ML20113E188
| ML20113E188 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 09/30/1984 |
| From: | LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20113E175 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8501230344 | |
| Download: ML20113E188 (37) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:c i s . SNPS-1 FSAR i 17.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING THE OPERATIONS PHASE 17.2.1 Organization l The Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO) is responsible for the i j establishment and execution of the Quality Assurance (QA) Program 3 ( during the operational phase as required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix l'
) B. LILCO has established the organizational structure shown on !
Fig. 17.2.1-1 to fulfill this responsibility. The LILCO QA Program during design and construction, including the transition from the construction phase to the operational phase, is I described in Section 17.1. The Executive Vice President, who reports directly to the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, is ultimately responsible for LILCO Nuclear Operations and for the QA Program that has been established to support those operations. The Executive Vice President's Corporate Statement of Quality Assurance Policy commits LILC0 to strict adherence to the policies and requirements stipulated in the LILC0 Quality Assurance Manual and imposes the requirements on all personnel l and organizations who perform quality affecting functions. The l
/ Office of Nuclear Operations and the Office of Quality Assurance, i Safety and Compliance-have been formed to assist the Executive Vice President to fulfill his obligations. l h The Vice President, Nuclear Executive Vice President, has Operations, who reports to the overall responsibility for the engineering, modification, licensing, testing, startup, operation and maintenance of the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station. This responsibility includes ensuring that organizations and personnel under his jurisdictior, comply with the LILCO QA Program requirements in the performance of their duties. The Vice President, Nuclear Operations, has delegated the responsibilities ;
for the various functions to the Managers of the Nuclear Engineering and Nuclear Operations Support Departments, and the ' Plant Manager. The Director, Office of Quality Assurance Safety and Compliance, l reports directly to the Executive Vice President. He is responsible for directing the activities of the QA Department, the Nuclear Review Board (NRB), the Independent Safety , Group (ISEG), and the Reliability Group. The Engineering ensure that the nuclear Director's principal objective is to i power station and all support organizations establish andstandardsconform to adequate quality, safety and reliability policies, stop work when and procedures. He has the authority to circumstances so warrant. The Director has delegated specific QA functions to the QA Manager; he personally serves as chairman of the NRB; and he has appointed supervisors to direct the affairs of the ISEG and the Reliability Group. D foh& PDR 17.2-1 Revision 33 - September 1984 J
___ . _ - - - -.- ____- -.= - - -. - - - _ - - I SNPS-1 FSAR l l The Plant Manager of the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station reports to the Vice President. Nuclear Operations. The Plant Manager has ( ( l the direct responsibility for the safe and reliable operation of l the nuclear station. Tn assist him in this effort, he has formed
; within the plant staff five divisions as follows: Operations i Staff Division; Operations Division; Maintenance Division; Radiological Controls Division; and Outage and Modifications Division. .The Plant Manager is responsible for enforcino within the station those QA Program requirements that are applicable to ;
station functions and duties. He is required to maintain lines i uo f communication, coordination and cooperation with the QA Manager and to advise him of occurrences that might require j special attention by the QA Department. He has the authority to i stop work on any activity in the station including removal of the unit from service. The Manager. Quality Assurance Department (QA Manager), is responsible for the development and implementation of the overall QA Program during design . construction, preoperational testing, , operation, and modification of the nuclear power plant. A complete description of the program through preoperational testing, including organization and responsibility, is presented in Section 17.1.1A. j The minimum qualifications for the position of QA Manager during operations are the following. A Bachelor of Science or Engineering degree from an accredited university plus at least (mh' five years experience, requiring technical and administrative abilities in nuclear-related quality assurance, engineering, construction, or operations. At least two of the five years shall have been in quality assurance or in a responsible nuclear power plant position that required implementation of a quality assurance program. At least six months of the two years experience shall have been obtained within a QA organization. The QA Manager reports to the Director. Quality Assurance, Safety ' and Compliance. This organizational and functional relationship assures that LILC0 QA and QC personnel who audit or otherwise verify quality related activities are free from undue cost and
, scheduling influences and are independent of personnel who are responsible for or perform the activities being verified. i
! The Quality Assurance Manager is responsible for maintaining a working interface and communication with other LILCO organizations, regulatory agencies, consultants, contractors, i inspection firms, and others as required to effectively execute ! the policies stipulated in the QA Program. He is responsible for assuring the establishment and continuous implementation of the quality assurance indoctrination and training program for LILC0 i quality assurance and other concerned personnel. The , indoctrination and training will cover the quality related i policies, procedures, and requirements applicable to the L personnel involved. He is responsible for review and approval of i l 17.2-2 Revision 33 - September 1984 i (
~ ~ - . - . _,..n ,,n, ,-,,..,,,-__.n_ _ , - - . _ . - . - , _ _ - . , - - , - - . _ _ - . - - - - - - _ - - - - .
V l 2 ,. , SNPS-1 FSAR L. fr. - applicable documents to assure the inclusion of appropriate : s' (L' quality requirements as indicated in Section 17.2.6. He is ' responsible for the performance of audits as described in Section
! 17.2.18. In determining the applicability of the QA Program, the QA manager shall consider the safety significance accorded to f nonsafety related structures, systems, components, and plant computer software given to them in FSAR, Technical j Specifications, and Emergency Operating Procedures.
n j The QA Manager is responsible for defining the content and 1 changes to the LILC0 Quality Assurance Manual subject to review and approval as indicated in Table 17.2.6-1. L The QA Manager is authorized to evaluate.the manner in which all activities both at the station and offsite are conducted with i respect to quality by means of checks, reviews, audits, surveillance, and/or inspections. He shall perform this l evaluation on a planned and periodic basis to verify that the QA I Program is being effectively implemented. He is responsible for periodically evaluating and reporting on the status and adequacy l{ ( of the QA Program to the appropriate LILCO management. the authority and organizational freedom to identify quality He has f problems, to initiate, recommend or provide sol.utions through [ designated channels, and to verify implementation of solutions. He has the authority to initiate stop work action, or control [ further processing, delivery, or installation of nonconforming through appropriate channels as described in the [ '
-{W,O; material applicable QA Procedure.
1 p The QA Manager is assisted in carrying out his responsibilitics by the QA Department comprising three Quality Divisions. The Quality Control (QC). Division is located within the station and the Quality Systems (QS) and Quality Assurance (QA) Divisions are located outside of the station. The divisions are composed of engineers, and technical and nontechnical personnel as needed. Additionally, the staff of the QA Department shall be , supplemented when necessary by consultants, contractors or other i organizations within LILCO. Line' responsibility, cooro: nation N and communication during such exigency shall be through the Quality Division Managers. A The Quality Division Managers report directly to.the QA Manager. Minimum qualifications for the position of Quality Division Manager are as follows: Bachelors degree in engineering or li I science plus a minimum of 4 years experience in a responsible area of operations or quality assurance requiring both technical and administrative ability. Four years of acceptable experience } include at least 2 years of quality assurance experience or will 2 years of nuclear operations experience under the auspices of an o established quality assurance program plus formal quality [; assurance training. A high school diploma plus a minimum of 9 3 years experience in a responsible area of operations or quality
- l. 4 assurance activities, at least 5 years of which must be in the 17.2-3 Revision 33 - September 1984
SNPS-1 FSAR I I f area of quality assurance, will be considered equivalent . qualification for the position. These education and experience ( requirements may be modified by other factors such as previous i performance, satisfactory completion of proficiency testing, formal QA education, etc., when these other factors provide reasonable assurance that a person can competently perform required tasks. The Quality Division Managers are jointly responsible for assuring full implementation of the LILCO QA Program including
; additions and changes thereto. Each is responsible within his i delegated scope of duties to establish and implement appropriate l QA/QC procedures and instructions; review applicable documents as ; indicated in Section 17.2.6; and perform audits, surveillance and/or inspections as indicated in Sections 17.2.10 and 17.2.18.
Each has, within his scope of responsibilities, the authority and organizational freedom to identify and report quality problems;
/ initiate, recommend, or provide solutions through designated I channels; and verify implementation of solutions. He has the j authority to initiate stop work action through channels or i control further processing, delivery, or installation of l nonconforming material as described in the applicable QA
- procedures. ,
The QC Division Manager is physically located inside the operating plant for the purpose of assuring implementation of the ( LILCO QA Program at the station. He reports directly to the QA Manager and maintains a working interface and communication with (. the Plant Manager. He is responsible for evaluating and reporting the status and adequacy of the QA Program at the I station to the Plant Manager and the QA Manager on a periodic basis. The Nuclear Review Board, the Independent Safety Engineering Group, and the Review of Operations Committee are responsible for safety reviews, approval of programs, procedures, tests, repairs. L and modifications. Complete descriptions, including structures and responsibilities, are presented in Section 13.4.
- The Vice President Engineering and Administration, reports to the Executive Vice President. He has within his jurisdiction Services the Departments Computer and of Purchasing,
[ Environmental Engineering, Power Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Engineering Design and Mapping, and Engineering and Administration Systems Analysis. These organizations provide , ! support services as needed to the Office of Nuclear Operations. j Such services are subject to the policies and requirements of the
- QA Program.
