ML20115J533
| ML20115J533 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 04/18/1985 |
| From: | Brunner J CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| CON-#285-645 OL, OM, NUDOCS 8504230598 | |
| Download: ML20115J533 (69) | |
Text
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _
pt:0 & UTIL FAbe
%e, _
Vare besedrer Frenese I Sortemener and Genreef Coenuri J E Brunner O Consumers Juno A Canhem-,ogers Ot::"
","= *r c
O K Peterson James W Dempeer f
W mom E Wiener John P D6ctev Campany Det,KdTED
='",e.,e,,,,
=w d=
c'**'== " c-a us c Mowerd E Ciert Sween Kart
'M NR 22 N1 :15"'I'."E eon *Knea r,e.e.,*Ar o.n.r.i omc t 212 w.it u.cnre.n Av.nu.. Jacuan. ui 492oi e <si7 7884sso Z^ ','*,*,,
wrn.r s Direct Dial Numb.r e (517) 788-1257 0FFICE OF SECRETARY Z",","e*,,,,,,,,
00CKETING & SERVict w eer..
ene t
BRANCH o * " "a**
Gregory A Sande April 18, 1985 iTuS'"'"***
o.nn tw, %
2ElATF.D O,',%
Alternest Mr. Charles Bechhoefer, Esq.
~~
Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission East-West Towers Room E-413 4350 East-West Highway Bethesda, MD 20014 Attached are copies of audit reports and of certain other documents issued by the MPQAD.
48 James E. Brunner CC Dr. Ross Landsman, NRC Region III OL/0M Service List ob 8504230598 850418 9
DR g
ADOCK 05000329 Q
PDR y
. n AUDIT REPORTS Dated January 18 - April 8, 1985 Q-00001 Q-00002 Q-00003 Q-00004 Q-00005 Q-00006 Q-00007 Q-00008 Q-00009
._. _. _ _.. Q-00010 Q-00011 Q-00012 Q-00013 Q-00014 Q-00015 Q-00016 Q-00017 l
t
....e.v-w..-
,-,.,--m..------w
..-e,-r---,,.----,-w.,,.r--w.,pye._____
R;vistd 4/12/85 OM/0L SERVICE LIST Mr. Frank J. Kelley, Esq.
Mr. Steve Gadler Attorney General of the 2120 Carter Avenue State of Michigan St. Paul, MN 55108 Ms. Carole Steinberg, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General Atomic Safety & Licensing Environmental Protection Div.
Appeal Board 720 Law Building U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Lansing, MI 48913 Washington, DC 20555 Mr. Myron M. Cherry, Esq.
Mr. William Clements (2)
Cherry & Flynn Docketing & Services 3 First National Plaza U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Suite 3700 Office of the Secretary Chicago, IL 60602 Washington, DC 20555 Mr. - Wendell H.- Marshall Ms. Mary Sinclair 4625 S. Saginaw Road 5711 Summerset Street Midland, MI 48640 Midland, MI 48640 Mr. Charles Bechhoefer, Esq.
Dr. Jerry Harbour Atomic Safety & Licensing Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission East-West Towers East-West Towers Room E-413 Room E-454 4350 East-West Highway 4350 East-West Highway Bethesda, MD 20014 Bethesda, MD 20014 Dr. Frederick P. Cowan Atomic Safety & Licensing Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 6152 N. Verde Trail Washington, DC 20555 Apt. B-125 Boca Raton, FL 33433 Mr. Michael Miller, Esq.
Mr. William D. Paton, Esq.
Isham, Lincoln & Beale Counsel for the NRC Staff 3 First National Plaza U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Suite 5200 Washington, DC 20555 Chicago, IL 60602 Mr. Frederick C. Williams Mr. P. Robert Brown, Jr.
Isham, Lincoln & Beale Clark, Klein & Beaumont 1120 Connecticut Ave., N.W.
1600 First Federal Building Suite 325 1001 Woodward Avenue Washington, DC 20036 Detroit, MI 48226
i-OM/0L Servica List (C nt'd.)
P g2 2 i
Ms. Barbara Stamiris Ms. Lynne Bernabei 5795 North River Road Government Accountability Route 3 Project of the Institute Freeland, MI 48623 for Policy Studies i
1901 Q Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20009 i
Mr. John Demeester, Esq.
Mr. James E. Brunner, Esq.
Dow Chemical Building Consumers Power Company Michigan Division 212 West Michigan Avenue Midland, MI 48640 Jackson, MI 49201
j 15 NCR NO.
17 REV i
QUALITY 0-00001
]
ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSUED l
DIVISION 1/4/85 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE 1
OF 2
RECEIVED OAD FOR."1 1
11EM LOCATION JM i'$ 1365 i
Warehouse 71, Level "A" Storage C.P.Co.Isaa) 2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REV.
3 PART NAME 4 SEhlAL NO.
"A N/A 9-92-00'.
5 ITEw DESCRIPTION Mendix Hydro-thermograph "edel 18594 el Power Corpe-- '- ' stru.cn: - 2 2 3 I
I t~t'P SYSTE." Nr.
- ~ EETE!.ES r DOCU."E'T 5
w: A.N.I.
ern" m '
I s inr the Sinutdu n Phase i l QAF'
. of :L ':idland Ener-: C:n:cr. P:li:e 12
-- INSPECT ION - PLAN REV 10 - ACTION..ORGAhlZATION SM-1.70 2
Warehouse and Salvage 4
11 ACTIVITY HOLD REQUIRED:
ACTIVITY HOLD ORDER NO.
YES X
NO N/A 12 REQUIREMENT QAPP for the Shutdown Phase of the Midland Energy Center - Policy 412, " Control of M.casuring and Test Equipment," Section 1.0 requires that measuring and test equipment used to establish conformance to criteria are identified, controlled, calibrated and adjusted to maintain accuracy.
13 NONCONFORMANCE The Bendix Hydro-thermograph in Warehouse #1, Level "A" Storage area is out-of-calibration as of 1/3/85.
14 NCR ORIGINATED BY
/
/- *l-b6' DATE D A Nott 19 HOLD TAGS APPLIED YES X
NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATED ARD.
ITEM SEGREGATED YES X
NO N/A 21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 NCR REVI BY:
N7 REPORTABILITY
.f YES X NO 3
DATE:
/- - 8S.
22 DETERMINED TO BE REPORIABLE 25 SECTION HEAD, ASSURANCE ENGINEERING l
DATE:
N/4 QA-6 Rev 0
. ~. - -. - -
-. ~ - --.-
d
... c. c
~
I
~
v' i
he 27 FROCESS COF.EECT:VE ACT'.T. cE0*J:RE'
{
! YES 2F RE:0.W E'.T:7 r!."?.'T'^"
" c
,RE~c.:R
. E A.: :.
. _. =
30 ADOITIDNAl N "'A T ' "
Ti.1 i
i s
i g
j i
~
i 31 DISTRIBiTION CONCU5iRENCE ACTION ORGANIZATION DAT E OAD CUSCi:REENCE DATE m
ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.
(ASME) IF REQUIRED 1
32 DISFOSITION ACTION TAKEh l
J e
33 METHOD OF DISPOSIIION ACTION VERIFICATION NCR CLOSED BY RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION I
l ACCEPTABLE l
l UNACCEPTABLE QAD
- DATE IF UNACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR NUMBER A.N.I.
(ASME)
DATE IF REQUIRED OA-6 Rev 0
[
15 NCR NO.
17 REV Y#/
QUALITY n nnnot
/ -n-u ASSURANCE 16 'DATE ISSUED DIVISION
- _;= m w/.c Z//r/m#
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT IS PAGE 1
0F ' 9 QAD FORM 1 1 ITEM LOCATION Auxiliary Building, Floor F9, Area 3, Elevation 685 2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REY.
3 PART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.
OVE-635 N/A N/A 5 ITDi DESCRIPTION RECEIVED EEC I9 1355 Make up Air Electric Heating Coil C P. Co. Legal 6 ITEM START'JP SYSTEM NO.
7 REFERENCE DOCUMENT 8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRED OGLH M-485, Revision 22 N/A 9 INSPECTION PLAN REV 10 ACTION ORGANIZATION N/A N/A Maintenance Department 11 ACTIVITY HOLD REQUIRED:
ACTIVITT HOLD ORDER NO.
TES X
NO N/A 12 REQUIREMENT Mechanical Equipment list in Tech. Spec. M-485, Revision 22 identifies OVE-63B as being Q-listed.
13 NONCONFORMANCE Maintenance Order 0-AHV-22400699-9 identified the equipment as non-Q.
Due to equipment being designated as such, the M.O. was not routed to QAD for review and inclusion of any witness / hold points.
L.L;- r-..
1,,
...-L pm.f..
J -.J~ n ^t" L-.us.mG f M
/
M 2/dfg 14 NCR ORIGINATED BY g [g fjgg This NCR supersedes NCR A-00282
'DATE 19 HOLD TAGS APPLIED YES X
NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATED AREA ITEM SECREGATED YES X
NO N/A 7
21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 2
R I
BY hw:
REPORTABILITY g
y TES Y NO
}
/
5
/ /d, [ b, 2jg
/
DATE:
22 DETERMINED TO BE REFORTABLE 25 SECTION HEAD, URANCE ENGINEERING DATE:
/f C QA-6 Rev 0
/
[/~
/ /
~
~
Q-00003 Pts 2 2 of 2
.26 CAUSE I
27 PROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED l
lYES l
l NC 28 RECCIGENDE DISPOSITION I
l REWORK l
l SCRAP / REJECT l
l REPAIR l
l USE AS IS 29 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEEDE l
lYES l
l NO CR NO.
30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
- 31 DISTRIBUTION CONCURRENCE ACTION ORGANIZATION DATE QAD CONCURRENCE DATE ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.
(ASME) IF REQUIRED 32 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN i
l 33 METHOD OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION NCR CLOSED BY RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION l
l ACCEPTABLE I
l UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATE IF UNACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR NUMBER A.N.I.
(ASME)
DATE IF REQUIRED QA-6 Rev 0
[
g r. 3 3 e..... 7 1"
1 u,
15 NCR NO.
17 RW 4
l QUALITY d. --
o ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSUED 1
DIVISION
/. M -/.s NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE /
OF 4 RECEIk. D z.
oAD F0aN 1 1
1 ITIM LOCATION l
TG l.2 Gra..
2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REV.
3 PART NAME 4 S ERIAL NO. * ' ' '^ '~"-
NA Zws'u NA 5 ITEM DESCRIPTION Zsraass Mobilax - 2 I4 og faha.
S1%.k.
No II-xSto9 D U Q sNd u,.--..,
N CO F..)
w 6 ITEM STARTUP SYSTEM NO.
7 REFERENCE DOCiT I
8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRED I
U C.
O l P t.S'-472 s No l
9 INSPECTION PLAN REV 10 ACTION ORGANIZATION D - DDDO/.-.. -
D.
Y f4/~ta f... & V/ h,$
L-11 ACTIVITY ROLD REQUIRE:
ACTIVITY HOLD ORDER NO.
TES g NO 12 REQUIREMENT S+shss In aukri ad.' jaart 'WD I,
(_ P c.S p a Db hvI
. subs ifufs%.s ans t
2., L P t.5-412s slalas in r/
Aloilux - 2 I4 o3 tubs.
Sfu.k No ll-bos a9."
13 NONCONFORMANCE M2IsrkI rscalvad a>as i,el 21s ot2larad.
W.ndu
.sah.sfitufa.ol *Ms61/a&EP2 14 a3 Mu Sfuk No
//- oos 77. "
NCR GINATED BY
\\.
d
/-2s-as DATE
"~
'Q 19 ROLD TAGS APPLIED YES
% NO 20 ?,0 CATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATED AREA gf.4)WM O
[Q A/d l
ITEM SECREGATED 4 YES NO 21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 NCR REV 4
i REPORTABILITY YES
- NO
[
Sd:h,-s i
'UA$: /- N W d
\\
22 DETERMINED TO BE REPORTABLE 25 SECTION HEAD, ASSURANCE ENGINEERING i
YES NO DATE:
Q4-6 Rev 0 i
s
... - - _. _..., _ _. - -, _ - ~.. - -.. -
S DI 0 0"OOdd 26 CAUSE Yds!D04
& O s r7 7-t/ W n Msres +c -
t
?
- P ;
v a
- ~~
c.&j
/~
e, I g? ' N iTES l L - I NO 27 PROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED
,.s h.,
28 R GEED DISPOSITION y
l l REWORK l
l SCRAP / REJECT l
l REPAIR l el USE AS IS 29 CONDITIGIAL PMRAIE NEEDED l
l YES R NO CR NO.
30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
.56 &- yncHdy -.46rrix ls ?t.d O f4lb 3 t/PE 75 P/0 y0 3 % -
l S exd44 C5C-Tf/ 32 I
m 31 DISTRIBUTION CONCURRENCE 1
- A,4$s#
2 - {s - W N%
c-Q 2-6-e5 A
a.a, -# <
AA i
ENGIN N G DATE A.N.I.
(ASME) IF REQUIRED I
32 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN bh Aflhk DC
)
C b
c-D j
l Cf 0 sL_k_
A.
6-cos77 l
w i
CR CLOSED BY
'33 METHODOFDIS{0STIONACTIONVERIFICATION Dxume%
%sa RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION
'\\f 2-ses I d ACCEPTA3LE l
l UNACCEPTABLE QQ DATE I
IF UNACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR I
NUMBER i
A.N.I. (ASME)
DATE l
IF REQUIRED QA-6 Rev 0
r-e 15 NCR NO.
