Text

Performance Indicators,Dec 1991
	ML20100P896
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	01/23/1992
From:	; OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20100P894	List: ML20100P892; ML20100P896;
References
	NUDOCS 9201310169
	Download: ML20100P896 (175)
	v • d • e

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

.. '.,== -' u _..-,=...

.n _... _. --., - - -. - - -

. : =.:

FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS DECEMBER 1991 y

7 s*

7 Prepared by:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group

{$013}.00$OS00hj5

. ~.

hswl of eaw%a w wn, aLL...

d lawok wisdarn, wnd sownd jud anmi...

y d w a, &fahans, canwo-loaj, cornandanud...

d w a, way, af bln,...d w dating, lhjob nighi l% lind %, wwuj, %.

al w iauna-diachd, vol ik assall of eibunal pnaswa, a w owv own,4 waa w!w ws ano, wnd th aida, wnd salp%hos p

thal corns lnoim, kng, lh nighi knd of peuwn,, neljal is dating, ik ughi Uusup.

Jauns ).L9%nwu

1 OMAH A PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORM ANCE INDICATOR REPORT Prepared By:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group DECEMBER 1991

I ABSTRACT PURPOSE The

Performance Indicators Program" is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun p' ant perior-mance information to OPPD's personnel responsible fo* optimizing unit performanca. The information is presented in a way that provides ready identification of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing and monitoring Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on saf ety and reliability. Some periormance indcators show company goals or industry information. This information can be used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation.

SCOPE The conditions, goals, and projections reflected within this report are current as of the end of the month being reported, unless otherwise stated.

In order for the Periormance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelir.es were followed while implementing it.e program:

1) Data was selected which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.

2) Established corporate goals and industry information were included for ccmparison.

3) Formal definitions were developed for each performarce parameter to ensure consistency in future reports and alb - comparison with industry averages where appropriate.

Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that tais program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report. Please refer comments to the System Engineering Department s Test and Performance Group. To increase personnel awareness of Fort Calhoun Station's plargeriormance, it is suggested that this repori be distributed throughout your respective departments.

REFERENCES INPO Good Practices OA 102,'Periormt ;o Monitoring - Management Information" INPO Report Dated November 1984," Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" NUM ARC 87-00," Guidelines and Technical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Station Black-out at Light Water Reactors", Revision 1, Appendix D,"EDG Reliability Program", dated April 6,1990.

Table of Contents / Summary INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS f2GE enUST RY

,Qff,2, Qf,EQ UPf*FR m.

QQ6L TH!S LONTH t.AST LOMiH 1[Qi2 FORCED OUTAGE RATE.

. 0.25%..

.24%.

. 9 28%..

.14 0%.

l..

.5 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL..

.. o..

.. o

.. 0..

..o.

..l.,

.7 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM AC11)ATIONS - (INPO DEFINITON)..

. 0..

.. o.

1..

.9 GROSS HEAT RATE..

.. 9.935..

10.250..

10.023.

. 10.016.

.. l.-

.13 EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR.......

.. 82 5%.

. 69'4..

.100%..

..l.,

,15 UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR.

,. N A..

. 00%... 100%..

.100%..

.. l..

.17 FUEL RELLABILITY INDICATOR.

_ _...... N A.

. 0 75..

. 3 66.

.28.

.. D.

.19 PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE ruwumn..166.

. 75.

. 51.9.

. 48 5.

.. N A.., 21 VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLIO RADIOACTIVE WASTE...

. 3.072..

. 4,500..1,120 7..

. 1.000 4.

.. N A... 23 DIDABLING INJUflY/lLLNESS

..o.

..o 31.

. 0.37.

. 0.40.

..NMA.. 25 FREQUENCY RATE........

OPERATIONS 12GE NOUST RY

,,QfPf,Q,,

QPf,Q UPDf-H % QQ6L TH!S LOMTH tAST LCW1H E*jQ STATION NET GENERATION (10,000 Mwh)..

.. N A..

.. NA..

. 36 2..

,,35.

.. l....

.3 FORCED OUTAGE RATE.

..o 25%..

. 2 4%..,. 9 28%..

t 4 0%.

.. l..

.5 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL.

. 0..

.0..

.0.

.. l..

.7 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -(INPO DEFINITION)..

. 0..

..o.

.. l..

.. 9 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (NRC DEFINITION)..

. 0..

