ML20113F079

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NRR E-mail Capture - Opportunity to Review and Comment on an NRC Proposed Information Collection NRC CUI Program Challenge Request Process
ML20113F079
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/22/2020
From: Michael Mahoney
NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL2-1
To: Zaremba A
Duke Energy Carolinas
References
NRC-2019-0239
Download: ML20113F079 (5)


Text

From:

Mahoney, Michael Sent:

Wednesday, April 22, 2020 1:44 PM To:

Art Zaremba Cc:

Mensah, Tanya

Subject:

Opportunity to review and comment on an NRC proposed information collection NRC CUI Program Challenge Request Process" Attachments:

85FR21475.pdf

Art, The Nuclear Regulatory Commission recently published a Federal Register Notice announcing our intent to submit an information collection requests to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for NRC CUI Program Challenge Request Process. A supporting statement describing the requested information and burden estimates are available at http://regulations.gov by searching Docket No. NRC-2019-0239.

As a potential respondent to this information collection, we are interested in your feedback. Specifically, we are seeking input on the following questions by June 16, 2020:

1. Is the proposed collection of information necessary for the NRC to properly perform its functions? Does the information have practical utility?
2. Is the burden estimate accurate?
3. Is there a way to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected?
4. How can the burden of the information collection be minimized, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology?

Comments can be submitted by going to http://www.regulations.gov and searching for Docket No. NRC-2019-0239. Please note that comments will be made available for public inspection.

Because your comments will not be edited to remove any identifying or contact information, the NRC cautions you against including any information in your submission that you do not want to be publicly disclosed.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Tanya Mensah (Tanya.Mensah@nrc.gov, 301-415-3610) or myself.

Thanks Mike Michael Mahoney Oconee, McGuire and Catawba Project Manager, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Desk: (301)-415-3867 Email: Michael.Mahoney@NRC.GOV

Hearing Identifier:

NRR_DRMA Email Number:

544 Mail Envelope Properties (MN2PR09MB35175E7134981ED4CB69A830E5D20)

Subject:

Opportunity to review and comment on an NRC proposed information collection NRC CUI Program Challenge Request Process" Sent Date:

4/22/2020 1:43:53 PM Received Date:

4/22/2020 1:43:56 PM From:

Mahoney, Michael Created By:

Michael.Mahoney@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Mensah, Tanya" <Tanya.Mensah@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Art Zaremba" <Arthur.Zaremba@duke-energy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

MN2PR09MB3517.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1908 4/22/2020 1:43:56 PM 85FR21475.pdf 555179 Options Priority:

Normal Return Notification:

No Reply Requested:

No Sensitivity:

Normal Expiration Date:

Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 75 / Friday, April 17, 2020 / Notices 21475 No. 703 519 8579; or email at PRAComments@NCUA.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Address requests for additional information to Mackie Malaka at the address above or telephone 703 548 2704.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB Number: 3133 0151.

Title:

Leasing, 12 CFR part 714.

Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.

Abstract:

s Regulations requires a federal credit union engaged in leasing to obtain or have on file financial documentation demonstrating that the guarantor of an estimated residual value has the resources to meet the guarantee.

Estimated residual value is the projected future value of leased property at lease end. The accuracy of the estimated residual values used in a lease program is a fundamental element in the success or failure of a lease program. The higher concerning: (a) Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper execution of the function of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the estimate of the burden of the collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of the information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

By Gerard Poliquin, Secretary of the Board, the National Credit Union Administration, on April 14, 2020.

Dated: April 14, 2020.

Mackie I. Malaka, NCUA PRA Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 2020 08188 Filed 4 16 20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7535 01 P SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David Cullison, Office of the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555 0001; telephone: 301 415 2084; email: Infocollects.Resource@

nrc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments A. Obtaining Information Please refer to Docket ID NRC 2019 0239 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this action by any of the following methods:

Federal Rulemaking website: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search the estimated residual values used by a federal credit union, the greater the for Docket ID NRC 2019 0239. A copy of the collection of information and potential for loss. To mitigate this risk, the leasing rule requires that if the amount of the estimated residual value relied on by the federal credit union to satisfy the full payout lease requirement exceeds 25 percent of the original cost of the leased property, the credit union must obtain a guarantee of the excess from a financially capable party. If the guarantor cannot meet its guarantee, a federal credit union may suffer serious financial loss. Accordingly, it is important that a federal credit union documents that a guarantor has the financial resources and capability to meet the guarantee. If the guarantor is an insurance company, the federal credit union may satisfy this record keeping requirement by obtaining and maintaining information demonstrating that the insurance company has a rating equivalent to a B+ or better from a major rating company.

Affected Public: Private Sector: Not-for-profit institutions.

Estimated No. of Respondents: 68.

Estimated No. of Responses per Respondent: 5.

Estimated Total Annual Responses:

340 Estimated Burden Hours per Response: 2.

Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 680.

Request for Comments: Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and included in the request for Office of Management and Budget approval. All comments will become a matter of public record. The public is invited to submit comments NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[NRC 2019 0239]

Information Collection: NRC CUI Program Challenge Request Process AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Proposed information collection; request for comment.

