ML20101B289

Performance Indicators,Apr 1992

ML20101B289
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	04/30/1992
From:	OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:
Shared Package
ML20101B287	List: ML20101B285 ML20101B289
References
NUDOCS 9206010216
Download: ML20101B289 (63)

Text

-

-.... - - -. -... - -.. -. - - -.... - -.. - - -. - ~ - - -

~ ~ - - ~ ~ - ~ - - - - - - -

.;;t -

._ i ;$'

.t

$. ? _;'.

L'

's

'~

FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS APRIL 1992 m

H <ut.n w Xlf e

NmEiInumsk ~"""W..I 1

tere c

i g

. e. A.m mmm=w _asmmag). $E8188833 e

-a

==m pua

=.

.6 d

~~~~

~.

7

,/

/

Prepared by:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group l

9206010216 920526 ADDCKOSOOg5 DR

kaal sj caa%a w am, al&ds...

d inndnu wudan, wnd wwndjwkwnl...

d w a, ?fdians, canwusny, cananibnenl...

i d w a, way, of 9fs...d w dang, ikjob i

9Ml6lwdhane,way,hant.

Jlw twns-din &L, ut ik wdL of ealavaal pnawa, a w owu an, af weDrwh

w. _ es L6 a wna 4 m g

iki cans lma, kimg, ik 4,V ka of puoin,, uljwd On, dang, C6 9V l%p.

Ja,-).o'e-

_ __=________-_- _

i OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT

.f Prepared By:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group _

APRIL 1992

ABSTRACT PURPOSE The

• Performance Indicators Program"is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant perfor-mance information to OPPD's personnel responsible foi optimizing unit p erformance. The information is presented in a way that provides ready identification of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing and monitonng Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on safety and reliability. Some performance indicators show company goals or industry intormation. This information can be used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation.

SCOPE The conditions, goals, and projections reflected within this report are current as of the end of the month being reported, unless otherwise stated.

in order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following gudelines were iollowed while implementing the program:

1) Data was selected which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.

2) Established corporate goals and industry information were included for comparison.

3) Formal definitions were developed for each performance parameter to ensure consistency in future reports and allow comparison with industry averages where appropriate.

Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report. Please refer comments to the Systen Engineering Department's Test and Performance Group. To increase personnel awareness of Fort Calhoun Station's plant performance, it is suggested that this report be distributed throughout your respective departments.

REFERENCES INPO Good Practices OA-102, " Performance Monitoring - Management Information" INPO Report Dated November 1984," Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" NUMARC 87-00," Guidelines and Technical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Station Black-out at Light Water Reactors", Revision 1 Appendix D,"EDG Reliabi.ity Program", dated April 6,1990.

I

FOREWORD This report was produced in an abbreviated form during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage to allow many performance indicator data sources to devote more time to outage activities. Publication of allindicators will resume in the May 1992 report,

~

Table of Contents / Summary INPO INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS EAg1 luounar

.ono.

- cao -

UPPER in - QQ&L THIS LONTH t AST MONTH IBf,,NQ SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE:

EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM.................. 0.0065..0.024...

.0-

.0.

m l........... 3 COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE (Man. Rem) 118 SNA. 250/YR. 220.9._...175.1..

.. _ n A....... S VOLUME OF LOW. LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE (Cubic Ft.).

.2.118 SNR.. 3.000/YR '...197..

. 0....

.. N A........ 6 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT RATE / DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE.

0.16..

. 0.3..... 0.90..

-.. 0

.. NMA...... 7 -

OPERATIONS EAGE INDUSTRY

,Q E Q, QEQ UPPF R 1N QQ&L THtS MONTH t.AST LONTH IBf,,NQ UNPLANNED SAFE. Y SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -(INPO DEFINITION)..

..,0..

E 0...... 0............. 0.

.. l........ 1 UNPLANNED.%FETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (N RC DEFINITION)........,................. 3..

.0.......,.0....

.0-

.1........2' PLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR................ NA....... 28.3%..A 100%.......100L.......NA...... 4

~

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET....... N A....... NA.

NA --

. N A,........ N A.'...... 8 DOCUMENT REVIEW.....

.................,..NA..

...,.. N A..,... NA..

.. N A.,.... N A..

.9 MAINTENANCE EAQE NDUSTRY

.Q E Q, 5O UPPER 10%. QQ&L Ill1S.MQh'~, AST MOMiH IBENQ

- DIESEL GENERATOR UN AVAILABILITY (Hours)..... NA.... 210.2/DG ;

.0..,.....,

. 0....

..NA...10 AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE -

WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON. OUTAGE),... NA..

....,. N A...-..... N A.'....... s ' A..

.. A...... 11 -

MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE)...-... N A..

N A....... NA.......... NA '....

... A...... 12 d

CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD

- (N ON -O UTAG E)..............................,................ NA..

.... NA... 55.5%..

. 50 4% -

NA... 13 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE........

$ NA..

. 65%. -,. 44.5%..... 77.4%..

... N A..... 14 NUMBER OF OUT OF. SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS....................... NA.,....., <13..,

.. 22..

.9.

..NMA.15 i

MAINTENANM (cont'd))

ISE PDJSTRY

,QPf,Q, QEEQ tiPPE A 1% M TH!S LO*JTH i AST LONTH 18QQ MAINTENANCE OVERTIME.

... N A..

.,10%.. 39.7%..

. 40 4%.

..NA..

16 PROCEDtIRAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTEN ANCE).

....., N A..

.. N A.

2.

.3.

.. l..

.17 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE MAINTENANCE)..

.. NA.

.. <350... 389..

.339.

..NMA...18 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS.

... N A.

.. 0..

.,0..

.0.

.. l..... 19 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS..

..... N A..

.. N A.

.. N A.

.. N A..,,. NA.... 20 CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE..

.... N A..

. 2 00E4.. 6 07E-7.. 6 08E 7.

.. N A.

. 21 CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION fMM INDUSTRY

,QEE2, QEf,Q yPPE A iN QQQ TH!E LO*fiH MQQ IS[,tQ COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSUP5 (Man-Rem)....

.,118.5/YR.. 250!YR.. 220 9..

,..175 1..

,.. N A.,.. 5 VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE (Cubic Ft.)..

. 2,118 5/YR. 3.000/YR..197..

0.

.. N A...... 6 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE (mrem)....

... N A..

.. N A.

.610...... 357..

.. N A...... 22 TOTAL SKIN AND l

(

CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS.

.. N A..

. 144..

.203.........129.

.. N MA.....,23 -

DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA..

... N A..

.. 88%.. 8 5 9%..

. 85 9%...... N A.,,. 24 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM......

.. NA..

,.. NA... 39..

. 59,.....,,. l..... 25 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS..

..-..........NA...

.. NA.

. 64...

. 61..

.. D.,.. 26 GASEOUS RADIOAC'iVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO Tnd ENVIRONMENT (curies)...... N A..

.340.

.3585..

... N A..

.. N A.,. 27 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT (curies)......NA.

.225.

. 176.1.,...-... N A..

... l........ 2 8 SECURITY IMM INDUSTRY QEEQ QEEQ.

M M TH!S LONTH t AST LONTH IffQQ LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)..

..N A.

.. NA.

. 59..

. 57..

.. N A..... 29 SECURITY NON SYSTEM FAILURES..

.. NA..

.. N A..

., NA..

.. NA..

.. N A... 30 li

.. ~.

SECURITY leonro)

M INDUSTRY. QPEQ QPfD UPPE R iM QQL, IH!S MONTH LAST MONTH IBQQ SECURITY SYSTE M FAILURES......................... NA.,,

.. NA.'........ NA...... N A..,... NA..... 31 MATERIALS AND Ob(SIDE SERVICES.

Eg INDUSTRY-QpfQ QggQ UPPiAin QQg, TH!S MONTH 1AST MONTH ISQQ EXPEDITED PURCHASES..............

.. NA.

... o.5%..,..1.79%..

. 3.15%..... NMA.... 32 DESIGN ENGINEERING gg INDUSTRY QEED QEEQ UPPF A 1N QQ&L TH!S MONTH t AST MONTH IBLtQ TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLU DING SCAFFOLDING)............................... NA,

.. o..

..34..

.. 28.

.. N A...... 33 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY gg INDUSTRY CffQ Q22Q UPPER 1L% QQ6L. THIS MONTH LAST MONTH ISQiQ DISABLING IMJURY/lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE....o.16....o.3

....o.90 -

.. o,,... NMA..... 7 RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES -

FREQUENCY RATE,...........,

....... NA -

2.0..,,... 1.81 -....... o.36..

.. D..... 34 HUMAN RESOURCES gg INDUSTRY QEEQ QPfQ UPPFH1% ~ QQ&L THIS MONTH I AST MONTH IBQQ NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS RE PORTED IN LERs................,................... NA -

NA.....

..1.

.,....1.....

.. I...... 35 LER ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN......................... NA,,,....... NA...

..NA

.., NA..

..NA...

36 STAFFING LEVEL.......=

....,. N A...

NA..

..NA....... NA..

..NA....37

' TRAINING AND OUAllFICATION gg tNDUSTRY QEEQ QffD UppF A 1x. nQal TH!S MONTH 1.AST MONTH IBQiQ LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING =

........... N A....... N A....... N A..

. N A.... 38

~

LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS...

........ N A -

NA....

..NA..

.. N A...... 39 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS.

- NA N A.,

..NA,

.. N A....

.. N A.<.... 40 lii L

i i

r.

y en m.4.,

,o a

n,.-

y

....e w...v-,.,e 9,-,e--

+

e

REFUELING OUTAGE

ggif, tNoustny Off.D QEED omn in gag ims uynu tart ummi laum EMERGENT MWOs APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN THE CYCLE 14 REFUELING OU TAGE....................

..............NA..

. 59%..

..NA.

.. NA.,

.. N A..... 41 OUAllTY ASSURANCE

ggir, enuttn!

CEED QCCD umn sx nog ims mmf LAtt Wm1 Ig!Q VIOLATIONS PER 1.000 INSPECTION HOURS........NA.

. 1.6..

..1.85..

. 1.51.

..NMA... 42 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs g

(TWELVE MONTH RUNNING TOTAL)...................NA..... N L

..4'2.....

. 04...

.. N A..... 43 CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIF. CARS vs.

NRC VIOLATICNS ISSUED vs.

LE R s R E P OR T E D........................................ N A...

.. N A..

..NA.

,,NA

...NA

....44 PE RFORMAN C E IN DIC ATOR DE FINITION S................................................................................ 4 5 S AFETY EN H AN C EMENT PROGRAM INDEX...........................................................

4..............-.49 REPORT D!sTRIBUTION LIST...

................................................................................51

SUMMARY

SECTION PO S ITIV E T R E N D R E PO RT........................................................................................................... 5 2 ADVERS E TREN D RE PORT......................................

......................................................52 INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMNY ATTCHWN REPORT..............

.................52 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMEW75 CdANGES.,........................................... 52

)

!aBLE OF CQ ' TENTS SUMM ARY TREND SYMBOLS A = ADVERSE TREND 1 -IMPROVED PERFORMANCE D - DECLINING PERFORMANCF NMA. NEEDS MANAGEMENT ATTEh' ON NA = NOT APPLICABLE /AVAILABLE 1