.0..

. 0..

..o.

.. l..

.,11 GROSS HEAT RATE...

. 9.935..

. 10.250... 10.023..

. 10.016

.. l.

.13 EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR..

.825%,

. 69%... 100%..

.100%..

..I.

.15 UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR,

.. N A.,

. 90%...100%.

.100%.

..l..

.17 FUEL RELIABILITY INDIC/, TOR.

.. N A.

. N A..

. 3 66.

.28.

.D.

.19 DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT.

.. N A.

. N A..

.. N A..

.. N A... 27 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS.

.. N A.

.. N A..

. 0 50..

. 0 69.

.. l..

, 29 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET..

.. NA.

.. N A..

. NA..

.. N A... 31 DOCUMENT REVIEW.

.. NA..

N A..

. N A..

.. NA..

.. N A... 33

MAINTENANC.E PAGE W9JSTRY

,CffQ, Qff,Q L'P PE R %

QQQ,, TH!S LONTH LMT LVWTH IPIND EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY........

.. N A..

.. N A.

.. NA.

.. N A..

.. N A... 35 DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS).

,, N A..

. NA..

.. NA..

.NA...36 DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY..

.. NA..

.. N A..

.. N A... 37 AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE)... N A..

.. NA..

. NA..

NA..

.. N A... 38 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE).

.. NA..

.. N A..

. N A..

.. N A... 39 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON-OUTAGE)........

. 458%..

.45%.

. 32.3%..

. 24 5%.

.. D.. 41 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON OUTAGE)...

, S7.7.

.60%.

. 52 7%..

. 517%.

..NMA. 43 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE..

1.2%..

. 1.0%... 0.16%..

. 1.1 %..

.. I.... 45 NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS..

..7.._..

.. < 15..

. 20..

.14.

..NMA.. 47 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME...........

.. NA..

.25%.

.121%.

. 9%..

.. D.. 49 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE),...

.. N A..

.. NA.

.4.

..o.

.. N A... 51 LLAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE MAINTENANCE)..

.. NA.

.. <4 50..

.266.

.318.

.. l.. 53 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE)..

.. NA..

. 80%..

.. N A..

.. N A... 54 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE EQUIPMENT)..

.. N A..

. 80%..

.. N A..

.. N A... 55 t

PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEOULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (GENERAL MAINTENANCE)....

.. N A..

.80%.

. N A..

.. NA..

.. N A.,. 56 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE)..

.. NA..

.80%.

.. N A..

.. N A... 57 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL).

.. NA..

. 80%..

.. NA..

N A..

NA...58 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS.

.. N A..

. NA.

,.0.

.0,

.l.

. 61 ii

MAINTENANCE (cont'd))

PAGE wousTrif

.QEc2.

OceD UPPER iM M TH!s L40 NTH tAsT l.DITH 1B[,,!Q NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS) REPORTABLE FAILURES.

.. N A..

NA.

. 0..

.0.

.. NA.

,. 62 NUMBER OF NPRDS MULTIPLE FAILURES.

.. NA..

N A..

.. N A.

.. N A..

.. NA.

.,63 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS,

.. N A..

.. N A.,

.. N A..

.. NA.

. 65

' CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE...

.. NA -. 2 00E4. 6 07E-7.

_ E.07E.7.

NA.

.67 CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION PAQE tnousTny

.cegg,.

geen UPPrA 1h M TH!S P.43MTH LAST L4#*ITH TREND PERSONNEL RADIATON EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE).

. 166..

. 75.

. 51.9..

. 48.5..

. N A... 2t VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADCACTIVE WASTE.......

. 3.072..

. 4.500.. 1.120 7..

. 1.000 4.

.. N A... 23 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY.

. 0.24.

. 0 45..

.0.463.

. 0.436..

.. N A... 69 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT.

..... N A..

. 2%..

. 0%..

.. l..... 71 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUTFIDE STATION LIMITS.,..

. 2.6*

.. NA.

.,0.

.. o.

.. l.,

. 73 IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF SERVICE.........

.. NA.

. 6..

. 17..

.6,

.. NMA.. 75 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED.

.. NA -..

.. N A..

. 154.5.

.0.

.. D... 77 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATON EXPOSURE (mrem)..,

...... N A..

.. N A.

. 259..

. 266..

.. D... 79 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS,

...... 129'

.. 90..

