ML20102C334
| ML20102C334 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 03/01/1985 |
| From: | Eddleman W, Eddlemen W EDDLEMAN, W. |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| CON-#185-882 82-468-01-OL, 82-468-1-OL, OL, NUDOCS 8503050518 | |
| Download: ML20102C334 (1) | |
Text
D
/
'Q UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION r
a M -5 A11 :11 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING B0bfif[d sISN Glenn O. Bright "Eh Dr. James H. Carpenter James L. Kelley, Chairman In the Matter of CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT CO. et al.
)
(Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant,
)
Unit 1)
)
ASLBP Ho. 82-h68-01
)
OL Motion to Reconsider re Contention 57-C-7 I inderstand the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in case 8h-1091 (12 February 1985) reversing the Nuclear Regulatory Connission decision in Snn Onofre (on which this Board evidently relied in liniting the adnission of contention 57-C-7) that a list of hosnitals able to treat contaninated injured radiation victins in and energency response plan is sufficient.
The Court said, "For the reasons stated we reject as irrational the NRC's generic interpretation of section 50.h7(b)(12) with respect to members of the public exposed to dangerous levels of radiation.
Accordingly we vacate the disnositions, on review 88' og that state or
. apply the generic interpretation and renand uo
\\
eg this matter to the agency for further consideration j
i consistent with this opinion."
This would appear to void og, the Board's rulying limiting admission of 57-C-7 due to NRC's no CSO San Onofre decision.
Therefore I ask to Board to reconsider and admit Contention 57-C-7 as originally draf ted (or appropriately nodified consistent M,]
with the Court of Appeals ' decisioQ/g s Eddleman