I The Vice President, Fossil Production, who reports to the I ! Executive Vice President, includes among his responsibilities 1 jurisdiction over the General Services and Maintenance Services , Departments. The former department provides training of nuclear [. ! . Ai e 17.2-4 Revision 33 - September 1984 L i
r ( i . I SNPS-1 FSAR i
- r. . station personnel as requested, and the latter provides qualified (ff; personnel as needed to perform maintenance, repair and l modification activities. Under such conditions, these l organizations are subject to the policies and requirements of the QA Program.
The Vice President Gas Operations, reports to the Executive Vice h President. He has within his organization the Gas System Operation and Production Department which, when so requested, provides the nuclear station with calibration services for shop standards and measuring and test equipment. These services are subject to the policies and requirements of the QA Program. I The Vice President. Electrical Operations also reports to the h Executive Vice President. He has within his organization the q Electrical Systems Operations Department which provides f calibration and maintenance services for the nuclear station's i protective relays. These services are subject to the policies ' and requirements of the QA Program. 17.2.2 Quality Assurance Program L Responsibility for assuring that SNPS-1 will perform safely and reliably over the life of the station rests with LILCO. The ! ( LILCO Corporate Statement of Quality Assurance Policy imposes a QA Program which is designed to meet the requirements of Title 10
~ (d},!J G; of the Code of Federal Regulations. Part 50 Appendix B and identifies the QA Manual as the document which establishes the i requirements for quality-affecting activities during the l operational phase of nuclear power plants. The QA Manual, which is distributed on a controlled basis to responsible managers and l key supervisory and QA personnel, contains this corporate policy statement. .
The QA Program is designed to assure that activities such as , operation, maintenance, modification, repair, refueling, i inspection and testing..which affect safety related structures. - systems, and components, are accomplished in accordance with the l criteria of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B. The QA Program is applied to ! the safety related structures, systems and components listed in ! Table 3.2.1-1. Nonsafety related structures, systems components, ! and plant computer software shall be accorded, as a minimum, the l l safety significance given to them in the FSAR, the Technical ! Specifications, and Emergency Operating Procedures. This will i assure that the safety significance accorded to nonsafety related j structures, systems and components is maintained during the operation of Shoreham. The charters of the Review of Operations Committee, the Nuclear Review Board, and the Independent Safety i Engineering Group shall also reflect these considerations. Also, the Shoreham preventive and corrective maintenance program, the ' !' design change control program, procedures for procurement of
.f equipment, and procedures for modification and removal of l (g;., ?J equipment from service, shall ensure that LILC0 continue to apply i l
i 17.2-5 Revision 33 - September 1984
, 1
( . ij SNPS-1 FSAR 3 4 1: the safety significance accorded to nonsafety related structures, f-1 systems, and components given to them in the FSAR, Technical ( ] Specifications and Emergency Operating Procedures. Thus, the ' 4 responsible personnel implementing these programs and procedures, h shall, in exercising their judgment on the appropriate measures to be applied to nonsafety related structures, systems, and @Q components, do so in accordance with the corporate QA policy. The QA Program, described in the LILCO QA Manual, is supplemented d by QA Procedures and Instructions which provide the detailed f instructions and checklists necessary to implement, or verify 7 implementation of QA Program requirements. These procedures are delineated in Section 17.2.5. Quality Assurance Procedures and Instructions are issued, reviewed, and approved as shown in Table 9 17.2.6-1. The QA Manual, Procedures and Instructions shall be controlled in accordance with the requirements of Section 17.2.6. The transfer of LILCO QA responsibility from the design and construction phase to the operations phase is described in
! Section 17.1D. .
The QA Program requires that activities affecting quality shall be accomplished in accordance with documented policies, j procedures, and instructions throughout the life of the station. a These activities shall be accomplished under suitably controlled conditions. Controlled conditions include, as applicable, i appropriate equipment, suitable environmental conditions, and assurance that required prerequisites have been satisfied. Also 4-considered shall be the need for special controls, processes, test equipment, tools, qualification of personnel, and i < requirements for verification of examinations, or tests. quality by inspections, The QA Procedures for operations are derived from the program
; requirements established in the QA Manual. Organizations y performing activities which affect quality shall prepare their procedures incorporating requirements of the QA Manual and a referenced codes, standards, and guides. These procedures shall 1 also receive a quality assurance review to assure that all l program requirements have been addressed.
d The Corporate Statement of Quality Assurance Policy contained in the LILCO QA Manual imposes the mandatory QA Program requirements i on all personnel and organizations performing activities affecting the quality of safety related structures, systems, and
, components during the operational phase of station life. The i Director, QA, Safety and Compliance, is responsible for periodically engaging an organization independent of the 4{L organization being reviewed to assess LILCO quality related I activities and evaluate the scope, implementation, and effectiveness of the QA Program as applied to operations to assure that the program is adequate and complies with corporate QA policies, goals, objectives, and 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix 8 criteria. The requirement for independent QA Program evaluation (;
17.2-6 Revision 33 - September 1984
l' ' SNPS-1 FSAR is further imposed, as appropriate, on other organi s : ions C;. '; participating in the LILC0 QA Program. The LILC0 QA auditing system is described in Section 17.2.18. Direct responsibility for establishing and implementing the QA Program has been delegated to the QA Manager. Provisions have i been established for the referral of quality related problems to i the highest level of management necessary for resolution. The QA Manager is responsible for regularly assessing the status and adequacy of the QA Program, both internal and external to LILCO, and for reporting the results of this evaluation to the Director, QA, Safety and Compliance, and Vice President, Nuclear Operations who will advise Corporate Officers on the status and adequacy of
, the Program as required. This regular assessment shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements outlined in Section 17.2.18 and detailed in Section 18 of the QA Manual. The
! requirement for regular QA Program evaluation shall be extended to other participating organizations for the portions'of the j program they are executing. j The QA Program requires that procedures be established for the
- indoctrination and training of station and offsite personnel performing quality affecting activities. These procedures shall l document the scope, objective, and method of implementing the indoctrination and training program and contain provisions for documenting training sessions including content, date.
attendance, and results. The QA indoctrination and training j (T.$"? shall include instruction as to the purpose, scope, and i
- implementation of quality assurance manuals, procedures, and i instruction. Training and qualification in the principles and
. techniques of particular activities shall be provided to i
! personnel. Responsibility for accomplishment there of rests with the respective managers, as described below. The QA Manager is ! responsible for the quality assurance indoctrination of
- management, nuclear plant, and nuclear support personnel who perform functions affecting quality, and for the training of quality assurance personnel. This indoctrination and training shall include both original and refresher programs as well as maintenance of associated qualification records. In general, the LILCO engineering personnel will receive QA indoctrination as part of the LILCO QA Program described.
Respective managers shall be responsible for establishing and maintaining formal training programs and procedures for initial training, qualification, and retraining of their personnel to l assure that proficiency to perform their activities in quality related areas is achieved and maintained. The training programs shall be audited in accordance with the requirements stipulated l in Section 17.2.18. The QA Program meets the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B and 10CFR Part 55 and conforms to the guidance provided in NRC t% Regulatory-Guides which have been identified in Appendix 3B as ( %V) - pertaining to the operational phase of nuclear power plants. In l l t l 17.2-7 Revision 33 - September 1984 l
1 r .
? SNPS-1 FSAR j
i { addition, the QA Program shall conform to the guidelines and ( j requirements contained within the following ANSI Standards: (
? 1. ANSI N45.2.8-1975, Supplementary Quality Assurance l Requirements for Installation, Inspection, and Testing of Mechanical and Systems for the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants.
f
- 2. ANSI N45.2.12-1977 Requirements for Auditing of Quality Assurance Programs for Nuclear Power Plants f-
& 3. ANSI N45.2.13-1976, Quality Assurance Requirements for i Control of Procurement of Items and Services for Nuclear I : Power Plants I l j Outside agencies which perform functions such as design, manufacture, installation, inspection, or other technical P services on safety related structures, systems, or components
- shall be required to comply with those portions of 10 CFR 50,
- Appendix B and the LILC0 QA Program that are applicable to the
! services provided. LILC0 QA Procedures shall require that a review and evaluation report of a supplier's QA Program be ! available and accepted by LILCO QA prior to the issuance of a j purchase order for safety related material, components, or services to assure that this program meets those elements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, which apply to the materials, components, or j services to be rendered. ( ,i f Compliance with Quality Assurance Program requirements by both internal and external organizations shall be assured by a comprehensive system of audits and reviews performed by the QA Department under the direction of the Quality Assurance Manager, t Significant changes to the FSAR which may occur during the ' interim of the general review cycle shall be transmitted to l organizations as defined in the applicable administrative procedures. 17.2.3 Design Control The LILCO QA Program establishes measures to control design c activities which affect the quality of safety-related structures, systems, and components during the operational phase. These measures are applicable to all organizations performing design, design review, or design audit activities including changes or modifications thereto. Section 3 of the LILC0 QA Manual describes the QA Program requirements established to provide this control. The program requires that design activities be accomplished in a planned, controlled, orderly manner in accordance with I established procedures. Design control measures shall assure the I translation of applicable design bases, regulatory requirements, include the selection of suitable codes, and standards which 17.2-8 Revision 33 - September 1984
i i . SNPS-1 FSAR fp materials, parts, equipment, and processes into specifications, (h drawings, and documented procedures and instructions. The program requires that the quality requirements be included in the design documents. Deviation or changes to specified quality requirements in design documents shall be controlled. Suitable design control measures are required for design analysis such as reactor physics, stress, thermal, hydraulic, radiation, and accident analysis; compatibility of materials; accessibility for inservice inspection, maintenance and repair; and acceptance criteria for inspections and tests. Design control procedures shall identify I and control design interfaces both internal and external to LILCO. Design verification, such as design reviews, alternate calculations, or qualification testing, shall be properly I selected and accomplished. Responsibility for such verification is described later in this section. Where qualification testing of a prototype is used to verify adequacy of design, testing shall be performed _under the most adverse design conditions. The I program requires that design verification be performed by individuals or groups other than the original designer and th.e designer's immediate supervisor, but who may be from the same organization. Design changes shall be subject to design control l measures commensurate with those applied to the original design. Design control measures shall provide for the suitable review and I i .. selection of standard "off the shelf" commercial or previously
- approved material, parts, equipment and processes that are
! (23* essential to safety related structures, systems, and components. 4 Design documents and revisions thereto shall be distributed to l the responsible individuals in a timely and controlled manner to
- prevent inadvertent use of superseded documents. Control of l design documents is further described in Section 17.2.6. Design
- documents and reviews, records and changes thereto are collected.
