ML20101B207
| ML20101B207 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley, Millstone, Palo Verde, Catawba, Harris, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Byron, Braidwood, Seabrook, Limerick, River Bend, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, South Texas, Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 04/19/1990 |
| From: | Schlissel D AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Grimsley D NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20101B168 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-96-82 NUDOCS 9603140110 | |
| Download: ML20101B207 (2) | |
Text
-
SCHLISSEL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES 45 HORACE ROAD BELMONT, MA 02178 (617) 489-2527 April 19, 1990 Donnie H. Grimsley I'
",,,,O.cl.W D E1ATl0N Director Division of Freedom of Information ACT REQUEST and Publication Services
[C U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
~kO ~/[f h /g g~dJ -9Q Room P-378 7920 Norfolk Avenue r
Bethesda, Md. 20814 Mr. Grimsley:
This is a Freedom of Information Act request for the following information:
1.
A description of the Regulatory Information Tracking System, including the manpower information included in the system and the manpower data available from the system; 2.
The manhours expended annually by the NRC on inspections at each of the following plants for each of the years 1974 through 1988:
Comanche Peak South Texas Project Waterford 3 Wolf Creek River Bend Catawba Palo Verde Callaway Harris Byron Braidwood Beaver Valley 2 Vogtle Millstone 3 Seabrook Grand Gulf Limerick Hope Creek 1/
KIMBAROV96-82 PDR I
l Donnie H. Grimsley April 19, 1990 Page Two l
3.
The manhours expended annually by the NRC on the l
licensing of each of the following plants for each of the years 1974 through 1988:
Comanche Peak South Texas Project Waterford 3 Wolf Creek River Bend Catawba Palo Verde Callaway Harris Byron Braidwood Beaver Valley 2 Vogtle l
Millstone 3 Seabrook Grand Gulf Limerick Hope Creek Thank you in advance for your prompt response to this request.
If you need additional information concerning this request, please call me at (617) 489-2527.
Sincerely, Y.
ur David A. Schlissel l
l
aw e.
S.
o o
s Statt OF ~tw vomm l
C KECUTIVE DE PARTMENT STA TE CONSUME R PROTE CTION BOARD l
l n wa s o.o vo~ ava us atea~,
e w,ona insio u ns~ s suaevaiu November 1, 1982 u riu r, i~ rr ava -o= u~ir c a.. a... c...........
FREEDOM OF INFORMATK)N ACT REQUEST Mr. Joseph Felton For Director, Division of Rules
'68 and Records Freedom of Information Act Office R d // - V- / 2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1717 H.
- Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20555 i
Re:
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST Mr. Fc1 ton:
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C.A.5552, the New York State Consumer Protection Board, Ms. Karen S.
Burstein, and David A.
Schlissel hereby request that the records listed below be made availabic for immediate public inspection and copying.
As the documents will be used by the Consumer Protection Board in Public Service Commission Case 28166 on behalf of the interests of the ratepayers of the Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation, we request that all fees be waived pursuant to 5 U.S.C. AS552 (4) ( A) and lo C.F.R. 59.14(a).
Public Service Commission Case 28166 concerns the accident at the R.E.
Ginna Nuclear Facility last January and will decide who should pay for excess fuel and purchased power costs, ratepayers or stockholders of RG&E.
The documents sought in this request will be used as part of cross-examination and direct testimony filed by the staff of the Consumer Protection Board on behalf of RG&E ratepayers.
We request a substantive reply to this Freedom of Information Act Request within 10 working days.
5 U.S.C. A.5552 (6) (A) and 10 C.F.R. 9.8(c).
This Freedom of Information Act Request seeks access to the following documents for inspection and copying l
pd/r)')O/)7~'[ -
owivw </.. s
~..
o o
1.
Copies of all reports, memoranda, correspondence, or other documents, records, or work products, identifying, listing, discussing, analyzing, suggesting, recommending, or reporting the procedures used for the downcomer flow resistance plate l
removal modifications at the following facilities:
Turkey Point Unit 4 in May, 1975; Robinson Unit 2 in November, 1975; Turkey Point Unit 3 in November-December, 1975; Indian Point 3 and Point Beach Units 1 and 2 in 1976.
l This request includes, but is not limited to all reports, i
memoranda, correspondence, or other documents, records or work products, identifying, listing, discussing, recommending reporting the quality assurance procedures and/or the orprocedures for material accountability used during those renoval modifications.