IV

_-__--_a

3-O Safety System Actuations

-O-1992 Fort Calhoun Goal C

Industry Upper 10 Percentile 2-l l

l i

i 1-0 0

r 'T " T "*1 0 C,O,O O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O, i

l

'89 90 Si Jan'J2 Feb Mur Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS-(INPO DEFINITION)

There were nopnplanned safety system actuations during the month of Apr:11992.

The 1992 goal for the number of unplanned safety system actliations is zero.

The industry upper ten percentlie value for the number of unplanned safety system actuations pv year is zero. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants for this Indicator.

Data Source: Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Jaworski/Foley/Ronning Advarse Trond: None 1

1

.~_.._. _ ____.._ _ __._...._ _ _ _ _ _

12 Month Running Total SSA 10-

--O-Critical Hours 900 O

Safety System Actuations (SSA) e-800 g

700

'j:

E 6-600 $

s 3

/,

W e

4 500 $

A E

f

• 4-400 g

.$i d

300 v

h 2

M 7,.

200 2-f

'f l

100 r

0 I

"c$

0 3

O<> o 0

'89'90'91 MJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMA 1990 1991 1992 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS-(NRC DEFIMITION)

This indicator shows the number of unplanned safety system actuations (SSAs) which include the High and Low Pressure Safety injection Systems, the Safety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classification of SSAs includes actuations when major equipment is operated and when the logic systems for these safety systems are challeviged.

The last event of this type occurred in June 1991 when there were two anticipatory signal starts for DG 2. The first start occurred after a control relay was bumped causing a momentary loss of power to safety bus 1 A4. DG 2 started a second time when a breaker trip occurred during DG 1 breaker synchronization. DG 2 was not required to provide power to the safety bus in either of these situations.'

The majority of SSAs displayed above were related to 1990 Refueling Outage activities.

These were reviewed under the Safety System Actuation Reduction Program. The goal of :he Prugram (now complete) was to reduce the number of SSAs at Fort Calhoun.-

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for unplanned safety system actuations (NRC definition)is a maximum of 3.

Data Source; Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Repo'rts (LERs)-

Accountability: Jaworski/Foley/Ronning :

Adverse Tren'i None 2

_,4.- _.. _._,-

c-,-_

_ _ -. ~ - -,,

..-.m

.. ~.

1992 Monthly Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value

-it-1992 Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value Year to Date IGOOD_j

-O-199181992 Fort Calhoun Goals (0.024)

-+- 1991 Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value Year to Date 0.06-

-A-1995 INPO Industry Goal (0.025)

-O-Industry Upper 101. (.0065) 0.05 -

x 4

0.04 -

f' O.03-D

~D 6

6 8

D D

D D-d D

0.02-0.01 -

D O

O O

-O O

O O

D---C O

O 0

,=,=,=,x, May91 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr92 EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE P

This indicator shows the Emergency AC Power System unavailability value, as defined by INPO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the reporting month.

The Emergency AC Pc ver System unavailability value for April 1992 is zero. The.

Emergency AC Power System unavailability value year-to-date is zero.

The 1992 and 1991 Fort Calhoun year end goals for this indicator are 0.024. The 1995 INPO industry goal is 0.025. The industry upper ten percentile value is approximately 0.0065.

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning Accoui,: ability: Jaworski/Ronning

Adverse Trend: None 3-

O 1992 Monthly Planned Capability Loss Factor 1

~

~

-M-1992 Year to Date Average PCLF 90%-

.-+- 1991 Year to Date Average PCLF 80%-

-O-1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun GL a s l

-D-Industry Medi n Value (18.3% for a lnree Year Average) j 70%-

?

lGOODI

- j j 60% -

t

/

L T" 50% -

40%-

30% -

/

g

.g 20% -

0 0

0 C

O O

O O

O O

i1 10% -

C O

O O

O O

O--

,b

'=

0%

^ -,

=},^

May91 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr92 PLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Planned Capability Loss Factor (FCLF), the PCLF year to-date average, and the Fort Calhoun yearly average PCLF goals for 1991 and 1992. Planned Capability Loss Factor is defined as the ratio of the planned energy losses during a given period of time, to the reference energy generation (the energy that could be produced if the unit were operated continuously at full power under reference ambient conditions), expressed as a percentage.

The PCLF was reported as 100% for the month of April 1992 due to the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. The year to-date average PCLF for 1992 is 75%.

The 1992 Fort Calnoun yearly average Planned Capability Loss Factor goalls 28.3%.

The 1991 goal was 7%.

The PCLF industry median value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91)is 18.3%.

Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountabliity: Patterson Adverse Trend: None l

l l -

Personnel cumulative Radiation Exposure (Man Rom)

-O - Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (250 Man Rem)

-e - 1995 INPO Industry Goal (185 Man Rem)

- < > - - cycle 14 Refueling Outago Goal (210 Man Rom)

-O-Industry Upper 10% (110.s Man-Rem for a Three Year Average)

[GD001 300 -

276 C

O-C C

C C

C C

C O

C O

~

A a

~4 A

A A -- - 4 a

b-- -A 93.4 0 -~0" ~ ~"~ O ~ 0~~' 0 ~~ 0 ~~~ D~ D ~O ~ 0 ~ ~ ~Q

/

100 -

/8 52

/

o i

i

'89

'90

'91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug bep Oct Nov Dec92 COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE During April 1992,45.781 man rem was recorded by TLDs worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. The year to-date exposure is 220.874 man rem.

The Fort Calhoun goal for personnel radiation exposure (cumulative) during 1902 is 250 man rem.

Cumulative radiation exposure for the Cycle 14 Refueling Octage was 216.899 man-rom, which exceeds the outage goal of 210 rnon rem. The goal was not achieved be-cause the outage duration was longer than anticipated and there was more exposure than expected due to the stuck reactor vessel stud and the thermal shield inspection..

The 1995 INPO industry goalis 185 man rem per year. The industry upper ten percen-tile value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91) is epproximately 118.5 -

man rem per year.

Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) l AccountabilityiPatterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 l

l S

,. ~.. _...

. _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. ~ _ _ _ _. _.. _ _

l 2s000 -

Curnulative Dry Active Waste Sent For Processing (in cubic feet) 20000-15000-t 0000 -

5000-o Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 G

Radioactive Waste Buried This Month (in cubic feet) l Cumulative Radioactive Waste Buried

-O-Fort Calhoun Goat For Waste Buried (3,000 cubic feet) 1995 INPO Industry Goal (3,884 cubic feet)

-0.

Industry Upper 10% (2,118.s cubic feet) 431o 4s00 -

a a

a a

a a

a a

a a

a a

3000 -

O O

O-0 0

0 0

0 O

O O

O 1334 1500-0 i

i

'90

'91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug sep l Oct Nov Dec92 Year-end Total VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The upper amph shows the cumulative volume of dry radioactive waste sent for pro-cessing. The lower graph shows the volume of radwaste buried this month, the cumula-tive radwaste buried this year, and the year-end totals for radioactive wade buried the previous 2 years.

The monthly and cumulative volumes of radioactive waste which were buried during the-month cif April 1992 have been revised. These revisions are due to the delay involved in the shipping for processing, the processing, and the burying of radioactive waste.

Cumulathe amount of solid radwaste shipped off site for processing (cubic feet)<

15,360.0 i

Amount of solid radwaste shipped off site for processing during April (cubic feet) 7,680.0 l

Volume of solid radioactive waste which was buried during Apill(Cubic feet) 195.3-Cumulative volume of solid radioactive waste buried in 1992 (cubic feet)

_197.0 l

Amount of solid radioactive waste (de watered resin) in tempt ary storage (cubic feet) 120.3 The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for the volume of solid radioactive waste which has been l

buried is 3,000 cubic feet, The 1995 INPO Industry goalls 110 cubic meters (3,884 cubic feet) per year. The industry upper ten percentile value is approximately 60 cubic meters (2,118.5 cubic feet) per year.

Data Source: Patterson/Breuer (Manager / Source)

Accountabilityi Patterson/Bilau Adverse Trend:- None SEP54 6

.m.

2

. 2..

~ _. _ -. -. - -

... ~. -. - -. - - - - -. -. - -. -. -. - - - - -.

k 1992 Disabhng injury /lliness Frequency Rate 1.6 -,

-H-1991 Disabling injury /lliness Frequency Rate IGOODI 1.4. -

k

+ Fort Calhoun Goal (0.3) 1.2 -

--a--

1995 INPO Industry Goal (0.5) 1-0.8 -

06-A 4

0 A

4 4

A A

A

• ^

O.4 -

O O

O~

-O--O--O-~

~~O--O

~O-O O

0.2 -

0=

t' Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug

.Sep Oct Nov De.92 DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE) i This indicator shows the 1992 monthly disabling injury / illness frequency rate and the 1991 disabling injury / illness frequency rate.

The disabling injury / illness frequency rate for April was 0.90. There were two lost time accidents, a back injury and a knee injury, reported at the Fort Calhoun Station in April 1992. The total number of lost time accidents that have been reported during 1992 is two. The 1992 disabling injury / illness frequency rate goal was set at 0.30. The 1995 INPO Industry goalis 0.50.

The disabling injury / illness rate for the past twelve months is 0.68.

The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury / illness frequency rate is approximately 0.16.

y1at y_ ear End Rate 1989 0.4 1990 0.5 1991 0.4 Data Sourcei Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

' Accountability: Patterson/ Richard Adverse Trend: None SEP 25 & 26 7

,a.

Operations 1992 Budget ($ Million) 80,

L

--M - 1992 Cumulative Total ($ Million) 60-40-20-

/

Y 0

Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 40-Maintenance 1992 Budget ($ Million) 30-

.-M-1992 Cumulative Total ($ Million)

~~

go, Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92-OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year to-date as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun -

Station.

The budget year to date for Operations was 26,957,900 dollars for April 1992 while the actual cumulative expenditures through April totaled 23,690,262 dollars. T he 1992 year-end budget for operations has been revised to 66,560,800 dollars, which is a reduction of 100,000 dollars.

The budget year-to-date for_ Maintenance was 11,883,600 dollars for April _1992 while

- the actual cumulative expenditures through April totaled 11,320,526 dollars.

4 Data Source: Gleason/ Parent (Manager / Source).

Accountability: Scofield Adverse Trend: None 8

s 4

m-

-..~ ~

m

-. ~ - - -. - -...

.-.-w

-.v.w.m.-e.w..v, e,

-..,.,.I+.

e....~ -..

,..a,-

...,v-.

,~-.r~,4,

l 1

1 O Documents Scheduled for Review l

s00-l 8 Documents Reviewed l

O Overdue Documents 1

400-1 300-

{

200-7 i

l t

j 100-p y

f 9

s

-,r f

f]

]/,

"R

-b f

5 y

9 r+-

9 9

.g

.o 1

n_

q_

h x

S,.

1 z

1 i

z

+

4 et i

i i

i i

i i

i i

i i

i t

