ML20117G800

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Criteria for Determining Justification for Continued Operation When Encountering Major Discrepancies in As-Built Safety Related Piping
ML20117G800
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/28/1996
From:
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20117G782 List:
References
DG-M10, NUDOCS 9609050337
Download: ML20117G800 (5)


Text

i WISCONSIN ELECTRIC DG-M10

, NUCLEAR POWER DEPARTMENT Revision 1 DESIGN AND INSTALLATION GUIDELINES Pace 4 of 9 Accendix 8 PIPE SUPPORT GUIDELINES #A

t. ..,

. CRITERIA TOR DETERMINING JUSTITICATION.,

l l

FOR CONTINUED OPERATION WHEN ENCOUNTERING f

MAJOR DISCREPANCIES IN *AS-BUILT" SAJETY RELATED PIPING )

l l

l I

WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POhT.R COMPANY Point Beach Nuclear Plant 9609050337 960828 DR ADOCK 05000266 PDR l

1 . .

WlSCONSIN ELECTRIC DG-M10 NUCLEAR POWER DEPARTMENT Revision 1

. . DESIGN AND INSTALLATION GUIDELINES Pace 5 of 9 PlPE SUPPORT GUIDELINES ll ll l

?

TAstr er cos Es:s s

Pace 3

1.o :N:Rosucrzes a scort . . . . . . . . . .... ...

3 2.0 CRITERIA . . . . . .................

5 3.0 c0N"Lus!C:3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . .

5 4.0 FITERENCIs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2-

.'.)

3 l -

l l

. . 1

. WISCONSIN ELECTRIC DG-MS O

. NUCLEAR POWER DEPARTMENT Brision 1 DESIGN AND INSTALLATION GUIDELINES Pace 6 of 9 Accendix B PIPE SUPPORT GUIDELINES f.:

.1. 0 INTP03UCT:CN & SCCPE These. criteria are intended to assure the operabil-ity require- -

ments of safety related piping and associated supports af at as

' determined that stresses exceed allowables presented in the PoAnt Beaca Nu: lear Plant TSAR. These crateria permit cperation for an interim period only. Modifications will be made wnach return the system to within TSAR allowables by the next refueling outage or sooner if operation permits.

These criteria are intended to expeditiously perform necessary evaluations to determine interim operability and not to delay appropriate actions.

For cases involving components classified as ASH code class I where TSAA allowables are exceeded, WE shall be notified upon dascovery and WE shall evaluate reportability requirements per 10CTR50.

! 2.0 CRITERIA 2.1 Paping Operability Criteria w

The piping enalysis shall be in accordance with AS..E.

Sectier. Ill NC-J600 servace level D limits (Pef. 1). The

- des:;n leading conditions to be applied in the analysis 4

shall include the CBE earthquake.

4 To11owing is the pipe stress criteria for gustifying

, contanued operation of the plant:

(Fef. I equation 9)

(5 7+S.+SD3E g < 2.0 Sy)

Where: S gp = Longitudinal Pressure Stress S g7 = Dead Weight Stress Stresses Resulting Tzom Design Basis 4

Sogg

5 I

= Material Yield Stress (Reference 1 Appendices) code Case N-411 allows for increated damping values.

independent of pipe diameter, for seismic analysis.

Therefore, increased damping values, in accordance with reference 2, will be acceptable when performing these analyses to meet operability. Should the piping stress analysis exceed the value of 2.0 Sy, or pipe supports do

] not meet their operable limits (see Section 2.2. then ,

additional iterative analysis of the piping may es required. The iterative analysis may use the knowledge

' that a support is not capable of withstanding the leads, and can be removed from the analysis. Where feasible, the actual suppert stiffness may be included in the iterative analysis, along with other refinements.

. J-l

WISCONSIN ELECTRIC DG-M10 NUCLEAR POWER DEPARTMENT Revision 1

, DESIGN AND INSTALLATION GUIDELINES Pace 7 of 9 Accendix B PlPE SUPPORT GUIDELINES Tor cases where piping secondary stresses are determined to l

exceed TS AR allowable s, a specific case by case approm=h

~

Vill be used to determine interi,m operability.

2.2 Pape Support & Hanger operability Criteria As a first step in evaluating the suppert, a linear elastic f analysis method will be used to determine the stress an the '

support members. In addition to the loading in Section include pipe thermal leads and i 2.1, the support loads must results from free end displacement and an= hor motion.

Supports will be analyzed using the allowables listed below

. to meet operability requirements.

Structural Steel I

Tg = 1.20 Sy but Tension

< 0.70 Su Bending T = 1.20 Sy but b

0.70 Su Shear Ty = 0.72 Sy but

< 0.42 Su

- Compression T, < T gbut not to exceed l 2/3 Per I

Cembined Stress Tor axial compression and bending i er axial tensson and bending, use I!SC 1.6., (Ref. 6)

Web Crippling = 1.0 Sy Weld Stress Ty = 0.42 Su (cf weld material)

Anchor Bolts Use Ta ter of Safety of 2 against ultimate tension and ahear values I l

Snubbers l l

Hydraulics Lead < manufacturers one time load l capacity. l Movement < total travel Springs Load within catalog range withe 9:

bottoming out 5: ruts TS = 2 and < 2/3 Per 14

WISCONSIN ELECTRIC DG.M10 NUCLEAR POWER DEPARTMENT Revision 1

'OESIGN AND INSTALLATION GUIDELINES Pace 8 of 9 Accendix B PIPE SUPPORT GUIDELINES r"a s .. - -

All remaining use manufacturers published faulted ,

Catalog Items load rating. Where level D allow-

  • ables are not given, and the factor . .

of safety is specified in the catalog, use design allowables but with T5 = 2. (Typical catalog TS = 5, therefore use 2.5 x catalog capacity.

' Where: Tg = Allowable Tensile stress r = Allowable Bending Stress b

Ty = Allevable Shear Stress

= Allowable Axial compressive stress T, )

)

Ty = Allowable Weld Stress J

Per = Maximum Strength of Axially Loafed ,

Coepression Member l at Sy = 5pecified Minimum Yield Strength Temperature (See Note 1)

Su = 5pecified Minimum Tensile Terength Temperature TS = Tactor of Safety Note is Actual yield strength may be used where CMTR's 4

are avaalable for the material.

If a support fails using the linear elastic method, then a more refined analysis may be performed using plastae analysis techniques. The plastic analysis will(Fef. follow the 1) design rules of ASME Section III, Appendix T.

i 3.0 CCNCLUSION If the above criteria cannot be met, reportability per ICCTR53 must be evaluated and system operability reqairements per Plant Technical Specifications must be evaluated and appropriate actions taken. l 1

4.0 PETERENCES

1. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boiler and Pressure vessel Codes,Section III, 1983 Edation, through Winter 1985 Addenda.
2. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boiler and Pressure vessel Codes, Case N-411, Cated 9/17/54.

l WISCONSIN ELECTRIC DG-M10 Revision 1 NUCLEAR POWER DEPARTMENT DESIGN AND INSTALLATION GUIDELINES Pace 9 of 9 PIPE SUPPORT GUIDELINES

_ .mmmmmme.

), H80 !E B.13etan 79 02. 'F4pe Swppert Base Paste De'. ages I Usang Concrete Espansion Ancher Solts, Peva s s en t o. 2 18.;plement No. 11. Dated 8/20/79.

4. USAS 831.1.0-1967 Power F1 ping Code.

5, ' Manual of steel Construction,* American Institute of Steel Constructaan, Inc., Eagnth Edition, 1980.

f

. 6-

.