ML20116M330

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Eg Adensam 840410 Request for Implementation Ltr Re Instrumentation for Inadequate Core Cooling.Submitted Info Includes Notification That Sys Installation,Functional Testing & Calibr Complete & Test Results Available for Insp
ML20116M330
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  
Issue date: 04/26/1985
From: Tucker H
DUKE POWER CO.
To: Adensam E, Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8505060188
Download: ML20116M330 (2)


Text

s*

DUKE POWER GOMPANY P.O. HOX 33180 CHARLOTTE, N.O. 28242 HALH. TUCKER TEtreinoxe visa rammionwr (704) 373-4531 April 26, 1985 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Attention:

Ms. E. G. Adensam, Chief Licensing Branch No. 4 Re: Catawba Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414

Dear Mr. Denton:

of th. E. G. Adensam's letter of April 10, 1984 requested an implementation letter regarding the instrumentation for inadequate core cooling. Duke Power Company submits the following information for the areas addressed in Enclosure 6:

1) Notification that the system installation, functional testing, and calibration is complete and test results are available for inspection.

Response: The system is installed. Functional testing and calibration is complete. The test results are available for inspection.

2) Summary of licensee conclusions based on test results, e.g.:

(a) the system performs in accordance with design expectations and within design error tolerances; or (b) description of deviations from design performance specifications and basis for concluding that the deviations are acceptable.

Response: The system is performing in accordance with design expectations and within design error tolerances.

3) Description of any deviations of the as-built system from previous design descriptions with any appropriate explanation.

Response: There were no deviations of the as-built system from previous design descriptions.

4) Request for modification of Technical Specifications to include all ICC instrumentation for accident monitoring.

h1 8505060188 850426 PDR ADOCK 05000413 P

PDR l ()

i

c-Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director April 26,1985 Page Two Response: The recommendations of Generic Letter 83-37 NUREG-0737 Technical Specifications have been incorporated into the Unit 1 Technical Specifications and will be incorporated into the Unit 2 Technical Specifications.

5) Request for NRC approval of the plant-specific installation.

Response: The Catawba ICC instrumentation is described in Table 1.9-1, Item II.F.2 of the Catawba FSAR and is discussed in Section 4.4.3.4 of Supplement 2 to the Catawba SER.

6) Confirm that the E0P's used for operator training will conform to the technical content of the NRC approved E0P guidelines (generic or plant specific).

Response

Section 13.5.2 of Supplement 4 to the Catawba SER confirms that the E0P's used for operator training conform to the NRC approved E0P guidelines.

Very truly yours, f8.

lh Hal B. Tucker WLH: sib cc:

Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 NRC Resident inspector Catawba Nuclear Station Robert Guild, Esq.

P. O. Box 12097 Charleston, South Carolina 29412 Palmetto Alliance 2135h Devine Street Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Mr. Jesse L. Riley Carolina Environmental Study Group 854 Henicy Place Charlotte, North Carolina 28207