ML20112E717
| ML20112E717 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 01/07/1985 |
| From: | CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20112E705 | List: |
| References | |
| PROC-850107, NUDOCS 8501150241 | |
| Download: ML20112E717 (249) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:- - . - _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ y . ) PGP Paget i Rev.: 0 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT PROCEDURES GENERATION PACKAGE Date Prepared: January 7,1965 A 0 0 E PDR
7 I PGP Page: 11 Rev.: O Procedures Generation Package
~
Table of Contents Seetion Titie Page 1.0 PURPOSE 1 2.0 SCOPE 1 3.0 RESPONSIBILITY 1 .
4.0 REFERENCES
1 3.0 DEFINITIONS 2 6.0; GENERAL 4 7.0 ATTACHMENTS 5 7.1 Attachasnt 1 - OAP-0507, Preparation of Plant 6 Emergency Instruct Lons 7.2 s Attachnent 2 - PEI Verification Plan 20 : 7.3 Attachment 3 - PEI Validation Plan 32 7.4 Attachment 4 - PEI Training PIAN 49 7.5 Attachment 5 - Perry Specific Technical Guide- 51 lines Developannt Methodology 7.6 Attachment 6 - Perry Specific Technical Guide- 55 lines 7.7 Attachment 7 - Deviations from the Generic 108 Cuidelines ; e i e A-
e .. , v
' :. PGP
[ Page: 111 Rev.: 0
. .4-
, List of Ef fective Pages 4.
. g Revision PGP-1 thru 0 PGP-iii-e v-c PGP-1 thru 0
{- PGP-246 1 1 ,;, *,, y ." . Oft gY n^ h-4
- ..,i.
,%is
+
(
- j,.; - i ), c '
,c p h
.h j l. ~ 0 4
SCOPE OF REVISION:
- l, ,}'r- <
f. a',- 1 5
+\}
^.I , ,
t,', ,,_ s-t a
- I r $+
.f, f
i
;m
(-
~
s
)
/)\ PGP Page: 1 s Rev.: O PROCEDURES GENERATION PACKAGE 1.0 PURPOSE To provide guidance in the development and implementation of Plant Emergency Instructions (PEIs) . y- ;' 2.0 SCOPE This document outlines the program at Perry Nuclear Power Plant for developing PEIs based on plant specific technical guidelines developed from generid' guidelines prepared by the BWROG Emergency Procedures Committee. Specific details are contained in the respec-tive attachments. The following elements are identified and described in this imple-menting document:
- 1. Plant-Specific Technical Guidelines
- 2. Writers Guide for PEIs
- 3. PEI Verification Program
- 4. PEI Validation Program
- 5. PEI Training Program i
N
! D i4 +
g , 3.0 RESPONSIBILITY 3.1 The Operations Section General Supervisor is responsible for imple-manting the requirements of this document.
^\
4.04 REFERENCES
-4.1 INPO Guideline 82-016, Rev.1, Emergency Operating Procedures Im-plementing Guidelines.
'* _4.2 INPO Guideline 83-007, Emergency Operating Procedures Generation Package Guidelines.
5 4.3 INFO Guideline 82-017, Emergency Operating Procedures Writing ,
;g, Guidelines.
i
.>.. 't g 4g ' ~
. l.. ..E <g i 3
PGP Page: 2 Rev.: 0 4.4 INPO Guideline 83-006, Emergency Operating Procedures Validation Guidelines. 4.5 INPO Guideline 83-004, Emergency Operating Procedures Verification Guideline s. 4.6 NUREG-0899. 4.7 NUREG-0737, Supplement 1. 4.8 Letter, Davidson (CEI) to Schwencer (NRC), 11/16/82. - 4.9 Letter, Youngblood (NRC) to Edelman (CEI), 5/16/83. 4.~10 Letter, Edelman (CEI) to Youngblood (NRC), 5/27/83, PY-CEI/NRR-045 L. 4.11 PAP-0507, Preparation, Review, Approval, Revision and Cancellation of Instructions. 5.0 DEFINITIONS 5.1 Control Room Simulator A device that dynamically models the plant functions as presented in the control room. 5.2 Emergency Operating Procedure Guidelines (EPGs) Generic guidelines developed by the BWR Owner's Group that provide technical bases for the development of PEIs. 5.3 Perry Specific Technical Guidelines (PSTG) Guidelines developed from the EPG's which have been modified to ' reflect the Perry design. Included as Attachment 6. 5.4 Plant Emergency Instructions (PEIs) Symptom-based instructions directing operator actions necessary to mitigate consequences of transients and accidents that may cause plant parameters to exceed reactor protection setpoints, engineered safety feature setpoints, or other appropriate technical limits. 5.5' Scenario A' structural plan of parameter and plant symptom changes that pro-vide operating cues for the conduct of assessment. .-
. . - , - . . . . . . _ _ . . . . . . . , . . . . - _ _ ~ , . . . . - . _ . - - _ -
i PGP Page: 3 Rev.: 0 5.6 Simulator Validation Method of validation whereby control room operators perform actual control functions on simulator equipment during a scenario for an observer / review team. 5.7 Source Documents Documents or records upon which PEIs are based. 2 5.8 Sympt oms _
. Plant characteristics that directly or indirectly indicate plant status.
5.9 Technical Accuracy A characteristic of PEIs that indicates the degree to which proper incorporation of generic and/or plant-specific technical information from PEI source documents and plant hardware has been made. 5.10 Validation The evaluation performed to determine that the actions specified in , the .PEI can be followed by trained operators in order to manage the emergency conditions. 4 5.11 - Verification The evaluation performed to confirm the written correctness of the PEIs and to ensure that the generic and/or plant-specific technical aspects have been properly incorporated.
- 5.12 j[?tk-Through Validation .
Mhthod of validation whereby control room operators conduct a ' step-by-step enactment of their actions during a scenario for an observer / review team without necessarily carrying out the actual control functions.
. 5.13 Written Correctness A characteristic of PEIs that indicates the degree to which proper incorporation of information from the writers guide for PEIs and other appropriate administrative policies has been made.
See also individual attachments.
l PGP Page: 4 Rev.: 0 6.0 GENERAL 6.1 The Procedures Generation Package is broken down into five main sections: plant specific technical guidelines, a writer's guide, a Each verification plan, a validation plan, and a training plan. will be briefly described here and followed by a detailed descrip-tion later in this document. 6.2 The Perry Specific Technical Guidelines will be developed from Revision 3 of the Emergency Procedures Guidelines (EPGs) prepared by the BWR Owner's Group Emergency Procedures Committee. When . Revision 4 is completed and approved, the revised information will be incorporated using the established revision, review, and approval process (PAP-0507) . 4 The methodology for development of the Perry guidelines is pre-sented as Attachment 5. The actual guidelines are included as Attachment 6. Deviations between the EPGs and the Perry Specific Technical Guide- ? lines will be identified, analyzed to determine the safety signifi-cance of the deviations, and technically justified. They are included as Attachment 7. ! 6.3 The PEI Writer's Guide developed here will be incorporated into the permanent plant procedures manual as an Operations Section Adminis-
-trative Procedure, Preparation of Plant Emergency Instructions.
This will promote consistency among the PEI and ensuing revisions, independent of the composition of the writing team. The writer's guide _will be revised, as necessary, based on feedback from training evolutions, operating experience, and validation. It will specify: format, organization, and level of detail. The approved writer's I guide is included as Attachment 1. 6.4 The Verification Plan.is the evaluation performed to confirm the I ! technical correctness of the PEIs and to ensure that applicable generic and plant-specific technical information has been incor- !: porated properly. This evaluation also checks that the human l factor aspects presented in the writer's guide have been applied. It will specify: how the verification will be performed and docu-mented, how discrepancies will be resolved, and how the results are reviewed and used -to generate revisions to PEIs. The Verification Plan is included as Attachment 2. 6.5 The Validation Plan is the evaluation performed to determine that - the actions specified in the PEIs can be perforned by the operator in order to manage the emergency conditions effectively. It will [ validate those parts' of the PEIs not covered by any technical l . evaluation of the generic technical guidelines. It will specify: !- how (use of simulator or control room walk.-through) steps will be - 1: I L- _ . _ . . _ . . . . . _ ~ . . _ . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ . . .
=
PGP Page: 5 Rev.: 0 validated and documented, how discrepancies will be resolved, and how the results are reviewed and used to generate revisions to the PEIs, changes in conduct of operations (including shif t composi-tion), and modifications to the control room design. The Validation Plan is included as Attachment 3. The process used to identify plant-specific parameters and other plant-specific information and control capability needs and how the characteristics of needed instruments and controls will be deter-mined will be described in the Detailed Control Room Design Review Program Plan. 6.6 The Training Plan provides a description of the training objectives and the methods used to accomplish these objectives. Also covered are the methods for providing training when PEIs are revised and the evaluations to be performed to indicats satisfactory completion of the training objectives. The Training Plan is included as Attachment 4. 7.0 ATTACIMENTS 7.1 Attachment 1 - OAP-0507, Preparation of Plant Emergency Instruc-tions. 7.2 Attachment 2 '- PEI Verification Plan. 7.3 Attachment 3 - PEI Validation Plan. 7.4 Attachment 4 - PEI Training Plan. 7.5 Attachment 5 - Perry Specific Technical Guidelines Development Me thodology. 7.6 ' Attachment 6 - Perry Specific Technical Guidelines. 7.7 . Attachment 7 - Deviations from the Generic Guidelines.' J
,,,e v--,- -- - -%cw, , -en, m y v , r- - c.4-m.,ww,,w.-.yy-,p,-.ww,.. *-yg-w,w,,- . ,s ee , . e ,3 -%,
PGP Page: 6 Attachment 1 OMlB: 0AP-0507 Page: i Rev.: 0 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT OPERATIONS MANUAL TITLE: PREPARATION OF PIANT EMERGENCY INSTRUCTIONS REVISION: 0 EFFECTIVE DATE: h M " 4,1984 PREPARED: C. S. Orogvany SUBMITTED: N*k D *5'*d 9 PERRY PLANT. TECHNICAL DEPARTMENT
,// /
SUBMITIED: M TggagA PERRT MIANT OPERATI'ONS DEPARTMENT REVIEWED: \ C , wMe*w Q APPROVED: MANA R - NUCLEAR Q.A. DEPARTMENT PORC REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL MEETING NUMBER: 84-3I APPROVED: l MANtER) - PERRY PLANT TECHNICAL DEPARTMENT APPROVED: , _l a2 0 . fA. ' l MANAGilt- PERRY PLANT OPE MTIONS DEPARTMENT l ., _ _ _ _ _ - . . . . - _, _ ~ _ -
l PGP Page: 7 Attachment 1 (Cont.) OM1B: 0AP-0507 Page: 11 Rev.: 0 Preparation o f Plant Emergency Instructions OAP-0507 Table of Contents Section Title Pajgt 1.0 PURPOSE 1 4 2.0 SCOPE 1 . 3.0 RESPONSIBILITY 1
4.0 REFERENCES
1 5.0 DEFINITIONS 1 6.0 DETAILS 2 6.1 Instruction Organization 2 6.2 PEI Applicability 2 6.3 Equipment Numbering 2 6.4 Use of Names and Component Identification Numbers 3 6.5 Use of-Operating Terms 3 6.6 Use of Cautions and Notes 3 6.7 Page Margins, Hesdings and Endings 3 16.8 Page Numbering 3 6.9 Eona Numbering 4 6.10 Instruction Step Numbering 4 4 6.11 Instruction Step Length and Content 4 6.12 Use of Logic Terms 5 6.13 Calculations 6 6.14 Use of Underlining 6 6.15 Referencing and Branching to Other Instructions 7 or Steps 6.16 Level of Detail 7 6.17 Printed Operator Aids 7 6.18 Numerical Values 9 6.19 Abbreviations, Letter Symbols, and Acronyms 9 6.20 Rotation of Pages 10 6.21 Hyphenation 10 6.22 Use.of Foldout Pages 10
.6.23- Use of Oversized Pages 10 6.24 Use of Reduced Pages 11 6.25 Reproduction 11 6.26 Revision Nhrkings -11 7.0 ATTACHMENTS 11
,, , -,,w,,... ... . - - - -m. ,.,,.n- .,,- . , . . _ . . . ~ , , _ . _ . . , . , . , , .
PGP Page: 8 Attachment 1 (Cont.) OMIB: OAP-0507 Page: 111 Rev.: O List of Effective Pages Pg Revision OAP-0507-1 thru O OAP-0507-iii OAP-0507-1 thru 0
'OAP-0507-11 t
SCOPE OF REVISION: 9
, - . . ~ , ,
, , , , . , , . , , . . . - .. , - . - , . , - , - - . . , , . . ,,v.-. .
PGP Page: 9 Attachment 1 (Cont.) OM1B: 0AP-0507 Page: 1 Rev.: 0 PREPARATION OF PIANT EMERGENCY INSTRUCTIONS 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to provide administrative and tech-nical guidance on the preparation of Plant Emergency Instructions (PEIs). 2.0 SCOPE This procedure applies to the preparation of PEIs, found in the PNPP Operations Manual, Volume 4, Part C. The requirements for review, approval, revision and cancellation of instructions are contained in PAP-0507, Prepration, Review, Approval, Revision and Cancellation of Instructions. 3.0 RESPONSIBILITY 3.1 The Operations Section General Supervisor is responsible for imple-mentation of this procedure.
4.0 REFERENCES
'4.1 INPO Guideline 82-017, Emergency Operating Procedures Writing Guideline s.
4.2 OAP-0502, Preparation of System Operating Instructions. 4.3 BWROG Emergency Procedures Guidelines, Appendix B, Section 3.0. 4.4 PAP-0507, Preparation, Review, Approval, Revision, and Cancellation of Instructions. 5.0 DEFINITIONS See Reference 4.2, and Reference 4.3.
, , .-, ~ . - . - - - , - . , - -
. . , . , - - . - - - - . - , . g
PGP Page: 10 At tachment 1 (Cont.) OMLB: 0AP-0507 Page: 2 Rev.: 0 6.0 DETAILS 6.1 Instruction Organization The following section headings will be used for PEIs. 1.0 SCOPE An explanation of the intent of the instruction. 2.0 ENTRY CONDITIONS Those alarms, indications, operating conditions, automatic system actions, or other unique symptoms to be used by the operator in order to determine whether or not the instruction is applicable to the current plant conditons. 3.0 OPERATOR ACTIONS Short, concise, identifiable instructions that give appropriate directions to the operator to place the plant in a safe con-dition. 4.0 CONTINGENCIES Contingency actions required as a result of degraded conditions beyond those covered in OPERATOR ACTIONS. , 5.0 ATTACHMENTS p Figures, graphs, or other information required by the operator to implement the PEI. 6.2 PEI Applicability PEIs will be written so that they are applicable to Unit 1. 6.3 Equipment Numbering _ l See Reference 4.2. f l m
PGP Page: 11 Attachment 1 (Cont.) OMlB: 0AP-0507 Page: 3 Rev.: 0 6.4 Use of Names and Component Identification Numbers See Reference 4.2. However, in the intent of conciseness, panel names and electrical names will generally not be used. 6.5 Use of Operating Terms See Reference 4.2. 6.6 Use of Cautions and Notes Cautions and notes generally do not direct action. Use cautions and notes in the instruction as follows: CAUTION An explanation that pertains to personnel or equipment safety and precedes the applicable step. The caution statement will be distin-guished from the instruction by the two lines of asterisks shown. NOTE: An explanation that pertains to methods of operation or
, implementation of instructions. A note may precede or
-follow the applicable step. This typed block alongside the NOTE heading will be inset on the lef t margin.
j . Notes and Cautions should be written so that they are complete on one page and can be read without interruption by intervening steps. 6.7 Page Margins, Headings and Endings Mkrgins should be about one inch from the lef t edge and one inch from the right edge for all pages. Headings (page numbering) and endings of each page should be about one inch from top and Wttom. This is to avoid problems when the instructions are duplicated and bound. A dual-column f t rmat will be used. The left-hand column is desig-nated for Instruction Steps, and the right-hand column is designated for Contingency Steps to be taken when the expected response is not obtained. 6.8 Page Numbering l See Reference 4.4. l
PGP Page: 12 Attachment 1 (Cont.) OM1B: 0AP-0507 Page: 4 Rev.: 0 6.9 Form Numbering See Reference 4.4. 6.10 Instruction Step Numbering Instruction steps in a section or subsection will be numbered and indented as follows:
- 1. Verify . . . .
- a. Che ck . . . . .
- 1) Position . . . . (not desirable)
The same step number scheme is to be used in both the right and left columns of the instruction. Every effort should be made to avoid using the 1) level of in-denting. 6.11 Instruction Step Length and Content Instruction steps will be concise and precise. Conciseness denotes brevity; preciseness means exactly defined. Thus, instructions should be short and emact. This is easily stated, but not so easily achieved. General rules to be used in meeting these objec-tives are as follows:
- 1. Instruction steps should deal with only one idea.
- 2. Short, simple sentences should be used in preference to long, compound, or complex sentences.-
- 3. Complex evolutions should be prescribed in a series of steps, with each step made as simple as practicable.
- 4. Objects of operator actions should be specifically stated.
This includes identification of exactly what is to be done and to wha t.
- 5. For steps that involve an action verb relating to three or more objects, the objects should be listed separately.
- 6. Limits should be expressed quantitatively whenever possible (refer to 6.18) .
7.- Mandatory sequence of steps is assumed unless otherwise stated. !~ 8. Identification of components and parts should be complete.
_ _ __ = _ . . . _ _ . . ___ . m. _ . ._ - . . . _ PGP Page: 13 Attachment 1 (Cont.) OM1B: 0AP-0507 Page: 5 r Rev.: 0
- 9. Expected results of routine tasks need not be stated.
- 10. When requiring resetting or restoration of an alarm or trip, list the expected results immediately following the resetting or restoration if it would be beneficial to the operator.
11.. When system response dictates a time frame within which the instruction must be accomplished, prescribe such time frame. If possible, however, avoid using time to initiate operator o actions. Operator actions should be related to plant para-meters.
- 12. When anticipated system response may adversely affect instru-ment indications, describe the conditions that will likely in-troduce instrument error and means of determining if instrument error has occurred by using a NOTE.
- 13. .
When additional confirmation of system response is considered , necessary, prescribe the backup readings to be made.
.6.11.1 " Instruction Step" Column The lef t-hand column of the dual-column format will contain the Instruction Steps. The following rules are established
~
for this column, in addition to the general rules above.
- 1. Expected indications should be presented in this column.
2.: Operator actions in 'this column should be appropriate for the expected indications. 6.11.2 " Contingency Steps" Column Contingency Steps will be presented in the right-hand column of the dual-column format. . Contingency Steps are operator . actions that should be taken in the event a stated condition, event, or task does not represent or achieve the expected - L result. . The need for Contingency Steps occurs in conjunction l with tasks ; involving verification, observation, confirmation, and monitoring. Contingency Steps should be specified for each circumstance in which the expected results or actions might not be achieved. The Contingency Steps should identify, as appropriate, direc-tions to override automatic controls and to initiate manually what is-normally automatically initiated. [ 6.12 Use of Logic Terms [ L The logic terms and, or,' not, g, if not, when, and then are of ten . .* necessary to describe precisely a set of conditions or sequence of
~
,. - ...,~ . . . - . - . -,-.-- - - . - , . . , , - . , . -. --- ,..c,, - , - - , . . , - - ~
wh PGP i Page: 14 Attachment 1 (Cont.) OMlB: OAP-0507 Page: 6 Rev.: 0 actions. When logic statements are used, logic terms will be highlighted so that all the conditions are clear to the operator. i_ Emphasis will be achieved by underlining. 4 The use of Jyy1 and cg; within the same action shall be avoided. When and and or are used together, the logic can be very ambiguous. The dual-column format used equates to the logic: if not the action in the lef t-hand column, then follow the action specified in the right-hand column.
, Use other logic terms as follows: -
- 1. When attention should be called to combinations of conditions, the word and shall be placed between the description of each condition. The word and shall not be used to join more than
- three conditions. If four or more conditions need to be joined, a list format shall be used.
[- 2. The word ojt shall be used when calling attention to alternative combinations of conditions. The use of the word or shall always be in the inclusive sense. To specify the7xclusive "or", the following may be used: "either A or B but not both".
- 3. When action steps are contingent upon certain conditions or combinations of conditions, the step shall begin with the words if or when followed by a description of the condition
-or codlitions, a comma, the word then, followed by the action l.,
'~ to be taken. When is used for an expected condition. ))[ is
. used for an unexpected but possible condition.
4.. Use of if not should be limited to those cases -in which the operator must respond to the second aof two possible conditions.
))[ should be used to specify the first condition.
t' (: 5. Then shall not be used at the end of an action step to instruct p the operator to perform the next step because it runs actions - , y together. L 6.13 Calculations i- Mathematical calculations should be avoided in PEIs. If a value has to be determined in order to perform a step, a chart or graph should be used whenever possible. l 6.14 Use of Underlinina Underlining will be used for emphasis of logic terms, and the words CAUTION, NOTE, and concurrently. ?
. i L
E
_m_ .. . . - _ _. _ m . __ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ . PGP Page: 15 Attachment 1 (Cont.) OM1B: 0AP-0507 Page: 7 Rev.: 0 6.15 Referencing and Branching to Other Instructions or Steps Referencing is used when additional instructions or steps will be 4 esecuted concurrently with the instruction presently being used. Referencing other steps within the instruction being used, either future or completed steps, should be minimized. Branching will be used when the operator is to exit an instruction or step and enter another instruction or step. The following are typical branching phrases: If[ . . . then proceed to . . . . If . . . then exit . . . and enter . . .
))[ . . . then . . . and proceed to . . .
6.16 Level of Detail l , Too much detail in PEIs should be avoided in the interest of being able to effectively execute the instructions in a timely manner. The level of detail required is the detail that a newly trained and licensed operator would require during an emergency condition. To assist in determining the level of PEI detail, the following i general rulas apply.
- 1. For simple evolutions within the knowledge level of the oper-ator which can be performed in the Control Room, a simple direction without details is acceptable. " Start HPCS in the test mode from the CST to the Suppression Pool".
- 2. For control circuitry that executes an entire function upon actuation of the control switch,' the action verb appropriate to the component suffices without further amplification of how to manipulate the control device; for example, "Open HPCS TO CNTMT OTBD ISOL VALVE, #E22-F004".
- 3. Standard practices for observing for abnormal results need not be prescribed within procedural steps. For example, observa-tion of noise, vibration, erratic flow, or discharge pressure
- need not be specified by steps that start pumps.
6.17 Printed Operator Aids When information is presented using graphs, charts, tables, and
. figures, these aids must be self-explanatory, legible, and readable under the expected conditions of use and within the reading pre-cision of the operator.
' Figures include graphs, drawings, diagrams, and illustrations. The ,.
following guides are presented for uniformity.
~
. - . _ _ _ _ _ - - . . ._._- -- - . . = _
PGP Page: 16 Attachment 1 (Cont.) OMlB: OAP-0507 Page: 8 Rev.: 0 (When applicable, figures should be the same as those used in ERIS displays). (If possible, figures and tables should be arranged so that they can Ebe used without having to rotate the pages).
- 1. The figure number and its title are placed three line spaces below the figure field.
- 2. The figure field must not violate specified page margins.
- 3. The figure field should be of sufficient size to offer good readability.
- 4. The essential message should be clear; simple presentations are preferred.
- 5. Grid lines of graphs should be at least 1/8-inch apart; numbered grid lines should be bolder than unnumbered grid lines.
- 6. Labeling of items within the figure should be accompanied by arrows pointing to the item.
. 7. The items within the figure should be oriented naturally insofar as possible. For example, height on a graph should be along the vertical axis. 8.- In general, items within the figure should be labeled.
- 9. Lines in figures should be reproducible.
Tables should be typed using the following rules.
~
- 1. Type style and size should be the same as that for the rest of the instruction.
- 2. The table number and title should be located above the table field and three line spaces below preceding text.
- 3. A heading should be entered for each column and centered within the column; the first letter of words in the colusn headings i should be capitalized.
4
- 4. Horizontal lines should be placed above and below the column headings; vertical lines, while desirable, are not necessary or required. -
- 5. Tabular headings should be aligned as follows:
- s. Horizontally by related entries.
e
PGP Page: 17 Attachment 1 (Cont.) OM1B: 0AP-0507 Page: 9 Rev.: 0
- b. Vertically by decimal point for numerical entries,
- c. Vertically by first letter for word entries; however, run-over lines should be indented three spaces.
- 6. Double spacing between horizontal entries suf fices to segre-gate such entries, although horizontal lines may also be used if desired. If used, double horizontal lines should be used above and below the column headings.
- 7. There should not be a vacant cell in the table. If no entry is necessary, "N/A" should be entered to indicate not applicable.
6.18 Numerical Values The use of numerical values should be consistent with the following rules:
- 1. For numbers less than one, the decimal point should be pre-ceded by a zero; for example: 0.1.
- 2. The number of significant digits should be determined based on number of significant digits available from the display and the reading precision of the operator.
- 3. Acceptable values should be specified in such a way that addition and subtraction by the user is avoided if possible.
This can generally be done by stating acceptable values as limits. Examples: 510*F maximum; 300 psig minimum; 580' to 600*F. For calibration points, statement of the midpoint and its lower and upper limits for each data cell would accomplish the same purpose; for example,10 mil 11 amperes (9.5 to 10.5). Avoid using .
- 4. Engineering units should always be specified for numerical values of process variables. They should be the same as those used on the Control Room displays, for example: psig instead of psi.
6.19 tobreviations, Letter Symbols, and Acronyms The use of abbreviations should be minimized because they may be confusing to those who are not thoroughly familiar with them. Abbreviations may be used where necessary to save time and space, and when their' meaning is unquestionably clear to the intended reader. Abbreviation other than those listed in Attachment 1 of OAP-0502, and Table I of the EPGs should not be used. Consistency should be maintained throughout the instruction. s n y e- - - w . s w- -v, w-,v w ~ma , ww w- ,--e-r e w-e---
Y PGP Page: 18 Attachment 1 (Cont.) OMlB: OAP-0507 Page: 10 Rev.: O Capitalization of abbreviations should be uniform. If the abbrevi-ation is comprised of lowercase letters, it should appear in lower-case in a title or heading. The period should be omitted in abbre-viations except in cases where the omission would result in con-fusion. Letter symbols may be used to represent operations, quantities, elements, relations, and qualities. An acronym is a type of symbol formed by the initial letter or letters of each of the successive parts or major parts or a com-pound term. Acronyms may be used if they are defined or commonly used. Abbreviations, symbols, and acronyms should not be overused. Their use should be for the benefit of the reader. They can be beneficial by saving reading time, ensuring clarity when space is limited, and communicating mathematical ideas. 6.20 Rotation'of Pages Rotation of printed matter should be avoided for PEIs. If pages need to be rotated, these rules shall be followed.
- 1. The top of the page with rotated print is the normal left-hand edge.
- 2. -The page margins do not. rotate.
-3. Page identification and numbering will not be rotated. ' 6.21 Hyphenation i
Hyphenation of words should be avoided to facilitate operator reading. 6.22 Use of Foldout- Pages When used, a foldout page is treated as a single page. It should follow the saan format as a standard page except the width is dif-ferent. The page should be folded so that a small margin exists between the fold and the right-hand edge of standard pages. This will reduce the wear of the fold. 6.23 Use of Oversized Pages Oversize pages should not be used. They should be reorganized or reduced to a standard page. If this cannot be done, a foldout page l t should be used. i i L
PGP Page: 19 Attachment 1 (Cont.) OM1B: 0AP-0507 Page: 11 - IAST Rev.: 0 6.24 Use of Reduced Pages Reduced pages should be avoided whenever possible. Final size of reduced pages should be standard page size. Reduced pages shall be readable. 6.25 Reproduction Reproduction will be done on machine producing legible, single-sided copies. 6.26 Revision Markings Revision bars shall be placed as follows: 1.- To indicate a change in the lef t column, place a bar in the left margin alongside the change. . 2. To indicate a change in the right column, place a bar in the [ right margin alongside the change. 7.0 ATTACHMENTS None O
,,.-,,,.,_,,,,y..,. ,r--c.,.--- , , , , . -.:,,--.-.-., 4-, -,~,e,w..- ..,,.-.,,-T - ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' + - - ' '
m . . . _ _ - - . _ _ , , , , , - . , .%,,, .--
PGP Page: 20 Attachment 2 PEI Verification Plan PEI Verfication Plan 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this verification plan is to guide the administra-tive process used in the verification of the Plant Emergency In-structions (PEIs) and to assign responsibilities for carrying out the activities of the process. 2.0 SCOPE This verification plan identifies and directs the phases of the verification process. 3.0 RESPONSIBILITY 3.1 The Manager, Perry Plant Operations Department shall approve all PEIs and revisions af ter recommendation for approval by PORC. 3.2 The Operations Section General Supervisor shall have overall respon-sibility for the PEI verification process. He shall determine when a verification is required and its scope. He shall approve the verification resolutions. 3.3 The Nuclear Design and Analysis Section General Supervising Engineer shall manage the technical evaluation portion of the process. 3.4 The Perry Training Section General Supervisor shall manage the written correctness evaluation portion of the process.
4.0 REFERENCES
4.1 INPO Guideline 83-004, Emergency Operating Procedures Verification Guidelines. 4.2 OAP-0507, Preparation of Plant Emergency Instructions. 5.0 DEFINITIONS See Reference 4.2.
PGP Page: 21 Attachment 2 (Cont.) PEI Verification Plan 6.0 DETAILS Program Description When developing this PEI verification program, the following major items were considered:
- a. How PEI verification will be performed.
, b. How completion of the PEI verification process will be docu-mented.
- c. What process will be used in resolving discrepancies.
The verification plan is based on the industry document Emergency Operating Procedures Verification Guideline (INPO 83-004). The PEI Verification Plan addresses the following objectives:
- 1. PEIs are technically correct, i.e., they accurately reflect the technical guidelines and other PEI source documents.
('
- 2. PEIs are written correctly, i.e., they accurately reflect the administrative procedure on Preparation of Plant Emergency Instructions.
- 3. A correspondence exists between the instructions and control room / plant hardware.
- 4. The language and level of information presented in the PEIs are compatible with the gaalifications, training, and experi-ence of the operating staff.
The process of PEI verification consists of four phases: prepara-tion, assessment, resolution, and documentation.
- 6.1 Preparation Phase I
The preparation phase consists of the following activities:
- a. Designate personnel to conduct the comparative evaluation.
- b. Obtain and review the PEI source documents.
6.1.1 Designate Personnel The GS/GSE's shall appoint the necessary personnel as evalua-tors to conduct the comparative evaluation. Personnel should be appointed based on operating experience and understanding of plant hardware, the EPGs, and the writers guide.
, - - - , , , , , . - - , , - - . . , . , . , - - - - - - - - . . _ . r -
PGP Page: 22 Attachment 2 (Cont.) PEI Verification Plan 6.1.2 Obtain and Review the PEI Source Documents The listing of PEI source documents is provided on Sheet a of the PEI Verification Fbrms (Attachment 1) and shall be reviewed by the personnel conducting the assessment phase. These docu-ments shall be reviewed to ensure they are complete, current, and applicable. Any additional applicable source documents shall be added. 6.2 Assessment Phase In the assessment phase the evaluator shall:
- a. Make a general review of the PEI using the instruction-specific portion of the evaluation criteria (Attachment 1, Sheet b) and source documents,
- b. Indicate on Sheet a of the PEI Verification Forms (Attachment 1) that the evaluation was performed, either by checking the
, acceptable column or be designating the appropriate discrepancy sheet (s) for any discrepancieu identified. t' c. Make a step-by-step review of the PEI using the step, caution, note-specific portion of the evaluation criteria (Attachment 1 , Sheet b) and source documents,
- d. Indicate for each step on Sheet b of the PEI Verification Fbras (Attachment 1) that the comparative evaluation was performed, either by checking _the acceptable column or by designating the appropriate discrepancy sheet for any discrepancies identified.
