ML20116F413
| ML20116F413 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba |
| Issue date: | 10/11/1984 |
| From: | AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | |
| References | |
| OL-I-157, NUDOCS 8505010086 | |
| Download: ML20116F413 (2) | |
Text
M....
/F7 lo fl.
A6-a l
00CHETED Tabulation of Concerns From Screeninst Interviews USNRC
- 1. Have knowledge of violation of interpass temperature
'85 APR 25 A1057 2.
Knowledge of arc strikes removed without proper approval CFFICE OF SECrit. TAP 00CKETING & SERVICi.
Know of people assigned to watch for inspectors
- 5. Feel that the quality of work has suffered due to production pressure 6.
Been told to or have performed work without process control in hand 7.
Knowledge of inspector performing productions work 8.
Instructed to work on something that was nonconformed
- 9. Concerned over cold spring of pipe t
- 10. Told to work on weld when bevel was wrong
!!. Concerned with quality of vendor welds
- 12. Feel that employees are "out to get" the supervisor or cause trouble i
- 13. Feel they would not discuss quality concerns with supervision
- 14. Has concern over how system was tested
- 15. Told to do, or did, less than acceptable work
- 16. Concern over proper preheat
- 17. Concern over excessive weave width
- 18. Given copy of test prior to " red head" certification test 4
- 19. Concern of all bolts not in structural steel 20.
g Concern of holes blown in backing rings
- 21. Given instructions to deceive an inspector Dan,t a 6 0 '4 B 4 l 4 cmcuitin. n /N
- 22. Was asked to stencil weld he did not make
,,,,, ( m g g g g g cp
- 23. Improper welding technique on teflon seated valves st ff totannto Applicant RECilVIO
'U "
8505010086 841011 PDR ADOCK 05000413 '
coat e otre Q
PDR g,,,
y ) o ;p pc/
otha mtam lb5 N,NVLM N U2N prepeter
n 2. -/ <_
A6-b
. 24. Stainless steel filler material in carbon steel weld
- 25. Violation of hold point without reprocessing process control
- 26. Concern over crack in reactor wall Note: This list is a " raw cut" of concerns found in interviews - little judgement was used in determining the significance of the concern prior to adding it to the list. the list does not take into account statements in other interviews that tend to negate the concerns.
ARHjr/am 5/22/84
.