stored, and maintained in accordance with Section 17.2.17. Errors or deficiencies which may arise during the design process shall be addressed in accordance with Sections 17.2.15 and l i 17.2.16. Organizations supplying equipment and/or services are responsible l for imposing the applicable requirements of this section on their internal operations and on those vendors and contractors performing work within the scope of their activity as required by the procurement documents. They are responsible for assuring by l means of audit or surveillance that design control as defined in their respective programs is being effectively implemented. , LILC0 is. responsible for assuring program adequacy and
- implementation for external suppliers through planned and periodic audits.
l The design change control programs also include provisions to ensure that nonsafety related structures, systems, components, t gra and plant computer software shall continue to be accorded the
, t! '; safety significance given to them in the FSAR, Technical 1
Specifications, and Emergency Operating Procedures. 17.2-9 Revision 33 - Septemuer 1984 I
t
; l' .
SNPS-1 FSAR In order to ensure a continuing level of engineering support, QA, j l and design control, an interim Management Control Program for Station Modification shall be implemented prior to fuel load and ((
- covering the period through approximately the first refueling.
I This program shall be implemented in accordance with approved administrative procedures. I j The qualified Architect / Engineer of record for the plant
! construction will be retained under this program to supply the necessary effort to maintain the safety and operability of the plant under existing, modified, or new, approved procedures.
I After this interim period, internal LILC0 organizations shall
? accomplish design activities such as preparation, review, approval, and issuance of appropriate design documents, including j changes thereto, as described in Table 17.2.6.1. Design changes, including those made by plant operating personnel, shall be governed by design control measures commensurate with those applied to the original design. Corrective action, as described I in Section 17.2.16, shall be applied to design process i deficiencies that adversely affect safety related structures, 3 systems, and components. .The Nuclear Engineering Department i Manager is responsible for determining, initially, whether i proposed modifications or repairs involve unreviewed safety ) questions or changes in technical specifications as described in j 10 CFR 50.59. This review shall be. forwarded to the Plant ..
Manager for approval and review by the Review of Operations I Committee. Procedures shall provide documentation and control of {i-such determinations. Technical evaluation, including design a verification, shall be the responsibility of the appropriate j organization such as. Nuclear Engineering, Nuclear Operations 4 Support, or a qualified independent organization. The LILCO j Quality Assurance Department is responsible for verifying overall I program establishment and implementation through' planned and j periocic audits. I L 17.2.4 Procurement Document Control The LILC0 QA Program provides for the control of procurement i documents for safety related material, equipment, and services
- whether purchased by LILCO or their designated agents during the L operational phase. Section 4 of the LILCO QA Manual describes the QA Program requirements established to assure procurement i document control.
L [ The program requires that procedures establish measures to assure 3 control of the preparation, review, approval, and concurrence for y procurement documents. Document control as described in Section c 1 17.2.6 and delineated in Table 17.2.6-1 shall be applied to 4 procurement documents including changes and revisions thereto. I The procurement documents shall be reviewed by qualified personnel, as defined within this section, assuring the adequacy z . I of the quality requirements. The review shall be utilized to il l l 17.2-10 Revision 33 - September 1984
[ s SNPS-1 FSAR l g. . assure that the quality requirements, including preparation,
?
(Y"
.- review, and approval, have been properly defined, that the , procured items are inspectable and controllable, and that the g acceptance criteria are adequately specified.
The program requires that procurement documents such as purchase specifications contain or reference the design bases technical requirements which include codes, industry standards, and regulatory requirements; material and component identification requirements; drawings and/or specifications, test and inspection
, requirements; and special process instructions. In addition, they are required to identify the requirements of 10 CFR 50 Appendix B with which the supplier QA Program must comply; the document requirements for drawings, speci.fications, procedures, personnel and procedure qualifications, material, chemical, and physical test results, and inspection and test records which must be prepared, maintained, submitted, or made available for review t and/or approval; the requirements for the retention, control, maintenance, and/or delivery of records; and the procuring agency's right of access to supplier's facilities and records for source inspection and audits. Procurement documents for spare or replacement parts shall be subject to program requirements which i o are equivalent to those used for the original equipment or those specified by a properly reviewed and approved revision.
The LILCO Purchasing Department is responsible for the commercial '
;O. aspects associated with procuring items or services which MU includes the processing of purchase orders. The internal LILCO organizations such as the Shoreham Plant Staff and the Nuclear Engineering, Nuclear Operations Support, and Quality Assurance i Departments are responsible for assuring that the procurement documents contain technical and quality requirements as indicated
, above. Authorized release, assuring acceptability of both technical and quality content, is required prior to releasing a purchase order. I The Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Staff and the various support organizations shall prepare those procurement documents pertaining to their scopes of responsibilities and present them to the Purchasing Department for processing. The QA Department is responsible for -reviewing the procurement documents for quality requirements, and for the review of and concurrence with selected suppliers' QA Programs. Agents such as consultants, architect-engineers, testing companies, etc., designated responsibility by LILCO for procurement activities associated with safety related material, equipment, or services shall impose the control requirements indicated above. They shall establish the requirements in i procedures, instructions, drawings, etc. These requirements shall be imposed on their internal operations and on any vendors
, or contractors performing work within the scope of their CG;, activities as required by the procurement documents. They shall 17.2-11 Revision 33 - September 1984
1 . l- SNPS-1 FSAR l assure the adequacy of program implementation through audit or ( 1 surveillance. LILCO shall verify program adequacy and ( implementation by suppliers through planned and periodic audits consistent with the complexity, importance, and quality of items or services. I Personnel exercising their judgment with regard to procurement of ! nonsafety related structures, systems, components, and plant l x 1 computer software shall assure that the safety significance
! accorded to them in the FSAR, Technical Specifications, and the i Emergency Operating Procedures is maintained throughout the p operating life of Shoreham.
I 17.2.5 Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings
- The LILCO QA Program establishes provisions for activities i
affecting the quality of safety-related structures, systems, and components during the operational phase to be accomplished and controlled in accordance with instruction, procedures, and drawings. Section 5 of the LILCO QA Manual describes the QA Program requirements for the control of instructions, procedures, and dr'awings. Organizational procedures delineate the sequence 3 of actions to be accomplished in the preparation, review, approval, and control of instructions, procedures, and drawings. Suppliers, vendors, and contractors have the responsibility for . establishing instructions, procedures, drawings, and other documents to control the quality related ac tivities of their own (f> operations and those of their subsuppliers as required by the procurement documents. A description of the associated procurement document control requirements is in Section 17.2.4. l LILCO nuclear operations and nuclear support organizations are responsible for establishing instructions, procedures, and drawings, or utilizing established procedures, instructions, etc., and other documents to control the quality-related activities they perform. The required station procedures are described in Section 13.5. All responsible organizations 4 establish provisions such that the development and implementation of instructions, procedures, and drawings, including changes I thereto, are clearly identified and controlled. l l The LILC0 QA Department is responsible for performing review, i surveillance and audit to verify that the instructions, procedures, drawings, and other documents used for safety-related structures, systems, and components are controlled to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50 Appendix B. Activities affecting the quality of safety-related structures, systems, and components are defined in- specifications, instructions, procedures, drawings, and other documents. They include qualitative and quantitative acceptance criteria for the (~ .
- activity being conducted. These criteria are used for (;
r
- 17.2-12 Revision 33 - September 1984 1
- - - - , , , - , e e,-,---,- rr-----,me -e-.--,,----,-n,- ,,,-n-,, - - , - e-v~,w--,-,--~n- *-n,m.w---.-w-
8 ,- . l SNPS-1 FSAR l 1 jr. ;S 4
.; controlling the quality-affecting activities. They . define y special process controls, codes, standards, and regul a to ry requirements.
, Table 17.2.5-1 contains a listing of the QA Department documents used to assure conformance to 10CFR50 Appendix B. The LILCO QA
!, Department reviews all safety-related test, calibration, special
! process, maintenance, modification and repair procedures, the inservice inspection program, drawings and specifications, and changes thereto, with respect to quality requirements as indicated in Section 17.2.6 and delineated in Table 17.2.6-1.
