ML20117A229

Forwards Revised FSAR QA Program Description,Reflecting Recent Changes & Changes Transmitted on 840827

ML20117A229
Person / Time
Site:	Satsop
Issue date:	04/24/1985
From:	Sorensen G WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To:	Martin J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
GO3-85-223, NUDOCS 8505080112
Download: ML20117A229 (47)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:c -

m1f,

~ Washington Public Power Supply System pB* ' man _ g Box 1223 Elma, Washington 98541 (206)482-4428 q April 24, 1985 G03-85-223 Docket No. 50-508 U. 5. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region V Attention: Mr. J. B. Martin, Regional Administrator Office of Inspection and Enforcement 1450. Maria Lane, Suite 260 Walnut Creek, California 94596-5368

Subject:

NUCLEAR PROJECT 3 CHANGES TO THE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

References:

1) Supply Sy, stem Letter (G03-84-537), G. C. Sorensen to J.-8. Martin, same subject, dated August 27, 1984. 2) NRC Letter, D. F. Kirsch to G. C. Sorensen, subject, " Quality Assurance Program Description for, Nuclear Project 3", dated, October 29, 1984. Reference 1 transmitted changes to the WNP-3 Quality Assurance Program Description which were found to be acceptable by NRC (reference 2). Those changes to the QA Program Description have not yet been incorporated into a WNP-3 FSAR' Amendment. The Supply Systers has recently made additional changes to the QA Program Description. The ' Supply System considers these changes not to be a reduction in commitments and, therefore, they are being submitted to you within 90 days as required by 10CFR50.55(f). 8505000112 850424 'PDR ADOCK 050 0 A qoo1 'I

7 1 { Attached is the entire FSAR QA Program Description showing the changes previously transmitted by reference 1 (FSAR Change Notice - SCN 662) and the recent changes (SCN 677). If you have any questions, please contact Mr. L. J. Garvin, Project Quality Manager at (206) 482-4428, Ext. 5403. C G. C. Sorensen, Manager Regulatory Programs DWC/cae Attachment cc: Mr. J. A. Adams, NESCO Mr. L. Bast, Ebasco - Elma Mr. W. L. Bryan, Washington Water Power Company Mr. A. Cutrona, Ebasco - Elma Ebasco, Elma Mr. G. W. Knighton, NRC Mr. J. R. Lewis, Bonneville Power Administration Mr. R. V. Myers, Puget Sound Power & Light Company Mr. J. Porrovecchio, Ebasco - New York Mr. N. S. Reynolds (Bishop, Liberman, Cook, Purcell and Reynolds) Mr. J. P. Sluka, Ebasco - Elma Mr. D. Smithpeter, BPA Mr. S. F. Swearngin, BPA Mr. A. A. Tuzes, Combustion Engineering Mr. W. L. Weislogel, Pacific Power & Light Company Mr. B. D. Withers, Portland General Electric Company Mr. H. Worchel, Ebasco - New York Docket Control Desk - U. S. NRC / f ,-,----,m --,,y. ,,--,,,,..,,,-,,---,-,---,,,,,,-,.-,,r

w WNP-3 -k ~ 2759W-1 FSAR ~. 2 = 17.0 CUALITY ASSURANCE = Washington Public Power Supply System shall implement an overall Quality construction and ] Assurance Program (QA Program) for the design, procurement, operation of Supply System's Nuclear Project No. 3 (WNP-3) in accordance with 4 the requirements of Appendix "B" of 10CFR50. As the applicant, the Supply j System is responsible for the plant and will take appropriate actions to ' assure ~that it is designed, procured,' constructed and operated in accordance , N with sound engineering principles and practices. Systems, components and Ii structures that are safety-related, in the context of 10CFR20,10CFR50 and ( 10CFR100, will be designed, specified, fabricated, installed, tested and operated in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements, codes, l g. standards, specifications and procedures. The objective of the Supply System l is to' implement a-QA Program that is responsive to the requirements of NRC y7 A Regulations, 10CFR50, Appendix "B", " Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear ? Power Plants" by assuring that quality-related efforts are performed in a f controlled manner and are documented to provide objective evidence of f9 compliance. d i 17.1 QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION - WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM { 17.1.1 ORGANIZATION 4 I This Section describos the orgs'nizational relationships within the Supply .] System and assigns the authorities and responsibilities for the administration i and implementation of the Quality Assurance Program. Assigned authorities and e responsibilities demonstrate the organizational. freedom of Quality Assurance. This organizational, freedom is accomplished through Corporate and Project I structures which provide \\ independence from Supply System organizations = responsible for " construction." i -s At the Corporate Level, the Director and stiff of Licensing and Assurance, and at the Project (jobsite) Level, the Project QA Manager and staff, are i [u completely free from responsibility of cost and scheduling during " construction." The Director, Licensing and Assurance, and the Project QA Manager have the freedom and authority to identify qualitf-related problems, initiate corrective actions (including stop work) and recommend or provide 9g solutions and to verify the implementation of corrective actions.

I^

Each nuclear power plant construction project is administered by a Project iy Program Director. The Program Director is directly accountable to the f5f Director of Projects and is responsible for the safe, successful and timely completion of construction of the project. The Program Director accomplishes e.g j the project responsibilities by' managing and directing the Engineering g Organization (the AE), which is performing design; the Construction Management t Organization, which manages the installation subcontractors on the project; and Project Supply' System personnel. The Engineering Organization (the AE) 3W and the Construction Management Organization may be a different or the same ( entity. . n SCM GG1 !%s 17.1-1 Amendment No. 4, (12/83) iy, - - _ ~

WNP-3 FSAR 2759W-2,, G Tha crganizations of the Supply System and Supply System Quality Assurance are . j' procented on Figures 17.1-1, 17.1-2 and 17.1-3. The functional rocponsibilities for the inplementation of the Supply System Quality Assurance Program are assigned as follows. j i 17.1.1.-1 Corporate , j. 17.1.1.1.1 Managing Director The Managing Director of the Supply System bas'the ultimate responsibility for tha Quality Assurance Program. The Managing. Director shall assure that the J Pr: gram is implemented and maintained by assigning the appropriate authority L cad-responsibility to the Director of Licensing and Assurance.. 17.1.1.1.2 Deputy Managing Director ' Tha Deputy Managing Director has delegated autbarity to implement policies of l 5 . ths Managing Director. The Deputy Managing Director S :::n :;i h to the dr-- Man:ging Director and is responsible for: trcpects o) Coordinating and integrating the activities of Supply System l organizations. b) Supporting and advising the Managing Director on the performance of Supply System functions and evaluations of such. c) Acting for the Managing Director, as required. I 17,1,1.1.3 Director of Projects (dtd is reeroA5IblCJ } ~ { Tha Director of Projects report: ;;f i: :::;. ;.;ik-to the Managing Directord-fsr development and implementation of policies and programs supporting the I d:cign and construction phase. Tha Director of Proieets carries out his responsibilities through the Program Directors. See acd P'9tl ~ Hons Assist $ttt 00.no.cjy;;W.;e5, Cbero: 17.1.1.1.f 6 W :::::: :f ":n;. i::- i / C j Aniskt %":r:ig Directog Operstfons The ?ir e:.:: ef r 2r :;;irr reports to the Managing Director and is rcsponsible for the safe and efficient operation of all Supply System ) cperating power plants. h I17.1.1.1.5

Director,

hre!:;7 Gnywetet$

h .dr-- ThaDirector,Teyv1Ctrinjr:1:;,, reports to the Managing Director and is responsible 4:- - En l fcrt i ( o) Providing technical and engineering support to the project. [ l b) Assisting the Project Engineering organization in providing technical N d direction to the Architect Engineer. sc/J Wo Z_ . Amend-act No. 4, (12/83) _] ~ _. _..... _ - ._17.1-2

4 m _ ~ WNP-3 .27599-3

PSAR, h(M kg 2,

'i- .s c) Assisting the project in performing technical overview of Supply System ( activities, d) ASE Code consultation to the project, including interfacing with ASME. e) Performing and managing selected technical programs, having f applicability to several projects. f) Providing independent technical evaluations when requested by the Managing Director. 1 g) overall Supply System engineering records management policy. Implementation'of the policy with regards to functions described in { this manual is the responsibility of all Directorates, as applicable. 47 17.1.1.1.[7 Directo$ k Support Serdenasewt

pus,

+ l The Director, k Support Services reports to theg anaging Director and is M 3 y responsible for the development and implementation of policies and programs which support design, construc' tion and operation of Supply System plants.4e-p

.i; -.._; ;f ;;f;g ;;d :::r-i-. Areas in which the Director of Support Services provides support for the projects include industrial safety and fire i

protection, administration, eed securityg Also responsible for ensuring that +% ~ thejpalibration of measuring and test et ipment is performed in accordance i witt approved procedures which establis calibration frequencies, procedures 4 use{, recall methods, identification req raments, tolerances and records rechired en =e*=h14 =h man 4pment history a d calibration data. 5hWW FLY 1b. t%d,iO [(g,{ pt=0 6g6,Y l$ ~ .1.1.1. 'lA. Chief Financial Officer w- !,M The Chief Financial Officer reports to the Managing Director and is l f responsible for the development of Corporate material management and i procurement policy and the procurement and control of Corporate multiple I ,jg project and specialized materials and related services required to support the .p@. sign and construction of Supply System nuclear power plants. 17.1.1.1.8 Director, Licensing and Assurance ( 54rul i5 f tHCWGbiC] The Director, Lic@,, sing and Assurance, reports _ f ir ::::_.;il; to the f Managing Directorffor the overall development, implementation and verification i l of the Supply System Quality Assurance and Nuclear Safety and Reguistory Programs to ensure compliance with regulations, codes and standards. These responsibilities. include a) Interpretaton of ASE Code Quality Assurance requirements and Quality Assurance manual requirements, i b) Definition, approval, revision and t bution of Supply System .(r Quality Assurance manuals to ensure that the manuals adequately i describe requirements. ~~ l c) Approvs1 of all corporate and project quality affecting implementing } procedures and instructions and Project Quality Assurance Instructions. i 17.1-3 Amendment No. 4, (12/83) ^'~ ,ii -_ J.T_~ T -- -. :~:~L. - r ~

~ ~ ~ u WNP-3 sm Sol (oloz_ l " ^ ^ s d) Determining the adequacy and effectiveness of program implementation. o) Apprising the Managing Director of the effectiveness of the Quality p Assurance and Nuclear Safety and Regulatory Programs by periodic 5 r.eporting of activities, trends and problems, through established corrective action systems. f) Exercising the authority vested in the Quality Assurance organization i to cause the acceptance or rejection of materials and components based .( on conformance verification to engineering requirements and the requirements of the ASME Code. b I g)' Ensuring that'Qu$lity Assurance and Nuc1' ear" Safety and Reg 61 story' ' ~ policies and programs provide Project Quality Assurance and Licensing Managers the freedom to inform the Director of Licensing and Assurance [ of significant conditions affecting quality. r 'h) Maintaining cognizance of changing regulatory requirements and providing controlled interface between the Supply System and Regulatory agencies so as to assure that commitment documents receive the j necessary degree and depth of reviews prior to, transmittal. 1) W ercising authority to stop nonconforming work of any Supply System '*ontractor or Supplier organization; and notification of the Authorized 4 l uclear Inspector (ANI) of the work stoppage for ASME activities. ( r f j) ';nsuring the adequacy, clarity and appropriateness of Supply System j 'uality Assurance and Nuclear Safety and Regulatory ofiented communications and commitments directed to Supply System direct contracts and the Authorized Inspection Agency. i k) Ensuring that significant conditions affecting quality or Nuclear j Safety and Regulatory Programs, which are identified by Project Quality Assurance and which are addressed to the Licensing and Assurance Directorate for resolution, are adequately investigated add /or corrected. 1) Providing licensing support functions in such areas as acquisition and maintensoce of nuclear power plant construction permits and operating f licenses. a) Administering Corporate and Projecti Quality Assurance and Nuclear Safety and Regulatory Program activities. n). Establishment and maintenance of adequate and qualified Licensing and i Assuf uce staffing (onsite as well as offsite) levels based on work load analysis. i Tha Director, Licensing and Assurance has effective communication channels with c11 Supply System senior management positions and has no duties or rx p:nsibilities unrelated to quality / safety assurance and licensing. To cecomplish the above defined role, the Director, Licensing and Assurance ,j cperctes through the Manager g Construction Quality Assurance, the Manager of s 3 j j and Mamy geradha.1 F Audits and-the Manager p( Regulatory Programs h5M 0-YKf Progfami. p g _p .,,--.~_m__._. s,_ _ - _ _ _. _.,.

