ML20101J144
| ML20101J144 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire, Mcguire  |
| Issue date: | 10/26/1984 |
| From: | Tucker H DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20101J116 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8412280431 | |
| Download: ML20101J144 (2) | |
Text
b DUKE Pghlt3Od$U>396t :I P.O. Box 33180
' C P Glf, CHAnLorrTE, N.C. 28242 IIAL H. TUCKER retzenown
$fl p f
23 (704) 073-4531
= = eme= roe =,
October 984 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 11 101 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323
Subject:
McGuire Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370
Reference:
RII:WTO NRC/01E Inspection Report 50-369/84-23 and 50-370/84-20
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
Pursuant to 10CFR 2.201, please find attached a response to Violation 50-369/84-23-01 which was identified in the above referenced inspection report.
Note that our response to Report 50-369/84-21 and 50-370/84-18's Notice of Violation will also address the additional example concerning the use of an inadequate procedure for reactor trip breaker response time testing identified in this report, as requested.
Duke Power Company does not consider any information contained in this report to be proprietary.
Very truly yours,
/$ e' cc c
s
/Hal B. Tucker PBN/mjf Attachment cc:
Mr. W. T. Orders Senior Resident Inspector-NRC McGuire Nuclear Station 9412280431 841130 PDR ADOCK 05000369 G
c' D
~
e c
.:F..+
- O'
_Dukh Power Compzny-McGuire Nuclear-Station
-Response'toNRC/b1EInspectionReport!50-369/84-23.and50-370/84-20 Violation 50-369/84-23-01, Severity Level'V:
-Technic'al Specification 3.3.3.10 requires that the loose part detection system
- be operable in Modes 1 and 2. _Further, if one or more channels are inoperable for more than thirty days, a report outlining the cause of the malfunction and plans for restoring the channel (s) is to be-prepared and submitted within the next ten days.
Contrary to the above, on July 27, 1984, the inspector has noted that the licensee failed to prepare and submit a special report within the required time frame when one of the four channels of-the Unit-1 loose part detection system was declared
-inoperable on June 12, 1984 and remained in that state until the finding was made.
' Response:
1.
Admission or denial'of the alleged violations:
Duke Power Company agrees that the violation occurred as stated.
2.
Reasons for the violations if admitted:
Proper attention was not paid to applicable log books.
3.
Corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved:
The need to pay proper attention to the applicable log books has been emphasized to the appr riate individual. The special-report was subsequently submitted by my letter dated July 30, 1984.
4.
Corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations:
Increased emphasis has been placed on log book review.
5.
Date when full compliance will be achieved:
The station is presently in full compliance with Technical Specification requirements in this area.
.