I
; 17.2.6 Document Control l The LILCO QA Program provides for the control of documents, y including changes thereto, which affect the quality of
} safety-related structures, systems, and components during the g operational phase. The applicable documents include, but are not i limited to, the QA Manual; QA Procedures and Instructions; Final
. Safety Analysis Report; design specifications; procurement i documents; design, manufacturing, construction, and installation
! drawings; and inspection and test procedures and instructions. i Section 6 of the LILCO QA Manual describes the QA Program : y requirements established to assure document control. . The program requires that a document control system be procedures
. (u,JL established in accordance with approved and 4 instructions for review, approval, and issuance of the documents,
- including changes thereto, to assure that they are adequate and
- incorporate the quality requirements prior to release. Document control procedures shall establish provisions for the identification of individuals or groups responsible for performing review, approval, issuance, or revision activities, The program requires that changes to documents be reviewed and approved by the organization responsible .for conducting the original review and approval or,~as deemed necessary by LILCO,
- such changes will be reviewed and approved by another qualified
( responsible organization. In the event that another qualified organization is charged with the responsibility for revision, it shall' have ~ access to pertinent background information and adequate' understanding of the requirements and intent of the i original document. Procedures and instructions provide measures
.to assure .the prompt distribution of approved changes and revisions including control of obsolete or superseded documents to prevent _their inadvertent use. The program requires that the documents be available at the location where the activity will be performed prior to the start or work. Change or revision level identification will be established and verified through-the utilization of document distribution lists. Updating and
- distribution to pers'onnelHof such lists will be consistent with the nature of the document.
i
- j. 17.2-13 Revision 33 - September 1984
1 r . ] SNPS-1 FSAR Suppliers of safety-related items and services are responsible for imposing the above document control requirements on their operations and on those vendors and contractors J internal
' performing work within the scope of their activities as required by the procurement documents. They shall assure program adequacy and implementation through planned and periodic audits. LILC0 is responsible for assuring program adequacy and implementation for
? external suppliers through planned and periodic audits. ] o LILC0 organizations who issue, review, and approve documents, including changes thereto, are responsible for establishing and i implementing a document control system in accordance with the I requirements indicated above. The LILC0 QA Department is f responsible for assuring overall program adequacy and j implementation through planned and periodic audits. Table a 17.2.6-1, Quality-related Document Control Responsibility, ) describes the established for preparation, review, j control approval, and distribution of LILCO generated documents. 1 17.2.7 Control of Purchased Material, Equipment, and Services ] LILCO QA Program establishes measures to assure that The
- safety-related material, equipment and services, procured during l the operational phase, either directly or through contractors, conform to the procurement document requirements. Section 7 of the LILCO QA Manual describes the QA Program requirements established to provide this control.
The program establishes provisions for source evaluation and selection. Source evaluation and selection may be based upon i historical quality performance data, source surveys or audits, or 4 source qualification programs. This will determine the supplier's capability to supply the item or service in compliance with the design, manufacturing and quality requirements as stipulated in th2 procurement documents. Measures are established to provide for both a techrical and quality evaluation of those suppliers providing safety-related components or services. LILCO organizatiors such as the Shoreham Plant Staff and the Nuclear Engineering, or Nuclear Operations Support Departments shall perform the technical evaluation and the QA I Department shall perform the quality evaluation. These functions
, may also be accomplished through the utilization of qualified independent organizations. Personnel performing the evaluations, such a auditors, will be qualified. Source evaluation and selection information will be documented and filed.
n f The program provides for source inspection, surveillance, and audit of suppliers to assure conformance to procurement document J requirements. They shall be conducted in accordance with j documented procedures. Source inspection procedures provide for a instructions to be established for specifying the characteristics to be witnessed, inspected or verified, and accepted; indicating e [y responsibility; and determining documentation requirements. { } 17.2-14 Revision 33 - September 1984 F h
i 4 j , SNPS-1 FSAR g Source audits or surveillance shall be conducted, a- necessary, l
-$- to assure compliance with quality requirements. Source r '
inspection or audit may not be necessary when the quality of the item can be verified by review of test reports, inspection upon receipt, or other means. The program requires that receiving inspection be accomplished in accordance with documented procedures and instructions. The receiving inspection procedures and instructions establish
.- measures to assure that the iten is properly identified and I corresponds to the receiving documentation, that the inspection ; of the item and acceptance records are determined to be r acceptable in accordance with the inspection instructions prior i to use, that the receiving documentation is '.vailable at the
) plant prior to use, and that the inspection status is identified i as indicated in Section 17.2.14. The QA Program specifies that i procurement documents require suppliers to furnish documentation identifying any procurement requirements which have not been met [ together with a, description of these nonconformances dispositioned " accept as is" or " repair" and that responsible QA I and technical personnel shall perform a review and approval of [ the supplier's recommended disposition. Nonconforming items'will [' be identified and controlled as indicated in Section 17.2.15. Inspections shall be conducted based upon the nature of the item I being procured. Where required by code, regulation, or other contract fV requirements, documentary evidence that items conform to procurement requirements shall be available at the plant and
. filed. This documentary evidence shall be retrievable and it shall specifically identify the item and codes and/or specifications met by the item. Where not precluded by other requirements, such documentation may take the form of written
[ certification of conformance identifying the requirements met by i the items. LILCO QA Procedures require that suppliers' I certificates of conformance be periodically evaluated by audits or tests to assure that they are valid. f Suppliers of safety-related material, equipment, and service are responsible for imposing the control requirements indicated abova i on their internal operations and on any vendors or contractors I; performing work within the scope of their activities as required f by the procurement documents. They shall assure through audit or t surveillance the adequacy of program implementation. 'The LILC0 l Purchasing Department is responsible for commercial aspects associated with procuring items or services. The LILCO i _ organizations who requisition items and/or services and the QA Department are responsible for assuring that the procurement documents contain the information as required above. Procedures have been established to control the spare and replacement part procurement documents, through technical and QA review, to ensure L L that the controls for safety-related items are equal to or better
. 4 than the_ original equipment. The QA Program requires that a 17.2-15 Revision 33 - September 1984 l .
, i ! SNPS-1 FSAR l~ l 1
technical evaluation and QA review be performed to determine the f-requirements to be applied to the procurement of spare and replacement parts when the original equipment requirements are Q. ' not known. Procurement document control is described in Section
, 17.2.4. LILC0 shall assure program adequacy and implementation of suppliers through planned and periodic audits consistent with j the complexity, importance, and quality of the item or service.
The LILC0 QA Department will be responsible for evaluating suppliers. This will include the utilization of qualified independent organization surveys. Source inspection, as i necessary, shall be conducted by LILCO or a qualified independent organization. The Shoreham Plant Staff is responsible for E I receipt of items at the station. The QA Department is responsible for conducting receiving inspection of items with respect to quality requirements, and assures overall program t establishment and implementation through planned and periodic h audits and surveillances, o and Materials, Parts, and
) 17.2.8 Identification Components Control of L
The LILC0 QA Program requires the establishment of an identification and control system to prevent the use of defective, unapproved or incorrect safety-related material, parts and components during the operational phase. Section 8 of the LILCO QA Manual describes the QA Program requirements established for this purpose. [ L The program requires that the identification system, including [ unique part or mark numbers, developed during the design and g construction phases, be maintained and expanded as necessary
- during the operational phase. A system for identification and 1 control of materials, parts, and components, including partially fabricated subassemblies shall be based on documented procedures I and/or instructions. Identification is referenced in specifications, drawings, purchase orders, or other appropriate documents providing traceability to associated documentation such as manufacturing and inspection documents, deviation reports, heat numbers, and mill test reports. The identification may be placed either on the item or on records directly and readily
! traceable to the item. Physical identification shall be used to the maximum extent possible and shall be applied in such a manner ss not to affect the function of the item. Verification of identification shall be accomplished at appropriate stages-throughout fabrication, assembly, shipping, and prior to installation.