q; --- T T_ ^ ~

i 27.59W-5 SAR x

\\ 17.1.1.1.8.1 Manager, Construction Quality Assurance The Manager, Construction Quality Assurance reports to the Director, Licensing t and Assurance and is responsible for the development and implementation of cha q Quality .:rance program during the Nuclear Power Plant Design an QA functiovi5 M 5cc. Construction phases. He is also responsible for Procurement QA; plant modifications; qualification and. certification of Supply System nondestructiv j examination.and inspection personnel and other personnel requiring l l certification; surveillance of nondestructive examination and inspection activities;'and has'1Ehe lead role for' acquiring and maintaining ASE l Certificates of Authorization. Included in his responsibilities are: 4 f -4) Ensuring that ASE. Code requirements are properly interpreted and. included in the Quality Assurance program requirements. k b) Interfacing with the Authorized Nuclear Inspector (ANI), Authorized j Inspection Agency and the Enforcement Authority. j t c) Ensuring that a written agreement with an Authorized Inspection Agency l is obtained to provide for ANI Services; and that the ANI is provided 4 free access. d) Ensuring that all nondestructive examination personnel involved in 4 armnination activities are certified in accordance with ASNT and/or the ASE Code. j e) Acquisition and maintenance of 'ASE Certificates of Authorization { and/or Owners Certificates, yr-ovichnay for z -~" -- N ------ '.:::-certification of Supply System personnel who M f) perform quality affecting activities. g gg Q] g)

• Developing and maintaining the Supply SystengASME Quality Assurance 4-- f' Program Manual.
• \\

b) Reviewing and approving Project Quality Assurance '{nstructions. P I i) Reviewing and concurring with offsite design documents (such as drawing /and pecification to assure conformance to the QA Program +l f requirements. cardy'ad WWQyp( j) Reviewing proposed changes to the Quality Assurance Program, defined in SAR documents, for Director, Licensing and Assurance approval. J k) Providing technical services to other Licensing and Assurance h departments,as requested. 1) Providing Initial Quality Assurance Indoctrination and Training for Supply System personnel. g m) Quality Assurance functions associated with plant modifications that f I are comparable to activities occurring during the initial construction I /' phase. [ 17.1-5 /sendment No. 4, (12/83) I ......i ... E. '. E. Z i. Z ~ ~ 1 -.E T:1 Clil:Z:. Z.*~~~~~Z ^~ r - 2

t_ .s b WNP-3 27599-6 ' PSAR 8 n) Vendor qualification, review and concurrence with vendor furnished ~,j l programs and procedures, source verification (e.g., surveillances, q inspections and audits at Vendor's Facilities) and receiving inspection 9 4 ( of vendor furnished items received at the Corporate warehousesf4hrog-He .%% Proedered GM As sp.rweg, 17.1.1.1.8 A Manager,pt Audits c7 (W" s Tha Manager,p( Audits,intaining an organizatio.+ of qualified auditorsreports to the Dir + 10 responsible for ma ( roeponsible for-verifying implementation of tha Quality Assurance Program as fellows: ..a. ~} - c) Performing Quality Assurance audits of internal Supply System i-I orBanizations and external organizations (e.g., AE/CM); except for Management Audits.; j i b) .Dev, eloping audit schedules and selecting qualified personnel to perform the activities of this function. c)' Cartification of Audit Team Leaders. 4 d) Training of audit personnel. t 4 { .c) Participating in audits and providing overview of AE activities. y f) Periodic review of Corporate and Project audit reports to identify any quality trends which may constitute a need for corrective action. M g) Maintenance of audit records. 9 M '17.1.1.1.8.3 Manager)/RegulatoryPrograms ) 4 ThaManager[9/ Regulatory Programs reports to the Director, Licensing and Ascurance, and is responsible for the development and implementation of policies and programs which support design, construction and eploration of i I Supply System plants in the area of Nuclear Licensing. Areas 15 which the Mareger of Regulatory Programs provides support for the projects include e cavironmental compliance and licensing. The Manager of Regulatory Programs is l r:cpoesible for establishment and maintenance of Supfly Systas/ regulatory interfaces and assuring that nuclear licensing transmittals receive an .I cdequate, competent and timely review prior to asking commitments. 17.1.1.2 WNP-3 Site 17.1.1.2.1 Proenn Director Tha ' r [drd h restoruJDI D N o r'i S f Program Director dr r 7- * ::d 2:rerrtri_4 to the Director of p l Projects for the safe, successful and timely completion of the project.- This ( y rolo is accomplished through the management and direction of the Architect Engineer and Construction Management organization and Supply System personnel. Np M,j/ Orgcnizations performing quality-related activities which report to the s. Pr: gram Director include eineerine and Construction. 9roltet 9450J.fCt Sh cX ) b . _ - -}zW...-.N5%wa eq NgW l7 I - Io 1 = .x

==-

===

wy ( 7 I ' LO'bers. pe.csonned acc. reepsi ble for co cr3 ng 7 bd re.goct Mmrnistra+ive.g i out h ec* -Fanc*rons 3 to other T>sce.c. torc #es, ne Progra.m Director-j estabitsbes their fu.nctione l prioeb-ies dnck j fo ike j ino.na.ges +b eir c.o n rei b u.ti'an o.chiedene.& of the-propc p a.n, scnekte q i N cund Cost goa.ls.. b i 'm i 7 Insert ~ AT 60mM of Peeviou s PAGE 1 Scu sev { 1 i k - l l 4 I j h I t

n. l-G A 0

I v, - $M -,-. --WV** 9' w - = ene-my_

, _,_ u ~ 2. WNP-3 .. 11$9u-7 Tskn 1 k I i l*T. t.'t.1.7. +-[Se e inset-T rwbet- (He]. t M k3f4 g (O g(* 17.1.1.2./3 ering and Construction ?: ...r f,, L - d rrogram Director by directing overa u engineering, e M project management and construction activities through the Engineering Manager k i and the Construction Manater. { the-following functions: + reslIo. m -tWDic foy-f TheyEngineering and Construction # _5hd_... 4 _ W& m% a) . hview and approve, equipment.and construction specifications and. changes thereto, to assure that the contractual requirements delineated in the bidding documents and the general and special conditions sections provide the requirements necessary to administer the contract s ner din"dkN iwd overyleu) af h AE-CH con $& 00& acts @j(> g,,yy. to assure that activities affecting Y b) w =4-<- -- ?" rh==-a r a- - - - - quality are performed in accordance with the requirements specified in { the procurement documents, and when nonconformances are identified, ? approved corrective action is implemented in a timely and effective j 7 manner. i i c) Be responsible for the quality of the work, implementation of schedules, cost control techniques, policies and objectives of the t*7.l.t.2..

15. i.5dse.e. rase < ts m p A v g 17.1.1.2./

2:jr- '--4---**"O Asssstews ?rgraq 'ptrec.*oq %r exerA 4eW% reports % ske. p; rector, Erg ~neerg M is ua.f De. AN f:r -

1. a= 4 --

A- ~ ?E-d---

f g Engineering ;t;11 1; :.;g :iti:%e pqw, %Tonomy Ad dawstrucHbn,&vd is respo

( a) Review and approve prepurchased equipment and construction specifications and changes thereto to assure that the Supply System, , technically adequate. ~ f regulatory, code and standard requirements are included and are l l s swnlutdes b) Ag nenberpl of the Nonconformance Review Board, approve,and/or deeeem6ee the disposition of nonconforming items, material or co itions found during site activities, & romflWCE.

• esMlEsh attuene d.

s l c) Providek personnel to the Supply System Project Qeality Assurance Group to assist in vendor surveillance activities and to perform surveillance ~ and audits of site contractors and AE/CM Home Office activities. d) Provide technical information and/or direction for accomplishment of QA/QC functions when requested by the Project QA Manager. { l' I '.l,+ b ~7 Q S e e-iv1584~T on o Acic. cd-w pauct-u - l i .~.....- m =_ =, = =. m - =.. m. _ _ s.. m., _ m. m d i ---

• d ;; ::I ::: dinctir; th: '"r- * --> '*

rt_,. vs cles (uncu..uul Ivee f ="#a f b= t'e "*/'', ??? ?:pplier, " ;d;;, 0;;;.;. u 5uppAy system J vosa u.11 6us or..n4,=*4 ann. m well as. inter #=e4ag d t5 '_i;;;;io. .u I

G lie;;;is; ;;f p:-- i";- f S t::t ;d. a&Lup.

SoJ Mo ? - i 17.I - 7 ,e-. s. e,,,ss._,/. -.13*%10 %.. >>,q.,z m-n..w ..~;, .ee e. ee -

s-p sen.r ur roys og pww P%c (. : ~t . q.7. l. i. 2. z g,oegc, prosed aescurces l i l The.

Manger,

' Pro 3ect Rescu.cces, regorts 4e +he. Progrown TXrechor G.nd. % resfoos\\ble -for provid3nq sqgor+ y i y PrQecd pe.rsonnd Tn ywaffers re.laftg %, / a). Cw % ci siseg oon+ro.cf g<egacok3o n, wa.cd.\\n f l a,d emforcin er cf ~ c.ontra.ch, Wrigtn. eeu.try Godradg cov j i rgu.trevneeh ed Yno M ic M ns j k b) T roce*5 Q f ST'ett Sy+'"n dir** P"C'b***S & 1 masrrod, e a 1g m.a.# cmd secvices. { \\ c) Assu.ccs -{ca.ra; of assTyed personnd. ) cD h6mtsts+rMo~n o4 % Aefer-< eobact o.wvA. ( overview; of the Ae/c/1 oamin rstroi ion /2 0 chiVi ties. ) i / j e) AdminWidIVe segpor* io %e. geogect. i A, ~ i i %y,, Egineerq. W &strw_h%, reports,) The H Proye wreduc; ud is rc+posale for io

c. w a ' c. m s + r u.ci,

• direcA,3 overa.ll engrneerry%co$ the-a.c+i vi-H es p--

d.tre. ctg E er, Cems+rn+i n am& Mana.gec, &s Hoyt Hana.gement; awcl NdtreetIg 9heoM OE / d Wrdo EteerDT AsstsM Pr$=t Man *6er. / Licensq Projec h ~ scae .zasar uaxe PA WN /7 /, /,7,3 g um me l

n. s u L2===

==

J

g -. g.. ;.

- msetr of]_.. -.-PAa1E r1.T7-l JT. t.1. 2. 4- %e.a.ger, O.S.nsinctre-q T l - The. y, e,ns+rwc*i% rep io the Nama_ger; EngiMerg du.d Obytstrucfon, CMd Is rc5fonsible. br ovex vi eua of Ebasco eM cun a s1+e C% &rachts l Activ i+ies in comele+r the Geristru.ctron of % e. grye# withrn o froyecf scheclu.Ie amd. O.onstru.cHern bu.d.get b coveformomce win esirJo lished r u irem eds, j Hom Receeds Hama. ) ~ l'1 1.'L 2. 6 Re.c.ecds MMa.gemed; gun i-The Haaa.gr3 eqineec d G u s4ru n ant, decl. s y s ' ble. q ncktrec+1q Gmd cardtnoltng. Hwa. for is records Muta_ geoid Ochtui+res on %, pcq,g, j ~ ~

11. I. I.2 7 Ucenst Project' Han "Y)'

er The Licens ;>t - Projed-Mama-6k (c? R diorg to ro.ms, rw o+r ix ed +o SE u s+c m, u & cs cesfons* *- e ww-k .[or ihe llocoing? Sul'>mitta.ls rece'ive Ade uale J \\ ice.as l 4 433ues iechnica.1 revi S. Ma.trdalws ud 0.bvitrols 'ee kh rke. Wi'th ' l b) ceostrucHve *WecMVe> % 4 R.C. assore 3 o.nd discipliet.4 d.lo.logne. taMh >1RC. j i l revleuw-cs c) hviews au su.lomithdt 40 % A3RC for-I Gonsis+eaaeg (.41% py-evfou.s eorrespenee A s W Ell as corporaic OMcf projec.t 901icies cuck {Xoced u.res, j _~~ SCM (c 6 7 7 es! PAGE 17./-7 1 nrfd31Nb-Trnrrrmrrr:c;r;.

