ML20100Q423
| ML20100Q423 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 03/04/1996 |
| From: | NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20100Q401 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9603110629 | |
| Download: ML20100Q423 (2) | |
Text
4 pQ 0800 fY k
UNITED STATES 4
s g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION t
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20666 4001
\\..... / -
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMEN @ENT NO.183 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-16 GPU NUCLEAR CORPORATION AND JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-219
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated December 5,.1995, the GPU Nuclear Corporation (the licensee) submitted a request for changes to the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Technical Specifications (TS). The requested changes would revise the submittal date for the Annual Exposure Data Report bringing Oyster Creek into conformance with 10 CFR 20.2206 and relaxes an overly restrictive administrative requirement.
2.0 EVALUATION The. licensee proposes to revise the submittal date for the Annual Exposure Data Report covering the previous year, on or before April 30, of each year, from the current March 1, date. The April 30 date is in accordance with 10 CFR 20.2206. Therefore, the staff finds the administrative change acceptable.
3.0 STATE CONSULTATION
In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the New Jersey State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
The amendment relates to changes in recordkeeping, reporting, or adminstrative procedures or requirements. Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(10).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.
9603110629 960304 PDR ADOCK 05000219 P
)
5.0 CONCLUSION
1 The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the l
public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor:
A. Dromerick Date:
March 4, 1996
)
1