ML20105C138

Forwards Constituents R & C Burch Ltr Re Cracks in Base Mat, for Response

ML20105C138
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	07/06/1983
From:	Long G HOUSE OF REP.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL AFFAIRS (OCA)
Shared Package
ML20105C134	List: ML20105C133 ML20105C138 ML20112J591
References
FOIA-84-498 NUDOCS 8308180638
Download: ML20105C138 (6)

Text

,

8 N W 8 " "*"- '

2,,m...

-- o..m _

+

.s

,*L (2 C2,22 5-4 3 2 4

_ ' ~CowurmE muus Contrregg of t e Entteb sbtates

,;","J.",Ot

--4 u

w e~~ m u-1m

~

. <-- ".,:m-- s

..~ in., m JotMT ECO COMMf7 TEE CM ST E S DXT E!bLdjingtett, B.C. 20515 b

,.t' MEMORANDUM TO THE OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL RELATIONS Enclosed is a copy of a letter I recently received fiom one of my constituents which concerns a matter under the jurisdiction of your-agency.

I'would be most grateful for your advice and assistance concerning the attached communication.

Should you require any additional information, please call h'illiam Meaux of my staf f at (202) 225-4926.

Thank you very much.

GILLIS LONG MEMBER OF CONGRESS Eighth Congressional District Louisiana 7/13..To EDO for ct Reply.. Suspense: July 22. 0CA to Ack. 83-2035

~

,Y o2P A,

( ;.

.s.

3

.y.

s 8

C

.t q.

....e

.g

_. s.e

u....

.e...-sa

.o r...

, e. e c. r.a.,. y r

o-Nuclear Regult ory Co:nnission i.

.. '2 '. c '2..e.

O-?'.<"a c' C o. 3. e c _e '_ m... c _

~~

KEshing cn, D.C.

20555

+

f Secause cf the desire cf this cifice te be respcnsive te.all inquiries e.nd ecr.nunications, your censiceration cf the atteched is

,.'y.' W.

. req 0ested.

Your finc.ings anc views, in s-

..e. :/

.'.*f.

.?

duplica e ic

, alcng with return cf the enciesure, will be appreciated by

- e...

....-w.,

.... ~..

s,

v..

,... s. : ;

j

~

c s

a. r s 1-Ie

(

t..e.. c.

l 7/27..To EDO for Direct Reply.. Suspense: Aug 5.. 0CA to Ack 83-2092 3

.=c E.2 x.-

...e..

... s,.

. =

.;.: a.

... w.,..............

2 ;

-r..,.m:.:,. : y_..y

.v..

.....m

..s.;

,_u

.....:...:... :e......

.s.

,. e.....

., -,......... -... ~

...,..n.

.... ~..

e...

.n...<,...

.2-;.

m.-..

c

..,. +.

..........#........e..

.: ~..<... -:r. :.;:,.. r...:...

~:

.......; c-w: ;,.1,3.. p.."..'.;..,e ;_;-

....w M.. n. '.;<.i.iM..

...., s.-3.,v,.:.-o,.

a...~,.....u.

.s

.. ; a.

..... s..:e c.

,..z,.

1

,.;,. a :. :,..,t

... x...

... m:

..u.

.,.r..

t...

...s....-..

.~

1. ~

2.-..

^'

., g:y.

'w. -;-..

i

r. -

q..

3

-u l

~-=-

.. t,, ~.

v

.=

r 7.. -

Dear Concerned Public Officer:

Would you want a nuclear power plant with a s-cracked slab in your neighborhood?

We don't and we don't think you would either.

Waterford 3 has a cracked slab!

Will the slab crack and result in a -Louisiana disaster?

Even a

. ~ ' '

low probability is too high a possibility.

Once Waterford 3 is' fueled, the consuner vill be assigned the responsibility for paying for Waterford'3, cracked slab and all.

They could be paying for their own destruction.

5 If the crack in the. slab propagates, the. plant vill have to be shut down.

Then the custoners of LP&L vill have to pay not only for the constructian, but also for the disnantling of Waterford 3.

Why should the custoner have to pay for the nistakes of L?&L canagenent?

.STOP WATERFORD 3 NOW, befcre it is fueled.

Avert the physical or financial disaster that is sure to follow.

Let LF&L pay for its manage-nent nistakes.

Sincerely,

/M A--

-