.. 55..

. 55.

.. N A...... 81 DECONTAMINATED RADIATION

....... NA..

.85%.

. 89 9%..

. 89 9%.

.. l..

. 83 CONTROLLED AREA..

RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM...

.. N A..

.. N A.

. 2..

.0.

.. D... 85 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS.

.. N A.

. 41..

. 63..

. 63.

..N M A. 87 GASEOUS RAbOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT (curies)..

.. N A.

.340.

.. NA..

.. N A..

.. N A... 89 LIQUID RADOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT.,.

.. N A.

.225.

.. NA.

.. NA..

.. N A... 91 iii

L SECURITY PAGE eausTny QEta REEQ upern c.

m THts TENTH t Ast tonH Hg,tQ LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY).

.. NA..

., N A.

. 45.

. 58.

. N A... 93 SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN.,

.. N A..

.. N A.

,, N A..

.. N A.. 94 SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES.,.

... N A..

.. NA..

.. N A.

.. N A..

.. N A... 95 MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES EAG.E AusInt crea ceca Qgp;m m THis tonH 1.AST konH Ifigg AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAIT!NG PARTS (NON-OUTAGE)..

... N A.

. 3 5%..

.1.9%.

.20%.

., l.

. 97 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE (5 millsn)...... N A..

.. N A..

. 14 1.

.13 8.

.. NA.

99 SPARE PARTS ISSUED ($ thousands).......

... N A..

.. NA..

. 242.7..

.176 8..

.. N A.. 99 INVENTORY ACCURACY.

.. NA..

. 98%.. 98 3%.

. 98%..

.. I,

.101 STOCKOUT RATE.

.. N A..

. 2%.

. 2 4%..

.26%.

. NMA..101 EXPEDITED PURCHASES..

.. NA.

. 0 5%.

.1%,

.0%.

..NMA

.103 INVOICE BREAKDOWN.....

.. N A..

.. NA.

.. NA..

.. N A...105 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING..

.. NA..

.. N A... 38 9%....... 38.5%.

.. NA...105 DESIGN ENGINEERING Egu.

INDUST RY QDEQ QEf,Q UDPER 10%

m TH!S LONTH t.AST l.oHH IBfQlQ OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS.,

.. N A..

.. NA.

.264.

.270.

.. N A...,107 TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING).....

.. NA.

. 0..

. 21.

. 22.

..NMA. 102

-crJGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUESTS (EAR) BREAKDOWN.

... N A..

.. N A.

,.126..

.120.

.. N A...109 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS,

.. NA..

.. NA.

.168.

.1*

.. N A..111 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDCWN... N A..

.. NA..

.. NA.

.. N/...

.. N A..113 iv

INDUSTRI AL S AFETY EAGE teuSTnY QM QC[Q upern 5%

m THis LOtml LASt komH IIE.N2 DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE.

..o.

. o 31.

. o 37..

.. o 40.

.. NMA,. 25 RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY RATE..,....

.. N A..

N A..

_ 3 32.

. 373

.. A..115 HUMAN RESOURCES EAQE l@ USTRY OCEQ Q,P,EQ overR M QQ6L TH'S AOmH LAST LOPH I,[E,SQ NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERs,

.. N A

.. N A.

.3_

. 2..

.A.

.117 STAFFING LEVEL.

.. N A.

. N A..

.NA.

.. N A..

.. N A...118 PERSONNEL TURNOVER dATE.

.. N A..

.. N A.

.. N A -

N A...118 TRAINING AND OUALIFICATION EAGE in w Tny QEED DEED UPPF A M QQ4L THis AOCH LAST LONTH I,[g,$Q LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING.,..

.. N A..

.. NA.

.. N A..

.. N A.. 119 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS..

.. N A..

.. N A.

.. NA..

.. N A..,,121 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS,.._.....

.. N A..

.. NA..

.. NA.

.. NA..

.. N A...123 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS.

.. N A.,

.. NA,.

. 2,044..

. 2,241..

..N A...125 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING..

.. N A..

.. NA... 10,180.

. 0,538..

.. N A...127 REFUELING OUTAGE EAGE WOUSTRY QECQ QEEQ UPPER M QQ6L TH'S kONTH LAST Ar4NH Jg,3Q MWO PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE).

.. NA..

.NA.

C99.

989.

..NA..

