ML20108F462

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Initiation of Reload Analysis Re Cycle 10 Core for Facility.Insertion of part-length Neutron Absorber Rods in Cycle 10 Core Will Result in Changes to Reload Methodology & Tech Specs.Figure Showing Assembly Locations Encl
ML20108F462
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 03/06/1985
From: Andrews R
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To: John Miller
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
LIC-85-051, LIC-85-51, NUDOCS 8503120443
Download: ML20108F462 (4)


Text

_

Omaha Public Fower District 1623 HarnetJ Omaha Nebraska 68102 402/536 4000 March 6,1985 LIC-85-051 l

Mr. James R. Miller, Chief Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Division of Licensing Operating Reactors Branch No. 3 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555

Reference:

Docket No. 50-285

Dear Mr. Miller:

Fort Calhoun Cycle 10 Reload The Omaha Public Power District is currently initiating reload analyses associated with our Cycle 10 core for Fort Calhoun Station. The Cycle 10 core is being designed to further reduce the flux to reactor vessel belt line welds. The enclosed figure shows the assemblies in which part-length neutron absorber rods will be placed. These assemblies are the primary neutron sources for the reactor vessel welds that have re-ceived the greatest neutron fluence in the past. The assembly locations in which the part-length neutron absorber rods are placed may be varied from cycle to cycle to optimize the neutron flux reduction to the welds.

The part-length neutron absorber rods will be similar in design to CEA fingers.

The B C neutron absorber stack is axially centered at the core 4

midplane and has a length equivalent to 507, of the active core height.

The insertion of the part-length neutron absorber rods in the Cycle 10 core will result in increases to radial peaking factors, FRT and Fxy,

T which will require changes to the District's approved reload methodology and the Fort Calhoun Station Technical Specifications.

These changes are discussed in the following paragraphs.

Approved Reload Topical:

OPPD-NA-8301-P, " Omaha Public Power District, Nuclear Analysis, Reload Core Analysis Methodology Overvi ew."

Anticipated Changes l

l 1

The part-length neutron absorber rod design will be j

included in the Fuel System Design section by reference i

to the appropriate report. This report will be pre-pared by the absorber rod designer and manufacturer et (Combustion Engineering) and will document the design O

gk of the rods using currently approved methodologies.

(e.

G This report will be included in our reload core evaluation submittal.

p B503120443 850306 4s ss24 PDR ADOCK 05000205 ent with Eaual opportunity P

PDR Maie/remaie

o.

LIC-85-051 Page Two Anticipated Changes (Continued) 2.

The anticipated increase in the value of the integrated T

R, will necessitate a change radial peaking factor, F in the DNBR associated LSSS and LCO. To accommodate the increased peak, the District plans to change the existing "early system" TM/LP trip module at Fort Cal-4 houn. Station to a " standard system" TM/LP module. The

" standard system" incorporates the ASI in the calcula-tion of this PVAR equation. Changes to the LSSS set-point methodnlogy will be incorporated into the topical report by the appropriate reference to CENPD-199, Rev.

1-P.

The District also intends to use the incore detector system to monitor the DNBR LCO. The system will be similar to the Better Axial Shape Selection System described in CENPD-199, Rev.1-P.

The District will submit the appropriate revisions to the approved topical report and appropriate references.

Approved Reload Topical: OPPD-NA-8302-P, " Omaha Public Power District, Nuclear Analysis, Reload Core Analysis Methodology, Neutronics Design Methods and Verification."

Anticipated Changes: No changes to this topical report are anticipated.

i Approved Reload Topical: OPPD-NA-8303-P, " Omaha Public Power District, Nuclear Analysis, Reload Core Analysis Methodology, Transient and Accident Methods and Verification."

Anticipated Changes:

No changes to this topical report are anticipated.

Technical Specifications Anticipated Changes:

Section 1.3 Change to reflect installation of " standard system" 4

TM/LP module.

l I

Section 2.10.4(1)(a)

Insert provision for directly monitoring LHR using the i

new LCO monitoring system similar to the Better Axial Shape Selection System.

i Section 2.10.4(2)

Delete the Tq tenn and add requirement that FRT is measured using a full core power distribution map.

i i

l

. - -. ~. ~, -,. - _ - - - - _ _ ~

LIC-85-051 Page Three Anticipated Changes: (Continued)

Section 2.10.4(3)

Delete the Tq tenn and add requirement that FxyT is measured using a full core power distribution map.

Section 2.10.4(4)

Make this section applicable only when monitoring LHR and DNBR LCO's using the excore detectors.

Section 2.10.4(5)

Insert provision for monitoring the DNB LC0 using the new LCO monitoring system similar to Better Axial Shape Selection System and make current specifications appli-cable when new system is not operational.

The District previously committed to providing reactor vessel fluence distributions with future reloads. The District has recently undertaken extensive investigations to detennine the chemical compositon of the reactor vessel welds whose RTNDT is expected to exceed the PTS screening criteria prior to the expiration of the Fort Calhoun license. Until these investigations are complete we do not believe it is appropriate to perfonn additional vessel fluence calculations, and we do not plan to submit fluence distribution infonnation with the_ Cycle 10 reload core safety evaluation.

In accordance with Generic Letter 84-20, the District will submit the changes to our approved topical reports six months prior to the Cycle 10 restart date. The reload core safety evaluation and associated Techni-cal Specification changes will be submitted three months prior to the Cycle 10 restart date. The Cycle 10 restart is currently scheduled for the first week of December 1985.

IhlA(U R. L. Andrews Division Manager Nuclear Production RLA/JKG/1p Enclosure cc:

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C 20036 E. G. Tourigny, Project Manager L. A. Yandell, Senior Resident Inspector

CYCLE 10 LOCATION OF PART LENGTH NEUTRON ABSORBER RODS i

00 X

X X

X X

X X

X 0o, m

X X

X X

X X

X X

0 180 1

X Part Length Neutron Absorber Rods i

(One in each corner guide tube)

-w

- mv e--

e, - - ---


m----,e,e

,---,--.,,.e