May91 Jua Jul Aug SG Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr92 DOCUMENT REVIEW This indicater shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the schedu:ed due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month. These document reviews are performed in house and L.clu' e Special Procedures, the Site J

l Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventiva Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual.

During April 1992 there were 61 document reviews completed while 76 document re-views were scheduled. At the end of April, there were 17 document reviews overdue.

I During the month of April there were 28 now or renamed documents reviewed. These new or renamed documents v>ill need to be reviewed again in 1994.

Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Patterson/Jaworski Adverse Trond: None SEP 46 9

O Planned Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavailability Q Unplanned Hours of Diesef Generator No. 2 Unavailabikty Q Estimated Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavailabihty E Planned Hours of Diesel Generator No.1 Unavailabihty C Unplanned Hours of Diesel Generator No.1 Unevallavikty 200 -

150-

?

100-D 50-0 -.

,M i

May91 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr92 200-

--$ -- Cumulative Hours of DG-1 Unavailability from 9/1/91 to 12/31/91

--+-- Cumulative Hours of DG 2 Unavai!abihty from 9/1/91 to 12/31/91 150 -

- * * ~ CumulatNe Hours of DG 1 Unavailabihty f or 1992 t'

+ CumulatNo Hours of DG-2 Unavailabihty for 1992 100-Fort Calhoun Goal for 9/1/91 to 12/31/91 g

So -

a O-O O

O O

Dec91 Jan Fet Mar Apr92 DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY This indicator provides a monthly illustration of diesel generator unavailability. The top graph shows the diesel generator planned, unplanned, and estimated unavailable hours for DG-1 and DG 2 for each of the last twelve months. The lower graph shows the cumulative hours of unavailability for each diesel generator for two time periods: from October through December 1991 and for January through April 1992.

There were no (zero) unavailable hours for DG 1 and DG 2 during the month of April 1992. The 1992 Fort Calhoun yearly goalis a maximum of 210.24 ur available hours per diesel generator.

Fort Calhoun met the goal of 43.8 unavailable hcurs per DG for the last four months of 1991. TNs goalis based on the 1990 INPO industry median value for diesel generator unavailable hours.

The 14.4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of DG 1 unavailability and 18.3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> of DG-2 unavailability for the last four months of 1991 were attributable to planned maintenance activities.

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Ronning Adverse Trond: None to 1

400-8 January 1992 Outstanding MWOs O February 1992 Outstanding MWOs O ' March 1992 Outs.eiiding MWOs i

300-O April 1992 Outstanding MWOs

' Programmatic change to retect change in non outage criteria.

200-

~"

l 100-. l y

~

0;

,E 0 3 Months 3 6 Months 6-9 Months 912 Months

>12 Months AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECT'VE NON OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the age

.:orrective non outage maintenance work orders (MWOs) remaining open at the end of the reporting month.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: An adverse trend is indicated based on three consecutive months of increasing values for corrective non-outage MWOs 3 - 6 months old and MWOs >12 months old. This trend is due to the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage during February, March and April.-

i 11 7

0 January 1992 4

O February 1992 400 -

O ' March 1992 350 -

'g

N/ ',I' O April 1992 300 -

g p

m,,,,

,[,.

a m e an p M g h e Q M

""~~

250 -

~

1%

- ) k'f, 5

200 -

/,

,,p,

,9; 150 -

V 3

'f:

f.'!

h' 100 -

~ 'p;

/;

jp

• 7 h'I

'/,

a.

+

n

/

[ IS:

Y,'

50-M

/,;

${ :/

G(

ri;\\

y

7; l/,

w v

y

\\

n t

i 4

i i

Total Open MWOs Open MWOs>3 Yotal Open Safety.

Open Safety Open High Priority mon'.hs old Related MWOs Related MWOs > 3 MWOs Months Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDEn BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of corrective non outage MWOs remaining open at the end of the reporting month, along with a breakdown by several key categories.

The number of open MWOs >3 months old is increasing because on line activities must be scheduled beyond the end of the Cycle 14 Refueling Outaen.

l Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba

^

Adverse Trend: An adverse trend is indicated based on three consecutive months of increasing values for corrective non-outage Open MWOs >3 months old and Open Safety Related MWOs >3 months old. This trend is due to the Cycle 14 Refueling Outa0e during February, March and April.

SEP 36.

i 12 I

.n..

lGOODI 80%-

[] Corrective Maintcr.ance Backltg > 3 Months Old Y

60% -

7 i

7 bf-40%-

If

_w

.a L.,

(.

h

[

e

=

. t.

M m

l

$w C

6

}$1k 20%- th7 k

m e

v 7

a m

a a

t-

.b)$

M W

d

)

n W

oplf y

t f

9 Q

f 0%

May91 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb

' Mar Apr92

' Programmatic change to reflect change in nun outage criteria.

COHRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the percentage of open corrnetive non-outage maintenance work orders that vvere greater than three months old at th9 end of the reporting month.

The percentage of open corrective non outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of April 1992 was reported as 55.5%.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba l

l Adverse Trend: None l

13 wor m

e

%gd a+eev'-

e e s-9y e-ry--

.<r 9

yrm

+

T--+rp-1=

y

_._.._.___-._._._._.__.__m___.m a

O Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance eH GOOD Refueling 90%-

-O-1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Non Outage Goals Outage 80%-

US

}

70%-

h 60 d

~

@}:.

iy !

60%-

C O

.O.

O O

O O

2 M'

i2 wt m

m$

i$

{n U

/r 9A h"

W 4; <

~~

50%-

2:

a m

~

i n.

s ij[i 4.[f M

.N:.

0k fi$

(f bl$

1 p.m.

1IO M.

L ib 40%-

if W

p:%

{m&

sQ t

e

' ' ^

M@F s

9 5

W n

4)j k

• yk

@?

9 El m

1 2

g M

e l3 g;

d lie d

W g

g 30%-

g yld

$;4 w

it:F

.a

$g.

g Gy g

g

y%

r) e K

lM n

l qQ.

%p M

M e

m

-w g.

A

s n

m n

A cr e

s

.g um 7,

May91 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov -

Dec Jan Feb Mar - Apr92 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL M AINTENANCE This indicator shows the ratio of completed preventive maintenance to total cornpleted maintenance.

The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 44.5% in April 1992 during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

l The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to attain a ratio of non outage preventive to total mainte-nance greater than 65%. The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal was to attain a ratio of non-outage preventive to total maintenance greater than 60%.

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Data Source: PattersorvSchmitz (Manager / Source)

Adyerse Trend: None SEP 41 l

l l

l 14

+-

t--

y w

.a yo we,->--

,ww,,-,

,p-e,<--c,v.,

,,w,.e,wv.

w.w%-,

,,,,3,vw,

,,-,e,

,,w,-,,,cym,

+,m

-w,,c-.

,e.-w, y

_. _ _ _ _ _ _ _. - _. =

1 Control Room instruments Repairable On Line O

Total Number of Control Room Instruments Out-of Service 50-

--O-1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals For Total Out-of Service Instruments 40-30-20-m m

O-1 Q

3 l;-liil+3l l Ii !

g L l I

I I

i i

l' I

i l

Mo l Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr92 u

NUMBER OF OUT-OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS r

This indicator shows the total number of out of service control room instruments, the number of instruments repairablo during plant operations (on line), and the 1991 and 1992 Fort Calhoun goals.

There was a total of 22 out of serv ce control room Instruments at the end of April 1992.

S of these instruments toquire a plant outago to repair.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 13 out of service control room instru-ments. The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal was to have less than 14 out of service control room instruments.

Data Source: Patterson/Spilker (Mansger/ Source)

= Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None i

15

___._m_._.

80%-

I GOODI

--X-12 Month Average Maintenance Overtime k

70%-

- O - 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun 'On !Jne" Goals 60%--

Cycle 14 Refueling 50% -

Outage 4

40%-

~

y 30%-

1 C

C C

C C

C, C

?

20%.

_.s

,o p*

OY. -

x g

X l

p on 2

y May91 Jun Jul Aug Sep, Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr92 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the decired mainte-nance activities with the allotted resources, Excess!ve overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue.

The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 39.7% for the month of April 1992 during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. The 12 month average percentage of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 15.8%.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for the "on-line" percentage of maintenance overtime hours with respect to normal hours worked is 101 Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None 16

- -, - ~--.

e-e-

r

,pcw

~n-

,m w

,<w~-s aw v n-w o w-m v,--e,vw-r--

,y

, m m,., w e,--wy,-t

,p, n iv,

v~,,,eaw-r-ge>e--re4ms s,r v.

-'~ v

_ _. _ _,, _ -.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _. - - _ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _ _. _.. _ ~. _ _ _ _ _ _. _. _. _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _.. _ _.. _ _. _

O Open irs helated to the use of Procedures (Maintenance)

O ciosed ins neiated to tne use of Proceoures (Maintenance) l I

Q Procedural Noncornpliance irs (Maintenar.cs)

Cycle 14 Refueling 10-Outage 8

5-k 4

4 3

3 2

2 p

2 l' 2

a

~

1 1

1 1

1 11 I

( :-

0 0 0

0 0 30 k

N 0 :I 000 000 0 0 000 0 O "

0-

-- 3 i

May91 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb_

Mar Ap 92 1

PROCEDUR AL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE) l This indicator shows the number of open Maintenanc_e incident Reports (irs) that are related to the use of procedures, the number of closed irs that are related to the use of procedures, and the number of open and closed irs that received procedural noncom-pliance cause codes.

There were two procedural noncompilance incidents for maintenance reported for the month of April 1992. The incidents were: 1)lR 920298 a step was not signed off/

should have been NA'd in a procedure to open the waterbox manways; and 2) IR 920344 a sign off for a step in procedure MM RR CEDM 1201 was inadvertently missed.

l l

Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source) -

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba

- Adverse Trend: None SEP 15,41 & 44 17

800-

[,]

Open MWOs

+ 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals Cycle 14 600-Refueling Outage C

O O

O O

O O

400-3 314 310 322 318 0

302 b

fyf,}f 250 i

Y

,?!

'7'N N01

'N N,

A 0

-- 5 i

i i

i i

i i

i e

i i

MayG1 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr02 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the number of corrective non outage Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) that were open at the end of the reporting month.

The number of corrective non outage MWOs for April 1992 is high due to the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage during the months of February, March and April.