17 REV l
m r -m-Q-00002 0
A'"~.CC:
16 DATE ISSL'ED l
- 1-l ? r:
January l '.. 1988 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE 1
0F 2
I RECEIY3D OAD FCFM 1 7s ;!IX LOCATION g,y,3 N/A e' n m,
2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REV.
3 PART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.
~- " N N/A N/A N/A 5 !!IM DESCRIPTION Procedures for the Shutdown Phase of the Midland Energy Center:
EN-002
" Corrosion Monitoring" CD-001
" Requirements for Soils Remedial Work" EN-UO3
" Configuration Control" CD-002
" Material Storage and Handling"
.- L
" Classification of Structures, PR-002
" Procurement" Systems and Components" 6 I!E:: ST5JCUP SYSID: NO.
I REFERC;CE OCCUMENT 8 ASME A.S. I. F.IQUIRED Quality Assurance Program g
No Plan tv.sers
-- 9 -INSPECTION PLAN
-REV-10 ~ ACTION-ORGANIZATION-JAMooney MEC Sice - --- -
e nar a
y Assurance N/A RJErhardt, Engineering 11 ACTIVITY HOLD REQUIRED:
ACTIVITY HOLD ORDER NO.
YES X NO N/A 12 REC.UIREMENT QAPP, Policy 5, " Instructions, Procedures and Drawings" Section 1.1 requires: " Activities affecting quality are accomplished in accordance with documented instructions."
QAPP, Introduction, Section 5.0 requires: "This QAPP is implemented on October 1, 1984 with full compliance by January 1, 1985."
13 NONCONFORMANCE Contrary to the above, the subject procedures were not approved as of January 11, 1985. These procedures address safety related activities that are ongoing during the Shutdown Phase of the Midland Energy Center.
It is re.ognized that there have been extenuating circumstances such as:
limited resources, slow response time during comment cycle, and higher priority for Shutdown activities that affect the Company's financial condition.
It is also recognized that these procedures will document, not change, the methods by which these activities are performed. This condition is, however, in 14
' R ORIGIN TED BY g&(qf4 noncompliance with the QAPP and action needs to j
/ / [6,
/
be taken to correct the condition on a priority basis.
AATE i
- 19 HOLD TAGS APPLIED YES X NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATED AREA ITEM SECREGATED YES X NO N/A 21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 R
REPORTABILITY
/Wb DATE:
22 DETERMINED TO BE REPORTABLE 25 SECTION HEAD, ASSURANCE 'ENG EERING N/A A
/ // g ~
DATE:
QA-6 Rev 0
h i'
NCR Q-00002 Page 2 of 2 n.
. umm.
Ci.
~.
- a.
I i
??.CCESS CCRRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED l
lTES NO
~'
KECC.0' ENDED DISPOSITION
}
3 t'
! PD???
[~ l SCRAP /RE.'ECT l
l REPAIR 8
t'9F AS IS
' !:'. :. /. -._EASI NEEDE; i
lYES l
l NO CR 50.
.;:.:L :N E0R M : ION i
11 DISTRIBUTION CONCURRENCE ACTION ORGANIZATION DATE QAD CONCURRENCE DATE 4
ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.
(ASME) IF REQUIRED I
32 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN l
i.
f r
33 METHOD OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION NCR CLOSED BY RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION YERIFICATION U ACCEPTABLE l
l UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATE IF UNACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR NUMBER A.N.I. (ASME)
DATE IF REQUIRED W
Bev 0
l-t To JTChristy, Midlard En2rgy Cntar From RLoliver/ PEPS u, Midland Energy Center CONSUMERS POWER 9_-
COMPANY Date January 31, 1985 Subject MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER Internal DISPOSITION OF NCR Q-00004 Correspondence File: 0460.3 UFI: 73*10*03 Serial: CSC-8132 CC JLWood, MEC RLBull, MEC DJVokal, MEC FJGroves, MEC GWRowe, MEC EWGoold, MEC The subject NCR was generated during Receipt Inspection of a shipment of a grease product manufactured by Mobil Oil Corporation. The specification required grease designated as Mobilux 2 to be shipped while the actual shipment contained Mobilux EP-2 grease.
Mobilux 2 and Mobilux EP-2 are lithium soap based greases of the same grade.
EP-2 also contains an additive that makes it suitable for use in " Extreme Pressure" applications. Based on the industrial products brochure describing the Mobilux 2 and the Mobilux EP-2 lubricants and discussions with Mobil Oil personnel, we have concluded that in all cases where Mobilux 2 grease is specified, Hobilux EP-2 may be substituted.
If you have any questions, please contact us.
'4.-
?%.
-w.
I[.
j.'
~
T
[ -c$$
vs*g3 4
h
[$)
,7.2lf.i,,$J#
Q
). ! E' u
e h
'* 1 IC0185-0001D-CN04
=
[REV 15 NCR NO.
17 QUALITT a - Occos ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSUED y/s,d4 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 P GE I
0F L UL1V Lu QAD FORM 1 c
la iJ'd 1 ITEM LOCATION WAREHOUSE 1&2
- c. p,co. tocci 2 DkAWING OR PART NO. AND REY.
3 P 4 SERIAL NO.%895l3ge8932, ROS NT u0essr, unaw6,*oswt, yjA "RAN5hMTTERS ans7sv.netrce. nea764. Mos7A7 5 ITm DESCRIPTIO" IISS SERIES 3 TRANSMITTERS CPC0 PU RC H AS E OR DERS* Sol0-!X69-QA S'0f0-5402-AA, %D-Glt-QR 7220 AC; ITEM M.S; 2FT-0440A, CfTEL
} ORDERS:
6 ITEM STAsaur SYSTEM NO.
7 RarszENCE DOClinsal 8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRED N/A QA-G REMO No 9 INSPECTION PLAN REV J JLCTION_0RGANIZATION
-ACILITtES AND MATER lkLS blVISION Njn 11 ACTIVITY ROLD UIRED:
ACTIVITY ROLD ORDER NO.
i TES NO m
Y2 cl4'1m'"' SECTION 4.2.2 0F PROCEDURE QA-6 REVO STATE S IN PART:'WHEN A NONGoNFoRMANCE 15 REPORTED TO OR DETEGTED BY QAD PERSONNEL, GAD 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR:
- d. DOCUMENTING NONCONFORMANCE ON A NCR CAPPENDIX A)"
13 NONCONFORMANCE A C0PY OF A PART 21 N OT/CE WA5 RECEI VED BY CPC0 FROM ROSEMOUNT INC.
INDICATIN6s A POTENTIAL LEAK PA TH IN THE SEAL OF THE THREA DS BETWEEN THE SENSOR MobutE AMD THE ELECTROWlC5 HOU SIN 6i ON 1l53 SERIES B
TRANSMITTERS MANUFACTURED AND SHIPPED AF TE R.
JANUA R4 l0 l'ISLI.
TMESE UN IT.S A RE IDENTIFIED
W/$bd >
r.n-ss Ar DATE 19 HOLD TAGS APPLIED YES X NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATED AREA ITEM SECREGATED 1 TES NO WAREHOUSE 2
HOLD A REAg
- f' g,,AcQ' 21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 REVIEW BY:
l l
gn=1"yg o
i 22 NED TO BE PORTABL 25 SECTION HEAD (
E ENGIN 7'7' us Aae%r +n/,c/s$
l QA-T4(s W RepoiTM To mg oe
),,
y
/n
m----
ewvw-e---~e-em--
,.ww-r'm'
- ^^ww-
21 o J.
l.,
5 CAUSE s
7 PROCESS CORRECTIVR ACTION REQUIRED l
I TES I
l NO 8 REGG emav D DISPOSITION I
l REWORK I
l SCRAP / REJECT l
l REPAIR I
1USE AS IS i
9 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEEG I
l TIS I
l N0' CR NO.
O ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1
i L DISTRIBUTION CONCUREDCE ACTION ORGANIZATION DATE QAD CONCURRENCE DATE ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.
(ASME) IF REQUIRED 2 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN 3 METHOD OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION NCR CLOSED BY RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION l
l ACCEPTABLE l
l UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATE' IF UNACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR l
NUMBER i
A.N.I.
(ASME)
DATE IF REQUIRED
.- 6 Rev 0
.. e n..
-)w g
TCiotdia., rz -sos,Joh aaeawa\\.\\ \\.
.u 1
ts
- - + " ;i. ; x e,-
4 o
,Consd note october is. 19s' OCT101084 CmeANY Subject NONCONFORNING ETERIAL NUCIAR UCENNNG
nternal Correspondence TC5 84-21 CC TLRandolph, JEYope.
D;C: A200-73*10*02 DJTandevalle 73*20*06 I
The attached letter from Rosemont to our Fu tchasing Department identifies a potential problem with 1153 series 3 transaitters shipped after January 10, 1984. A previous letter, dated September 1 0, 1984 specified that there is a possibility that a leak path through the ti ansmitter housing could cause the instrument to stop functioning during posti Llated accident conditions. Please verify that nonconforming material reports have been initiated for those 1153 series 3 transmitters received via th a referenced purchase orders.
9 o-ee um a u 16ft &n
% (3) Veceed Q
~
s G/ 6
% a to was-3020 s*A <~ t G L f & &.
72r n m w do IMM.
c/ 4 & %
% cm, Lt a Ba & &,u a a A nc/L J
& YCCe!Q f
ef(,,,_ mfQ, FeV/,
d6/tTlPV I
M l
es&J-i IC1085-0060A-NL04 1
I
[
ma** = "'t est.
Y i
- ","M. % m..
- 1..1 TWH91e 576 31e3 ftLEX 3M183 Rosesternt-7
~
October 2. 1984 Purchasing Agent Consumers Power Co.
1 212 West Michigan Avenue s
Jackson. MI 49201
Subject:
10 CFR Part 21 Notification Letter dated September 10, 1984
... gu-
.n-413589. 413588, 413587, 4
Reference:
-1)-Your Purchase order Number 501.,5.3.19,_.5402, _5569...1005-3030 0
5
- 2) Rosemount Order Number Gentlemen:
This is a follow-up to the above notification which will provide you with the serial numbers / tag numbers of those transmitters that may be affected by this potential problem.
The enclosed listing identifies the 1153 Series 8 transmitters which were manufactured and shipped after January 10, 1984.
Again, the notification applies to only those 1153 Series 8 transmitters manufactured after January 10, 1984, and those units installed in an. environment subject to a LOCA or HELB.
Currently we are in an extensive evaluation and test program to detennine the cause of the lett path. Again, en:e the cause is identified, a corrective action will be established.
We expect the results of our testing to be available in approximately two weeks. Another status letter will be sent to you at that time.
i /-b Very truly yours.
.W f.t.dQy gV
/
R.C. LaSell Q.k (q,g.(,
Manager
/njb O
!N a
4 1954 14 0
~
r$ ru. wig:so Enclosureom uma b<ww.
%>ipJnT&l 72 A!v'o/ A l4) is10-M ee :
P
- 3. zefassix 6s
~r - ts C/ [nec\\
t
~
y-l ATTACHMENT A P.O. #
N.O. i Tae f Serial f 5010-5569-QA 413587 N/A 408951
)
5010-5402-QA 413588 N/A 408952 413588 N/A 408953 V>
5010-5318-QA 413589 N/A 408955 413589 N/A 408956 d13589 J/A 408957_
1005-3030-QA 416456 N/A.
408972 416456 N/A 408973 4k' 416456 N/A 409189 e
eL 6a/L ' 4 4 J-Cm E) De er L(
r er: a
~ % s@btm J
a s
m.,
g
~.
V
- E),
'Q :55 A; g y 8 g
noGERBouMT INC.
d-13g31 West 70m Spost F
seen Pieme, tsaaessen esse u.s.A.
TeL1813M188W TWX 9618 TELEX 29 e183 7d Wood (v s 7wr) v F/
Rosemount-October 2. 1984 Mr. V.A. Anderson. Director of Purchasing Consumers Power Company 212 West Michigan Avenue Jackson. MI 49201
Subject:
10 CFR.Part 21 Notification, Letter dated September 10. 1984
Reference:
- 1) Your Purchase order Number 7220-J-245-AC
- 2) Rosemount Order Number 410965-Gentlemen:
This is a follow-up to the above notification which will provide you with the serial numbers / tag numbers of those transmitters that may be affected by this potential problem. The enclosed listing identifies the 1153 Series 8 transmitters which were manufactured and shipped after January 10, 1984.
Again, the notification applies to only those 1153 Series B transmitters manufactured after January 10. 1984, and those units installed in an environment subject to a LOCA or HEL8.
Currently we are in an extensive evaluation and test program to determine the cause of the leak path. Again, once the cause is identified, a corrective action will be established.
We expect the results of our testing to be available in approximately two weeks. Another status letter will be sent to you at that time.
Very truly yours.
- .z. ;[4.
^
R.C. LaSell Manager
/njb Enclosure Mr. R.C. Bauman,,,
cc:
_ _. _ _ _ _. _. _ _ _ _ _ _. _. - _ _ _. _ _ _ _, _ _ ~., -.. _ -, _ _ _.. _ _., -...,, - _
.-r-E f,., =
ATTAQSWIT A Purchase Order No. 7220-J-245-AC Rosemount Order No. 410965 Tae Number Serial Number 7220-J-245AC; Item 4.5;2FT-0440A 408764 7220-J-245AC; Item 4.5;2FT-04408 408765 7220-J-245AC; Item 4.5;2FT-0440C 408766 7220-J-245AC; Item 4.5;2FT-04400 408767 e
1 I
l l
i l
-...._--____.___..__,________...-,_.m._-
+
7OI D P '*.