WNP-3 y 5cW (g(o2. 2759W-8, PSR r, - "SCd 677 T.1.1.1.5 L u..n of L::dr w-==g =

• M

?- "-- ;;:: ; f ; -- u. h-e._. ;. ::p:=: :; ;L. 3.1... 1;; ;;d C t-"-*4 an ?----

f ir -- ; ::ith f:: din ni.... wundia.uu..11 ;;...J; L

M_ a ___,,; x 4 4*4.. .ctmp t l 17,1.1.2. Project 1 Quality Assurance Manager The Project Quality Assurance Manager reports to the Manager of Construction Quality Assurance and is responsible for verifying implementation of the l Supply System's Quality Assurance Program at the WNP-3 Project. The Project 4 Quality Assurance Manager provides sesistance to the Program Director to intcgrate the quality Assurance. with other Project organisations' activities.. Tha cinimum qualifications for Project Quality Assurance Manager include a BS Degree in Engineering, or a related field, and 10 years experience in Nuclear J Directly reisted [QualityAssuranceortechnicallyrelatedactivities. experience may be substituted for academic requ rec:rd of performance clearly demonstrates an ability to fill the position without question. Th3 Project Quality Assurance Manager is independent'from the Supply System crg:nisations responsible for angineering, procurement and construction. 4 0 The Project Quality Assurance. Manager has the freedom and authority to ~ identify quality problems, ini-iste, recommend or provide corrective actions, 1; varify the implementation of the corrective action and control further proc:ssing, delivery or insta; tation of a nonconforming ites, or a deficiency cr unsatisfactory condition until proper disposition has been made, including I cespying work for quality reasons. Th3 Project, Quality Assurance Manager shall be responsible fort c) verification of the implementation of the Design and Construction Quality Assurance Requirements Manual b) Stop Work Authority ( c) identification and reporting of nonconformances d) verification by audits and surveillances that the AE, CH, selected contractor and other project organizations are implementing applicable quality requirements o) assuring that adequate staffing is obtained to implement QA actions at the project f) the assignment of adequately trained and qualified / certified personnel l to perform quality verification activities i Q rview AE/CM approval of contractor's procedures and instructions i)psurance,to the Program Director and Director, Licensing and eporting l significant conditions adverse to quality {%./ Assurance for use in developing standards for Licensing and Assurancehpeporting I( manatement systems _to_ nrmeluda ranneitten of OA nroblem ~hMp@iMEM afa hTedhe3 raws con c.! proemdwus' DelFgation of Author IM_ _ r %ese d%e, Suppl { h5h, abesce / 17.1.1.3

== N "* b _M N a d * % sceh (A % ge The Supply System maintains ultimate respons15mty Tor une quauty usurene. mF Program and has delegated certain Quality Assurance functions to the following mejar orgsnizations: 17, ) - g i ,,,.__.I 7 . - ~. -..,

~ - -.. WNP-3

FSAR, 2759W-9

./?. /./ 3 a) Ebasco Services, Incorporated (Ebasco) Architect-Engineering, Construction Management and Quality Assurance Services Ebasco has been contracted to provide the Architect-Engineering, f Construction Management and Quality Assurance activities for WNP-3. As e AE and Construction Manager, Ebasco is responsible for generation and l administration of specifications for procurement of prepurchased equipment and construction activities...These contract specifica"tions i System for r pev ewnd ap oval rt=== W af are sent he Su p1 , tracts #tt The Ebasco QA responsibility includes Home Office QA[sDf" s 17.1.*.) V j vendor surveillance'd ( ;; Scir : i : 4 Yte;;e 1: 55 ;:::151: ;r ;;;d::tir;; *--- 'i d @:lity.^.; esce - .... m ;, - - - - _.....' a _ _.. s.,. m. _. 4-b) Combustion Engineering, Incorporated (CE) ( Nuclear Steam Supply System Supplier j 'f p f CE has been contracted to provide the Nuclear Steam Supply System which j includes the responsibility of QA/QC Activities within their scope of l supply. (See Subsection 17.1.3.) 4; W u)s19-3 Figure 17.1-[111ustrates the : 12:i ::if-irr::r S Supply System contractor /g in-fe heu"es. 6 l D Ehisco as resfetsbIe, lee a.mn 44tJ dk Ahclewj,,tark_perEnsud by crafrAciers is A&f r ist.a.ccertbre u;Mk -f h6 4xtsco GA rhet [sde t l sJsecfion 1712. ctMhmpiceedhq)h sde4precd s or le Acu.$, - 4 pcc 4he acid rs os>n Z?A FYegstm cMd coittracter't mp#creutii t I coceduxes. E o is a.(se v esgem ble fo r ccactac tig l{9uLIlyhsSv. tce 4ukts of ceninck n+d Wtter ndu.c.f'Rrevs - { f A I l l r Scd G62 I 1 S c M (o 7 7 I ) } I 17.1-9 Amendment No. 4, (12/83) -.. _ _.,., _,,.,. ~. -.. _. _. ,.o,

T -- - 2 WNP-3 I76lif-r

• FSAR' r

l t 17.1.1.4 Quality Assurance Program j Tha Supply System's Program is based upon and provides for the assignment of Quality Classifications,to structures, components and systems as identified in 4 Tchio 3.2-1 of this FSAR. Structures, components and systems are classified as Quality Class I, II-Augmented, II and G in accordance with their design bacio'and functional or regulatory requirements. The Supply System Quality s As urance classification are as follows. Quality Class I f Any safety-related structure, system, subassembly, component or design ' characteristic for'which the requirements'of' Appendix B, 10CF150 are applied. .The Supply System has and may elect to designate a non-safety-related

otructure, system, subassembly, component, or design characteristic

,. Quality Class I. 4 4-I ! Quality Class II-Aussented (IIA) 1 2 Those non-safety-related structures, systems, subassemblies, components, or dacign characteristics which are required to meet applicable commercial q ctendards and for which additional QA requirements are stipulated to ensure that all design, construction, and testing provisions are met and documented. 4 The cdditional QA requirements are delineated in the 2pplicable FSAR sections. j Quality Class II t Any non-safety-related structure, system, subassembly, component or design 4 char cteristic which, as a result of being defective, could cause a safety hazard to plant personnel, an extended reduction in unit' output, an unscheduled unit trip, or equipment damage. Quality Class II items / services cre required to meet applicable commercial standards. 3 } Quality Class C Any non-safety-related system, structure, subassembly, componen or design charceteristic which is required to meet applicable commercial standards. Safoty-related I Thc63 structures, systems, subassemblies, components, or design charceteristics which are necessary to assure the following: a) The integrity of the reactor coolant pressure boundary, i b) The capability to shut down the reactor and maintain it in a safe i shutdown condition, or c) The capability to prevent or mitigate the consequences of accidents j which could result in potential offsite exposures comparable to the N guideline exposures of 10CTR100. J f i 17.1-10 Amendment No. 4, (12/83) n.

i WNP-3 FSAR 7'1W-2 6 Structures, systems, and components which are designated ANS Safety Class 1, 2, or 3 and electrical class 1E are safety-related. j t The Supply System's Design and Construction Quality Assurance Requirements Manual contains the written policies and Quality Assurance requirements (QAR's) on which the WNP-3 Site Quality Assurance Program is based. These d requirements are derived from and conform to the requirements of ANSI-N45.2 j and 10CFR50, Appendix B. A matrix of the Supply System QA requirements and i corresponding criteria from 10CF150, Ap w iw B appears in the table below followed by a description of the scope covered by these procedures. t Supply 4 l Systes QAR 10CFRSO, ' Appendix B Criteria- ~ I Organization QAR-1 i( II Quality Assurance QAR-2 j j III Design Control QAR-3 i IV Procurement Document Control QAR-4 i V Instructions, Procedures and Drawings QAR-5 i VI Document Control QAR-6 1 VII-Control of Purchased Material, Items QAR-7 .and Services VIII Identification and Control of Material, QAR-8 i Parts and Components a II ' Control of Special Processes QAR-9 u I QAR-10 f I Inspection ( XI Test Control QAR-11 III Control of Measuring and Test Equipment QAR-12 IIII Handling, Storage, Shipping and Preservation QAR-13 i XIV Inspection, Test and Operating Status QAR-14 4 IV Nonconforming Materials and Items QAR-15 1 1 QAR-16 XVI Corrective Action XVII Quality Assurance Records QAR-17 QAR-18 ? IVIII Audits I ) i it ! - I I i

t

q WNP-3 2761W-3:

FSAR 1 A c) Organization, QAR-1 -.j i Establishes an organizational structure that will direct the resources ( of the Supply System and its contractors to engineer, design, procure, fabricate, manufacture, install, construct and test the Supply System Nuclear Project to =mwi=4me safety, reliability and efficiency. r I i b) Quality Assurance Program, QAR-2 Defines the Quality Assursace Program established by the Supply System. l for design and construction. Included in this program is a system for classifying structures, systems, components, design characteristics and .] procurement documents to determine the -Quality Assurance activities t associated with each ites. ) s c) Design Control, QAR-3 I g' Establishes a system of independent reviews to assure applicable quality, regulatory, code and design basis requirements are properly translated into design and procurement documents for each structure, system and component. The documented review provides a check for i design adequacy, inspectability and compatibility with intended usage. 4 d) Procurement Document Control, QAR-4 ~ q Establishes a systen to assure that procurement documents and changes t d thereto incorporate the technical.and quality assurance requirements 4 1 necessary to assure the gus11ty and integrity of procured material, t I equipment and services. l l c) Instructions, Procedures and Drawings, OAR-5 Establiebes a system defining the requirements and responsibilities controlling the preparation, review, approval and release of instructions, procedures sod drawings which implement quality i requirements. ( 1 f) Document Control, QAR-6 l Establishes a system to control the issuance of documents, including changes thereto, which prescribe activities affecting quality. l k g) Control of Purchased Material Items and Services, QAR-7 Establishes a system to assure materisi, equipment sad services are l procured in accordance with the requirements specified in the l procurement documents. I 1 t ( 17.1-12 A=aad==nc No. 4, (12/83) v-TCYT:z.: .*D,_'::_- ,Tr;;; T rr~9 7 3 g777 y

