ML20113A443
| ML20113A443 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 03/28/1985 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20113A440 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8504100376 | |
| Download: ML20113A443 (2) | |
Text
..
['
,k, UNITED STATES 4
.g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
(",
j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20$55 v/
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SUPPORTING-AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-30 UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY CALLAWAY PLANT, ON'IT 1 D_0CKET N0. STN 50-483
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated December 28, 1984, Union Electric Company (the licensee) requested an amendment to Facility Operating License No. NPF-30 for operation of the Callaway Plant in Callaway County, Missouri.
The amendment approves a revision to License Condition 2.C.(3)(a) of Facility Operating License No. NPF-30.
2.0 EVALUATION License Condition 2.C.(3)(a) has been revised to incorporate a November 30, 1985. deadline for completion of environmental qualification of electrical e'quipment important to safety instead of the present'ly imposed March 31, 1985 deadline.
By letter dated December 21, 1984, SNUPPS indicated that all required 1
4 equipment qualification programs for Balance of Plant equipment have been completed, and all required NSSS qualification programs have been i
completed,by Westinghouse with the exception of ESE-43, ESE-44, and HE-7. The SNUPPS submittal included revised Justifications for Interim Operation (JI0s) applicable to NSSS qualification programs ESE-43 and i
ESE-44, "Incore Thermocouples, Connectors and Reference Junction Box."
l Thus, with these revisions, all' outstanding JI0s applicable to the Callaway plant are up-to-date.
SNUPPS stated that the three remaining qualification programs have not been completed due to test complications.
These three qualification programs are currently scheduled to be com-pleted as follows:
ESE-43 by August 6, 1985; ESE-44 by October 4, 1985; and HE-7 by September 27, 1985. TF.: licensee has stated that. all out-standing JI0s are-adequate to sur ort safe plant operation until the s
i
. qualification programs are com".eted by the revised November 30, 1985 deadline.
The staff has revicwed the licensee's submittal and has co cluded that the request for extension -is timely and demonstrates good cause for the requested extension.
The staff concurs with the licensee's conclusion that all cutstanding JI0s will remain valid through November 30, 1985 l
and that the eqJipment will not have any significant degradation during l
this exten<!cd time period.
Based on the information and analyses pro-vided the staff finds that the requested schedule change.is acceptable and License Condition.2.C.(3)(a) may be revised accordingly.
8504100356 850328
^
PDR ADOCK 05000483 P
PDR y
r N
i
,\\ N
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
This amendment involves a c1ange to a requirement with respect to install ation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined Lin 10 CFR Part 20..The staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.
The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that this amendment involves no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public comment on such finding. Accordingly, this amendment meets the eligibility) criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR Section 51.22(c (9).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
4.0 CONCLUSION
We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the
~
public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner; and
~
(2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's
, regulations and the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to
'the conmon defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Date: !!AR 2 81985 Principal Contributors:
J. A. Stevens, LB#1
~
A. Masciantonio, EQB L
-