. s.t"a n)d '; ;,' g,?
I 15 NCR NO.
17 REV
@ALITY 0-00006 0
ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSUD DIYTSION 2-11-85 NGICONFORMANCE REPORT 18 FAGE 1 0F 1 R E C EI v a u' oAD Pcm 1 1
1 IT M LOCATION MAR 1 ? 1935 Auxiliary Building - Elevation 646'-0 l
2 DEANING OR FART NO. AND REY.
3 FART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.
I b " Ww NA Nitrogen Pressure Cases NA 5 IT M DESCRIPTION Auxiliary Building Safeguard chiller Units IVM-59A IVM-595, 2VM-59A and 2VM-59B j
i Nitrogen Pressure Gages l
6 ITEM STAaxur azasza NO.
7 RarnaENCE DOUTrwas 8 ASME A.N.I. RayulmED Quality Assurance Program Pla NA MO-00580 rev 0 NA 9 Amaria110N PLAN REY 10 ACTION ORGANIZATIGE I
M0-00580 0
Operations & Maintenance Division
- 11 ACTIVITY ROLD REQUIRD:
ACTIVITY ROLD ORDER NO.
~
YES X
WO t
12 REQUIREIGNT 1.
Quality Assurance Program Plan Policy #12 rev 0 Paragraph 2.5 states in part,
" Measuring and test equipment is calibrated at specified intervals."
I 4
13 NONC0ttFORMANCE NOTE: Reference MPQAD NCRs C-05727 & C-0528 i
Contrary to the above the labels attached to each of the four gages shows the gages to have an expired calibration due date.
Equip. ID Serial #
Cal. Due Date i
IVM-59A BPC-1358 11-9-84 IVM-598 BPC-1365 11-9-84 2VM-59A BPC-1353 11-9-84 1P NCR IGINAT E BY I
2VM-59B BPC-1437 11-9-84
<W %k 7.-ll-86 dQ~
DATE 19 HOLD TAGS AFFLIE y YES NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATE AREA l
ITEM SEGREGATED YES 1 NO i
on cmaan I,
21 NED TO RDIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 N REVI 8-9g O
REPORTABILI j
j YES NO D
t
// $$-
w l
21 DETERMING TO BE REF0 AB 25 SECTION H
W
.l l
DATE:
4
..m
0-00006 rev 0 name 2 of 2 -
j26 CADSE
&g f CAdi5 UMO f3 /990Ns T'O*C kgssuRL Wd4E A4 Y~ tefMTVM0 1
M f/rr1d 0f.fNufDQW+1, N J$i nt4/HTAseie su o THt+J C4 L etArte su, Ynt*ffke t do ff0GK%
GU4S f5f?fs$ts3HEO 1'O /7/Assu 7,*qin 7ggg dAkt.1.
27 FROCESS CORRECTITE ACTION REQUIRED I VI'YES I
I NO 28 me mpmD DI5?vem05 REWORK l
l SCRAP / REJECT l
l REPAIR l
l USE AS IS 29 CONDITICWAL ItEnBE NEEDED l V YES l
l NO CR NO. Q % g g, gg 30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AL k YE.?62%"L_YY__WC* L L0 I" O L * '
w IT H yALIO O
13.
31,mwt lN V At.n o C A t-t@( AT L o Q4 G.L) Ado CAL 164ATO g A3
?<*C4SS IN A ccod.0 4 W E w IT H ? C* Cl CWE l o M - * * '3.
n 31 DISTR ION CONQURRENCE l
z-tv-tr \\ d g.,
z.i4 s,s h
Oe L
Izc ION DcE Qay:gCURRENCE DcE AC: ION
&g. 2 - /V-Fr
$h 3CINEERING O
DATE A.N.I.
(ASME) IF REQUIRED 32
.SPOSITION ACTION TAKEN 5 bu4h DEADuGC tun (f "%tEd ou
'.l-6 -S{
cM TRE$C k-fte9;ue4 6%6 Aub me (A6 n cM Guan To s wet AwAd i
TOI.ET.AMC.fb.
NCRkOSED BY 33 METHOD OF DISPOSITION ACTION VEltIFICATION dwel-.Su Inspzcfun Plani 16-66 ele; i
RESUL OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION I f DATE QV ACCEPTAB'.E l
iUNACCEPTABLE
(!{M IF UNACCEPTAFLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR hk NUMBER A.N.I. (ASME)
DATE IF REQUIRED Qe-6 Rev 0
'15 NCR NO.
17 REV QUALITY 0-00007 0
ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSUED RECEIVED DIVISION 2-11-85 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 FAGE 1 0F 2
QAD FORM 1 Frn 13
3 FART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.
MP-1 Mini-Pulser 433 5 ITEM DESCRIPTION Mini-Pulser Cal. ID #8325-01198 6 ITDI STARTUP SYSTEM NO.
7 RaramENCE DOCiTr=.n 8 ASME A.N.I. RigvimED NA IS-I-27 rev I-A NA i
l9 INSFECTION PLAN
-REV 10 ACTION ORGANIZATION - - - -
NA SP & LS.S. Woodby 11 ACTIVITY ROLD REQUIRED:
ACTIVITY ROLD ORDER NO.
TES 2 NO NA 12 REQUIREMENT Equipment MP-1 is supposed to ge6erate a pulse height of 10 volts.
13 NONCONFORMANCE Equipment MP-1 is generating a pulse height of 10 millivolts.
NOTE: M&TE usage record page one for 8325-01198 shows no Q activities performed with this equipment.
14 NCR ORIGINATED BY f
W// C DME l~
19 EOLD TAGS APPLI D TES 1 NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SECREGATE ARIA ITEM SEGREGATE 1 TRS NO wAn 1.h 21 NED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 NCR EW REPORTABILITY TES 2 N0 3
DATE:
A/H 05 22 Dsazanissa TO BE REPORTABLE 25 SECTION READ, ASau -
G ~
ING DATE 2 QA-6 Rav 0
~
Q-00007 rev 0 part 2 af 2 j26 CAUSE t
1 27 PROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED l
l YES I
l NO 28 REC 0005NDE DISPOSfff05 l
l RDORK I
ISCRAP/ REJECT l
lREFAIR l
l USE AS IS 29 CONDITIONAI an.mE NEEDE l
l YES l
l NO C1 NO.
30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
.i
+
31 DISTRIBUTION CONCURRENCE ACTIM ORGANIZATIS DATE QAD CONCURRBCE DATE i
ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I. (ASME) IF REQUIRE 32 DISPOSITION ACTION tarum 1
I 33 n am m 0F DISPOSITION ACTIS FERIFICATIS NCR NMED ST l
RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION hCCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATE ACCEPTABLE, SUFIRSEDING NCE 3
I NUMBER A.N. I. ( ASME)
DATE IF REQUIRED l
QA-6 as,0
o 15 NCR NO.
17 REV QUALITY 0-00008 0
ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSUED DIVISION 2-12-85 N(EICONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE i 0F QAD FORN 1
_,y,A E C E I V.
.J r.,
rca 1?,136$
Warehouse #2 2 DEAutar OE PART NO. AND REY.
3 PART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.
i U-F.O. 5008-3634-0A Item 11 Studs Heat #8095577 5 Asam DESCRArrt0N 3 h - 8x24" SA193 37 A/T Stude, Quantity-4 Trace letter H21 NOTE: The attached customer certification identified the stude as 26" long. This length was listed erroneously on the attached C of C.
(Per Marlene Davis of Cardinal's QA department.)
6 11an STAnzur asasun NO.
7 RarssENCE DOCiTun.nz 8 ASME A.N.I. REyutaED NA QA-6 Revision 0 No 4
9 tsarsus10N FLAN REY 10 ACTION ORGANIZATI0lI I
NA Facilities and Materials Division J
I 11 ACTIVITT HOLD REQUIRED:
ACTIVITT HOLD ORDER NO.
~
TES 1 NO l
12 REQUIRinama Sectien 4.2.2 of Procedure QA-6 Revision 0 states in part:
"When a nonconformance i
is reported to or detected by QAD personnel, QAD is responsible fore... d. Documenting
]
nonconformance on a NCR (Appendix A)"
i 13 iHTuicunivanANCE i
A copy of A Part 21 Notice was received by CPCo from Cardinal Industrial Products Corporation indicating that four of thirty two studs received on the above P.O.
(item 11) may not have received the required ultrasonic examination.
i i
l 14 NCR ORIGINATED BT w
2-//- &S
/
DATE 19 HOLD TAGS APPLIED TES 1 No 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATED AREA ITEM SECREGATED 1 TES NO Warahsuna #2 Hold Area
-m 21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 NCR EVI5W B 1
REPORTABILITY John h -
,, / /, [
2 TES NO o
s 22 DsassnINED TO BE REP 0tTABLE 25 SECTION HEAD / AS G
Ernie W. Coold [ y E v TES NO 9J f
DATE:
QA-6 Rev 0 i
e
-. ~.
0-00008 name 2 'of 5, t
I 27 FROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED l
l TES l
l NO 23 measunB DISPOSITION I
IREHORE I
ISCRAP/RUECT l
l REPAIR I
l USE AS IS 29 CONDITIONAL FKmE NEEDS l
lYES l
l NO CR NO.
30 ADDITIONAL INF0EMATION
.i 31 DI Ermuilott CONuumiENCE ACTIS ORGANIZATIGI DATE QAD CONCURRENCE DATE ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.
(ASME) IF REQUIRED 32 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN c.
I 33 NETR(2 0F DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION NCR CLOSED BY RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATE ACCEPTABLE, CE SUPERSEDING NCR NUMBER A.N.I. (ASME)
DATE IF REQUIRED QA-6 Rev 0 1
Ps'zaj,<gs
.,9 rs L a rd i re a e
eseOUSTRIAL PRODUCTS CORPORATNHg PAGE 1
. 2#U 2.TT/m%%"Re'$'sEU."s"e*-
masena CUSTOMER CERTIFICATION CUSTOPER NO. : 7982See CONSUMERS POWER CORP CERT NO. : 0009969 MIDLAND PLANT OPERATIONS CERT DATE:03/16/83 3500 E. MILLER ROAD SHPD DATE 03/16/83 C. I. NO. : 0028796 MIDLAND. MICH 48640 CUST.
P. O. NO. : SOOS-3634-GA C.1. P. ITEM NO. : 011 CUST PO ITEM NO. 011 GTY ORDERED:
32 i
.......................... =........ = = =...............
G T Y SMP D :
4 CER T!FICATION FOR ITEM: 3 1/2-9X26" SA193 B7 A/T STUDS...
HEAT NO: 8095577 TRACE.LTR.:H21
/
CHEMISTRY LISTING
/
'C
.410 Cr
.990~
Mn
.92d' Mo
.200' P
.009 #
.S
.240#
S
.022"'
'....==..........................................
- PHYSICALS **
<< SUB SIZE >>
TENSILE STRENGTH: 137000 PS V YIELD STRENGTH:
114800 PSI'
~
1 ELONGATION: 20.
IN 2 INCHES,
...% R DC T N OF AR EA : 38.1 w'
. = =. = =
++ HARDNESS **
ENDING HARND 285.
BHN u4....
...........ESS ars..........
..=_
- HEAT TREAT DATA **
e TEMPER TEMP 1100 F
{
TIME MIN. TEPP.
MEDIA
- CHARPY IPPACT DATA **
)
68.
F IMPACT STRENGTH MILLS LTRL EXPAN.
% SHEAR AREA TEST 1 62.
41.
33 TEST 2 63.
30.
3 TEST 3 73.
50.
20 AVEGAGE 66.
43.
1 o O.. e e e 3 e e.. e..........................................e.1 9
...........s....r......
ar.d ONTINVED TO PAGE 2
i
)
I t
. - _ _.. _ _, _ - _ _ _ _. ~.
Ps 3a tHs
+ l,~ f 9 E!
-d i n a e
- C w S RI AL PROOL C TS CORPOft ATION
A 4 '
E e..
'.m':..%3 *Z. :.
w CUSTOMER CERTIFICATION CERT NO. : 0028969 CVSTOMEG NO. 7882586 ONSUMEAS POWER CORP CERT DATE.03/16/83 MIDLAND PLAN l UPERATIONS SHPD DATE- 03/16/83 3500 E.
MILLER ROAD C. I. NO. ' 0028796
=! DL ANO. MICH 48640 C.I.P. ITEM NO. 011
'. '.*S
. o. O. NO.
SOOO-3634-GA GTY ORDERED-32 GTY SHPD-4 m---e======zs=============================================================
smo CERTIFICATION FOR ITEM 3 1/2-8X26" SA193 87 A/T STUDS HEAT NO. 8095577 TRACE LTR.H21 o = = =pe = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =. m = m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m e ns PER CPC SPEC. AC QUALITY ASSURANCE INGUIRY NO. 04346 DER ASME B & PV CODE SECTION III, CLASS 1, 1980 EDITION THRU WINTER 1981 ADDENDA.
10CFR21 APPLIES.
HEAT TREATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MATERIAL SPECIFICATION.
SA614. PARAGRAPHS RU. ftW AND RZ ARE APPLIC ABLE TO THIS ORDER.
THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTED AND ULTRASONIC INSPECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION V, ARTICLE 7 (FOR MAGENTIC PARTICLE) AND SECTION V, ARTICLE 5 (FOR ULTRASONIC) OF THE ASME D & PV CODE AND FOUND ACCEPTADLE TO SA-614. PARAGRAPHS RW AND RZ.
INSPECTOR CERTIFIED TO ASNT-TC-A1, LEVEL II.
rHIS NATERI AL WAS SUPPLIED AND PRODUCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CARDINAL INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DATED
- ANUARY 22, 1982. REV.