. _ w._. ~~ WNP-3 A7619-4 FSAR i s S h) Identification and Control of Materials, Parts and Comnonents,.QAR-8 Establishes a system for the identification and control of material, parta, components, equipment and partially completed assemblies to assure that items incorporated into the plant are of proper configuration and, when necessary, traceable to all supporting quality assurance. documentation.. 1) Control'of Special Process, QAR-9 Establishes a system for the control of'special processes. .d) . Inspection, QAR-10 Establishes a system which assures the program requirements for l inspection are delineated in the specifications and contracts and assures that inspection and surveillance activities are performed in i 4 accordance with pre-determined requirements delineated in written instructions in a planned and systematic manner. k) Test Control, QAR-11 4 Establishes a system to assure that plant testing activities are l performed in accordance with pre-determined requirements approved and delineated in written instructions. ,' s., >j 1) Control of Measuring sad Test Equipment, QAR-12 { l Establishes a system for the control, calibration and adjustment of tools, gauges, instruments and other inspection, measuring, testing and maintenance devices at specified periods to assure the usage of proper l i type, range and accuracy necessary to verify conformance'to established requirements, a) Handling, Storage, Shipping and Preservation, QAR-13 k Establishes a system to control the handling, storage, shipping, cleaning and preservation of material, parts, components and equipment in accordance with written and approved procedures, instructions and recommendations, to assure that the design integrity and function of, the ites are maintained. n) Inspection Test and Operating Status, QAR-14 EstablishesasyItemtoindicatet,beinspection,testandoperating status for all structures, systems or components to preclude the inadvertent bypassing of their inspection and test requirementa and to prevent their inadvertent operation. ^ I 17.1-13 Amendment No. 4, (12/83) n :: - -, _. 1 . - x.. -.-.--.-.=.-. =:-.-- : :

x WNP-3 1 2761W-5 FSAR !l c) Nonconforming Materisl and Items,~QAR-15 fi 5 Establishes a system to assure that nonconformances are identified, documented, segregated or otherwise controlled to prevent inadvertent use or installation and that notification of action taken is transmitted to.the affected parties.. p) Corrective Action, QAR-16 Establishes a system to assure that significant conditions adverse to I quality are identified, the cause datermined, documented, brought to the attention of. upper. management, corrected as soon as possible and l that measures are taken to preclude repetition. 1 q) Quality Assurance Records QAR-17 j Establishes a system for the control and maintenance of all records sufficient and necessary to provide objective evidence of the activities affecting quality. 3 r) Audits, QAR-18' 1 Establishes a system of' audits to be performed in a planned and j 1 systematic manner to verify compliance and effectiveness of the Supply O System Quality Assurance Program. ~ Supply System Licensing and Assurance is responsible for establishing j I Quality Assurance policy, goals, and ob actives through the development and administration of the Supply System QA Program. This program is defined in the Supply System Design and Construction Quality Assurance, l Esquirements Manual developed by the Managegb_f Ranulatory Prorrans d j and reviewed and approved by the Director, iconsing and Assurance and endorsed by the Managing Director. g, Supply System QA personnel have the authority and responsibility to perform any actions necessary, including Stop Work Authori'ty, to accomplish their mandate as delineated in the Design and Construction Quality Assurance Requirements Manual. In matters of conflict regarding Quality Assurance policies or the Quality Assurance 4 organization's authority to enforce them at the working level, the j Director, Licensing and Assurance has direct access to all levels of I apper management, including the Managing Director, for satisfactory l resolution. To assure that Supply System personnel performing quality related activities are knowledgeable of QA procedures and requirements and will l be proficient in implementing them, training is established and documented as required by the applicable Supply System Quality Assurance Procedures / Instructions. This training consists of: ] b7 17.1-t4- _.m.___

p.s y,p,g ~. 2761W-6 FSAR. i 3 a) Initial formal indoctrination and training on the purpose, scope and implementation of applicable codes and standards, including 10CTR50, Appendix B. This initial training phase also includes specific detailed instruction on the Supply System's QA procedures and g instructions, Project Management procedures and other activities which directly relate to the employees job functions. Supply System j supervisory personnel also indoctrinate and train personnel performing quality related activities in.the principles and techniques of the activity being performed. f b) Ongoing instruction by lecture, reading assignment, discussion and J pre planned presentation, supplemented by outside courses as deemed i useful. l The Supply System's QA Program will comply with the requirements contained in 10CF150, Appendix 3, the guidance contained in NRC Regulatory Guides, ANSI Standards and the NRC documents entitled, " Guidance on Quality Assurance j Requirements During Design and Procurement Phase of Nuclear Power Plants", y ,f l Revision 1 (Gray Book) and " Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants", (Green Book) exceptions to 4 the Regulatory Guides during design and construction are ststed in FSAR Table i 1.8-1. Exceptions to the Regulatory Guides during Operations are described in Section 17.2. Regulatory Guide 1.58 will provide the basis for compliance by the Supply System to the QA requirements of Appendix B to 10CFR50 for ) i personnel qualifications. >q Co'otractors shall be required.by contract speciftestions to provide l ~ certification of their personnel who are qualiff ed in accordance with f ASNT-TC-1A to Ebasco for approval by Ebasco ASN"-TC-1A Level III individual (s). The Supply System QA Program's scope, implementation and effectiveness is audited by the Supply System's Corporate QA audit organization. Audit reports and correspondence generated are presented / routed to the Supply System's Upper Management, and Project Management, so that management can regularly assess j the effectiveness of the Quality Assurance Program. t Onan'annualbasis,theSupplySystem'smanagementwilla(rangefor ~ independent audit and evaluation of the adequacy, scope, implementation and effectiveness of the Supply System QA Program. This will be accomplished by ,* knowledgeable personnel outside the Licensing and Assurance Organization to assurp an objective program assessment. Results from this independent review- . j j will be reported to the Managing Director. j h 4 4 i } 4 17.1-15 Amendment No. 4, (12/83) [ t i L T T ~~ T: ~ ~ T

: J ^' ~ ~ T O C ~L X ~.*~~": r - -..

Crrar:rr:

s u a.w:. w.. ^ E ~' -l ~2; ~ '~ Scd 6 77 -s 2761W-f FSAR W i J /Tha Supply System requires its Quality Class I contractors, including Ebasco'

ndCE,toestablishandimplementQualityAssuranceProgramsconsistentwithj i

(tha applicable criemeim of 10CFR50. Appendix B4 The Quality Assurance i Programs of Ebasco and CE are reviewed for compliance with Appendix B by the Supply System. All Quality Class I contractor's Quality Assurance Programs ! cra reviewed by Ebasco and/or the Supply System.... LControl of quality related activities including management and technical intsrfaces between the contractor, the A/E, the Nuclear Steam System Supplier, cad the Owner during the phaseout of Design and Construction System turnover will be exercised by Ebssco in its role as Construction Manager in accordance with the QA program described in Subsection 17.1.2. 4 i All quality related turnover activities performed by the construction contractors /AE/CM/ Supply System will be governed by Design and Construction Quality Assurance Requirements Manual for the periodsthrough Provisional Acc:ptance. Quality reisted activities performed after Provisional Acceptance will be governed by the Operational QA program described in Section 17.2, with tha cxception of work returned to the construction contractors /AE/CM, in ccesrdance with Test and Startup procedures / instructions., which will be gov:rned by the QA programs described herein. 0 l The details of the Ebasco and CE QA-Programs are described in Subsections 17.1.2 and 17.1.3 respectively.. 17.1.1.5 Design Control Tha Supply System has organized and followed a system of design review and i cyproval by QA, Engineering, Licensing, Operations and Project Management of Supply System and Ebasco generated procurement documents for the Supply System Quality Class I systems, structures, subassemblies, components and design chcrectaristics. 7 In all cases, prior to submittal to either the Supply System or Ebasco for review and/or approval, the design contractors, including Ebasek, are ro ponsible,for verifying that the design meets the requirements of the cpecification, is commensurate with good design practices and that the components can be readily inspected. This verification is achieved by the perfcrmance of design reviews, the use of alternate or simplified calculation methods, or by the performance of a suitable testing program as described in 4 tha contractor Quality Assurance Program. The verification or checking precces is performed by individuals or groups other than those who performed i the criginal design. Where a test program is used to verify the adequacy of a specific design feature in lieu of other verification or checking processes, ] s %%ck nyaa sudy % 1 edruk.-4M.kspuka s be Ammc P ruc htare edMed wdk 4keapehea.We cid'r^, m, ucerdme wdk Gut r?; M sJ I c4 locmo, ArpeA B A-jP,,J%L-U - 1. -a \\u s,,, 4 A P e es pukrm &mik 0it n I werL/ htie6 to E6ascis cA TWqra n d4_moimahWZ. 6& $vecMurd, C-M I 17.1.16 _ _ _. _ Amendment No. 4.- (12/83L_Q vv wM,... f a m., -,... _

7 7, = --_.<,n UNP-3 2761W-8 FSAR it includes suitable qualification testing of a prototype unit under the most adverse design conditions. Design control measures are applicable to items such as the following: reactor physics stress, thermal hydraulic, radiation and accident analysis, compatibility or material; accessibility for in-service inspection, maintenance and repair, and the delineation of acceptance criteria for inspections and tests. Supply System' Project Engineering has the primary responsibility for the technical review and approval of Supply System and Ebesco generated prepurchased equipment and construction specifications. i Each discipline (mechanical, electrical, nuclear and civil), as applicable, reviews the, specifications to assure, technical adequacy..The depth of this. review is outlined in an engineering design review checklist utilized by the reviewing engineer for each Supply System Quality Class I specification. The design review checklist outlines a review of: ' i a) Design requirements, including the appropriate section of the FSAR and NRC Eagulatory Guides; b) Codes and Standards requirements; l c) Classification of characteristics; 4 d) Materials selection adequacy; 1 g ./ e) Testing requirements; l 'f) Welding requirements; i i g) Identification and serialisation; and, b) Preservation, packaging and handling. l Supply System Licensing reviews the specifications to assure conformance to I SAR and other regulatory requirements. t ( i Supply System Plant Management reviews the specifications to assure that the I item being specified can be inspected, operated and maintained. Supply System Project Management reviews and approves the specifications to assure that the general and special conditions sections contain adequate requirements for contract administration. Supply System QA, and/or Ebesco QA (Site and/or Home Office) reviews and approves the specification to assure that adequate requirements are included in the specifications. The QA review assures that I a) The specifications contain the necessary QA requirements; s' i i 17.1-17 Amendment No. 4, (12/83) - = m- =.

==

=. : ~~:

= - a::m :: ::

== w w a :

r.::-

-a p 4 WNP-3 ScM G ~7 7 2761W-9., FSAR 4 l b) The test and special processes are properly identified and contain appropriate acceptance / rejection criteria; c) The applicable QA codes and standards are specified; and d) 4:ality classifications are identified. QA signs the design review route sheet for comment and approves concurrence 1 cues of the specifications to assure that the QA requirements are included cod that the specifications have been through the required Supply System design review. De ign changes, ' including fielE! changes, are-subject to design control i, : ass;ures commensurate with those applied to the original design and are cyproved by the organization that performed the original design. Documentation pertaining to Design Control of Supply System Quality Class I precurement documents will become part of the objective evidence of the quality of the applicable items and will be filed and maintained in s

' trcreable, retrievable, systematic menner.

i o The details of the design control measures implemented by Ebasco and CE are d:ccribed in Subsections 17.1.2 and 17.1.3 respectively, Tha Supply Systen QA Program requires that Supply System and Ebasco generated 4 . procure;ent documents be reviewed and approved to verify that requirements have been included which provide for the development and implementation of a ) Quality Assurance Program for Supply System Quality Class I items and p activities which specifie=11y comply with 10CFR50. Appendix B criteria. In j cdditiot.Ithe contractors and vendors of Supply System Quality Class I iteasj i fand_ rec _ivities are required to have thei uality Assurance Program,compig,, M l with applicable parts of ANSI N45.2 and a

itionsi requirements as delinested 12 the procurement documents.

i The procurement documents specif that the contractors and vendors of Supply l System Quality Class I items,__ activities develop and implement design and int:rface control procedures.(which assureF "A" ( Jf ~ o) Translation of regulatory requirements.and design bases correctly into the design documents; b). Incorporation of appropriate quality standards with deviations and changes being controlled; c) Application of design control measure; d) Proper-design verification or checking methods such as design reviews, i alternate calculations, or qualification testing is performed. Where s l test program is used to verify the adequacy of a design, a qualification test of a prototype unit under the most adverse design l conditions vi - o-F. S", W** wup et ur.e u M pasAues ts nch ved Grcud<adoa ' : : 4e Emsrc% cA ny' nnewswii p a sdarvs. r " n 2 " %,"..a, 7j P c, wer