1 Suppliers of safety-related material, parts and components, h during the operational phase, are responsible for establishing a system of identification and control which addresses the requirements as outlined above. -They are responsible for L imposing the requirements on their internal operations and on those vendors and contractors performing work within the scope of ( :s) nevision 33 - September 1984 f 17.2-1.
i . g' . l, SNPS-1 FSAR their activities as stipulated in the procurement documents. f _ ; They shall assure through audit or surveillance the adequacy of
- program implementation. LILC0 shall assure program adequacy and
{ implementation through planned and periodic audits of the 1 l i suppliers. ? l i ! Within the station, the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Staff is
- responsible for maintaining and expanding the identification and j control system for safety-related material, parts, and components which was established during the design and construction phase.
i In the event that a design change is necessary, during the , L operational phase, the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Staff is ' l responsible for supplying identification requirements to the i associated organizations assuring the continued implementation of i the established identification and control system. They are j responsible for phasing the supplier identification systems into j the plant system so as to maintain the required traceability. The QA Department is responsible for assuring overall program l l establishment and implementation through planned and periodic j audits, surveillance, and inspections at the station. !- 17.2.9 Control of Special Processes j l The LILCO QA Program imposes on organizations performing special processes the requirement to develop a system of special process processes include, but are not limited to,
. controls. Special processes such as unique production or fabricating processes, l . (1*d
'? inspection or test processes, welding, heat ' treating, i
nondestructive examination, and cleaning processes. Section 9 of the LILCO QA Manual describes the QA Program requirements established for control of special processes. [ The program requires that organizations performing special processes on safety-related equipment at the nuclear power plant or at an offsite facility do so to approved procedures, instructions, or the equivalent, and that equipment and personnel are qualified in accordance with applicable codes, standards, specifications, or special requirements. Special process ! procedures, in addition to providing for the qualification of equipment and p'ersonnel, shall provide for the documentation of i accomplished activities. Where special processes are not covered i by existing codes or standards, or w1ere item quality requirements exceed the requirements of esttblished codes or i' standards, the necessary qualification of personnel, equipment, or procedures shall be required. Special process procedures and qualification records shall be filed, maintained, and available
- for verification.
l Suppliers of equipment and services whose scope of activity
- includes utilization and control of special processes are 4
responsible for imposing these requirements on their internal s operations and on those suppliers, vendors, or contractors i-WI performing work within the scope of their activity as required by l 17.2-17 Revision 33 - September 1984
- .--~.._ ., -.._._._ _ _._ --._ - _._ - __ _ , . . _ . _ _ . - , _ _ . -
. 4 SNPS-1 FSAR the procurement documents. Special process controls shall be f-submitted to the suppliers for approval as specified in the (
procurement documents. They shall verify through audit or surveillance the adequacy of program implementation. LILC0 shall verify overall program adequacy and implementation of I internal organizations and suppliers through planned and periodic audits. 17.2.10 Inspection The LILC0 QA Program provides for inspection of activities which affect the quality of safety-related structures, systems and components during the operational phase. Section 10 of the LILC0 QA Manual describes the QA Program requirements established for inspection. It provides for an inspection program to be implemented in accordance with applicable procedures, instructions and checklists. The program requires that inspections be performed by individuals other than those who performed or directly < supervised the activity being inspected. Inspection procedures, instructions, or checklists contain identification of responsibility for performance of the inspection, method of inspection, characteristics to be inspected, acceptance / rejection criteria, verification, evaluation and documentation of the results of the inspection. procedures or instructions be made available for use, with The program requires that inspection ([i i supporting documents such as drawings and specifications, prior i to the performance of inspection operations. Information I concerning inspections shall be obtained from design
; specifications, drawings and/or other controlled documents which include codes, standards, and regulatory requirements. The l inspections are conducted by inspectors who have been qualified j- and certified in accordance with codes, standards, and/or LILC0 training programs. The inspection program requires that be kept current. The respective inspector qualifications i managers shall be responsible for certifying their inspection personnel.
When notification or hold points are established in procurement or other documents, the inspection program requires that: I L 1. Work does not progress beyond the hold point until released by the designated authority.
- 2. The notification and acknowledgement has been satisfied prior to continuation of work.
Inspection of rework, repair, replacement, or modification I activities shall be conducted in accordance with the original
, design criteria and inspection requirements, or by means of an
- l. approved alternate. Such alternates shall be evaluated on both a 17.2-18 Revision 33 - September 1984
1 N f
- j SNPS-1 FSAR 2
technical and quality basis. When direct inspection is not (
~
possible, provisions are established for indirect control by 3 monitoring of processing methods, equipment, and personnel. J Suppliers of safety-related material are responsible for imposing ; h] a the above requirements on their internal operations and on vendors those or contractors performing work within the scope of their i internal operations and on those vendors or contractors i performing work within the scope of their activities as required j by the procurement documents. They shall assure through audit or
- s surveillance the adequacy of program implementation. LILCO, j through planned and periodic audits, surveillance and a participation in selected inspections, shall verify conformance 1 of inspection programs delegated to external organizations. When
- inspections or other safety-related activities are conducted by
; the plant staff or an outside contractor at the station, the QA g Department is responsible for verifying that the inspection 4 program complies with the requirements as outlined above. The j LILCO QA organization is responsible for reviewing maintenance 1 and modification procedures to assure that requirements such as 1 the need for inspection, identification of personnel, and ] documentation of results have been addressed.
1 a 17.2.11 Test Control d
] The LILCO QA Program establishes provisions to assure that ] fi. testing required to demonstrate that safety-related structures, i V systems, and components will perform satisfactorily in service is conducted in accordance with an approved documented test program.
14 Section 11 of the LILCO QA Manual describes the QA Program requirements established for test control during the operational j phase, q l It is required that the test program be identified, documented, i and accomplished in accordance with procedures that are written,
? approved, and controlled. The basis for determining when proof, preoperational and operational tests are required to, demonstrate / that an item will perform satisfactorily in service are addressed l in Chapter 14 and in the LILCO QA and Startup Manuals. The QA d Program has established that modifications, repairs, and
/J replacements shall be tested in accordance with the original l t design and testing requirements or acceptable alternatives. Technical and QA reviews provide assurance that the testing does il accomplish this end. The test procedures contain or reference j the requirements and acceptance limits from the applicable design y or procurement documents. They establish provisions to assure that prerequisites for a given test have been met. Prerequisites h;, include: test equipment is adequate and in satisfactory
; operating condition; test instrumentation has been properly
( calibrated; personnel are trained, qualified, and certified if j) necessary for the various test functions; preparation, condition,
~ and completeness of the item to be used has been satisfactorily
([ accomplished; suitable environmental conditions are available; 1 3 17.2-19 Revision 33 - Se'ptember 1984 .I i
i
~
SNPS-1 FSAR i provisions for data acquisition have been established; if j necessary, .nandatory inspection hold points for witness by the J designated authority are included; appropriate h". 1 acceptance / rejection criteria are established; and methods for i documenting data and results are established. The program requires that test results be documented in sufficient detail to
) prevent misinterpretation, that they be evaluated g to the 4
established criteria, and that the acceptance status be identified by a qualified, responsible individual or group. Test I records shall be appropriately filed upon completion of the test q and evaluation.
- Suppliers of safety related material and services are responsible j for imposing the above requirements on their internal operations
'o and on those vendors and contractors performing work within the scope of their activities as stipulated in the procurement documents. They shall assure through audit or surveillance the adequacy of program implementation. LILCO shall verify program adequacy and implementation of external suppliers through plannad and periodic audits.
Responsibility for the station testing programs has been assigned to the LILCD startup organization during the checkout and initial operation and the preoperational phase, and to the plant staff i during the operational phase. The LILCO QA Department is responsible for verifying overall program establishment and
, implementation through planned and periodic audits and $
surveillance. D l I l i s L e e I l 17.2-20 Revision 33 - September 1984
l.' t SNPS-1 FSAR L 17.2.12 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment [ The LILCO QA Program imposes requirements for control of y measuring and test equipment on organizations whose activities affect the quality of safety related structures, systems, and components. The program requires calibration control for the measuring and test instruments, tools, gauges, fixtures, reference and transfer standards, and nondestructive test equipment. Section 12 of the LILCO QA Manual defines the QA Program requirements established for control of measuring and test equipment. 4 The program requires that calibration procedures describe the technique, frequency, and maintenance for measuring and test equipment. The QA Program requires procedures to establish methods for identification of measuring and test equipment and associated calibration data including provisions to assure that equipment is labeled, tagged, or uniquely numbered to a n ' documented control system to indicate the date of the next calibration. The frequency of calibration is established for measuring and test equipment on an individual basis or generic J grouping thereof. It is based upon the type of equipment. required accuracy, stability characteristics, purpose, degree of C usage, experience, manufacturers' recommendations, and recognized
- industry standards. The reference and transfer standards are traceable to nationally recognized standards and, for any exceptions, provisions are established to document the basis for
}
(CA calibration. The calibration program requires that in the event an instrument is found to be out of calibration, an investigation j; shall be conducted and documented to determine the validity of i a previous measurements. It is required that calibration records be established and maintained to provide objective evidence that measuring and test equipment is being controlled, calibrated, and j maintained in accordance with approved procedures. Provisions assure that calibrating standards have an accuracy, range and stability, which are adequate to verify that the equipment being calibrated is within specified tolerance and can jr meet all other specified requirements. The reference standard which acts as the working (shop) standard f: shall have a tolerance not greater than one-fourth the specified 1' tolerance of the M&TE being calibrated except when equipment acceptable for nuclear power plant applications is not commercially available. In those cases, instruments of equal or greater accuracy shall be used. The reference standards which are used to calibrate the working (shop) standards shall have an accuracy greater than that of the working (shop) standard. When
> reference standards which are used to calibrate the working (shop) standard have an accuracy equal to that of the working (shop) standard, the basis for the use of standards having the
- v. same accuracy shall be documented and shall be approved by T. responsible management.