The 1992 goal for this indicator is to have less than 350 corrective non outage mainte-nance work orders remaining open. The 1991 goal for this indicator was to have less than 450 corrective non outage maintenance work orders remaining open.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 l

18

_ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ ~ _ _ _. - _ _ _. _ _... _. _

3-O Nurther of Missed STs Resuhing in LERs 2-l l

1-l l:

l 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 i

i i

i e

i i

i e

i i

e i

i i

j

'90 91 May91 Jun - Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr92 l

i i

NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT l

REPORTS l

r This indicator shows the number of missed Surveillance Tests (STs) that result in Lic-ensee Event Reports (LERs) during the reporting month. The graph on the left shows the yearly totals for this indicator for the previous two years.-

During the month of April 1992, there were no missed STs that resulted la LERs.

The 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun goals for this indicator are zero.

Data Source: Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Patterson/Jaworski l.

Adverse Trend: None -

SEP 60 & 61 l

19

Components With More Than One Failure IGOODI 20-

-M--

Components With More Than Two Failures 15-10-i l

5-r,

_,s s

,s n

,s May91 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr92 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS The Maintenance Effectiveness Indicator was developed following guidelines set forth by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Opera-tional Data (NRC/AEOD). The NRC/AEOD is currently developing and verifying a main-tenance effectiveness indicator using the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) component failures.

This indicator has been revised to show the number of NPRDS components with more than one failure during the last eighteen months and the number of NPRDS compo.

nonts with more than two failures during the last eighteen months. The number of NPRDS components with more than two failures in an eighteen month period should indicate the effectiveness of plant maintenance. (This chai.ge applies only to the September 1991 through April 1992 data. The data for May through August 1991 is based on a twelve month interval,)

During the last 18 reporting months there were 16 NPRDS components with more than 1 failure. 4 of the 16 had more than two failures. The tag numbers of the components with more than two failures are B/PO-905, CH-1 A, CH 1B, and RCA Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None 20

20-

- Calculated Check Valve Failure Rate por Million Crimponent Hours Industry Check Valve Failure Ra,e per Million Component Hours 15-

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal lGOODl V

10 eg 10-1 J

5-Wn 1

1 C

O n

n n

v v

v v

v v

a l 0-i i

'89 '90 '91 May91 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec-Jan Feb Mar Apr92 CheckValve Failures CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE This indicator shows the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate, the Fort Calhoun goal and the industry check valve failure rate. This rate is based upon failures during the l

previous 18 months. The check valve failures at Fort Calhoun Station for each of the previous three years are shown on the left.

The data for the industry check valve failure rate is three months behind the repelng month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the data.

For January 1992, the Fort Calhoun Station reported an actual check valve faliure rate of 6.07 E 7, while the industry reported an actual failure rate of 2.89 E-6. At the end of April 1992, the Fort Calhoun Station reported a calculated check valve failure rate of l

6.07 E 7.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a failure rate of 2.00 E 6.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

- Accounte.bility: Jaworski/Ro!!!ns.

M '9rse Trend: None SEP 43 l

21

- - -.~.-- -

O Highest Exposure for the Month (mRern)

O Highest Exposure for the Quarter (mrem)

E Highcst Exposure for the Year (mrem) cno0 -

4 OPPD 4500 mrem /yr. Umit 4000-3000-l 2000-1670 1000-l 610 610

......aaa.sg April 4

MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE During April 1992, an individual accumulated 610 mrem which was the highest indi-vidual exposure for the month.

The maximum individual exposure for the second quarter of 1992 was 610 mrem.

The maximum individual exposure reported for the year 1992 was 1,670 mrem. This dose was a result of severaljobs a machinist was extensively involved in during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem /

year.

Date Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None 22

_. - _.,, - _. - _. _. ~ _. - -

300 -

O Monthly Personnel Contaminations

- Cumutative PersonnelContaminations E

--O-Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (144) 200-150-C O

O O

O

-O O

O O

O 100-3 74

.w 50-M M

25 L

U P

t k.

i i

i i

i i

i i

i i

i i

i.

i

'90 11 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS This indicator shows the number of skin and clothing contaminations for the l'eporting

- month. The number of skin and clothing contamina! Ions has increased during the months of February, March and April as a result of the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

l A total of 203 contaminations have occurred during 1992.

There was a total of 55 skin and clothing contaminations in 1991.

l There was a total of 237 skin and clothing contaminations in 1990.

l The 1992 goal for skin and clothing contaminations is 144.

Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovott Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 54 23

. ~..

g D

Dooontaminated Radiation Controlled Area 100% -

GOOD

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal (non-outage months)

Cycle 14 Refueling 90%-

y q

Qutage g!

n$

hi My b

h[

[f N

(

e 80%- g M

g g

@j{

h' Q

.?

r W

T w

7:n y

^m m

-s s

a mm y

m

+

R G

Y?@

y:Y b

3@

{3

.n y

i, n

h.

?j})

g' g

ay pg j

g c

70%-

9,

q

'g Q

i$

t h I k 4*h1 fn .s e x

1. s E

60% - 9 b [ 1 'g i y

c h

y ' 4 50 % May91 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr92 DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA This indicator shows the percentage of the RCA that is decontaminated (clean) based on the total square footage, a 1991 Fort Calhoun goal of 85% decontaminated RCA for non outage months and a 1992 goal of 88% decontaminated RCA for non outage months. At the end of the reporting rnonth,85.9% of the total square footage of the RCA was decontaminated. Date Source: Patterson/Gundal (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 24

Q Number of idefted PRWPs Cycle 14 80-Refueling Outage 60-59 50-l 39 40-30-20-15 m 10-4 4 0-May91 Jun-Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ~Jan Feb Mar Apr92 l RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator shows the number of Poor Radio-logical Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identit.ed during the reporting month. The PRWPs are identified through a review of the monthly Radiological Occurrence Reports and Personnel Contamination Reports. The number of PRWPs which are ideritified each month should indirectly provide a means to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' rad!ological performance.- During the month of April 1992,39 PPWPs were identified. Cf the 39 PRWPs,3 were Radiological Occurrence Reports.TN. umber of PRWPs for the months of February,' - March and Aprilis higher than the rudabers reported for previous months due to the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. 1 L -- Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)- Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None SEP SP. .25 "v E +, n e

O Total Number of Hot Spots O Number of Additional Hot Spots identified O Cumulative Hot Spots Removed O nemovai pianned 75- -O-1992 Fort Calhoun Goal for Hot Spots Removed T y ) ~ so-4 I 25- ~ M . --O-- -O O-O. -O - O.---O - -O ~ pm_ % 2 i i i i i i i i i i i Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Doc 92 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS P This indicator shows the total number of hot spoir - h have been identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been documu.m , trough the use of a hot spot identification sheet. A hot spot is defined as a smalllocalized source of high radiation. A hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item or piece of equipment is at least 5 times the General Area dose rate ano the item or piece of equipment's dose rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem / hour. At the end of April, there were b4 hot spots identified. 33 of these hot spots were con-sidered permanent, i.e., hot spots which are not significant dose contributors or are cost prohibitive for removal.1 hot spot was removed and 4 new hot spots (allin Room 22 on l LPSI lines to a shutdown cooling heat exchanger) were identified during the month. Removalis planned for 19 hot spots.12 hot spots are still under evaluation. l-The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalls to remove one hot spot per month-l l . Date Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) i l Accountabliity: Patterson/Lovett l Adverse Trends: None 26

Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curiet) 800 - - Cumule a Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies) -O-Cumulativo AnnualGoal(Curies) 600 - 465 400-5 c 0 0 0 v 0 0 0 0 W .[- g4 200-0 I~ ,U" r7/A e-i '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dn-91 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT. The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for Janu-ary 1,1991 through December 31,1991. A total of 358.5 curies have been released to the environment during this time, in S6;hemoer,238.236 curies of gaseous radioactive waste was released to the envi-tonment due to containment purges required during the unscheduled maintenance outage. Most of the radioactive waste was released in the form of Xenon 133. 4 The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 is 340 curies for this indica-tor. The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months. Date Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Trausch Adverse Trend: None 27

l B - Monthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged - Cumulative Radioactive Lquid Discharged V -O-Cumulative AnnualGoal 300 - 231 228-C O O--C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x* 200 - ,s m e 175 l }$ c i 0 l 100- ? 28.4 M M# 18.2 22.7 4.8 ~. 8.3 8 4T / 91 5.3 6.3 f, "@d" 0 - " 2.3 qu#"e t_ I i i l i i i 1. 4 I i i i i i I '88 '89 '90 Jan91: Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug. Sept: Oct. Nov Dec91 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liqu!d radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for January 1,1991 through December 31,1991. The liq'uid radioactive waste that was discharged is the environment from all sources totaled 176.1 curies during.this tirae. The Fort : ~ Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 was 225 curies,- 4 The Iqt@' .ioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months Data Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source) i Accountability: Patterson/Lovett ..a Adverse Trend: None 1 28-l v+. -.. .c y q p p

O Non System Failures l GOOD l 30-y 25-20-17 15-El M 10-8 4 7 7@mM 7 5-Tm e l I I l l 1 4 i i i i Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 [ GOOD 1 @ System Faitres 80-n y 70- ~~~ 60-56 S2 50-l ~~ 43 40-y- 30-fI f, 20- . p', 10-O y Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 LOGG ABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)

he Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) Indicator is depicted in two separate graphs The first graph depicts the total number of loggable/ reportable non system failures concerning Security Badges, Access Control and Authorization, Security Force Error, and Unsecured Doors. The bottom graph shows the total number of loggable/

reportable incidents concerning system failures which occurred during the reporting i month. During the month of April 1992, there were 59 loggable/ reportable incidents identified. System failures accounted for 52 (88%) of the loggable/ reportable incidents, and 13 (25%) of these were environmental failures. Of significance during this reporting period was the decrease in lost / unattended security badges and access authorization inci-dents. System failures increased primarily due to numerous door hardware malfunc-tions, compoar ulu.ed problems, and several days of severe weather. Most of these problems were resolved by the end of the reporting period. It should be noted that there were 84 system failures during the same period in 1991. Data Source: Sefick/Woemer (Manager / Source) Accountability: Sofick Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 29

~ =... O January 92 3* O February 92 J!25-Q March 92 5 -E O April'92

• 20-E k

Ea15- -y j . 10- ~ 7 7 f 6 G-5 h' -- 5 $ 5-4 /. 3 '// /, eu /fs fjk 2 '/f 2 2 0 i .x CC Badges Access Control Security Force Error-Unsecured Doors - SECURITY NON-SYSTEM FAILURES This indicator shows the number of loggable/ reportable non-system failures for the reporting month. These items include: Security Badges, Access Control and Authoriza-t%n, Security Force Error, and Unsecured Doors.- Non-Svstem Failures Number of incidents - Aor. '92 Mar. '92 Secunty Badges - L1 ' 5 Access Control and Authorization 0 ' Security Force Error l1 1-Unsecured Doors 5 2 Total. 7: j l Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source): Accountability: Sefick - Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 30 .u

I O Environmental O Failure IGOODI I 4 20-16 15- 'E 12 tyyy hk 10- $!{ 6 5 $N 4df 5-2 M 3 CT g O O O (5 Alarms CCTV Computer Search riquipment Doors O 1991 System Failures Q 1992 System Failures lGOODI + 100 - 82 84 80-73 E 70 67 60-5,,8 E 56 53 43 42 40-20-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES This indicator shows the number of loggable/ reportable system failures for the reporting month. These items include: Alarm System Failures, CCTV tailures, Security Computer Failures, Search Equipment Failures, and Door Hardware Failures. Alarm systems and CCTV failureo will be divided into two categories: environmental failures and failures as defined in the performance indicator definitions. Also, the 1991 and 1992 System Fail-ures will be compared on a monthly basis. l System Number of incidents Acril '92 March *02 Environs Fanures Environs Failures Alarms 12 10 13 5 CCTV 1 2 5 2 Computer N/A 6 N/A 2 Search Equipment N/A 5 N/A 3 Door Hardware E 16 N3 D Totals 13 39 18 25 1 Data Source: Sefick/Woerner(Manager / Source) Accountability: Sefick/Petersen Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 31

O - % of Total Purchases that are Expedited - 4%- Cycle 14 --O-- 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals (0.5%)

Refueling -

. Outage ~~~ 3%- ??k QR 2% - M.a

m..m a

+ {! ~, 1%- e a m 1 b h- - k 'C O O--E O O O---- --O-- s; es s a u 0% 4 i .i i i i i i i - i i i-May91 Jun- - Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec. Jan Feb Mar Apr92-EXPEDITED PURCHASES This indicator shows the percentage of expedited purchases compared to the total number of purchase orders generated during the reporting month. During April, there was a total of 336 purchase orders generated. Of the 336 purchase. orders generated,6 (1.79%) were expedited purchases. Tt6 expedited purchases were for paint for containment, microswitches for FIA-3115, calibration of a spectrum analyzer that was required to complete the outage, contactors _for control room ventilation equip-ment panel Al 38, Limitorque parts for HCV-150 and HCV-151, and SBM switches. The 1992 Fort Cr.lhoun goal for this indicator is 0.5%. The 1991 goal was 0,5%. The number of expedited purchases has been above the Fort Calhoun goal during the months of Februqry, March and April 1992 due to the ordering of items related to the-Cycle ', refueling outage. L Date Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)'. Accountability: Willrett/Fraser Adverse Trend: None 32 -:.............-...-=.-.-.-.-

5 Temporary Modifications >1 cycle old (RFO required for Removal)- O Temporary Mcdifications >6 months old (Ramovable on-line)'- --O _ Fort Calhoun Goal for Temporary Modifications >1 cycle old (0) 6-5- 4-3- 2 2 2 2 bhhhh ghg hh '~ ,fkkIM o !}- MMM o y m .i Febrt:ary '92 March '92 April '92 TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING) This indicator provides information on the number of temporary modification _s greater than one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage (RFO) for removal and the number of temporary modifications removable on line that are greater than six months old.' Also provided is the Fort Calhoun goal for temporary modifications.- There are currently no temporary modifications greater than one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage to rem _ove. In addition,- at the end of April there were 2 temporary modifications installed that were greator than six' months old that can be removed on-line. These were: handjack close of CCW/RW valves, in which OPS is reviewing a system engineering suggestion for closure, and potable water supply piping temporary : repair, which is awaiting completion of MWOs 921203,921204, and 921205 currently scheduled for 6/8/92. H

l At the end of April, there was a total of _18 TMs installed in the Fort Calhoun' Station. 4 of L

the 18 installed TMs require an cutage for removal and_14 are removable on line. In j 1992 a total of 34 temporary moc"fications have been installed. -j Data Source: laworski/ Turner (Manager / Source) Accountability: Jaworski/Gorence l Positive Trend - SEP 62 & 71 33

1992 Recordable injury / illness Frequency Rate - 5-IGOODI X 1991 Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate 4 4.5 - --O-- 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal (2.0) 4-3.5 -- 3-2.5 - 2-O O O O O O O O O O O. 1.5 - 1-0.5 - Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May ' Jun . J ul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY RATE This inoicator shows the 1992 monthly recordable injury / illness cases frequency rate - and the 1991 recordable injury / illness cases frequency rate. A recordable injury / illness case is reported if Nuclear Operations Division personnel are injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid. The record-- able cases frequency rate is computed on a year-to date basis. The recordable injury / illness rate for April was reported to be 1.81. There were three recordable injury / illness cases reported during the month of April-l 1992. There has been a total of four recordable injury / illness cases in 1992. The recordable injury / illness rate for the past twelve months is 3.1. The 1992 goal for this indicator is 2.0. Year Recordable Cases Year-End Ra.it 1989~ 11 2.2 1990' 11 2.1 - 1991 18 3.3 - Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Richard j. Adverse Trend: None SEP 15,25 & 26 34 u

50-Q UcenseeEventReports 46 T Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 40~ Cumulative Ucensee Event Reports +- Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 32 31 i. 29 7 30-L,

. E)l C

as :. I, q l'. 20-12 1 . 9 10 - si l' I. y++ H L' 'e iWris I I I I I i l I i i i i l l l 1 l '88 '89 '90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERS This indicator shows the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) submitted during each month of 1992, the LERs attributed to personnel errors for each month, and the cumulative totals of both for the year. The year-ead totals for the four previous years are also shown. In April, there was one LER reported. This LER was not attributable to personnel error. Data Source: Short/Howman (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 35 l

Inadequate Administrative Controls LERs Inappropriate Actions, Human Error LERs 5-Equipment Failure / Malfunction LERs @ Design Deficiency LERs 4-Acts of Nature, Cause Unknown LERs 3-2- e 2_ '? E 3 9 s 1-2 } 7;l y ~ l ?? ? E ~~ ~ e

x s

E E E E l ( E w x w x ? s N ~ 5 0 1 i i i i i i i i i i May91 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr92 LICENSE EVENT REPORT (LERs) ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the LERs broken down by Root Cause Code for each of the past twelve months from May 1991 through April 1992. Data Source: Short/Howman (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 36

. -... ~ 600 - O Actual Divlsion Staffing 547 553 l Authorized Division Staffina, MWda g _i$.,$ m..-.

lid ] 4 gj 44 l-

- -.g 1 [Y,f 400-j aw $y s?sti:,t. t $p! M f[ uh: i k M$4fn-u i+k - 4# vR $$?I%M 201 205 {hy%!! Rj$8 200-r .w s&R 4 F@ %p",3 9989 j~ emp w

ve$!l

. hay 50 51-k f-W RR K l49% el1. a%~g. Q. ..phk TW Qtys,q n 0 i Nuclear Operations - Production Engineecing Nuclear Services STAFFING LEVEL The authorized and actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions. Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source) Accountability: Waszak Adverse Trend: None SEP 24 i (.- 37

Total Requalification Training Hours Simulator Training Hours 60-Non Requalification Training Hours ,1 3 Number of Exam Failures 41 40-36 36 1 30-28 24 24 /, 20-18 ? ,1 I7 /- 16 '/ 16 12 ') 2 !/ '/ /, 10- [ 8 % 8 ll 8 / '/ /, 6

/,

~ 4 /, -4 4 /,- 't ' // 2 // 2 '/ 2 /, n C ~ A A 'A 0 i i 4 -i i-i i Cycle 913 Cycle 91-4 Cycle 915 Cycle 916 Cycle 917 Cycle 921 Cycle 92-2 LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING - This indicator provides information on the total number of hours of training given to each crew during each cycle. The Simulator training hours shown on the graph are a subset-- of the total training hours. Non Requalification Training Hours are used for AOP/EOP l verification & validation, INPO commitments, GET, Fire Brigade, Safety Meetings, and Division Manager lunches. Exam failures are defined as failures in the written, simulator, and Job Performance Measures (JPMs) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training. The individual who failed the exam during Cycle 92-2 was remediated and was re-examined. Data Source: Gasper /Guliani (Manager / Source) Accountability: Gasper /Guliani Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 l l l l-38 .~

=- O SRO Exams Administered 50-0 SRO Exams Passed l 5 R0 Exams Administered 40-0 RO Exams' Passed L 30-7 10-5 l I fl [ F m 1-i- i i I i 1 4 4.. t I I May91 Jun Jul Aug' Sep Oct .Nov Dec Jan Feb. Mar-Apr92 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS This indicator shows the number of Senior ' Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Opera- . tor (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally'adminis- . te ad quizzes and exams are' used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress. During the month of April 1992, there were no (zero) intemally administered SRO ex-ams given.'There were no (zero) internally administered RO exams given.

During April, there were no (zero) SRO NRC administered site specific exams or RO NRC administered generic exans given.

Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source) Accountability: Gasper / Lazar ' Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 39-l l ,. ~ . -. a. -..-.