SUMMARY

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites public comment on this proposed collection of information. The information collection Challenge Request DATES: Submit comments by June 16, 2020. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the Commission is able to ensure consideration only for comments received on or before this date.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:

Federal Rulemaking website: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC 2019 0239. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document.

Mail comments to: David Cullison, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Mail Stop: T 6 A10M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555 0001.

For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting comments, related instructions may be obtained without charge by accessing Docket ID NRC 2019 0239on this website.

Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/

adams.html. To begin the search, select ADAMS Public Documents Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.

Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1 800 397 4209, 301 415 4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. A copy of the collection of information and related instructions may be obtained without charge by accessing ADAMS Accession No. ML19317D847. The draft OMB Supporting Statement for NRC CUI Program Challenge Request Form is available in ADAMS under Accession ML19317D721.

Clearance Officer: A copy of the collection of information and related instructions may be obtained without Officer, David Cullison, Office of the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555 0001; telephone: 301 415 2084; email: Infocollects.Resource@

nrc.gov.

B. Submitting Comments Please include Docket ID NRC 2019 0239 in the subject line of your comment submission, in order to ensure that the NRC is able to make your

21476 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 75 / Friday, April 17, 2020 / Notices comment submission available to the public in this docket.

The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact information in comment submissions that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at https://

www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions into ADAMS, and the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove identifying or contact information.

If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be publicly disclosed in their comment submission.

Your request should state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove such information before making the comment submissions available to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS.

II. Background In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.

Chapter 35), the NRC is requesting public comment on its intention to roval for the information collection summarized below.

1. The title of the information collection:NRC CUI Program Challenge Request
2. OMB approval number: 3150 XXXX.
3. Type of submission: New.
4. The form number, if applicable: N/

A.

5. How often the collection is required or requested: On occasion.
6. Who will be required or asked to respond: Authorized holders, including any individual or organization who has been provided with CUI and has a lawful government purpose to possess CUI.
7. The estimated number of annual responses: 12.
8. The estimated number of annual respondents: 12.

government purpose to possess the information. Any authorized holder who believes that the designation of specific information as CUI is improper or incorrect, or who believes they have received unmarked CUI, may use this process to formally notify the NRC CUI Senior Agency Official (SAO). The process also allows for the NRC CUI SAO and CUI Program Manager to process such requests and to issue a Final Decision from the CUI SAO.

The CUI Challenge Request Process is not intended to be used to address all disagreements regarding the proper designation of CUI. Authorized holders are encouraged to seek or utilize less formal means when resolving internal good faith disputes over the proper designation of information as CUI, such as discussion with the creator or designator of the information in dispute.

Where resolution cannot be achieved through less formal means, the CUI challenge request process is available.

The CUI Challenge Request Process does not supersede any obligations under law or NRC policy to report information spills.

III. Specific Requests for Comments The NRC is seeking comments that address the following questions:

1. Is the proposed collection of information necessary for the NRC to properly perform its functions? Does the information have practical utility?
2. Is the estimate of the burden of the information collection accurate
3. Is there a way to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected?
4. How can the burden of the information collection on respondents be minimized, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology?

Dated: April 14, 2020.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

David C. Cullison, NRC Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2020 08130 Filed 4 16 20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590 01 P

SUMMARY

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is withdrawing Format and Content of Safeguards RG 5.56 is being withdrawn because it contains regulatory guidance that is out of date and not currently necessary.

DATES: The withdrawal of RG 5.56 takes effect on April 17, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC 2020 0057 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information regarding this document.

You may obtain publicly-available information related to this document using any of the following methods:

Federal Rulemaking website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC 2020 0057. Address questions about NRC docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges; telephone: 301 287 9127; email:

Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document.

Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/

adams.html. To begin the search, select Web-based ADAMS For problems with ADAMS, please contact (PDR) reference staff at 1 800 397 4209, 301 415 4737, or by email to pdr.resource@

nrc.gov. The basis for withdrawal of RG 5.56 is available in ADAMS under Accession No. ML20030A085.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Albert N. Tardiff, telephone: 301 287 3613, email: Al.Tardiff@nrc.gov, or Mekonen Bayssie, telephone: 301 415 1699, email: Mekonen.Bayssie@nrc.gov; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555 0001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background RG 5.56 was published for comment in March 1978 to provide guidance on

9. The estimated number of hours needed annually to comply with the the development of safeguards contingency plans for transportation.

information collection requirement or request: 18.

10. Abstract:

The NRC CUI Program Challenge Request Process, also referred to as the Challenge Request Pro in this document, provides the process used for NRC Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) authorized holders to challenge the designation of information that has been marked as CUI as NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[NRC 2020 0057]

Standard Format and Content of Safeguards Contingency Plans for Transportation AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Regulatory guide; withdrawal.

This guide supports meeting NRC physical protection requirements for transportation of special nuclear material (SNM). In addition, it supports meeting the NRC licensing requirements to transport formula quantities of strategic SNM (also referred to as Category I quantities of strategic SNM).

The NRC is withdrawing RG 5.56, Safeguards Contingency Plans for improperly or incorrectly designated.

no