128 EMERGENT MWO PLANNING STATUS....

.. NA.

.. N A..

.. NA.

.. NA..

.. N A..129 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 14 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING.,...

.. NA..

.. N A.

. 33..

.33.

.. N A...130 OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE).

..NA..._..

.. NA 25.

. 25.

. N A...131 v

I 00ALITY ASSURANCE -

E, AGE NDlfSTRY QPfQ -

QffQ unern m QQ6L THis wwtH LAST MONTH IREND VOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS,.........NA..

1.6..

. 0 84

. 1.16..

.. l....133 COMPARISON OF VIOLATONS AMONG REGION IV PLANTS..................................NA.

.. N A..

.. NA..

.. N A...135 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs -

OWELVE. MONTH RUNNING TOTAL)...............NA,._

.. N A..

. 7/2..

. 5G.

.. N A... 137

' OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTON REPORTS..........

......m.................... N A.,.,._, NA.,.... 71..-..

. 85..

aI...~ 139 -

OVERDUE AND EXTENDED' CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS..........

= NA..

.. NA.... 2/12.,

. 0/6..

,.D.

.141 CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIF CARS vs.

NRC VOLATONS ISSUED vs.

. LERs REPORTED........,

....................NA..

.. NA..

.. N A..

.. NA..

.. NA...142 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITONS........................

..............,,..........,...143 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX...

..,,,.........................................150 REPOF T DiSTRIBUTON LlsT............,,,,..........,................

........ 152

SUMMARY

SECTION POSITIVE TREND S R EPORT....,.....,...........................,

... =

153'

)

ADVE RSE TRE NDS R EPORT..

,,153 INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTON REPORT.,........

= = -,,...... 153 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES............,............................154 TABLE OF CONTENTS /

SUMMARY

TREND SYMBOLS A - ADVERSE TREND l - IMPROVED PERFORMANCE D - DECLINING PERFORMANCE NMA - NEEDS MANAGEMENT ATTENTON NA - NOT APPLICABLE

- INPO UPPER QUARTILE vi.

FOREWORD included in this report are performance indicator graphs for the years 1990 and 1989. These graphs are provided where appropriate comparisons can be made. In some instances, for example when the method of reporting an indicator has changed during 1991 or an indicator has been added to the report, the graphs for previous years are not included.

1 l

D Net Generation 50-40-33 26 33 64 33.75 32.33

~

o q

y gq g

yhht;,jyj pj% QQ

?~

t

,gg 30.9

@ 30-

}g Q

f

~

k dh 22.8

} :h k:N N b

22.3 N, r.,

kk,,

8 20-41 17.54 mm

~n s

e n.a-my

..j%

qfW s3 o

n

(%m,d, d

i er '

11.61

.?

$e@

s plQj y

4k; Afj 3$y jg.q}

m ik py r a

p a

.. p em 5

s n

10- Q kk (d[.,

/

I I,

hM r%[f) kg g's t 4Nd h

d"lg M"d

4A C

I jAgd

gy

$g,[ (g J

y'N kWD F

P 4;@j d3 @b

@l $g k$j $:A{$g%g gy$5?

y yTe Myg g 9 1

j$,Qi(iyf j

1 O

i i

i Jan89 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec89 1989 50-D Net Generation 40-a5.1 34.55 T

M,s 31.27 e

se %v v

y y

g&g o 30-7 28.03 A

I

.3 26.89 27.26

'y "y

mm

+

~

V~

hhg 24.15 7

F g!ge g

g i

3

yt I

o 20- Lx r

d L'

17.64 1 a i

r L

16.3m-4 I

c n

rg e

$,ew4 J

nse J. m QW I

w

@u a

e l

l l

)

N Mn$

Y Wy,'

2 lj w.

6%Q

. d' :P Wi p

y hs%.

ay, y$fg]

it 10-e

k n

g[p]

+4 j

>G S

i y @pJ p

g g

Mg; qpi

gn m3 sy i.. 3 em s-43 m,i gjNe my bgp g[E).

g O

^-N.

- we

$g[

9k[I g @3 h?h$ Mf6 s

dh M kEl d

o 0

0 47 i

i i

i Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec90 1990 2

(j Net Generation (10,000 Mw hours) 50q l

40-88AI u si 3 sos sus 27'9 26 M 0-i i

i i

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 l

STATION NE1 GENERATION This indicator shows the net generation of the Fort Calhoun Station for the reporting month.