- e. Complete Sheet c of the PEI Verification Forms (Attachment 1)
-and forward the verification forms with the discrepancy sheets.
to the appropriate supervisor. 6.3 -Resolution Phase In the resolution phase, the appropriate supervisor shall:
- a. Review the evaluator's comments and resolve any conflicts between the writers' and evaluators' comments.
- b. Fbruard potential _ solutions . to the Operations Section General Supervisor for review and approval.
- c. Update applicable source documents and instructions with approved resolutions as directed by the Operations Section General Supervisor.
6~. 4 Documentation Phase The docueentation developed throughout the process will be main-tained in accordance with PAP-1701, Plant Records Management. 17.0 ' ATTACHMENTS 7.1 Attachment 1 - PEI Verification, Sheets a-c.
- PGP Page: 23 Attachment 2 (Cont.)
PEI Verification Plan v b- . 7.2 Attachment 2 - Evaluation Criteria Checklist. 7.3 Attachment 3 - Discrepancy Sheet. ' 1 i i-1 f - 1 I f s a e L-: s 4 ! k r i i I T e 4 L 2 4 F^ t.w.-e -- w r, -,-a e W + we gws-.-.--+ %m-et w w w w.+w een e -Tiev - - - , co-w- i+ % e,- v-t ry v e- w w w w - ey m e w-ww'w e r"e +y w wy w--v y-w-ww9 wee-* vvy g-tm new w -ve g rwe
PGP Page: 24 Attachment 2 (Cont.) PEI Verification Plan Attachment 1 Sheet a PEI Verification Page of PEI
Title:
PEI Number: Revision: Scope of Verification: PEI Source Documents Used:
- 1. EPGs, Rev.
- 2. FSAR, Seetioa Amendmen t
- 3. 0AP-0507, Rev.
4. 5. 6. 7. Evaluators: Instruction - General Verification AREAS ACCEPTABLE DISCREPANCY SHEET f(s) Legibility i PEI Format Consistency Identification Information Technical Accuracy ,
PGP Page: 25 Attachment 2 (Cont.) PEI Verification Plan Attachment 1 (Cont.) Sheet b PEI Verification PEI Rev. Page of STEP, CAUTION, NOTE-SPECIFIC VERIFICATION STEP NLMBER, WRITTEN CORRECTNESS TECHNICAL ACCURACY CAUTION,'OR ACCEPTABLE DISCREPANCY ACCEPTABLE DISCREPANCY NOTE SHEET # SHEET f
PGP Page: 26 Attachment 2 (Cont.) PEI Verification Plan Attachment 1 (Cont.) Sheet c PEI Verification i PEI Rev. Page of Verification Completion Date: Performed By: 4 Reviewed By: All actions required by the verification have been completed and approved. m Operations Section General Supervisor Date e
+
-g ...n -e r- c - . - ~ - , . - . - , - ,.~~,wg -,-wvg--,wv.-e,q g- - - w .wm-- e- we
PGP Page: 27 Attachment 2 (Cont.) PEI Verification Plan Attachment 2 Evaluation Criteria Checklist NOTE: Reference 4.1 is abbreviated as VEG. Reference 4.2 is abbreviated as PEIF. Area Reference I. - INSTRUCTION - GENERAL A. Written Correctness - .____-- .- 1. Legibility
- a. Are the page margins maintained PEIF 6.7 on all pages?
- b. Are the text, tables, graphs, PEIF 6.17 figures, and charts legible to the evaluator?
- 2. PEI Format Consistency
- a. Do the following sections exist in PEIF 6.1 each PEI:
SCOPE ENTRY CONDITIONS OPERATOR ACTIONS CONTINGENCIES ATTACHMENTS s b. Is the operator actions section PEIF 6.7 presented in a dual-coluan format?
- c. Is the cover sheet prepared in PAP-0507, accordance with PAP-05077 Att. I
- d. Does each page correctly provide PEIF 6.8 the following:
DJ 1) instruetion number i 2) revision number
- 3) page numbers s
II. STEP, CAUTION, NOTE-SPECIFIC
, A. Written Correctness
- 1. Information Presentation u
- a. Are instruction steps numbered PEIF 6.10 correctly?
I
, e c or e = - - , < - - w - - ,r, +-e--<,e-ry,- m + - - - , - -
4
, PGP Page: 28 Attachment 2 (Cont.)
PEI Verification Plan Attachment 2 (Cont.) , Area Re ference
- b. Are instruction steps constructed to comply with the following:
- 1) Steps deal with only one idea. PEIF 6.11, 6.16
- 2) Sentences are short and simple. REIF 6.11, 6.16
- 3) Operator actions are specifi- PEIF 6.11, cally stated. 6.16
- 4) Objects of operator actions PEIF 6.11 are specifically stated. -
- 5) Objects of operator actions are PEIF 6.11, adequately stated. 6.16
- 6) If there are three or more PEIF 6.11 objects, they are listed.
- 7) Abbreviations are correct and PEIF 6.19 understandable to the operator.
- d. Do instruction steps make proper use PEIF 6.12 of logic structure?
- e. Are cautions used appropriately? PEIF 6.6
- f. Are cautions placed properly? PEIF 6.6
- g. Are cautions constructed to comply with the following:
- 1) They do not generally contain PEIF 6.6
- operator actions.
E 2) They make proper use of emphasis. PEIF 6.6
- h. Are notes properly used? PEIF 6.6
- 1. Are notes properly placed? PEIF 6.6 j . Are notes worded so that they PEIF 6.6 generally do not contain operator actions?
- k. Are numerical values properly written? PEIF 6.18
- 1. Are values specified in such a .way PEIF 6.18 that mathematical operations are not required of the user?
- m. Is a chart or graph provided in the PEIF 6.13 instruction for necessary operator calculations?
- n. Are units of measurement in the PEI PEIF 6.18 the same as those used on equipment?
s F
.- . , - - - - ,- ,,.-.,,-,-..a, , - , , , , , , , . . - - , - - , , - - - - - -~r--n,, ,------ ---,- m . ,e - - - -
m . _[ ) PGP Page: 29 Attachment 2 (Cont.) PEI Verification Plan I-Attachment 2 (Cont.) 4- /T , Area Reference
, 1
- 2. Procedure Referencing and Branching
- a. Do the referenced and branched PEIF 6.15 instructions identified in the PEls exist for operator use?
- b. Is the use of referencing minimized? PEIF 6.15 s c. Are referencing and branching in- PEIF 6.15 structions correctly worded?
- 1) " concurrently" (referencing)
- 2) "if . . . then proceed to . . . (branching)
, 3) 79]I . . . then exit . . . and enter . . . (branching)
- 4) "if . . . then . . . and proceed to . . . (branching)
- d. Do the instructions avoid routing VEG 3.2.5 users past important information such as cautions preceding steps?
- e. Are the exit conditions compatible VEG 3.2.5 with the entry conditions of the referenced or branched instructions?
B. Technical Accuracy NOTE: Perry Specific Technical Guidelines is abbreviated as PSTG.
.s
[1. Entry Conditions or Symptoms Information i
- a. Are the entry conditions of the PSTG VEG 3.3.1 listed correctly?
y b. 'If additional entry conditions have VEG 3.3.1 been added, do they comply with the
'T -
following: x
- 1) Appropriate entry conditions for which the PEI should be used.
- 2) Not 'ex essive.
- 3. s
- 2. Instructional Step,~ Caution, and Note Information s _
- a.- Are PEI/PSTG differences: VEG 3.3.2
- T
, 1) documented ,
- 2) explained
- b. Is the PSTC ese nicci foundation VEG 3.3.2 (strate 3;" av .ed by the following changee 3, fi teps, cautions, or notes: ,
6 5
.s b yN _
AL , . . . _
- , ^
^
PGP Page: 30 Attachment 2 (Cont.) PEI Verification Plan Attachment 2 (Cont.) Area Reference
- 1) elimination
- 2) addition
- 3) sequence
- 4) alteration I
- c. Are correct, plant-specific adaptions VEG 3.3.2 incorporated per PSTG:
- 1) systems
- 2) instrumentation
- 3) limits
- 4) controls
- 5) indications
- d. Have licensing commitments applicable VEG 3.3.2 to PEIs been addressed?
- e. Are differences between the licensing VEG 3.3.2 commitments and the PEIs or PSTG documented?
- 3. Quantitative Information
- a. Do the quantitative values, including VEG 3.3.3 tolerance bands, used in the PEI comply with applicable PEI source documents?
- b. Where EPG values are not used in the VEG 3.3.3 PEI, are the PEI values computed
. accurately?
- c. When calculations are required by VEG 3.3.3 the PEI, are equations presented with sufficient information for operator use?
- 4. Plant Hardware Information 3
- a. Is the following plant hardware VEG3.f.4 specified in the PEI available for operator use:
- 1) . equipment
- 2) controls
- 3) indicators
- 4) instrumentation
PGP Page: 31 Attachment 2 (Cont.) PEI Verificat. ion Plan Attachment 3 - !AST Discrepancy Sheet: Number PEI: Rev.: Step Number: Discrepancy: Evaluator: Date: _ Resolution: Supervisor: Date: Approved: YES NO (circle one) Operations Section General Supervisor: Date: Resolution Incorporated.By: Date:
PGP Page: 32 Attachment 3 PEI Validation Plan PEI Validation Plan 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this plan is to guide the administrative process used in the validation of the Plant Emergency Instructions (PEls) and to assign responsibilities for the process.
' ~
2.0 SCOPE This plan identifies the aspects of the validation program process and' gives guidance that encompasses both validation methods walk-through and simulator. Specific guidance for each method is pre-sented in its appropriate checklists (See Attachments 1 and 2). 3.0 RESPONSIBILITY 3.1 The Manager, Perry Plant Operations Department shall approve all PEIs and revisions af ter recommendation for approval by PORC. 3.2 The Operations Section General Supervisor (GSO) shall be responsible for the following: 3.2.1 Managing the validation program and ensuring its smooth coor- .
; dination with the training program.
-3.2.2 Determining if validation is.needed and its scope.
. 3.2.3 Selecting the validation method or methods.
3.2.4 Appointing and training an observer / reviewer team.
- 1. . . Three persons for the simulator validation method (three- ,
on-crew).
- 2. One person per operator for the walk-through validation method . (one-on-one) . -
3.2.5 Completing applicable portions of the PEI Validation Form, Attachment 4. f
- 3.2.6 ' ' Arranging for. rotating operator crews through the training /
validation sessions. 3.2.7
~
Scheduling simulator training' time for validation purposes as
- appropriate. , ,
s I, y ,,_ , ...%.v- ----,,m.e+--e e- ,m , e ,,,,.
~,.eg,,,--.4-. ,. . . - , , .,,,.w ,e,---.e,.re,.--.-,4-..w .vwm,.
PGP Page: 33
~
Attachment 3 (Cont.) PEI Validation Plan 3.2.8 Reviewing discrepancies and resolutions forwarded by observer / review personnel. 3.2.9 Ensuring that all revisions are reviewed by the NDAS Ruman Factors Unit. 3.2.10 Forwarding recommended resolutions and procedure changes for approval.
4.0 REFERENCES
4.1 INPO Guideline 83-006, Emergency Operating Procedures Validation Guideline. 4.2 BWR Owners Group Emergency Procedures Guidelines, Revision 3. 4.3 Results of PEI verification. 4.4 OAP-0507, Preparation of Plant Emergency Instructions. 5.0 DEFINITIONS See Reference 4.4. 6.0 DETAILS 6.1 Program Description When developing this PEI validation program, the following major items were considered:
- 1. How PEI validation will be performed.
- 2. How to appropriately use simulators or walk-throughs for validation.
- 3. How operating and training experience will be integrated into the program evaluation.
- 4. The evaluation criteria to be applied and the methods to be followed in resolving discrepancies.
l- 5. . How completion of the PEI validation process will be docu-l mented. 9 - # ,. n - , , r. _ - _ -.. - , _ _ __y_.-. , - m.y ,_ . - . , ,.c .m - . .-
1 PGP Page: 34 Attachment 3 (Cont.) PEI Validation Plan The program is based on the industry document Emergency Operating "rocedures Validation Guideline (INPO 83-006). This plan addresses the following objectives:
- 1. PEIs are usable, i.e. , they can be understood and followed without confusion, delays, and errors.
- 2. A correspondence exists between the instructions and the Control Room / plant hardware.
- 3. The instructions presented in the PEIs are compatible with the shif t staffing, qualifications, training, and experience of the operating staff.
- 4. A high level of assurance exists that the instructions will work, i.e., the instructions guide the operator in mitigating transients and accidents.
Regardless of the method, the PEI validation process can be des-cribed by the three phases of: preparation, assessment, and resolu-tion. .6.1.1 Preparation Each validation method will use the applicable evaluation cri-teria presented in Table 1, and the scenario to be used.will be recorded on the appropriate scenario form:
- 1. Walk-Through Scenario Form, (Attachment 1, Sheet e).
- 2. Shnulator Scenario Form, (Attachment 2 Sheet d) .
Further specific guidance in preparation for each validation method is presented in the checklist for the validation method (Attach-ments 1 and 2) . 6.1.2 Assessment Specific guidance for assessment using each validation method is presented on the checklist for each validation method (Attachments 1 and 2). 6.1.3 Resolution Resolution will be accomplished by reviewing diseprepancies and comments presented on the Discrepancy Sheet, (Attachment 4). The observer / reviewer will propose solutions, if needed, and forward to the Operations Section General Supervisor for approval, with the other designated documentation.
PGP Page: 35 Attachment 3 (Cont.) PEI Validation Plan 6.2 Documentation The documented items needed to provide a history of the validation program are specified on each validation method checklist (Attach-ments 1 and 2). These items will be maintained as a validation package in the document control storage area. 7.0 ATTACHMENTS 7.1 Attachment 1 - Checklist for Walk-Through Method of Validation. 7.2 Attachment 2 - Checklist for Simulator Method of Validation. . 7.3 Attachment 3 - PEI Validation Form.
- 7.4 Attachment 4 - Discrepancy Sheet.
7.5 Attachment 5 - Table 1, Evaluati.>n Criteria. l l i' l. L
t PGP Page: 36 Attachment 3 (Cont.) PEI Validation Plan Attachment 1 Sheet a Checklist for Walk-Through Method of Validation 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this checklist is to provide guidance for the walk-through method of validating PEIs. 2.0 VALIDATION PROCESS
- PEI validation will be conducted in three parts: preparation, assessment, and resolution. ,
2.1 Preparation
- The designated observer / reviewer will be responsible for the following:
- 1. Using and completing the PEI Validation Form (Attachment 1) .
- 2. Reviewing the scope of the validation designated by the Operations Supervisor or his representative.
' 3. Developing or modifying scenarios to support the scope of validation and filling out the Walk-Through Scenario Form (Attachment 2) .
- 4. Modifying / selecting the developed evaluation criteria to support the scope of validation.
- 5. Selecting operators that are representative of the training level expected of all the operators.
- 6. Scheduling the needed resources for walk-througn.
- a. observer /reviewar(s)
- b. operator (s) involved
- c. control room or control room simulator
- d. set of PEIs and support instructions 2.2 ' Asses saant The designated observer / reviewer will perform the following duties:
- 1. Brief the operator on the scope of validation and how the assessment will be ccaducted.
l ~ 1 E 3 9 , - . -d, .s ...._ .-w-.- , c. 4 m > - - . * , , . . - ~ , ., - , _ - , - , , - - - . - - - < - - - . .-wr-- , - - ,,-m---c -- - - . , - - - - - . - < - -
PGP Page: 37 Attachment 3 (Cont.) PEI Validation Plan Attachment 1 (Cont.) Sheet b
- 2. Follow the developed or modified scenario by first giving the plant initial conditions and then give the changing plant parameters while walking through the instructions.
- 3. Stop the walk-through assessment for discussion of any iden-tified discrepancies.
- 4. Conduct a debriefing with the operators as soon as possible af ter each walk-through assessment, using the following sequence:
- a. Brief the participants on the purpose and objectives for debriefing.
- b. Have operators present problems and discrepancies which they had identified during assessment.
- c. Have operators provide possible reasons for problems,
- d. Present other problems and discrepancies identified during assessment.
- e. Have operators describe possible reasons for the other problems.
- f. Summarize the findings of the debriefing for the opera-tors.
- 5. Record discrepancies and comments on Attachment 4.
, 2.3 Resolution I: The designated observer / reviewer will perform the following duties: 1.- Review comments and discrepancies.
- 2. Propose resolutions for the Operations Section General Super-Visor.
l-
- 3. Submit the validation package to the Operations Section General Superviso r.
' The Operations Section General Supervisor will perfona the following duties:
- 1. Review proposed resolutions with appropriate staff.
- 2. Select resolutions for incorporation in the PEIs.
. 3. Present-the revised PEIs for review and approval.
O
PGP Page: 38 Attachment 3 (Cont.) PEI Validation Plan Attachment 1 (Cont.) Sheet c 3.0 DOCUMENTATION The following documentation will be submitted as a validation package.
- 1. Completed PEI Validation Forms (Attachment 3).
- 2. Completed Discrepancy Sheets (Attachment 4) .
- 3. Completed Walk-Through Scenario Forms (Attachment 1, Sheet d) .
- 4. Evaluation Criteria used.
- 5. PEIs used for the validation.
i. e w -. re. -en.-- 2, - , --. .-,., -- , ---- ,- ~.- y. v.-,- ,- p m y s--%,, , - , - - - -v--eev.,v-,--eww-*-m-+--,-, . - - - . 3 --w----- . - - -
- . .- - . . . _ - - _ ~ . - - .
PGP Page: 39 Attachment 3 (Cont.) PEI Validation Plan Attachment 1 (Cont.) Sheet d Walk-Through Scenario Form PEI-I'
Title:
Date:
Purpose:
Scenario
Description:
Initial Plant Conditions: i Plant Parameter / Instruction Step Symptom to Transition To Description Cause Transition (Instruction, Step) L i. i . l
. . _ . _ _ _ _ ~ . . _ , , . , ,,- . , _ . _ _ . _ _ _ . . , , _ . . . - _ _ , . _ , , . . . . , . . . _ _ . . , _ _ . . . . . _ ,
PGP Page: 40 Attachment 3 (Cont.) PEI Validation Plan Attachment 2 Sheet a Checklist for Simulator Method of Validation 1.0 PURPOSE l The purpose of this checklist is to provide guidance for the simu-lator method of validating PEIs.
- 2.0 VALIDATION PROCESS
- PEI validation will be conducted in three parts: preparation, assessment, and resolution.
2.1 Preparation The designated observer / reviewer team will be responsible for the following:
- 1. Using and completing the PEI Validation Form (Attachment 3) .
- 2. Reviewing the scope of the validatica as directed by the Operations Section General Supervisor or his representative.
- 3. Developing or modifying scenario runs to support the scope of validation.
- 4. Completing the upper portion of the Simulator Scenario Form (Attachment 2, Sheet d) and forwarding to the simulator supervisor.
- 5. Developing data collection techniques.
- 6. Evaluating plant-to-simulator characteristics.
- 7. Making the required adjustments to the PEI set to use on the simulato r.
- 8. Selecting and scheduling the operating crews.
- 9. Modifying / selecting the evaluation criteria to support the scope of validation.
- 10. Selecting operators that are trained to the level expected of all the operators.
- 11. Ensuring the PEIs and supporting procedures are available.
4 e ., ,.~e-r -,s .,-e -,.s,--., ,.n.,~+, .ww-.- -c,,.~ .,, ...,-wa,w-,,--e,.,,,-n_--~-,--,,-a,-,-,-,-w--en--,--.-n,--r-n...,
h PGP Page: 41 Attachment 3 (Cont.) PEI Validation Plan Attachment 2 (Cont.) Sheet b 2.2 Asses sment The designated observer / reviewer team will perform the following duties:
- 1. Brief the operating crew on the scope of the validation and how the assessment will be conducted.
- 2. Ensure the observer / reviewer team does not interfere or inter-act with the operating crew.
- 3. Brief the operating crew on initial plant conditions for each scenario run.
- 4. Conduct a debriefing with the operators as soon as possible af ter each scenario run using the following sequence:
1. l a. Brief the participants on the purpose and objectives for debriefing.
- b. Have operators present problems and discrepancies which they had identified during assessment.
- c. Have operators provide possible reasons for problems. ..
l d. Present other problems and discrepancies identified during assessment.
- e. Have operators describe possible reasons for the other problems.
- f. Summarize the findings of the debriefing for the operators.
- 5. Record discrepancies and comments on Attachment 4.
2.3 Resolution The designated observer / reviewer team will perform the following duties:
- 1. Review comments and discrepancies.
- 2. Propose resolutions on Attachment 4 to the GSO.
l 3. Submit the validation package to the GSO. t l- The GSO will perform the following duties:
- 1. Review proposed resolutions with appropriate staff.
- 2. Select resolutions for incorporation in the PEIs.
l
- 3. Present the revised PEIs for review and approval.
t
PGP Page: 42 Attachment 3 (Cont.) PEI Validation Plan Attachment 2 (Cont.) Sheet c 3.0 DOCUMENTATION The following documentation will be submitted with the validation package:
- 1. Completed PEI Validation Forms (Attachment 3) .
- 2. Completed Discrepancy Sheets (Attachment 4).
- 3. Completed Simulator Scenario Forms (Attachment 2, Sheet d) .
- 4. Evaluation criteria used.
- 5. PEIs used for the validation.
- 6. Data on plant-to-simulator characteristics.
O
PGP Page: 43 Attachment 3 (Cont.) PEI Validation Plan Attachment 2 (Cont.) Sheet d Simulator Scenario Form PEI- Revision: .T1 tie: Date:
Purpose:
Scenario
Description:
Initial Plant Conditions: Simulator Sequence (to be completed by the simulator supervisor): EVENT TIME MALFUNCTION NO. HR: MIN:SEC I/O OVERRIDE DESCRIPTION INTENT
. . , - . , - - - , , . , - , _ . , - . . - - , _ . - _ - , . ._ . ,, ._ ...--._, - - .. . c, _ _ , . - - _ . - - , . . - - - - _ , - , - ,
PGP Page: 44 Attachment 3 (Cont.) PEI Validation Plan Attachment 3 PEI Validation Form Page of PEI- Revision: PEI
Title:
Scope of Validation:- Validation Method of Methods to be Used: Designated Observe r/ Reviewer (s): Preparation Completed on: By: Assessment
- Completed on: By:
Operator (s) Involved: Qualification s (SRO, RO, Other) Resolution Completed on: By:
. Documentation Package
- Forwarded on: By:
2 g .. L.
PGP Page: 45 Attachment 3 (Cont.) PEI Validation Plan Attachment 4 Discrepancy Sheet: Numbe r PEI- Revision: Step Number:
~ Discrepancy:
M Evaluator: Date: Resolution Supervisor: Date: Approved: YES NO. (circle one) Operations Section General Supervisor Date: Resolution Incorporated By: Date: O
_l 1 l PGP Page: 46 Attachment 3 (Cont.) PEI Validation Plan f Attachment 5 Table 1 Evaluation Criteria Legend: X - applicable to the validation method 0 - not applicable to the validation method W-T - valk-through validation method
- -- . S - simulator validation method Applicable to: I. USABILITY W-T S A. LEVEL OF DETAIL X X 1. It there sufficient information to perform the specified actions at each step?
X X 2. Are the alternatives adequately described at each decision point? I X 3. Are the labeling, abbreviations, and location information as provided in the PEI sufficient to enable the operator to find the needed equipment?
~
hi X 4. Is the PEI adssing information needed to manage the emergency condition? X X 5. Are the contingency actions suf ficient to address the symptoms? N X- X 6. Are the titles and numbers sufficiently descriptive to enable the operator to find referenced and branched instruc-tions? B. UNDERSTANDABILITY X X 1. Is the PEI easy to read? X X 2. Are the figures and tables easy to read with accuracy? X X 3. Can the values on figures and charts
. be easily determined?
X X 4. Are CAUTION and NOTE statements readily understandable?
PGP Page: 47 Attachment 3 (Cont.) PEI Validation Plan Attachment 5 (Cont.) Applicable to: W-T S X X 5. Are the PEI steps readily under-standable? II. OPERATIONAL CORRECTNESS A. PLANT COMPATIBILITY X X 1. Can the actions specified in the in-instruction be performed in the designated sequence? X X 2. Are there alternate success paths that are not included in the PEls? X X 3. Can the information from the plant instrusentation be obtained as specified by the PEI? O X 4. Are the plant symptoms specified by the PEI adequate to enable the operator to select the applicable PEI? 0 X 5. Are the PEI entry conditions appro-priate for the plant symptoms dis-played to the operator? X X 6. Is inforantion or equipment not specified in the PEI required to accomplish the task? O X 7. Do the plant responses agree with the PEI basis? X X 8. Are the instrusent readings and. tolerances stated in the PEI con-sistent with the instrument values displayed on the instruments? X X 9. Is the REI physically compatible with the work situation (too bulky to hold, binding would not allow them to lay flat in work space, no place to lay the PEIs down to use)? E X 0 10. Are the instrument readings and tolerances specified by the PEI for remotely located instruments accurate? t
PGP Page: 48 Attachment 3 (Cont.) PEI Validation Plan Attachment 5 (Cont.) - LAST Applicable to: W-T S B. OPERATOR COMPATIBILITY X X 1. If time intervals are specified, can the action steps be performed on the plant within or at the designated time intervals? X X 2. Can the action steps be performed by the operating shift? X X 3. If specific actions are assigned to individual shif t personnel, does the PEI adequately aid in the coordina-tion of actions among shift personnel where necessary? X X 4. Can the operating shift follow the designated action step sequences? X X 5. Can the particular steps or sets of steps be readily located when required? ' X X 6. Can the exit point be returned to without omitting steps when required? X X 7. Can instruction branches be entered at the correct point? X X 8. Are PEI exit points specified adequately?
PGP Page: 49 Attachment 4 PEI Training Plan REI Training Plan 1.0 PURPOSE To provide a description of the program for providing training on the Plant Emergency Instructions (PEIs) . 2.0 SCOPE This document will: describe the training objectives and the methods used to accomplish those objectives; describe the plan for addressing revisions to PEIs in the training program; and identify the techniques for evaluating the training to ensure the objectives are being met. This document will not provide all the details of the entire training program; that information is available in other documents available from the Perry Training Section. 3.0 RESPONSIBILITY 3.1 The Perry Training Section General Supervisor shall ensure that the objectives of this document are met both for initial and re-qualification training programs and for the initial PEIs and future revisions. 3.2 The Operations Section General Supervisor shall ensure that per-sonnel are available to receive the training described by this plan.
4.0 REFERENCES
4.1 Letter, Youngblood (NRC) to Edelman (CEI), 5/6/83. 5.0 DEFINITIONS None . 6.0 DETAILS 6.1 Training Objectives and Methods 6.1.1 Students must understand the technical bases for the PEIs. Lesson plans have been developed for presentation in a lecture
.,,r - - , ., --~ ~ - - - -- -a.
. .. -- - . .-= - .- - - __ - - .
PGP Page: 50 Attachment 4 (Cont.) !: PEI Training Plan - LAST serie s. This will be supplemented by discussions conducted during simulator exercises. Since the objective is one of obtaining an understanding of background material, it is best met by interactive means, i.e. , lectures, questions and answers, and discussions. 1 6.1.2 Students must have a working knowledge of the technical con-tent of the PEIs. This will require an integration of several ' methods. The "what" of the technical content can be imparted by lectures and self-study, but the "how" of the integrated use of the PEIs can best be developed by control room walk-through and simulator exercises which actually require the student to utilize the PEIs. Due to the need to execute several steps concurrently and the technique of branching, only
- . by actual utilization can the student meet the objective.
6.1.3 Students must understand the philosophy of symptom oriented emergency instructions. A discussion of event oriented g verses symptom oriented instructions will be covered in the initial lecture on PEIs. As with Section 6.1.1, the nature of the material best lends itself to the lecture method. 6.1.4 Students must be capable of executing the PEIs under opera-tional conditions. This objective will be met principally through the use of simulator exercises, although control room walk-throughs may be used to augment this. Small groups
.(approximately the normal shif t complement) under the direction
+ of the instructor will respond to accident scenarios on the simulator. 6.2 PEI Revisions ' Minor revisions (those that are editorial in nature) will normally be covered through required reading, briefings, or lectures. Major revisions (those that affect intent or significantly affect the sequence of actions) will be evaluated and will be addressed using the appropriate methods described in Section 6.1. Normally, major revisions will be covered initially through required reading, with supplemental simulator / walk-through exercises ' conducted in requali-fication training as required. .. 6.3 Evaluation Methods It is difficult to pre-determine which evaluation methods will be used for each objective. The techniques of evaluation will be appropriate for the type of learning to be measured. In general though, material covered by lectures should be evaluated by written tests, whereas performance on a simulator could be evaluated by observation using perforsance checklists. 7.0 ATTACHNENTS None
PGP Page: 51 Attachment 5 Perry Specific Tech. Guidelines Develop-ment Methodology Perry Specific Technical Guidelines Development Methodology 1.0 PURPOSE To describe the methodology to be used in converting the generic Emergency Procedure Guidelines (EPGs) Revision 3 developed by the BWR Owner's Group into the Perry Specific Technical Guidelines (PSTGs) . 2.0 SCOPE This document will address the means used to document and justify any deviations between the EPGs, and the PSTGs. For the purposes of this document, any plant specific information, setpoint, or calcula-tion will be considered a deviation. The intent of this is to pro-vide documentation for these types of information. 3.0 RESPONSIBILITY 3.1 The Operations Section General Supervisor (GS0) will assign an Evaluator and approve all Deviation Sheets. 3.2 The Nuclear Design and Analysis Section Lead Engineer will approve all setpoints, calculations, and design information (except as noted in 6.2.4) .
4.0 REFERENCES
None 5.0 DEFINITIONS None 6.0 DETAILS 6.1 An individual (Evaluator) assigned by the GSO will prepare the PSIG based on Revision 3 of the EPGs. For each deviation from the EPGs, whether it is caused by incorporating plant specific information or -
PGP Page: 52 Attachment 5 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech. Guidelines Develop-ment Methodology to correct a deficiency in the EPG itself, a Deviation Sheet (Attachment 1) will be prepared by the Evaluator. If a deviation appears in more than one step, this fact will be noted on the Deviation Sheet - separate sheets will not be prepared. 6.2 Examples of Deviations include:
- 1. Setpoint Example: Drywell high pressure scram at 1.68 psig.
- 2. Calculation Example: Cold shutdown boron weight is 753 pounds.
- 3. EPG Deficiency Example: RC/Q does not address Alternate Rod Insertion.
- 4. Design Information Example: SRV re-opening pressure for Dikkers valves is O psig.