2.
A copy of the Gray Book (WASH 1283) and the Orange Book (WASH 1284) in effect in April, 1975.
3.
Copies of any technical information letters, advisories, alerts, reports, studies, analyses, or other correspondence, documents, records, or work products, distributed to the Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation and/or any other owner or operator of a pressurized water reactor facility, by the NRC or NRC personnel (as that term is defined in 10 C.F.R.59.3a) concerning any of the following events:
The October, 1979 steam generator tube rupture at the Prairie Island 1 facility; 1
The September, 1976 tube rupture at the Surry 2 1
facility; The 1979 discovery of loose parts in a steam generator at the North Anna 1 facility; l
The February, 1980 discovery of loose parts in a steam generator at the North Anna 1 facility; The March, 1978 discovery of loose parts at the Crystal River 3 facility; The July, 1977 discovery of loose parts at the Davis-Besse 1 facility.
.w-l O
s-4.
Provide copies of any technical information letters, advisories, alerts, reports, studies, analyses, or other correspondence, documents, records, or other work products distributed to the Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation since January 1, 1975 from the NRC or NRC personnel advising, recommending, suggesting, or discussing the need for inspection for the presence of foreign objects or loose parts inside steam generators.
5.
With regard to page 5-47 of the Ginna Restart Safety Evaluation Report (NUREG 0916), provide copies of any reports, studies, analyses, or other correspondence, documents, records, or work products, prepared by the NRC, NRC personnel, the Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation, or the Westinghouse Corporation, their agents or employees, which were developed or used in arriving at, and/or are in l
support of, the conclusion that " Material accountability controls in use during the 1975 downcomer resistance plate removal modification were ineffective in detecting the i
presence of foreign material located in the secondary
}
side of the steam generators." Provide copies of any such correspondence, documents, records, or work products i
for each of the four specific deficiencies identified on page 5-47 immediately following the statement quoted above.
6.
With regard to the statement of page 5-22 of NUREG 0916 that "Many of these features are suggestive of a mechanical or peening-like action on the surface of the tube such as i
might be cause by a foreign object", provide copies of any correspondence, documents, records, or other work and/or products which were developed or used in arriving at, are in support of, this statement.
Please also provide l
copies of any studies, reports, analyses, correspondence, documents, records, or other work products prepared by the NRC consultant identified in that same paragraph on page 5-22 of NUREG 0916.
7.
With regt d to the statement on page 5-12 of NUREG 0916 that "This peripheral pattern of tube degradation is not typical of the corrosion problems which have been experienced by the industry" and the statement on page 5-9 of NUREG 0916 that "With the exception of tube degradation at the periphery of the hot-leg in B-steam generator..." provide copies of any studies, reports, analyses, correspondence, documents, records or other work products prepared since April 1, 1975 by the NRC, NRC personnel, RG&E, or Westinghouse Corporation, their agents or employees, which identify, indicate or discuss in what manner the tube degradation was not typical of that experienced by the industry and/or which identify, for indicate, analyze, study or discuss possible causes this atypical degradation.
r 1
9 9
On behalf of the State Consumer Protection Board, Ms.
Burstein and myself, I would like to thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this request.
Sincerely, David A.
Schlissel, Of Counsel h
4....
O O
I n r.Ga N TH FP;*r S Hi314 m. 00 49 98 Of Nf w Toma
{#t gy t a r c ij f tyt ot, A nt e.a t N T g
J ST ATE CONSUMER PROTECTION SOARD l
....w.c.n~...~,,,
.t
.~....., n.a e n.o l
I March 10, 1984 dichard Kessel
..... ~..