3.
WHICH MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF
- F A -3800 / ANS I N4 5 2.
~~E AK'sE PRODUCT HAS BEEN SUPPLIED PER AMERICAN SOCIETY OF H -ANICAL ENGINEERS.
l Lbd-L.--
.L51.
$3----------
AUTHORIZED AGENT.
- - --- ::;;a= ~
^
Gae::ts.,.,..,... a'------
l l
l l
t
CF 17. 3 .8 PG#6fo-('
s i)Ro. file.
REPORTING DEFECTS /NON-CONFORMANCE9 4
10CFR PART 21 Cu s t omer.. Cf.e.*nu.. h.9.tf.. E*.?e v'.. b!.dh.d N..EDQS..M1.+.,.Sk u ne i t em e ( s >.... )).............
- e. 0.
C.I. No... M.D b..........
LineItem#(s)..../.I.............
Material Descrir tion. 3. A T.h. d. kh..".. $h'.[$3. b). d
.8bS.
. 9.n.k..:?:. 6.Q 9. 55.12...T.n.ca. L t.r:..U.7.-l...Cuk. *. ?A%9.
. 9.ty..f.. 7.Te f.d. 9th.er.. W t.S.. 3.4
.T.. A f f.. M N.!.8... Y Q.. P l d h f.. h. b. E / Mr7 F S #. @
Defect Noted...
- k wk.. ryrrk..(mD...br..+.W.e.. &. p.tsm.. >.4..#.1 e..
1
.GthR..h..nok.pnpt).:EHhb. 6%.ne.h&bt..tk.k..
.faek...w.s.psr.4etm.s.?.l.*.m..w.t.c.4..t.o.sr...+tt)?.c.*.??.o."
Q s h o t,s e u
of ackton We should kko.
Disposition:
Reportable To Customer:
Yes........u.......
/,
&[...hd.f.Th.h Sisned...
.4
.........Date..
f If reportable, mailed to:....
.OASE.TfI?....N'.(.
[.f........
M.t k.h.. & k.. % t. 4 1.o. " +........
M.o.0.A..Mt!&r..k.2..t!..%.Is.3 2 3 h J, h4. +ue The above material has been shirred to vou on vour referenced P. O.
number.
We have noted a defect which could rossibiv be's safety hazard.
Will vou riease evaluate this noted condition in accoedance with 10CFR21 Parasrarh 21.21 (a) (1) (ii) and (b) (1).
CPleaSie adiise us of action taken.
L.
f.
S 9
8
,.r.
c
'15 NCR NO.
17 REV QUALITY n nnnno n
ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSUED RECEIVED DIVISION 9 19 nc NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE 1 0F 4 QAD FORM 1
~
I.1 i M S 3o
~
I" C P. Co. Lecol Diesel Generator Building, Engine Control Panels 2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REY.
3 PART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.
j Norgren P.O. 7220-M-18 Air Filter Bowls MA 5 ITIM DESCRIPTION Air Filter Bowls located in Engine Control Panels IC-111, 2C-111, IC-112, 2C-112 6 ITEM STARTUP SYSTEM NO.
7 REFERENCE DOCiTrirm 8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRED NA QA-6 revision 0 NA 4
l9 INSPECTION PLAN
-- REV- - - -. --
10- ACTION ORGANIZATION
- ~ - -
NA Eneineerine Technical Sunnart 11 ACTIVITY HOLD REQUIRED:
ACTDITY HOLD ORDER NO.
TES X
NO NA 12 REQUIREMENT Section 4.2.2 of procedure QA-6, revision 0 states in part:
"When a nonconformance is reported to or detected by QAD personnel, QAD is responsible for:... d. Documenting nonconformance on a FCR (Appendix A)"
13 NONCONFORMANCE i
A copy of a part 21 notice was received by CPCo from Transamerica Delaval Inc.
indicating a potential problem with the air filter in the Engine Control Panel, specifically polycarbonate transparent bowls. Reference attached part 21 notifi-cation letter from Transamerica Delaval.
14 NCR ORIGINATED BY J
F W/4hBC
~
MCButterfie DATE 19 HOLD TAGS APPLIED 1 TES NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATED AREA ITEM SEGREGATED TES 1 NO and 2C-112 Eneine C3ntrol Panels 1C-111. 2C-111. IC-112 21 N5ED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 NCR REVIEW l
REPORTABILITY 2 TES NO
[
$//#h 6~
V DATE:
22 Du==imsu TO BE REPOETABLE 25 SECTION HEAD ASSURAB u
,,,,. M, (<
.*/s/ss
'"5 l
QA-6 Rev 0 l
l
o-00000 nm..
2 or 4
$26 CAUSE b
i i
27 PROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED I
ITES I
l NO 28 RECGAGEDED DISPOSITION I
IREWORK I
ISCRAP/ REJECT l
l REPAIR I
lUSE AS IS 29 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEIDED l
l TES l
l NO CR NO.
~
30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION l
l 31 DISTRIBUTION CONCURRENCE ACIION ORGANIZATIGI DATE QAD CONCURRENCE DATE ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.
(ASME) IF REQUIRED 32 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN 33 METES OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION NCR CLOSED BT RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION YERIFICATION ACCEPTABLE I
l UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATE' EFTABLI, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR NUMBER A.N.I. (ASME)
DATE IF REQUIRED QA-6 Rav 0
1 1
Transamenca
. r.n
,,e. v.ae, me.
to.
c.,,,,,,,,, c.,,,,,
e.
Delaval "t;;r s';&*
Oakland. Cahfo,nia 94621 (415) 577 7400 156889 1.54890 l
Jarnaary 22, 1985 Director, Office of Inspectim & Enforcement U.S. Maclear Regulatory conndamirm Hashington, D.C.
20555
Dear Sir:
In accordance with the requirununts of Title 10,* Chapter 10, Code of Federal tiens, Part 21. Transamerica Delaval, Inc., here-by notifies Canadssion of a potential defect in a compcriant of a DSR or DSRV Sts Ly Diesel Generator. 1here could esist a potan-l tial problem with the Air Filter in the Engine Centrol Panel.
l
__ At Cleveland zlacerie Perry sel.=r statim,_ic_was r r-ely_ dis -
covered that the Air Filter for the Engine Control Panel had a poly d s ete transparent bowl. On Novenbar 5,1978 the Filter purchman -ifie= tim as chanpd from the polyc.fsste trans-t bowl to a metal bowl. Tm polyCwete bowl is #s:srated psig at 125'F and the metal bowl is rated 250 s at 175'F.
Wien the specification was originally issued, the rated the carbonate bowl at 250 psi. The air pressure which the Filter see in operation cycles between 200 and 250 at room tsuperature.
New metal bowl Filters have been sent to Cleveland Electric to re-place the polyc.fwste bowls.
We will send copies of this letter to all sites diere we furnished the Engine Cetrol Panel with a sindliar Filter so that the sites can verify that the Filter has a antal bowl.
Transamerica Delavel has supplied the DSR and DSRV Engine with Digine Conrrol Panels to the following sites:
Utility Site Serial No.
Model IMM1= South Energy Gr-dr1F 74033/36 DSRV 16
. Gulf States Utilities River Band 74039/40 DSR 48 Carolina Power & Light Shearon Harris 74046/49 DSRV 16 Ddca Power Cey Catawba 75017/20 DSRV 16 Southern California Miaews San Onofre - -
75041/42' DSRV 20 Cleveland Electric Illtsn.
Perry 75051/54 DSRV 16 TVA Bellefante 75080/83 DSRV 16 Washirgten Public Power WPSS 1 75084/85 DSRV 16 Washington Public Power WPPSS 4 76031/32 DSRV 16 Texas Utilities Services Cceanche Peak 76001/04 DSRV 16 Georgia Power Vogtle 76021/24 DSRV 16 Consmars Power Midland 77001/04 DSRV 12 TVA Hartsville/Phipps Band 77024/35 DSRV 16 SMUD Rancho Seco 81015/16 DSR 48
urievai 5
P 82 4 O f ' '
Q-00009 156889 156890 Page 2 Jarmary 22, 1985 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ca mission l
1he Filtse is marufactured by the C. A. Nororen Co. of Littleton, Colorado.
l Tranammerica Delaval.1he Filter is installed in the Engins. Control Panel by Our rWeien to eliminate the potential the N= Control Panel and to replace the po lam is to inspect ate Filter bowl with a metal bowl, if the Filter does not have a metal bowl.
A visual Wtion can easily det==f= if the Filter bowl is transparant hlyemh e.
t All parts required to-replace the~ bowl ~will be~fuiEishefas~re _ ___.----
quired, m request, and in acccAce with each individsal ccntract.
Since actim is required by others, we cannot estimate ihan the corrective actim will be cmpleted.
Our evaluation on this potential proble was empleted m January 21, 1985.
Very truly yours, gE6
- x. z. O -
==
na.er. w= u-O REB:lw c
l l
~-
15 NCR No.
17 REY QUALITY o-00010 0
ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSURD DIVISIM 9-to-as N WCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE 1
0F 1 g 1 ITEM LOCATION N/A 2 2 1365 l
2 DRANING OR PART NO. AND REY.
3 PART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.'- r 'o Legal N/A N/A N/A 5 ITEM DESCRIPTION Vision examination of all QAD inspection personnel.
6 ITEM STAarur SYSTEM NO.
7 REFERENCE DOCiTnen 8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRED S~
N/A N/A Inspection Personnel 9 uiirki10N PLAN REY 10 ACTION ORGANIZATION N/A Quality Assurance Division
'~'
11 ACTIVITY NOLD REQUIRED:
ACTIVITT SOLD ORDER NO.
YES I
NO N/A 12 REQUIREMENT Appendix B (Vision Examination Record) of the above referenced document contains a near vision exam which specifies the foilowing acceptance criteria:
" Natural or corrected ability to read J-1 letters on a standard,Jaeger's test chart at a minimum of 15 inches."
13 NONCONFORMANCE Contrary to the above, from 1/9/85 through 1/31/85 nine inspection personnel had been tested for distance vision using the J-2 letters on a standard Jaeger's test chart. The J-2 crite'ria is not as stringent as the J-1 letters.
14 NCR ORIGINAT BY
'Z-19-sT 1m
/
1
(
DATE 19 ROLD TAGS APFLIED YES X NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATED AREA ITEM SEGREGATED YES X NO N/A
^
21 NES TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 NCR REVIEW REPORTABILITY YES 3 NO O
j DATE: #/4R 6
22 Dz1r.manize TO BE REPORTABLE 25 SECTION HEAD, ASSURANCE GINEERING N/A [
N/A [
DATE:
QA-6 Eav 0 w
,y,_____
+-e--
.. -m
W oooto Pega 2 of 2
- 26 CAU5E The individual responsible for administering the examination mistakenly used the wrong letters on the near distance vision exam test chart as acceptance criteria.
l l
27 F10 CESS CORRECTIYR ACTICE REQUIRED I X l TES l
l NO 28 RECfneelmE DISPOSITION I
IREWORE l
l SCRAP /RRJECT l
l REPAIR l
l USE AS IS 29 CONDITIONAL Eff M E NEEDED l
l YES W NO CR NO.
30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None.
x 31 DISTRIBUTION CONCURRENCE J
0 I
2-10-87 g
c w
LACTION ORGANIZATIO(
DATE QAD CONCURRENCR DATE AIA NM Mac ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.
(ASME) IF REQUIRED 32 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN The individual responsible for administering the vision examination has been re-instructed to use the correct acceptance criteria. All nine certified inspection personnel have been re-examined for near distance vision using the correct (J-l letters) acceptance criteria of a standard Jaeger's test chart.
All nine examinees have passed the correct acceptance. criteria, resulting in no concern for inspector qualification of past inspections.
l 33 METHOD OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION NCR CLOSED BY g j7 / #/ /
(-
RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION den J <M' /laeflyW '
ACCEPTABLE l
l UNACCEPTABLE.
dQAD /
U DATE 4F UNACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR NUMBER A.N.I.
(ASME)
DATE IF REQUIRED QA-6 Rav 0
q E CI1Y
\\ *.365
- e.,. -
a.ap i.? $$5N5 g
'15 NCR 50, 17 REV QUALITY 0-00011 0
ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSUED DEVISION 2-26-85 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE 1
0F 7 QAD FORM 1 A ITDt LOCATION Soil beneath and around Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Storage Tanks 2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REV.
3 PART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.
Soil Boring Logs NA B1, B2, B3 & B4 NA 5 ITDi DESCRIPTION Data recorded in Soil Boring Logs B1, B2, B3 and B4
,6 ITEM STARTUP SYSTEM NO.
7 REFERENCE DOCUMENT 8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRED NA QA-6 revision 0 no 9 INSPECTION PLAN _ _ _ REV _ _ _ ___
10_ ACTION.. ORGANIZATION.
i NA Engineering Technical Support i ll ACTIVITY HOLD REQUIRED:
ACTIVITY HOLD ORDER NO.
NO YES
_g_
12 REQUIREMENT Section 4.2.2 of Procedure QA-6 revision 0 states in part:
"When a nonconformance is reported to or detected by QAD personnel, QAD is responsible fors...d.
Documenting nonconformance on a NCR (Appendix A)"
13 NONCONFORMANCE It was determined that soil boring logs B1, B2, B3 and B4 may be invalid because of an error that occurred during the submittal of boring data obtained by the subcontractor-Raymond Company. This data was used in the evaluation that determined the potential for soil liquefaction of the sand layer at elevations 600.5' and 603', which is now determined to be inconclusive. Reference the attached letter of notification.