(However, the fact that Perry does not have a HPCI system does not require NDAS verification) . However, renumbering of steps or changes resulting from renumbering of steps are not Deviations. 6.3 If the deviation is the result of requiring design information, a setpoint, or a calculation, the Deviation Sheet will be forwarded to the NDAS Lead Engineer who will assign it to a responsible engineer for review. 6.3.1 The Reviewer will provide a justification for the deviation. This may either be done in the assigned space or by referencing another document. 6.3.2 The Reviewer will return the Deviation Sheet to the NDAS Lead Engineer who will approve or reject it. If approved it will be forwarded to the GSO for review and approval per Step 6.5. If rejected it will be returned to the Reviewer with comments. Once a satisfactory justification is provided, it will be approved and forwarded. 6.4 If the deviation is not the result of requiring design information, a setpoint, or a calculation, the Evaluator will send the Deviation Sheet to a Reviewer designated by the GSO. r
PGP Page: 53 Attachment 5 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech. Guidelines Develop-ment Methodology 6.4.1 Af ter preparing a justification, the Reviewer will circle N/R (Not Required) above the NDAS Lead Engineer's signature line and forwerd it to the GSO for review and approved per Step 6.5. 6.5 The GSO will review and approve the Deviation Sheet. If not ap-
, proved, it will be returned with consents to the Reviewer (through
- the NDAS Lead Engineer if appropriate) for revision. Steps 6.3 or 6.4 will be repeated until a satisfactory justification is supplied.
6.6 Af ter approval by the GSO, the Deviation Sheet will be returned to the person responsible for preparing the PSTG. Once incorporated in the PSTG, it will be signed off and maintained for incorporation in the PGP as Attacheent 7. 7.0' ATTACHMENTS 7.1 Attachment 1 - Deviation Sheet. O
PGP Page: 54
~4 Attachment 5 (Cont.)
Perry Specific Tech. Guidelines Develop-ment Methodology Attachment 1 - LAST Deviation Sheet: Numbe r EPG Step Number (s): PSGT Step Number (s): Deviation: k' Evaluator: Date: Justification: t 1 Reviewer: Date: Approved: YES NO N/R , (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineers Date:
~ Approved: YES NO (circle one) 1.
GSO: Date:
' Incorporated:- Date:
.- t
w
?
PGP
-Page: 55 Attachment 6
.< Perry Specific Tech-4i nical Guidelines Perry Specific Technical Guidelines c-4 y
t _ s k
-i
'i e
T
)
s
' 6 :-
f d' - ,? 9 T i j ' t e,
PGP Page: 56 Attachment 6 (Cened Perry Specific ch-nical Guidelines Table of Contents 9
.P, age Table I PSTG Abbreviations 57 Table II Operator Precautions 58 RPV Control Guidelines 66 Primary Containment Control Guidelines 76 Secondary Containment Control Guideline Deleted Radioactivity Release Control Guideline 89 Contingency 1 - Level Restoration 90 2- Emergency RPV Depressurization 93 3- Steam Cooling 94 4- Core Cooling Without Level Restoration 95 5- Alternate Shutdown Cooling Deleted 6 - RPV Flooding 97 7 - Level / Power Control 104
- t. ,
'I e
l' L
g. f PGP Page: 57 Attachment 6 (Cont.)
,. Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines i TABLE 1 c
PSTG ABBREVIATIONS ADS - Automatic Depressurization System o APRM - Average Power Range Monitor CRD - Control Rod Drive ECCS - Emergency Core Cooling System hcl [ - Hydre slic Control Unit HPCS - High Pressure Core Spray HVAC - Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning LCO - Limiting Condition for Operation LOCA - Ioss of Coolant Accident LPCI - Low Pressure Coolant Injection LPCS - Low Pressure Core Spray MSIV - Main Steamline Isolation Valves NDTT - Nil-Ductility Transition Temperature NPSH - Net Positive Suction Head RCIC - Reactor. Core Isolation Cooling
. RCIS -
Rod Control and Information System 3 , RHR - ) Residual Heat Removal RPS -
.. i Reactor Protection System RPV -
' Reactor Pree'aure Vessel y
RWCll. - Reactor Water Cleanup
- b
-+ SIC s 7,- Standby Liquid Control
- g
[, E OiD SORY , . - Stuck Open' Relief Valve v SPMS - Suppression Pool Makeup Sy, stem ,*- SRV - Safety ReliefgValvd' - N ,
+
. \'
2
$ y k
\ ' .
..t '__ __ . , . _ __ -.. . . , _ . _ . . . _ . . , _ . _ , _ - _ _ . _ _ . _
PGP Page: 58 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines TABLE 2 OPERATOR PRECAUTIONS GENERAL , This section lists " Cautions" which are generally applicable at all times. CAUTION 1
.. Monitor the general state of the plant. If an entry condition 2
for a Plant Emergency Instruction occurs, enter that instruction. l Wen it is determined that an emergency no longer exists, enter the appropriate Integrated operating Instruction. CAUTION 2 Monitor RPV water level and pressure and primary containment temperatures and pressure from multiple indications. CAUTION 3 If a safety function initiates automatically, assume a true !~ initiating event has occurred unless otherwise confirmed by at I- least two independent indicat. ions. L i CAUTION 4 menever RER is in the LPCI mode, inject through the heat ex-changers as soon as possible. CAUTION 5 (. Suppression pool average temperature .is determined by. SVI-G43-T1213. Dryvell average temperature is determined by.SVI-M14-T1211. Con-tainment average temperature is determined by SVI-T23-T1205. L . t'
PGP Page: 59 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines , CAUTION 6 (Later) O 9 [.'-
PGP Page: 60 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines CAUTION 7 (NA) CAUTION 8 Observe NPSH requirements for puups taking suction from the suppression pool (Figure 1). 4 4
J PGP
, Page: 61 Attachment 6 (Cont.)
Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines CAUTION 9 If signals of high suppression pool water level 18 f t. 4.9 in. (high level suction interlock) or low condensate storage tank unter level 34,300 gal. (low level suction interlock) occur, confirm automatic transfer of or manually transfer HPCS and RCIC suction from the condensate storage tank to the suppression pool. SPECIFIC This section lists " Cautions" which are applicable at one or more specific points within the guidelines. Where a " Caution" is applicable, enclosed in a box. Example: f15"] CAUTION 10 Do not secure or place an ECCS in MANUAL mode unless, by at least two independent indications, (1) misoperation in AUTOMATIC mode is confirmed, or (2) adequate core cooling is assured. If an ECCS is placed in MANUAL mode, it will not initiate automatically. CAUTION 11 If a high drywell pressure ECCS initiation signal 1.68 psig (drywell pressure which initiates ECCS) occurs or exists while depressurizing, prevent injection from those LPCS and LPCI pumps not required to assure adequate core cooling prior to
-reaching their maximum injection pressures.
CAUTION 12 )a Do not throttle RCIC turbine below 2000 rpm (minimum turbine speed limit per turbine vendor manual) . CAUTION 13 Cooldown rates above 100'F/hr may be required to accomplish this step. e t erw=, a y,y,, , ,,m, --,,#.aw -,+-,w- ,e ~...-w,, ,-r- .,i-----, -,.-
--,,,,w--, . -e-,-w,e,.-,-----,-.-*.-ww.,,- ,.m<-
PGP Page: 62 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines CAUTION 14 Do not depressurize the RPV below 60 psig (RCIC low pressure isolation setpoint), unless motor driven pumps suf ficient to maintain RPV water level are running and available for injection. i~ CAUTION 15 Open SRVs in the following sequence if possible: B21-F051D, 478, 47F, 41G, SIB, 41D, 51A, 47C, 41K, 47G, 41C, 47D, 51G, 41B, 41E, 41F, 41A, SIC, 47H. CAUTION 16 _ Bypassing low RPV water level MSIV isolation interlocks may be a required:to accomplish this step. CAUTION 17 Cooldown rates above 100*F/hr may be required to conserve RPV water inventory, protect primary containment integrity, or limit radioactive release to the environment. CAUTION 18 .- t If continuous LPCI operation of any RHR pump is required to assure adequate core cooling, do not divert that pump from the LPCI mode. CAUTION 19 Confirm automatic trip or manually trip SIC pumps at 0% (low
-level trip) in the SIE tank.
PGP Page: 63 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines CAUTION 20 Defeating RCIS interlocks may be required to accomplish this step. i _. CAUTION 21 I Elevated containment pressure may trip the RCIC turbine on high exhaust pressure. CAUTION 22 Defeating isolation interlocks may be required to accomplish this step. t CAUTION 23 r (N/A) i I -CAUTION 24
- (N/A) t i.
l l Li- CAUTION 25 I.
' A rapid increase in injection into the RPV may induce a large j- power excursion and result in substantial core damage.
l l. ! CAUTION 26 L l Large reactor power oscillations may be observed while executing
~
this step.
550s . 3 1 500- - 1 i 450- - < n RPV SATURATION TEMPERATURE VS. SATURATION PRESSURE
~
k W3 O v w ! !! 400.. . H i Y
~
$! 9 w c 1
b s.. . . O Q 2 350__
- e .
g u m t 6
< 5c i'
m n
- o a I ;
S! 1 300 . 1 5 i i om ra
>mm nmo 1 on n oe m n
.: 250 ~
.=
- 4 om -
3 om E
; c 'u mm re o, s-
- o. o e i mM w n> m 4, MM oo e
m 1 n 200 m >4 0 l 1 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 ' 1100 y i
- RPV Pre.ssure (psig) l . '
PGP Page: 65 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines
; 6 i t i nnf i ei- e i t . : i i 16 i l i , i l i i. ! .
F i i i i i il i i i ii i ie i i N.,4 4 nA hl Adm +i i e ii i I
,t
. I i 6 - , i e i e i e i i i i- i i il ~7. i i i . It i i 6 I i 4 4 I lt t , t I i i i i i t i Iiei t : iiiI i i i '
, t i i 1 . Iii 6 i i i ! i t i i tii Avu. inrdni i i i ! i t t i i e i i i i i - i i t i . t i i i i I e j i i i i i ; i 6 i e i..i ' i i i i i i i e i i, * * *
- i i i t t ,
i i i ei eiei e'ii! i i , i j i i t i i i e i i* i i e i : i f 4 i ) i i s i i i i i ie4 i i e e i i e a i i e i i t t e t iiiii? . i e t i 1 ei i i i l t i t
- ii t I ll ' i 'l i l l lie siel l l i l i l 1 i l i t i i N i t i l I '
I t l 4 t i e i t i i i { i i I ' O '
- i i ti , ,
t ati s i i - l i s t i til i 14 : To - i , J. i i i. i a ie i ai i - t e
*t i i i e i 6 i : i i i . . , ,
a i e i 4 e i e i , e i aie ii e i i i _r i i t i i i i t l : l i ll it i i t i e l i 2 i W ..
! i ! i i _,.f ' t _1. .L.L _t. ..I i
- 1. . t L .6.: i e i 4 4 2 > I ' .
i i i i i / 6Ii 4/ I i t i 1/. i ' t .iLt L_/ i i i i, i 6 - - e a i ai if i1 1/i ii e i / i i e/1 l : i i e i i i i e i i t i l s/ I /i i i i i / i i of i i I 6 i i.e i i . 5 i eii of i i ifi! I e.t /siii i i i/e i i i e ' t
- t i
, i iii / i i e/: eieais/ i t i ei i a e/. t i i i :
- n i i o i ei it i / i i t /i 1 e if~i t i i ei I/Iiiit i i ioiiiii& , -
eii66 i I I- t I/ i i/t i !I i '/ 6I i i t i i 9 0 mii: o. - I t t i 11-
-1 il 6 i i /-
e i t/l 6 s /. eiie ie r/ t i : t iti i t/
/i I i i i i iei i I 66 I 6 i i '
Q'g _ L ;_ mg i i It i i i
/ / i 6 i 6 i t /i eiie6 i t i ve I_y I, e i 6 / I i t i i /s i t i i 6 i 6 t 'Iig i o
! I t t I s/: i 6ei i / i e i i i tI: e I i 6 .w i a a > *
, 6 i- i t i i+1 i i /
6.. t t i t s /: i ii i i e 4 i ie i . f 5 i -i ii: ! iae ,fe i eii/ii! I e i e i '/
- i i i i ei l i i i i o DM
- a
- e. i !ti/ i e i ,i > i I /ie6 eii i iiii i
_L.e_ o i.07 .j-E i i i 6 ,1 i { t i i if ij,6 e ! i l i i i i l i e 1 l [- i i t i ii 6 6 f a:
- i < .e '
- i e e . t f, e' i i + i f. i t e i* I i s
- o-a-Z-a.c3
- A I f '
I i ' I t 6 iie i * . i ei t i if
- i i l 4 4 i i i ! t a g O O t at
- i t i ! i i l i i ! i a i ! t ll 4 e i t i e i i 6. ( ! !
- 5 t ,] 'Q
! ) : f
- t6 . i l i l I l i l l t i ? fif i i f $ 1 ll l : I i e 8 b M 44 t i t i e i e i i e t 1 i a i . l i f f ii s ' e i i . a a 1 a '"
1 I I i t i i ! l l 4 4 4 i t i6 eiif f i i l i 4 l ' i ei e4 ' ' i ' i i i i i l i i e i j ( i j t i i t i ! ) ' i i i i eiiil i ei t i i i i ii,
. 4 i '
i i i i I i i t i * ' 4 I i t. i i i e i i 6 i i if i f 8 ! ' t
- LL i f ( ) i i j, f a .e d . = j-+.e 4 > + - w.,.4l. W oe.i ,-p.i. i e f--j ~ ' ' ' ' ' ^
O i l i i8' i !$ 1 l t ' I@ a i i i 1 i$ i l l 1 ii eil i i I 'iQ '
'T v
i e l l t i g" , , a I t I t i I !
- f i e 6 . t & 1 } i e i. t t i t a w 9 .%.
C . i . I e ,
' il j i e i !
- i . i , t 6 ' i i
- l 6 *
- i '
a l' 6
< l '
t it i 6 I t a ' Ii i ' I i ! l l 6 : ' i ' l
- i l l
- t 8 + 4 i e <+ . e i e i . i e i .. i i
- . . . = = . . . . ' .
t i i 4 , I i e i i e + + i t i i e aie i e aii, t
, i i a e 4 i i ! i
- i i t i %e i } t. i y . , i i. a t 6
> i 4e , i
- Ot i i l ' '
I i l i i i j 1 1 ! !
- I '
,. g,, .
M i - N o _ . .. i , s. is.
,Y, ' ' -I ti 8 q %
l ? i I' s
> i i ,
. i .
, i i - , i .
t 4 it > -
. . . I i 8 i v .t - - -
~~(W)I3W11W3dW31 '100'dINotSS3 M Y1SL._ri
; 6eii>,I i t i
F i ii t - . , i i i i I . t i i i~i . i i e i , e . . . i ! i i i i i r , 6 i I 6 i , , i
- t l ?6 *14 t a f 5 i e i i # i i i I i l
- i e i a * < 6e i i i i : I - . > e i_ '"_
p . d. d - .. 8 3- '
PGP Page: 66 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines RPV CONTROL GUIDELINE PURPOSE The purpose of this guideline is to:
- 1. Nhintain adequate core cooling,
- 2. Shut down the reactor, and
- 3. Cool down the RPV to cold shutdown conditions (70*F 4 RPV water t empera ture 4 200*F) . (cold shutdown conditions)
ENTRY CONDITIONS The entry conditions for this guideline are any of the following:
- 1. RPV water level below 177.7 in. (low level scram setpoint).
- 2. RPV pressure above 1064.7 psig (high RPV pressure scram setpoint) .
- 3. Drywell pressure above 1.68 psig (high drywell pressure scram set-point) .
- 4. A condition which requires reactor scram, and reactor power above 5% (APRM downscale trip) or cannot be determined.
'5. A condition which requires MSIV isolation. OPERATOR ACTIONS RC-1 If reactor scram has not been initiated, initiate reactor scram. Irrespective of the entry conditions, execute Steps RC/L, RC/P, and RC/Q concurrently. RC/L Monitor and control RPV water . level. RC/L-1 Icitiate each of the following which should have initiated but did not:
- a. ' Isolation b.- ECCS
'c. Standby diesel generators
- d. HPCS diesel generator
F. PGP Page: 67 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines If while executing the following step:
- a. Boron injection is required or boron has been injected into the RPV, enter the instruction developed from CON-TINGENCY 7.
- b. RPV water level cannot be determined. RPV FLOODING IS REQUIRED; enter the instruction develocc.d from CON-TINGENCY 6.
l c. RPV Flooding is required, enter the instruction developed from CONTINGENCY 6. RC/L-2 Restore and maintain RPV water level between 9 177.7 in. and 219.5 in, with one or more of 10 the following systems: 11
- 1. Condensate /feedwater system 1450 - O psig (RPV pres-sure range for system operation).
l 2. CRD system 1990 - O psig (RPV pressure range for j system operation).
- 3. RCIC system 1177 - 60 psig (RPV pressure range for system operation. l 12 l
- 4. HPCS system 1403 - O psig (RPV pressure range for system operation) .
- 5. LPCS system 295 - O psig (RPV pressure range for system operation).
- 6. LPCI system 225 - O psig (RPV pressure range for system operation) .
If RPV water level cannot be restored and m* Latained above 177.7 in. , maintain RPV water level above 0 in. (top of active fuel) . If RPV water level can be maintained above 0 in. (top of l active fuel) and the ADS timer has initiated, prevent automatic RPV depressurization by resetting the ADS timer. ! If RPV water cannot be maintained above 0 in. (top of active fuel), enter the instruction developed from CONTINGENCY 1. RC/L-3 When ONI-C71, Reactor Scram, is entered from Step RC/P-5, L proceed to cold shutdown in accordance with ONI-C71. l e L
PGP Page: 68 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines RC/P Monitor and control RPV pressure If while executing the following steps:
- a. Emergency RPV Depressurization is j 13 l anticipated and Boron Injection is not required, rapidly depressurize the RPV with the main turbine bypass valves.
- b. Emergency RPV Depressurization or RPV Flooding is required and less than 8 SRVs are open, enter the instruction developed from CONTINGENCY 2.
- c. RPV Flooding is required and at least 8 SRVs are open, enter the instruction developed from CONTINGENCY 6.
If any SRV is cycling, manually open SRVs, until RPV pressure drops to (later) psig (KPV pressure at which all turbine bypass valves are fully open) . RC/P-1 If while executing the following steps:
- a. Suppression pool temperature cannot 8 i be maintained below the Heat Capacity 13 Temperature Limit (Figure 1) maintain 14 RPV pressure below the Limit.
- b. Suppression pool water level cannot 13 be maintained below the Suppression 14 Pool Load Limit (Figure 2), maintain RPV pressure below the Limit.
- c. Steam Cooling is required, enter the instruction developed from CONTINGENCY 3.
i If while executing the following steps:
- 4. a. Boron Injection is required, and
- b. The main condenser is available, and
- c. There has been no indication of gross -fuel failure or steam line break, Open MSIVs to re-establish the. sain con- l 16 l denser as a heat sink.
.,,r,-,-w-me-, we-- m r v .w t- *,-.-gve-w-r-- .y--v -wga--,* -Wy,--w,-=.n .w ,.ue -- ... - - ,* =-,* -- - ee
.. . _ __ . . . . -. __ _ _ m PGP Page: 69 i Attachment 6 (Cont.)
Perry Speeific Tech-nical Guidelines RC/P-2 Control RPV pressure below 1103 psig l 14 l (1033 psig if SRVs have already lif ted) with the main turbine bypass valves. RPV pressure control may be augmented by one or more of the following systems: l a. SRVs only when suppression pool water level is above 5 f t. 1-3/8 in. (elevation of top I 15 I of SRV discharge device) . If the continuous SRV pneunatic supply is or becones unavail-able, place the control switch for each SRV in the OFF position.
- b. RCIC
- c. Turbine driven feedwater pumps.
- d. RWCU (recirculation mode) if no boron has been injected into the RPV.
- e. Main steam line drains.
- f. RWCU (blowdown mode) if no boron has been injected into the RPV. Refer to SOI-P87 prior to initiating blowdown.
- g. Steam jet air ejectors.
- h. Steam condensing mode of RHR.
t If while executing the following steps the reactor is j not shutdown, return to Step RC/P-2. l RC/P-3 When either: ! 1. All control rods are inserted to or beyond position 02- (maximum suberitical banked withdrawal position), or 1
- 2. 916 pounds (Cold Shutdown Boron Weight) of boron have been injected into the RPV, or
- 3. The reactor is shutdown and no boron has been in-jected into the RPV, depressurize the RPV and maintain cooldown 14 rate below 100*F/hr. (RPV cooldown rate LCO). 17 If one or more SRVs are being used to depressurize the RPV and the continuous SRV pneumatic supply is or becomes unavailable, depressurize with sustained SRV opening.
I 9 v+ y v .. cy, -.--g ....w-v, . , e,_ ...e-- -
%,a--_e,,...-..,,. , .;w..,..-,-#, e-. - . - , - - . ,-.s+w..-mew,,- - _ , , --;--...e. e,-w. - - - . , ,e
PGP Page: 70 1-Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines
- RC/P men the RHR shutdown cooling interlocks clear, initiate the shutdown cooling mode of RHR. l 18 l If the RHR shutdown cooling mode cannot be established
'and further cooldown is required, continue to cool down using one or more of the systems used for depressurization.
j RC/P-5 Proceed to cold shutdown in accordance with ONI-C71. 4 C 9 v
l i i PGP Page: 71 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines RC/Q Monitor and control reactor power If while executing the following steps: , a. All control rods are inserted to or beyond position 02 (maximum suberitical banked withdrawal position, terminate boron injection and enter ONI-C71.
- b. The reactor is shutdown and no boron has been in-jected into the RPV, enter ONI-C71.
RC/Q-1 Confirm or place the reactor mode switch in SHUTDOWN. RC/Q-2 If reactor power is above 5% (APRM downscale trip) or cannot be determined, initiate Alternate Rod Insertion. RC/Q-3 If the main turbine-generator is on-line and the MSIVs are open, confirm or initiate recirculation flow runback to minimum, and downshif t the recirculation pumps to slow speed. RC/Q-4 If reactor power is above 5% (APRM downscale trip) or cannot be determined, trip the recirculation pumps. l Execute Steps RC/Q-5 and RC/Q-6 concurrently. l RC/Q-5 If the reactor cannot be shutdown before sup-pression pool average temperature reaches the l 19 I Boron Injection Initiation Temperature (Figure 3) BORON INJECTION IS REQUIRED; inject boron into the RPV with SLC and prevent auto-matic initiation of ADS. If boron cannot be injected with SLC, inject boron into the RPV by one or more of the following alternate methods: (later) RC/Q-5.1 If boron is not being injected into the RPV by RWCU, con-firm automatic isolation or or manually isolate RWCU. RC/Q-5.2 Continue to inject boron until 916 pounds (Cold Shutdown Boron Weight) of boron have been injected into the RPV. RC/Q-5.3 Enter ONI-C71. 4
- - m ,.. -+, yvw ---.,--.m - w i- - ,. - - - , , c--, ,
PGP Page: 72 , Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines RC/Q-6 Insert control rods as follows: RC/Q-6.1 If any scram valve is not open, remove:
- a. H13-P691 C71-F18A, E
- b. H13-P693 C71-F18C, G
- c. H13-P692 C71-F18B, F
- d. H13-P694 C71-F18D, H (fuses which de-energize RPS scram solenoids) .
When control rods are not moving inward, replace:
- a. H13-P691 C71-F18A, E
- b. H13-P693 C71-F18C, G
- c. H13-P692 C71-F18B, F
, d. H13-P694 C71-F18D, H RC/Q-6.2 Reset the reactor scram. Reset ARI. If the reactor scram cannot be reset, continue in this instruction at step RC/Q-5.4. RC/Q-6.3 . Drain the scram discharge volume and initiate a manual reactor scram.
- 1. If control rods moved inward, return to Step RC/Q-6.2.
- 2. If the scram can be reset, reset the reactor scram.
If the reactor scram cannot be reset, continue in this instruction at . . ep RC/Q-6.4. l
- 3. Open the scram discharge volume vent and drain valve s.
RC/Q-6.4 Manually insert control. rods as follows: If while executing the following steps the reactor scram can be reset and control rods moved inward following the last scram, reset the reactor scram and return to Step RC/Q-6.3.
- 1. Start all CRD pumps.
- 2. Rapidly insert control rods manually. l 20 l
- M-- -'
wWe-w w
PGP Paga: 73 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines Figure 1
.. . ._L y__._.. . . .
i . .
- 4. .
. . . _.......t.....s...0. . . _q . _ . . . . .
. . ._ .t.- _ ...-.i .- _. . .. .- - .r
. .. ..- .- ~
n . . . . . . . . . . .
. .. . _ . . ' ._ . . _ . . . _ . . _ _ _ . . . _ - .._.g'..___.. . . . .. .
. . . . _ _ . _ . ....._..._.._;;_.._.. ... o. ._. .
._ .. .._. .. :. . _ :. . __. . _ .n... ..- ..
9_._......_.-.._
.. . . - . . - . _' . g . --. . . . . _. .--- .-. .--. . . . - . .
_ .~.-- .. ...
..v-._.._..
g._......_.... .c y s .. _ t- 1 + * . o - - . - . - - _ .
, , , , g
* , # 4 . a a
. .. ! a i
- t i e ! s t i
, a a i 2 6
. : . O
- O -
e e t 1 1 6 6 i . ' t . !
- i
- 6 t 0* . t , s .
s '
?
t 6 t I ! 6 9
! I a 6 i e
i 4 i t *
' s
. t i
t 8 ? I
! I 6
1 1
%i M ! t t
t e t i ! e t ; { 4 . ! : I 6 O E i i i ( 6 t + t ! e i . i . I i ! 't
/ t 6 I i e I *
*4
! ]*
i e a i
' " , ~, ,"' '
e 3 . 1 8 i 4 l 6 8 l t 6 i t t 6 i I 6
/ l 1 6 6 6 l t il 1 4 i ! 3 t 1 l s t t I i i t a t t l l t /t ! 6 t I i . I i
! t i bl 4? e ee ) i t i ! t i I t i t ! i . se > t l e a *! i I , a ) Q i 1 e i Cf. 9
> ! t , t i l i
- O g i I t l l . ! I t 6 e t i ! } i t
- e i ! : J - n, 9 ,
t
*- . I it I l l l l } e : i i } ) ) { l t e
- t 1 4 1 , t t $ J g t t g ie i s ;
,i ? I + e i i i t t i 4 l t j i f 1 t ' i t l e t 6 ! ) e ! ( ) ( ; ~ , , I t i
' ' , i t i s 6 l a e4 ' Cf i t i i t
. # t .
i !
;/i.
t l i t i e l i i 4 { i
- i ! .
*.wg~C s1 y
o,, . . t ' i ' i 4 t i t i 4 l i 4 8'{ i
,
- I i i t i e t
- i I l6-'[t/ !il t68l tl 4l t5 6l it t i* it li ie 1 1 sf 1 y3 3 E6 i .
a Laj i 4
' 5 8
t . t I 8 . p/t s t . t : , i ~O 3 % i e t .
? i i . . ,t i 6.t s i t i i , . . 2 e
.f.<
i /t i f fI l i i i t s 6 t i t 6 , e , . . e : .
)) w't 6e >it I e
i 6 . . a t i f (
- i l l s 1 .i. t e l 6 e i i t t 6! t M i t I * ~
- t e ; } 6 , [ i t t l , ; 6 e t 4 g a t ! 8. 1 . t tO . . .
- o. I a., a 6 .
o ~ >. O i e'i ei i 1: # i i i . i / ei i : 1 i i : 6 i i t i e t v- y i i # , t ? ! t t i 6 t Q t6 i fj ii ! a t I i t iI h i A t 6i e l~ l i 1 e I t 4 * . I i 6/I 6 : I ) l 6i i i 1i e i i % it i
+
i *
- i+ 1 i hI i i ! t /. I i e I i t t i i i i *
- gi*
- O+1 e i + ? r a t * ! i nt i i 1 ' t I f t f I l I i ' I i f i I '
64 8 - ' ' ' ' s
- i 8 9 4 l ! I t '[ j i I l : i l l l l l l l I l 5 l 0 i 8 6 a t 3 i i e e I i i +
. e i s t i I t j f l 1 4
eit ; i ei e i e 4 s { i t i 1 e6 t t ie * # t i i i e i t i i. t g* t y y- 4 i e i e
, ' e-O . q. e ;
q' i i , i i e : * , . Ni+ i 4 . i , 4 ei .I t ! e a , i . 4 , i i .t 6! t ! dT, t ; i t i 1.6. s i i. ; ) i e i t
- i 1 i i e i t , i i i l i li 1
- t
- t !3 i i ? ! l4 f l l6 8 i i I t !1
** I !
- 6 ii ! t6 iei ! . 1 ; e- ti i t t t . t , r .o.; , ; , , , , ;
i i e ; i t e i a t i 16 i 6 e i i . t i i i ei t ,2 i ; - i e i , , I ' I
- t- $ $1 l i l l t i f al l 4 31
- 1 } I t i i t i t e t , I i
. i I i i I # 1 i i i l : : 1 i ! i 6 I i i i i t i eii !t i I t i + 1 ea6 s s. t 6 , 6 . L ., e p ; . 6 4 !i i e e i iI ; 6 Ti,.
i I
! gi! *Qi mi,irr 8 f I ?
rgl I i 8 196 ) wi! i f i i t t gt i lot l
- i .5 i ; i i
of I c# i I ' ic O I i t s ' i i , i ! + , i i : , i , i
- 6 $ l I
! I l l 1 i e 6 II i
- 6. dug: ' iogyi y. ? -j g g gyp-1i i * - i i -
t 1 . tt i i e i e i i1 . t i . ., . . i . . . . i e i e.
* *
- j
- ~_t 8
- 3 i f . .
- t i e i . 6 : I . i *i e i . a e . t i i i o i
-i i . .
M
!._f.:! L ..TE .JWMV3df41E _100d NoisMWddnS ! , , , , i i : ;
t ' t i t i Te i t i i ti , e i i i sitt t ; - i i i . i i . i e:
" i i t#,i! '
. i st,i t ii.i. . . . i , i . i i , . i : , , . : - .,
.h
. a,., W s t i i 6
+
i i i e . .!t i> t i e i i i i eii e I t + ? . 6 . ie e
. + i i l i e ,
i I i
. , 1 s a =
t . . i -
..u 1_ ' _ ',_' i + i i i t i i . ' ' . i , , , . 6 i .
t*---- i . .' .
,, , , , t 1--
. i
PGP Page: 74 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines Suppression Pool Load Limit Figure 2 (Later) I L- ,
PGP Page: 75 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines
. . . . . . .-__,4 F re - - - -
- ~ '-
. . . . . . . . . . _ , . . . . ....:_...._-- - . . . . . . . _ . . ~ . - . . . . . . . . . _ .
.. . . . . . _ . . . . - . . - . . _ . . . . . .._- --. . . . ~ . . _ . _ . . . . - . - . . . . . . . . . . - . . .
s a e i . k _._ . . _ . _ . . _ M
~
i . , , , . t . oc -- e , s t ,- g , ,* &
. , , , , , F-e i
, , , . . i 4 . . . . . .
. , g_ _ __
*
- 1 ,e i ! s .
s ! ! , I s l .% U e < p -*- '8
. ."8 6 i t 5 4 i e
- 2 i s
==
i i e t i + . ' t - . .