I During the month of December 1991, a net total of 361,688 MWH was generated by the Fort Calhoun Station. The low net generation for the months of September and October is due to the following three forced outages: 1) the station batteries replacement outage from 9/12/91 at 2100 riours through 10/6/91 at 1114 hours0.0129 days 0.309 hours 0.00184 weeks 4.23877e-4 months ; 2) a steam leak on the drain line from a turbine control valve was repaired from 10/18/91 at 0307 hours0.00355 days 0.0853 hours 5.076058e-4 weeks 1.168135e-4 months to 10/19/91 at 1116 hours0.0129 days 0.31 hours 0.00185 weeks 4.24638e-4 months ; and 3) a steam leak repair on a test pipe on the high pressure turbine shell from 10/25/91 at 2204 to 10i 6/91 at 0810.

Data Source: Station Generation '. aport l

Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trond: None 3

i

1 20%-

Forced Outage Rate

-O-Fol1Cathoun Goni(2.4%)

15%-

--C}-

Industry Upper 10 Percontilo (0.25%)

1( t'n-5%-

C O-0 0

0 0

0 O

O

^

C C

(

[0

~

0%

O O

O O---

m m

Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1989 20%-

l l

Forced Outage Rate

- O-Fort Calhoun Goal (2.4%)

15%-

.-O Industry Upper 10 Percentile (0.25%)

10k

'5%-

C O

O O

O O-

+

m D

0%

Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug' Sep Oct Nov Dec90 l-1990 l

l

. 4:

w-

...a.--.--mv.4--*-,-

-gwe-w6.re-g--yep--+9

..v.wy w--4=pwe,--e--

3wW,,.,w-

,m,-p,,ee-u,.-.Tv--

_ ym3Wtmw-w=3 y~W-^-'==wryye-y g

b-w F--Y

= -.- - _. _

Forced Outago Rate

+ Fort Calhoun Goal (2.4%)

@ Industry Upper 10 Percentilo (0.25%)

GOOD 15%-

t 9.7 10%-

E fM vo M

5%-

/<

{

C O

O M

O O-O O

O O

O 1.4 0

N N

N-

, 0%

O

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 91 FORCED OUTAGE R ATE The forced outage rate was reported as 9.28% for the time period from 1/1/91 to 12/31/

91.

A forced outage occurred during the months of September and October 1991 when the station batteries were declared inoperable. The generator was taken off line on 9/12/91 and remained off line until 10/6 /91.

f Tha generator was taken off line on October 18 & 19 due to a steam leak on a turbine control valve before seat drain line. The generator was again taken off line on October 25 & 26 due to a steam leak from an instrument tap on the high pressure turbino.

A forced outage occurred during the month of August 1991 to replace failed potential trar.sformers (pts). These pts convert 345 KV to 120V for use in the breaker synchro-nization circuit.

l The 1991 Fort Calhoun Goal for this indicator is 2.4%.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & NERC GAD Forms Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 5

-- G - Fort Calhoun Goal

-O-Industry Upper Quartile 3-O FCS Reactor Scrams 2-D D

0 0- --O O

O 1-C O

O O

m O

i i

Jan87 Feb Mar Apr Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec87 1987

--G-Fort Calhoun Goal 3 -'

-O-Industry Upper 10 Percentile 2-O FCS Reactor Scrams 1-0 0

O

=O O

O O

O 0-O O

O O

O Oi O

i w

i i

Jan88 Feb Mar Apr Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec88 1988

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 3-

-D-Industry Upper 10 Percantile 2-O FCS Reactor Scrams 1-C O

O O

O 0 --

O O

C-i i

i i

i Jan89 Feb Mar Apr.

Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989

-G-Fort Calhoun Goal

--O-Industry Upper 10 Percentile 3-FCS Reactor Scrams 2-1-

C O

O O

Ci i

i i

i Jan90 Feb Mar Apr Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 6

.. ~

- - -.. -. - - - - - -. ~.-.. - -

3-i

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 1 1995INPOIndustryGoal i Industry Upper 10 Percentile 2-0 FCS ReactorScrams i

1-A

.A A

A A

A 0000 0-O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O-O, i

i i

i

'87 '88'89'90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug' Sep Oct Nov Dec91

+

UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL There were no unplanned automatic reactor scrams in December 1991. The last unplanned automatic reactor scram occurred on July 2,1986.

