Letter Sequence Other |
|---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML20093F3191984-10-10010 October 1984
Forwards Procedure for Performing Task Analysis & Verification for Detailed Control Room Design Review, Per 840924 Meeting W/Nrc.Response Time for Sys or Components Will Be Analyzed as Appropriate.Task Analysis Defined
Project stage: Meeting
ML20093F3491984-10-31031 October 1984
Procedure for Performing Task Analysis & Verification for Detailed Control Room Design Review
Project stage: Other
ML20101G9201984-12-21021 December 1984
Provides Addl Info Re Detailed Control Room Design Review, Per NUREG-0737,Item I.D.1.All Future Control Room Mods Will Undergo Human Factors Review Prior to Implementation
Project stage: Other
ML20100E9791985-03-31031 March 1985
Procedure for Performing Task Analysis (& Verification) for Snupps Detailed Control Room Design Review
Project stage: Other
ML20100E9611985-04-0101 April 1985
Forwards Revised Procedure for Performing Task Analysis (& Verification) for Snupps Detailed Control Room Design Review. Closing Rept Anticipated by 850501
Project stage: Other
ML20116E8171985-04-24024 April 1985
Final Rept:Task Analysis & Verification of Snupps Control Room
Project stage: Other
ML20116E8051985-04-26026 April 1985
Forwards Final Rept:Task Analysis & Verification of Snupps Control Room. Rept Details Process Used in Performing Task Analysis & Presents Results in Form of Findings & Responses
Project stage: Other
IR 05000482/19850111985-04-26026 April 1985
Insp Rept 50-482/85-11 During Feb 1985.Violations Noted: Failure to Properly Document Procedural Discrepancies Discovered During Performance of Tests & Issuance of Permits for Fire Doors W/O Required Evaluation
Project stage: Request
NRC-85-0016, Clarifies Final Rept for Task Analysis for Snupps Dcrdr Submitted on 850426.Attachment Contains All Necessary Info to Complete Human Factors Issues Addressed by Both Licenses1985-05-24024 May 1985
Clarifies Final Rept for Task Analysis for Snupps Dcrdr Submitted on 850426.Attachment Contains All Necessary Info to Complete Human Factors Issues Addressed by Both Licenses
Project stage: Other
ML20134M9521985-08-30030 August 1985
Forwards Request for Addl Info on 850426 Submittal Re Functional & Task Analysis.Info Necessary to Permit Completion of Review.Response Requested within 60 Days of Ltr Receipt
Project stage: RAI
TMI-85-084, Forwards Addl Info Re Procedures Generation Package,Per Bj Youngblood 850830 Request for Info on Functional & Task Analysis1985-11-0404 November 1985
Forwards Addl Info Re Procedures Generation Package,Per Bj Youngblood 850830 Request for Info on Functional & Task Analysis
Project stage: Request
ML20214W8821986-12-0202 December 1986
Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 850524,1104 & 861105 Submittals Re Process Used to Identify Deviations from Emergency Response Guidelines.Justification Provided for Identifying Deviations Acceptable
Project stage: Approval
ML20214W8651986-12-0202 December 1986
Forwards Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 850524,1104 & 861105 Submittals Re Process Used to Analyze Instrumentation & Control Characteristics from Emergency Response Guidelines & Procedures Generation Package.Process Acceptable
Project stage: Approval
1985-04-01
[Table View] |
Text
6 e
e SNUPPS Stenderdised Nuclear Unit Power Plent System 5 choke cherry need Nicholas A. Petrick Iend 20eso Executive Director April 26,1985 SLNRC 85-12 FILE: 0671.1 SUBJ: Task Analysis for SNUPPS DCRDR Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Docket Nos.:
50-482 and 50-483
Dear Mr. Denton:
Transmitted herewith are 3 copies of the Final Report for the Task Analysis for SNUPPS Detailed Control Room Design Review (DCRDR). The report details the process used by SNUPPS in performing the task analysis and presents the results in the form of findings and responses. An implementation schedule for the findings resulting from the verification of the task analysis is also attached herewith for both SNUPPS units.
With this transmittal, all human factors issues addressed by both licenses, specifically, license condition 2.C.(8) for Wolf Creek and 2.C.(7)(a) for Callaway are considered closed.
truly yours 0AA
.iM
~
i olas A. Petrick h
DJK/bds Attachment cc:
G. L. Koester KGE
>7p I[
J. M. Evans KCPL e
D. F. Schnell UE (J p 't H. Bundy USNRC/WC W. L. Forney USNRC/ Reg. III D. R. Hunter USNRC/ Reg. IV B. Little USNRC/ CAL ss s
8504300429 850426 PDR ADOCK 05000482 F
PDR
b o.
e s
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE FOR FINDINGS RESULTING FROM THE VERIFICATION OF THE TASK ANALYSIS FOR SNUPPS DCRDR Action Implementation Schedule Finding Required ?
Callaway Wolf Creek 1
No NA NA 2
No NA NA 3
No NA NA 4
No NA NA 5
Yes (1)
(2) 6 Yes (1)
(2) 7 No NA NA 8
No NA NA 9
No NA NA 10 No NA NA 11 Yes (1)
(2)
(1)
Implementation planned prior to implementing procedures based on the revision 1 Emergency Response Guidelines.
(2)
Implementation planned prior to entering mode 2 operation.
DJK/bds/6b24 L
a