ML20101B752
| ML20101B752 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 11/05/1975 |
| From: | Ross D JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Brunner E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20101B726 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-95-258 NUDOCS 9603150032 | |
| Download: ML20101B752 (3) | |
Text
..
[p" /. '
~
GN-75-038 l
- . ua
.. w, 7,1!mo p,ugj7g 1
,Cwis la cn-9 10munon.
,O Jersey Central F er & Light Company MADISON AVENUE AT PUNCH BOWL ROAD
- MORRISTOWN. N.J. 07960
- 201539-6111 eum,as a, rua y,-Z, Public Utilities Corporation cenerai SF,Frm November 5, 1975 Mr. Eldon J. Brunner, Chief Reactor Operations Branch Office of Inspection and Enforcement, Region i United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406
Dear Mr. Brunner:
Subject:
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Docket No. 50-219 Inspection No. 75-21 In your letter to us of October 1,1975 regarding an inspection conducted by Mr. E. Greenman on August 26-2.9. 1975, you identified several activities which had not been conducted in accordance with various condi-tions contained in our license. Several infractions werc associated with discrepancies in our implementation of the Oyster Creek Security Program, and in accordance with Section 2.790(d) of the NRC's " Rules of Practice",
Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, we request that this infor-mation pertaining to the physical security plan be withheld from public 4
disclosure.
To facilitate your review, our response to the various infractions is precceded by your findings.
Notice of Violation, Appendix A, Item A:
Contrary to 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, " Instructions, j
Procedures and Drawings," the Oyster Creek Operational Quality Assurance Plan,Section V, and Technical Specifications, Section 6, two examples of failure to follow procedures were identified.
Response
The need to comply with various requirements contained in safety-j related procedures associated with operation, maintenance, and testing has j
most recently been reviewed again with all station personnel _during several l
Quality Assurance-related indoctrination sessions.
Procedural requirements j
will continue to be an area stressed by the staff during the conduct of various activities at the site and will be included in retraining / safety,
sessions conducted at periodic intervals with all station personnpl.
)
I
.nSMITTED HEREWITH
? 15 r RATil
^
^'
9603150032 960228 l
i
h Pa e I l
l l
Notice of Violation, Appendix A, Item B:
Contrary to 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion II, " Quality Assurance l
Programs, the implementing provisions of the Oyster Creek Operational Quality l
Assurance Plan,Section II, (Reference JCP6L letter to Division of Reactor Licensing dated May 2,1974) and ANSI N45.2.3 - 1973 Section 3.2.1 " Cleanness" during an inplant inspection of areas and components, items of trash, litter, and excess materials were observed in the Cable Spreading Room and Battery Room at the Station, and such materials had not been removed.
Response
As noted in your inspection report, paragraph 10, housekeeping re-quirements were satisfactorily met prior to the completion of your in3pection.
The need to maintain cleanliness, particularly in areas where safety-related electrical switchgear and/or cabling exists, has been reemphasized and will receive our continuing attention.
Notice of Violation, Appendix B, Item A:
Contrary to the Oyster Creek Industrial Security Plan dated January 7,1974, Section 3.4.2, the outside Northeast airlock door to the reactor building was found ajar on August 26, 1975. We note that this item was promptly corrected prior to the conclusion of this inspection.
(Recurrent i tem).
Response
The Northeast airlock door to the reactor building was ajar due to a faulty door closure which subsequently was repaired. Employees have been instructed to report immediately any malfunction of any exterior or interior door at the plant and prompt efforts will be expended to correct any discrepant conditions.
Notice of Violation, Appendix B, Item B:
Contrary to the Oyster Creek Industrial Security Plan dated January 7,1974, Section 4.2, which establishes procedural requirements and Procedure No. 1.0 " Security Guidelines" dated April 11, 1974, a licensee representative accompanied by an NRC inspector on August 28, 1975 did not sign in and out on the Vital Area Log maintained in the Cable Spreading Room, a designated Vital "A" area and as required by Section 3.2 of the referenced procedure.
e j
IE:I:99 Cy ef of 3
=
Mr. Eldan J. Brunner Page III j
{\\f
Response
A memorandum to all personnel dated August 29, 1975 1s-been posted dictating requirements that personnel must sign in and out on the '.' Access Log" located in each normally unoccupied Vital "A" Area. All supervisors are to insure that this aspect of the security program is followed.
Verr. truly yours,
& </
Donald A. Ross, Manager Generating Stations-Nuclear pk l
J04EL2'/50INFQPMkT 0?]
18,1,,,
cx or m l