The 1991 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams while critical hn been set at zero. The 1995 INPO lndustry goalls one per 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months critical.

The industry upper ten percentile value is zero scrams per unit on an annual basis. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants in this area.

l Data Source: Monthly Operatlons Report & Plant Licenseo Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Pattcrson L

Adverse Trend:- None 7

~

I m

,c

,.w.,-..

,,._-.,..<-..-,-..-,--,.~r,

_.,_,--.,,c.,_~m.,m,,

3-E Safety System Actuations

-- O - Fort Calhoun Goal 2-

-O-Industry Upper 10 Percontile 1-0 - --O

, B O

O

,G O

O O

0 T--09 i

Jant9 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec09 1989 3-E Safety System Actuations

--G-Fort Calhoun Goal O

Industry Upper 10 Percentile 2-1-

0-T-O-T--U-T--B-- r--G r--B-r--U-T-B-r-O r-B T--87 Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 8

m

3-E Safety System Actuations Fort Calhoun Goal C

Industry Upper 10 Percontilo 2-GOOD l

V 1

1_

0 0 0-O O

O,O O

O O

O= r-C Oj i

i i

'88'89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -(INPO DEFINITION)

There were no unplanned safety system cctuations during the month of December 1991.

The 1991 goal for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is zero.

The industry upper ten percentile w lue for the number of unplanned safety system actuations per year is zero. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants for this indicator.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Jaworski/Foley/Ronning Adverse Trend: None 9

=

This page intentionally left blank.

3 f

h r

k 10 a.-

m.

w

.-w-.,-,,

-.-wg.

,me

--W---

,'wy-gy,w,--y-

-.w 9-4-y.,g 9.gy.-.g3 p,ypg

.y.9-%--

.gg93mm g

g.L u

v

- 12 Month Running Total SSA 0-

-1000

--o-CnticalHours

-900 O Safety System Actuations (SSA) 8-

-800 g

-700 2

-600 $

b. 6-V 2

s 7

g

-500 -

h 4-li

-400 g

?

8;

.-300

.:4 2-

,m

-200 h

h s

-100 h

[

g 1

0 0

-0 i

i ii s v

'88'89'90 JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND 1990 1991 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -(NRC DEFINITION)

This indicator shows the number of unplanned safety system actuations (SSAs) which include the High and Low Pressure Safety injection Systems, the Safety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classification of SSAs in-cludes actuations when major equipment is operated and when the logic systems for these safety systems are challenged.

The last event of this type occurred in June 1991 when there were two anticipatory signal starts for DG 2. T he first start occurred after a control relay was bumped causing a momentory loss of power to safety bus 1 A4. DG 2 started a second time wnen a breaker trip r:ccurred during DG 1 breaker synchronization. DG 2 was not required to provide power to the safety bus in either of these situations.

The majority of SSAs displayed above were related to 1990 Refueling Outage activities and are currently being reviewed under the Safety System Actuation Reduction Pro-gram The goal of the Program is to reduce the nurnber of SSAs at Fort Calhoun. The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a maximum of five.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Jaworski/Foley/Ronning Adverse Trend: None i

11 l

l

_ = _ - _ -. _ _ _ _ _. - -.

13-E Q

Monibly Gross Heat Rate k

2

-A-Year to Date Gross Heat Rato 5 12-

-O-Fort Calhoun 1989 Year Erd Goal ustry Upper 10 PercentHe 11-g i

i i

l I

i I

.I i.

I i

1 Jan89 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 89 1989 3

Monthly Gross Heat Rate

-A-Year to Dato Gross Heat Rato

-O-Fort Calhoun 1990 Year End Goal

-C}- Industry Upper 10 Percontilo I

g a e

g12-l s

~h h

h, h-M-Q

~

A b

b 10-

,p

_-C M.Q f

i Oh E%A i

b; L.

EN !9 Dl

.9 u

9=

1 i

i i

l Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1

1990 12 i

5 Month'y Gross Heat Rate

-k-Year to Dato Gross Heat Rate Ib

--G-Fort Calhoun 1991 Year End Goal Industry Upper 10 Percontile h12-GOOD 11-10270 10520 10304 g

'88

'89

'90 Jan91 Feb 1r Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 GROSS HEAT RATE This indicator shows the Gross Heat Rate (GHR) for the reporting month, the previous 1991 months, the year to-date value, and the year end GHR for the previous 3 year The gross heat rate for the Fort Calhoun Station was reported as 10,023 BTU /KWH during the month of December.

