ML20102A164
| ML20102A164 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zimmer |
| Issue date: | 09/22/1983 |
| From: | Johnson P TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY |
| To: | Rehm T NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20102A048 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-151, FOIA-84-176 NUDOCS 8502080166 | |
| Download: ML20102A164 (13) | |
Text
_-
,'t
}f
' fAlf CIPAL STAFF Ar 1 A4 tr:F 7'
4 l-TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY I/RFU CCs 3
PO. Cox 85608 v
A/r(4]
y;g)
San Dego, Cat.forn:a 92120 Telephone: (619) 455-2654 pgp l
i;g g
A ovis.on os fiA Technologies Inc.
5g3) i)E '
4 N1L l
OL lF 1 LE, Mll 1 i
September 22, 1983 U.S. Nuclear Regahtory Commission Atta: Mr. Th; mas A. Rechm Assistant for Operations Office of Executive Director for Operations Room 6709 7735 Old Georgetown Road Bethesda, MD 20814
Subject:
Presentation to the NRC Commissioners on the Independent Review of Zimmer Project Management, September 28, 1983 s
Dear Mr. Reahm:
Enclosed is a copy of the material prepared by Torrey Pines Technology for the presentation to the NRC Commissioners on September 28, 1983.
Very truly yours, hq/w
/
Patricia M. Johnson Secretary to George L. Wewman Director Enclosure cc:
Mr. J. G. Keppler NRC-Glen Ellyn, Illinois Mr. W. H. Dickhoner Cincinnati Gas Sc Electric Company 7
_,,---~n---
..-.--c
,--,a-,
T N
E M
S W
E R
E G
3 I
E V
A 8
N N
E N
9 O
O R
A 1
IT E S E M
I A H S H T 82 T T T N F T I
N M
E O C r
E O MN D E
e b
S T O O N J
E E
O me R
C P
R t
E P
p P
C e
R D
S N
R N
E I
M M
IZ YL I
0%
t N
SfED N
MH =
a 9
9 s
INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ZIMMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT i
I PROGRAM APPROACH 1
l OVERVIEW
/
PROGRAM PLAN DATA GATHERING
- CONCLUSIONS j
o 10 Tasks Defined o > 60 Mansnanths (Tasks B thru G)
(Tasks A thru K) o > 3200 Docs. Reviewed 1
i o > 100 Interviews Data Retrieval System o
> CASE STUDIES (Task H)
> EV LUATION OF
} RECOMMENDATIONS &
o Confirmed Conclusions ALTERNATIVE REPORT (Task K) from Other Tasks ORGANIZATIONS (Taak J) 11MEY MNES 1TOfN0tDGY
.-=%=
_z_
g.
9*
1 INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ZIMMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT Program Approach Task Descriptions i
ADMINISTRATIVE DATA GATIIERING CONFIRMING DATA o Task A - Manage and o Task B - Evaluate o Task H - Evaluate Direct Project Project Structure, Management Actions Staffing, Policies in Selected Case 4
and/or Procedures Studies i
1 j
o Task C - Evaluate Manage-ssent Policies, Involvement and Commitment Toward i
Quality Assurance
\\
o Task D - Evaluate Quality Assurance Program i
Management o Task E - Evaluate Quality Confirmation Program i
e Management o Task F - Evaluate Manage-ment Methods for Control of Work of Major Sub-contractors and Suppliers I
o Task G - Evaluate Proce-dures and Methods for the Transition from Construction W40tEY to Operations l'INES
'IIDf'ORDGY
. ======
- w. -
g J
\\
j
~
f i
INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ZIMMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT l
PROGRAM APPROACH TASK DESCRIPTION (Continued)
~
i EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORT i
o TASK J o
TASK K
- Contemporary Nuclear Project Analysis i
4
- Review of Task B thru H Results 0
- Evaluation of 16 Alter-l native Organizational Arrangements
)
11NIN N
.- = % m y
O Y
INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ZIMMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT REVIEW PROCESS 4
o SCOPE DEFINED 4
- Review Managensent
- Determine Organizational Changes Required
- No Technical Review of Adequacy
- No Physical Inspection of the Plant o
PROGRAM PLAN
- Scope Reviewed and Agreed with NRC at Public Meetings
- TPT Independence Established
- Individual Investigators Filed Independence Statements A
- Co===ications in Accordance with NRC Protocol 10 REY PfNFS 1 TON 0tILY
.- e4 %==.