0 Hotlinesinitiated 35- @ Hotlines Cbsed o es e e< ee s 30- @ Hotlines Overdue > 4 Weeks 25-20-15- 'i. + 10-7?- f 1 5-l 5 ~ a j i E -E 7 3 ' -I E E E = 2 g I - d = E ~ ~ \\ 5 5 5 0-I ) i i I .I i l 1 i n 1-May91 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov .Dec -Jan Feb Mar Apr92 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS This indicator shows the number of Hotline Training Memos that were initiated, returned for close out, overdue less than four weeks, and overdue greater than four weeks for the reporting month. Anril 1992 Initiated Hotlines 11 Closed Hotlines 19 Hotlines Overdue < 4 wks. 3 Hotlines Overdue > 4 wks. 1 l Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source) - Accountability: Gasper l Adverse Trend: None l l 40

E Emergent MWOs 1100-Total Emergent MWOs 1000- --O-MWO Target / Week 900 - 800-700-600-500 - 400-300- / 200-75 [ I 94 78-89 1 97?-9-9-7-9-[ lil-5h, hn iha--E-B--&, 66 80-84 83-100-61 63 9 0 2/1 2/8 2/15 2/22 2/29 3/7-3/14 3/21 3/28 4/4 4/11 4/18.4/25 ~ 5/2 i EMERGENT MWOs APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN THE' CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE This indicator shows the total number of Emergent Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) l approved for inclusion in the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage scope, The total number of - MWOs and PMOs in the outage schedule on 2/1/92 was 3,509. The goal for the outage was to maintain emergent work at less than 20%, or no more than 702 emergent MWOs, during the outage. This number represents 59 MWOs per week for the twelve week outage. l Approximately 1,993 emergent MWOs were generated during the 1990 refueling out-age. Data Source: Patterson/Clemens (Manager / Source)- Accountability: Patterson/Clemens Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 1 1 41 ]

Violatioiw uer '000 Inspection Hours 9- --O-Fort Calhoun Goal e IGOODI t $6-5 E 8 3.7 5 2.6 ~ J~i ~~ l2 a i C O O O O O O O 0 i i i. i i i i i -i i i i i i '88 '89 SO Apr91 May Jun.Jul' Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 92 VIOLATIONS PER 1,000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per 1,000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator is one month behind the reporting' month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data. The violations per 1,000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 1.85 for the twelve months from April 1,1991 through March 31,'1992. This increase, which exceeds the g Fort Calhoun goal,is due to the identification of six violations in the recent' inspection Report 92-07. - The 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal is 1.5 violations'per 1,000 inspection hours for 1992. The 1991 goal was 1.6 violations per 1,000 inspection hours. Data Source: Short/Howman (Manager / Source) Accountability: Short Adverse Trend: None-l l l 42 l w c-m F -t N-e

. _ ~. _... _. ~.. _. -. _ _. 25 - --4p-- Nurrber of Violations During the Last 12 Months - + Number of NCVs During the Last 12 Months 20-15-10-M A A 5-0 0 0 0 Apr91 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec: Jan' Feb Mars 2 I CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVE-MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) l-The Cumulative Violations and Non-Cited Violations (NCVs) indicator shows the cumu-lative number of each for the last twelve months. l This indicator is one month behind the reporting rnonth due to the time involved with - j. collecting and processing the data. Data Source: Short/Howman (Manager / Source) ~ Accountability: Short ' Adverse Trend: None i l 'I u g

.-~ .. ~ 1991 SALP Functi Area - CARS Signif; CARS NRC Viola. LERs A) Plant Operations 30 1 1 6 B) Radiolog, Controls 12 0 3 0 C) Maint/ Surveil. 66 0' 2 9 D) Ernergency 16 0' O O Preparedness E) Security 5 0 1 3 F) Engr / Tech Suppori 93 3 1 12 G) Safety Assess > 27 1 1 2 Oual. Verif. H) Other 0 0 0 0 Total 249 5 9 32 1992 SALP Finct. ~ Area CARS Signif. CARS NRC Viola. 'LERs' A) Plant Operationi~ 9 (7) 0 0_ _4 B) Radiolog. Coairols 6(1)_ 0 6 (6) O C) Maint/ Surveil-74 (27) 1 0 3 (1) D) Ernergency 4 1 _1 0 Preparedness E) Security 1 0 0 1 F) Engr / Tech Suppori _13 (3) _0 0_ 5 G) Safety Assesss 13(4) 0 0 0 Qual. Verit. H_) Other 0 0 0 0 Tota 120(42) 2 7 (6) 13 (1) - Note: ( ) Inaicate values for the reporting month.: CARS ISSUF.D vs. SIGNIFIC ANT CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs. LERs REPORTED The above matrix shows the number of Corrective ' Action _ Reports (CARS) issued by the Nuc! ear Services Division (NSD) vs.the number of Significant CARS istad by NSD vs. the number of violations issued by the NRC for the Fort Calhoun. Station in 1991 andi 1992, included in these tables are the cumulative number of Ucensee Event Reports (LERs) issued for 1991 and 1992. The number of NRC violations reported is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the violations. l Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source) - Short/Howman_ (Manager / Source) Accountability: Andrews/Gambhlr/ Gates ' Adverse Trend; None SEP 15,20, 21 44 m .-.2., a u.

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK OR-DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE DERS (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE) l This indicator tracks the total number of outstanding cor-This indica!2r is defined as tne number of acddents for rective non outage Maintenance Work Orders at the Fort all utikty personnel permanently assigneo to the station, ( Calhoun Station versus their age in months. involving days away from work per 200,000 man hours l worked (100 man-years), This does not include contrac. j CARS ISSUED vs. ZGNIFICANT CARS vs. NRC VIO-tor personne'. This indicator tracks personnel perfor-LATIONS vs. LERs REPORTED mance for SEP 825 & 26. Provides a comparison of CARS issued, NRC violations, ano LEPs r6 ported. This inocator tracks perfortnance for DOCUMENT REVIEW GEP #15,20, A 21. The Docum6nt Review Indicator shows the number of documents reviewed, the number of documents sched-CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE ulv f for review, and the number of document reviews r Compares me Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate to that are overdue for tne reporting month. A document the industry chec4 vah,e f allure rate (1 allures per 1 million review is considered overdue if the review is not com-component hours). The data for the industry f ailure rate plete within 6 months of the assigned due date. This indi-is three months behind the PI Haport reporting month. cator tracks performance for SEP #46. This indicator trncks performance for SEP 843. EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM COLLEC TiVE RADIATION EXPOSURE PERFORMANCE Collective radiation exposure is the total external whole. The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) unavail-body dose receivod by all on-site personnel (including able and the estimated unavailable hours for the emer-contractors and visitors) du ing a time oeriod, as mea. gency AC power system for the reporting period divided sured by tne thermoluminescent dosime,er (TLD). Col-by the number of hours in the reporting perit.d mu'tiplied lective radiation exposure is reported in units of man-by the number of rains in the emergency AC power sys-rem This indicator tracks radiologicalwork performance

tem, for SEP #54 EMERGENT MWOa APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THE CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE i

THAN 3 MONTH 3 OLD (NON-OUTAGE) The total number of Emergent Maintenance Work Orders l The perconit.ge of total outstanding corrective mainte-(MWO2) approved for inclusion in the Cyde 14 Refuebng nance iteas, not requiring an outage, that are greater Outage scope. This indicator tracks performance fer SEP tnen three months cid at the end of the penod reported.

1. 31.

CUMULATIVE V OLKnONS & NON CITED VIOLA-EXPEDITED PURCHASES TIONS(12 MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) The percentage of expedited purchases which occurred The cumulative rumber of violations and Non C:ted Vio-during the reporting month compared to the total number lations for the last 12 months. of purchase orders generated. DECONTAM:NATED RADIATION CONTROLLED GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DIS-AREA CHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The percentage of the Radiation Controlled Area, which This indicator displays the total number of Curies of all include: the auxiliary building, the radwaste building, and gasecus radioactive nuchdes released from FCS. l areas of the C/RP building, that is decontaminated based I on the total square footage. This indicator tracks perfor. HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS mance for SEP # 54. The number of Hotline Training Memos (HTMs) that are initiated, closed, and overdue less or greater than 4 DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY weeks for the indicated month. A HTM is a training doca-This indicator provides monthly data on the number of ment sent out for immediate review. The HTM should be hours of diesel generator planned and unplanned un-reviewed and signed within 5 days of its recolp?. availability. The Fort Calhoun goalfor the second half of 1991 for the number of unavailable hours per diesel gen-LER ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN urator has been estabiWhed based upon the 1990 indus. This indicator shows the number and root cause type for try median value provided by INPO. Licensee Event Reports. 45

- - ~ - PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (cont'd) UCENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS ] This indicator shows the number of SRO and/or RO quiz. The number of radiological hot spots which have been zes and exams that are administered and passed each identifed and documented to exist at FCS at the end of onth. his indicator tracks training performance for ~ the reporting month. A hot spot is a smalllocali2ed .I source of radiation. A hot spot occurs when tt.e contact - -l d se rate of an item is at least 5 timos the General Area LICENTED OPERATOR REOUAUFICATION TRAIN-dose rate and the item s dose rate is equal to or greater ING than 100 mrem / hour. The total number of heiurs of training given to each crew during each cycle. Also provided are the simulator train-NUMBER OF OUT.OF SERVICE CONTROL RO( F ing hours (whbh are a subset of the total training hours), INSMENTS the number of noa requalification training hours and the A control room instrument that cannot perform its down number of exam iailures This indicator tracks training function is considered as out-of-servios. A control room performance for SEP #68. Instrument which has had a Maintenance Work Order-(MWO) written for it and has not been repaired by the UQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEiNG DISCHARGED end of the reporting period is considered out of service TO THE ENVIRONMENT and will be counted. The duratiofof the out of service This indicator dicplays the volume of liquid radioactive co n s mt ash. Comph Ws am not e waste released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks, s md as Wo%m hsWmes. to include releases through the plant blowdown if radio. active nuclides are detected in the blowdown system. NUMBER OF WSSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RE. The curies from all releases from FCS to the Missouri SULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS - River are also shown. The number of Surveillance Tests (STs) that result in see Event Reports (LERs) during the reportlag LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) th. This indicator tracks missed STs for SEP #60 & The total number of security incidents for the reporting month depicted in two graphs. This indicator tracks secu. rity performance for SEP #58, 1 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERS MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) attributed The number of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) components with more than 1 failure and the . to personnel error on the original LER submittal. This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP #15. numbe, cf NPRDS components with more than 2 failures for the last eighteen months. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The year to-da's budget mmpared to the actual expen-MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER B ACKLOG - ditures for Operations and Maintenance departments. The number of corrective non outage maintenance work orders that remain open at the end of the reporting PLANNED CAPABluTY LOSS FACTOR month. Tms mdicator was added to the Pl Report te. The ratio of the planned energy losses during a given trend open corrective non-outage maintenanes work or-ders as stated in SEP #36. - eriod of time, to the reference energy generation (the energy that could be produced if the unit were operated continuously at full power under reference ambient con-MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (COR. ditions), expressed as a percentage. RECTIVE NON-OUTAGE MAINTENANCE) This 'ndk.ator is a breakdown of corrective non-outage PROCEDURAL NONCOMPUANCE INCIDENTS maintenance work orders by savoral categories that re-(MAINTENANCE) main open at the end of the reporting month. This indica-The number of open and closed irs related to the use of tor tmcks maintenance performance for SEP #36. rocedures (includes the number of open and closed irs - MAINTENANCE OVERTIME. caused by procedural noncompliance), and the number f pr ceduraln n mpliance irs. This indicator trends. The percentage of overtime hours compared to normal Personnel erformance for SEP #15,41 & 44, P hours for maintenance. Th;s includes OPPD personnel as well as contract personnel.- - RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM MAX! MUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSU'RE The number of identified poor radiological work practicos The total maxirnum amount of radiation received by a fR@ for the reporting month. This indicator tracks raMogm, al we @maWor SW E person working at 1 CS on a monthly, quarterly, and an- . nual basis, p .46 l l t. a 4 -,,_.,.a.. m- ~.

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (cont'd) RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE

3) CCTV Failures Mechanical f ailures to all CCTV hard-The ratio of preventive maintenance (including surveil-ware components.

lance testing and caiibration procedures) to the sum of

4) CCTV Environs - Degradations to CCTV performance non outage corrective maintenance and preventrve main-as a result of environmental conditions (i.e, rain, snow, tent.nce completed over the reporting period. The ratio, frost, fog, sunspots, shade).

expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on man-

5) Security Computer Failures Failure of the multi-hours. This indicator tracks preventive maintenance ac-plexer, central processing unit, and other computer hard-tivities for SEP #41.

vare and software. This category does not include soft-ware prob!ams caused by operator error in using the RECORDABLE INJURY,1LLNESS CASES FRE' software.

QUENCY RATE

6) Search Equipment Failures Failures ef x ray, metal, The number of injuries requiring more than normal first or explosive detectors and other equipment used to aid per 200,000 man hours worked. This indicator trends search for contraband. This also includes incidents personnel performance for SEP #15,25 & 26, where the search equipment is hund to be defective or did not function properly during to: ' ig.

SECURITY NON SYSTEM FAILURES

7) Door Hardware Failures Failu,,, of the door alarm The folk) wing components are the types of loggable/re-and other door hardware such as latches, electric strikes, portable non system f ailures represented in this indica-doorknobs, locks, etc.

tor. Incidents in this category include security badges,

8) 1991 versus 1992 System Failures Statistics from access control and authorization, security force error, 1991 will be compared on a monthly basis with 1992 and unsecured doors.

loggablefroportable system failures.

1) Security Badges Incidents associated with improper This indicator tracks security performance for SEP *sa.

use and handling of security badges. Incidents include security badges that are lost, taken out of the protected STAFFING LEVEL area, out of control on stte, or inadvertently destroyed or The actual staffing level and the authorized staf0ng level broken. for the Nuclear Operations Division, the Production Engl-

2) Access Controland Authorization Administrative and neering Division, and the Nuclear Services Division. This procedural errors associated with the use of the card-indicator tracks performance for SEP #24.

access system such as tailgating, incorrect security badge issued, and improper escort procedures. This also TEMPORARY MODIFICA'l10NS includes incidents that were caused by incorrect access The number of temporary mechariical and electrical con-authorization information entored into the security sys-figurations to the plant's systems, tem computer.

1) Temporary configurations are defined as electrical

3) Security Force Error Events caused by membe s of jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical jumpers, or me-the security force that are found to be inattentive to their chanical blocks which are installed in the plant operating duties or who neglected to properly perform assigned systems and are not shown on the latest revision of the functions (e.g., required search procedure or patrol).

P&lD, schematic, connection, wiring, or flow diagrams.

4) Unsecured Doors Doors which are bund to be unse-

2) Jumpers and b!ocks which are installed for Surveil-cured with no compensatory officer posted or where the lance Tests. Maintenance Procedures, Cafit,,ation Pro-individual causing the alarm did not remain at the cedures, Special Procedures, or Operating Procedures alarmed door until a secunty officer responded. Events are not considered as temporary modifications un!ess the where an unsecured door is caused by av oressure are jumper or block remains in place after the test or proce-included in this category unters there is an indication that dure is complete. Jumpers and blocks installed in test or an adjustment was made to the door, lab instruments are no*. considered as temporary modifi-This indies tor tracks wecurity parfo mance for SEP #58.

cations.

3) Scaffolding is not considered a temporary modification.

SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES Jumpers and blocks which are installed and for which The following components are the types of loggable/re-MRs have been submitted will be considered as tempo-portable SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES represented in rary modifications until final resolution of the MR and the this indrator. Incidents in this category include alarm jumper or block is removed or is permanently recorded l system f ailures, CCTV f ailures, security computer f ail-on the drawings. This indicator tracks temporary modifi-ures, scarch equipment f ailures, and door hardware f ail-cations for SEP #G2 & #71, ures. These system failures are further categorized as follows:

1) Alarm System Failure - Detection system events in-volving fa!se/ nuisance alarms and mechanicalfailures.

2) Alarm System Environs Degradations to detection system performance as a result of environmental condi-tions (i.e., rain, snow, frost).

47

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DERNITIONS (cont'd) TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE The number of skin and clothing contaminations for the WAUTE reporting month. This indicator is defined as the volume of low level solid .adioactive was'e actually shipped for burial. This indica-UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS. tot also showche volume of low level radioactive waste i (INPO DEFINITION) which is in temporay storage, the amount of radioactive This indicator is defined as the sum of the following oil that has been shipped off site for processing (when safety system actuations: data is avai!Able), and the volume of solid dry radioactive j 1)The number of unplanned Emergency Core Coofing waste which has been shipped off site for processing, System (ECCS) actuations that result from reaching an Low-16 vel rio'id radioactive waste consists of dry active ECCS actuation setpoint or from a spurious / inadvertent wasto, sluiges, resins, and evanorator bottoms gener. ECCS signal. ated as a asult of nuclear power plant operation and 2)The number of unplanned emergency AC power sys-maintena"ce. Dry radioactive waste includes contami-tem actuations that result from a loss of power to a safe-nated rap, cleaning materials, disposable protective guards bus. An unplanned safety system actuation oc-clothing, plastic containers, and any other material to be cuts when an actuaton setpcint for a safety system is dispose ( of at a low level radioactive waste disposal site, reached or when a spurious or inadvertent s;gaal;3 gen-except rasin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level erated (ECCS only), and major equipment in the system ref ers tre all radioactive waste that is not spent f uel or a is actuated. Unplanned means that the systerr. actuation Dy-proovet of spent fuel process;ng. This indicator tracks was not part of a planned test or evolution. The ECCS radiole1 cal work performance for SEP #54, actuations to be counted are actuations of thr high pres-sure safety injection system, tre low pressure salcty in-jection system, or the safety injection tanks. UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS(NRC DEFINITION) The number of safety systcm actuations which include (gD!y.) the High Pressure Safety injection System, tha Low Pressure Safety inject'on System, the Safety injec-tion Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Genciators. The NRC classification of safwty system actuations includes actuations when major equipment is operated ad when the logic systems for the above safety systems are chal-lenged. VIOLATIONS PER 1,000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator is defined as the number of violations uited in NRC inspection reports for FCS per 1,000 NRC '.n-spection hours. The violations are reported in the year that the inspection was actually performed and not based on when the inspection report is received. The hours re-ported for each inspection report are used as the inspec-tion hours. l l 46 1

