ML20115F259
| ML20115F259 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 10/15/1992 |
| From: | Horn G NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20115F261 | List: |
| References | |
| NSD921020, NUDOCS 9210230015 | |
| Download: ML20115F259 (2) | |
Text
.
ys '_..,
GENERAL OFFICE P C. 00X 499. COLUMBUS. NEBRASKA 686024499 (w jj ' Nebraska Public Power District
- T#%72!s"
J m
- - -_=.====ggw==
=. -. =. ~
n====mgmgn==.
NSD921020 October 15, 1992 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attentien: Document Con col Desk Washington, D.C.
20555 Gentlemen:
Subject:
Revision to Proposed Change No. 100 to Technical Specifications Elimination of Main Steam Line Radiation Monitor Scram and Isolation Functions Cooper Nuclear Station NRC Docket No. 50-298, DPR-46
Reference:
Letter from G. R. Horn (NPPD) to NRC dated May 4,1992, " Elimination of Main Steam Line Radiation Monitor Scram and Isolation Functions, Cooper Nuclear Station, NRC Docket No. 50-298, DPR-46" The Nebraska Public Power District (District) requests that Proposed Change No. 100, submitted May 4, 1992 (Reference), be revised to accurately reference the relocation of the Mechanical Vacaum Punp Isolation surveillance requirements requested in that proposed change. Proposed Change No. 100 u: quested the NRC to revise the Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS) Technical Specifications to eliminate the operability requirements, action statements, and associated surveillance requirements for the Main Steam Line Radiation Monitor (MSLRM) scram and Croup 1 Containment Isolation functions.
Currently, Section 4.2.D.5 on page 48 of the CNS Technical Speelfications re fe rence s Tables 4.1.1, 4.1.2, and 4.2.D as the location for the Mechanical Vacuum Pump 1 solation surveillance requirements.
Proposed Change No. 100, if approved, would relocate these surveillance requirements to Tables 4.2. A and 4.2.D of the CNS Technical Specifications. Hcwever, in Proposed Change No. 100, the District inadvertently omitted the revision to Section 4.2.D.5 which would correctly reference the proposed relocation of these surveillance requirements, i.e., deleting reference to Tables 4.1.1 and 4.1.2, and adding reference to Table 4.2.A.
The attached proposed revision to page 48 of the CNS Technical Specifications, if included with Proposed Change No. 100, would correct this deficiency.
Therefore, the District requests that the attached revision be incorporated in Proposed Change No. 100.
0000'20 9210230015 921015
,e PDR ADOCK 05000290
)
P PDH I
pEGEZ2sa~MTREMWE?ET#mWWCIZINfGEEGq
~9:
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 of 2 October 15, 1992 Since this revision to Proposed Change No. 100 is editorial in. nature, this revision does not impact the District's Significant Hazards evaluation contained -
in the reference.
Please contact me if you have any questions or require any additional information.
Sinc rely, h
G. R Horn Nuc car Power Group Manager CRH/MJB Attachment cc:
H.R. Borchert Department of Health State of Nebraska NRC Regional Administrator Region IV Arlington, TX NRC Resident Inspector Cooper Nuclear Station k
s
<w
-~
r a
y,s t