,* aq-n.1 p n -

. Twe desp hterb teeth'ot PVecedeOS ASCave. thL [ctledng*

17. l - 1 B n n

.s p3 l 27619-10 FSAR j j ~ f ~? e) Individuals or groups responsible for design verification or checking j are other than those who performed the original design; f) Design and specification changes, including field changes are subject f to the same controls applicable to the original design; n y 3). Design documents.and revisions thereto are distributed to responsible individuals in a timely manner and controlled to prevent inadvertent j use of superseded material; h) Errors and deficiencies which adversely affect safety-related structures, systems and components in the design process are documented j and that appropriate corrective action has been taken; n . ) c. i) . Design documents, des'ign revie'ws, records and changes thereto are collected, stored and maintained in a systematic and controlled manner; C j) . Standard "off the shelf" commercial or previously approved materials, i J parts and equipment (that are essential to the safety-related functions ~ of the structures, systems and components) are selected and reviewed for suitability of application. t 1) Supply System or Ebasco Generated Specifications and Drawings I 4 Supply System or Ebasco Engineering prepares' Client Comment, j s .1 Revised Client Comment and Bidding Docissents for WNP-3 in 1 ,/ accordence with all applicable Codes and Standards and QA Procedures utilizing angineering data generated from technical i memoraiduos, project criteria documents, SAR commitments and/or Supply System requirements. Calculations and specification data are independently reviewed and checked by engineers experienced in . the. appropriate engineering discipline. The Supply System or Zhasco Engineering prepares specifications and associated drawings which are reviewed and approved internally. The Client Comment Issue of AE prapared specifications and associated drawings are the,n sent to the Supply System for review and approval. Client Comment Issues are reviewed at the Supply System and are sosigned to a Reviewing Engineer for technical review and to QA, - l Licensing, Plant Management, and Project Management for their ] associated review. Each engineering discipline, as applicable, performs the technical review in accordance with Supply System l design revien procedures / instructions. Project Management is responsible for the overall review and approval of the Client Comment Issue. Project Engineering is responsible for the technical review and resolution of comments resulting from that review. ) ~ i 17.1-19 Amendment No. 4, (12/83)

' " D_ _ _s s ggy.3 '2761W-11 FSAR O For Ebasco generated specifications, the conusents are resolved ..) with Ebasco. Pages and drawings which are affected by Supply i System review are corrected by Ebasco and returned to the Supply System for concurrence. These pages and drawings are reviewed to assure that comments have been resolved and incorporated, and the original Supply System reviewers acceptance is secured on comments which have been rejected. Rejected comments which are not acceptable.will be resolved to the satisfaction of the Supply System. Bidding Documents are then asse[abled from the Revised Client Comment Issue and approved via sign off on the Bid Issue Approval . Sheet by-Project Management. .. e For Supply System generated specifications, the technical review is accomplished in a manner similar to Ebasco prepared l 3 specifications except the review, corrections and revisions are L between Supply System Corporate Engineering and Project Engineering. 2) Contractor and Vendor Generated Drawings and Specifications 4 When a contractor or a vendor initiates a design, he is required to perform design review activities in accordance with internal design review procedures which must include measures for -5 controlling design interfaces. Upon completion of this review,

I his design drawings and specifications are forwarded to Ebasco for interface review.

Ebasco conducts a review of the drawings and specifications in accordance with Ebesco procedures which includes sensures to control the receipt, approval and transmittal of vendor drawings and an approval of the procedures and specifications required to be submitted to Ebasco in accordance with the procurement { ' documents. j ,( l o Vendor drawings, specifications and other documents are transmitted to the Supply System staff in accordance with the contract submittal requirements. Supply System personnel review these transmittals on a selective basis and transmit any comments to Ebasco for inclusion. Supply System reviews of transmittals for Supply System direct purchases are performed in accordance with Corporate Procedures / Instructions. l % h 4 f 17 1 - to _. ~, u. ...,_--.~._i__ mes e n

= a. WNP-3 2763W-1 PSAR j 17.1.I.6 Procurement Document Control g Procurement of materials, parts, components and construction activities for j WNP-3 is accomplished through prepurchased equipment and construction specifications and contracts prepared by the Supply System or Ebasco for the Supply System. The award of contracts is based on an evaluation of bidder I proposals. Approval to award a contract is obtained from the Supply System 4 ~ Board of Directors and Executive Committee personnel. l Proposals which take exception to technical or quality requirements are 1 evaluated by Supply System Engineering, Ebasco Engineering, and/or Ebasco Home Office Engineering and/or QA, Ebssco Project QA and Supply System QA. i Exceptions to contracts must present acceptable alternatives to the I l specification requirements. The Supply System QA Program requires that the Supply System and Ebasco 3 develop and implement measures which assure that procurement documents are j l prepared, reviewed, approved and issued under controlled conditions. In l (, addition, addenda issued prior to bid opening and control change orders issued af ter i! bid awards, require a review and approval coimansurate to that performed on the 1 l original procurement document. These control measures were established and in effect prior to the writing of this document. These measures are described in l Subsections 17.1.2 and 17.1.3. i l l The Supply System QA Program requires that Supply System and Ebasco generated i procurement documents (excluding purchase requisitions and purchase orders) be 4 { j j) ' ~ reviewed and spproved by Supply Systeiii and Ebasco (of Ebasco generated) QA i personnel. T'.~ese reviews verify the inclusion of a licable quality l l requirements.)Theprocurementdocuments/fe%h' ""8% Osetors and vendors l of Supply System Quality Class I items @a"ve7a QA Program whichAs ~ App McaM q quA g g-p ] Q A 34nf, y M 9 $ 4 q % y;, ; -T =m. u _c w, g The Supply System QA Program requires that the Supply System and E sco ( generat'd procurement documents (excluding purchase requisitions and purchase j e orders) be reviewed and approved by Supply System and Ebasco (if Ebssco generated) Engineering personnel. These reviews verify the inclusion of applicable design, regulatory, code, material, testing, met;al joining, part identification, spare parts, cleaning, preservation, packag'ing, handling, storage, shipping, installation and other design procurement reisted j requirements. 1 Supply System generated purchase requisitions and purchase orders will be reviewed and approved by Supply System QA and Engineering in accordance with the Supply System QA Program. Ebasco generated purchase requisitions and j purchase orders will be reviewed and approved in accordance with measures established in Subsection 17.1.2. The Supply System will review j implementation of these measures by audits and surveillances. i The review and approval of Supply System and Ebasco generated procurement i documents is documented. This documentation is filed and maintained in a l controlled, traceable, retrievable and systematic manner. ) Documentation requirements are specifically delineated in the procurement 1 documents indicating to the bidder, contractors and vendors which documents must be submitted for information or approval. i 17.l?21 J 9ec 6 nt. L Nc _4.,.! M /' S.

l l '2765W-2* l d i Prccurement documents include requirements which assure the right of access by i Supply System and/or Ebasco personnel to the contractor's operations or the v:ndcr's facilities and records. QA requirements are incorporated in j prccurement documents in accordance with their quality class and complexity. 4 Biddsrs on Supply System Quality Class I documents are requested to submit j with their bids a comprehensive QA Plan describing their QA system, policies, a i r cponsibilities and procedures which will be, or are being, implemented to-i etatrol quality throughout all phases from design to final shi at er i .hete.g4 4 pe.11.e<o g e c<.... .e.,e _ g...u .hi. I pm,x.u.a w 5 Qthre, 'th m.twhcterV Mc/advadi.A de2/saw:4 ihWEWet C A Pre'7h A*d asser na.

s..f. pit uae. (

F j mritetia9 r*We,y*MW4 et. p m Sd.q.+ M 5ipsGA.Pih M W a@y@..u.z to determine d wpad. u.m.s , usas ar. thn acceptability of the bidder's QA prograns f This evaluation may consist of c ow+ rut. l l . an examination of their QA plans and evaluation of past quality performance j bancd on previous experience with the Supply System or Ebasco and/or a review cf the A/E bid ~ evaluations. QA evaluations, if deemed necessary, are 4 parfsraad in accordance with annraved orocedurgy. After the documented bid j .. cvaluation, the Supply SystenfPrei.ee Wan**e9 IB notified as to the 4 cec:ptability of the bidder's QA proar.m._. j m 'I wM 8f %s3 ram DMoD l Supply Systes QA reviews and approves ^1TeMtDiItacr4agi-_Vs and the NSSS l C:ntractor's respective QA program. The Architect-Engineer in turn approves tha QA programs of other contractor's and supplier's as pap _of their contract l with the Supply System. f 4 '[( w e,, l Th3 details of the procurement doctasent control asasures implemented by Ebases j cad CE are described in Subsections 17.1.2 and 17.1.3 respectively. ] i l 17.1.1.7 In'structions, Procedures and Drawings 4 Supply System Design and Construction Quality Assurance Requirements Manual d211cestas the methods by which the Supply System complies with the criteria cf 10CFR50, Appendix B. Implementation of Supply Systes QA Program assures c:strol of the activities affecting quality. A listing'of the QA procedures comprising Supply System Design and Construction Quality Assurance Esquirements Naanal is recorded in Subsection 17.1.1.4. t i Th3 Supply Systen QA Program requires Ebasco to have based the hevelopment of their QA Program and the procedures for its implementation on the requirements of 10CF150, Appendix B. Ebasco generated procurement documents require that instructions, procedures and drawings relative to the work being performed a vill be maintained in the work area and.available for reference by the 4 personnel performing the work. C:ntractors and vendors, including Ebasco and CE, are required to have written instructions, procedures, policies and/or drawings which govern their quality [ r31sted activities and which include appropriate quantitative and qualitative ace:ptance/ rejection criteria. Contractors and vendors, including Ebasco and CE, cre required to impose similar documentation requirements on their subecatractors. Tha details of the asasures which Ebasco and CE implement to assure the d:valopment and issuance of instructions, procedures and drawings are d:ccribed in Subsections 17.1.2 and 17.1.3 respectively. j n.-n-

.m r -b ~ 276317-3 WNP-3 PSAR p 4 6 bdN M7 17 1 cid~ Document Conerel Document Control is implemented by the Supply System, Ebasco and CE in accordance with the requirements delineated in their respective QA Manuals. I These requirements provide measures to assure that appropriate written instructions, procedures, policies, drawings and procurement documents ) ,. including changes thereto,, are properly reviewed and approved prior to release.- Changes to these applicable documents require a review and/or approval commensurate to that performed on'the original document. Changes to design documents ace described in Subsection 17.1.1.5. These reviews and/or 1 approvals verify the inclusion. of adequata quality requirements and evaluate 4 the impset of the changes on other project activities. Issuance of controlled l documents is performed by personnel assigned distribution authority by the QA j .- Program. This controlled. issuance is designed to distribute controlled s documents in a timely manner to the locations where the applicable activity is. being performed and to prevent the use of obsolete or, superseded documents. 1 8 The Supply System QA Program provides for the controlled updating of the l Supply System Design and Construction Quality Assuranca Requirements Manual i through a process that specifically requires holders of a control. led copy of the Supply Systaa,% Program Manual to return a receipt verifying that the manual has been updated, the superseded peges were removed and returned and/or destroyed. r Procurement documents generated.by-the Supply Systaa, Ebasco and CE require j that contractors and vendors, including their subcontractors, of Supply Systes 4 y , ) Quality Class I itaasMjeusent control procedures in accordance with ) j 10CFR50, Appendix 3. T. 'Intplsensub The Supply Systes QA Program document control measures, as delineated in the i procurement documents, requires that quality related documentation be l available prior to the performance of the activity to which they relate. The iupply Systea QA Program document control, measures pertain as a miniinsa to j j contract specifications, contract drawings, % Program Manual procedures, y operating procedures, quality related instructions and various process, test l i and inspection procedures as delineated in the contract kpacifications. The details of the document control measures implemented by Ebasco and CE are i d described in Subsections 17.1.2 and 17.1.3 respectively. I 17.1,1b Control of Purchased Meterial. Equipment and Services j j I i As described in Subsection 17.1.1.6, procurement for WNP-3 is accomplished through procurement documents. These documents contain sections which describe the general conditions, special conditions and technical I specifications which the contractor is required to meet. The requirements of these sections assure purchased material, equipment and services, whether purchased directly or through contractors, conforms to design requirements. Measures to control these activities include a review and approval of procurement documents; source evaluation,and s&lection, vendor surveillance, inspections and audits by the Supply System or Ebasco; and receiving ) inspection of these items upon receipt at the sita. } i h i QA requirements are incorporated in procurement documents in accordance with [ l i l 17.I-2.3 l