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performarce indicators Index is to list perfor-mance indicators related to SEP ltems with parameters inat can be trended. SEP Reference NumhgLHi Eggg trcrease HPES and IR Accountability Through Use of Perto mance Indicators Pmcedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance)........................................................ 17 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations................ ...............23 i Recordable injury /lliness Cases Frequency Rate............................................................ 34 Number of Personnel Errors Repo 1ed in LERs............................................. ..... 35 CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Viutations !ssued vs LERs Reported............. 44 - SEP Reference Number 20 Ouality Audits and Survellianco Programs are Evaluated, improved in Depth and Strengthened CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported....... 44 SEP R2!frence Number 21 Develop and Conduct Saf ety System Functional Inspections CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported........ 44 SEP Reference Number 24 Complete Staff studies Statfing Level .......................................37 SEP Reference Number 25 Training Program for Managers and Supervisors implemented - Disabling injury /llin es s Freque ncy R ate..............................................................._........... 7 Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate..................................,.................. 34 SEP Reference Number 28 Evaluate and implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements Disab!ing injury /lliness Frequency Rate........, ,..........,...........................................7 Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate............................................ 34 SEP Reference Number 31 Develop Outage and Maintenance Penning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training Emergent MWOs Approved for inclusion in the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage........................ 41 1 SEP Reference Number 36 Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Breakdown (Corrective Non-Outage Maintenance).............. 12 !~ Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage Maintenance). ..........18 i SEP Reference Number 41 Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance (Non-Outage). ...........14 Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance)....................,,. .... 17 - SEP Reference Number 43 . Implement the Check Valve Test Program C heck Va Ive Failu re Rat e................................................................................ 21 SEP Reference Number 44 Compliance With and Use of Procedures ...17 Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance). 49 ,. ~. __

-_.._.__..__..__.-_._.___..y.._ - SEP Reference Number 43 =l Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program - i Docu me nt R e vi ew.................................................................................................... SEP Reference Number 52 i Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practice:;. 'l Radiological Work Practices Program................................. ..................25-i i SEP Reference Number 54 Complete implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program- ~ Collective R ad iat ion Expo su re................................................................................................. 5 Volume of Low Level SOF41 Radioactive Waste............................................................ 6 Total Skin and Clottiing Co ntaminations...................................................................... 23 Decontaminated Radiation Controlled Area..................................................................... 24 i SEP Reference Number 58 Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Program Loggable/ Reportable Incide nts (Seeu rity)............................................................................. 29 Security Non System Fallures,............................................... .......... 3 0 - Securit y S yst e m Failu re s...................................................................................... 31 SEP Reference Number 80 Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensoe Everil Reports.......................... 19 SEP Reference Number 81 Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports...............,.........19 SEP Reference Number 82 Establish Interim System Engineers - Temporary Modifications (Excluding Scatiolding)................................................................ 33 SEP Reference Number 88 Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and Establish Means to Monitor Operator Training Licensed Operator Requalification Training.......................................................................... 38 Lice n se C andidat e Ex a ms................................................................................................ 39 SEP Reference Number 7i, Improve Controls Over Temporary Modifications Temporary Modifications (Excluding Scaffolding)................................................................ 33 o l 2 .I .) 1 50 i i ... ~,--..

REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST - R. L kndrews - K. B. Guliani - T. L Patterson E. R. Gundal R. T. Pearce

3. L. Anglehart W, R, Bateman R.H. Guy R. L. Phelps K. L. Betek R. M, Hawkins W.J.Ponec A. D. Bilau -

M. C. Hendrickson T. M Reisdor!! B. H. Blome R. R. Henning A. W. Richard C. N. Bloyd K. R. Henry D. G. Ried J.P.Bobba J. B, Herman G. K. Samide C. E. Doughter G. J. Hill T.J.Sandene-M. A. Breuer K. C. Holthaus B. A. Schmidt C. J. Brunnert L. G. Huliska S. T. Schmitz - M. W. Butt C.J. Husk F. C. Scofield C. A. Carlson R. L. Jaworski L. G. Sealock J. W. Chase : R. A.Johansan H. J. Sefick G. R. Chattleid W, C. Jones J. W. Shannon A. G. Christensen J. D. Kocy R. W. Short A. J. Clark J. D. Keppler - C. F. Simmons - O. J. Clayton D. D. Kloock E. L Skaggs R. P. Clemens - J. C. Knight J. L Skiles J. L Connolley D. M. Kobunski F. K. Smith G. M. Cook G. J. Krause RiL Sorenson M. R. Core L. J. Kripal J. A. Spilker S. R. Crites J. G Krist K. E. Steele D. W. Dale J. B. Kuhr W. Steele R. C. DeMeulmeester L T. Kt.sek H. F. Sterba : R. D. DeYoung L.E. Labs G. A.Teeple ' D. C. Dietz M. P. Lazar M. A.Tesar J. A. Drahota R. C. Learch T. G. Therkikisen T. R. Dukarski S.E. Lee-J. W. Tills D. L Eid R. E. Lewis D. R. Trausch l R. G. Eurich R. C. Liebentritt P. R. Turner H. J. Faulhaber B. R. LMngston - J. M. Uhland l M. A. Ferdig J. H. MacKinnon C.F.Vanecek-V. H. Frahm G, D. Mamoran J. M. Waszak F. F. Franco J. W. Marcil G. R; Williams M. T. Frans - N. L Marfice. - S. J. Willrett H. K. Fraser D. J. Matthews W. C. Woerner J. F. W. Friedrichsen J. M. Mattice S, K. Gambhir T. J. Mcivor J. K. Gasper K. S. McCormick W. G. Gates R. F. Mehaffey - M. O. Gautier K. G. Melstad S. W. Gebers K. J. Morris 1 J. M. Glantz D. C. Mueller. J. T. Gleason : R. J. Mueller i L. V. Goldberg J. B. Newhouse D. J. Golden M. W. Nichols - D. C. Gorence - C. W. Norris R. B. Gray. J. T. O'Connor M. J. Guinn W. W. Orr - G. E. Guliani L. L. Parent 51 a. u

_.. ~ _. - _ _ _ r 1 POSITIVE TREND REPORT INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT ) The Positive Trend Report highlights selected Perfora i mance Indcators with data representing continued per-formance above the stated goal and indicators with data This secton lists the indicators which show inadequacies represerwing significant improvement in recent months, as compared to the OPPD goal and indicators which - thow inadequacies as compared to the industry upper The ic!!owing indicator has been selected as exhibiting a ten percentile. The indicators will be compared to the. ] positive trend for the reporting monthf industry upper ten percentile as relevant to that Indicator. Temocrarv ModNientions - Ritabhno iniurvilfMess Frecuency Rata (Lost Timo Acci-(Page 33) - M Rate) The Fort Calhoun goal of no (zero) temporary modifica. (*[*h ( W hM tons greater than one fuel cycle old has been achieved. dent rate) reported this month (0.90) excoods the Fort End of Positive Trend Report Calhoun goal of 0.30. Number of Out-of. Service Control Room Instrt.monts (Page 15) The number of out-of ssrvice control room instruments for the reporting month (22) exceeds the Fort Calhoun ADVERSE TREND REPORT goaiot14. A Performance Indicator which has data representing Ma!Dignance Work Order Baek'22 - c three (3) consecutive months of declining performance : (Page 18) ~ constitutes an adverse trend. The Adverse Trend Report The number of corrective non outage maintenance work explains the conditions under which certah indicators are - orders remaining open at the end of the reporting month showing adverse trends. (389) exceeds the Fort Calhoun goal of 350. The felbwiag indicators exhibited adverse trends for the Total Skin and Clothinc ContamingEIDS reporting month: (Page 23). Ace of Outstandino MaMtenance Work Orders (corree- .The total number of skin and clothing mntaminations tive Non-Outaae) reported in 1992 (203) exceeds the Fort Calhoun goal of ~ 144-(Page 11) An adverse trend is indicated basN on thr9e consecu-tive months of increasing values for corrective nonout-Eroedited Purchases age MWOs 3 6 months old and MWOs >12 nionths oldi - (Page 32) This trend is due to the Cycle 14 Refue!ing Outage. The percentage of expedited purchases compared to total purchases for the reporting month (1.79%) exceeds Maintenance Work Order Breakdewn (Corrective Non, the Fort Calhoun goa! of 0.5%. OMAQ11 (Page *2). Vi lations oer 1000 Insoection Hours - An adverse trend is indicated based on three consecu-(Page 42). tive months of increasing values for corrective non-out, The violations per 1,000 inspection hours (calculated age oren MWOs >3 months old and open safety related using a twelve month interval) reported this month (1.85) MWOs 3 months old.This trend is due to the Cycle 14 exceeds the t ort Calhoun goal _of 1.5. Refueling Outage. End of Management Attention Report; End of Adverse Trend Report. J u .l 1 52 V a.-

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES This report has been abbreviated to allow some perfor, mance indicator data sources to dovote more time to refueling outage activities. Publication of allindicators will resume in the May 1992 report. INPO industry upper ten percentile va' as (extrapolated from the 1991 Year End Report) have replaced industry median values where appropriata. Disablino loiurv/fliness Frecuenev Rate (Paga 7) The five year average late and industry median value have been deleted to clarify the graph. Recordable Iniurv'lliness Cases Frecuency Rate (Page 34) Tts five year average rate has been deleted to clanfy the graph. B End of Indicator improvement / Changes Report. 5: 5 1 53

FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OCAGE DATES Event Date Range Productl n (MWH) Cumubive (MWH) Cycle 1 09/26/73 02/01/75 3,299,639 3,299,639 1st Refuell.)g 02/01n5 -05/09/75 Cycle 2 05/09,75 10/01/76 3,853,322 7,152,961 2nd Refueling 10/01n6 12/13/76 Cycle 3 12/13/76 9/30/77 2,805,927 9,958,B88 3rd Refueling 09/30/77 12/09/77 Cycle 4 12/09/77 10/14/78 3,026,832 12,985,720 4th Refueling 10/14/78 12/24/78 Cycle 5 12/24/78 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 5th Refueling 01/18/80 06/11/80 Cycle 6 06/11/80 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 6th Refusling 09/18/81 12/21/81 Cycle 7 12/21/81 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 71h Refueling 12/06/82 04/07/83 Cycle 8 04/07/83 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 8th Refueling 03/03/84 07/12/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 9th Refueling 09/28/85 01/1W86 Cycle 10 01/16/86 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 10th Refueling 03/07/87 06/08/87 Cycle 11 06/08/87 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 11th Refueling 09/27/88 01/31/89 Cycle 12 01/31/89 02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 12th Refueling 02/17/90- 05/29/90 Cycle 13 05/29/90 02/01/92 5,451,069 51,040,528 13th Refueling 02/01/92 04/26/92 (Planned Dates', Cycle 14# 04/26/92-09/19/93 14th Refueling ')9/19/93 11/13/93 Cycle 15 11/13/93 03/12/95 151h Refueling 03/12/95 05/06/95 FORT CALHOUN STATION CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS " RECORDS" First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47 p.m.) First Electricity Supplied to the System August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH) September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%) - May 4,1974 Longest Run (477 days) June 8,1987 Sept. 27,1988 Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468,800 KWH) October 1987 Most Productive Fuel Cycle (5,451,069 MWH)(Cycle 13) May 29,1990 Feb.1,1992}}