17.2-21 Revision 33 - September-1984 l 1
- . _ ~ ._ _ . . _ . . - . _ . - - _ _ . ._ - - _ _ ~ _ - -. -
2 ij
] SNPS-1 FSAR i;
Procedures shall be written to control and monitor the use of M M&TE and Reference Standards in order to assure that the above (! l requirements are maintained within the limitations noted. These procedures also assure that permanently installed operating instrumentation is calibrated against M&TE having a tolerance not greater than the specified tolerance of the installed W instrumentation. q . q Suppliers of equipment and services whose scope of activity l 3 includes the utilization of measuring and test equipment on ' J safety related structures, systems, and components during the
- operational phase are responsible for imposing the above control '
N requirements on their internal operations and on those vendors and contractors performing work within the scope of their N ~) activities as required by the procurement documents. They shall h assure through audit and surveillance the adequacy of program implementation. LILCO shall verify program adequacy and ,; implementation through planned and periodic audits of suppliers. H The operating plant staff is responsible for imposing the above l requirements for control of measuring and test equipment utilized h in the station. In general, this responsibility is retained by the Instrumentation and Contrcl Section. The LILCO QA Department o o is responsible for verifying progran establishment and implementation through planned and periodic audits and
;] surveillance.
17.2.13 Handling. Storage, and Shipping The LILCO QA Program imposes control requirements on n , organizations whose scope of activity includes the handling, i storage, and shipment of safety-related structures, systems and components during the operational phase. Section 13 of the LILCO QA Manual describes tie QA Program requirements established for handling, storage, and shipment. H The program requires that organizations performing handling. storage, and shipping activities including cleaning, packaging, L and preservation do so to written procedures or instructions. ,. These procedures shall be developed in accordance with applicable design and specification requirements and provide for control of the aforementioned activities to preclude damage, loss, or deterioration of safety-related material, components, and conditions such as special equipment. Special environmental coverings, inert gas atmosphere, allowable moisture content, and level shall be detailed and their existence verifted i temperature o and documented. Provisions for necessary cleaning operations as 1: required by' the nature of the material or equipment shall be I included and their verification documented. Special handling requirements shall be provided and controlled to ensure safe and adequate handling, including associated verification and documentation. The procedures or instructions provide for U inspection operations to verify conformance to establish use personnel, and associated criteria, of qualified (! 17.2-22 Revision 33 - September 1984 f
i.q *
. e j SNPS-1 FSAR .j a
- l ((p- documentation. In addition, they shall provide for the
<j .s controlled release of safety-related material, components, or U equipment from storage for shipment or installation and for the 4 verification and documentation thereof.
3 The program requirements are applicable to the stages of fabrication, manufacturing, and installation associated with the op2 rational phase. Suppliers are responsible for imposing the ! requirements, as specified in the procurement documents, on their '
. internal operations and on those vendors and contractors , performing work within the scope of theit activities. They also assure through audit or surveillance the adequacy of program implementation. At the station, the operating plant staff is responsible for imposing the indicated requirements for the ; associated activities.
The LILCO QA Department shall verify overall program adequacy, and implementation by internal organizations and by suppliers, i through planned and periodic audits. 17.2.14 Inspection, Test, and Operating Status a The LILC0 QA Program provides measures for indicating the inspection, test, and operating status of safety-related . structures, systems, and components. Section 14 of the LILCO QA h-(fe; Manual describes the QA Program requirements for identification and control of inspection, test, and operating status. i The Program requires that the organizations responsible for fabrication, storage, installation, test, and operation of safety-related components and systems identify and control the g inspection, test, and operating status of these items. The l status is identified and controlled through the utilization of H status indicators such as, tags, markings, logs, shop travelers, o stamps, inspection, or test records. Ia addition, the Program requires the establishment of measures to control the use of the a status indicators including responsibility and authority for i their application and removal and the unique identification of o the individual involved. Associated procedures establish provisions to assure the performance of required tests and inspections including requirements that the identification of the D status be known at any given time. The bypassing of required inspections, tests, and other critical operations is controlled through station administrative procedures. These administrative
- procedures shall be reviewed by the QA Department. Procedures i establish measures to indicate the operating status to prevent inadvertent operation of safety-related systems, equipment, and components. They establish provisions so that the identification 1 of operating status be known at any given time.
The programs assure that functions performed out of sequence are ( r.i? adequately documented and do not compromise system integrity. 17.2-23 Revision 33 - September 1984
4 SNPS-1 FSAR a
'l Procedures provide for the positive identification and control of f
p e nonconforming items in accordance with Section 17.2.15, to prevent their inadvertent use. (' ' The program requirements are applicable to stages of fabrication, installation, test, and operation associated with the operational phase. Suppliers are responsible for imposing the requirements,
! as specified in the procurement documents, on their internal operations and on those vendors and contractors performing work
{ within the scope of their activities. They also assure through t audit or surveillance the adequacy of program implementation. [ The operating plant staff is responsible for imposing the i indicated requirements within the station. I The LILCO QA Department shall verify overall program adequacy, I . and implementation by internal organizations as well as by [ suppliers, through planned and periodic audits. 17.2.15 Nonconforming Materials, Parts, or Components ! ! The LILCO QA Program imposes requirements for control of ) . nonconforming safety-related caterial, parts, and components. e These requirements are applicable to organizations whose ! activities affect the quality of such safety related items during , the operational phase. Section 15 of the LILCO QA Manual describes the QA Program requirements established to assure control of nonconforming items to prevent their inadvertent use f. a or installation. L i i The program requires that a control system be established to I address nonconformances in accordance with documented, approved t procedures. The procedures establish measures to assure that
- nonconforming items and services are properly identified, t documented, reviewed, segregated if practical, dispositioned, and l
reported to affected organizations. In addition, they establish i provisions for designation of responsibility and authority for i approval of the dispositioning of nonconforming items. The program requires that nonconforming items be documented and that I such documentation include a clear identification of the ! nonconformance, a description of the nonconformance, the ( appropriate disposition including the approval signature, and the 1 I applicable inspection requirements. Nonconforming items shall be L clearly identified as such and placed in a controlled segregated [ area, when practical, until proper disposition has been effected. [ Nonconforming items may be dispositioned by accepting "as is," ! scrapping, repairing, or reworking. The acceptability of r repaired or reworked nonconforming items is verified by [ e reinspection. The reinspection of the item will be in accordance with the original inspection requirements or by a method which is equivalent to the original inspection method. The program requires that the appropriate repair, rework, and inspection , procedures be documented. Nonconformance reports verifying !' ) i I 17.2-24 Revision 33 - September 1984
)
) e ..
SNPS-1 FSAR ry " accept as is" or " repair" disposition shall be made part of the i Uf required inspection records. l i Suppliers of safety-related materials, parts, and components are l c responsible for imposing the above requirements on their internal ; operations and on those vendors and contractors performing work [ within the scope of their activities as required by the procerement documents. They also assure, through audit or surveillance, program adequacy and implementation. LILCO is responsible for conducting audits to verify program adequacy and implementation by suppliers. The LILCO QA Department { responsible for assessing the adequacy and implementation of is 7 supplier's nonconformance control systems. This is in addition i to technical reviews of applicable nonconformance reports by o other LILCO organizations such as Shoreham Operations, Nuclear Engineering and Nuclear Operations Support Departments. I Safety-related nonconformance reports shall be analyzed 1-periodically to determine the existence of quality trends. Trends, if any, shall be reported to the appropriate LILCO [ management. i When a LILCO organization discovers a nonconformance related to a i LILCO activity, it is that organization's responsibility to generate and control a nonconformance report in accordance with the requirements stated herein. In general, the organization responsible for the nonconforming condition is responsible to {L'p5 provide an acceptable disposition. The reporting organization
. and the QA Department are required to review and accept the disposition before it may be implemented.
17.2.16 Corrective Action The LILCO QA Program provides measures to assure that conditions adverst to quality are promptly identified, reported and corrected. Section 16 of the LILCO QA Manual describes the QA Program requirements for corrective action and control thereof. The program provides for a corrective action system implemented through the use of approved written procedures. The procedures provide for an evaluation of deficiencies, including nonconformance .aports, and determination of the need for corrective action. They provide for the reporting, to LILC0 station and offsite management, the cause of the conditions significant to quality and the corrective action taken. The program requires that upon determination of significant conditions adverse to quality prompt corrective action be initiated to preclude repetition. In addition, verification is required to assure that these actions have been implemented. Follow-up action is conducted to verify that specified corrective action has been properly implemented and corrective action documentation has been closed out.' g 17.2-25 Revision 33 - September 1984
1 I
' . ' ' 1 Y SNPS-1 FSAR l I
l l I' Suppliers are responsible for establishing and implementing a , i corrective action system. The supplier systems provide measures l which comply with the requirements outlined above and are imposed ' I on internal operations as well as on vendors and contractors performing work within the scope of their activities as required
.! by the procurement documents. They also assure through audit or surveillance the adequacy of implementation. LILC0 shall verify
. overall program adequacy and implementation through planned and periodic audits. [ I I The LILCO QA Department shall be informed of corrective action { determinations associated with safety-related structures, , systems, and components. In addition, they are responsible for
- verifying proper implementation of internal corrective action associated with safety-related structures, systems, and i components.
17.2-26 Revision 33 - September 1984
. t e- ,. .
