ML20117C571
| ML20117C571 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 04/30/1985 |
| From: | Edelman M CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| References | |
| REF-PT21-85, REF-PT21-85-242-000 (RDC-125(85)), PT21-85-242, PT21-85-242-000, PY-CEI-OIE0038, PY-CEI-OIE38, NUDOCS 8505090463 | |
| Download: ML20117C571 (2) | |
Text
s.
bm e f THE CLEVELAND ELECTR P.O. BOX 5000 - CLEVELAND, OHIO 44101 - TELEPHONE (216) 622-9800 - ILLUMINATING BLDG.
- 55 PUBLICSQUARE Serving The Best Location in the Nation April 30, 1985 MUN%Y R. EDRMAN PY-CEI/OIE0038-LQ VICE PRESIDENT NUCMAR Mr. James G. Keppler Regional Administrator, Region III Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 RE:
Perry Nuclear Power Plant Docket Nos. 50-440; 50-441 Possible Malfunctions of Ruskin Supplied Fire Dampers
[RDC 125(85)]
Dear Mr. Keppler:
This letter serves as an interim report pursuant to 10CFR50.55(e) on potential significant deficiency associated with Ruskin supplied fire damper closure under normal air flow.
Mr. J.
McCormick-Barger of your office was first notified on January 29, 1985, by Mr.
R. G. Solt of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI).
Our first interim report was dated February 27, 1985.
The problem is being evaluated per Deviation Analysis Report 221.
Description of Deficiency In mid-January 1985, CEI was advised by its contractor, Robert Iraay Co., of a 10CFR21 report filed by their supplier Ruskin Manufacturing Co. concerning possible closure problems of some fire dampers supplied for use at Perry Nuclear Power Plant (PNPP).
The 10CFR21 report states that the dampers may not close under normal air flow.
Completion of Evaluation To date, Ruskin has supplied CEI with generic test reports which show the capabilities of damper closure against air flow.
- CEI, in turn, has completed an engineering evaluation of the installed configurations versus the configuration tested by Ruskin for the Model No. IBD-23 dampers located in Unit 1 and Common facilities.
This engineering evaluation has outlined the modifications necessary to conform to Ruskin's reports.
To establish dispo-sition and a modification schedule, the latest Fire Protection 8505090463 850430 PDR ADOCK 05000440 pyg M
S g lg95 ZW31 'yY
~~
A.
Mr. Jcmen G.:Kappler April 30, 1985 i
. Evaluation Report is.being used to evaluate which dampers are necessary to meet CEI commitments to the USNRC regarding fire protection.
Another_ report, either interim or final, will be provided when additional information becomes available.'
Please call if there
-are any questions.
Sincerely, Murra$uR.Edelman Vice President Nuclear Group MRE:sab cc:
Mr. J. A. Grobe USNRC, Site Office (SBB50)
Mr. D. E. Keating
~
USNRC, Site Office (SBB50)
Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission c/o Document Management Branch Washington, D.C. 20555 Records Center,.SEE-IN Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 1100' Circle 75 Parkway,-Suite 1500 Atlanta, Georgia 30339 cu