' ! ! ! e e t * . I t ' + 1 i ** A3_ s 4 b
e , I% t L
+ t i , 6 i t 3 l t ,
, e a i . ; ; a i p ; a t a e+ i
- t
- t i . ! ' '
f I a t i 8 -O
! 6 6+ 1 p:
i i i
! i t ; -
, s i ' i p +
t . i ye _y _. I a l l i i e i . t . t Dl ' i ' t ! * ! h 4 ' I s i ? ?
) w T
' f V '
a + e t i a
. A i
i f 6 g - Z' '
, a
. . . . . , 1 ,
- g. - ,
f a . . e . : . . I a t I * * * . O i e i i . . 6 , i E^i i + 1 i .
- i , i : li . .
a e i t i i i e t *-r e i . t a t i , I ? I e i ' i ! t-o I O _t
- 4 *
* * * - ! I e I i i i ! 6 : ' l 4 ? ! i I . i I 4 e i e i I I j hf , *
! l i i I ; i
- I i /
8 I ! e.* i
- 1
- a e i e t (L 6
- h i
+
1 1 * . .*. . 4 a 6 r s e i a * * & t - ' i 1.Lt r !
-t i 4 ' .
I i i t } g! - . t i f i i i i
- i i t 6 4 4 6 3 + ~lP >
i i , . i -
, t 4 } l t g;/ e t i i i e i t t - -i , i i 6 -r . Z t : i , . . . .
r s . t + + 4 i ' V t e e t e i a i 4 . e e
- 05' ' " '
*
- i i e i , i
- t , i i t e i e I I i i '
g,r , , a
* . : i t I 1 i l 1 i l 6
( iI t e e l i i 1;i _6 + t i ! t i i 1 ) I i t ' O'*
* ' + . i 4
e-l t 9 6 i i t l l ? l l t t t # l 41 I g I t .i . 6 f & ) i. , t ; a ,+ i i e i 'i
, , . . , i . , , ! i i , . . i ,
3 9 , O' l ' l I i I j I t i i I l ' l t 8 i f l 1 i j ! I i t I e i i . , i i . , i , aa i *
* . i 4 l' e .i i a j t l '
- I ' '
t 1 ? ! ! l 1 4 i i i 1 if l l 4 1 ? I i 4 i i I 3 i i : I ! $ e ! . t + 4 ' i ! l 1 j . ' t ; i
! I e : . # ! , e i t i ! p # : e a * }4 I i e . e i i :
; . i e a i s. i a i t . -
- a e 4.s. g i i . , e g i j ( ; ,
. t ' I { g { ; I l e , , , i e 9 e # , , , , e f : } j j .
t
- t DIMM.YL ,#
~~~'i ! l i OI I 1 g*! !giie i OI ' l 'O! I i g*8 I I i I ' 3 t 4 ,
- i .
- i . t. 1 l t1 i r i U e e -' i -
t ! i i . r . . e g _, . e t . a? ' I
- I e t l . l e t , i * .
t i t
- e : 4 1
'. i ' t ! ! i 1 3 8 I i l l i i i l . t I !l . I e a I l l t = I , I i l ; .__ . .J T i t i i ..
- . t (' d.) 2MMVW2dW2r _'100d Nois93tidd. n9' . . i6 t.
i t , i
. . I
- s 2 + i e : , a e 6 i ; I t , 6 t ; } e i t i ; ; i i ; i . s i ! i eit t ' i i I l i i t !i t i t i I l t i i i t ! . : i 4 e .
- i i e l It i I
,_1., 1 i . I I i 4
-lI i tiii e t ! I i t tii i i it i i i i i a it it 1 e i ii :t i - . i e >
t i e ii! i i .t ie ; ei i ri6 -
, i i t , i ii
. - , i e !
i,t.q.:iit
. i . . t i i ! i t >> . t !.i, , -
i i i i
PGP Page: 76 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nica'. Guidelines PRIMARY CONTAINMENT CONTROL GUIDELINE PURPOSE The purpose of this guidelines is to: L 1. Maintain prinary containment integrity, and
- 2. Protect equipment in the primary containment.
. ENTRY CONDITIONS t' The entry conditions for this guideline are any of the following:
- 1. ' Suppression pool average temperature above 95'F (most limiting
; suppression pool temperature LCO) during normal operation.
2.. Drywell average temperature above 135'F (drywell temperature ICO).
- 3. Containment average temperature above 90*F (containment temperature 140).
- 4. Drywell pressure above 1.68 psig (high drywell pressure scram set-point) .
(.
- 5. Suppression pool water level above 18 f t. 6 in. (maximum suppression pool water level I40) .
- 6. Suppression pool water level below 18 ft. O in. (minimum suppression ,
pool water level 100). [. h'
- i. .
i
,,e g ,_w.m.,c-.s, - - - - ' n-"*e="F'*7-*""""'T-"@4wyTg srW"'"y'Mm-*MT T-*'r*vYTT"*"'"8""'*17-r* W
, p._. v6h*'ve'"M T-Ft^"P"t'e'
~l l
l PGP j , Page: 77 l Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines OPERATOR ACTIONS SP/T Monitor and control suppression pool temperature. SP/T-1 Close all SORVs. SP/T-2 When suppression pool average temperature exceeds 95'F, (most limiting suppression i 18 I pool temperature LCO), operate available , suppression pool cooling. SP/T-3 Before suppression pool average temperature reaches 110*F, scram the reactor. SP/T-4 If suppression pool average temperature cannot be maintained below the Heat Capa- 18 city Temperature Limit (Figure 1), main- 13 tain RPV pressure below the limit; enter 14 the instruction developed from the RPV Control Guidelines at Step RC-1 and execute it concurrently with this instruction. If suppression pool average temperature and RPV pressure cannot be restored and maintained below the Heat Capacity Temperature Limit, EMERGENCY RPV DEPRESSURIZATION IS REQUIRED.
PGP Page: 78 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines DW/T Monitor and control drywell temperature. DW/T-1 When drywell average temperature exceeds . 135*F, operate available drywell cooling. l 6 l DW/T-2 If drywell average temperature cannot be maintained below 330*F (maximum temperature at which ADS qualified or drywell design tem-perature, whichever is lower), EMERGENCY RPV DEPRESSURIZATION IS REQUIRED; enter the instruc-tion developed from the RPV Control Guidelines at Step RC-1 and execute it concurrently with this instruction. G
. - , , , _ , -m-, ,
PGP Page: 79 . Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines CN/T Nbnitor and control containment temperature. CN/T-1 When containment average temperature ex-ceeds 90*F (containment temperature 100), l 6 l operate available containment cooling. If while executing the following steps containment spray has been initiated, when containment pressure drops below (later) psig, terminate containment spray. CN/T-2 Before containment average temperature reaches 185'F (containment design tempera- l 18 l ture), but only if containment pressure is above (later) psig (Mark III Containment Spray Initiation Pressure Limit), initiate containment spray. CN/T-3 If containment average temperature cannot be main-tained below 185'F (containment design temperature), EMERGENCY RPV DEPRESSURIZATION IS REQUIRED; enter the instruction developed from the RPV Control Guideline at Step RC-1 and execute it concurrently with this' instruction.
i PGP Pager 80 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines PC/P Monitor and control primary containment pressure. PC/P-1 Operate the following systems, as required:
- 1. Containment pressure control systems. Use SOI-Mil.
- 2. Drywell purge only when the tempera-ture .in the space being evacuated l 21 l is below 212*F (Maximum Noncondensi-ble Evacuation Temperature). Use SOI-M14.
If while executicg the following steps containment spray has been initiated, when containment pressure drops below (later) psig, terminate - containment spray. , PC/P-2 Before suppression chamber pressure reaches the Pressure Suppression Pressure 8 i-(Figure 2) but only if containment pressure 18 is above (later) psig (Mark III Containment Spray Initiation Pressure Limit), initiate containment spray. PC/P-3 If containment pressure cannot be maintained below the Pressure Suppression Pressure (Figure 2), DtER-GENCY RPV DEPRESSURIZATION IS REQUIRED. PC/P-4 If containment pressure cannot be maintained below the Primary Containment Design Pressure (Figure 3), RPV FID0 DING IS REQUIRED. PC/P-5 If containment pressure cannot be maintained below
- the Primary Containment Pressure Limit (Figure 4),
then irrespective of whether adequate core cooling is assured, initiate containment spray. PC/P-6 If containment pressure exceeds the Primary Containment Pressure Limit, then irrespec- l 22 l tive of the offsite radioactive release rate, vent the primary containment in accor-dance with (instruction for containment venting) to reduce and maintain pressure below the Primary Containment Pressure Limit.
~
PGP l Page: 81 I Attachment 6 (Cont.)
- Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines SP/L Monitor and control suppression pool water level.
SP/L-1 Maintain suppression pool water level between 2 18' 6" (maximum suppression pool water level 8 LCO) and 18' 0" (minimum suppression pool water 9 level 140) . Refer to SOI-P87 prior to dis-charging water. Suppression pool makeup may be augmented by SPMS. l If SPMS has been initiated, maintain suppression pool water level between 22 f t. 5 in. (SPMS initiation set-point plus suppression pool water level increase which results from SPMS operation) and 18' 0" (minimum suppres-sion pool water level LCO). If suppression pool water level cannot be maintained above 18' 0" (minimum suppression pool water level LCO), execute Step SP/L-2. ? If suppression pool water level cannot be maintained below 18' 6" (maximum suppression pool water level 140) 22 ft. 5 in. (SPMS initiation setpoint plus suppression pool water level increase which results from SPMS opera-tion if SPMS has been initiated), execute Step SP/L-3. SP/L-2 SUPPRESSION POOL WATER LEVEL BELOW 18' 0" (minimum sup-pression pool water level LCO)
- Maintain suppression pool water level above the Heat Capacity Level Limit (Figure 5).
If suppression pool water level cannot be maintained above the Heat Capacity Level Limit, EMERGENCY RPV DEPRES-SURIZATION IS REQUIRED; enter the instruction developed from the RPV Control Guidelines at Step RC-1 and execute it concurrently with .this instruction. SP/L-3 SUPPRESSION POOL WATER LEVEL ABOVZ 18' 6" (maximum sup-pression pool water level 140) (22 f t. 5 in. (SPMS initia-tion setpoint plus suppression pool water level increase , which results from SPMS operation if SPMS has been ! initiated). 1 - Execute Steps SP/L-3.1 and SP/L-3.2 concurrently. l SP/L-3.1 Maintain suppression pool water level below the Suppres-
- sion Pool load Limit (Figure 6).
. If suppression pool water level cannot be main-tained below the Suppression Pool Ioad Limit, 13 maintain RPV pressure below the Limit. 14 i
PGP Page: 82 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines If suppression pool water level and RPV pressure cannot be maintained below the Suppression Pool Load Limit but only if adequate core cooling is assured, terminate in-jection into tra RPV from sources external to the primary containment except from boron injection systems and CRD. If suppression pool water level and RPV pressure cannot be restored and maintained below the Suppression Pool Load Limit, EMERGENCY RPV DEPRESSURIZATION IS REQUIRED; enter the instruction developed from the RPV Control Guittelines at Step RC-1 and execute it concurrently with this instruction. SP/L-3.2 Before suppression pool water level reaches 66 ft. 2 in. (Maximum Primary Containment hter Level Limit) but only if adequate core cooling is assured, terminate injection into the RPV from sources external to the primary con-tainment except from boron injection systems and CRD. Een primary containment water level reaches 66 f t. 2 it.. (Maximum Primary Containment Water Level Limit), terminate injection into the RPV from sources external to the pri-mary containment irrespective of whether adequate core cooling is assured. s f-- % l v
----r- , -- --%,. -.~ -. -= -=r- - ,c- e- -
~
PGP Page: 83 Attach:nent 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines Figure 1
.. , . - . . . ~ . -.
. 'I.-_ a i.
. I.
. .i ..
._... ;. _ . ._ . . ~ . ...
e
.. ~.. _........ **)-
O O...-. .. . . . . . .
; i e ! * *
..-..-..,t_-.'.t.,",-. .N
. . . . . . -..~.. * '
g . .
.........-.-..q..... .
- o. ..~
. R. . .. O _ .. _ . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . ....' .. ._.. a_....'.- . g . -- . .. . . - . . '..__ ........ ...-. .
~
..V_.-..... g . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . - - q..
! ' ' I I '
$ 4._O-
- 8 , e ! . i 1
* ' O t
*
- I . *
. . . i t c e.} ! a t i .
- 6 s e * . .
i *e * * . t O t 6 1 - O I t ! ! l i e i e
- I e !
- P t
- s
. e t
I i . t s t l l t 8 i i i a a + e i 8 t t t
=
8
- s 6
- p,': !
. I e ! e t ; p . 4 t 4 O E 5 ,
t i 6 , t i e e i l t t 6 l t i j i 8 i e i l a e i/5 l 5 i l i e 4 *
, , i 6 4 I t i t I t I I t t i
]' . 5 i e i r I e l
.u.,,,_,
' ' ' 4 "
e a ' r 1 : t i 6 I i ! )
- i i } t i / t t 6 t i * .
- 8 8 t i U.1 . 4
- 6
<. i .
I l t I e 6 e I ! t ti. e a i t i e ' ' : I e a i O i
- t DC !
O , ai
- I f I v i i 8 ) I t i e t ; l i * : 8 li l ' t ? i 9 g J 8 ~! n.
e t s t i t . f l
< a i * , I s t t t i 4
l l
} I s l l l t }
; i 9 I t t t i t l l i ! t i l l e f I 6 6 t . 1 I t -i a
; i ! . cW ' ' }I
- i
' T 8 ' i i t t ' i !
,___* ? e i i t i i i i 61 ' Iiis I i 1 8
'hn y i e-,, , t t !
. , i t . / , . i i i i . .w v o. . .
i ' i
- I i t 8 e i 1 44 4 8') I l8 4 te t I i ! I t i i
- i i i La.s
- E' ' ' I
! t
- t 6
- t g(.' ' lat -l e + 1 I t *
- 4
- I I t 1 I t * ! l I ? l i I l 8 , t i ! 8 r i ? t I a s t * ~O D b.,
O ~ tt} ~
-a '
, t i . . t t . . . t , * *
- 6 9 e . . e
- _% , I
<- ! . l . t a ) i . I i 1 . t /t i e f I eI I 6 e i t i t 6 e is
- i >it i e i 6-
. i + ! t ! l 6 t. ) i -l i
) l 8 8 i t 1 : I . I
..i.! e t i i t t , t e t :
i i t ! t. s . l I t *
. iO .
.( i ,
bt y
- e .t
- 6 - =
4 s ' . - . i i ei i 1: ti i i i f i t i ei i , t i i , e ?. g ! xit i i t ? i t i 6 Ot t6 /t t! t i t , i e i i o. - I c.+6ii i l'l f
- i t i e i* 1 l t i i / ) i L l l1 i i i i 4 i ! : f % i I I 4 8- I e t i Di} t /. 4 '
l l l1 ( t I i i i i t
- 9 i + Ce 4 ' i
.i? - ee t i i: i e i '/i i t ! I t ' # : t . t -
Mii e > - *
- i
- *, e i it ! ! 'g i 1 , i ,- . . ,
j t t, , i,/ ; i , , , 6i! i i t : I 66 i ei
.Qi 1 m....,
. g.
. t ' t t I i t i I l l l 6 t l 9 e ; g 6 . 4 t e ,- i , , i . .
- f .to a e 4 i .
. . ii.ii.. 'e
! i i ,
n , i i - . . i , i I I ' t4ll{' ' t [ t I t ! l .l . I t i- l t 1 6 t 8 I i i ! I l e t
, i fI8 8 ? I f Il 8
- t !
- I l l 4 i l 8 l l ! l
- t 8
- 6 i l l 1i i i . I ; i- i i ! t ? i .o . . ! e i, l '
I 8- 8 i i l I I i i $ 0 I ) I t l . t i l i t I t , .O.
- I '
I l l 8 ' I ' 1 l l ) $ t } } t ( l 4 1 t i i ! ! I t iit i ! e l l * { l i I l- ! ! 2 i l it i i i I 6- t I i i t i i I i i ! I t : i l i !I II i
- 4 6 1 =s4 a 8. t i .L4+ ,
i e : e . : i i) i , e t i t l l j l ' 8 ' l l 1 I t i t i t i t i j ' l I ' 8 I I l t I Il l $[ 4. , s!.< ' d. % 'M@s J,.',7N,AJg . .M.r w.%i t>.'.W."
. " .+
~ git tot --g ea '
Ji i i i i oTIf tI o ! i i it t i . , i g 't i !o e ot i Ti? e wIe t !t i-" 6 - "I i 'e ii(t I i 2 1+i i 6 4 i ! -: t t l . l$ $ f l l l l l l l l t 8 I \ l I l -t i l I 5, 3
- 6 [ e i j g . e t ) t l t s
~!I s'- i t t ; t .
. t i i l l . a t i * . t : i . i . * * ' . i
- 4 46 i- i . , t_u .t.i.; (R) JW1YV33W1C.700CNolM3WJ2MSl . ; I t i e i i
._e_ G
*-t I! i ~'l i , t iei 6 t : 1.t t i i
- t. , i ,
i i i i t t i ; < i i , i e i ; i 1 - : i e ,
, i 1 u ! It t I ! I l i
.1 l - t t i6 i i i s i i e i i e t t s . t e . t i e . . i . t i ; _.i. .
4 *
- 8 I i i t f i '
I f e 6 4 '
*l_!... .I ! , I l -- _9i}j l l t 4 . ? l sj - 7 l ? *
!-l l a l 2 ,
t
. I e
.. .i .
i . t
;..+-* ' 8 t *
.1 f' [ t t t r ,
i . . ,
, t a
PGP Pzgn: 84 Attachment 6 (Cont.) t- ' Perry Specific Tech- - nical Guidelines i i l l l l } l l f I f l ! ! f t # . i i i I 8 ; I , a 1 t I I i I,
' l i
' I ! l i I j '
IF:gute 2 t I^ I II i i
! $ 4 4 i eil i l i ) l t I i I i l l iif i 16 , )
l8 ! $ $ I i 1 t i l i ' i i l a l l ITU
}
I l t l l ' I I i i * ' t i ! l i i i i l ll3 6$ 8 i il 1 i i I i i i l I i ! I i l I I t ti l l l
- i i i I l l1 1 I I i + 1 i l i i i , . I i : l I l i i t i I t 4 i i i l I i . i t I t lI i ! I I l i t i' i l I i I
- l I i e ) I i i i i , I i i l i l i 9 i l I l i
- I l l 6 l 1 i i 6 6 i i I1
* ' i e i I i l I i i I i e ' I i t ' i I (
s
+
4 1 l i I l a t1ti8 e l ! } l l ' i I l l I i I i l lI ' I i lii l 4 . t I l } ( l I i ! I l il i i i e t l } l j i i i I t ! O l I i l i l i I l l44
- I i 1 4 I !l I ! I I i 1 l l l 1 I i i i l .I Ii II ii ii i4 ii I$ i? i i i i li i ni i ?o'i II i jt ii il Ii ( l I
l l4 s 1- 1 I i t i I l I I i I i l 'M
- i i 4 i I eiiiii l i i i 6 I l l M ! e 4 i l t i i i l
$ 8 I i i 1 ~
i I i I i I : i I i l 1 1 l Il g- Il6 i ! l 1 I i l f l l l l l1 t i i t s l l l $ 1 pi ,
.p
-l l
[j i I f l 1 l l 1 l l I I t i M i ' I W WI i l I p7I ta .dl 1 ! *
' I i l ' t i l l I i l i l I l l l l i i $ l I i i vi 3iI
- I 1
i i i l i t i i l i I i i i i i l i i L i, 1
.i i l i i I l If i n I i i i l i W I I
'l I i i I I l i ! I I I I I l q'1 i i i i i l l l 'il I i i i ! l l } 1 l i 1 l I l/ P ,
' 1 1 I '
r i i a > I I I I l i I lil l l !-t / 6 $I ' o'31g I l 5 1 4 i I ( ) I l 1 6 i i l 41 I l l l 8/ti NI -4 9 W l n i l i .j. ~ I; l l l I l , 1 3 3 I !
! l l 5 1 i i I ? I I i l l l I 1 i 1 I I 70 l i l > l 1 ' t I l 1i i i i i V, i i k l t i 6 e i I$ $ l/ l t il i1$ 4'w __ Ql zi iiI !
=
I I I I I I i 1/ I i _ l 4 !F l - 1 i i l l ) ! t i i6 i ! / I i I l l' iI 1% l# I I hI ! ! 3
'.t i l Ql i t 6 l i$ 1 6 1/'[li 1 Il i I l j i I
. I l l 5 l I i $ l i A $6 l l i I
-l ? IilI li 4 e f6 i ' f f 'Qg i i e i 9e o. I 6 i i e i fI i i /i i t l l 6 I t *
- t i 1 i ) i 1-1
! iFt i i ?
4 i $ I I i 1 l l t 1 I I i i i 1-61 i fi i I I I t I t t 6t i i I i ' o 'l. 48 81 6 d I t f biif f i i ' I i I i 4 a I i e i l 4% e if i ( l I t i I i 1 e I a i 4 di N i i Il 1 1 I t i I I t l l l l 6 l * [l t t
- I ll I i i i i i f I e i l i i i I ; i e i tl t i t i . $ i l i ) i
- -) : I ' s ; } i t i i t i ! l i , &
I I I i i i 6 j l 4 i Iii i i e i l I i ! l 4 l 4 i l i i i l 4 i 19 i l i i I 1 l l i l i i s I 8 4 0 4 I e i l I t 6 i 6 ! ! l > e I i ) i l i i I i i l i ~ 6
- cc
- t I '
l 4 1 I l I il ! l 6 f 5 i e i i I l t 1 i M f I I i I I ! I t i 4 i I l h i I i l I i l I i i I I l f
- l f f i j l l l I Il l I i l! l l t I i l 1
I } l t iI l i I e i l i l I I i 8 a l' 4 I I e i i i 4 $ l } l 1 1 f L I rf f I l I i i l i i I I ! 8 l l l t i I l i l i i l l l l [] 1 I l 4 I l i i i l l l l 1 a l i i l i l i l i j i l l I $ $
'bI
'8 O. ' I
' e B i l II I t l ' I . I j t I i t t 6 t i I e i i 1 i 1 ! ' I l i t i i 5 '
' ' = a '
e t 4 * + . l a I *
- _. 1<. # -
n. G' f . 1 I i i t , i 6 i ( i i
- Ii4 s I I i r . 4 I '
- i i
- e t ! l l . I
- i l I i I I
- l l 1 i l 1 l t i I l t & ' 3
! t I l t i t 4 i a4 1
(* , & i 6 ' ' i ) ' i 1 6 8 I I s t e
. . . ~ . - -
. . . - . . . . . . . . ., . - - . .......---_---n.-.
. 6 * ! l
- 3 e (
i i . l i e i f e a * ' i s . I t & , t 4 1 j i ; i 1 6 i i i e i e i t t i t , s , 't t- <t ,-l 1 ! s- 1-
- s
- t iI 6 . !
4
' ' s i . l . 1 2 s l F l
' 4 ' t g t I t gi
- I e t !
I %., a $ r. r pw Ngs 4l n.pt ...p
- i . .
4 1- ,
- i -. , , , i , i i . .
.i..
, a 6 . t : .
.l O
t 4 t . T. 1a :. _ l'_. -. .. . _ . . .l, tIF);,3 BMS S 3Wd :'il39 WVHO T, No lSS3Vdd r19*
-..~,,
* ' ' i i I j i
- i 8 l 8 1 4 i 6 6 _, '
i 6 I I ' , . l i i I 4 i a l I je i * , I 6 i
- t i i i
' i - <
' i j i i I +
I i 6 l I l t i i i ' 1 . ! t t 1 I I i 4 l t t I a l l l l a
.+ .
ti ! i . . i ; . I i .. , '
- f 1 < 1 i . ' 1
( l
,' 4 i e , ' l' i ! , , . 1 . .
w ,,,,,,u.-~~..~- - e
g--_-- =- ,
.. p .,
p g . e.t i- -[.-tp ;.;- .l.- 7;gi
,,;.t- , , i-
,' g !
.j . _ . _. .~.._4 o
,..1.-
r ;.. -.r p . ,
,.j . -
s - _ - . . - - - . - -
- tI- I. 1_.I . l . -
' :;.sg .
, tv-
.;;,l.
~
;+
r
- t. . :; [
s
.]. . _
y.. l I -
-l '
.tj.'
~"
I .
' [.r _ . -_ .
f[' ;)* *L. dl ' lj!'t.!. [48 t T. 8,YS PSI'G .
.. t- .
l D
- l -
), -
_ ,/,; ,
'd -
t ie il pe l
.* j ;- -
-t
- 67) :
.] ; ,
, _ j .} _ g.
k.
'[ -l l l , ! M*I5!
- l, ,!! - - l $ l-- - - -
-; l-l- ,- L I L- .t
,6 J 'j t - . . s - .. - - -
g{ _n _ ..u_ J yn,.{Itl '1 +!- - l j ; ..
... _. . _ _ j. -l! _-.
- '_ [-
- _. v.i '.. . . _ . . . .. . l. ei __
i_ . l , l. (; i .7 , Lag l) 'II . __ _ _ __ _ .. - _-
, _l- _ _
_I _ j. c ve
. l ,. sf ' * -
.. ; .. ._ t - .
j.
', d .j. . l..I .t l .; j i
v> i
; so 10 +
i,
.w. . _ .
i et j I.
- a. ,t _ l i .. l,.i
,)
. l
,N -
.i3 i .j Ii .-r . , -
)j*
I i , _(J3 J FT.I, 8.4 '@) G . _ . L. _
. *; m3 ,l . _ .
_ g._ _- _ . - __,-~h. .. _ .
- j. .
.I l ! . . . . , _ . . . _ _ _ -. .- { . . .
' t.
g i f.; y,. .. . .
.h g.
.[
;z j . Ic
*q!i,'t - - -
3
>0?i l .!
x
- I,.>i, iI :
. e I.
- I. ;-
leo ..
. o; , I 1 .
I. It l 2 3.. I - -
~ ., ..-
. .y i 1; f.
,- .n.. c ,
. .' 1 - . a'1i _ L. _
J . . et ..
'l.. . _ . . _ . . . . . _ .
, ,, 1 a _ i
;l,{
ll l ';. - --j
't .
, f l l ~l lL .
l 30 40 I-h l 10 20 i ! . . i l i . i 4
; < !, * ' ; I ' i PRIMA RY CONTAINM ENT WATER i iI i
l !-
! llllll lllllllI lll DESIGN PRESSURE" LEVEL l l l l i' I I(FEET)!! ! l! !
!' ^
i
! I i
I I l PRIMARY CONTAl,NMENT l i l!.! a i l '!'I
.: i I,
I i
.t f ~ p .o i
ea e r* o es
- p. .c m .u r, on aJ Y
l '8 *;j i 2 mo e i, l t i i 'I - l !! e-* 4 n-b hun . WG D ii .
- a. o r, Ut
< p_e P96
&* 6*
Ch
.g
' DO A m ()
05 e-I O
@ D
. O rt D* -
A I v
'a4
,% .s
'i1 e ' h; l' I ~l; ' I' l .hp ti l l .tf . , ,
ll f.-l' 1
; . . f.
'}- :. i, '
s e
; .4 .j l ?
g '. l ,
. i,' ! ! , .l t : l ',* i .i4 L j ]-j. ;*'lr. ! !. !
! i ,1 l
3 6 s]
! I f ? t ! .. 4 - I . .
! .'! !. ! l d
- f. l..
t : -
) .
tj ' , ..!l n 4 i .g f.
!{I ,Q!! . _ . . . . -
{ -{.
. . ! - l t l- i t f ! !65! - -
ll l 8 jj
!h'!ff - - '
f-l
!. ,i ::I e !!
t ' 3 . . .. s
- w I V) w l e
~
d i l'
~ ~
i .i l _ _(18 FT.,57.4 PSIG) . . . !. } i ! l 0- ,l< s l , , , , _ j l
!. '.! g l i {. . . _ . . _. . ._ .
l_. Is, L , m , . . sN . _ _ . . . i EO I j i ( ! j' . s '. s .. . _ s N
. j .I l . , .
.. ! o;, . . . ._.
I
.Ni
. . _ $ [J3.3 FT.I,55.$ PSIG) 'Il. ..
.; j :i .
oi;I
.E :
l
. , ,g i . . . .
- 7. . . t.
jl '
, W I l I _ . .l hl l1 t !l t i .
cd A t 4'8 I
-{ 00 C' 8
. gjj,g{,, y
~
~
~
~
~
~
-l g -;
i '; l 1
' [t .M ; { l ,. i .*
.p ~l i ! } t 1 , N s I ( l i -
I
~
g llg- ,
- 1,- t {; - '
.I.{..
},.i'i ; ,
ll
' g i I l 10 20 - 30 'to l 1_. j . .
.t ! I 1I i ! 'I j !. l
! .I i I 'l - ; ' t. PRIMA lRY CONTA INMENT WATER LTVEt"(FEET) _ '. ,i - _,
l !.'
!!i;,i
!: lllll -lllll l l I l' ll ; .! !
i I
. ; i .
I' {}
' :1 i
PRIMARY C'ONTAIN MEN l T PRESSURE LIMIT
. l !l!
I
. 1.'.
i 'I l gs .c > u
- o i ;
l l
.. 2 amO
- t ;i
- 1 i. ;i;lP* on n oo o e ! l >i '
- 8 l i
l l,. . I i m m m. na I. s I ; ie iM O! c _ h P- $. D .o D. o n
. m >*
>.* Ph @
y .. go 3
.t t to >4 0
. f. O D a -."
. . .x ; s
*1 l. f
7,..
'a j_.l . - !. : _ . _
- d. . . . .. . _ . _ . . ._ . ._ . _
_h _ _ _ _ _ ..____.J... .._.ld L'
. . .q. . _
_! .1. {_
}t _ _ . - _ - _ . . . _ _. .. _ _ . . . _ .. - _.. . __ .. . - _ _ ._. - _ _ .. -
. l. ] i .; -
. , j . . . _ _ _ .. _ _ _ . . . . . . ._
_ ._4 7 _.p -. .i i ..._ _ . .- . _ . ,. . - __Ll_1_ 6: lj . . .. . .. _ _ _ _ _ .. _ .. __ .. .. . . . .. . .'_i_ L I... - _ - _ . . _ _ .. - - .. _ _ _ .J.. . .s_
. , . . ; 4_ .
_g ; . ; . _. , .; . . . _ _ _ . . . _. . . _ . . .
.gl . . . - . . _ . . . .. . . - . _ . _ _ _ .- - ._.l,.. t . - _.
. .!,l_. , . . i _ . - _ . .
_ j . l.. _. . _. . _ -_}_ _ ._
!_ { g. .
.]
,6 .f' . . _ _ _ .. . _ ._ e _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ .- - . _ . . _ .. _ _ _j ._
. . , . . . _ . . . . . . . . ._ _ .- .- _ _- . _ . _. _ _ . _ _ _. _ u_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ .. _ -
._. L. L . . .t . . l. . I l.. . . . _ _ _. _ _ _ _ . . - _ _ ._ _ _ _ .. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _-.. . _ ..
__.i
, .L . p . j gg .-
- yl.
. .l.. _ _
.,g ;j
,e
___.t _f__s_ 4 . ,a . _ _ . _ . . . . .
..j. ._ ? _ .d
____M. tj. j; _ _ ._ . _ . .. _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _- _ __. i
.y g _ _ gy _ __ _. _ _ _ _ .- ..
