compared to the OPPD goal and indicators which The following ind,cators are eihibiting adve*se trends for show inadequacies as compared to the industry upper the report.ng month:

ten percentae. The indcators will be compared to the industry upper ten percenth as relevant to that indicator.

DI.;21h12ne R3'e (Page 2)

Linotanned Au'0We ReMor Scea s rier 7 000 Hou's The forced ou' age rate has increased for four consecu-Cr *;,2 tive months (Page 3)

The number of unp:anned automat.c reactor scrams per Dj nbi naha y1%ett R ve 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months entica! year-to-date value for the reporting r

(Page 18) monn I7 08) exceecs the Foq Ca: noun 1992 goal of The manager of the Ga'ety Department has stated tha zero p) an adverse trend is ind.cated based on a companson or this indicator't,1992 values and the five year average f4 wenwe Won O de, Pres down rCorremive ten.

vafues Oc'rel (Page 27) brent Fgrxed Ouw n ye The number of to'al open corrective no -outage f.1WOs (Page 20) open at the <:nd of the reporting rnonth (370) exceeds the The equ.pment forced outage rate has increased for four Fo t Calhoun goalof a maomum cf 350 consecut.ve months.

97 m

INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT

-lMPROVEMENTS/ CHANGES (Continued)

This secton Osts tagmicant changes mad r to the report Rntic of Preyg1yrjo lotM lA.Weannte !thn Ortre) and to spec:!c ind.cators wrthin the report since the pre.

(Page 29) von month.

The f ato of p'eventive lo total maintenance for the re-norting month (551%)is kiwer than the fort Calhoun goal 0105%.

L'*3""ed 90'Ch' hite'" Ad_gt' oat - (tJRC Debna ca)

(Page 5) litcondFv Syttom Chem't!'y This indicator has been revised to include the July 23, (Page 44) 1992 inadverlent d esel generator r, tart.

T he Chemistry Periormance indes (cpl; value f or the repo' ting month (C 601) exceeds the f ort Cahoun goal UMW lho""M O AN!

of 0 45.

(Page 19)

The t.cre of the giaph for this indicator has to illustrate Prima'y Sygem Ch_emittry Pe cent ei Houn 0;t of tem +

pe'iormance relabve to the fort Ca1houn goat of 1495 (Page 45) lA N.

Thn pnmary r,yttom chemistry percent of hours est of kmrt for the reporting month (2.13%) enceeds the fort th"?P"3"& WC"k O'de' P'eak down (Co"eove tbn-Calhoun goal of a maximum of 2%

QVlut)

(Page 27) h LJne Chem't.tev ine' amen *e Out-of Se'v!ce This indicator has been revised to include informaton (Page 47) formerly presenled in the Ma>ntenance Work Order Back-Tho number of irdhna chemittry instruments out<3f set, log indcator. The lAnintenance Work Order Hacklog in<

vice for the repomng month (23) exceeds the i ort Cal-dcator was deleted f rom the report houn goalof a manimum of G.

Comoonent f Mu'e Annives Reoort (CF Ath Summarv lhtimum indmdual Rad at'on Ernot u'e (Page 40)

(Page 49)

This indicator has been revised to identif y the figures The maximum individual radiation exposure for the year presented as component CatcQones With signif 6cantly at the end of the repomng month (1,74D mrem) exceeds higher f ailure rates than the industry, in past reports the fort Calhoun goal of 1,500 mRom.

these figures were identif ed as

tems wtth high f ailure rates *.

Total SHn and Ciothinn Contaminfons (Pago 50) llan'dous Watte lhe cumulativo skin and clothing contaminations at the (Pago 48) end of the reporting rnonth (253) entoods the f ort Cal.

The graph has been rmsed to include a yearly total for boun goal of 144.

hazardous waste.

Ogcgntaminated Radeon Cont'otled Arts (Page 51)

The percentage of the RCA that is ducontaminated for End of Periortnanco Indicator Report improvements /

the reporting month (87.2%)is less than the Fort Cat.

Changes Report boun goal of 80%,

Vdations ner 1.000 htocetion Hoyn (Pago 77)

The number of fJRC volations per 1.000 inspection hours value for (no reporting month (2.70) exceeds the Fort Calhoun goaf of a maximum of 1.5.

End of Management Attention Report o

98 l

FOIi1 CALHOUN ST ATIOld OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES Event Date Range Production (MWH)

Cumulative (MWH) j Cycle 1 09/26,73 02,'01/75 3,299,639 3,299,639 3

1st Refueling 02/01/75 05 0975 Cycle 2 05'09/75 10.01/76 3,853,322 7.152,961 2nd Refueling 10 01/76 12/1376 Cycle 3 12/1376 9/3077 2,805,927 9,958,888 3rd Refueling 09/30 77 12/0977 Cycle 4 12/09/77 10'14 78 3,026,832 12,985,720 4th Refueling 10/1478 12/2478 Cycle 5 12/2478 01/18'80 3,882,734 16,868,454 51h Refueling 01/18'80 06'11/80 Cycle 6 06/11/80 09/18'01 3,899,714 20,768,168 6th Refueling 09/18'81 12/21/81 Cycle 7 12/21/81 12/06'82 3,561,866 24,330,034 7th Refueling 12/00'82 04'07/83 Cycle 0 04'07/83 03'03:84 3,406,371 27,736,405 8th Refueling 03'03'84 07/12/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 09/28'85 4,741,488 32,477,893 9th Refuelitig 09/28/85 01/16/86 Cycle 10 01/16'86 03'07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 10th Refueling 03/07/87 06:08'87 Cycle 11 06 % '87 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 lith Refueling 09/27/88 01/31/89 Cycle 12 01/31/89 02/17!90 3,817,954 45,589,459 12th Refueling 02/17/90 05/29'90 Cycle 13 05/29/90 02/01/92 5,451,069 51,040,528 13th Refueling 02/01/92 05/03/92 Cycle 14#

05'03/92 09/18'93 (Planned Dates) 14th Refueling 09/18!93 11/13'93 Cycle 15 11/13'93 03/11/95 15th Refueling 03!11/95 05'06'95 FORT CALHOUN STATION CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS " RECORDS" First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47 p.m.)

First Electricity Supplied to the Syste.

August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH)

September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%)

May 4,1974 Longest Run (477 days)

June 8,1987 Sept. 27,1988 Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,4:28,800 KWH)

October 1987 Most Productive Fuel Cycle (5,451,069 MWH)(Cycle 13)

May 29,1990 Feb.1.1992

_mm

ML20118B836

Text

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search