The year to-date gross heat rate was reported as 10,300 BTU /KWH.

The above year end Fort Calhoun goal (10,250 BTU /KWH)is the theorehcal best gross heat rate that can be achieved by the Fort Calhoun Station during 1991.

The gross heat rate industry upper ten percentile value is 9,935 BTU /dWH.

Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

(

Accountability: Jaworski/Popek l

Adverse Trends: None 13

O Monthly EAF Year.to-Date EAF

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal

-O-Industry Upper 10 Percentilo 100% -

O D-O 80%-

b h-h D O

O O

O

~

/

p 60%-

/

40%-

20%-

E 0%--

Jan89 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989 O

Monthly EAF Year to Date EAF

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal

-O-Industry Upper 10 Porcentile 100 % -

C O

O O

O - -O N

V 80%-

O C

C C

U C

E [

C C

(~~~

c.

60%-

40%-

/

20%-

0%

O i

e i

i y

i i

-- i Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 14

..-..__ -_.~

- _- _~

C Monthly EAF Year to Date E AF

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal GOOD

-o-Industry Upper 10 Percontile 100 % -

o-Dhward l

D o-f o

o-o 80% _

y oc

o.. o o

_ o o

o o

o _o_o_ o o

j

$6.6 00%-

1 40% -

20% -

i i

iO%

'88

'89

'00 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF), the year to-date EAF for 1991, and the EAF for the previous 3 years.

The EAF was reported as 100% for the month of December 1991. The EAF values for September and October are low due to a forced outage that occurred from 9/12/91 to 10/6/91 when the station batteries were declared inoperable. Also during October:

power was reduced from 100% to 10% from 10/18/91 to 10/19/91 due to a steam leak on a turbine control valve before seat drain line; and power was reduced from 100% to 10% from 10/25/91 to 10/26/91 due to a steam leak from an instrument tap on the high pressure turbine. The EAF was not affected by the 70% power reduction during Febru-ary, since the reduction was under management control and for reasons of economy (fuel savings).

The year to-date EAF was repor1ed as 84.3%

The EAF Fort Calhoun goalis 69% for 1991.

The EAF industry upper ten percentile value is 82.5%

Data Source: Dietz/Parra (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 15

1 t

This page intentionally left blank. The UCP indicator did not exist prior to 1991.

k r

4 i

16

- 18

,,._...,_,-..m_.._

m.

["j Monthly Unit Capabilty Far.tur

--A-1M5 b'PO Indu3try Goat

.- O - Fort Calhoun Goal

-O-Fort Ca:houn Station Three Year Averale UCF

-@4 Industry MoSan (Three Year Avera06 7

m

~S q

m E

Y d

O W- -o.

O-- O

-O O

, -O.4 c

O Bob A--f p

g-h

@ny h,y

j e

d- -

8 6

4,j-94 3-rA 9

o R

9-0

+

$ p.

s p) a -._o_o_g q

po g,,

[f O

b

!,hf

- h, yh

.y j'

W i

d h

M' ;'

M j:(

4p ii) p'

F

(

l id.,

k, h f;f'f [@

]y h 3[

k;W [4 3,0 gi a

- ~

M 4

gi

-d q[

w..J,- N.t._ _ %___

$p g$

{p g

g g;ggg g g g

g%

20% g

%> 7 _.4?

W J

,. G_.,

t Jan91 Feb M ',r apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecG1 UNIT CAPABILE.'Y FACTOR

\\

Th:s indicator shows the plent monthly Unit Capability (UOF) Factor, the Fort Ca!houn UCF goal for 1991, and tite 1995 !NPO industry goal.

The UCF was reported as 100% %r the i.tonth of December 1991. The UCF mlues for the mnnths of September and Octaber ere low due to a forced outage that occurred from 9/12/91 to 10/6/91 when the stat:un batteries were declared inoperatli' Also during Octoolr: power was reduceo from 100% to 10%.from 10/18/91 to 10/19/91 due to a cteam leak on a turbine control valve before seat drain line: and power was re-duced from 100% to 10% f*om 10/E5/91 to 10/26/S1 due to a steam leak from an instru-ment tap an the high pressure turbino. The UCF was not affected by the 70% power reduct'on caring February, since the reduction was under management control and for reasons of eaonomy (fuel savings).