, .l . . . . 1 _t . . . _ . _ . . .. ._ _ _
- i. . l .E,,, .. . .. . . . _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ .. - _ - . .. _ .. .. _ _
I ig . _- . . _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . - _ __ ._
! tw _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ .. . . . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ .
_ L
. e >- . fg .
j !.
. i 3, _ . _ _ . . . _ . . _. - _ _ __ _ . . - . _ . _ - . _ _. - _. ..,
- i. ]. !. . _ _ . . . _ . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ .
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .. _ _ _ . . - . _ ..._ _L
'g.. _ . _. _ .
} . _ _
j e. . .;t. _ .. _ -. _ _ ___ _ _ .. _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. . _ _ _ _ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _. .. . _. _. ._ i._ . ..
., . - ;g . . __ _. _ _ .. - _ _ .. _ _ _ ._ _ _ _..__. __ ._ _ . _
.1 . . .io . .. _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . -- _..- _ _. __ _ _ _ _ _. __ .. .,. _ _ _ . ._._ __._. .. - _ . - _ _. _._,
..l. a .
._]m. _ _ _
Q .. . ._ . . . . _ _ _ ._ . _. . . _. . _ _. _ _. _ _ _ .. . - - _ _ _ __ . _! il Ig l j9 ,,
] _A
. ' .o 1 . . _ . _ _ _ .. _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ - . . _ - . _ - - _ .
_ty _ p : !., ,
--..li 4
- 1. .
.l.l..,jlt .
_. _ n.
.q _1
_ 1 f.1l .. _ .l. i
.i 8 -l. . . .. - .. .. . . . . _..
3-j.! ! ..._l . _!. i . f . I, lo . _. Ao _ lJo___ l 50
..l_.
- (,0
_l- _ 70 . _l l . l40l. l;tlj i_ .. . _ _ _ .. . . . . _ _ .
, { . _ .- . . . MRGibl TO H C,T L 3
AT,,,, . ( *Fl. _ . . _ _ . . _ 7 i .
.s ;....
, ii l , , i a 8
. I. l. .I . . _ _ . _ _ . _ .. _ _ _ ... _ .
tII i
. 4.i i i i
;. i . HEAT. CAPACITY LEVEL I M IT.:. _ _ _ . _
i .i
- J ~. ~. D .
m >mm ll
*I e : I . . . . _ _ _ .
_ j.- W @ M Da O it l.! n n nmm
' I I .
i i , ,.
- l. 4
. ; l 1 .
[ t l I l -j .h4 'M4
# 2 S o==
P .Mo . <m
' \. &W D%
,. o. a n
.A S P
.i , rw cb
_: M
*'. D o n
.5
, m n 4 (D >-] O
.* m D
, e o n
.1 3'
- i l v N
, i .
l PGP Page: 88 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines Suppression Pool Load Limit Figure 6 (Later) 4,r-8
PGP Page: 89 l Attachment 6 (Cont.) ' Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines RADIOACTIVITY RELEASE CONTROL GUIDELINE PURPOSE The purpose of this guideline is to limit radioactivity release into areas outside the primary and secondary containments. ENTRY CONDITIONS The entry condition for this guideline is:
- 1. Offsite radioactivity release rate above the Offsite release rate which requires an Alert.
OPERATOR ACTIONS + RR-1 Isolate all primary systems that are discharging into areas outside the primary and secondary containments except systems required to assure adequate core cooling or shut down the reactor. RR-2 If offsite radioactivity release rate approaches or exceeds the
, offsite release rate which requires a General Emergency and a pri-mary system is discharging into an area outside the primary and secondary containments, EMERGENCY RPV DEPRESSURIZATION IS REQUIRED; enter the instruction developed from the RPV Control Guidelines at Step RC-1 and execute it concurrently with this instruction.
I l e E V , 3 I L :.
PGP Page: 90 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines CONTINGENCY 1 LEVEL RESTORATION If while executing the following steps:
- 1. Boron Injection is required or boron has been injected into the RPV, enter the instruction developed frc:=
CONTINGENCY 7.
- 2. RPV water level cannot be determined, RPV FLOODING IS Rl! QUIRED; enter the instruction developed from CONTIN-
, CENCY 6.
- 3. RPV Flooding is required, enter the instruction developed from CONTINGENCY 6.
Cl-1 Line up for injection and start pumps in 2 or more of the following injection subsystems:
- a. Condensate /feedwater b.. HPCS
- c. LPCI-A
- d. L PCI-B
- e. LPCI-C
- f. LPCS If less than 2 of the injection subsystems can be lined up, commence lining up as may of the following alternate injection subsystems as possible:
- a. RHR - emergency service water crosstie
'b. Fire system
- c. ECCS keep-full systems
- d. SLC (test tank)
- e. SLC (boron. tank)
- f. Suppression Pool Cleanup (via RHR)
- g. Suppression Pool Cleanup-(via liquid radwaste, RWCU, and RHR)
- h. Condensate transfer (via RHR)
- 1. Condensate Transfer (via condensate demineralizers, liquid radweste and RHR
- j. Condensate Transfer (via RWCU filter /demineralizer and RHR)
- k. CRD If while executing the following steps:
- 1. The RPV water lev.2 trend reverses or RPV pressure
- changes region, return to Step Cl-2.
- 2. RPV water level drops below 16.5 in. (ADS initiation ,
setpoint), prevent automatic-initiation of ADS.
PGP Page: 91 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines Cl-2 Nbnitor RPV pressure and water level. Continue in this instruction at the step indicated in the following table. t RPV 215 psig{RESSURE 2 REGION 60 psig L R E HIGH INTERMEDIATE LOW P V INCREASING Cl-3 Cl-4 Cl-5 V E DECREASING Cl-6 Cl-7 L 1 RPV pressure at which LPCI/LPCS shutoff head (whichever is lower) is reached. 2 RCIC low pressure isolation setpoint. Cl-3 RPV WATER LEVEL INCREASING, RPV PRESSURE HIGH Enter the instruction developed from the RPV Control Guide-lines at Step RC/L. Cl-4 RPV WATER LEVEL INCREASING, RPV PRESSURE INTERMEDIATE If HPCS and RCIC are not available and RPV pressure is in- . creasing, - EMERGENCY RPV DEPRESSURIZATION IS REQUIRED. When RPV pressure is decreasing, enter the instruction developed from the RPV Control Guidelines at Step RC/L. e If HPCS and RCIC are not available and RPV pressure is not increasing, enter the instruction developed from the RPV Control Guidelines at Step RC/L. Otherwise, when RPV water level reaches 177.7 in. (low level scram cetpoint), enter the instruction developed from the RPV
~
Control Guidelines at Step RC/L.
~ C1-5 RPV WATER LEVEL INCREASING, RPV PRESSURE LOW If pressure is increasing, EMERGENCY RPV DEPRESSURIZATION IS
' ' REQUIRED. When RPV pressure 'is decreasing, enter the in-struction developed from the RPV Control Guideline at Step RC/L. Otherwise, enter the instruction developed from the RPV Control Guideline at Step RC/L. Cl-6 RPV WATER LEVEL DECREASING, RPV PRESSURE HIGH OR INTERMEDIATE If HPCS or RCIC is not operating, restart whichever is not 3; operating.
, - u-_ -. . .c . , . . . , . - . _ - _._ ., _. _ ._ _.. _ . _ . . _ _ . . . . _ . _ . - _ - . _ _ - . _ . --
PGP Pagn: 92 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines If no injection subsystem is lined up for injection with at least one pump running, start pumps in alternate injection subsystems which are lined up for injection. When RPV water level drops to 0 in. (top of active fuel):
- 1. If no system, injection subsystem or alternate injection subsystem is lined up with at least one pump running,
' STEAM COOLING IS REQUIRED. Een any system, injection subsystem or alternate injection subsystem is lined up with at least one pump running, return to Step Cl-2.
- 2. Otherwise, EMERGENCY RPV DEPRESSURIZATION IS REQUIRED.
Een RPV water level is increasing or RPV pressure drops below 60 psig (RCIC low pressure isolation setpoint), return to Step Cl-2. Cl-7 RPV WATER LEVEL DECREASING, RPV PRESSURE LOW 7.f HPCS or LPCS are not operating, start pumps in alternate injection subsystems which are lined up for injection. If RPV pressure is increasing, EMERGENCY RPV DEPRESSURIZATION IS REQUIRED. Wen RPV water level drops to 0 in. (top of active fuel), enter instruction developed from CONTINGENCY #4. I D , eew s
PCP Paga: 93 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines CONTINGENCY 2 EMERGENCY RPV DEPRESSURIZATION C2-1 men either: l 13 14 l
- 1. Boron Injection is required and all injection into the RPV except from boron injection systems and CRD has been terminated and prevented, or
- 2. Boron injection is not required, C2-1.1 If suppression pool water level is above 5 f t. 1-3/8 in.
(elevation of top of SRV discharge device):
- 1. Open all ADS valves.
- 2. If any ADS valve cannot be opened, open other SRVs until 8 (number of SRVs dedicated to ADS) valves are open.
C2-1.2 If less than 3 (Minimum Number of SRVs Required for Emergency Depressurization) SRVs are open l 22 l rapidly depressurize the RPV using one or more of the following systems (use in order which will minimize radioactive release to the environment):
- s. Mpin condenser
- b. Turbine driven feedwater pungs
- c. RWCU (recirculation mode) if no boron has been
. injected into the RPV
- d. Main steam line drains e.- RCIC stema line
- f. RWCU (blowdown mode) if no boron has been injected into the RPV
.g. Steam jet air ejectors
- h. Steam condensing mode of RHR If RPV Flooding is required, enter the instruction developed from CONTINGENCY 6.
C2-2 Enter the instruction developed from the RPV Control Guidelines at Step RC/P-3. J L. a
PGP Page: 94 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines . I 1 CONTINGENCY 3 , STEAM COOLING ' _ If while executing this step Emergency RPV Depressurization is required or any system, injection subsystem, or alternate injec-tion subsystem is lined up for injection with at least one pump running, enter the instruction developed from CONTINGENCY 2. C3-1 When RPV water level drops to -112.6 in. (Minimum Zero-Injection RPV Whter Level) or if RPV water level cannot be determined, open one SRV. When RPV pressure drops below 700 psig (Minimum Single SRV Steam Cooling Pressure), enter the instruction developed from CONTINGENCY 2. (
PGP Page: 95 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines CONTINGENCY 4 CORE COOLING WITHOUT LEVEL RESTORATION C4-1 Open all ADS valves. I 13 l If any I.DS valve cannot be opened, open other SRVs until 8 (number of SRVs dedicated to ADS) valves are open. C4-2 Operate HPCS and LPCS subsystems with suction from the suppression pool. When at least one core spray subsystem is operating with suction from the suppression pool and RPV pressure is below 128 psig (RPV pressure for rated LPCS or HPCS flow, whichever pressure is lower), terminate injection into the RPV from sources external to the pri-mary containment. C4-3 When RPV water level is restored to 0 in. (top of active fuel), enter the instruction developed from the RPV Control Guideline at Step RC/L.
PGP Page: 96 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Goidelines CONTINGENCY #5 ALTE N 00 LING (Deleted)
ID~ PGP Page: 97 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines CONTINGENCY 6 RPV FLOODING C6-1 If any control rod is not inserted to or beyond position 02 (maxi-num suberitical banked withdrawal position), flood the RPV as follows: If while executing the following steps:
- 1. RPV water level can be determined, and
- 2. Containment pressure can be maintained below the Primary Containment Design Pressure (Figure 1),
Then:
- 1. If boron has been injected into the RPV, enter the instruction developed from CONTINGENCY 7, and the instruction developed from the RPV Control Guideline at Step RC/P-4 and execute these instructions con-currently.
- 2. If no boron has been injected into the RPV, enter the instruction developed from the RPV Control Guidelines at Steps RC/L and RC/P-4 and execute these steps con-currently.
! C6-1.1 Terminate and prevent all injection into the RPV except from boron injection systems and CRD until RPV pressure is below the Minimum Alternate RPV Flooding Pressure. Minimum Alternate RPV Number of open SRVs Flooding Pressure (psig) 8 87 7 102 6 121 5 149 4 190 3 259 2 396 1 808 If less than 1 (minimum number of SRVs for which the Minimum Alternate RPV Flooding Pressure is below the lowest SRV lif ting pressure) SRVs can be opened, continue in this ins truction.
^
PGP Page: 98 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines C6-1.2 If at least 3 (Minimum Number of SRVs Required for Emergency _,Depressurization) SRVs can be opened, close the MSIVs, main steam line drain valves, RCIC and RHR steam condensing isola-tion valves. C6-1.3 Commence and slowly increase injection into the RPV l with the following systems until at least 1 (minimum l 25 l number of SRVs for which the Minimum Alternate RPV Flooding Pressure is below the lowest SRV lifting pressure) SRV is open and RPV eressure is above the Minimum Alternate RPV Flooding .es sure:
- a. Motor. driven feedwater pumps
- b. Condensate pumps
; c. CRD If at least 1 (minimum number of SRVs for which the Minimum Alternate RPV Flooding Pressure is below the lowest SRV lif ting pressure) SRV is not open or RPV pressure cannot be increased to above the Minimum Alternate RPV Flooding Pres-sure, commence and slowly increase injection into the RPV I with the following systems until at least 1 (minimum number of SRVs for which the Minimum Alternate RPV Flooding Pressure is below the lowest SRV lif ting pressure) SRV is open and RPV pressure is above the Minimum Alternate RPV Flooding Pressure:
- a. HPCS
- b. LKS c.. LPCI .
- d. RER - emergency service water crosstie
- e. Fire system
- f. ECCS keep-full systems
- g. SIC (test tank)
- h. SLC (boron tank)
- 1. Suppression pool cleanup
- j. Condensate transfer C6-1.4 Control injection to maintain at least 1 (minimum number of SRVs for which the Minimus Alternate RPV Flooding Pressure is
, below the lowest SRV lif ting pressure) SRV opens and RPV pressure above the Minimum Alternate RPV Flooding Pressure but as low as practicable.
C6-1.5 , men all control rods are inserted to or beyond position 02 (maximum subcritical banked withdrawal position), continue in this instruction.
' C6-2 If at least 3 (Minimum Number of SRVs Required for Emergency De-pressurisation) SRVs can be opened or if a HPCS or notor driven feedwater pump is available for injection, close the MSIVs, main steam line drain valves, RCIC and RHR stema condensing isolation valves. .
PGP Page: 99 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines C6-3 If RPV water level can not be determined, flood the RPV as follows: If while executing the following steps RPV water level can be determined, continue in this instruction at Step C6-4. C6-3.1 Commence and increase injection into the RPV with the following systems until at least 3 (Minimum Number of SRVs Required for Energency Depressurization) SRVs are open and RPV pressure is not decreasing and is 130 psig (Minimum RPV Flooding Pressure) or more above containment pressure:
- a. HPCS
- b. Motor driven feedwater pump
- c. LPCS
- d. LPCI
- e. Condensate pumps
- f. C RD
- g. RHR-emergency service water crosstie
- h. Fire System
- 1. ECCS keep-full systems J. SLC (test tank)
- k. SLC (boron tank)
- 1. Suppression pool cleanup
- m. Condensate transfer C6-3.2 Control injection to maintain at least 3 (Minimum Number of SRVs Required For Emergency Depressurization) SRVs open and l RPV pressure at least 130 psig (Minimum RPV Flooding Pressure) above suppression chamber pressure but as low as practicable.
, C6-3.3 When:
- 1. RPV water level instrumentation is available, and
- 2. Temperature is below 212*F, and
- 3. Containment pressure is below the Primary Containment i Design Pressure Increase injection into the RPV until at least 3 (Minimum Number of SRVs Required for Emergency Depressurization) SRVs are open.
C6-3.4 Control injection to maintain at least 3 (Minimum Number of SRVs Required for Emergency Depressurization) SRVs open. C6-3.5 When the Minimum Core Flooding Interval (Figure 2) has elapsed, terminate all injection into the RPV and reduce RPV water level. i.
PGP Page: 100 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines C6-3.6 If RPV water level indication is not restored within the Maxi-mum Core Uncovery Time Limit (Figur'e 3) af ter commencing ter-mination of injection into the RPV, return to Step C6-3. C6-3.7 Enter the instruction developed from the RPV Control Guideline at Steps RC/L and RC/P-4 and execute these instructions con-currently. If while executing the following steps RPV water level cannot be determined, continue in this instruction at Step C6-3. C6-4 If RPV water level can be determined, flood the RPV as follows: C6-4.1 Commence and increase injection into the RPV with the following systems until RPV water level is increasing:
- a. HPCS
- b. Motor driven feedwater pump
- c. LPCS
- d. LPCI
- e. Condensate pumps
- f. CRD
- g. RHR - emergency service water crosstie
- h. Fire System
- 1. ECCS keep-full systems
- j. SLC (test tank)
- k. SLC (boron tank)
- 1. Suppression pool cooling
- m. Condensate transfer C6-4.2 Control injection to maintain RPV water level increasing.
C6-4.3 When containment pressure can be maintained below .the Primary Containment Design Pressure, enter the instruction developed from the RPV Control Guidelines at Steps RC/L and RC/P-4 and execute these instructions concurrently.
,,, ,y. ~,, . . , . . , _ _ _ , .- ~
PGP Page: 101 Attachment 6 (Cont.)
% -- -,.-- i ; . : -Perry-S, p.ec, 4fieyech-
,. ._i,- i i i i i
- i i i ii- i I - : ,
t 7, i i t n.' il el i_I
' 6
! a
, tI t i 'i) t i !'
- i. ' t4
- t. nical Guidelines 8
I t
- a
, 4 i e ! __
i t i t I i l t i Cdntninet1Cv 6.' Fiaura 1 : I i ' ' i8 .ii! ! ' ' ' i i
! i t . >
i i . i - i . . . i i i i i : i , - i , i f f i . y i , 4 f j ) ' l 8 i l i ) i l l l 6 l ee i 6 4
' f I
- 4 4 , , f I e $ i l s 6 I l 3 I i t I t
' l I h f
! I t $ g ! e l f $
I
' *' t '
i i ! i ' i
}
d i ' ' ' ' iiit + . -R A ' I i
- I t
- o- ._
i i i I i ,ii : i - i i l i e ! i + 4-s...,.. ~s o'i c y JQ
% s. J .i i : i . , I i e e i
- am i t i e i i + ' . 6
- i
- 4 4 '
( 4 h h i h l 0 I I l h t
, e , e e i i . .
- t i i e i i
Miit i i le
- i
- i i i t t
' i pZg*
w t t tr i i p- 6
- i i
i e i t
- w-U.
g _ff) g i I ' t
' ,E t t ,I i g-@ g i h
, ' l l i i i ' . ' '
.J - d y _,, g i v '
o_> e W i , i i > i , i i , ,
.J Z Q
i '
, u s i , , , e , s i f a r i _
, . i -
i *
- i ' I g
. i i . 4 .
w _ gg F-
,jg e + 1 i
- t ! ,
, i i I l I 1 i
8
. i l t i
(_o j l ' I
- i I '
i ;;; . i - F___.Z
. A _ j_ i t 2 lAJ i . %__
- .g" '_~ E - ---
._ z_
T l*-
- u. _
so _
-- Qb.
F-2-Z i . O ,__o O O A t i i . ' i ' ' ' gg ,_ .
, e i s i a s i e '
M -
, i , ,
e i I i , e i 4
- O ~E-
' at _
E
; , , . i e + , . M i
, . Q. -
c . . -g. m -
=
n y. , .,.q n w
.. - = * ' * * * * = * * * * * * - '
_. e e ab ew @=4.Es 6** 6 M* 6 '"" ' ' 6 96 $*-- - - gmg, 6.e e se e.p sb
,e e le 6 8
- g . ( ,
we 4,m esmee mes
- e e. *_ met 4 w . go.am ese em as.ee> =.
. ..__ .. __ .3. . w -ee . . _ ___.g.__ _. i,, _ . _ . . _ . _ . _ . _ - . . _ , ... _ . . .r g 79
['. he 8 % e . ., , , . _ . . .. . _ . .. . .- - ~ = = m - . . e e.
-esp. @. e e e.ee. g.w is9 _'
- g g gg y O#8 ## '
,g4y n .y.e m =.._ . geGe . . # ** T' # **"**#
g e 6 ** *" " g , ,
,e .,., as e + ar e .-owe o en - em - e4**
- e, , ,
.g w *
- h
PGP Page: 102 Attachment 6 (Cont.)
-~~ '
Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines Qre Flooding Interval
' ' , p%YSTEb 15 0 14 0
,(, _
3 SRVS 13 0 12 0
, .no 1 )
]<
10 0
$ 90 E-80 10 '
w \
\
{o 60
, 50 40
\s
'~ 30
\ , '
0 8 SRVS
\
\
10 ' ~ w_ ., ..q.y y-0 0 50 10 0 o 200 250 300 350 400 450 W ., Q.:is RPy PRES 5URE (PSIG)
PGP Page: 103 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines Contingency 6, Figure 3 4.. , r ,s 9 . i ! 4 1 1 i
**ia os g * *i - i - i i ei i 6 , . 6 .
- 0 . $' F494 I f D 4, d ' i & l r a
, , . . . ., ,4 e, ;*
3 4 s 4. o. , e r 4 . 3 ., , , 6 a, , 3. , , .
._:. L _ s : ? . U t. % = :Ar .=.pt:*d-ba=.:= s y r [ to e : :.2 - a qt' Ta r .:.; ::1 2 - . .. . _.....J . E sa
- f f ! i o'
4 { -'--
.e i i
. +-
# t. .= e- - - -
1 i 6 y z s -g ---t _ W- r i kd :ic L 6:.. a.4 L e 4.i ' g r : L a 1-- -
- z r
. . _ . . . : e+-i . :.-,j g g s.q - .1-L g. f e._: 3-+,i q g- g- _ c - q4.+ . .i .
i see.. e-s 6 b .z- e. l_.. s a_ t u s . a_ %s; rr-E rs e, > , s- ..- ,__.,7 g - s. - ~ e .e_ y. n . . - -- , a.e. J q , . ;1 ^ .'- d a.u -=s.L' x w a-=__ i w k_.-' = _ q _;it p =_s w g: ?.=1;+:- _ r i._@~ rL -MM :gr.:. y:.- ~ i.z ..= g sa i % ts- 3- . . _ -E' "- tH:E45=Is E-+ .t====tN._ ,_-8_=-_ . !!i=M=--5=_-*=._F0 _ _ . . __ . . _ . .N_ _ , __~ 'u~"==W'=i *" ,_____;____ M = -@-f t-m _:=_Cd_. ___ _ ed 3b g.- s , . ;.- 2 4 -------._._q_ __- 2_ M-Z O A, - c) r , .. ed 3 3
- 1 g .; -
.wa 91 y m . _m._ c x re ue 6 -- a 1*rr 4 -1 .qc- -
- _ - w;
.t) ". N ai -- - - - Q .- 1 .. 7 = 4 -,e._ n.. - -2 si g < ~ . s. : 7 u. s W,- s4.e i_ m v F _ + -t : i - :4 ma.urM . '. _= r a-y r.a.. .& = - . g - ' =-- - -~- ~ _ . - ::= :- -
- m. - _# s- r-- w ,- 9 4na . .- A _ u -. x _ . . . . *.
- e. .+ r_ . . , - ~
4 - _ ._ ,+ i . _a._ . 4s e.m + r6 + 1 '.; m n_'< _a i .ag. .g '. ._. e+ . =, A-s - n e .m e c--.w-- shn % zM w m.-i ' %r d a&_ _ ' i u -hw u h s. _ .I 9 3 v.Y+;_.df k :fa ,1 %.+2=_-:-. = :Q M- -- - ? -- Qi=..& =zL ?;=g 5x _Y-). ~.; ^. Ei-ki - t al -{_ k--> g *rW -L* y %;n.(bree. . -tf-d-5R "'-"5*M-f 9'E:f Ml!#i! - iM:.h=_ abM= . __ii:lif .Kk 55:? T" ( C E_-._ . -- -_-t;->=-st-#i_ _ , _- iu- ~-- v t --__4 u =-~'a= = - _ _ ,_ .___ =__- --~_u_g_;_____.;._- g g , - _ . . . - - - _ - .} Y i o \ < W '\ ; , C [. ";:T- -! 1 .., , , n-- ,1. , , , - - , , - im . . _ . , , k agl' s . - . . . .- s . r. .m -r .m ._-, . , - - . , . . y .@_ + , - + #.. ,-.r_.i 7 ,, y. a....L.. < . u_ x 4-mw . . .a c. m .m .u.m. e p.y j e- i,a : g- . p 4 ,g2 a ra ,,_n, . .,, . . r. . z _% =& , .-. _= = _=.=i 1- u -. l . w . f_- . . eu a -n s . i .r E.c . 4 .,M.. 1. < u i. . . m i LA. .g_.. - - . .. . .. . . . . .g-_. , 4 4 ..-- ..m 4m _m .c r , % w ._ -%. m, i-e- . e m .n- 3 r -wr m , __ r. y 3 * % C F:.T._- ' - 6- 2 M.;t _ ;+ MY ;**_ U f *' F W h e ? 'mF" w '* i ' @*d ' F 4 m * ' - 7 * = - -' *!+ - ~**#AC*#!-**"*'-"#-** '-E *NE* 4 ~* *#' # **' **~~**N 2- - 5"" 2 '+ #' E-Y I "* -d # ~'
- i - '^^*I- -i h, um v v~ =h u mt==- +ms-==t-VM =5 : :- h :k T--% '=4.-D -h =%rk -- r:t . _._
_ + <.+=-:=+ g N I ~--i* N~ _bbN~1~ h b-N- ; _C_ ~~E~~N .. . . . _ . _ _ _ . __ D .'.~[N!:b[*Nn_S5~b-55=_d.,h-_;._...___;_ _ . _ . .___ _ -ENM~.M _ . . _ _ _ , 2t.r -_. __ ._____5___=--_ -f .- 1.. = t- -.__.4 4 ? . O 9 , i g - -r
- i
@ i e e n . , s - * - g S- { . 5 { . 4 _ B l4 s 9 3 3 t a f . 6 $ 8 r :- -a.~s=.1e .L: q 6p q. .m. v p.a ra a a s . :. . .. g . _ 1 i p.t g :- e g. n . t- .y 7 f- ., s gy, ,-if a W
- e ,
, .e- . - s z - 6n , s s_s - + v a r I_ . . s . s e r
- s. ; et
- r i 2 : l . a L,i.i . } i 2. 4. . 4 4 : e- im
- 4 . . . -( t
. ; .r p.. { a ? . ) . + ti ~j d (I Nr.kj r j.L. [ . .a ; - - 4 . - + . r[. *l ; 2; ' L1 :7. ...L .: ;...;. =; ..n U * . q c a ;. . : ;. n :.: _:.a. f.r--- r;.._t:_ - ;
- Lt . 2.2. :-
- .;; .: ; ;. .. .;.:..r;
.; 4 _ .r.;' .* . . : .. g.... '".. n. .=. ". ; .*!_:. . ;I . . . . ~. * . w . ,+f.e . . . _ . . . 4. . . _ . . e.me.=e..m.p.. ... 4 e waw e.e.ep *- am e . **.e. . em.4 ...e__ e - e.. e 1..e .en._~.-...6......-e..e.._mg ..e... .e. .,e....we. .a_ . . .. . .. .; .. e. .a t . e _. m - - . . . . .% . 4 ,-.. . a e 45=f k 3;WE: TT= UJ.MNi@ BWil 3Wil WMOONn WM WnNWW 1 l PGP Page: 104 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines CONTINGENCY 7 LEVEL / POWER CONTROL If while executing the following steps:
- 1. RPV water level cannot be determined, RPV FLOODING IS REQUIRED; enter the instruction developed from CONTINGENCY 6.
- 2. RPV Flooding is required, enter the instruction developed from CONTINGENCY 6.
C7-1 If:
- 1. Reactor power is above 5% (APRM downscale trip) or cannot be determined, and
- 2. Suppression pool temperature is above 110*F, and
- 3. Either an SRV is open or opens or drywell pressure is above 1.68 psig (high drywell pressure scram setpoint),
Then: 4 1. If any MSIV is open, bypass low RPV water level MSIV isolation interlocks, and
- 2. Lower RPV water level by terminating and preventing i all injection into the RPV except from boron l 26 l injection systems and CRD until either:
- a. Reactor power drops below 5% (APRM downscale trip), or l-L b. RPV water level reaches 0 in. (Flow Stagnation Water Level), or
- c. All SRVs remain closed and drywell pressure remains below
!L 1.68 psig (high drywell pressure scram setpoint). If while executing the following steps Emergency RPV Depressuri-zation is required, continue in this instruction at Step C7-2.1. i g PGP Page: 105 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines If while executing the following steps: , 1. Reactor power is above 5% (APRM downscale trip) or can-not be determined, and
- 2. RPV water level is above 0 in. (Flow Stagnation Water Level), and
- 3. Suppression pool temperature is above 110*F, and
~' ~~ "
- 4. Either an SRV is open or opens or drywell pressure is above 1.68 psig (high drywell pressure scram setpoint, return to Step C7-1.
I C7-2 Maintain RPV weter level either: l 9, 10, 11, 25 l
- 1. If RPV water level was deliberately lowered in Step C7-1, at the level to which it was lowered, or
- 2. If RPV water level was not deliberately lowered in Step C7-1,
, between 177.7 in. (low level scram setpoint) and 219.5 in. (high level trip setpoint).
- with the following systems
- 1. Condensate /feedwater system 1450 - O psig (RPV pressure range for system operation)
- 2. . CRD system 1990 - O psig (RPV pressure range for system opera-
+ tion)
- 3. RCIC system 1177 - 60 psig (RPV pressure range for system operation) I 12 l If RPV water level cannot be so maintained, maintain RPV water level above 0 in. (top of active fuel) with these systems.
If RPV vater level cannot be maintained above 0 in. (top of sctive fuel), EMERGENCY RPV DEPRESSURIZATION IS REQUIRED. C7-2.1 Terminate and prevent all injection into the RPV except from boron injection systems and CRD until RPV pressure is below J the Minimum Alternate RPV Flooding Pressure. J e -) o' PCP Page: 106 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines Minimum Alternate RPV Number of open SRVs Flooding Pressure (psig) 8 87 7 102 6 121 5 149 4 190 3 259 2 396 1 808 If less than 1 (minimum number of SRVs for which the Minimum ' ~ Alternate RPV Flooding Pressure is below the lowest SRV lif ting pressure) SRVs can be opened, continue in this instruction. C7-2.2 Commence and slowly increase injection into the RPV with the following systems to restore and main- l 25 l tain RPV water level above 0 in. (top of active fuel):
- a. Condensate /feedwater system
- b. CRD
- c. RCIC If RPV water level cannot be restored and maintained above 0 in. (top of active fuel), commence and slowly increase in-jection into the RPV with the following systems to restore
- and maintain RPV water level above 0 in. (top of active fuel):
l [ a. HPCS
- b. LMS ,
- c. LPCI
- d. RHR - emergency service water crosatie
- e. Fire System
- f. -ECCS keep-full systems
- g. SLC (test tank)
- h. SLC (boron tank)
- 1. Suppression pool cleanup
- j. Condensate transfer If while executing the following step reactor power commences and continues to increase, return to Step C7-1.