14 NCR ORIGINATED BY Ntkb hokfp 2-Ele'85 DATE RLBishop 19 HOLD TAGS APPLIED YES y
NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATED AREA ITEM SEGREGATED YES y
NO NA b
21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 NCRREVIEWBY\\
. REPORTABILITY YES NO O
y DATE:
2-2S -8D 22 DETERMINED TO BE REPORTABLE 25 SECTION HEAD, ASSURANCE
=Ani 2 YES NO o.4.9.104
(
QA-6 Rav 0
Q-00011 page 2 of 7 26 CAUSE i
l i
i 27 PROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED l
l TES I
l NO 28 RECOMMEND E DISPOSITION I
l REWORK l
l SCRAP / REJECT l
l REPAIR I
l USE AS IS 29 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEEDE l
l TES l
l NO CR NO.
30 ADDITIONAL.INFORMATION-. _
r' 31 DISTRIBUTION CONCURRENCE ACTION ORGANIZATION DATE QAD CONCURRENCE DATE ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.
(ASME) IF REQUIRED 32 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN l
l l
33 METHOD OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION NCR CLOSE BT RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION Q ACCEPTABLE l
l UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATE IF UNACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR NUMBER A.N.1. (ASME)
DATE IF REQUIRED W6 Rev 0
. m....
,_- - m.__
a
l Q-00011 page 3 of 7 1
O Consumers Power James W Ceek Vice hesadent = hojects, Engierering
\\
end Constmetion Generes oMises: 1948 West Parness meas, Jesason. MI 49201 * (S17) 788 o453 December 21, 1984 84-17 #1 Mr J C Kappler, Regional Administrator US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER PROJECT
~ -
DOCKET'NOS 50-329 AND 50-330--
~
~ ~ ~
~
~ ~~
~
~ ~ ~
~
~
~
~
DIESEL FUEL OIL TANK SOILS BORINGS FILE: 0.4.9.104 SERIAL: 32097
References:
- 1) Letter, R J Erhardt to H R Denton, Serial 32090, dated November 21, 1984
- 2) Letter, J E Brunner to ASLB Members, dated December 6, 1984 3)
'.,etter, J A Mooney to H R Denton, Serial 16881, dated May 3, 1982 On November 21, 1984, Consumers Power Cotepany (CP Co) notified your staff of a reportable condition concerning records of soils Borings B-1, B-2, B-3 and B-4.
References 1 and 2 provided additional information on this subject.
Pending resolution of our request to waive the requirement to submit a written 30-day 50.55(e) report during the project shutdown, we have prepared this interim report on the above subject.
t Description of Concern j
It has bee.n determined that the data for Borings B-1, B-2, P-3 and B-4 submitted to the NRC by references 3 and 4, presented in the Midland FSAR and in the response to 50.54(f) questions, do not represent the actual borings which were taken at the diesel generator fuel oil tank location.
Reference 2 is attached to provide a description of the situation and the concern raised as to the potential effect on analysic of liquefaction potential of the soils beneath the diesel fuel oil tanks.
Safety Impset The sole technical issue potentially affected by the invalidity of the 3
previously submitted boring logs B-1 through B-4 relates to the potential
&#R4ASY@A-iH@
Q-00011 pegs 4 of 7 2
Serial 32097 f
84-17 #1 liquefaction of the sand layer between elevations 600.5' and 603' indicated in boring DF-5.
It is our conclusion based on a conservative assessment of
~
available information that the analysis of the liquefaction potential of the soils beneath the diesel fuel oil tanks is inconclusive.
Root Cause It appears that a combination of events occurred which allowed the use.of incorrect boring logs.
1.
In June and July of 1977 respectively, the same company (Raymond) made the actual diesel fuel oil tank borings and the borings which were erroneously submitted. The borings which were mistakenly submitted related to an AT&T Project in Midland County that had no relationship to Bechtel or Consumers Power Company. The actual B-1 through B-4 borings at the Midisad jobsite were taken to obtain soil samples at the proposed location of the diesel fuel oil tanks.
2.
Both oring series were labeled B-1 through B-4 and the soil types, boring depths and taking of Shelby tube samples for the AT&T borings were, in general, similar to other borings taken at the Midland site. The AT&T borings listed the job address as Midland, Michigan.
3.
During the Site-wide soils investigation in the spring of 1979, it was determined that boring data was required in the area of the diesel generator fuel oil tanks. Bechtel personnel then recalled that borings had been made there in the summer of 1977. The Bechtel Geotechnical Engineering Group (Geotech), which was not involved in the 1977 borings, asked Project Engineering to provide the boring logs. Project Engineering believed that no drilling logs had been made for the B-1 through B-4 borings at the Midland Site. However, their response to Geotech apparently did not clearly convey this but rather it was understood by Geotech that Project Engineering didn't have any loss and not that they didn't exist.
Bechtel speculates that the handwritten drilling logs taken for the AT&T project may have been supplied by the drilling contractor (Raymond) in response to a request by Geotech for logs of the B-1 through B-4 borings taken at the Midland jobsite.
4.
In March of 1982 the handwritten B-1 through B-4 drilling logs again surfaced in conjunction with the design of the site dewatering system.
The recent Bechtel investigation indicates that one Bechtel employee believed that the handwritten driller's logs did not record borings taken in the area of the diesel fuel oil storage tanks and that there may have been discussions within Bechtel's Geotech group on this matter. Apparently a decision was made based on the available data to include these driller's logs as input to the liquefaction analysis for the buried diesel fuel oil Subsequently, Consumers Power submitted the handwritten driller's tanks.
loss to NRC informally and then via reference 3.
Bechtel prepared typewritten boring loss from the handwritten driller's 5.
logs for inclusion in the June 1982 FSAR submittal. This limited further opportunity to detect from the original driller's logs that they were incorrect nes set. nsnca. won?
Q-00011 page 5 of 7 3
Serial 32097 i
84-17 #1 as to the Midland site location since the original driller's logs were nov back in the files. The typed boring los profiles include additional information 1
which is believed to have been obtained from the test records of the borings actually taken at the Midland jobsite, such as the boring coordinates.
It is normal practice for a handwr'itten boring los to be produced at the time a boring is made. These logs are produced by the technical person overseeing the drilling operation. Information concerning boring locations is entered in the logs by such technical personnel, and thus can be directly traced to the Midland jobsite. In the case of Borings B-1 through B-4, the erroneous loss (ie, the loss of the AT&T borings) contained no location coordinates or other information directly indicating the location of the borings. Instead, the location information obtained from testing data concerning the onsite B-1 through B-4 borings was assumed to be applicable to the logs of the offsite i
borings. As previously stated, this confusion resulted in logs of the incorrect borings being submitted to the NRC. Ihe absence of location information on the drilling loss traceable to the Midland site is a l
circumstance unique -to Borings-B-1 through B-4.---
A review of all Bechtel borings incuded in Section D.1.4 of the Soils 50.54(f) response indicates that borings B-1 through B-4 are the only borings made from a driller's log. All the other borings were produced from handwritten boring logs by a Bechtel Geotechnical Engineer assigned to the drilling. The normal practice of involvement by Geotech personnel would preclude any generic repetition of the unique circumstances of this particular situation.
Corrective Action The controls in place at the time of the Project shutdown were adequate to prevent a recurrence of this problem, thus no process corrective action is necessary.
Part corrective action required includes correcting the affected documentation
~ and determining if additional analysis or additional field information is necessary to address the issue of potential liquefaction of soils below the l
diesel fuel oil tanks.
Because of the Project shutdown, these corrective actions will not be pursued and no further reports on this subject will be made unless the Midland Energy Center is reactivated. This item will be entered in our Correspondence and Commitment Management System for long-ters tracking.
JWC/JLW/ksa CC: Document Control Desk, NRC EAdensam, FPC Office of NRR Washington, DC Bethesda, MD INPO Records Center OC1284-0505A-MP02
l Q-00011 page 6 of 7' 4
Serial 32097 84-17 #1 i
i OM/0L SERVICE LIST l
\\
Mr Frank J Kelley Atomic Safety & Licensing l
Attorney General of the Appeal Board State of Michigan U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission l
i i
Ms Carole Steinberg Washington, DC 20555 Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Division Mr C R Stephens (3) 720 Law Building Chief, Docketing & Services Lansing, MI 48913 U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Secretary l
Washington, DC 20555 l
Mr Myron M Cherry, Esq Suite 3700 Ms Mary Sinclair Three First National Plaza 5711 Summerset Street
~~Chicagoi IL 60602
~~- - -
Midland, MI-48640 Mr Wendell B Marshall Mr William D Paton, Esq r
Counsel for the NRC Staff RFD 10 Midland, MI 48640 U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 i
Mr Charles Bechhoefer, Esq Atomic Safety & Licensing Atomic Safety & Licensing i
Board Panel l
Board Fanel U S Nuclear ilegulatory Commission U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission East-West Towers, Room E-413 Washington, DC 20555 Bethesda, MD 20014 Ms Barbara Stamaris 5795 North River Road Dr Frederick P Cowan Rt 3 6152 N Verde Trail Freeland, MI 48623 Apt B-125 Boca Raton, FL 33433 Dr Jerry Harbour Atomic Safety & Licensing Mr Fred C Williams Board Panel Isham, Lincoln & Beale U S Nuclear Regulatory Cossaission 1120 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 840 East-West Towers, Room E-454 Washington, DC 20036 Bethesda, MD 20014 l
Mr James E Brunner, Esq Mr M I Miller, Esq Consumers Power Company Isham, Lincoln & Beale l
212 West Michigan Avenue Three First National Plaza i
Jackson, MI 49201 52nd Floor i
Chicago, IL 60602 1
1 A P 4 8% @ D AfAf8 %FW% O 9
Q-00011 page 7 of 7 5
Serial 32097 84-17 #1 Mr Steve Cadler Esq Mr John Demeester, Esq 2120 Carter Avenue Dow Chemical Building St Paul, MN 55108 Michigan Division Midland MI 48640 Mr P Robert Brown Clark. Klein & Beaumont Ms Lynne Bernabei 1600 First Federal Bids Government Accountability. Project Woodward Ave 1901 Q Street, NW Detroit, MI 48226 Washington, DC 20009 l
ORIGINAL
'15 NCR NO.
17 REV i
QUALITY o-onnt?
_ _ o _..._
)
ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSU D M la V Aa a V
DIVISION 9-96-A%
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE i 0F 7
QAD FORM 1 1 nan LOCATION
- c. r. w -
Installed throughout HVAC systems and in HVAC storage building at the Midland Energy Center 2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REY.
3 PART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.
Model IBD-21, IBD-23 NA Ruskin Fire Dampers and NIBD-23 5 ITBt DESCRIPTION i
Ruskin Fire Dampers. Model IBD-21. IBD-23, and NIBD-23 (interlocking blade type that were supplied with closure springs.)
6 ITEM STAKTur 51azza NO.
7 Rzrr.sENCE DOCunsm 8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRED R
All HVAC systems QA-6 revision 0 no
.__ 3 9. INSPECTION-PLAN-- - - -REY 10-ACTION -ORGANIEATION -
NA Engineering Technical Support 11 ACTIVITY HOLD REQUIRED:
ACTIVITT HOLD ORDER NO.
YES y
NO 12 REQUIREMENT Section 4.2.2 of Procedure QA-6 ' revision 0 states in part: "When a nonconformance is reported to or detected by QAD personnel, QAD is responsible fors...d.
Documenting nonconformance on a NCR (Appendix A)"
13 NONCONFORMANCE A copy of a Part 21 Notice was re eived by Consumers Power Company from Ruskin Manufacturing indicating a potential problem with the fire dampers models referenced above. Specifically, the dampers may not cycle properly under normal system duct pressures.
(Reference the attached notification.)
14 NCR ORIGINATED BY 2-26'8$
l RLBishop
/
W 19 HOLD TAGS APPLIE YES y
NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TACS OR SEGREGATED ARIA i
ITEM SEGREGATED TES 1
NO NA-Tagging of these items will occur for
<e...
ek.e s.41
...e t.. A 21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 NCR REVIEW BY T'
. REPORTABILITY l
YES NO O
v DATE: 8-84p-26 22 DErIBMINED TO BE REPORTABLE 25 SECTION READ, ASSURANCE 2 TES M
g 0.4.9.105 QA-6 Rev 0
n-nnn11
.. s nr,
l26 CAUSE 1
l s
I 27 FROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED l
l TES l
l NO 28 RECGetENDED DI5rGa m 05 I
IREWDER I
l SCRAP / REJECT l
l REPAIR l
l USE AS IS 29 CONDITIONAL m m E NEEDED l
l TES l
l NO CR NO.
30 - ADDITIONAL-INFORMATION l
l 31 DISTRIBUTION CONCURRENCE ACTIS ORGANIZATIGE DATE QAD CONCURRENCE DATE ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.
(ASME) IF REQUIRED 32 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN 33 METRS OF DISPOSITION ACTIS VERIFICATION NCR CLOSED ST RESULTS OF DISFOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION l
ACCEPTABLE UNACCIFTABLE QAD DATE ACCEPTABLE, REFERENC SUPERSEDING NCR WOMBER
~
~ "
A.N.I. (ASMI)
DATE IF REQUIRED
_. e new o
I
[,
g Q-00012 pegs 3 of 7 l *;.
l,
~m Box 129 i3iTA
. e oranevi
. uissouri 64o3o s
I J
.. Phone 816 7617476 4
Q owison of Phsps Indusine u
TELEX 42 4192 i<
l
- ~
g Factories: Parsons and Great Bend Kansas; Anaheim, California; Minden, Loulslana; and Bronx, New York nepresentatives in all healer Cities November 6, 1984 Director, Office of In'spection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
10555 Sir:
- - -In - accordance-wi th - the-requi rements -of-10-CFR -pa rt-21 r Ruskin-Ma nuf acturi ng Company, located at 3900 Dr. Greaves Road, Grandview, Missouri 64030, is herewith reporting that we have discovered a deficiency with equipment furnished by Ruskin Manufacturing Company for Nuclear Power Plant application.