J SNPS-1 FSAR 17.2.17 Quality Assurance Records {
- The LILCO QA Program imposes requirements on organizations I performing safety-related functions for quality assurance records l which furnish documentary evidence of the quality of items and of a
activities affecting quality during the operational phase. Section 17 of the LILCO QA Manual describes the QA Program I requirements established for quality assurance records. The program requires that records documenting evidence of the quality of items and activities include results of reviews, inspections, tests, audits, and material analyses; monitoring of work performance; qualification of personnel, procedures, and equipment; operating logs; maintenance and modification activities; abnormal occurrences; and other documentation such as l drawings, specifications, procurement documents, calibration procedures and reports, nonconformance reports, and corrective action reports. Requirements for identification, transmittal, retention, and maintenance of quality related records subsequent to completion of work or prior to release of material or equipment for installation are to be indicated in procurement documents, specifications, procedures, or instructions, and are to be consistent with applicable codes and standards. The program requires that inspection and test records specify a description of the type of observation. identification of the ' l 3 inspector or data recorder, evidence of completion or h'0j'; verification of manufacturing, inspection or test operation, the date and results of the inspection or test, information related to nonconformances, and acceptability of the item inspected or tested. The permanent plant filing system, developed during the design and construction phases and maintained during the operational phase is known as the Shoreham Records Retrieval System and is under the direction of the Nuclear Operations Support Department. It assures that quality assurance records are readily identifiable and retrievable. The program requires that the record storage facilities within the plant be constructed. l located, and secured to prevent damage or loss of records due to conditions such as fire, flooding, theft, or environmental temperature or humidity or, alternatively, to maintain duplicate records stored in a separate remote location. Suppliers performing safety-related activities are responsible for imposing the generation, collection, storage and maintenance requirements of quality assurance records on their internal
; operations and on those vendors and contractors performing work ) within the scope of their activities as specified in the
- procurement documents. They also assure through audit or surveillance the adequacy of program implementation. At the station, the Plant Staff is responsible for imposing their own
, (il records requirements as indicated above. The QA Department shall (m? verify overall program adequacy and implementation of LILCO 17.2-27 Revision 33 - September 1984
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . __-____ ___ A
, . i ; e, ,.
SNPS-1 FSAR l I i internal organizations and suppliers through planned and periodic , i audits. .;
]
17.2.18 Audits
.I The LILCO QA Program establishes provisions for a comprehensive system of planned and periodic audits to verify implementation of f program requirements. Section 18 of the QA Manual describes the QA Program requirements for audits. ; The program requires that a comprehensive system of audits be j established for both internal and external functions which affect safety-related structures, systems, and components to verify compliance with QA Program requirements as well as with approved quality assurance procedures, the station technical specifications, administrative controls and regulatory
.'! I requirements. Audits shall include evaluations of quality
, related practices, effectiveness of implementation, conformance
- to policy, work areas, activities and processes, and reviews of f s documents and records.
Audits shall be conducted to predetermined schedules. These
-, schedules shall be reviewed, published annutlly, and updated as i required. Audit frequency shall be based on the status, safety, and importance of the audited activity and results of prior i audits. Audits shall be scheduled to ensure ttiat implementation .
of QA Program requirements and related supporting procedures W receive a comprehensive audit at least every 2 years. Those ~4 applicable elements of the QA Program in which quality-related activities are more intensive and impacting upon daily operation , shall be audited at least annually. Audits of nonroutine , operations such as major modifications shall be scheduled as necessary. Audits shall be conducted in accordance with written, ap roved procedures, plans and checklists by qualified personne not directly responsible for the area being audited. Audits shall provide for objective evaluation of the status and adequacy of the area audited. Audit results shall be documented. Deficient areas shall be h reported to management having responsibility for the area being 3 audited to assure corrective action. The QA Manager and the j Plant Manager shall review and assess the results of audits i performed .within the station and assure implementation of i required corrective action. Re-audits of deficient areas shall 7 be performed, as required, to assure effective implementation of I corrective and preventive action. 1 The QA Department is responsible for audit plannin , preparation, scheduling, performance, reporting and, as requ red, verifying
. implementation of corrective and preventive action measures.
I 17.2-28 Revision 33 - September 1984
i SNPS-1 FSAR The QA Manager is res onsible for assuring the development and h implementation of t e overall audit program. The QA Department ,
.I is responsible for auditing the activities of the Shoreham Nuclear Plant Staff. LILC0 nuclear support organizations, and suppliers of safety-related materials and services. Audit planning, scheduling, and programs developed by QA personnel shall be approved by the QA Manager. . LILCO and major suppliers also perform audits and/or surveys of their suppliers to evaluate QA Programs, procedures, and L
activities. l LILCO and major suppliers also perform surveillance and audits of their suppliers after source evaluation and award of contract. t The degree of surveillance and audit of suppliers after source ' evaluation and award of contract shall be determined by the l importance of the product to safety, the compicxity of the
, product, the likelihood of the product to fail, the quality j history of the supplier, and the feasibility of verification of , quality requirements upon receipt of the product. ,
i The QA Manager shall review audit results and assure i l implementation of required corrective action. These audit t results shall also be used as source information for determining I quality trends and QA Program status and adequacy which shall be reported to appropriate management levels on a periodic basis. - Suppliers of safety-related materials and services are p responsible for imposing the requirements of this Section on their internal operations and on vendors or contractors I preferming work within the scope of their activity as required by the procurement documents. Responsibility and authority for establishing and implementing QA , Program requirements relating to audits may be delegated, as deemed necessary by LILC0 to other organizations. LILCO. in i delegating such responsibility shall retain ultimate responsibility for assuring compliance with QA Program a requirements. i I f 17.2-2g Revision 33 - September 1984
. l
**' i j
SNPS-1 FS/R I k TABLE 17.2.5-1 LILCO QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL [ AND IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES Applicable Document 10CFR50/8 Type / Subject Purpose Criteria LILCO Quality To set forth the policy and QA All
, Assurance requirements established by the l Manual Long Island Lighting Company to I assure that nuclear power stations I
are designed, constructed, tested, and operated in accordance with 10CFR50 Appendix B. Quality Assur- To provide methods for the QA Depart- All ance Procedures ment to implement the requirements set ! forth in the QA Manual. The following ( list describes only subjects and l purposes of QA Procedures. It does ! not identify them by specific titles or numbers. Organization To describe the organization of the
- I
#D. LILCO QA Department and assign'respon-h d
- sibilities.
Stop Work To describe the stop work authority I Authority of QA Department personnel. Quality To describe the QA indoctrination and II Assurance training of personnel employed in Indoctrination nuclear operations and support functions. and Training Training and To establish the requirements for II Qualification training and qualification of LILC0 of QA Audit QA Department Audit personnel. Personnel Qualification To establish the methods to train. II and Certifi- qualify and certify NDE personnel. cation of NDE personnel G 1 of 5 Revision 33 - September 1984
C C ' a SNPS-1 FSAR 1 J s 1, TABLE 17.2.5-1 (CONT'D) Applicable Document 10CFR50/B Type / Subject Purpose Criteria Qualification To establish the methods to train, II
} and Certifi- qualify and certify LILCO test, j cation of Test, inspection, and examination personnel.
Inspection and jl Examination Personnel
)
I Quality Trends To establish a method for identifying II quality-related trends which may have i significant adverse effects on the
;I LILCO QA Program.
l Reports to To establish the system for reporting II l Management significant developments to concerned j management personnel. l QA Program To establish the system for QA II j Status and management to evaluate the status j Adequacy and adequacy of the QA Program. I
$1 W
Management Assessment of To provide direction'for the conduct of annual independent assessment of 11 l; the QA Program the QA Program.
- QA Review To describe the methods, and to III
; of Design provide the criteria, for the QA l Documents Department review of design documents i
such as specifications, design input /
- output documents and packages, design
) change reports, and modification and l repair documents. 4 QA Review of To provide instructions for the QA IV g Procurement Department review of procurement J Documents documents. I Procurement by To provide the instructions for the IV t Quality Assur- procurement of services and equipment [ ance by the QA Department. r ! QA Procedures. To provide instructions for the prepar- V ! Instructions, ation issuance, revision, periodic i Memoranda, and review, and updating of LILC0 QA l Change Motices Department Procedures. Instructions, t Memoranda, and Change Notices. h) 2 of 5 Revision 33 - September 1984
l
#**'~
SNPS-1 FSAR l TABLE 17.2.5-1 (CONT'D) l t L (*S Applicable l i ! Document 10CFR50/B ! Type / Subject Purpose Criteria . Quality To provide instructions for the prepar- V f Assurance ation issuance, revision, periodic d I Manual review, and updating of the LILCO ; ! Quality Assurance Manual. i QA Review of To provide instructions for the QA V l Other Depart- review of procedures prepared by other , ment Procedures LILCO Departments. l l Control of QA To provide the method for control of VI ^ Department documents prepared by the QA Department. Documents Control of QA To provide instructions for the control VI, i Forms. Check- of generic forms, checklists and
; lists and surveillance plans.
[ Surveillance 3 Plans Supplier Selec- To provide the methods to evaluate the VII I Cyp tion and Evalu- capabilities of proposed suppliers. ! u ation i ! I i Procurement To establish instructions to review pro- VII s Surveys by- spective suppliers' QA Manuals and to LILC0 perform procurement surveys of the i implementation of their quality systems. To provide the instructions for the VII ; QA Surve11-
- 1ance of surveillance of suppliers to assure that '
l Supplier the items being procured conform with j Activities specified requirements. s , Qualified To provide the method for developing VII l Suppliers List and maintaining the Qualified Suppliers A and Scheduling List and scheduling visits to Supplier's Visits to facilities for audits, inspections and I Suppliers surveillance. [ Identification To define QA Department responsi- VIII and Control of bilities toward the identification Material and and control of materials, parts Equipment and components. Review of To provide the instructions for the IX
% Special Process QA Department review of special
? Procedures process procedures.