9
3 f
INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ZIMMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT l
REVIEW PROCESS (Continued)
I l
o FOR EACH TASK
- Task Leader Plus Two-Three Researchers
- Procedures Written I
- Interview Checklists as Needed I'
- Interviews
- Documents Reviewed i
- San = nary Report i
i o
DOCUMENTATION i
- Interviews Documented 0
- Related Documentation Obtained
- Data Cross Checked by Comparison of Different Interviews with Available Documentation
- Interviews and Docurnents Filed in TPT Offices
' 1t*nY (1NES 11DfN0tDGY e4 % m g*
t
h INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ZIMMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT
(
EVALUATION / REPORT PROCESS
]'
t No Predetermined Conclusions or Recommendations o
i j
Each Reviewer Performed Task in Accordance with Program o
Plan and Procedures Reliance on Individual Reviewer's Judgment Based on o
Education, Training, and Experience TPT Team Members Met Daily to Exchange Information and o
Evaluate Data initial Conclusions Reviewed with Task Imader and Program Manager o
Sa===ry Evaluations for Each Task Prepared by Task Imader o
i and Team Members 4
1 Case Studies Used to Cross Check Broad Project Management o
Characteristics Observed in Other Tasks o
Alternative Organizational Structures Evaluated by Task o
Leaders and Program Manager i
I Final Report Drafts Reviewed by Task Leaders o
Each Observation / Conclusion in Final Report Trackable 4
o l
to Data in TPr Files Final Report Reviewed by Program Manager /TPT Management o
i armny l'INFS 1
IMN
.-.,m=
a
_7_
INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ZIMMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS o
MAJOR Top Level CG&E Organization for the Ziammer Project Key Recoaunendations on Top Management Key Reca==nandations on Project Management
. Key Progr===== tic Recommendations o
DETAILED I
Suggested Organization and Responsibility of
{
Each of the Major Project Subgroups I
o Approximately 100 Recommendations from All Areas Examined Typical are Organization of Overall "-cche, Details of QVP, Integrated System for Scheduling and Cost Control and Training i
N 'Y HNI5 g.
1TDfN0tDGY u %==.
T
- e g
c, INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ZIMMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT Proposed Zimmer Project Organizat on i
4 CG&E BOARD OFDIRECTORS I
1 I
CG8E PRES 10ENT ZIMMER PROJECT OVERSIGHT e
AND CEO COMMITTEE II[
i I
.4 i
I I
I EXECUTIVE a
l VICE PRESIDENT 3
ZIMMER PROJECT 3
MANAGER I
j l
THIR0 PARTY I
REVIEW / AUDIT i
I I
I l
I o
l MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER ANAGER MANAGER I
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION QA OPERATIONS ADMINISTRATION
& LICENSING
& QVP TEAMS i
-S&L
- HJK
-GE
-QVP ZIMMER EXECUTIVE REPORTING TO CEO OF CG&E WITH COMMUNICATION LINE TO THE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE "g
IONRIN
- EXPERIENCED EXTERNAL
~9~
ORGANIZATION.
g
INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ZIMMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT KEY RECOMMENDATIONS ON TOP MANAGEMENT o
CG&E BOARD OF DIRECTORS Retain Full Responsibility Become More Involved and Knowledgeable i
Elect Director Experienced in the Nuclear Industry Evaluate Officers with Zimmer Responsibility Appoint a Zi. amer Project Oversight Committee i
o ZIMMER PROJECT OVERSIGHT COMMI'ITEE An Advisory Committee of the Board Withcut Line Management Responsibility l
Suppleasented by a Staff of Advisors 0
Provide an Overview and Source of Information and Analysis of Zi== mar Operations l
o CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Retain CEO Responsibility for CG&E Including Zi==nar Involved in Policy Decisions and Their Results gY Clear Demons *,ation of the Importance of Quality and Quality Assurance
] -
[
=
~
INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ZIMMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT KEY RECOMMENDATIONS ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT o
SENIOR EXECUTIVE Responsible for Only Zi===r Activities Responsible for Alt Zi===r Activities Proven Track Record of Management of Major Nuclear Projects o
CONSTRUCTION Hire an Experienced, External Architect-Engineer-Construction Company Manage Construction and Quality Verification Program Preserve Architect-Engineer-Constructor
(
Corporate Identity o
QUALITY ASSURANCE Organizational Status the K=== as Other Functions Reporting to the Zir===r Senior Executive Increased Staff of Experienced, Pemnant Employees 11AUEY MNFS 1TaiN0tDGY.- am
=m O
9
INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ZIMMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT KEY PROGRAMMATIC RECOMMENDATIONS o
QUALITY VERIFICATION PROGRAM Broader than Existing Quality' Confirmation Program Complete, on a Segment-by-Segment Basis, Prior to Hardware Chat.ges Multi-discipline Teams Imad by the Architect-Engineer-Constructor o
TOP LEVEL DEMONSTRATION OF COMMITMENT TO QUALITY AND QUALITY ASSURANCE o
THIRD PARTY REVIEWS Design Review Audit of the Implementation of the QVP Records Management Review TORREY I1NFS 11iOINotDGY ea M m q
J 6
i
--