On August 7, 1984 Ruskin received a letter from The Waldinger Corporation addressing seven (7) fire dampers failure to close under normal duct pressure at Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station.
On August 13 1984 Ruskin visited the jobsite to inspect dampers. The results of the inspection revealed damper condition to exhibit bent blades, bent blade tracks, rust and zine rich paint on springs.
On August 20, 1984 after Engineering review of inspection results, Ruskin again visited the jobsite for Engineering review of above referenced damper conditions.
As a result of this review Ruskin recommended that the blade packages be replaced in' the affected fire dampers.
On October 30, 1984, Ruskin was notified, by The Waldinger Corporation, that the new blade packages had been installed and tested.
The fire dampers with the newly installed blade packages would still not cycle under normal duct pressure.
Ruskin Engineering immediately began to evaluate the problem to determine the cause of the dampers failure to close under~ air flow.
Results of this evaluation.
indicated the test methods originally utilized to test dampers under flow may not accurately depict actual installed conditions.
Ruskin fire dampers were tested in accordance with AMCA 500, test figure 5.5, mounted on the face of the test tunnel. Actual installed condition, in ductwork, may not result in proper performance as tested to AMCA.
Ruskin, on November 2, and 51984, performed air flow tests in accordance with AMCA 500 with damper mounted on face of tunnel as well as with damper mounted in ductwork.
The results of this test indicated that face mounted damper would close at much higher static i
l pressure than the damper which was installed in'd6ctwork.
l LOUVERS BACKDRAFT DAMPERS FIRE DAMPERS
-. _gOyTRgl DAMPERS
- e Q-00012 pass 4 of 7' November 6, 1984 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 Since no facility exists to properly test dampers under flow that would simulate all field installed conditions, and relationship between face mounted damper and damper installed in doctwork cannot be accurately calculated, Ruskin recommends that fire dampers supplied with closure springs, which require closure 'under air flow conditions, be tested to verify proper operation. This condition affects only interlocking blade fire dampers Model 180-21. IBD-23 and NIBD-23 supplied with closure springs by Ruskin.
Ruskin is currently researching methods to modify fire dampers to ensure closure wider air flow.
Attachment I to this letter identifies the affected jobsites by location and the number of units supplied to each.
L
_ - In closing,-please-find enclosed -a-copy-of-the-letter-describing-the-situation,
contained in this letter, which will be sent to each affected site.
If further questions should arise, please contact us at once.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely, RUSKIN FACTURING DI IS S
Thomas D'.' Hill President
Enclosures:
Attachment I Notification Form Letter NOTE:
For further discussions, questions, or concerns on this matter, please contact:
Richard J. Yarges Ruskin Manufacturing Division (816)761-7476 9
9 9
a O
t-Q-nnql2 page 5 ci
~
Attachment I Page 1 of 3 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Maine Yankee Atomic Power Tennessee Valley Authority Maine Yankee 400 West Sunmit Hill Drive R.R. 2 Box 3270 Knoxville, Tennessee 27902 Wiscusset, Maine 04578 11 Units 20 Units Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Diablo Canyon Tennessee Valley Authoirty Pacific Gas and E'+: -ic See Above 77 Beal St.
64 Units San Francisco, Ca'. "c nia 94106 19 Units Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Hope Creek Tennessee Valley Authority Bechtel Construction, Inc.
See Above P.O. Box 3965 344 Units San Francisco, California 94119 893 Units
..__.- ~EelWfonte Nu~c~ lear P1 ant Citnton
~
Tennessee Valley Authority Zack Company See Above 4600 W. 12th Place
- Units Chicago, Illinois 60650 262 Units uJ1ow Creek Nuclear Plant Midland
- ._ nessee Valley Authority Zack Company See Above See Above 2 ' Units 366 Units Falo Verde Nuclear Generating Station LaSalle The Waldinger Corporation Zack Company P.O. Box 215 See Above Backeye, Arizona 85326 106 Units 953 Units Turkey Point Wm. H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station Florida Power and Light Waldinger-Young & Bertke P.O. Box 3088 2601 Bell Avenue Florida City, Florida 33034 Des Moines, Iowa 50321 2 Units 5 Units W.P.P.S.S. Unit 1 Waterford #3 Bechtel Power Corporation P.O. Box 650 Louisiana Power and Light 142 Delarende St.
Richland, Washington 99352 New Orleans, Louisiana 70174 303 Units 26 Units i
l 1
Q-00012 p:sa 6 of' 7 '-
Attachment I Page 2 of 3 Quad Cities D. C. Cook Zack Company American Electric Power Service Corp.
4600 W. 12th Place P.O. Box 16631 I
Chicago, Illinois 60650 Columbus, Ohio 43216 19 Units 22 Units Morrison Construction Catawba Nuclear P.O. Box 1130 Bahnson Service Hammond, Indiana 46320 P.O. Box 384 4 Units Clover, South Carolina 29710 421 Units Perry Nuclear Millstone i
Robert Irsay Stone and Webster P.O. Box 205 P.O. Box 345 Perry, Ohio 44081 Waterford, CT.
06385 520 Units
- 17. Units Susquehanna
~ - - -
~ ~
Du W AHFold Peabody and Wind Eng. CO.
Iowa Flectric Light and Power 275 Geiger P.O. Box 351 Philadelphia, PA.
19115 Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52406 95 Units 22 Units Arkansas Nuclear One Byron Nuclear Arkansas Power and Light American Warming & Ventilating P.O. Box 551 1310 Indian Wood Circle Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 Maumee, Ohio 43537 144 Units 51 Units Monticello Braidwood Nuclear AZCO Inc.
American Warning & Ventilating
.c/o Northern States Power See Above P.O. Box 655 51 Units Monticello, Minnesota 55362 30 Units
' Comanche Peak Farley Nuclear Texas Utilities Alabama Power P.O. Box 1002 P.O. Box 2641 Glen Rose, Texas Birmingham, Alabama 35291 379 Units 72 Units South Texas Project Callaway Intermech Inc.
Bechtel Power P.O. Box 2279 15740 Shady Grove Rd.
Bay City, Texas 77414 Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877-1454 153 Units 375 Units Indian Point #3 Wolf Creek Power Authority of the State of New York Bechtel Power.,
P.O. Box 215 See Above Buchanan, New York 10511 355 Units 2 Units
Q-00012 pegs 7 of 7 Attachment I Page 3 of 3 Davis Besse W.P.P.S.S. #2 Toledo Edison W.P.P.S.S.
300 Madison Avenue P.O. Box 968 Toledo. Ohio 43652 Richland, Washington 99352 2 Ur.its 14 Units Zion.
E. I. Hatch Commonwealth Edison Bechtel Power P.O. Box 767 15740 Shady Grove Rd.
Chicago, Illinois 60690 Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877-1454 6 Units 1 Unit Oconee River Bend Mill Power Supply Stone and Webster P.O. Box 32307 P.O. Box 5200 Charlotte, North Carolina 28232 Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08034 2 Units 98 Units Oconee McGuire Bahnson Service Bahnson Service Company P.O. Box 159 P.O. Box 57 Seneca, South Carolina 29678 Cornelius, North Carolina 28031
- 26 Units 11 Units 9
O g
-e,,
,, ~. -,,. _
,_---,~-x,._,--
e.w,-
rr,
,, --, - -- +-- -
e-c---
--v-yr--we-, - -r,-wv--------
--ww-e--------r----
ORIGINAL
\\
15 NCR NO.
17 RE9 QUALITY 0-00014 0
- ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSUFD DIVISION 3-01-85 neevfVED NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE 1 0F QAD POEM 1 um e $ a;:c 1 ITEM LOCATION C. P. Co. Legal Elevation 634'6", Area 3 Auxiliary Building and Area 7 Turbine Building 2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REY.
3 PART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.
NA Purge Gage BPC-1403, BPC-1410 5 ITEM DESCRIPTION Ashcroft Pressure Gages 0-100#
Used for purge service h- (35 ],~ " ', "; &
[
.n 6 ITEM STARTUP SYSTEM NO.
7 REFERENCE DOCiTarai
~8 "ASME N.N.I. REQUIRED ij of the MEC NA QAPP for the Shutdown Phase NA i 9 INSPECTION PLAN RIV 10 ACTION ORGANIZATION NA 06M Division 11 ACTIVITT HOLD REQUIRED:
ACTIVITY HOLD ORDER NO.
TES X
NO 12 REQUIREMENT Quality Assurance Program Policy #12 requires that:
" Devices used to calibrate, measure, gauge, test or inspect Q-listed materials components, parts, systems and structures for the purpose of quality verification are controlled, calibrated and documented in accordance with approved procedures."
13 NONCONFORMANCE t
Gages used to measure the purge pressure on Unit #1 and Unit #2 Electrical Penetration Assemblies have expired calib. ration stickers.
14 NCR ORIGINATED BT l
l$
DANott
/
' DATE 19 HOLD TAGS APPLIED TES X
NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATED AREA ITEM SEGREGATED YES x
NO
~
NA 21 NEED TO REVIEW POR 23 TREND CODE 24 NCR R EW T:
I NO 3
+
DATE 58.
22 DETERMINED TO BE REPO.RTABLE 25 SECTION HEAD. AS E ENGINEERING YES X NO
)
MA,q
?.c.V
-r
/
DATE:
QA-6 Rev 0 l/ ~
0-00014 p'an 2 af 2 26 CAUSE a
27 PROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTICE REQUIRED l
l YES I
I NO
~
28 RECrnarnmED DISPOSITION l
IRDORE I
l SCRAP /RRJECT l
l REPAIR l
l USE AS IS 29 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEED E l
l YES I
l NO CR NO.
30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 31 DISTRIBUTION CONCURRBCE ACTION ORGANIZATION DATE QAD CONCURRENCE DATE ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.
(ASME) IF REQUIRED 32 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN 33 METEG) 0F DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION NCR CLOSED BY RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION W ACCEPTABLE l
l UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATE IF UNACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPER $ 2 ING NCR NUMBER A.N.I. (ASME)
DATE IF REQUIRED QA-6 Rav 0 v
,,4-w w,m
.my m,y,.
,-.awm..,,,,,.-,,--.,---
,-,-----er-,,v-m v
him?JC0?y
~
QUAL m 15 NCR NO.
17 RIV asseauct 0 - "^^ "
8 RECEIV P DIVISIS 16 DATE ISSUED FCEN QAD=1 9' 3q g gggp 1.A.as NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE 1
0F 7 e n n. r
,a--
g g
e a.
w --
Auxiliary Building, Elevation 704' 2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REY.
3 FARI NAME 4 SERIAL NO.
2.3, 2.4 Valve Actuator P.O. 7??0-M-11A(0)
Te===
2.1.
2.2.
Main Stone Isolation 6079. 6130. 6178 and 6228 5 ITEM DESCRIPTION EFCO-600 Series 600 Actuator manufactured by Gulf & Western Fluid, Systems Division, latch roller bearing.
6 ITIM STAnur SYSTIM NO.
7 Er.tr.sENCE DOCUMENT 8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRED 1 MB & 2 ABB OA-6 revision 0 NO 9 INSPECTION PLAN REV 10 ACTION ORGANIZATION MA Rneinmarine Technieml Runnart 11 ACTIVITT HOLD _ REQUIRED:
ACTIVITT HOLD ORDER NO.
YES 1 NO 12 REQUIREMENT Ssceion 4.2.2 of Procedure QA-6 revision 0 states in part:
"When a nonconformance is reported to or detected by QAD personnel, QAD is responsible for... d.
Documenting n:nconformance on a NCR (Appendix A)"
i 11 3 NONCONFORMANCE l
Natification from Gulf & western Manufacturing Company that purauant to the requirements i l cf 10 CFR 21, the Nuclear Regulatory Comunission has been notified of a failure in a i
valve actuator similar to the one used on our Main Steam Isolation Valves. See attached letters for details.
- 1) Crosby Valve & Gage Company to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, dated February 15, 1985 l 2) Culf & Western Manufacturing Company to Consumers l14 NCR ORIGINATED BY l
Power Company, dated February 13, 1985
$(Oh Yb!i5' iREWhitaker DATE i
19 HOLD TAG APPLIED r YES NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREATED AREA GREGA M M
X NO Auxiliary Building, Elevation 704' n
j/
21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 NCR R REPORTABILITY X
YES NO
[4l e
0 DATE 3/(,
s 22 DETERMINED TO BE REPORTABLE 25 SECTION HEAD, lA;SSURAKCE ENG. ERING lc 3l(of S X TES No w
(
l QA-6 Rev 1 l
,--,,---wr-a-r e=%v-w-----e-e<-
ew-.---+-,--==-rwe ww-r e
==w-w-we e==---------'e----
---am----r eww7---e-----*
v
35 PAGE A 0F 7
27 FROCESS CORRICTIVE ACTION REQUIRED l
l TES l
l NO 28 REColeGNDED DISPOSITION l
l REWORK l
l SCRAP / REJECT I
l REPAIR
- I IUSE AS IS*
- REQUIRES TECHNICAL JSUTIFICATION ATTACHED 29 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEEDED l
l YES l
l NO CR NO:
30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION v
. 31 DISPOSITION CONCURRENCE ACTION ORGANIZATION DATE QAD CONCURRENCE DATE ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.