Gi _v P 7-~ 'x ~" E n c1] WNP-3 SQJGl7 i 1763W-4', PSR H 1 Bidders on the Supply System Quality l th:1r quality class and complexity. l Cic0c I contracts are required to submit with their bids a comprehensive QA plce describing their QA systems, policies, responsibilities and procedures which will be, or are being implemented to control quality throughout all phasco from design to final shipse r on a n at

odc, Het ar e m un_

n=14 cableg+ pre < wswddocumewts uire1me confruteryI d O

• • E W M*

l its m Ic'r4 heGM Jilc'r e, wWh!6WuA d2 merebrestve, pA PW_ % NT,r(@, surveillance of contractors and vendors = yy47 oy m. , m.. .. w 4 i be performed in accordance with written procedures and that surveillance j cetivities be. planned to verify and document that. the contractors and vendors are conforming to the requirements of the procurement documents. In cddition, the Supply System QA Program requires that receiving inspection cf items at the~ site 'be performed in accordance with written procedures, and th:t receiving inspection activities be planned to verify and document that for the material, equipment or component being received documentation is l cvailable at the site prior to installation or use. ! t Th3 Supply System QA Program requires that received items will be stored and ha:dled on a controlled basis with nonconforming items being processed in ccesrdance with the requirements described in Subsection 17.1.1.17. i Documentation pertaining to the control of purchased material, equipment and A l cervices will become part of the objective evidence of the quality of the opplicable items and will be filed and maintained in a traceable, retrievable systematic manner. ,3 1 The details of the measures which Ebasco and CE implement to assure the csstrol of purchased material, equipment and services are described in Sub:cetions 17.1.2 and 17.1.3 respectively. L i 17.1.1.10 Identification and Control of Materials, Parts and Components The Supply System QA Program requires that Supply System and Ebasco generated procurement documents contain requirements for the development and implementation of measures for the identification and control of meterials, l parto and components. These reviews and approvals assure that identification cid marking requirements have been adequately delineated and that the location I cud method of identification and marking do not adversely effect the function or gus11ty of the subject ites. Prceurement documents require a positive system of identification and control cf materials, parts, components and partially completed subassemblies while in otsrage, warehousing and holding areas and during their fabrication, merufacturing, installation and construction. There identification and control measures establish a means by which items can be traced to and conformance verified with their applicable documentation. l Vari *ication that the items have been properly identified is to be performed l duri.g vendor surveillance activities prior to shipment of the items. Id:stification is further verified during receiving inspection at the site to ( cccure that identification ' status was not adversely affected during shipping j cod to provide a verification' check if the vendor surveillance verification l c'co waived. 8 .l = - -. - - - = =-

re _. n _ WNP-3 Q 2,76 E FSAR ' Documentation pertaining to the identification and control of materials, parts and components will become part of the objective evidence of the quality of the applicable items and will be filed and maintained in a traceable, retriew bie, systematic manner. i The details of the measures which Ebasco and CE implement to assure the identification and control of materials, parts and components are described in Subsections.17.1.2 and 17.1.3 respectively. l 17.1.1.11 control of Special Processes. ,, 4 The Supply System QA Program requires that' opply~ System and Ebasco generated procurement documents contain requirementsfwhich provide for the development and implementation of measures,for the control of special processer. These requirements specify applicabla codes, standards, ' specifications and any special requirements necessary for the control of the delineated special processes. 3 In.eddition, the procurement documents specify that specisi processes will be performed and controlled in' accordance with written procedures which delineate 4 those special. processes.$rocedures WHEET111 be submitted to Ebasco oQupply System for information or review asd comments. 4 D i Theprocurementdocumentswillgekuh6thatproceduresbedevelopedtocontrol L such special processes ast f wb d NS M l a,p we g,tf**'"y Ma.che deucJe et i j, a) welding g g,4n3 work. % E.bc.seds G A Praym* Aad 3 pfer. tomdihj procedures vv.WEr -tb b h b) Cleaning cm CAP <eym M PY'"*S ' c) Heat Treating d) , Nondestructive Examination e) Repairing Essential ingredients of these procedures shall include: i ( 4 a) Equipment utilized in the performance, inspection and control of special processes that require qualification shall be qualified to its intended usage prior to being installed or used. b) Personnel performing any special processes shall be qualified in accordance with applicable standards prior to the performance of work, ^ c) Data collected in conjunction with the control of special processes shall include the type of operation, results, acceptability, action taken when deficiencies were noted and the identification of.the i inspector and/or data recorded. Special processes procedures, qualification documentation, inspection and test l results will become part of the objective evidence of the quality of the C applicable item and will be filed and nr.intained in a traceable, retrievable, systematic manner. a s

._~ _.

• 2 Scd (o71f 2763W-6 FSAE

'V-4An 2 Th; je ails of the measures which Ebasco and CE implement to assure a r'J " ol of special processes are described in Subsections 17.1.2 an I rcep:ctively. 17.1.1.12 Inspection l Th3 Supply System QA Program requires that Supply System and Ebasco generated 5 procurement documents contain requiraments which provide for the development cod implementation of inspection measures. These requirements specify that i is pections will be performed by' contractor 4 personnel. who are independent from l ~formin the activity being tha individual or group responsible for r incpected. 4.'66u,gutJih Th3 procurement documents specify that inspection activities will be performed j crd controlled in accordance with written procedures, instructions and/or } c checklists.,These procedures, instructions and/or checklists are required to 1 include: e " c) Identification of quality characteristics to be inspected. l b) Identifiestion of those contractor individuals or the organization responsible for performing the inspection operation. 0 c) Acceptance / rejection criteria. .d) Description of the method of inspection. M. o) Evidence of completion of inspection. f) Record of the results of the inspection operations. Tha procurement documents further require that procedures, instructions and .decwings relative to the work being performed will be maintained in the work crea and available for. reference by the personnel performing the work. 0/ MG36dre+ [ Contractors and vendors are reauired by the frocurement doc nts t specify the qualification requirements for inspection personnel and to Isssure that occh.inspeety's gualifications are maintained current. The contractors and vend $rDa5hfuT$ Net required to perform inspection of modifications, repairs ord replacement items, which are made after the initial inspections, in a 1 manner commensurate with the original inspection requirements or to the Supply j System and/or Ebasco approved alternatives. Inspection equipment is required to be calibrated as described in Subsection f 17.1.1.14 Eb :co has been delegated the responsibility to perform source inspection, Qgap 3as gugE G sita receiving inspection of prepurchag*W5 N5" % *** t P'rh 5^** #r # LI.M I*' WisiH aa[5 E tInet4aa 4 a =~ " aa d h c J m yte w ti j Do,gJtGM s<' 6Lhsctw W twe. cr.urr-ctor, perfor,ms wc<g e Oaxo GA Pr Y ?nY & Y-YnYs e intpection of Supply System direct purchases. The Supply System has and may cc ame responsibility for source inspection / site receiving inspection of Ebasco administered prepurchased items / services. f 17.1-26 Amendment No. 4, (12/83) l -.~.7

m._ m -- _ 2763W-7 FSAR. r 5 CW [d77 j g Pre-inspection planning for prepurchased vendors developed by Ebasco QA will define inspection requirements, sequence of inspections, inspection methods, acceptance criteria and provide a tabulation of results for documented evidence that the particular quality characteristic inspected actually conforms to the specifications. TheSupplySystenQAwillperformsurve111anceSonbpplySystemdirec 4 procurements and perform an overview of the CM and contractor organizations 4 for the purposes of evaluating their performance and verification of implementation of corrective action. Sourceinspection[villbeaccomplishedjhEbasea'svendorsurveill'ncegroup a 4 i using inspection plans developed by Supply System and Ebesco from the procurement documents.. This inspection will assure adequate control of f processes to assure that the required quality is obtained when inspection is 1 not possible or disadvantageous. ] The NSS3 Supplier (CE) is responsible for source surveillance of its I subvandors. The Supply System will provide surveillance, through the Bone 4 Office and Site Organizations, over both 3 and its subvendors. 3 I Inspection planning data sheets will become part of the objective evidence of 1 ( the quality of the applicable items inspected and will be filed and maintained in a traceable, " retrievable, systenstic manner'. \\ l The details of the inspection seasures implemented by Zbasco and 3 and 3 described in Subsections 17.1.2 and 17.1.3,. respeerively. .) i 1 i, i 1( ~ 1 i d 1 ) A i l ~ .17.1-27 Amendment'No. 4, (12/83) ll m_.. . q. -

w- -- _ : ~ - - -

• ~

SQJ 6 77 2762Wal-FSR li.1.1.13 Test control The Supply System QA Program requires that Supply System and Ebasco generated \\ prscurement documents contain requirements governing tests to be performed by j vsudors and contractors. The test requirements shan include adequate test { pr3 requisites, instructions for testing (including environmental conditions, i if cpplicable), proper instrumentation, documentation and evaluation by qualified, responsible individual or group. - The procurement-documents require j that testing be performed in accordance with written procedures, instructions and/or plans which define the overan inspection and test requirements, the l cce:ptance/ rejection criterta and the data to be recorded. Th3 Supply System QA Program further requires that site testing be monitored in cecordance with testing inspection plans which' provide for { e c) An itemized list of the status identification system to be employed ( (i.e., tags, numbering system). ) , [ b) An itemized list of the documents to be reviewed or referenced to 3 verify the testing and inspection status of the system or component to j s be tested. c) An itemized list of the tests to be performed, i d) An itemized list of the testing devices to be utilized. o) A detailed list of acceptance criteria together with adequate space to j reflect actual results. g4 Construction testing vill be. performed by the contractor to ensure that w 4 installed equipment meets applicable codes, standard dd requirements. i imp W ch _ a. s.4w.c s The contractors wn 1 be required to prepare aspec procedures which define overall inspection and test requirements test equipment to be_ used, criteria for acceptance and data to be recorded.-1These plansJahan be gg q k cpproved by Ebasco. Integrity tests (i.e., hydrostatic, continuity,

pacwams, I

raciscance,,ete, and flushing tests) win be performed in accordance with there approved procedures. The contractor will be required to provide control a cf installed equipment in accordance with ja, accepted equipment tagging i procedure. Upon completion of(contractocinstallation and testing of a given sy tem, an associated inspection and test records will be cursed over to Eberco and the Supply System for review and concurrence. ) System inspections win be performed by the Supply System Startup Group to 3 l ensure that equipment is instan ed in accordance with design requirements and l .that the system installation is complete. Fo nowing resolution of any dicerepancies, contractor tags 11 be removed, Supply System tags installed cad control of the system vil n be transferred to the Supply System for j tecting purposes. @ntracto#Te'st documentation win become a part of the 2 cvarall permanent plant testing records. o Toct control documentation will become part of the objective envidence of the ) i quality of the applicable items tested and win be filed and maintained in a tr:ceable, retrievable and systematic.nanner. d Th3 details of the test control measures implemented by Ebasco and CE are s d:ceribed in Subsections 17.1.2 and 17.1.3 respectively. y o i . -e-L%. A U 2]P'tt.~ m28 9 _ _ Aunt