' C7-3 When 315 pounds -(Hot Shutdown Boron Weight) of boron have been injected or all control rods are inserted to or beyond position 02 (maximum suberitical banked withdrawal position), restore and main-tain RPV water level between 177.7 in. (low level scram setpoint) and 219.5 in. Otigh level trip setpoint). r ,.n,- ~-w.,- - - , , . , . , .-,,--,-en. ,w - , - ,- - -,-,.-m,-. , - - . - . - - ~m., ne, - - - . , ~ , _ , e PGP Page: 107 Attachment 6 (Cont.) Perry Specific Tech-nical Guidelines - LAST If RPV mter level cannot be restored and maintained above 177.7 in. (low level scram setpoint), maintain RPV water level above 0 in. (top of active fuel). If RPV water level cannot be maintained above 0 in. (top of active fuel), ENERGENCY RPV DEPRESSURIZATION IS REQUIRED; return to Step C7-2.1. C7-4 When ONI-C71 is entered from the instruction developed from the RPV Control Guidelines at Step RC/P-5, proceed to cold shutdown in accordance with ONI-C71. t 9 b - .. - , - . .-. , - - - . . , , , , -- . - , - - - , , . , n,,-- .,. , ,+ 4 -. PGP Page: 108 , - Attachment 7
- _ Deviations from the Generic Guidelines i
e l _. 4 i-4 4 i 4 Attachment 7 to the PGP p Deviations from the Generic Guidelines (- ~ + 4 i 4 4 1 S- t l PGP Page: 109 ,. Attachment 7 (Cont.) i Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 1 EPG Step Number (s): Table 1 - EPG Abbreviations PSGT Step Number (s): Table 1 - PSTG Abbreviations Deviation: Abbreviation for Rod Control and Information System added. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Abbreviation used in CAUTION 20. a 4 s. 4 Reviewer: C. S. Orbavany Date: 11/16/84
- _ Approved
- YES NO h (circle one)
. NDAS Lead Engineer Date: ! -' Approved: h NO (circla one) CSO: / /{ />Asn . Date: J2/20/f4 . Incorporated: e ef v Date: et/2</f/ ?' UQ i z. PGP Page: 110 Attachment 7 (Cont.) t Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 2 EPG Step Number (s): Table 1 . ..~... . . - - PSGT Step Number (s): Table 1 Deviation: Abbreviation for Rod Sequence Control System was removed. s Evaluator: C.-S. Oroavany Date: 11/16/84 ' Justification: - Perry design does not incorporate a Rod Sequence Control System. Reviewer: C. S. Oroavany Date: 11/16/84-Approved: YES' NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved h NO (circle one) GSO: ,4$ Y W hb/ ,- > Date: /2/2ckc/ Incorporated: hete . Date: /2/4 /N oo 9 s -t 3 PGP Page: 111 : Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the s . Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 3 EPG Step Number (s): CAUTION 1 . . . PSGLStep Number (s): CAUTION 1 and elsewhere Deviation: . _, ._ , Symbol "#" was removed. ~ m. - Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Symbol "#" is used by convention at Perry to designat's where unitized . equipment is being referenced. Removed for human factor consideration. I 4 [.d. /) - Ctb*W , , Reviever: Date: 14/M/84 t2/i'lj Pt ' Approved: h, NO .N/R ~ (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: 4 . J++ A Date: /2/te/W Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: M J[ , Date: nmo /e W . Incorporated!' str \ / Date: /t 4/ # 0 e 0 - - . ..s-.-,. n.. .e-- , - , .-,.. ,,- , _ ..-n--,,c - ~ _ ._,.-,..nn- ,n- we,vs. - , , - - - - e PGP Page: 112 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 4 .: EPG Step Number (c): CAUTION 5 and elsewhere ' PSGT Step Number (s): CAUTION 5 and elsewhere Deviation: Technical Specification Surveillance Instructions (SVIs) referenced will be used to determine bulk suppression pool water temperature, drywell - atmosphere average temperature, and containment atmosphere average tem-perature. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Perry specific instructions for these purposes. Where specific instruc-tion numbers are known, they will be referenced by number in order to aid the preparers of the PEls. Reviewer: k Mv v Date: /l /6 6/ t Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: YES NO (circle one) GSO: lW /b>t - Date: /2-l20 W Incorporated: [ arm. Dater / /H -v o j' PGP Page: 113 , := Attachmen t 7 (Con t .) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines . Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 5 EPG Step Number (s): CAUTION 6 PSGT Step Number (s): CAUTION 6 Deviation: , .\ + . CAUTION 6 is marked "Later". I e N 1;; .t f Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Uncertainties in the calculational methodology have prevented finali- .h< zation of this table. This will be addressed when the PEIs are prepared. ' ' ~ 'O. ..,, .y A e p 3 / Reviewer: /T ' e u. /- -7 f Date: /J-[/d/8V Approved: @ 1 NO N/R (circle one) nI M NDAS Lead Engineer: [ I. Date: /Z//o/N yproved: @ NO (circ 1e oee) GSO:' . N4A$n , f& Date: flkobo Incorporated: 8 M .e m - Date: et M/ <> d b
- s. '
lf 4; N^ g. PGP i Page: 114 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 6 EPG Step Number (s): CAUTION 7 _ _ PSGT _ Step Number (s): N/A Deviation: . . . . _ _ . . . CAUTION 7 was removed. , Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: , Perry design does not utilize heated reference leg instruments. Reviewer: a., .M i Date: /& 7 [ Approved: ~ NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: [8. A ~ Date: /?Me/rY Approved: h NO (circle ' one) GSO: / /472yjr _ Date: /2)20 Y / / f Incorporated: '[// m, Date: ' /t/u/# dO i - l 4 --y w -e. - ,,,--,--,--.-,...m-- --- -~-- we.,,,,v-, nwe-.---- ,,.-,--r--. ,--.m-v.e---,-.-..------,-- . _ - . .-. . _ - _ . . ._ .._-. .. ~. _ _ PGP Page: 115 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 7 EPG Step Number (s): CAUTION 8 PSGT Step Number (s): CAUTION 8 Deviation: Perry specific curves for NPSH requirements for the RCIC pump when taking suction from the suppression pool used in place of EPG curves. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 l- Justification: Reference Perry Specific calculation 11016-29 Rev. O. Only the RCIC pump .g . ._ . _ _ .o m,..... . . . . , _ , . . ter NPSH problems at any suppression pool temperatures with containment pressure between 0 pois and 15 psig. Note: This and other calculations are available for inspection at the Perry site, but 'are not included in the PGP. Reviewer: I, Date: G ltm Mt _ v Approved: h NO N/R (circle one) . NDAS Lead Engineer: - d Date: /2/20/W . Approved: @ s. NO (circle one) ' GSO: - W/u{hM17v _ [ Date: /2thosCW Incorporated: ( 00 .m, Date: / d[/4 . - ,c.-~,- , , .,-,m ,w-,- - - - . - - , - , , . , - - ,-,,--,,-.,.--,,-r,-.,.-.,,,-r- a.--en-c ..,----w. ,--n,. PGP Page: 116 Attachnent 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 8 EPG Step Number (s): CAUTION 9 _ PSGI Step Number (s): CAUTION 9 Deviation: Perry specific value for suppression pool high level interlock used in place of EPG value. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference GE documents 22A3131AS Rev. 3, and 22A6089AA, Rev. 5. Reviewer: I Date: n/nl% Approved: NO N/R (circle one) l NDAS Lead Engineer: Y((/[2 Date: /J/y/N l Approved: h NO (circle one) GSO: / Aw _ ] Date: /d/ o Incorporated: [/h,rm Date: /Z/a[# 0 0 i 1 PGP Page: 117 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 9 EPG Step Number (s): CAUTION 9 i,. PSGT Step Number (s): CAUTION 9 Deviation: l Perry specific value for condensate storage tank low level interlock used in place of EPG value. . Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany- Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference draft Technical Specification Table 3.3.3-2. l t r l l Reviewer: Date: n!nl49 Approved: h NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: [M[d Date: /2///*/W Approved: NO (circle one) i/ . ,
- l. GSO: $m W/a/wrns /h Date: /2/?c/f,V Incorporated: # /04.m, '
Date: e d/# oo l PGP Page: 118 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 10 EPG Step Number (s): CAUTION 10 PSGT Step Number (s): CAUTION 10 Deviation: Last two sentences were removed. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: The making of frequent checks and the restoration to AUTO are inappro-priate actions for a CAUTION. d - Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany _ Date: 11/16/84 i< Approved: YES NO h (circle one) -NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: - Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: /f/ / Date: /?both/ [/Ibun/f ~ Incorporated: Date: / t/u/H c <> 6 4 1 w -, v w v r w,-- ,,w__'w+,+ v,-,, ,.wc- -,,-,--p,-m- - < , , g--c,-,v - -- g-,9%, ,-e ,---%+-.-vw- w-- --m-- --y e -% e -g g-= PGP Page: 119 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generii Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 11 EPG Step Number (s): CAUTION 11 and elsewhere CAUTION 11; RPV Control Guidelines - Entry Condi-PSGT Step Number (s): tion 3; Primary Containment Control Guideline - Entry Condition 4; C7-1 Deviation: Perry specific value for drywell high pressure scram setpoint used in place of EPG value. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: __ 11/16/84 Justification: , Reference draf t Technical Specification Table 2.2.1-1. i ! Reviewer: - 14,](_ Date:' /2 //7!d , <1 l tj Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Y 9 / M /f Date: 4#d/I/ Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: / /hittw sis Date: /dkcih/ Incorporated: //div Date: et[u/H z oo L PGP Page: 120 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 12 . EPG Step Number (s): CAUTION 11 PSGT Step Number (s): CAUTION 11 Deviation: Last sentence deleted. l-
- Evaluator
- C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification:
The restoration to Auto / Standby is inappropriate for a CAUTION. l l l I Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 . Approved: YES NO h (cirele one) l .'NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: h NO (circle one) L GSO: / W f & Date: }2)bo W / Incorporated: [ [ Iur ,' Date: r*/tr/H L o() e I ~ - . ,, .m _ -. . . - . ___..,.,_;,_..____......,.___~_..-._.__.._..,._,_..- l l PGP Page: 121 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the I Generic Guidelines l I ) Deviation Shaat: Numbe r 13 1 l EPG Step Number (s): CAUTION 12 l PSGT Step Number (s): CAUTION 12 l Deviation: Perry specific value for RCIC turbine minimum speed limit used in place - I l of EPG value. l I l l l l l l Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 L Justification: Reference Perry Steam Turbine manual VPF-3622-165-1 pg. 5-8. Reviewer: Id.h [ Date: lili,IN Approved: 0 N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead' Engineer: I (( Z Date: /2/ d// ,/ )1 Approved: ' YES NO (circle one) GSO: W! n, _ Date: )?/be k'/ -Incorporated: 4/h,rm , _ Date: /t v/N 0 .6- - _ . , . . - _ - - . - - _ , . . . , - .,-..._--.--~-.,,-,_.-.,,,,,c-- ~ . - - - , . , , _ - , . . . PGP Page: 122 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 14 EPG Step Number (s): CAUTION 13 and elsewhere PSGT Step Number (s): CAUTION 13; CAUTION 17; RC/P-3 Deviation: EPG value for RPV cooldown rate LCO verified correct for Perry. l Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 i ' Justification: Reference draft Technical Specification - 3.4.6.1.b. Reviewer: -- amofk,j-Date: /2//7!s*/ i a _' Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Y (( Z .Date: M// /dV Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: WE />No Date: /zlteky Incorporated: hbr,, Date: /s./u/W 00 ? ~\ ) PGP Page: 123 l' Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 15 ; EPG Step Number (s): CAUTION 14 and elsewhere PSGT Step Number (s): CAUTION 14; Cl-2; Cl-6 1 Deviation: Perry specific value for RCIC low pressure isolation setpoint used in place of EPG value. i Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: . ReferenceG.E.designspecificationdatasbeet22A3735AD,Rev.3, item 3.1.6.10. Reviewer: mad Date: /1//7ff'/- . i I Approved: NO ' N/R (circle one) 'NDAS Lead Engineer: MM, d Date: /7////N Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: f d,{m Date: /2/EalGT/ Incorporated: 8/$nn, Date: / ub1 oo e, - 4---- , nr.-,-- -,-..,,og,,,,%..m_ ,,wm,,%---.-*,.-mu,,,,_.,--e.g-w7~r,,_,-yy_,.<,y.y,m,-w-~.-y,y-4,~.+y. PGP Page: 124 Attachment 7 (Cont.) . Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 16 EPG Step Number (s): CAUTION 15 PSGT Step Number (s): CAUTION 15 Deviation:
- SRV opening sequence specified in PSTG.
r . 5 i Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 I l - Justification: i The following criteria were used in selecting the SRV opening sequence:
- a. distribute heat addition load to suppression pool;
- b. avoid additional challenges to SRVs which perform the ADS function.
l Reference 304-025, 026, 027 and 028, revisions K, H, N, and E i l respectively. -Reviewer: dbd -Date: /A//7/T9f Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: M M Date: #[/MY Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: / s/ aC. A., Date: /JIo V _Inco rated: f/hmm/ Date: /t zlh' OO PGP l Page: 125 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines f Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 17 EPG Step Number (s): CAUTION 16
- PSGT Step Number (s)
- CAUTION 16 _
Deviation: Phrase " ventilation system and" was removed. 1 Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: I Steam tunnel cooling system (M47) at Perry does not automatically start on low RPV water level, therefore there are no interlocks to bypass. Reference M47 system elementary print 208-139 sheets 1 and 2, Rev. D and l M47 System Design Description dated 9/8/82. i. Reviewer: M ,k Date: /A /7 Ya/ (j- - i t l Approved: YES NO . N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: (( I Date: / #I'N8'
- - Approved
- s NO (circle one)
GSO: W dh w Date: /Efl0 V l Incorporated: (1/d,rn,- Date: / u/ ao t l l .- _ . . - - . _ . . . , , ,,-,...,-_,,,,.,,-,-,-.-,_,,-m, . PGP Page: 126 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number _18 EPG Step Number (s): CAUTION 18 PSGT Step Number (s): CAUTION 18 Deviation: Step was reworded. J s ( Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: EPG wording was ambiguous. PSTG wording is more explicit about prohibit-ing diversion of any RHR pump that is required to assure adequate core cooling. l l-
- Reviewer
- C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 l
-Approved: YES .NO h (circle one) l NDA5 Lead. Engineer: Date: Approved: h NO (circle one) GSO: [ er v x Date: /2 20 / / f - Incorporated: (( Mf Date: st/u[N OO w -- -n-- ,-v,, ,,.,,-,,.,-=----,..-.,,-.r..y . - , . . w., .,e---,,,,,.e,.--e-, ,--,,a-.m,...n- ...w.-~,-m.,,-..m- --w,-. ~w , PGP Page: 127 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 19 EPG Step Number (s): CAUTION 19 PSGT Step Number (s): CAUTION 19 Deviation: EPG value for SLC punip trip on low tank level verified correct for Perry. .. _.. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference GE document 22A6093AA Rev. 5, items 4.2.1 and 4.8.1.1. f, 1 4 Reviewer: * ,= g d Date: /2 .//7,[74 Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: [M Z Date: />MM/ Approved: NO (circle one) b~ ~ GSO: lV ( us'su _ n, Date: /2 buff / Incorporated: [M ,em , Date: / ubf oo rf- -?m,. - g 3 - yw,a s , . - ---3 -9 ,-y ,ee , we,,.-,-g w-y - ,--.7,e gy eap-p,9w.w y%%.,3 --.#pp empw-,.w..,wpy.9%,, ,9%-w.y -. - - _ _ . _ ~ _. 4 PGP Page: 128 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 20 EPG Step Number (s): CAUTION 20 PSGT Step Number (s): CAUTION 20 Deviation: Reference to RSCS changed to RCIS. '! valuator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Perry design does not utiliza on RSCS. This function is performed by l' RCIS. l l l [ >. Reviewer: 4 4- 7 Date: /2[/7 / f Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: e ,d. Date: 8/#/M Approved: .NO (circle one) GSO: / ,/[ o s Date: /2/do 4 / / r !- , Incorporated : 8 /de,/ ' Date: - /t[u by 0Q l l t I ', . . . . _ _ . , _ _ . . . . _ . . . . . _ _ . _ _ . , . . . . . . . _ . - . - . ~ _ . . _ , _ . , _ _ . . _ _ _ . . . _ , - . , _ . _ . _ . . . . . . _ . _ - . . _ . . . , - . , . . _ , i PGP Page: 129 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines t Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 21 . EPG Step Number (s): CAUTION 21 and elswhere PSGT Step Number (s): CAUTION 21 and elsewhere Deviation: Perry ' specific term "contaittaent" used in place of EPG term " suppression chambe r". Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: ?- The Mark III design at Perry does not utilize a suppression chamber -separate from the containment. ._, I i-i : Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO Q (circle one) 'NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: h NO (circle one) GSO: k dx etyn v. Date: /2 /Z o k / ' Inco rated: $ haw, .Date: 1lu N 00 e .---n., -re.- - -- - . PGP Page: 130 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 22 EPG Step Number (s): CAUTION 23 PSGT Step Number (s): N/A Deviation: Caution 23 was removed. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 1 Justification: Not applicable to Mark III containments. Referred to drywell spray system tdhich is not used at Perry. Similar to Deviation Sheet 83. Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: h NO (circle one) GSO: / art ,, , Date: JLib 0 l l . Incorporated: [Mw00 Date: /2at/1 e- ,. ,--,.--c, ., g _ . , , . . , - - %-. ... , ,w,,,,_m_..#w.,,-e-rr *w*v* *e -v=w*+-=+-&e- T v * *w w e-* "*****-'wre t-----+--+-Fw'~* PGP Page: 131 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 23 EPG Step Number (s): CAUTION 24 PSGT Step Number (s): N/A Deviation: Caution 24 was removed. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: This CAUTION is used only in the EPG Secondary Containment Control Guide-line, which is not applicable to Perry (see Deviation Sheet Number 101) . _ > l. L Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 . Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: ~ ' Approved: h NO (circle one) GSO: k / NYw ' Date: )?.b o W Incorporated: f/Ibarry Date: st[v[# oo N PGP Page: 132 , Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines i Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 24 EPG Step Number (s): RPV Control Guideline - Purpose; and elsewhere PSGT Step Number (s): RPV Control Guideline - Purpose; and elsewhere Deviation: Items listed in EPG's were marked with bullets (*). PSTGs numbered these , - iteaa. 4 i Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany- Date: 11/16/84 Justification: ! Numbering these items makes it easier to reference them. t 1 Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 ^ - Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: . I . Approved: h NO (circle one)
- f. ' GSO:
hf /w Date: /2./20 Incorporated: [//h.rn,! Date: n[v N d6 PGP Page: 133 Attachment 7 (Cont.) . Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 25 EPG Step Number (s): RPV Control Guidelines - Purpose PSGT Step Number (s): RPV Control Guidelines - Purpose 3 Deviation: Perry specific value for minimum RPV water temperature used in place of EPG value. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 , Justification: Reference draft Technical Specification 3.4.6.1. i II Reviewer: e .4, Date: /2// 7 [f'/ (_ ,y i - Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: [// / Date: ////3'/r'v' Approved: YES NO. (circle one) -GSO: / / { x, Date: JZ kC/!4' (/dn- , ( Incori, orated: Date:
- t</f/
O6 t PGP Page: 134 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviaticns from the _ Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 26 EPG Step Number (s): RPV Control Guidelines - Purpose PSGT Step Number (s): RPV Control Guidelines - Purpose 3 Deviation: Perry specific value for maximum RPV water temperature in cold shutdown used in place of EPG value. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference draf t Technical Specification Table 1.2. Reviewer: M um.,d, - Date: / A- !/ 7/T"4 i Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS' Lead Engineer: II(( g Date: A>/l//W Approved: M> NO (circle one) CSO: W f h fh g Y , Date: /2 /bokW Incorporated: f/hnm,- Date: / t[u H "O PGP Page: 135 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 27 EPG Step Number (s): RPV Control Guideline - Entry Condition; and elsewhere PSGT Step Number (s): RPV Control Guideline - Entry Condition 1; RC/L-2; C7-2; C7-3 Deviation: Perry specific value for RPV low water level scram setpoint used in place of EPG value. (Also note that all RPV water levels are referenced to the
- top of active fuel) .
. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference draft Technical Specification Table 2.2.1-1. Reviewer: M um ,.k Date: /1,//7/ W l g - Approved: NO N/R . (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: M A Date: /t d #/f Approved: ) NO (circle one) ,- GSO: M,/ / o - Date: /z do Y Incorporated: f// v Date: & d .O , l~ 4 +- ? v - <-,a-tp-e--e-eft s i ge et e.-gn= er w e em- ' 4 y 'y'W^-T*"1"W't'**'T"*""--W'TTP M "1W 9 PGP Page: 136 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 28 EPG Step Number (s): RPV Control Guideline - Entry Condition; and elsewhere PSGT Step Number (s): RPV Control Guideline - Entry Condition 2; and else-where Deviation: Perry specific value for RPV high pressure scram setpoint used in place 2 of EPG value. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification:
- Reference draft Technical Specification Table 2.2.1-1.
l-Reviewer: uw,d Date: /A //7/TY ' Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: ((// Z Date: #/#MV Approved: NO (circle one) GSo: l/,9{ f xY;v , Date: /1l2.0/b'/ Incorporated: (I e, Date: / a!#
- 00 l
l . . . - . . - - . . - , , . . ~ . . . - . , - . . PGP Page: 137 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 29 EPG Step Number (s): RPV Control Guideline - Entry Condition; and elsewhere PSGT Step Number (s): RPV Control Guideline - Entry Condition 4; RC/Q-3; RC/Q-4; C7-1 Deviation: Perry specific value for APRM downscale trip used in place of EPG value. -s ' Evaluator: C.-S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference draft, Technical Specification Table 3.3.6-2. l l l l l Reviewer: -- me k Date: /1//T' TY t"y 1 i Approved: YE NO N/R (circle one) , NDAS Lead Engineer: I Date: /3///[i'# -Approved: @ NO (circle one) GSO: [g gho /2 , Date: /2/ eon'/ , Incorporated: b nM Date: /s v!(1' O .' i I _ . ~ . . . - - - PGP Page: 138 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 30 EPG Step Number (s): RC/L-1 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/L-1 Deviation: Wording has been revised. ~~ Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification:
- Revision simplified the content without altering the intent.
l I i l' r L Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany .Date: 11/16/84 l. Approved: YES NO @ (circle one) l NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: h NO (circle one) ~ GSO: $ $ w . U Date: /2lb0kW l Incorporated: f//{[prn, Date: / t.[u[W 00 c .: PGP Page: 139 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 31 EPG Step Number (s): RC/L-1 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/L-1 - - _ . Deviation: Item C, " Emergency diesel generators" is included in list of systems _ _ _ , which should be initiated if conditions require. Also, the word _ _ _ _ _ _ . " Emergency" has been changed to " Standby". Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Entry Condition 3 automatically starts the standby diesel generators. The systen title revision reflects Perry specific terminology. Reference drawings 208-216 sheets 5 and 6, revision E. Reviewer: u , , ,1 Date: /% // 7 [K'/ L Approved: NO .N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: - Date: /M/ 9/f/ -Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: [ /[ Date: /2.//e/ / Incorporated: [l I ,s v ' Date: /s.[u!// "6 c= 1 PGP Page: 140 Attachment 7 (Cont.) 4 Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 32 EPG Step Number (s): RC/L-1 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/L-1 Deviation: "HPCS diesel generator" was added to the list of equipment to be initiated if conditions required. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Entry Condition 3 supplies an automatic start signal to the HPCS diesel generator. Reference drawing 208-066 sheet B101, revision F. Reviewer: )u e Date: JA//7/ W Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: M Date: A7//9/3'#' Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: [ % . Date: /2 /d ceh '/ Incorporated: 8/hsen/ Date: / PT ao 4 e -e--,--v-7 t- v- s- e =w -e -w------- *-4-r -- ,-w---+=-*-w+~ . .7 n .\~ c: '~ - ] f;l ,V g ye ~ .., 5 PGP $ Page: 141 ,c Attachment 7 (Cont.) se h;
- + s. :y g~. +
Deviations from the Generic Guidelines . b<l)e r .N . g, , Deviatioit Sheet: Number 33 4 ,i dd"StepNumber(s): " Box"precedingRC/L-2 - . .,s s PSGT Step Number (s): " Box" preceding RC/L-2 l Deviation: c: g In the first condition the phrase "or boron has been injected =into the RPV" was added, p n_. - 1- . 1 .,- , t o ... n s l- % (j 4 Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Da'te : 11/16/84 Justification: e -- Added to cover the circumstances where this PSTG has been entered from another PSTG which had already required boron injection. M;y + .x-41*;n t r. ,,4 i t. .. t'- ! I f .j_ + .l_ , ,.
- \.2
.g' t; , .e Liview{er: C. S. Orogvany'; , Date: 11/16/84 y p - 3 .q s , ~ ' Appr ed: YES NO $'y V? h (circle one) lOASLeadENgineer: 'M Date: i. fs?' . s , .l' r Approved: I E ; 0. NO .(dircle one) NSO:J .V ', 6ft w_ Date: /2/zo p A c.. l .- s , , , k _; 9 Incb}rporated: ' (/ht n, 4. ^ b ' Date: i Ze[h O MY\~$ t c d0 Ti l .. s' ' \: T < . ~ hh ;. - 't) wn a. , 6 ' ~ _' . ..it e x e
- . . j.. g lk.
s .- , e- - *$ , , . - . , . , . . . _ . _ _ . . _ , , _ . _ . . . . . _ _ . . PGP Page: 142 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 34 EPG Step Number (s): RC/L-2; C7-2; C7-3 PSGT = Step Number (s): RC/L-2; C7-2; C7-3 Deviation: Perry specific value for RPV high water level entry used in place of EPG value. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 k. Justification: ( Reference draft Technical Specification Table 2.2.1-1. [. p l Reviewer: um, Date: /,2 /1 yhaf . / l _ r): u Approved: YE NO N/R' (circle one) .NDAS Lead Engineer: M Date: M//f//9 Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: [ c Date: /zMe V Incorporated: ((h,t Date: / u[6' oo l PGP Page: 143 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 35 EPG Step Number (s): RC/L-2; C7-2 _ PSGT Step Number (s): RC/L-2; C7-2 Deviation: Perry specific value for range of operation of condensate /feedwater system used in place of EPG values. . ;. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Preliminary value based on specified shutoff head of the turbine driven feedwater puups. Actual value will be determined during pre-operational testing and will take into account elevation difference between pump dis-charge and point of injection into the RPV. Reference Feedvater System Design Description, pg. 3, dated 10/14/81. bhum , ~ Reviewer: -- Date: /A//~/ T4 , , Approved: S NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: I Date: M Approved: @ NO (circle one) GSO: YW / n Date: /LbO/h'f Incorporated: Mhv oo Date: / h t r ,en -a,a- - -,,,--,----ew ,---e-, ,-,-,e -- .an - en,--, . . - , , , , - , , ,,e-. , , . . . , - - - , , - ..m,,,-,,,-, ,n-,-m,~ l PGP Page: 144 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 36 EPG Step Number (s)i RC/L-2; C7-2 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/L-2; C7-2 Deviation: Perry specific value for range of operation of CRD system used in place of EPG values. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Preliminary value based on specified shutoff head of the control rod drive pumps. Actual value will be determined during pre-operational .: testing and will take into account elevation difference between pump dis-charge and point of injection into the RPV. Reference GE design specifi- [ [ ' cation data sheet 22A6094AA, revision 3, item 4.4. l i Reviewer: m, _ Date: /A!/7!('/ Approved: NO N/R (circle one) l, NDAS Lead Engineer: d- Date: h // i. Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: Wbw Date: /2kc/l</ Incorporated: [IIh,tn/ Date: e2.[u!4/ oc =-.= --- ,e - - , - - , . ~ - , .,,e, ----y,,,..wy- ,,,p*, -+=,-we---.r.,--eymce c--,-. <m----,- yv-e PGP Page: 145 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines b Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 37 EPG Step Number (s): RC/L-2; C7-2 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/L-2; C7-2 Deviation: Perry specific values for range of operation of RCIC system used in place of EPG values.
- - Evaluator
- C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification:
Reference GE Design Specification data sheet 22A6089AA, revision 5, section 4.2 (note: shutoff head information is unavailable); draf t Tech-nical Specification Table 3.3.2-2. ~ Reviewer: cam.,,k Date: /J .// 7 T'/ g , Approved: NO N/R (circle one) - , u.d n, ..r: azwRe -t.: npn Approved: NO (circle one) , GSO:. J [ v m Date: /2 O / Incorporated: //h .t m f Date: /2 2//// d0 w+-w er* rer .-- ,w'y wr<-we*-tv-t-e ---++-+'=e-wre -= + e~- ew ---:-w es w w - +e- + ,w-w-+vw---e-r=v-w e+-e- r"*-*eM*-rw' - w**rwm^ e v-'--w--v-e j PGP Page: 146 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines l Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 38 EPG Step Number (s): RC/L-2 and elsewhere . PSGT Step Number (s): RC/L-2 and elsewhere - Deviation: Reference to HPCI deleted. 4 i Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Perry does not have a HPCI system in its design. .i Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 h Approved: YES- NO (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: - Approved: -YES NO (circle one) GSO: l lm o Date: ilbe 'l - Incorporated: w Date: u[lf UU l PGP l Page: 147 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the ! Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 39 EPG Step Number (s): RC/L-2 l PSGT Step Number (s): RC/L-2 Deviation: Perry specific values for range of operation of HPCS system used in place l of EPG values. . i l i Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: l Reference Perry specific calculation 11016-27, Rev. O. l l I Reviewer: u .-14 Date: /2!/7 N ( J' Approved: YES NO .N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: h[ 2 Date: /.2/N//t Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: . _. //g/w ~ . Date: n do M Incorporated: //h tV Date: A v!ff 00 PGP Page: 148 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 40 EPG Step Number (s): RC/L-2 PSGI Step Number (s): RC/L-2 Deviation: Perry specific values for range of operation of LPCS used in place of EPG values. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Preliminary value based on specified shutoff head of the LPCS pump. Actual value will be determined during pre-operational testing and will take in account elevation difference between pump discharge and point of injection with the RPV. Reference GE design specification data sheet 22A3125AM, revision 2, section 4.1.2.b. Reviewer: umM Date: /.2 /7f74 Approved: YES NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: h ,/I. Date: /J//fd/ Approved: @ NO (circle one) CSO:^ [mk & fmye, ,, , - Date: sz/wk'/- Incorporated: 8 W Date: /L !// l , ,,--.-.w-- , -y, , - ,-.-~e , , - - - . - - - - - - , - - . .~- - - * ~ ~ PGP Page: 149 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 41 EPG Step Number (s): RC/L-2 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/L-2 Deviation: Perry specific values for range of operation of LPCI used in place of EPG values. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Preliminary value based on specified shutoff head of the RHR pump. Actual value will be determined during pre-operational testing and will take into account elevation difference between pump discharge and point of injection into the RPV. Reference GE design specification data sheet 22A3139AM, revision 7, section 4.1.2.b. Reviewer: - ; bm I Date: /A // 7 fY i o Approved: YES NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: k M Date: ////FIM Approved: h NO (circle one) GSO: ffY .hgru a-b Date: /L/E0 W Incorporated: [ knfv' 00 Date: /* PGP Page: 150 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 42 EPG Step Number (s): RC/L-2 and elsewhere PSGT Step Number (s): RC/L-2; Cl-6; Cl-7; C4-3; C7-2 C7-2.2; C7-3 Deviation: Perry specific value for top of active fuel used in place of EPG value. , Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 . Justification: Reference correspondence PY-CEI/ GEN-755 and PY-GEN /CEI-2196. l- -t i Reviewer: Date: /3.h7,/TY. l a m.,, ,k - I Approved: NO N/R (circle one) > .NDAS Lead Engineer: uMI. A. Date: B//////- t Approved: m NO (circle one) GSO: /bria Dete: /2bobV Incorporated: [ h,pv' - Date: ,2 !ft uo fs' l r PGP Page: 151 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 43 EPG Step Number (s): RC/L-2; RC/P-4 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/L-2; RC/P-4 Deviation: Steps referring to CONTINGENCY 5 were deleted. - Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 ' Justification: Contingency 5 has been deleted - See Deviation Sheet Number 118. P l Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: @ NO (circle one) GSO: / / fu Date:- /2IO/ / Incorporated: [/b,ty' Date: ez[tr[# . Ou PGP Page: 152 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 44 EPG Step Number (s): RC/L-3 and elsewhere PSGT Step Number (s): RC/L-3 and elsewhere Deviation: Where Perry specific instructions are known, they are included and referenced by instruction number. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: .. Included to aid the preparer of the Plant Emergency Instructions developed from the PSTG. Note: SOI- System Operating Instruction; ONI- Of f-Normal Instruction. Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES N0 h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: h NO (circle one) GSO: S d t/kN4,Ac> Date: n40/h/ Incorporated: // ~ 7 .tn _ Date: /2 ' V dO ..~._ f ,PGP Page: 153 i Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 45
- EPG' Step Number (s): RC/L-3 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/L-3 Deviation:
I Step no longer unconditionally directs the operator to proceed to cold i
- shutdown.