(ASME) IF REQUIRED 32 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN I
l l
\\
33 METHOD OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION 34 NCR CLOSED BY i
RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION l
l l ACCEPTABLE l
l UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATE IF UNACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR NUMBER A.N.I.
(ASME)
DATE l
IF REQUIRED i
QA-6 Rev i l
CC* $.C &== & & 3 #
Y 0. Sc(.t.ws Crosby Valva G
.T.Z.(2) g,a,,,,3 Cage Company y,a,a..(1) p
~
^
&. n* )*t//S8 P.O. Box 306 7
43 Kendrick Street C.C.* M ~ 2 N QCQ Wrenth::n. Massachusetts 02093 Telephone: 617/384-3121 Telex: 924443 R"FES21""
1985 February 15, 1985
.oA.
Director.
Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission j
Wo.shington, D.C. 20555
,fj g M)
---Gme1 en:
n,.o.#.,z.3r-.,<._(x//'!%____
During the course of a Vibration Aging and Seismic Testing Program of an EFCO-600 Series 600 Actuator manufactured by Gulf & Western Fluid Systems Division, a latch roller bearing failure was observed. The bearing is the latching roller located on the blocking lever mechnism. These tests were being conducted under a contract from Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, the designated Architect / Engineer for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation' for the Nine Mile Point Plant. The EFCO-600 Series Actuators are quarter turn actuators used to actuate (on/off) main steam isolation valves (MSIV) that were manufactured by Gulf & Western Fluid Systems Division formerly of 25 Graystone Avenue, Warwick, El 02886.
Subsequent to the bearing failure a static load test was conducted on an identical bearing installed in the EFC0 Series 600 Actuator to determine the actual static load on the bearing. These static load tests were conducted at the Crosby Valve & Gage Company, Wrentham, Massachusetts, under contract to Stone & Webster. These tests showed that the static loads imposed on the bearing exceeded the bearing manufacturer's==vf=um published load for that bearing.. (Torrington Bearing Design Number 28NBL4855YJ.)
Since failure of the bearing in service would render the main steam i.
isolation valve inoperative, Crosby Valve & Gage Company and Gulf & Western Manufacturing Company have determined that, in their opinion, a probable cause for reporting under 10CFR21 exists.
f
,i A_world of pressure relief technology... for the future.
^
)VC R C -ccc I3 pe 4 el 2
^
U.S. Nuclear Bagulatory Commission February 15, 1985 i.,
To the best of Crosby's knowledge the following is a complete list of EFCO-600 Actuators that have been manufactured and delivered:
i Gulf & Western Shop Order Size h
owner /I4 cation
, uantity Q
1732 28" MSIY Consumer Power Corporation 4
Midland Units 1 & 2 1798 24" MSIV Duquesne Power Company 3
Beaver Valley - Unit 2 2471 20" YW1V BBC IAibstadt 2
2473 24" MSIY BBC Iaibstadt 4
_ _. - ---- 25 38 -
-24"- MSIV-Niagara-Mohwak Power-Corp.
4 Nina Mile Point 2 2540 24" MSIY Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
4 Nine Mile Point 2 Gulf & Western Manufacturing Company of 26261 Evergreen Road, Southfield, Michigan 48076, has notified the Consumer Power Corporation, Duquesne Power Company and BBC Leibstadt of the test results and the possibility that the latch roller bearings in their actuators may be subject to failure under similar test conditions. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation has been advised of the bearing problem by Stone & Webster.
Work has begun on the design of a new bearing and retrofit package
, for this application in anticipation of specific direction from Gulf & Western Manufacturing Company and Stone & Webster.
Very truly yours, W. D. Greenlaw Vice President - Engineering WoG/da 6
Distribution List Attached j
$h it., %
,V
'[
S g,
e e
,-_c,.m
Nct c - cce
- 3 me S e5 */
e U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Pebruary 15, 1985 Distribution List ec:
M. Bauer Gulf & Western Manufacturing Company 26261 Evergreen Road Southfield, Michigan 48076 cc:
E. Doppelt Gulf & Western Manufacturing Company 1 Gulf & Western Plaza New York, New York 10023 s
ec: Mr. V. A. Anderson Director of Purchasing Consumers Power Company 212 West Michigan Avenue
~ ~ ~ ~ ~-- JacksonTMichigan 49201 cc: Mr. B. A. Van Wassen Project Manager Duquesne Light Company 435 Sixth Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 cc: Earnkraftverk Iaibstadt AH l
CR 4353 Leibstadt, SWIT m r m cc: Mr. J. T. Niezabytowski Manager Contract Ad=inistration Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Blvd. West Syracuse, New York 13202 cc:
- 1. G. Friend - Crosby J. J. Greene - Crosby 1
R. T. Levis Crosby i
l J. P. Walter - Crosby e
O 9
( C.K+4'08KM4y(1.)dyst. ' ' /- f.d.,0
[ '.
@ 1. ( 2)
Nc4 4.cee s3 l
OR. I 5. 15/ M tild l' T G 'S '
G Gulf + Western ec **W h " A g " L a g
Manufacturing Company 8a ** * *'
Samna Mie February 13, 19
[Q[ly[
FEDERAL EXPRESS MAILING FEr3 21 1985 9
to
-QA-Attention:
Mr. V. A. Anderson g.c o#
Director of Purchasing 3.w$g?q RfP CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY Q;> 0E k$* #.(y os 212 West Michigan Avenue Jackson, Michigan 49201 s
Re:
EFCO-600 MAIN STEAM ISOLATION g'
VALVE ACTUATOR
/
A
( Va&, v44-g3gyq/
d, 7
Dear Mr. Anderson:
7 g g o A
pyg y o.rg We understand that your facility purchased four (4) EFCO-600 Main Steam Isolation Valve Actuators in 1978-79.
Crosby Valve &
Gage Company
(" Crosby"),
which purchased the Fluid Systems Division from Gulf & Western Manufacturing Company in 1983, has advised us that a Vibration Aging and Seismic Testing Program conducted on a similar Actuator has resulted in the failure of the Actuator's latch roller bearing No. 28N8L48554J.
The load test results are summarized below:
1.
Strainsert i Q7448-1 A.
4-Runs B.
Average Force Equals 103,670 Lbs.
2.
Strainsert f Q7448-2 A.
4-Runs i
B.
Average Force Equals 104,465 Lbs.
The purpose' of this letter is to notiify you that the latch roller bearings contained in the EFCO-600 Main Steam Isolation Valve Actuators sold to your facility. are identical to the bearing tested by Crosby, and to alert you to the possibility that the latch roller bearings in your Actuators may be subject to failure under similar test conditions.
i Crosby has advised us that it has determined that the hydraulic latching pressure of your Actuator is approximately the same-as that of the test Actuator, and therefore the static load imposed on the present bearing exceeds the bearing manufacturer's published maximum rated load for that bearing.
/vce g.oec S (vy 7ef 7 i
Page Two February 13, 1985 EFCO-600 MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE ACTUATO_R_
Crosby is working on the design of a new bearing for this application.
Notification will be issued upon completion of this design effort.
In the meantime it is strongly reconenended that none of the EFCO-600 Main Steam Isolation Valve Actuators in your pe: session be installed, or, if already installed, that due consideration be given to the effects on the nuclear steam supply system should the bearing fail and the valve become inoperative.
Crosby has agreed to notify the Nuclear Regulatory Comunission pursuant to 10CFR 521.
Any questions you have concerning the points raised in esis~
letter should be directed to:
William D. Greenlaw Vice President-Engineering Crosby Valve & Gage Company P. O. Box 308 43 Kendrick Street Wrentham, Massachusetts 02093 Telephone:
(617) 384-3121 Very truly yours, GULF & WESTERN MANUFACTURING COMPANY onauuaapauw
~
J MICHAEL J. BAUER Resident Counsel (313) 355-8105
/cw i
~
DRMAL
'15 NCR NO.
17 REY QUALITY 0-00014 0
- ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSUED DIVISION 3-01-85 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE 1 0F 9
QAD FORM 1 1 ITEM LOCATION Elevation 634'6", Area 3 Auxiliary Building and Area 7 Turbine Building 2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REV.
3 PART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.
NA Purge Gage BPC-1403, BPC-1410 3
5 ITEM DESCRIPTION 3ECELV L Ashcroft Pressure Gages 0-100#
Used for purge service MM 03 31 C. P. Co. LeC 6 ITEM STARTUP SYSTEM NO.
7 REFERENCE DOCUMENT 8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRED of the MEC NA QAPP for the Shutdown Phase NA i
j9 INSPECTION PLAN REV 10 ACTION ORGANIZATION NA O&M Division 11 ACTIVITT HOLD REQUIRED:
ACTIVITY HOLD ORDER NO.
TES X
NO NA 12 REQUIREMENT Quality Assurance Program Policy #12 requires that:
" Devices used to calibrate, measure, gauge, test or inspect Q-listed materials components, parts, systems and structures for the purpose of quality verification are controlled, calibrated and documented in cccordance with approved procedures."
13 NONCONFORMANCE l
Gages used to measure the purge pressure on Unit #1 and Unit #2 Electrical Penetration Assemblies have expired calibration stickers.
14 NCR ORIGINATED BT
(
/
II DANo t t ' /
DATE 19 HOLD TAGS APPLIED TES X NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATED AREA ITEM SEC2EGATED TES X
NO NA
_21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 NCR R EW ST:
a
/
REPORTABILITY W3' TES 1 NO 3
e f, ? - 6 8 DATE:
22 DETERMINED TO BE REPORTABLE 25 SECTION HEAD. ASSURANCE ENGINEERING DATE: MM D I'.0' '
QA-6 Rav 0
,//
l
i Q-00014 page 2 of 2
?26 CAUSE IHEL6 2
C* AGES THAT ARE uh7 TO Moc tTcE, MiTP.o6Eu Pu e_c,E l
0 7f.i1MOL6 On 7 Af, huR,T1LtCAt.
EuCTRJrTtod kTMk6 W E 7.E, htK t bENTGiEh 9tT Tad 'T Nd 09 3.AuT hotM M MEDiML, 'Tb '&E LE9r i M.
j GALib2ATicfd TAE1f. kM, A10 7foche.Aot N EL-rAAL suCD To MM uTAtM g
-TWgg, 1WD GAG &.
/
27 PROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRE IV I YES l
l NO 28 REColeGNDED DISFOSITION Iv iREWORK 1
l SCRAP / REJECT l
l REPAIR I
lUSE AS IS 29 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEEDED l
l YES l V l NO CR NO.
30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION k
MALMT6M AMC.5 (doQl Of 6ET.,
I( {2:4.t M b 7MFAf_ED To ETod6 "Te6 2, 6k6s&, 0_ALi STATE TAGM Aub EETOP_Al Twe.M Tb SEV.R E,
6egs ism 1 i luio (9c.D tau _
M, 7t.v_cn iu oua EE-CAu mm 31 DISTRI ION ONCURRENCE
/U2.
b J-f-EC Jh0YY 3/g/9s' ACTIOR ANIZATION DATE QAD CONCURRENCE
'/
DATE S'W 5 bllA FfGINEERING DATE A.N.I.
(ASME) IF REQUIRED 32[ISPOSITIONACTIONTAKEN SE,moV60; C ALtdazATCO y 2ETv &E O To S S C.WCf-DAM.S l403kiLllO,
~jg'~ gS 2. Gigc63 Al2E Alo< d /^/ A 2Ec Ac C.
S y s 7*f m uT/U EIN'4 N /71/r?$ '.'
0;yt/r7[ t ? S*Q02 b5 I
g/A CErl' /7$0-N0(x f[$f/77fO
/
33 METHOD OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION-NCR CLOSED BY WolMssed cn/;butoba e$ GM,ss ned Rawsin//*few see WC. co n s,5' RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION j
l V l ACCEPTABLE I
l UNACCEPTABLE QAD
'DATE IF UNACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR NUnBER nIn A> /A
)
A.N.I.
(ASME)
DATE IF REQUIRED QA-6 Rev 0 4
.._,_,__,_s.
f*, p a a.3.b.Nhnd bY"-??
t.
5 QUALITY 15 NCR NO.
17 REV l ASSURANCE d2-ooo/S o
. DIVISION 1 16 DATE ISSUED
!F0PM QAD-1 8
J-u. f.-r NONCONFORMANCE REPORT l
l 18 PAGE [
OF 2.
oe<'rrv ED I ITEM LOCATION Lini1 e Sada
.Sih vcR :n ' ns 2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REV.
3 MART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.
C. R Co. Legal 1/A AJA LJA 5 ITEM DESCRIPTION udt e &acfor Csoled hn,a Snubbar Hydrauls.
& slam 6 I@EM STARTUP SYSTEM NO. s REF C
'MDIT 8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRED DA L)o 10 ACT ORGANIZATION 9 INSPECTION PLAN REV 6parNIOims 4 A1ainkt.n.anca B.,VI3 ton
[t)b-g235 a
II ACTIVITY HOLD REQUIRED:
ACTIVITY HOLD ORDER NO.
YES N NO d)d 12 REQUIREMST inuk declar eesaaesa lh Plan
.sfa 3
.s/afas in fluu art.. ' c) of hiy/ra p/aaga.ydc for.scna c
13 NONCONFORMANCE 5nabbar Hgrau/ic Sysfam s c t-l and c >-e-l hava fkic/
kakmi Esm c3round valvas l
I l
' 2)n&l or -fIhllnts, 4 N ORIGINATED BY j
\\.