3 of 5 Revision 33 - September 1984
. 1 SNPS-1 FSAR l
TABLE 17.2.5-1 (CONT'D) I h,*' p Applicable Document 10CFR50/B Type / Subject Purpose Criteria I ISI To provide the instructions for IX Surveillance LILC0 personnel to monitor the ISI I operation to assure conformance to l specified requirements. f Review of ISI To provide for QA Department review IX l Program Plan of ISI Plan and of the examination l and Examination records. Results t Surveillance or To provide for QA Department surveil- IX [' Monitoring of lance or monitoring of special processes
, Special conducted in the station or supplier's l Processes facilities.
QA Control of To establish the controls for inspection X Inspections in of station structures, systems and com-the Station ponents. l Receiving To define requirements and responsi- X
,n Inspection bilities for station receiving CNF inspection. , Inspection of To provide for the QA inspection of X Station Instal- installations and repairs within the lations and station.
Repairs Surveillance To establish the rules for planning. X of Station scheduling, conducting and documenting Activities surveillance of station activities. Test Control To provide methods whereby the QA XI i Department shall verify that control I of testing is adequate. e l Testing of To provide instructions for performing XI Materials tests such as mechanical testing and
, soils and concrete testing.
Control of To provide methods by which the QA XII Station MATE Department verify adequate control of
, . measuring and test equipment. ; Control of To provide the methods used to control XII ns QA MATE and calibrate MATE used by the QA
(>? Department. L ' l 4 of 5 Revision 33 - September 1984
." ]
l"*"* SNPS-1 FSAR l l l t TABLE 17.2.5-1 (CONT'D) (. Applicable Document 10CFR50/B Type / Subject Purpose Criteria Control of To describe the QA methods for verifying XIII Handling, the control of the handling, storage and Storage and shipping of station items. 1 Shipping
; Control of To describe the QA criteria developed XIV N Inspection to verify that inspection, test, and Test and operating status has been controlled.
Operating 1 Status ,[ Nonconfor- To assign responsibilities and establish XV 4 mance Reports procedures for the QA Department review l of nonconformance reports.
- Reportable To assign the responsibilities and esta- XV Deficiencies blish detailed procedures for the Under 10CFR reporting, by LILCO QA Department j 50.55(e) or personnel, of significant d.eficiencies j 10 CFR 21 or defects and failure to comply.
f,. d C Control of To provide the method whereby the QA XV . i Conditional Department controls the conditional Releases release of nonconforming items. '.i Corrective To provide detailed procedures for QA XVI j Action Department personnel to report defi-1 ciencies and nonconformances, and to W document satisfactory corrective actions. i Quality Assurance To assign responsibilities and provide instructions for the retention of XVII Records quality assurance records. QA Audit and To establish comprehensive audit and XVIII i Surveillance surveillance systems for verifying l compliance with the elements of the LILC0 QA Program, s NOTES: S
)
- 1. Each procedure will be uniquely numbered.
- 2. Procedures may be added to, revised, or deleted from this table without changing its intent. Therefore, this table should only be considered as representative.
5 of 5 Revision 33 - September 1984
- ._ ~ _..t. - u.: , - - _- - .-
~ _ ~ _ , . , _ _ . . . .- - _ _ _ _ , ,
s j 1 SNPS-1 FSAR TABLE 17.2.6-1 QUALITY RELATED DOCQGNT CONTROL RESPONSIBILITT Doctament (1) Prepared (2) Beviewed (3) Approved (3) Issued (3) QA Manual QA Department Vice President, Nuclear Director - QA, Safety QA Manager Operations: Appropriate LILCO & Compliance; QA Managers Quality Division Manager Managerst Plant Manager CA (Dept.) QA Department Responsible Quality Division QA Manager QA Manager Procedures Managers Plant Manager CA (Dept.) Responsible Quality Responsible Quality Divison QA Manager QA Manager Instru-tions Division Manager (s): if affected, Plant Manager Other Offsite Responsible Offsite Manager, Responsible Offsite Responsible Manager Appropriate Manager Procedures and Staff Organization CA Manager Instructions Procurement Responsible Staff Manager, Responsible Offsite Responsible Manager Appropriate Manager Documents Organiationg QA Manager Plant Staff Responsible Division Manager Plant Manager Responsible Section CA Manager Head Special Test Plant Staff' Responsible Engineers QA Plant Manager Plant Administrative Procedures Managers Review of Operations Coordinator Committee Station Procedures Plant Staff Responsible Engineerr QA Plant Manager Plant Administrative Managers Review of Operations Coordinator h ittee Test & Calibration Plant Staff Responsible Division Manager Plant Manager Plant Administrative Procedures 2 Main- Responsible Engineers Coordinator tenance & Repair QA Manager Proceduress Special Process Procedures Page 1 of 2 Revision 33 - Septenber 1984
_ _ . . , _ . _ m . _ _ . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _- - _ . _ _ - - _ _ _ . - - ~
+
. - ; w 5
, ) 4, -
I 4
] s .
i 1 i h 1 PSAR 1 193E2 17.2.6-1 (coot'd) e goounget(3) Prgsered(2) poviseed(3) )1 Approved (3) Issued (3) j het & Cal. amapaamihle Offsite manager, Beepensible Offsite Responsible Manager Appropriate Manager j Freseeeroe (eemt) Staff Orgemisaties: E Manager ' l ISI Agent Roepensible Ageet Managers; Agent Managers; LII40 Nuclear Engineering l t Imeervice ansponsible Weclear Engineers Soviewer(s) Department Inspecties (ISI) Om manager Program : g Beclear Engineering Beepensible Divielen u===9=rt Nuclear Engineering Nuclear Engineering ' 4 Departmost S Manager Departments Manager Department 3 l 1 i 1 4 Plant Staff Beepensible Beclear Engineers Plant Manager Plant Administrative , j m Manager Coordinator l - Beclear Engineering Responsible Nuclear Engineer Weclear Engineering Wuclear Engineering ' ]i Modificaties and Departmost and/or and/or Beepensible Plant Department Manager Department or Records tosign Seceements Plant Staff Engineers Oh Hamager Beclear and/or Plant Manager Management t
- Revieur Boards Reviser of j Operations Committee Baclear mage === ring Beepensible suelear Engineer Plant Manager Plant Administrative j PW 3epartment and/or and/or meepensible plant Coordinator i
. Immelving- . Plant Staff Begineers S y Beclear } Waresolved Safety , Bowieur Boards Rev ear of i t Omeetiens Operatione caemittee , 1 i ! Origiasting Assigned Regineers of Vice President, Manager, NOSD [ Changes to PEAR 3epartment Appropriate Disciplimeer Nuclear Operations Licensing Engineerr en manager j I i r (1) Revisions and addoada are subject to the same reviser, approval, and distribution cycle. ! (2) or designated support orgemisaties each as consultant, architect-engineer, etc., or other internal LILCO organizations. l (3) Besignated alternates may perforum for individual ===ma. ; Page 2 of 2 Revision 33 - September' 1984 { i ! l j "~ I-
I s s . L 4
~
'9 l
I EMCUT3WE OPPCER I . EXECUffwE VICE Ppsensasi I I i PRES NT GAS N M maart sAR - AgguRAleCE ENGINEERING & ESIDENT FOSS8L ELECTRICAL OPERATIONS ,,QETdv , PftOOuCTIOes AcasNetSTRATION OPERATIONS I i l A&aIETAsti ! ! !
***" ASSISTANT MANAGER
-R TO " ELECTRICAL GAS sySTEtt OUALITY gEssEstAL VICE PRESCENT g asAaNTEteAseCE gygyggg OPEIRATIONS & AgguRAleCE SEgewsCES NtsCLEAR SERVICES AD00SMSTRATION OPERATIONS
,PelocuCT DEPhatTMEteT DEPARTMEDIT DERARTMENT DEPARTe8ENT g ,
I w asAseAGER OuaLsTy
#888"A"C" -
NUCLEAst "8' R EWissEERg nyg DIRECTOR EmEm - COe0PUTER Div tSIOes BOARD DEPARTRIENT DEPARTMENT SERVICES anaseAGER taaseAGER M TV WEDEPfleOENT RAA88AGER hagE NUCLEAR ENGsesEEReseG -- QE,'" tones COesTROL _ SAFETY EMCTRICE ADeseNISTRATION - ASANAGER PURCHASING T ENGINEERWeG DEPARTISENT SYSTEM ANALYST $ DEPARTesENT DEPARTesENT M MRTM NT QUALITY # " 8tELIA81LITY SYSTEasS _ ENGueEEReeG F8G.17. 2.1 - 1 Review OP e,y,gion N MSsGN & LILCO ORGANIZATION FOR OPERAT: OMS _ f " " * *
- _ QUALITY ASSURANCE COesMITTEE SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATON-UNIT 1 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT REvtSON 33. SEPTEMBER 1984
_}}