ML20112J522
| ML20112J522 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 03/29/1985 |
| From: | Roisman A TRIAL LAWYERS FOR PUBLIC JUSTICE, P.C. |
| To: | Treby S NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| References | |
| CON-#285-379 OL-2, NUDOCS 8504050191 | |
| Download: ML20112J522 (2) | |
Text
.
e
,p TmAl. LAWYMS FOR Pusuc JusTicr P.C.euwao-e
- = - -
y Couman <= At vow i
su Tt6ii
- c.;rg 2000 P STREET. NORTHWEST 9F mrNaNy t -
%ASHINGTON, D.C. 20036 (202)463-8600 oscumE onucto.
. $ m. -:
ill :52 o
A mu.
,.1 l
sim Ano.NEY KEMN HANNON l
SCENCE AMO.
g ],.
5AN,D'cg "
March 29, 1985 35-6 '
A o
4 Stuart E. Treby, Esquire office of Executive Legal Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 4350 East-West Highway, 4th Floor l
Bethesda, Maryland 20814 i
i
{
Re:
In the Matter of Texas Utilities Generating Company, et al. (Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 50-445-2 and 50-446-2 e
Dear Mr. Treby:
During the November interviews of the EG&G personnel a j
representation was made that they were going to continue to review information provided to them by the Staff in order to determine a need to modify or alter their opinion if necessary.
I We assume that the panel has been provided with such things as the TRT Reports, the SSERs, the transcripts of relevant Department of Labor hearings and depositions, and the ASLB i
j hearing record itself.
Since this is a relatively quiet time in i
this case, I believe it would be appropriate to schedule another interview with the EG&G panel as soon as possible.
Please inform me of when we can expect to see their next report, and how soon they will be available to discuss their reactions to the additional information they have reviewed.
i l
It is our understanding that the Staf f harassment and intimidation panel will complete their work in a few weeks.
We are somewhat surprised that no meeting was ever scheduled between the witnesses or former workers and the NRC panel, particularly since this practice has been followed by the contention.5 panel.
]
i We would like to know how, in reaching their conclusion, the i
haratsment and intimidation panel is going to incorporate the j
numerous other statements and complaints of craf t personnel or l
other QA/QC personnel who did not testify in the hearing, but i
whose experience contributes to an understanding of how the i
planes general atmosphere affected the safety of the plant.
We 4
are particularly concerned that'information provided to the TRT by craft employees about the numerous methods used to " trick" i
i QA/QC personnel be considered by both EG&G and the harassment and intimidation cana'
[0%k $
p a
T)SO3
r.
Finally, as you know, it has been the Intervenor';s I
continuing desire to expedite the hearing process on these issues.
Since the depositions of the principal individuals responsible for the TRT findings and the SSERs will eventually have to be taken we propose that the following individuals be made available by the agency at your earliest convenience for deposition:
1.
Darrel Eisenhut 2.
Vince Noonan 3.
C. Hale 4.
David Terrero 5.
R.J. Masterson 6.
Herbert Livermore 7.
Larry Shaw 8.
J.
Zudans 9.
Larry Chen 10.
Jim Gagliardo Sincerely, h
hf Anthony
. Roisman d Executive Director cca Service List
--