ML20105C133

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Constituents R & C Burch Ltr Expressing Concern Re Cracks in Plant Foundation Slab,For Findings
ML20105C133
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/20/1983
From: Long R
SENATE
To: Kammerer C
NRC OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL AFFAIRS (OCA)
Shared Package
ML20105C134 List:
References
FOIA-84-498 NUDOCS 8308180621
Download: ML20105C133 (2)


Text

I'#

9)CnLb ,Sfafes ,Sencdc wAssiscTos, o.c. zosio h P3- d /o / ,

July 20, 1983 Mr. Carlton fammerer, Director ~

Office of Congressional Relations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1717 H S.treet,

~

N.W. -

Washington, D.C. 20555~ .

Dear Mr. Kammerer:

I have enc;1osed correspond.ence' I received f rom Mr. and Mrs. Ronald Burch expressing concern'about the cra'cked slab at the Waterford III nuclear. power plant.

I am aware that the. Nuclear Regulatory Commission e.Y has investigated the cracked slab at Waterford III on '

- a t least two occa sions. I b~elieve the most recent .

investiga tion wa s ma de. this yea r. I would appreciate your looking into this matter and providing me with a '

report.

With every good wish, I am Si erely yours, .

RBL:bg Enclosure

'7/29...To EDO for Direct Reply.. Suspense: Aug 8.. 0CA to Ack. 83-2104 e

- ( .

T; . . .

/ ,y 4 , , . - -

.- i

  • ~

Eii p - . ...

. . . . Ic. . r- -

d

Dear C. ouperned.- Public. Ofiicer:

t a. hu~ clear': power plantWe with a Would you van don't.

.cracted slab in your "n'ei~ghborhood? h Waterford

. . : .tud .ve. .a don c r'a'c'k W :think you would eit er .Will the slab crack edslab!

3 has Even a and r.es. ult in a1is lov probability Louisiana too highdisaster? a possibility. '

E'on shneM ' vill Once be

Water'fofd'.3 'is:fud16dTh ,e ythe: assigned f,h

~

~ -

Vaterf ord 3, cracked slab and all. - '.' ~

could, be paying for their own destruction. crack in If the -

vill-have to be' shut:.dosm - Then the custoners of L?icL vill! hav~e. tb. pay

  • no't; only f oY :the

~

~ ~ ,

~

but. also Ior the dismantling. -

construetion',of Waterf ord' 3. ' 'Why 'should- the fcustoner hav 3

pay for the nistakes of L?&L nanagenent?

1 STOP Avert the WATERFORD 3' NON,' bef ore it is fue Le t L? EL pey f or its nanage-41-,

is sure to follovJ nent nistakes. .

~

Sincerely, ,

b

- &') ,

wh .

~ /  :

./j / - .

.* e

\_ .

D s

[

.