.m 1-..L_ '11 ~ ..T ~ 1 WNP-3 h(h (O77 h ~ ~ 2762W-2 FSR g I '17.1.1.14 control of Measuring and Test Eeuipment d m-Ma l I ~ The Supply System QA Program requires tha upp y System andIEbasco generated procurement documents contain requirementsfwhich (provide for h:he development and implementation of measures to control measuring and testTi[uipment. These requireme_uts specify: k {(. _ _ ., : B Contractor's and vendor's] rocedures describe the calibration a) technique, calibration frequency, maintenance and control'of'all f l measuring and test instruments, tools, gauges, fixtures, reference 1 4 standards, transfer standards, and nondestructive examination equipment which are to be used in the measurement, inspection and monitoring of components, systems and structures. { ~b) ' Allowable defiations from calibration standards (tolerancais)'will be specified in thelcontractor's =ad==ador's] procedures. c A Inspection, mea & suring, testing and maintenance devices are calibrated f c) 1 and adjusted at scheduled intervals against certified standards having 1 known valid relationships to national standards, when such standards i exist. I d) Calibration intervals for each device are based on the type of equipment, required accuracy, intended usage and other conditions 4 affecting inspection, measurement, testing and maintenance control, e) Calibration standards are maintained, calibrated and used in an i j environment having temperature and humidity controls that are j compatible with required. accuracy and operating characteristics of the 4 standards. f) Records are saiticained that indicate the calibration history and the next acheduled calibration date for each controlled device. g) Each inspection, measuring, testing and maintenance device is properly identified with serial numbers, or other suitable identification and has its last and next scheduled calibration dates clearly indicated. ( h) Devices that have not been properly maintained or calibrated in accordance with specified schedules have been identified and removed l from service. )

• f i)

An investigation will be conducted and documented to determine the validity of previous inspections performed when measuring and test equipment are found to be out of calibration. f i Documentation pertaining to the control of measuring and test equipment will become part of the objective evidence of the quality of the applicable items and will be filed and maintainsd in a traceable, retrievable and systematic h manner. j m i 17.1-29 Amendment No. 4, (12/83) . 7.-

m?.U.r.e.,ees. < eraeew s f ^' '%endM ^' ~ WNP-3 .2762W-3, FSR $( M77 Tho details of the measures which Ebasco and CE implement to assure the enntrol of measuring and test equipment are described in Subsections 17.1.2 cod 17.1.3 respectively, i 17.1.1.15 Handling, Storage, Shinning and Preservation The Supply System QA Program requires that Supply System and Ebasco generated procurement documents contain requirements which provide for the development cod implementation of appropriate cleaning, preservation, handling, storage shipping and preservation measures. Thnse requirements specify that procedures will be developed based on the requirements of the procurement documents, with consideration to the need for cpscial tools, equipment and qualified personnel. Cleaning, preservation, handling, storage, shipping and preservation rcquirements are incorporated into the procurement documents to assure that i tha ites's designed integrity and ability to function are maintained. Items delivered to the site are stored, handled and preserved in accordance with procurement documents and equipment manufacturer's requirments. Manufacturer's instructions may be modified provided adequate engineering justification is provided and documented. These functions are performed in ccesrdance with approved procedures and instructions on a scheduled basis and 4 estreetive action is taken when required. The overall prograa' is under the curveillance of Ebasco's Site QA., .] Documentation pertaining to tbs cleaning, preservation, handling, storage and M shipping of the items will become part of the objective evidence of the l quality of the applicable items and will be filed and maintained in a trcceable, retrievable and systematic manner. Th3 details,of the measures which Ebasco and CE implement to assure control of tb3 cleaning, preservation, handling, storage and shipping of the items are deceribed in Subsections 17.1.2 and 17.1.3 respectively. 17.1.1.16 Inspection, Test and operating Status M m Tho Supply Systen QA Program requires that Supply System and Ebasco generated procurement documents contain requirements which provide for the development cid implementation of inspection, test and operating tus measures. These rsquirements specify that procedures will be develope o assure that, cpecified inspections and tests are performed and that the acceptabili the items with regard to their inspection, test and operating status own throughout the manufacturing, installation and startup testing phases. 85 cddition, the procedures are required to specifically delineate the methods by which the inspection, test and operating status of an ites will be identified cad the controls which will be implemented to control the use of the idcatification methods. The taplementation of the status identification syates 'will be designed to preclude the inadvertent bypassing of required inspections or tests, unless formally waived, and to prevent the inadvertent s operation of the equipment. N / r?. I - 30 = + ~

f l WNP-3 5cM M 7 rs= 292*-4 ,' Docume'ntation pertaining to the inspection, test and operating status of items will become part of the objective evidence of the quality of the applicable items, and will be filed and maintained in a traceable, retrievable and y systematic manner. j l i The details of the measures which Ebasco and CE implement to assure g implementation of an inspection, test and operating status system are q described in Subsections 17.1.2 and 17.1.3 respectively. 1 17.1.1.17 Nonconforming Materials and Items I -iwielesnedad b I The Supply Systes QA l Program requires ( that Supply System and Ebasco generated procurement documents be reviewed and approved to verify that requirements j d have been included wh. ch provide for the development and implementation of measures to,==- & -ro_ trol of nonconforming materials and items. The Quality-u l Assurance Progr N Lhe Supply System, Ebasco, CE, other contractors, subcontractors and vendors will provide for the identification, documentation, segregation, review, disposition and notification to affected organization of i nonconforming materials, parts, components, services or other prograa , activities at any stage of manufacturing, fabrication, erection, or construction to prevent thair inadvertent use or installation. Written procedures will provide for the handHng, processing, dispositioning and reinspection of nonconforming materials, parts, components, services or other j program activities. i Nonconforming items shall be identified and marked with a'" HOLD" tag (when g ) possible); removed to a " ELD" area, roped off or otherwise segregated to 4 prevent their inadvertent use or installation. 1 0 J 17.1.1.17.1 Detectioh and Documentation of Nonconformances .The detection'and documentation of nonconformances detected is' as follows ( 17.1.1.'17.1.1 Site Nonconformances I All Supply System project personnel shall have the authority to either issue a Hold Tag or assure that"the appropriate Contractor / Supplier issue its Hold Tag to stop work or control further processing of nonconforming itea(s) which may be in direct violation of he following: 3 A i AN j a) The.FSAR b) Engineering; construction, or material specifications l c). Applicable codes and standards d) Projact Quality Assurance Procedures a) Contractor's Quality Assurance Procedures I h ' If determined to be a nonconformance it will be documented in accordance with an approved procedure.' Site nonconformances detected by the Supply System, Ebasco, and those nonconformances detected by construction contractors which j require Owner /AE dispositions are processed by Ebasco in accordancia with the l QA program described in Subsection 17.1.2. Ebasco's QA program describes the T dispositioning process including the criteria which requires approval of the j Nonconformance Review Eoard (NRB); and the membership of the NRB, which includes Supply System Project Engineering. 17.1-31 A W = nt No. 4, (12/83)

T - --- ~ - m .____.w. .m WNP-3 2762W-5 FSAR ScA v77 17E1.1.17.1.2 Vendor Nonconformances N:ne nforming material, parts, components, services, or other program cetivities detected by Supply System and/or Ebasco during vendor surveillance cctivities will be brought to the attention of the Vendor's Quality Assurance paraconel for their initiation of conconformance control using their precedure. Failure of the vendor to take appropriate actions will result in j opprcpriate corrective actions initiated by the Supply System or Ebasco. N:nctnformances detected during fabrication / manufacturing by the vender will be identified and controlled in accordance with the vendor's QA program. All vender nonconformances dispositioned "Use-ee-is" or " Repair" are made part of I tha permanent inspection records and reported to the Supply System in cecardance with contract requirements and the v.endor's QA program. ~ Pf. {.i. I T. f. ~ ~ ~~ 7 [ System Nonconformances (Quality Finding Reports) f kate[knJ6 en established to assure quality discrepancies g F t. concerning documentation, procedures, instruction or program activities !F are identified, documented and corrected and that notification of action taken is transmitted to affected parties. JMesas W[e. 17.1.1.17. Review of Nonconformances .aMhshd to assore.o s 4 (Ebarco QA is resnonsible h assuring}that nonconformance documents generated by the Supply System, vendors, contractors or Ebasco, which identify' ,N cignificant or possibly significant deviations as outlined in 10CFR50.55(e) or -1 10CFR21, have been properly evaluated and processed. A Tha details of the measures which Ebasco and CE implement to assure the ,ctntrol of nonconforming materials, parts or components are described in Sub:ections 17.1.2 and 17.1.3 respectively. ~ 17 J ;.18 Corrective Action Tha Supply Systen QA Program requires that Supply System and Ebasco generated procurement documents contain requirements which provide for the development c:d implementation of measures to assure that conditions adverse to quality 1 cro identified, evaluated, corrected, documented and reported to the { cppropriate levels of management. In addition, the cause of significant conditions adverse to quality are required to be identified, evaluated, i ccrrected to preclude repetition, documented and reported to the appropriate 1cvels of management. l 1 l Tha procurement documents require the contractor or vendor to take timely c rrective action unen requested by the Supply System and/or Ebasco. This i requirement is in addition tojitneir ovo3groceduresfor implementing corrective / cetion.fuhich the procuremeng ts_apIbiyLp l Wtretcc eMo r Documentation pertaining to corrective act ons will become part of the cbj:ctive evidence of the quality of the applicable items and will be filed and maintained in a traceable, retrievable, systematic manner. -J l i

17. 1:32 Amendment.No._4, (12/_83)

p.- - - - - 1_ - - - T -~ R _, a _.- \\ = WNP-3 Sed [77) ,,/. 2762W-6 FSAR l Scal 66Z ) \\ .The details of the corrective action measures implemented by Ebasco and CE are 'h. described in Subsections 17.1.2.and 17.1.3 respectively. 17.1.1.19 Quality Assurance Records j The Supply System QA Program requires that Supply System and Ebasco generated procurement documents contain requirements which provide for the development i and implementation of measures to assure that documentation necessary to provide objective evidence of the activites affecting quality are generated, reviewed, approved, filed and maintained in accordance with Appendix 3 of 1 id 4kne-es dA Pa mad p ane.dl [wwe h ' N =c j ,' wdl k w n cc w ocuremen locuments hat contractors or von ors: l a) Have' written sea o control. the filing and retrieval of QA Racords. b) Have QA records which provide sufficient information to permit identification between the records and the item or activity to which ( they apply, f c) Have QA records which are legible, complete and authenticated and dated by authorized personnel. j d) Maintain control over the QA records to assure that revisions are j 4 performed by authorized personnel under controlled. conditions in l w accordance with written procedures. Revisions will include the date of 1 the revision and identification of the person making the revision. J e) Maintain their QA records in a retrievable, identifiable and systematic

menner, f)

Have their QA records accessible for review by the Supply System and/or Ebasco. g) Have QA record storage facilities which are constructed and located to prevent destruction by fire, flooding, or thef t and to prevent 1 deterioration from temperature or humidity conditiogs. Ebasco has been given the responsibility to receive, store and maintain QA records for the Supply System at the site. QA records will be kept at the site in a storage facility constructed and located to prevent the contents from being destroyed by fire, flooding or theft, or d humidity conditions.7M 51 Pore 'kK/6 I h.1*has,M,eterioration by temperspre T J,% M df beengiventheresponsIbilitytoreviewQArecorps.s L a P/ W m m #E W Ey '"' V L to assure their Ebasco correctness and completeness. QA records shall be submitted to Ebasco in accordance with the requirements of the procurement documents. QA recceds are utilized to verify that activities affecting quality have occurred, and that they have been performed in compliance with specified requirements. Analysis-I of conditions adverse to quality are performed as indicated in Subsections 17.1.1.17 and 17.1.1.18. These analyses utilize QA records as one j means of disclosing discrepancies and nonconforming conditions. Furthermore, QA records provide the basis upon ubich dispositioning and verification of resolutions are accomplished. l ~/, i -- 33 .. ~ _ ___.._ -.e. u _ -