=_ F 4 Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 ^ - . Justification: _ Since RC/P, RC/L, and RC/Q are executed concurrently, the operator is directed in only one of these, RC/P, to proceed to cold shutdown. < f Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO d[]D (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date:
- Approved: h NO (circle one)
GSO: sf is ,L ) cik ' Date: /2 lLo W Incorporated: 8/N.nf 7 UO Date: /a[2/h _e.e.w.w+=-ee- i PGP Page: 154 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the
- Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet
- Numbe r 46 EPG Step Number (s): RC/P PSGT Step Number (s): RC/P Deviation:
Phrase "and Boron injection is not required" was added. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Prevents inadvertant removal of boron from the reactor which could , otherwise have affected the shutdown status of the reactor. Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO @ (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: h NO (circle one) ,GSO: Y / /m, j u Date /tbo/fc/ Incorporated: [l((>sw ' 00 Date: et[idy PGP Page:155 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 47 EPG Step Number (s): RC/P; C2-1.2; C4-1 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/P; C2 -1.1; C4-1 Deviation: Perry specific number of SRVs dedicated to ADS function used in place of __. EPG value. . Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany . . . Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference drawing 302-608 revision B. Reviewer: ku % ,1,, . Date: /J,)rM, r4 Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: 4 I Date: /~// 9.N/ Approved: h NO (circle one) GSO: l WA lnear > Date: /2 /70 W Incorporated: 8M,W Date: i [N 04 PGP Page: 156 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 48 EPG Step Number (s): RC/P-1 and elsewhere PSGT Step Number (s): RC/P-1 and elsewhere Deviation: Reference to the isolation condenser was removed. Eval.uator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Perry design does not incorporate isolation condensers. I Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO @ (circle one) ! NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: l- Approved: h NO (circle one) GSO: / / [nue Date: /2/$0/ / Incor rated: f/$ev Date: a u b*/ QQ -r -- - .- . . . - - . , - . . . _.._._,..-_ y ,, . ,.,y__.,,m.w..,...,.r,,,.,m ,,e.,,,,....,_--,,_.,m,. . PGP Page: 157 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Nuu.be r 49 EPG Step Number (s): RC/P-1 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/P-1 Deviation: - Perry specific value for RPV pressure at which all turbine bypass valves . are fully open is marked " Inter". Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Uncertainties in the calculational methodology have prevented finaliza- . tion of this value. This will be addressed when the PEIs are prepared. Reviewer: spv). fM Date /A //7 ff Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: [hM d Dater /M/9/// Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: k,[/ $1 u Date: /d 0 V Incorporated: [ .rr / Date: < * / fg do 4 - - - - - --n--- , ,.,e-- ~g-,-a,..---.-ne--n.---,m--..e- m--- n-- --e t-- ~ . - , ---w PGP Page: 158 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 50 EPG Step Number (s): RC/P-1; SP/T-4 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/P-1; SP/T-4 Deviation: Perry specific curve for Heat Capacity Temperature Limit used in place of EPG curves. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 _ Justification: Reference Perry specific calculation 11016-3, Rev.0. Reviewer: m, ok Date: Mb7/TY Q' i i Approved: NC N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: d Date: Ak/f/// Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: b pesres / Date: /2/ Lek'/ Incorporated: ( .r m f Date: / L[u[fy o5 PGP Page: 159 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 51 EPG Step Number (s): RC/P-1; SP/L-3.1 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/P-1; SP/L-3.1 Deviation: Curve is marked "Later". _ _ Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: , Uncertainties in the calculational methodology have prevented finaliza-tion of this curve. This will be addressed when the PEIs are prepared. Reviewer: ~ umu Date: /.2./7!(Y f)' / / Approved: S NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: k. M Date: /h 9M Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: [ [ sdeafu Date: /2/to '/ Incorporated: [ t,f Date: st[u[fp 06 PGP Page: 160 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 52 EPG Step Number (s): RC/P-2 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/P-2 Deviation: Perry specific value for lowest SRV lif t pressure used in place of EPG value. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference draft Technical Specification 3.4.2.2. Reviewer: Mmd - Date: /J //7,/W 7 Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: M Date: /#//9/8 Approved: NO (circle one) // > - GSO: a - }///[xkwr& e Date: /2 boff'/ , Incorporated: 8 .te r Date: s!v /i/ os PGP Page: 161 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 53 EPG Step Number (s): RC/P-2 , PSGI Step Number (s): RC/P-2 Deviation: Phrase added which covered the case where SRVs had already lifted and the _ Low-Low Set function had already activated. . _ Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference draft Technical Specification 3.4.2.2. Reviewer: ~ u n. Date: fl /)7!(Y ff I ~f Approved: S NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: [ I Date: /Jd9.M'/ Approved: h NO (circle one) CSO: W kruro y Date: /Lkob/ Incorporated: h// d Date: I u // 00 PGP Page: 162 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 54 EPG Step Number (s): RC/P-2; C1-1.2 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/P-2; C2-1.1 _ Deviation: Perry specific value for elevation of top of SRV discharge device used in place of EPG value. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference drawing 301-734, revision J. Reviewer: m.d Date: /lf/7[74 / rJ' 'l Approved: S NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Yd [I M, Date: 4/////V Approved: h NO (circle one) GSO: W km o ,v Date: /L/LC 'l Incorporated: 8//[ hen / Date: / uhy OO PGP Page: 163 Attachment 7 (Cont.) l Deviations from the j Generic Guidelines ? 5 Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 55 4 EPG Step Number (s): RC/P-2 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/P-2
- Deviation:
Phrase "depressurize with sustained SRV opening" was changed to " place .E the control switch for each SRV in the OFF position". I
- h. -
Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 5 Justification: r If SRVs must be used to augment RPV pressure control, and if the contin-e uous SRV pneumatic supply is unavailable, the valves should be closed to -- limit the number of cycles on the valves, thereby conserving pneumatic ;j . . _ pressure so that the valves would be available if Emergency Depressuriza-P tion were subsequently required. Reviewer: ' m .,$ Date: /2 /i7f W ff I / Approved: YES NO N/R (circle one) y NDAS Lead Engineer: O. d. Date: /3//9/f/ Approved: h NO (circle one) GSO: W kniv s e , . Date: 12 ft c ./hW ^ Incorporated: f/b, Date: / y 00 PGP Page: 164 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 56 EPG Step Number (s): RC/P-2 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/P-2 Deviation: Phrase "[other steam driven equipment]" replaced by steam condensing mode of RHR, turbine driven feedwater punes, and steam jet air ejectors. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Perry design permits the use of these components to augment RPV pressure control systems. Reviewer: u m ,1 Date: /2//7/7V Approved: YES NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Y [ Z Date: /2//#/f/ Approved: h NO (circle one) GSO: f W/ w - _ Date: / ?- l20 '</ Incorpo ated: 8/h.c e,
- _ Date: it / ff os
c - PGP Page: 1o5 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 57 EPG Step Number (s): RC/P-3 and elsewhere PSGT Step Number (s): RC/P-3 and elsewhere Deviation: Words "to or" added to statement concerning rod position. ... Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justificat' ion: EPG wording not consistent with meaning of " maximum suberitical banked _ , withdrawal pcsition". _ _ _ . . . i Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 .a e Approved: YES NO h (circle ene) NDAS Lead Engineer: ,, Date: _ Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: / k /.nga . _ Date: /L cshY Incorporated: [bec- / Date: st [ ,. 00 L.. =. PGP Page: 166 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 58 EPG Step Number (s): RC/P-3 and elsewhere PSGT Step Number (s): RC/P-3 and elsewhere deviation: Perry specific value for maximum suberitical banked withdrawal position used in place of EPG value. _ Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 ' Justification: Value based on bounding calculations performed by fuel / reactor vendor for BWR 6 design. Reviewe r: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO Q (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: l. d 6w Date: /? /Erk/ Incorporated: [b v Date: sL[u[r (0 V PGP Page: 167 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 59 EPG Step Number (s): RC/P-3; RC/Q-4.2 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/P-3; RC/Q-5.2 Deviation: Perry specific value for Cold ShutdWn Boron Weight used in place of EPG value. . _ Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Jus tification:- Reference Perry specific calculation 11016-5, Rev. O. Reviewer: Sumub _ Date: /A //7/f4/ ' l f) / ~ / Approved: YES NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: - d Date: /J//9 N Approved: YES NO (circle one) CSO: L- - Date: /2Mo/W Incorporated: h/ erm , Date: t!s!N ao - 5 - , - - . - - -. --,>r - ~ , - ,, ,--,.-,--r-,+ n -- - , a-+ ,- ,- -- - -- - - --p , .- PGP Page: 168 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 60 EPG Step Number (s): RC/P-3 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/P-3 Deviation: Sentence "If one or more . . . sustained SRV opening" was added. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 __ Justification:
- With the reactor shutdown, depressurization s:ith sustained SRV opening is
' specified in order to minimize cycles on the valve (s) and to place the - reactor in a condition where Emergency Depressurization would not be required. i Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date 11/16/84 h Approved: YES NO @ (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date:
- Approved
- [ NO (circle one)
GSO:. l / Dates /2 /)s b/ Incorporated: d er m Date: st s/# U0 l-l l t n l T - Oh9 - [ ~ ~ 's PGP 7 ' d . Page: 169 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 61 EPG Step Number (s): RC/Q-1 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/Q-1, Deviation: < , ( idtep included in PSTG. __ l , r f %;s t- t [,.4.% f ..f >
- r i
.x Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 i Justlf.1 cation: Since.the action inserts a diverse and- redun' dant signal to de-energize . c\)? f h; the scram relays, it+ was included. Reference drawing 208-040 revision J. -t , A r. yL . I j . , <3 l .-% ,' ' \ __ p .Q k',* .y+- Reviewar: / dum ,1 + Date: , /2 // / 7 p/ -f , q : ' / Appreved. ,, , NO N/R - (circle one) 4, NDASLeadEnginee),: k d - Date: /#[// / Approved: @ NO (circle one)' GSb: W /l n) , Date: /2/bc '/ Incorpora ed: (( OOh - Date: i <!J1 j s., $ e, 9 b . _ y.3,p.- - - -.-_r y ,.- m - - - r rr-.m +.- , . ,- . _ - - - . ._ - , .= - _ . _. - . - _ . . _.=-. - PGP Page: 170 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 62 EPG Step Number (s): N/A PSGT Step Number (s): RC/Q-2 Deviation: New step added which directs the operator to manually initiate Alternate _ Rod Insertion if reactor power is above 5% or cannot be determined. _ ._ ' Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: . Perry design incorporates the Alternate Rod Insertion function which is separate 'and redundant to the reactor protection / control rod drive scram function. r - Reviewer: C.-S. Orogvany Date: -11/16/84 Approved: YES NO h (circle one)
- i. '
NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: l-l --Approved: YES NO (circle one) GSO: . 1) . _ Date: /2 mom */ h Incorporated: (d .& / - Date: e s[a,[h () O ~ f ; - - , - - - ~,n-., .,, ., , , , . . . , . ~ . . - , ..,,w,-.,.,n,,n....,-,-,,v,,-.,,s_, > , , ~,-_,,.--,,,.m,- ,,e, -a,,, ,g-+-,n_,,.,. , _ - PGP Page: 171 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 63 EPG Step Number (s): RC/Q-2 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/Q-3 Deviation: Phrase "and the MSIVs are open" was included in the PSTG. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Since the turbine-generator ,*oes not receive a direct trip signal when the MSIVs close, it would be possible (technically) to have the turbine-generator on-line even though the MSIVs have closed. Therefore, the statement added is appropriate. Reference drawing 802-009, revision 3. Reviewer: a m ,h Date: /2 //7/1r4 rj ' i Approved: YES NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: . d Date: /2 9/f/ Approved: YES NO (circle one) GSO: ? f //7n a n Date: /L/ho V Incorporated: - ec v Date: i ts */' U0 F - - a a- - - - , . - - - , , - -,- - ,,,-s-, --,----+,,-e l l PGP Page: 172 Attachment 7 (Cont.) j Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 64 EPG Step Number (s): RC/Q-2 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/Q-3 Deviation: Phrase added which dircets the operator to further decrease reactor power by downshif ting the recirculation pumps to slow speed. , , , 4 Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Perry design utilizes two speed recirculation pumps and flow control ,, valves to vary recirculation flow. . , , , 7-:- Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany= Date: 11/16/84 -Approved: YES NO h (circle one) -NDAS Lead Engineer:. Date: Approved: @ NO (circle one)- GSO: Yl/ffix sf Date: >L / 0 Incorporated: 8/Ibse, Date: ib!h oo PGP Page: 173 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 65 EPG Step Number (s): RC/Q-4 + PSGT Step Number (s): RC/Q-5 ~ l Deviation: I Perry specific curve for Boron Injection Initiation Temperature used in place of EPG curve. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference Perry specific calculation 11016-6, Rev. O. h Reviewer: Numad Date: /1//7/g4/ Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NMS Lead Engineer: I /2 Date: /2////// ' Approved: h NO (circle one) GSO: -!/df / L) Date: /2./L 0 V Incorporated: h +-/ ou Date: u y PGP Page: 174 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines t Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 66 EPG Step Number (s): RC/Q-4 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/Q-5 Deviation: Perry systems which can be used for alternate boron injection have not yet been determined. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Evaluation of possible system configuration is underway. This will be . addressed when the PEIs are prepared. _ _ .. ( Reviewer: d,$am d Date: /J.//7/74 q 1 Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: I (( A Date: /4//9/// Approved: YES NO (circle one) GSO: /! /[x/[')my Date: /l/LokY Incorpo ated: h si-v ou Date: /t [# i PGP Page: 175 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 67 EPG Step Number (s): RC/Q-5.1 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/Q-6.1 . Deviation: Perry specific fuse and panel numbers used in place of EPG numbers. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84~ Justification: Reference drawing 208-040 sheet A10, revision H. Reviewer: - , hum, f,k ( - Date: /2 [/7 <a/f'/ t Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: YM /2 Date: /2/20/f/ Approved: h NO (circle one) GSO: W gMn Date: /2/2c V Incorporated: sw Date: / (* [N 00 - - - - - , , , - - - , ,- ,e- ,-,---.-,,7 ,--,-nem,wp--,,g,,-- ....,m-r----,p-~q-,,-ewn,~ PGP Page: 176 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 68 EPG Step Number (s): RC/Q-5.1 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/Q-6.1 Deviation: Step requiring isolation and venting of scram air header deleted. / Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Perry design incorporates an Alternate Rod Insertion sub-system which providen a diverse and redundant mechanism to vent the scram air header, . thus opening the scram inlet and outlet valves and closing the scram dis-charge volume vent and drain valves. Reviewer: - bum() d, Date: /2!/7!1(t/.. i i - l Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: A Date: /?//9/// Approved: M NO (circle one) -GSO: C[J[ [usu e Date: /2 /$e # Incorporated: e/ Date: 00 v ~ w er ,----nr-- w--e-rw-e-,,w,re----m--g-s w -a.r-e,~~ver---p-m--- r ,w - - - - - - - - - - , - PGP Page: 177 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 69 EPG Step Number (s): RC/Q-5.2 and elsewhere , PSGT Step Number (s): RC/Q-6.2 and elsewhere Deviation: Actions to be taken in event scram could not be reset have been deleted. l Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 --- Justification: Several actions required by these steps require entry into the primary - containment, which, for a Mark III containment may not be safe following an A'1WS. l L i I 1. - Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84, - Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: - Approved: $ NO (circle one) GSO: W /mg . Date: /2./o W Incorporated: A [ sw / Date: i di R ' l- .) 00 -,..+,e,--.na.--wn,--e em, w,sn,,ne,-.., --,n.,-moon,,_n-,-n,,.,,e en , . , - . ..wn,ym,-,, ,c, ,.,_,,w.n.. ..m.-,...,,w-,- ag., ..,.n,vna,,,----. - _=. . - . . . . - . - . .-_. . . . . PGP Page: 178 i Attachment 7 (Cont.) 1 Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 70 EPG Step Number (s): RC/Q-5.3 PSGT Step Number (s): RC/Q-6.3 Deviation: Wording has been revised. l-Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Revised wording directs attention to the importance of the scram dis- [ charge volume being drained rather than whether or not the vent and drain valves are open. , ,. i' Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 l'_ . Approved: YES .NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: h Approved: 'NO -(cirele one) GSO: $ gf Date: /d e Incorporated: /Ihsen / Date: / *be J f .o o ,w m m- ,-e,., ,- , ,-e + - e-, ,. s . . - , . , sw.w--, r,-,-- , , . . - ~ , - , , _ . . ,,,.------,vvw- PGP Page: 179 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 71 EPG Step Number (s): Primary Containment Control Guidelines - Entry Con-ditions; and elsewhere PSGT Step Number (s): Primary Containment Control Guidelines - Entry Con-ditions 1, 2, 3; and elsewhere Deviation: _ _. _ " Suppression pool tamperature," "Drywell Temperature," and " Containment Temperature" were changed to " Suppression pool average temperature," "Drywell average temperature," and " Containment average temperature". Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: __ Draf t Perry Technical Specifications 3.6.1.7, 3.6.2.6, 3.6.3.1 LCOs are written specif ying area average temperatures. EPG term is vague; opera-tor could conservatively assume that any of the monitored points in excess of the limit would be sufficient to enter the PEI developed from this guideline and unnecessarily enter the PEI. Reviewer: b q Date: /Af/7fTI , a Approved: (circle one) 6YES -NO N/R NDAS Lead Engineer: , . A Date: /2//f/s'/ Approved: [ NO (circle one) -GSO: s [fta .- Date: /2. M4 / Incorporated: /f ,rm_ Date: /t u , oo PGP Page: 180 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 72 EPG Step Number (s): Primary Containment Control Guidelines - Entry Con-dition; SP/T-2 PSGT Step Number (s): Primary Containment Control Guidelines - Entry Con-dition 1; SP/T-2 Deviation: EPG value for most limiting suppression pool temperature LCO verified .1 correct for Perry. i Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference draft Technical Specification 3.6.3.1. Reviewer: N Date: n.In1% Approved: -NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: [ [ Date: /f[/>' / Approved: h NO' (circle one) GSO: edu b Date: /2 Me / Incorporated: f/ ,rw Date: /2 f! o6 . . 1 PGP Page: 181 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines _ i Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 73 EPG Step Number (s): Primary Containment Control Guidelines - Entry Con-dition; DW/T-1 PSGT Step Number (s): Primary Containment Control Guidelines - Entry Con-dition 2; DW/T-1 Deviation: EPG value for drywell average temperature LCO verified correct for Perry. Reference to maximum normal operating temperature deleted. , Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference draf t Technical Specification 3.6.2.6 for drywell average , temperature LCO. Reference to maximum normal operating t'emperature tats _ _ , _ , _ deleted because it is inappropriate to use a single area temperature (even _ _ _ __ _ though in excess of the average temperature ILO) by itself to require entry into a PEI. . . . . . Reviewer: Date: isin/+e . -Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: [ f 2 Date: /?//?/f/ _ Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: Y dhxer j /n Date: JZks Incorporated: N//h,m ' Date': / ~ oo . PGP Page: 182 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 74 EPG Step Number (s): Primary Containment Control Guidelines - Entry Con-dition; CN/T-1 PSGT Step Number (s): Primary Containment Control Guidelines - Entry Con- , dition 3; CN/T-1 Deviation: EPG value for containment average temperature LCO verified correct for Perry. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference draft Technical Specification 3.6.1.7. l-l Reviewer: Id v Date: \1In loM Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: [ d Date: //////N' Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: fu , v Date: /Z/bebV ( Incorporated: f/[ <r~ Date: /2 /g 00 . i. _ . . _ _ _ - - ~ . _ . . . . . . _ - - . - . ~ . - . PGP Page: 183 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines l l Deviation Sheet: Number 75 EPG Step Number (s): Primary Containment Control Guideline - Entry Con-dition and elsewhere PSGT Step Number (s): Primary Containment Control Guideline - Entry Con-dition 5 and elsewhere Deviation: Perry specific value for maximum suppression pool level LCO used in place l of EPG value. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84-Justification: Reference draft Technical Specification 3.6.3.1. Reviewer: TM Date: Mlnlh Approved: h NO- N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: A Date: //////N . Approved: h NO ' (circle one) - GSO: [ [ [ mad Date: / 2. ,Me7 Incorporated: w Date: / &[ 00 . J' PGP Page: 184 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 76 EPG Step Number (s): Primary Containment Control Guideline - Entry Con-dition and elsewhere PSGT Step Number (s): Primary Containment Control Guideline - Entry Con- , dition 6 and elsewhere Deviation: Perry specific value for minimum suppression pool water LCO used in place , of EPG value. . l=, . Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference draft Technical Specification 3.6.3.1. t J Reviewer: TA k Date: nin ku Approved: h NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead' Engineer: ((. d Date: /4////// Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: f g/mra Date: /2 / D Ak/ 1 Incorporated: [/ u w : Date: /2 // ca . l. I PGP Page: 185 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 77 EPG Step Number (s): " Box" preceding SP/T PSGT Step Number (s): N/A Deviation: ! " Box" was deleted. l i I I l Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Utility intent is to prepare separate instructions to be executed indi-i vidually based on specific entry conditions rather than execute SP/T, ~ ~ j' DW/T, CN/T, PC/P, and SP/L concurrently based on any single entry con-L t
- c i-l Reviewe .
- C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 ,
- _ Approved
- YES NO h (circle one)
NDAS Lead Engineer: Date:
- _ Approved
- YES NO (cirele one)
{ GSO: . xfy J Date: /2kofBC/ i Incorporated: ' [/[ ~ ef Date: /t b ff l 00 L . I PGP Page: 136 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 78 EPG Step Number (s): SP/T-1 PSGT Step Number (s): SP/T-1 Deviation: Statement requiring a reactor scram if an SORV could not be closed within ttso minutes taas deleted. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Draf t Perry Technical Specifications do not require this action. Reference Technical Specification 3.4.2.1.b. Reviewer: ;%a. < r % Date: ll//7/Wi i Approved: YES NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: _ k d Date: /2////// Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: ax; _- Date: A-/[#/ / Incorporated: f/f w Date: /2f 00 .. -- - - - . ~ . . . . . - , -- PGP Page: 187 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 79 EPG Step Number (s): SP/T-3 4 PSGT Step Number (s): SP/T-3 --* Deviation: ~ ' - - " The Technical Specification limiting suppression pool temperatute is used in place of the Boron Injection Initiation Temperature. ,A Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: ~ - Draf t Technical Specification 3.6.3.1 requires the mode svitch to be - placed in SHUTDOWN at a suppression pool temperature of 110*F. Use of -~ '- the Boron Injection Initiation Temperature would allow suppression pool - ' ' ~ ~ = tencerature to exceed 110*F prior to requiring a reactor scram.' Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 i .' Approved: YES NO h (circle one) - NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: - Approved: NO (circle one) , GSO: f wM Date: /2. O -Incorporated: f/Iberf Date: [z, u d6 --- ,r -,.w---e, we *,,ne-,-- -w-+ e-- -w , e- -,-ev ,.*,-.%+- m,,,,...#,.- ,e.w.-.- ,,-~+.--w..---.-+w . , - . . - - , . , . - - . . PGP Page: 188 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number _80 EPG Step Number (s): SP/T-4 PSGI Step Number (s): SP/T-4 Deviation: Order of phrases was changed. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: If actions performed in steps SP/T-1, SP/T-2, and SP/T-3 are insufficient , to maintain suppression pool temperature below the HCTL, control of RPV pressure is effected through entry into the RPV Control Guideline and execution of the RPV pressure control steps specified therein. 11/16/84 Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: _ _ Approved: YES NO @ (circle . one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: / / [/ arc Date: /2/eo // / 4 Incorporated: Md.ew / Date: / a.[u[fy -- VD d PGP Page: 189 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 81 EPG Step Number (s): " Box" preceding DW/T 2 - PSGT Step Number (s): N/A .. Deviation: " Box" was deleted. ._ , Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 . Justification: Contained. statement which required concurrent execution of steps DW/T-2 and DW/T-3. Deviation 82 deleted step DW/T-2, removing need for state- . ment. Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO @ (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: YES NO (circle one) GSO: N tot > Date: /2 / IO '/ Incorporated: f em / Date: t[ W o6 ,- m me-, . e- , - , . . ,.--n.a,.,.... ,,-e-a e ------,-nr-,- - w,-n p,e. ,y ,,.w-, y.- , . . , , ,m,wogn m .ew,--w.m,-w,w- g, n g-w rm , y - PGP Page: 190 Attachnent 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 82 EPG Step Number (s): DW/T-2; CN/T-4 PSGT Step Number (s): N/A Deviation: EPG steps deleted. _ ,.-e me Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 . ' Justification: . ~ Steps have been incorporated into CAUTION 6. .. Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 . . Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: YES NO (circle one) GSO: [ M _ Date: /2 O_ Incorporated: ( , Date: # 2[!fV OO k 1_ y , - . . _ _ . . . .- . ...m,_ . . - _ . , _ . . . , , . . , . . . . _ . . . _ _ _ . _ _ . , . _ , . _ . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . , . . . . ~ . _ . . - _ . PCP Page: 191 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines l Deviation Sheet: Number 83 EPG Step Number (s): DW/T-3 and elsewhere PSGT Step Number (s): DW/T-2 and elsewhere . Deviation: First paragraph of EPG step DW/T-3 was removed. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: i ', Perry design does not incorporate a drywell spray system, hence, the I paragraph is N/A. Similar to Deviation Sheet 22. Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO @ (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: . Approved: NO (circle ona) GSO: f/ { b geyt) . Date: /Zky 9/ -Incorporated: f//[b,,-f Date: /tddH d5 9 1 - M[ . - - - . . - - , . - -- -,r, .vg . . -4 , - - - - - , - - - , **--,-.r v- e m -w -*-=,----<-we-e=ee w -mm*~ dew-r** <e -tw---- e- w- 1 1 PGP l Page: 192 l Attachment 7 (Cont.) I Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 84 EPG Step Number (s): DW/T-3 PSGT Step Number (s): DW/T-2 Deviation: Perry specific value of the lower of maximum temperature at which ADS __ qualified or drywell design temperature used in place of EPG value. . __ 4 Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84
- Justification
Reference FSAR Tables 6.2-1 and 6.2-2. Reviewer: , Date: nlal% . Approved: NO. N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Y d Date: N/#/N Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: /f <cs xJ sk Date: > LlLCk'f . Incorporated: h nnf ' Date: /*!& W 06 I -. - - , , , - - - , - - , , ~ - - - . , - , - - - - - , - -. PGP Page: 193 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the , Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 85 EPG Step Number (s): N/A PSGT Step Number (s): " Box" preceding CN/T-2 _. Deviation: Statement was added instructing the operator to terminate containment spray if containment pressure drops below (later) psig. -- _ Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 - Justification: . Once containment spray has been initiated, convective cooling may de- __. pressurize the containment to below its design negative pressure. Termi- _ . _ _ nating containment spray when containment pressure drops below . . _ . _ (later) psig terminates the depressurization before the design negative . _ - pressure is exceeded without challenging the containment vacuum relief i system. This value will be finalized af ter the methodology for the Perry
- i. Containment Spray Initiation Pressure Limit is finalized.
