ML20117H757

Responds to Question Arising in 850501 Prehearing Conference as to Whether Intervenor Previously Called Attention to Generic Finding Incorrectly Labeld 3.1(j). Pages 39 & 40 of Intervenor 811121 Pleading Cited

ML20117H757
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	05/03/1985
From:	Sinkin L Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power, INC.
To:	Bechhoefer C, Eva Hill, John Lamb Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20117H761	List: ML20117H757 ML20117H777
References
CON-#285-977 OL, NUDOCS 8505140403
Download: ML20117H757 (1)

Text

. _ .

.; 0)$

P Friday, May 3, 1985-Charles Bechhoefer, Esquire 00LnETEC Chairman . USNRC Atomic Safety and' Licensing Board

.U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 15 MY-8 40:24 Dr. James C. Lamb, III Ernest E. Hill CFFicEgy;; tat 74

-Administrative Judge 0 Hill Associates 0CMErlNG & SE9v$l' 313 Woodhaven Road 210 Montego Drive 3 RANCH Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 Danville, CA 94526 Re: _ South Texas Nuclear Project, Decket Nos. 50-498, 50-499(>L

Dear Members of the Board,

At -the prehearing-conference on May 1, 1985, a question arose regarding t.m generic findings both labelled 3.1(j) in the Quadrex Report. CCANP had called attention to the fact that two findings were so labelled and that the Board's February 26 Order had carried forward the typographical error.

The Applicants questioned whether CCANP had in fact originally raised this finding in its November 21, 1981 filing, the basis for the listing in the Board's February 26 Jrder.

CCANP ' directs the Board's attention to peces 39 and 40 of said pleading. At page 39, the following appears:

L) . An " abnormally high error rate was observed in Brown and Root calculations for the nuclear, as opposed- to the conventional, aspects of the engineering work."

-(Section 3.1(j) [ sic], p. 3-11) (emphasis added)

Obviously the "Esic]" was to direct the Board's attention to the typograp'hi cal error and the finding itself is in "1".

At page 40, the following appears:

D. There were no documented standards regarding the minimum qualifications required for a design verifier."

(Secti on 3.1 (j ) , p. 3-13 CCANP is at this point identifying the finding which in fact should carry the "j" designation.

Sincerely, tu Lanny inkin 85g51

$ 85050g98 3022 Porter St, NW tt304 0 0500hDR _

Washington, D.C. 20008 (202) 966-2141

-c.c. ' Service List