Y n_ 3 l i $( d 67 *y WNP-3 2762W-7 FSAR . Safety-related equipment will not be installed until it is assured that the ensite documentation for that equipment does meet the applicable specification and/or code requirements, or that a certification, stating this documentation is available and will be furnished and signed by an authorized representative of the manufacturer, is received and acceptable. In the event that neither the complete documentation package or adequate certification is available, or hardware deficiencies exist, but exceptional construction or handling considerations justify that safety-related equipment be stored in place or installed, the following conditions shall be met: c) An engineering evaluation will be made to determine the degree of risk associated with storing in place or installing such equipment. b) As the engineering evaluation dictates, management will determine whether the equipment will simply be stored in place or whether it may be set in place, aligned, bolted, grouted and connected. The decision l will be documented and any hold points or limitations clearly identified in accordance with approved CM procedures. Any equipment so t installed will be properly tagged regarding degree of nonconformance and in no case will such equipment be placed in service or used for any preoparational testing until the nonconformance conditions are rectified and such is documented. The details of the Quality Assurance record measures that are implemented by Ebasco and CE are described in Subsections l7.1.2 and 17.1.3 respectively. 17.1.1.20 Audits _ N_ _ The Supply Syst A Program requires tractorf ndors and their . cubcontractors o develop and implement a comprehensive system of planned and i documented audits These audit activities are required to be performed in cecordance with itten procedures or_ checklists _. _ Audit measuresJ r_e t_o essure that: Ehiiase MLL 2edslop and i6ple s#%;facd& ~ ~ i,EasdMed,,,,/g4 JMd nair sa4contreckers wecit.A. besco's Progre c) Audits are phraed b'y appropr ate y t aine7 persoTneI~not nav ng responsibility in the areas being audited. b) Audits are conductef periodically based on a preplanned schedule. t c) Audits include an objective evaluation of quality related practices, procedures, instructions, work areas, activities items and documentation. In addition, audits include an evaluation of the effectiveness of implementing compliance to specified requirements. i d) Audit results are documented and reported to the appropriate levels of management who review and evaluate these reports to determine quality trends and program effectiveness. l e) Management action is taken to correct deficient areas. f) Follow-up audits are performe d to verify corrective action and to evaluate the effectiveness of implementation. i 17.1-34 A=endment !;o. 4, (12/83) i ~ -

1 2 SC;J 6 7 7

• 2 f

,l 2762W-8 FSAR h -)

• Audits determine the adequacy of, and adherence to, the Supply System, Ebasco g

/ fM other contractors QA programs and the effectiveness of their d implementation. This is determined by: a) The Director, Licensing and Assurance, and the Project QA Manager review reports of audits performed by the Supply System's Corporate QA on Ebssco Home Offica and WNP-3 organizations; NSSS Home Office, and Supply System. b) The Project QA Manager reviews reports of audits performed by Ebasco i and Supply System Site QA on Ebasco, contractor and vendor activities, j Each applicable criteria of 10CFR50, Appendix B, is scheduled to be audited by 1 ] Ebasco in accordance.with the. program described in Subsection 17.1.2. The. Manager, Audits is responsible for auditing the AE/CM and Supply System site ~( organizations performing quality affecting activities for compliance to the j applicable critaris of 10CFR50, Appendix 3. Supply System project QA will y conduct unscheduled audits on the AE/CM and contractor activities as necessarry. f i I The Supply System audit results are documented and reported to the appropriate levels of management for implementation of corrective action. The responses to the Supply System audit findings are verified for implementation and l effectiveness during follow-up audits. Documentation pertaining to audits will become part of the objective evidence j h of quality of the applicable items and will be filed and maintained in a j j traceable, retrievable, systematic manner. The detail of the audit activities implemented 'by Ebasco and CE are described in Subsections 17.1.2 and 17.1.3, respectively. 1 j i i ( a 1 i j 2 i l 3 e n. l - 3r l m, x

- - -- n L - - M_a. x am a./_x %-#w=a y 2867W-1 WNb3 PSAR 17.1.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION - ESASCO SERVICES 1I The Ebasco Quality Assurance Program for WNP-3 is fundamentally the same as the Ebasco Corporate Quality Assurance Program which is in ETR 1001 "Ebasco i Quality Assurance Program Manual." The Nuclear Regulatory Commission initially approved Ebasco Report err 1001, Revision 0, March 14,1975, as a Topical Quality Assurance Program on May 12, 1975. Subsequent corporate modifications to ETR 1001 are included in the project unique version on a regular-basia f allowing review and approval of the Nuclear Regulatory o Commission, e.g., Revis to EIR 1001 was accepted onGay 17, 19817 s 2., h 29,1984 5 Due to specific site and project requirements, departures from the corporate i Quality Assurance Program as established in Er1 1001 are necessary. These modifications are considered superficial in nature and are included in the i

==nnm1 only as clarification; for specific ~ site needs, 'e.g., project unique titles. Such changes to ETE 1001 are controlled in accordance with Company Procedure Number Seven. Ebasco considers that these changes do not downgrade the established requirements of the Ebasco Corporate Quality Assurance Program 3 ' [ as applied to the WNP-3 Project. Each page of the WNP-3 project unique ETR f-1001 is clearly identified as modified for the project. l i s, ] i h &77 i( l l d ~~ 3 J l i 1 17.1-36 Amendment No. 5, (6/84) _l y,. _ _ _, .n _f.,,. 7

a c.a wa.. = - 5 4 } 2N2 Cyp.3 rSa s. 17.1.3 QUALITT ASSURANCE DURING NSSS DESIGN AND PROCUILW.ENT - COMBUSTION ENGINEERING j The Combustion Engineering (NSSS Vendor) Quality Assurance Program is detailed in T=;u.:. agua ;;= 2^1, "- L:i= 2, -;;== -' 4 '-*'=v A-*-^ f no--L. :. ',.57 7.- CEssAR-F Chapter (7 i i 4 s i 9 1 L j I I V l l l l NM i 1 q i i I i k { d 1 4 l 1 SoJ (ols 7 l sl l l 17.1-37 Amendment No. 5, (6/84) I l

~ ' - - N... / [ [j (.) ' L/ rd 1 a s :g m-m n > d j,$ MANAGING DIRECTOR L "hf QE DEPUTY g MANAGING DIRECTOR ]g qgu c --fEGHNICAL Dinmmo 'j"m g,n 2 ?m! .g \\/ ~ \\ / -4 2 Lk L IN L U A /1 A A A A A A A 11 A A 2 A AA/ AU ING C -v vv-vvv - v vv vvvvr 7,;! i. C NS M A R \\

7. -

~ (k33tSTAnfrM W} I \\ 5 pptEtrok fat 8 l l l titleel5 f j Das0EC.7DR of F.Mr,angetsaig @OWER-LICENSING & w. PROJECTS ~. m 4ENERATIOft l ASSURANCE DIRECTOR -94 RECTOR-i- 6 ECTG b DlRECTOR o 4. m ^ ^ A ] " L' $%%%L^,^ ^ ^ ^. v'v,v % ^ ^ ^ A ' A L t,^, N ' ll'^ \\ / 1 E U N AD IST ATION SUPPORT CHIEF l R RCES &INF ATION SERVICES c: FINANCIAL SER l ES OFFICER .O Di QTOR DI C R DIRECTOR C / \\ / \\ [;i j i e s' x 23 9

j d

I N a i s e A

,I ,4 i, a 'r [. l

I

,hf [- / R ~ S E ~y T G 'I I D A U N A A ^ M g E C g N g Y A T M EF R AO S F ~ x R T 6 N E d C w G P T g WA A

• = p J

N-C E 4 g EYC R O g ER J TNE g g RM ITYC OI A G CTN E RL R A At A G PA gOS 4~ e A I U N U L US RA R A I 3U S A I U N POS M ~ T U 5 S S A N A A g ~ ~ N QS M W p g ~ O A g D C N E l_ AC R G N O N A TC R I E S U NS R I ES D /. CA R IL L A E T a k AES E C R N E N CM R LY N E A YC R TN E E CT A G L A G O N A G NF R A PL I UE R A A R I I T R A I AU N 3A U N G N S S A PU S A ~ 3 A U O A N A W A F S M NOS M RS ESR M W PAP O 4 m M GN Y S R I R N T RS C E OM E G E C JA E TA G IL ON AR A I RA I LG N 3P PM UO A N G R' 4 EP M W R M %Oe a l*EE*5 5i- ) a . 5= A ( 2g 8"E4N3Cn w 5 $i - 4 r ogf 5 t0 gzM 0g w o 2 a0 $.l V i 2cD. k 7o l w o j 2a>r y. } E$!" li W i [i! ? il .11li: ]q

l-.

!!i ji!eif +*I 'if -i!.

i*

-Q -- ~e. - v-7 i 2 a g f. g! l=$ L ' I, g 3 .2 nl{tgQlz L WNP-3 PROORAM y 4 PROGR'AM l! $@w DIRECTOR ! "jQlgt If it "

17. l.' l. 2. l aY

\\ / rPeoTecT s + 1 OUALITY t A ASSURANCE , f d {1_ g '_ - M MENT M ER g,,fpgAGER / \\ \\ 1 s / k Pb IC FAIRS L L S F INFO ATION A OR EY a 8 M A i \\ { / \\ P ****1 i"& ...,g T a ,l-E. ,Ro C. E.ol..ER,NO. CO OL. - g RESOURCES CONSTRUCTION d n.i.u.$ LAGER M/ A ER MA C TROL ER MANAGER n.i.u.s lg t / r - \\- -- r ~ ~ ^ ucha seg ' 3 l Am nur i farotos % sv.uened p T Prozcr Q9ff,1)., HAr Mosm Hn9Asee-s N WMiE gme-su4 gArJ/Merc in 8 ' 2,q ) s - i ' ' 2 =~ g gI ti7.1.12 7 g pi 3. i. i.2 4 l .m .m

/ typists men reCests- ; f, o t (C U L

1. M SCd (c'7'7

) ENoluttap40 rNoJtCrM ANAo McNr ouAuf f A15uMANCL eu.un e aaiu.. d' g assiviesta [ r - - '- ~. - - ~~ - - T - - -- -- - - - - - - ~~T-----r--'-'-------'- [ I Y I i l l l {' l g PN0JLCT MANAGEMLNT g I l 'b l 'I' g l l 8 3 g l l Dt M esneonus l Guatoryantwaanst I I L a "" " l PADJECT Ana ENolNEERING + - - - - g l QUAT 4TV ASSUAANCE esatist contax i l l I a= a a W e,, eco l l ACTscITlES g l- - - -=- - - CONSIAUCT40N --g---e l 6'I l I l 8 L M IC(04 l l SITE COH5f AUCT40N AUOlinN4 Seit GA O 7, - WANA0tM1NT vtaf00R SuRWiltLAl8CE c---j l c i i l_ i i l % o N353 FA L PUNCHA 510 CONSIMuCIlott O~ - w.m l CON TR A C T0ft (QUIPMENT SUPPtitRS ,.9 -p--------- CONIR ACICA1 Q$ ^Q v I~ l kua I I g (twarsioas age g l l as.o speissas l l l g g g g avaasevconsaa action.as , f g y l [ ** 4-J l otr alTL 4---- g+ Sitt SUSC0fainACTOR$ $U0CONIAACTORS 3 gyppggggg SuGCONIAACICAS t .-__a .i_............. 4 gSEl 9 pear M m/oc PuestGt atS89N94DILlif g gp gg g Si^Gd>( M M g g-{, g, g, - * -. - r unc tionat seatstanis I*

---

auDa s ANQ/uN SuMVOLL ANCE VIASHINGTON PUB LIC FIGURE j

POV!ER SUPPLY SYSTEM WAP-3 SoPPcV SV5 tem /fouTg4ctbe i 1 Nucicar Projects 3 EEE e.artzrac es 17.1 4 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT I

c Changes to the QA STATE OF WASHINGTON )

Subject:

Program Description ) County of Benton ) I, G. C. SORENSEN, being duly sworn, subscribe to and say that I am the - Manager, Regulatory Programs, for the WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM, the applicaat herein; that I have full authority to execute this oath; that I have revieved the foregoing; and that to the best of my knowledge, information and belief the statements made in it are true. h N /g /4, 1985 DATE 24% 'G. C. SoreWien, Manager Regulatory Programs On this day personally appeared before me G. C. SORENSEN to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledge that he signed the same as his free act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and seal this [ N day of /) , 1985. ~ / %tary Publil in an'd for the State of Washington 9 Residing at M / \\ __}}