' Reviewer: be moe,k Date: / TC ~ Q / I Approved: ES NO - N/R (circle one) - . ..NDAS Lead Engineer: [ M c _e m Mr #A P Date: / i [Ff Approved: NO (circle one) eSe: Pe>yr eat.: s ' Incorporated: *t d Date: '/4 44 , UU PGP Page: 194 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the . Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 86 EPG Step Number (s): CN/T-2; CN/T-3 PSGT Step Number (s): CN/T-2; CN/T-3 . ._ Deviation: EPG value of containment design temperature verified correct for Perry. . I Evalstor: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference FSAR Table 6.2-2. 4 \ Reviewer: Tk. Date: bil tl% [- Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: d Date: /!///// Approved: h NO (circle one) GSO: $ //na*t.) Date: /2 /20 cf Incorporat d: h % Date: a N 00 l-I PGP Page: 195 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 87 EPG Step Number (s): CN/T-2; PC/P-2 PSGT Step Number (s): CN/T-2; PC/P-2 Deviation: Perry specific value for Mark III Containment Spray Initiation Pressure Limit used in place of EPG value. _ Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: _ This value will be provided when the methodology for this calculation as it applies to Perry is finalized. Reviewer: ' /s,. k Date: \f4lC5 S F Approved: h NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: h [ M E /. m ME4p Date: / [ff - Approved: NO (circle one) . GSO: / [ [I Date: //3/Jf ~ Incorporated: 8M.w 00 Date: Ibfl' PGP Page: 196 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 88 EPG Step Number (s): PC/P-1 PSGT Step Number (s): PC/P-1 Deviation: Reference to standby gas treatment system was removed. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Perry design does not incorporate a standby gas treatment system. Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO Q (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: / fw/s, w Date: /2kO/9'/ Incorporated: (/fh,w Date: /ts H UG -----------m PGP Page: 197 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 89 EPG Step Number (s): PC/P-1 PSGT Step Number (s): PC/P-1 Deviation: EPG value for Maximum Non-Condensible Evacuation Temperature was verified correct for Perry. -- -- a Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: At 212*F or above steam would be removed from the drywell during purging. Subsequent drywell cooling could result in eAccas negative pressures in ' --- the drywell. In order to minimize drywell vacuum when the drywell is - cooled, operator should purge only when drywell temperature is below 212*F. Review'er: um rj Date: /A // ffT'/- Approved: YES NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: I Date: /tM9/5F Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: // h e) Date: /2ke -/ Inco ated: haa Date: /Z f/ 06 PGP Page: 198 Attachnent 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 90
- EPG Step Number (s): PC/P-2 PSGT S* , Number (s): PC/P-2 i
Deviation: i Phrases not applicable to Mark III containments were deleted. 3 . Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: . EPG was written to be applicable to all containment designs so that applicable statements could be incorporated and non-applicable statements '.muld be deleted. r !~ f ~ Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 . Approved: .YES NO h (circle one) Date: NDAS Imad Engineer: ' Approved: NO -(circle one) GSO: / V_ Date: /1!Jo [ ' ' Incorporated: w Date: / uh OO , . . ..~.. --...--_ ,' PGP Page: 199 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 91 EPG Step Number (s): PC/P-4 PSGr Step Number (s): PC/P-3 Deviation: Perry specific curve for Pressure Suppression Pressure used in place of EPG curve. - - -. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: t Reference Perry specific calculation 11016-12, Rev. O. Reviewer: I. Date: hinIW _ Approved: h NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: ,[ 4 Date: /JM[N ' Approved:_ =NO (circle one) GSO: - Yff fw e Date: /Ll2ck/ Incorporated: h/[h,<%, Date: /2/ 'J 0 - , - PGP Page: 200 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines ~ Deviation Sheet: Number 92 EPG Step Number (s): PC/P-5 PSGT Step Number (s): PC/P-4 _ Deviation: , Perry specific curve for Primary Containment Design Pressure used in , place of EPG curve. , _ _ ' Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 , Justification: , Reference Perry specific calculation 11016-13, Rev. O. . Rayiewer: M Date: hln1%- Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: II(( 2 (Date: /2//?/gv LApproved: h NO (circle one) GSO: // fngn) _ Date: /E o / Incorporated: [//han, Date: / t. f/ U0 n. kl. PGP Page: 201 l Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines ^ Deviation Sheet: Number 93 ?. , EPG Step Number (s): PC/P-6 PSGT Step Number (s): PC/P-5 _ . _ Deviation: . Perry specific curve for Primary Containment Pressure Limit used in place of EPG curve. _ Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 . Justification: Reference Perry specific calculation 11016-14, Rev. O. . _.. i .- i-Reviewer: M Date: l>lh)N L Approved: h NO N/R (circle one) ?: ;NDAS Lead Engineer: [. I Date: /2//Jo /V Approved: h NO (circle one) GSO: f / d lfstis- 2 Yr? Date: /2 /$a f/ Incorporated: (2/ f ,s , .- Date: /t /Y (J 0 . s -v-.. , , e e, w,' rye--m -- , .-.w- ..,.4,-c e we.wwvy- , ,w-,v.-s..,+ ,,-= PGP Page: 202 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 94 EPG Step Number (s): PC/P-6 PSGT Step Number (s): PC/P-5 - Deviation: Phrase concerning elevation of suppression pool spray nozzles was re-moved. __ _ Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 _. Justification: Perry design does not incorporate a dedicated suppression pool spray system. The containment spray nozzles are located on the inner surface ,, i ~ of the containment dome, hence it's not realistic to assume they could be . _ . covered by - water. Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS IAad Engineer: Date: Approved: NO - (circle one) GSO: Ah[ o / Date: /2 Ib ' 6/ -Incorporated: [Iber/ ! Date: [u[H OO o l PGP Page: 203 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 95 EPG Step Number (s): PC/P-7 _ . PSGT Step Number (s): PC/P-6 _ _ . _ _ ~ + Deviation: Phrase " irrespective of the of fsite radioactivity release rate" was added _ _ _ _ Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Under these circumstances, venting is the only mechanism remaining which .could prevent an uncontrolled, unpredictable and possibly irreparable breach of primary containment. Although venting will probably result in the release of some radioactivity to the environment, this is preferable to containment failure whereby adequate core cooling may also be lost and radioactivity is released with no control whatsoever. Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 ' Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: S . NO (circle one) CSO: b>ws 2 e Date: /LlLO Incorporated: f/fkorn oa / Date: /a!u[h ~ PGP Page: 204 Attachment 7 (Cont.) l Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 96 l EPG Step Number (s): PC/P-7 PSGT Step Number (s): PC/P-6 Deviation: Containment venting instruction is not known at the present time. . . ~ _ i k Evaluator: C. S.' Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Will be addressed when PEls are written.
- 2 Reviewer
- C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 _,
. , ;_ Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: / / W ! are) ) Date: /Z '0/h-/ - Incorporated: [I td Date: edw (y 0% II l PGP Page: 205 Attachnent 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 97 EPG Step Number (s): SP/L-1 PSGT Step Number (s): SP/L-1 - Deviation: Sentence " Suppression pool makeup may be augmented by SPMS" was included. -- - Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 - . Justification: Perry design incorporates a suppression pool makeup system. Hence, the inclusion is warranted. d - Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer:
- Date:
Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: h hw ) Date: /2/$o/h(/ Incorporated: [/ tm / Date: et u d0 PGP Page: 206 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 98 EPG Step Number (s): SP/L-1; SP/L-3 PSGT Step Number (s): SP/L-1; SP/L-3 Deviation: Perry specific value for suppression pool level following SPMS initiation has been used in place of EPG value. _ Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference Perry specific calculation 11016-28, Kev. O. Reviewer: TA k Date: n Ii, isu . . . Approved: h NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: M d, Date: /2//9/f'/ , Approved: @ NO (circle one) CSO: h b.fj 9f j s Date: /4/Le'fy Incorporated [ 4% Date: / // /'/ 00 PGP Page: 207 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 99 EPG Step Number (s): SP/L-2 PSGT Step Number (s): SP/L-2 Deviation: Perry specific curve for Heat Capacity Level Limit used in place of EPG ___. curve. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference Perry specific calculation 11016-15, Rev. O. Reviewer: TA. h Date: v2.in i% Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: M A Date: /7/te //*' Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: //u[pxeyo' r Date /L[dc '/ Incor rated: h/ke, Date: /t[u[(f QQ PGP Page: 208 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 100 EPG Step Number (s): SP/L-3.2 PSGT Step Number (s): SP/L-3.2 Deviation: Perry specific value for Maximum Primary Containment Water Level Limit used in place of EPG value. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference Design Specification 660, Rsvision 7, S/2/83. _ _ . . _ _ Reviewer: N Date: blttI%v Approved:. NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: m [c. Date: /J//f!N Approved: h NO (circle one) GSO: w m Date: /l Ada '/ . Incorporated: h' gv Date: / L / OO I 4 b PGP Paga: 209 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines T Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 101 EPG Step Numbar(s): Secondary Containment Control Guideline PSGT Step Number (s): N/A Deviation: EPG " Secondary Containment Control Guidelines" was removed. r -
- Evaluator
- C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84
- Justification: The Perry secondary containment design does not require a separate guide-line. "'~ Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO h (circle on's) NDAS Lead Engineer: - Date: Approved: S .s . - NO (circle ona) GSO: YYb/jxern j Date: /2b? V Incorporated: { 00 ] Date: /L v 7 9 ) , . -- -.n. -s- , - - - - - . , - - , . , , - . - , - , .,,--,,,,,.---e, .,.,-n-,,,n-wm--,nv,,w,,,~,w-.,.--~n-en,.~,- , i PGP Page: 210 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 102 . EPG Step Number (s): Radioactivity Release Control Guideline - Entry Con-dition; RR-2 PSGT Step Number (s): Radioactivity Release Control Guideline - Entry Con- - - - dition; RR-Z Deviation: PSTG does not provide a specific value (in Ci/sec.) for the release rate which requires a specific Emergency Plan classification. 4 , Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: The Emergency Plan at~ Perry specifies several different release rates which would result in ' Alert or General Emergency classifications. Hence, listing only one of these could be possibly misleading. j' Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 ' Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: YES NO (circle one) GSO: / hMctM Datet /L 20 W Incorporated: h em , Date ,5<[h'
- oo l
,~,v ,-,,-m-,v,-.,---n-,,n -,-v-----,-v,w,- PGP Page: 211 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines v. Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 103 ( EPG Step Number (s): Cl-2 PSGT Step Number (s): Cl-1 Deviation: " Condensate" was changed to " Condensate /feedwater".
- Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification:
Provide consistency with other steps where condensate and feedwater , systems are molded into one system. Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date:
- Ap' proved:
' NO '(circle one) GSO: , I er d Date: /2 do d Incorporated: h/ -/ Date: I [(y' 0O w e- +- - , - . . . . - - -,,----.--v-w,-c-, +wa.e- .<,--.,,.,-.w.w- . . . , , . , *,,,r ,.,e,. ,,+=+.--.ye.-w- 3 vv ,-r- v PGP Page: 21,*. Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 104 EPG Step Number (s): Cl-2 PSGT Step Number (s): Cl-1 __ Deviation: Reference to LPCS A and LPCS B was changed to LPCS. _ _ , Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Perry design utilizes only one LPCS train. Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 _ Approved: YES NO h (circle one) .NDAS. Lead Engineer: Date: . Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: kW/ kmw _ Date: /2bOf'/ Incorporated: / erm/ Date: ' e (Y o6 i, , PGP Page: 213 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 105 EPG Step Number (s): Cl-2; C6-2.2; C6-3.1; C6-4; C7-2.2 PSGT Step Number (s): Cl-1; C6-1.3; C6-3.1; C6-4.1; C7-2.2 Deviation: List of alternate injection subsystems revised to reflect Perry design. J Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Evaluation of system capabilities indicates these systems can be used to . provide alternate means of injecting tanter into the RPV. , _ , _ ,_. Reviewer: Tk Date: clrt % _ tiproved: @ NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: M. d Date: /2//9!N Approved: CYES NO (circle one) GSO: f /Otkyyrs > Date: sL/>o/hd Incorporated: ((b,m/ Date: /s v 00 l l 1 PGP Page: 214 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 106 EPG Step Number (s): " Box" preceding Cl-4 PSGT Step Number (s): " Box" preceding Cl-2 _ Deviation: Location of " box" changed. . 4 - Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Relocation of the " box" improved the guidelines frcm a human factor stand point. In its previous position it could easily be missed if the operator had to loop back to step Cl-2 (which is likely to occur) . _ Reviewer: [,d ff. b h Date: 11/I"/99 _,, f Approved: (YJE NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: O. A Date: /3/30/// Approved: @ NO (circle one) GSO: b/ xY , e_ Date: /L be W Incorporated: h uv Date: /1!. v!(f 00 PGP Page: 215 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 107 - EPG Step Number (s): " Box" preceding Cl-4 PSGT Step Number (s): " Box" preceding Cl-2 .. Deviation: Perry specific value for ADS initiation setpoint used in place of EPG . _ , value. . _ _ Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference draf t Technical Specification Table 3.3.3-2. Reviewer: TA.h Date: - n li,iw Approved:' h NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: A' Date: /7//9/// . Approved: @ NO (circle one) GSO: Y hstLJ 4 Wj Date: /1. 0/W ' Incorporated': h *M, Date: ll!b // ' 5' O PGP Page: 216 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelinet. Deviation Sheet: Number 108 EPG Step Number (s): Cl-3 PSGT Step Number (s): Cl-2 Deviation: Perry specific value for division between the " Intermediate" and "High" pressure regions used in place of EPG value. Evaluatar: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justif1,:ation: Reference GE design specification data sheets 22A3125AM, Rev. 2, Section 4.1.2.b for LPCS; 22A3139AM, Rev. 7, for LPCI. These are preliminary values and may be revised based on results of pre-operational testing. Note also Deviation Sheets 40 and 41. Reviewe r: Tk, Date: n ll f l% Approved: h NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: M. d Date: /2//1'/8 Approved: @ NO (circle one) GSO: [ M /$ eru u Date: /2Me'/ </ Incorporated: h ,< w Date: i 2;[h ou PGP Page: 217 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 109 EPG Step Number (s): Cl-3 PSGT Step Number (s): Cl-2 Deviation: Determination of setpoint was expanded to include LPCI pumps as well as ~- the LPCS pump when calculating the division point between the "Interme- ~ diate" and "High" pressure regions. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 - Justification: , Accounts for the situation where the LPCS pump is inoperable. Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: S/ NO (circle one) GSO: . /f} //n/> g u A/ Date: /?be f Incorporated: ( ern/ Date: /3 / 00 PGP Page: 218 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 110 EPG Step Number (s): Cl-5; Cl-7 , PSGT Step Number (s): Cl-4; Cl-6 Deviation: Changed HPCI to HPCS. ..,__.i . Evaluator: C. S. Oroavany Date: ,f1/16/84 Justification: - . Since the step is concerned with not having a high pressure system avail- _ _, able to control RPV water level, HPCS was used in place of HPCI. . _ . _ i i Reviewer: C. S. Oroavany Date: 11/16/84 .. -Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: [S NO (circle one) , GSO: d A/ - U Date: // IO/!d . Incorporated : (Ibete Date: uby UC PGP Page: 219 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 111 EPG Step Number (s): Cl-8 PSGT Step Number (s): Cl-7 l Deviation: "If no HPCS or LPCS subsystem is operating" was included in the instruc- _ _ _ , , , tion. , , _ , Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Incorporation of- the phrase provides consistency with Contingency 4. Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer Date: Approved: [ NO (circle .one) GSO: fW c ' :nYV Date: /2-lb$. W Incorporated: [/ ~ m/ Date /* thf 00 . PGP Page: 220 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 112 EPG Step Number (s): C2-1.3 and elsewhere PSGT Step Number (s): C2-1.2; C6-1.2; C6-2; C6-3.1; C6-3.2; C6-3.3; C6-3.4 Deviation: EPG value for Minimum Number of SRVs required for Emergency Depressuri- , sation verified correct for Perry. _,_ _ ' Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Perry specific calculation performed by NSSS vendor. m Reviewer:- mmd Dete: /2 /7/rY t 4 r; - Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: c / M. Date: /c////// Approved:. h NO , (circle one) GSO: $?( / .at > Dates / Lib <?/5W .Incorporat d: hh Date: /t !h o0 PGP Page: 221 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the . Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 113 4 EPG Step Number (s): C2-1.3 PSGT Step Number (s): C2-1.2 _ {: Deviation: Phrase "and RPV pressure is at least . . . above suppression chamber pres-sure" was not included. , Evaluator: C. S. Oroavany Date: 11/16/84 4' Justification: The minimum SRV re-opening pressure is zero psig for SRVs used at Perry. Reference GE document 22A4622 AR, Rev. 5, Section 3.1.18.2.2. . Reviewer: bu -,,, Datet G.)U,kY. g- ,- Approved: - NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: [ Date: /2//f/N Approved: , NO (circle one) .GSo:. ///ued axJ Date: /14sbV +c.; rat.d: _ g&~00 / -t. : ss / - PGP , Page: 222 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 114 EPG Step Number (s): C2-2 PSGT Step Nunoer(s): C2-2 , Deviation: Reference to step RC/P-4 changed to RC/P-3. _ _ . ._
- I Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification:
This was done to better control the exit from the guidelines. As it was . _ previously written, the reactor shutdown checks would not be made. . Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Imad Engineer: Date: Approved: h NO '(circle one) GSO: fW Date: /L/2.0 GC/ Incorporated: /I few VO Dates v[h -ii ++ % IMAGE EVALUATION ((//gf $?, 4 q)ffy;h>9 TEs11AnoEr (ur-a) xy og[:ege +++ %'44 1.0 E!En E ii sm 5 l~f HE t: I.25 1.4 1.6 150mm # 6" #
- 4
+?h<y%//// ((Ds<$ 777 ;,3,ff- g & . a PGP Page: 223 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 115 i EPG Step Number (s): C3-1 PSGT Step Number (s): C3-1 Deviation: Perry specific value for Minimum Zero Injection RPV Water Level. used in place of EPG value. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference Perry specific calculation 11016-19, Rev. O. . Reviewer: I. Date: W h,194 Approved: NO' N/R '(cir lc e one) c NDAS Lead Engineer: . d' Date: /t//?/fY , Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: / w ./ Date: /2 .h. J ' Incorporated: cm/ Date: /1!2/!/Y 00 7 e- www~ m v- yw =wv-t my ree-<---tyw--- ,-w++*=geww y ,wc-- w-t=ww-,w'-y ey ,, m y + e w --y+- , + . . - -+eww ,y a, = vvga--w g y PGP Page: 224 Attachment 7 (Cont.) i Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 116 i EPG Step Number (s): C3-1 PSGT Step Number (s): C3-1 i Deviation: EPG value for Minimum Single SRV Steam Cooling Pressure verified correct for Perry. 1 1 Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference Perry specific calculation 11016-19, Rev. O. l Reviewer: 1 ,5 Date: \q li r I94 Approved: h NO N/R (circle one)' , NDAS Lead Engineer: A Date: /Z////// -Approved: h NO (circle one) GSO: / ej Date: /2 O/PV Incorporated: f- etm Date: /* oo l , ,, , .. , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . ~ . , , _ . . . ,,.......~.,,m... .._ _ ._.,....___,__. . . _ . - . . . . , . . . . . . _ . . . . . PGP Page: 225 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines ; Deviation Sheet: Number 117 EPG Step Number (s): C4-2 PSGT Step' Number (s): C4-2 l Deviation: f Perry specific value for the lower of:RPV pressure for rated LPCS or HPCS
- flow used in place of EPG value.
l Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany .Date: 11/16/84 Justificatton: Reference GE process diagrams E22-1020 762E455 Rev. 6, and E21-1020 762E476C Rev. 3; GE documents 22A3131AS Rev. 3, section 4.1.2.c and _ ' 22A3125AM Rev. 2, section 4.1.2.a. These values are preliminary and may be revised pending results of pre- operational testing. Reviewer: b ea,I Date: /1!/~/!W
- Approved: NO N/R (circle one)
NDAS Lead Engineer: Y[ d Date: /2//9/// Approved: CYES NO (circle one) =GSO: / s Date: /?MO/ M 4 Incorporated: / xv Date: /1 u!h 00 1- . -...-, ,_.- , _ ._ - ,._ _. - -.,, _ . .._-_ - . I ._ -- PGP Page: 226 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 118 ' EPG Step Number (s): Contingency 5 PSGT Step Number (s): N/A Deviation: Contingency 5 is not incorporated in the PSTGs. 4 Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 _ . Justification: , Alternate Shutdown Cooling was only entered after it had been determined that Normal Shutdown Cooling was unavailable. In actual practice the i- equipment lineup that is utilized to depressurize and cool down the reactor system to below the Shutdown Cooling interlocks.is continued until normal operation of the Shutdown Cooling Syrtes is reestablished. I Cooldown to cold shutdown can be achieved as long as the main condenser can receive discharges from either the main steam lines or the Reactor ' Water Cleanup System . Virtually the only emergency condition for which I' Alternate Shutdown Cooling will be needed is that in which the main con-i denser is ' out of service and there is an unisolable break. In this situ-ation raising RPV water level and pressure above the Safety Relief Valve reopening pressure in the procedure for Alternate Shutdown Cooling makes the situation worse. For this reason it was decided that Alternate Shut-down Cooling is not the appropriate action to take for this emergency and . - should not be included in the emergency procedures. l Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date:- 11/16/84 f l-Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: h - NO (circle one) GSO: . ffd Md C . Date: /2./LO / / (/ // Incorporated: /Ib,% . Date: //2//f 06 t , . - ._. __._ .- ,_ _ . . _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ , _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . . . . . _ _ ~ PGP Page: 227 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 119 EPG Step Number (s): C6-2 PSGT Step Number (s): C6-1; C6-3 Deviation: Phrase ". . . flood tne RPV as follows:" was added. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Provides clarificawtion as to the overall intent of the step. Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany bate: 11/16/84 Approved: YES- NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: S NO (circle one) GSO: M! M //tafd Date: /2.dO/e/ Incorporated: [I[Arv 90 Date: iL[w[h i i m PGP Page: 228 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 120 EPG Step Number (s): C6-2.1 PSGT Step Number (s): " Box" preceding C6-1.1 Deviation: Phrase "... and RPV flooding is not required." was removed. , Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 3 ' Justification: With the inclusion of item 2, both plant conditions which require RPV flooding are specified, therefore the phrase is superfluous. s i Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 _ Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: l- Approved: - YES - NO (circle one) GSO: h h/gY& _ > Date: J?. /b d ' / Incorporated: {/Mnm Date: / v[fy 40 1 l i L. _ PGP Page: 229 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 121 EPG Step Number (s): C6-2.1 PSGT Step Number (s): " Box" preceding C6-1.1 Deviation: " Containment pressure can be maintained below the Primary Containment . Design Pressure" uns added. - Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: This is the other plant condition which can require RPV Flooding. Hence, its inclusion removes the need to stipulate that RPV Flooding is not required. Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: ks*eg _n Date: /Lke P/ Incorpor ted: [//Mw./ > n Date: / d!(y ~ I ( - . ~ . - . - . . . , . - , _ . - . - , . - - - , -, ., , , , - _ , . , , , , - . , - - . - . . , . ~ . . - , _ , - . . . , , - , . _ . . , , - . - . - , . , - PGP Page: 230 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 122 EPG Step Number (s): C6-4 PSGT Step Number (s): " Box" preceding C6-3.1 Deviation: Decision point added. 4 Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Depending on whether RPV Flooding was required because RPV water level was unknown or because primary containment pressure was greater than design, the operator is directed to one of two instructions, rather than -both. l Reviewer: C. S. Oregva'ny Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: Ydec/ x , Date: / Lko d Incorporate : [/fN.s , Date: n [N *6 i l I PGP
- Page
- 231 Attachment 7 (Cont.)
Deviations from the , Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 123 i EPG Step Number (s): C6-2.1; C7-2.1
- PSGT Step Number (s):
4
- Deviation:
Perry specific valves for Minimum Alternate RPV Flooding Pressure used in place of EPG valves. ._ 4 Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference Perry specific calculation 11016-21, Rev. O. Reviewer: med Date: /2 //y!r*/ rj- - 1 Approved: NO N/R (circle cac) NDAS Lead Engineer: A Date: #//9/// Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: fd Her - Date: R 'Ob / Incorporated: h her, Date: /1[v!N o4 t , .. , . - . . , - - _ . _ , - . - . . - , - - . . - , . - , - -. . - - - _ . . . _ , . . , . . . . - . - - - , - . - , , ..~ t PGP Page: 232 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines t Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 124 EPG Step Number (s): C6 -2.1 and elsewhere i + PSGT Step Number (s): ~C6-1.1; C6-1.3; C6-1.4; C7-2.1 l Deviation: I Perry specific value for minimum number of SRVs for which the Minimum l Alternate RPV Flooding Pressure is below the lowest SRV lif ting pressure used in place of the EPG value. i l Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 . Justification: Reference Perry specific calculation 11016-21, Rev. O. i leviewer: -. 1 Date: /1//7/v*/ ff f i Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: k. A Date: //////// 4 - Approved: @ NO - (circle one) . GSO: / lr -> Date: J2 CA Incorporated: st % Date: /2 ts! d( 4 -+ , -r--- ,, -w,-,,-r-, , - - , - . , n, v n_na n. e ~ e,-- y-a ,v n g n e-..-r . , , m, mew PGP Psgs: 233 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines
- Deviation Sheet
- Numbe r 125
[ EPG Step Number (s): C6-1 PSGT Step Number (s): Co-1.2 4 Deviation: . Phrase "... or if HPCS or motor driven feedwater pumps are available for injection." was removed. i i l' Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 i .. Justification: The' condition for a HPCS or feedwater pump available does not necessarily 4 apply to the AWS situation since it cannot be determined if either or ~
- both pumps will provide suf ficient RP7 injection flow to handle makeup
~ for a given AWS power level. For this reason, these words are deleted from C6-1.2. As long as the minimum number of SRVs required for emer-gency depressurization can be opened it is assumed that low pressure ECCS can provide adequate core cooling and therefore need for a high pressure, high capacity pump is removed. ~ Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: fY fdbMtYr ' x Date: )A fdG Incorporated: [ buv UO Date & N I . - - , -, ,,,,--,_,w--rr-r-,,-,--,y.- , - , ,.,,,.--%-.----,,--+wer.y--,-w,,,-www,e.,-,--,w-wy,-,-~w-3.w,,v,--r--m-,, PGP Page: 234 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 126 EPG Step Number (s): C6-2.2; C7-2.2 PSGT Step Number (s): C6-1.3; C7-2.2 - Deviation: LPCI not included in first list of systems. It was, however, added to i second list of systems. t ~ f i i Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Criteria for first list was the ability of the system to inject outside the shroud, which LPCI does not. Reference FSAR Section 6.3.2.2.4. No such restriction exists for second list. Reviewer M u ,,,k Date: /2/17/(*/ .q I 't ' Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Imad Engineer: /[. Date: # f # Approve h .NO (circle one) GSO: Vl x_- Date: j2 o Z Incorporated: h et N Dates i u[ ! Oo i -r --+ -------r-------.* y ,ve.,r--.- v.,, w,,.-rv...,-eenem,-,,,,-,,=,,,v- . w- e m -m - nr e , w w.. --- m , v . mm .%%.- w PCP Page: 235 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 127 EPG Step Number (s): C6-2.3 and elsewhere PSGT Step Number (s): C6-1.4; C6-3.2; C6-4.2 Deviation: Phrase " Control injection to . . ." was added; ". . . but as low as practi-cable." was deleted. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Removes ambiguity. Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES N0 h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: . Approved:- h NO (circle one) GSO:' s YW cru' -> Date: /2 '0 Incorporated: [//('d.,s / / Date: it[n V UG PGP Pzgn: 236 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 128 EPG Step Number (s): C6-2.4 PSGT Step Number (s): C6-1.5 Deviation: Phrase ". .. the reactor is shutdown and no boron has been injected into the RPV." was removed. , Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: The operator may not be capable of making this decision unless all rods ,, are inserted. In succeeding steps, cooldown of the reactor will add positive reactivity and the operator can not know whether this will cause , , the reactor to go critical again. \ ,. Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Imad Engineer: Date: Approved: E NO (circle one) GSO: / f't V brW ' / Date: R / o Incorporated: f//8 .N Date: /t [H , 00 - .---. ,----.-..aa. . , - - , , ~ , ,----w..,...,, ., ---- PCP Psga: 237 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 129 EPG Step Number (s): N/A PSGT Step Number (s): " Box" preceding C6-3.1 ' Deviation: " Box" was added. d Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 , Justification: d P:ovides direction to operator on what to do if water level can subse-E quently be determined. s .y. 1 ~ Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES N0 h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer Dates - ~ Approved: NO (circle one) ! GSO: !/ '[r hurf t > u Date: /L/2.0 Incorporated: [Ib / Date: , uH O4 l [ ] } --n--~,m-n-,--m,-.r,-rr,-,, --r-,-m.,-.--,-n-,n. ~~,-,,v, - sw -- --n e - , - - - , - - , , . - - , , . . ~ .,,,,.n.. r, ,m.--,-,----n,,,,-, PCP Prgs: 238 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 130 EPG Step Number (s): C6-3.1 PSGT Step Number (s): C6-3.1; C6-3.2 Deviation: f Perry specific value for Minimum RPV Flooding Pressure used in place of , _ EPG value. , Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 _ Justification: Reference Perry specific calculation 11016-22, Rev. O. em.=+ a-+- Reviewer: m. ,1 Date: /2//7/f4/ Approved: NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: - M Date: /7//9///' Approved: NO (circle one) CSO: [ MM d Dates /2 0 4' ~ Incorporated: h /[ nm Date: /t!v!N OO _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . ._ . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ , _ . - - ~ ___ _.. _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . . ._ PGP Page: 239 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the ., Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 131 EPG Step Number (s): N/A PSGT Step Number (s): C6-3.5 Deviation: The concept of Minimum Core Flooding Interval has been developed and a Perry specific curve has been calculated. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Calculations were performed by NSSS vendor and are to be considered pre-limina ry. Reviewer , ,1 Date: /J,!/7/(Y q t t Approved: YE NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Imad Engineer . de Date: ////9/rV Approved: h NO (circle one) GSO: / /vvad ,_ Date: /d [0 , Incorporated: vf % Dater / v!/9 0U r-PGP Page: 240 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 132 E?G Step Number (s): C6-5.4 PSGT Step Number (s): C6-3.6 Deviation: Bounding curve for Maximum Core Uncovery Time Limit has been used instead of the EPG curve. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: _ Bounding calculation performed by NSSS vendor. - l Reviewer: [ um.d Date: /2//T/T'/ Approved: g, i - NO N/R (circle one) OYES NDAS Lead Engineer: [ A Date: /2//f/N Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: / hrW,Y ,b Date: /d bo V Incorporated: ,t m , 00 Dater n!u!/r a PGP Page: 241 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 133 EPG Step Number (s): " Box" preceding C7-1 PSGT Step Number (s): " Box" preceding C7-1 .- Deviation: Rewritten, deleting reference to Flow Stagnation Power Level. Eval'uator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: . Since Stagnation Power was only being used as backup indication for reactor water level in the event normal unter level indication systems ~ are 1ost, it was decided to remove all reliance on it from the guideline. Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 f- : Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Dates Approved: S NO (circle one) - GSO: / . [> v , Date: /2 /20 ! -Incorpo ated: un , Od Date: bh i i PGP Page: 242 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 134 EPG Step Number (s): C7-1 PSGT Step Number (s): C7-1 Deviation: Actions to be taken in the event an MSIV was open were added. --~. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 < Justification: Water level will be deliberately lowered to near the RPV water level which will cause the MSIVs to isolate. Closure of the MSIVs is to be avoided because it is desirable to retain the main condenser as a heat ,, sink rather than use the suppression pool. Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: S - NO (circle one) GSO:' / / < Date: /c' /$d/[ Incorporated: 8/M2xv Date: / u fy oo a * +-e r-m+ -- - ++--y-*-m ,ser-w--, * ,- e - , e t w e w s e w m w w-w __,e ,--- c r~r --- m . se m w w e-+ g- rv PGP Page: 243 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 135 EPG Step Number (s): C7-1 PSGT Step Number (s): C7-1 Deviation: Setpoint referenced to top of active fuel is now referred to as the Flow _. Stagnation Water Level. ___ _. e Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: The Flow Stagnation Water Level is that RPV water level at which natural circulation flow in the RPV stagnates. Hence, reducing RPV water level below this point will not further reduce core flow (and core power) to any significant degree. Reviewer: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: Approved: S NO (circle one) GSO: /t gax; e Date: /? /Io d Incorporated: [ N ,e n / ~ Date: 4 u !lt 00 . - ~ _ , , . - - . ~ . . . < - ._v c-- , - - - - ..,~ .-4 ,- - - - , - - - PGP Page: 244 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 136 EPG Step Number (s): N/A PSGT Step Number (s): C7-1 _ Deviation: Perry specific value for Flow Stagnation Water Level has been calculated. __ Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference Perry specific calculation 11016-25, Rev. O. Reviewer: 1m e,k Dates d,/ /7 W Approved: o-NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: M M Date: ////9/JV Approve - h NO (circle one) GSO: / M & _ Date: /4 O/O Incorporated: hI w Dates / fy 00 PGP Page: 245 Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 137 EPG Step Number (s): C7-3 PSGT Step Number (s): C7-3 Deviation: Perry specific value for Hot Boron Shutdown Weight used in place of EPC _ value. . _ _ _ Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reference Perry specific calculation 11016-24, Rev. O. Reviewer: f' um Date: /J,//r./f4 Approved: h NO N/R (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer: Date: ///2d/# Approved: NO (circle one) GSO: ,M ew v Date: /2 4/ / Incorporated: O//d,% Date: /1fu _ 06 ,.4 _ . , ~ . . y - . ,.. ._,,-~m.. PGP Psg1i: 246 - LAST Attachment 7 (Cont.) Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Numbe r 138 - IAST EPG Step Number (s): C7-4 - PSGT Step Number (s): C7-4 ,, Deviation: Wording was changed. Evaluator: C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Justification: Reflects Deviation Sheet 45; exit to proceed to cold shutdown is per-mitted only through RC/P. Reviewers C. S. Orogvany Date: 11/16/84 Approved: YES NO h (circle one) NDAS Lead Engineer Date: Approved: S NO (circle one) GSO: Y/ h </l5 Dete:lElC4 V Incorporatted: tre m / Dates a M d0 ..}}