Mr. Joseph Harris Chief of FOIA and Privacy Act Branch U.S. Department of Energy FREEDOM OT l'Jf 0WATION 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W.,
1 ACT Hi QUf Si Washington, D.C.
20585 FOTAs'- p Freedom of Information Act Request 3 w- -f Y Mr. Harris:
State Consumer Protection hard and vid C
The New York Schlissel request that copies of the documents listed below t
be provided to them pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Section 552.
i Please note that when the term documents is used in this request it is intended to include, but not to be limited to, all reports, analyses, studies, books, articles, results, correspondence, memoranda, computer records, test alerts, advisories, and/or other writings or work products located in the files of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.
Please provide the following documents:
1.
" Corrosion of various Materials in High Temperatute Water," U.S. A.E.C. Report BW-5250, by L.H. Vaughan and K. Mildred Ferguson, dated June 25, 1957.
2.
" Boiling Water Reactor Technology Status of the Art Report, Vol. II, Water Chemistry and Corrosion", US A.E.C. Repo r t ANL-6562, dated i
February, 1963.
l 3.
All US A.E.C. Research & Development Reports prepared by or in conjunction with E.I. DuPont de Nemours &
Co., at the Savannah River Laboratories on the subject of the stress corrosion cracking of austenitic stainless steels.,
4.
" Investigation of the Initiation and Extent of Duct il e P ipe Ruptu r e", by R.J. Eibe r, W. A. M a xey, A.R. Duffy & T.J. Atterbury, Bate 11e Memorial Institute Reports BMI-1866 and 1908, dated Jul I
1969 and June, 1971 respectively.
chl l l q n s,,,
n o i sp
I o
Joseph Harris - FOIA March 10, 1984 Page Two 5.
Argonne Report ANL-5314 by S.C. Datsk, dated 1954.
6.
US A.E.C. Report TID-7006 by D.J. DePaul, dated 1957.
7.
"Some Facts About the Stress Corrosion of Austenitic Stainless Steels in Reactor Systems,"
W.E. Berry, dated Spring, 1964.
8.
A list of all US A.E.C. sponsored and/or funded research projects, studies, and/or other reports on the following subjects:
Stress corrosion of stainless steels a.
Stress corrosion cracking of stainless steels b.
Intergranular stress corrosion cracking of c.
stainless steels Corrosion of stainless steels in the high d.
temperature, high purity environments found in boiling water reactors.
9.
All documents that were used by, reviewed by, relied upon, or developed by the A.E.C.
staff in the drafting of Regulato ry Guide 1.4 4, which was issued in May of 1973.
Specifically, this request
/
is not to be limited to draf ts of Regulatory Guide f
1.44. It is to also include, but not to be limited f
instructions f rom the Commission to the to, all Staff, and correspondence between the Staff and industry sources.
10.
" Corrosion and Compatibility",
W.E.
- Berry, Battelle Memorial Institute, dated June, 1971.
All documents prepared by the General Electric 11.
Company which discuss any of the following subjects:
Stress corrosion of stainless steels a.
Stress corrosion cracking of stainless steels b.
Intergranular stress corrosion cracking of c.
stainless steels
M --
O o
Joseph Harris - FOIA March 10, 1984 Page Three d.
Corrosion of stainless steels in the high temperature, high purity environments in boiling water reactors.
The New York State Consumer Protection Board and David Schlissel request that in the event these documents are not located in the A.E.C. files in your possession, you forward the request to the appropriate laboratories.
The New York State Consumer Protection Board and David Schlissel further rcquest that you waive all copying and search f ees pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Section 552 (a)(4)(A)
"because furnishing the inf ormation can be: considered as primarily benefitting the general public.*' The f ollowing facts support this request:
The New York State Consumer Protection Board is an 1.
agency of the Executive Department of State of New created under the authority of Section 550, York,seg. of the Executive Law of the State of New et.
i
- York, l
The New York State Consumer Protection Board is 2.
authorized to intervene on behalf of the consumern of New York State in proceedings before the New York State Public Service Commission.
These documents will assist the New York State 3.
Consumer Protection Board in its intervention in a number of proceedings now pending before the New York State Public Service Commission.
I The size of the population potentially benefitted 4.
by these documents represents the millions of ratepayers of the six private electric utility companies in New York State which own nuclear power facilities in operation or under construction.
in advance for your prompt assistance.
Thank you Sincerely,
% dd.S & ?
David A.l Schlissel, on behalf of himself and the New York l State Consumer Protection Board 6