O
.3-M-Bs
- J DATE 19 HOLD TAG APPLIED 1 YES NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREATED AREA ITEMS SEGREGATED YES 1 N0 dM hpk2u//c SqMhWS 21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR l23 TREND CODE l24 NCR El.N 4.
REPORTABILITT YES
/ NO l
l DATE 3/
f 22 DEIERMINED TO BE REPORTABLE 25 SECTION HEAD, ASSURANCE ENGINEERING YES
/NO g
QA-6 Rev i
26 CAUSE d.ooo<s 35 PAGE J OF J adbed. f ht &
W"'fD e$
Ec G C C 41C 0f
- h. roc 27 PROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED l
l YES NO 28 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION l
l l
l REWORK l
l SCRAP / REJECT l
l REPAIR
- USE AS IS*
l CREOUIRES TECHNICAL JSUTIFICATION ATTACHED x
29 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEEDED l
lYES I \\XI NO CR NO:
30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION i
D m
31 DISPOSITION CONCURRENCE 0L of88 J/a7/ar \\ -A 8
$ t., e5 j
CTION ORGAN ATI K DAT QAKfgpCURRENCE DATE
/
/
s 7
G/J7 4')
dA ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.
(ASME) IF REOUIRED g'f, gg '.
32 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN J' "' bA C '
5 fagovecataug is o4 Wo*LC o f,5 fff f'!2
y s Jpue,,ahl c.m;he niu~<< as >~ Lesme ~ea
\\
- f" AM M Ausd l'W
'pds anae cuacford /h 9
by gbso ><
cu Narc ~ Md dS A A"N U"' #
D wlc. ~2e '~7 veses si 7 s4'dc7~ #hai h $ ve ap w s: o,ed&es Y
Ya hsx g
iv17~' s 3cAeaeacy (.shv.s tal sie7*-2c ske cualed' i N
~~5Itw/ b aN-j l
23 METHOD OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION 34 NCR CIOSED BY l
Ol u
/Qf)
W/ &
- A l
RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION l
b=&lffd ACCEPTABLE l
l UNACCEPTABLE DATE
]
I
'NACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR NUMBER M
A. N. I.
(ASME)
DATE IF REQUIRED QA-6 Rav i
.. -. - ~. -. - - -..
RE030 COPY QUALITY 15 NCR NO.
17 REV ASSURANCE 0-00016 0
DIVISION i 16 DATE ISSUED R E C r. i V I,D FORM QAD-1 3/27/85 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT D
l 18 PAGE 1 0F L L ITEM LOCATION C.P.Co.LeGGI Various Locations in the Auxiliary, Building and Service Water Pump Structure 2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REV.
3 PART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.
NA See block #5 NA 5 ITEM DESCRIPTION Digital Voltmeter Linear Variable Differential Transformers Thermocouple Readers 6 ITEM STARTUP SYSTEM NO.
7 REFERENCE DOCUMENT 8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRED NA Procedure OP-2M NA 9 INSPECTION PLAN REV 10 ACTION ORGANIZATION NA Operations and Maintenance Division (0&M) 11 ACTIVITY HOLD REQUIRED:
ACTIVITY HOLD ORDER NO.
YES X
NO NA
- 12 REQUIREMENT Procedure OP-21' revision 6. Table OP 2-1-M establishes the calibration frequency for instruments used in the Building and Underpinning Monitoring System. The calibration
~
frequency for the equipment in block #5 is shown to be annual.
13 NONCONFORMANCE i
Contrary to the requirements shown in Table OP 2-1-M calibration due dates for equipment listed in block #5 has been exceeded as follows:
Digital Voltmeter calibration due 1/12/85 Linear Variable Differential Transformers (18) calibration due 10/12/84 Thermocouple Readers calibration due 12/27/84 NOTE: Form 40, dated 3/21/85, received from Rod (14 NCR ORIGINATED BY Wielandagreeswiththeabovecalibrationdates.l DANott t
DATE 19 HOLD TAG APPLIED YES X
NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREATED AREA ITEMS SEGREGATED YES L NO NA 21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 B
REPORTABILITY YES Y NO (Ar 3
DATE 3.;27 rr i
i22 DETERMINED TO BE REPORTABLE 25 SECTION HEA&, ASSURANCE ENGINEERING YES NO RA h1A QA-6 Rev 1
!26 CAUSE 35 PAGE
.J OF J 27 PROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED l
lYES I
l NO 28 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION l
l REWORK l
l SCRAP / REJECT l
l REPAIR
- l l USE AS IS*
CREQUIRES TECHNICAL JSUTIFICATION ATTACHED 29 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEEDED l
l YES I
l NO CR NO:
30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 31 DISPOSITION CONCURRENCE ACTION ORGANIZATION DATE QAD CONCURRENCE DATE ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.
(ASME) IF REOUIRED 32 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN 33 METHOD OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION 34 NCR CLOSED BY RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION l
l ACCEPTABLE l
l UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATE IF UNACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR NUMBER i
A.N.I.
(ASME)
DATE IF REQUIRED QA-e Rav 1
~4 E0RDC0??
'qUALITT 15 NCR NO.
17 REV ASSURANCE o.00o17 o
DIVISION 16 DATE ISSUED FORM QAD-1 3/29/85 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT l 18 PAGE 1 0F 2 1 ITEM LOCATION a t. U n i V L U Diesel Generator Building ga e 7 :::
2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REV.
'3 PART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.
C P. Co. Lecal P.O. 7220-M-18 Check Valve NA 5 ITEM DESCRIFTION Check Valve in the On-Engine Mounted Starting Air Piping 6 ITDt STARIvr SYSTDL NO.
7 RIFERENCE DOCUMEni 8 ASME A.N. I. REQUIRED i
QA-6, revision 1 NA
,9 INSPECTION PLAN REV 10 ACTION ORGANIZATION NA Engineering Technical Support 11 ACTIVITY HOLD REQUIRED:
ACTIVITT HOLD ORDER NO.
YES X
NO NA 12 REQUIREMENT Section 4.2.2 of procedure QA-6, revision 1 states in part:
"When a nonconformance is reported to or detected by QAD personnel, QAD is responsible for:... d. Documenting nonconformance on a NCR (Appendix A)".
13 NONCONFORMANCE A copy of a part 21 notice was received by CPCo from Transamerica Delaval Incorporated l
indicating a potential probica with the check valve in the On-Engine Mounted Starting Air Piping.
Reference attached part 21 notification letter, dated March 12, 1985, I
from Transamerica Delaval.
,14 NCR ORIGINATED BY
_ __Yn A
.WNW MCBut terfielc. [
'DATE 19 HOLD TAG APPLIED YES x NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREATED AREA ITEMS SEGREGATED YES X
NO g
21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR l23 TREND CODE 24 NCR REJV EWED B
/
l i
REPORTABILITY X YES NO l 5
1 DATE /// //5 0
22 DETERMINED TO BE REPORIABLE
'25 SECTION H5'
, AS URANC NGINEERING g/
X YES N0 y
pg QA-6 Rev i
35 PAGE 2 0F 2 27 PROCESS CORRICTIVR ACTION REQUIRED l
I YES l
l NO 28 RECOMhuuED DISPOSITION I
IREWORK I
lSCRAP/ REJECT I
IREPAIR*
l lUSE AS IS*
- REQUIRES TECHNICAL JSUTIFICATION ATTACHED 29 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEEDED l
l YES I
l NO CR NO:
30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 31 DISPOSITION CONCURRENCE ACTION ORGANIZATION DATE QAD CONCURRENCE DATE ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.
(ASME) IF REOUIRED 33 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN
{
l i
i i
i I
i33 METHOD OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION 34 NCR CLOSED BY I
RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION I
l l ACCEPTABLE l
l UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATE IF UNACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR NUMBER A.N. I. (ASME)
DATE :
IF REOUIRED
{
QA-6 Rev L
D laval
- " * ^ -
P.O. soi 2141 Oehlerut. Califom6a Setti pisi sn.7a March 14,1985 Director, Office of Ir% tion & Ehforcement U.S. Itaclear Ragplatory C*=sim Washington, D.C.
20555 g,l a h Daar Sir cr Flamas refer to imy letter of March 1985 idtich described a poe H=1 problem with a Qiack Valve in accordance with 10CFR21.
I would like to correct a stataeant I nude in the last aantance of the third >- - 2..
Grand did not perfona an IPI inwtion of the Valve Disk'. The 2 I stated were ok were vt==lly ex-sadnad mly.
In the fourth p-=-
- 2i I stated the Valves were supplied by the Willims Gauge Co. (*114-a-Hager) of PittsburEh. 1he W114-Gauss Co. was purchased by the Clay Corporations of n=ir=1 Ious and the nonsplates of the Valves will show Clay Corporations as well as W114mma-Hager.
We will sand of this letter to all the Sites listed in
- ==- -p 2 of the March 12, 1985 letter as indicated in the cc's.
Very truly yours,
- a. z. nos r Hunaser, quality Assurance EIN i
I i
.-.-.---,._,.,__n,
,-,,_a-,
,~,_n,_
- - ~ - -., -,,_,_,,
n
i OICssOcass :ssus Eaeia* *ao comoreseot omsson Delaval
==~
p.o. s ates oemas, cat.,n= essai m sn.noo 1
?
March 12,1985 Director, Office of Inspectim & Enforcammt U.S. Its: lear Regulatory Comunissim Washingem D.C.
20555
Dear Sir:
In accordance with the requirementa af Title 10. W-10, Code of Federal Resplations, Part 21, Transamerica Delaval Inc.,
hereby notifies the CamuLasim af a pe*-aH-1 defect in a ccm-ponent af a DER or DSRV Stansby Diesel Geerator. There could esist a potential problan with a Qieck Valve in the Gn-engine Mamted Starting Air Piping idiich could result in Ehgine non-availability.
Traissmarica Dalaval has agplied the DER snd DetV Ehgines with the potaitial defect to the following sites:
Utility Site Serial No. Model Island Lighting Shoreham 74010/12 DER 48 e South EnerEY Gned Gulf 74033/36 DSRV 16 Galf States Utilities River Band 74039/40 DMR 48 Duka Power Coupany Catawba 75017/20 DSRV 16 Southern Califamia FAf ann San Qiofra 75041/42 DSRV 20 Conmasers Power Midimwi 77001/04 DERV 12 l
StD Rancho Seco 81015/16 DSR 48 At Grand Galf an March 11, during operational tasting an Ehgina 74033, finnes were meia i coedng out af a flexible coupling on the Air Start Hender Assembly. The Ehgins was shutdown and tsaber 6 right bank Air Start Valve was removed. A 3/8 diamatar, 7/8 long non-magnetic piace ins observed lying on top af the Piston. This resultad in further asundnation, and it is felt that this piece brcka off of a Starting Air Qteck Valve Disk. 1his Disc has a top snd a bottan guide. It appears this piece broka aff of the bottom guida. There are 4 of these Valves on the RV 16 Grand Gulf checked the other 3.
One of these was cracked the other 2 were ok. IPI ses used to check these Valves.
These Qieck Valves were sqplied by the W1111 mas Gatyp Co.
l (Williams-Hager) of PittsburEh, PA. They were installed on the Ehgine by Transamerica Delaval.
ksnd Gulf has the failed parts. 1 hey are conducting an investigation to detenmine the cause of failure.
Trananmenca Delaval T
\\
March 12,1985 Page 2 U. S. Eclear Fr1= tory Mmaim i
I 1 this failure, e d We have contacted the Humfacturer to +begin their investigation.
will meet with them March 13 so that they i
In the anon time, our reconnundatim for corrective action is to di===Mle the Qisch Valves cut the Ibgine ed inspect the Disk Guide for cracks 011). Attached is a copy of the assembly drawing of this Valve showing the area of concern.
We will inform all the sites listed in Paragraph 2 en this letter af this pocantial problan by sending them copias of this letter as indicated on the cc's.
Since action is required by others, we camot estinata at this i
tima dwt the final corrective action will be coupleta. We will l
kasp you informed of our progress.
l Our evaluation of the potential probism was coupleted on March 12, i
1985. We were informed by Grand Gulf of the potential problem lata en March 11, 1985.
Very truly yours, I
I
\\
R. E. Boyer Manager, Quality Assurance l
i i
I j
l i
Attachments i
a
-,-,-._-.-..,,n
4r 1
N1 BODY------
fsss j_1 s C
3 I /
- 2 SPRINCP ---
l l
a m
/
- 3 DISC--- --< /
/
/
- 4 SEAT RINGi -
g OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS A Aemove vetve from kne.
5 Turn vetve to rest on outlet face with the meet face. sword TNs wdt remove sonng tensson agamst Seat Reg (Part No 4)
C Unscrew Seat Reg (Part No. 4). TNs is febreated with a loose fit to insure easy removat.
O Remove Disc (Part No. 3) and Spnng (Part No. 2).
E ReassemO6e Dy insertmg Sonng (Part No. 2). Disc (Part No. 3) and screw in Seat Rmg (Part No. 4) untd d hits the depin stop which is part of Body (Part No.1). Seat Rang (Part No. 4) wid then be flush with Body (Part No.1).
F.
Remstas valve in Ione makmg sure flow arrow on valve body is in the same dwection as flow through Valve.
G.
Gasket on the elet sede of veno (Seat Ring No. 4 sede) must completely seat Seat Rird thread to prevent leakage H Ordenng Information) - (1) Seze (2) Pressure Ordhng (3) Figure Number (4) Senal Number (5) Metal Specifcat on (Bronze or Stamiess Steen.
THE WILLIAMS GAUGE CO. INC.
i
,,,..._v_____,__ _ -. - - - -_ - _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _.. _. _,