The UCF goal for Fort Cathoun for 1991 ic 90% The 1995 INPO industry goal of 80%

and the industry median value of 73.3% (three year average) has been provided by INPO in their 1991 Midyear Report.

Data Source: Generation Totals Reports & Monthly Operating Repyt Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 17 1

a 4

6-Fuel Reliability Indicator i

Fd

--e--

Fort Calhoun Goal 3

l G--

Industry Upper 10 Percentile 4-z 2 --

C

-O

-1 O

O O

O v

m F

O JanB9 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989 (Rovised to includo INPO Doncity Correction Factor) 6-Fuel Reliability Ind' itor c

- O -- Fort Calhoun Goal g

9

-+3 - Industry Uppet 10 Percentile S

z C

O O

- L O

f,O O

O O

O O-O Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun-Jcl Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 (Revised to includo INPO Density Correction Factor) 6-Fuel Reliability indicator

--O--

Industry Median Value

- 1995 INPO Industry Goal V

4_

!Ez

\\

- 2.4 g_

1.5' 1.5 C

O O

N 0

0 O

O O

O y

A A

-A A

A A

q o-

'88 - '89

'90 -

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 1991 18 g-w a-wW-e

-w---av

=.,-oy-&

vFre-am s

e "we 'v

ee

-wwN-e-e-+tew-w*we<m-Mbea ye4wn-b-

'%---*wwry-rvw y-wew+-+

"-mer&

wr-W 'WW--mv=

~.7_ _ _ _ _.

i FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) was reported as 3.66 nanocurios/ gram for the month of Decorr.bor 1991. The Docomber FRI was calculated using the data from December 1 through

31. The f 'nt was at a steady state operation of approximately 100% power Jul VJ this time.

The INPO definition of steady stato power has been changed to *at least thrte days' at a power level that does not vary more than + or - 5 percent. This change has been loflecteu in the

Definitions

section of this report.

The small variations soon in the FRt for 1991 can be explained by reviewing t1e changes in power lovels the plant experienced throughout the year. There have been tu obsatvaolo lodine spiles which would bo indicative of fuel failure during cycle 13.

The plant was shut down in the latter part of December 1990 foi repairs av did not retum to 100'.1, power until 1/15/91. On 2/15/91 power was reduced to 70%. nt this level was r.1Mrt-tainoj unto 4/23/91 with sorte power manouvering in too latter part of too rr ant Power Isvols decreased to a low of 35% on 4/26/91. Tha decreasir,g FRI value till wed vio ' ; wor radntion durirg the first four months of 1991.

From S/f through 6/15/91 the pewsr level was steady at 75 6. Power (Netu ith is occurred from 6/16/9'. through 6/22/91. Because the 99% power level for W remainder of June did not moot be iNPO definition of steady state operation that Fort Calhoud Station was using at that time (see change of definition exp'ained abovo), the data for that ) days was not lsed. This mar $o the June FRI value artificially low.

7/1 through 8/1/91 was steady at 100% power. Powt r w;.s tan redu. td to 95% for al powel MTC testing. A retum to 100% occurred on 8/6/91. 8/12 through 8/18 the pin 't experienced a power reducilute to 30% to replace a failing switchyard transformr f.100% pcwer levels woro maintained for the romainder of the month and ccatinued until 9/.1/91. Both the frequent pov;or maneuvering and the high powor operation contribute to the higuar fRis for July Aiyust and September.

The plant was shut down from 9/12/91 through 10/5/91 fdlo. 'ed by a ramp up to 100% power completed on 10/17/91. Frequent power oscillations ocTrred through the rotencer of October

. These power changes create a small number of days that meet the lh'PO ct.ena for steady stato operation. Only the data from 10/12 through 10/17/91 wLs usod in t 10 Fhl calculation.

The low FRI value for October reflects the small data base plus 1110 plant being shut down or at low power operation levels for he provhus 26 days.

November and December opor ition was steedy at 10u% power. 'Tha FRt increased to values seen earlier this cycle with the plant at 100% power nporation.

Data Source: Holthats/Guliani Accountability: Patforson: Spilker Adverso Trond: None 19

l j

Personnel Cumulative Radiat*on Exposure 400-(Man Rem)

-O-Fort Calhoun Annua! Goal (75 Man Rom) 300~

-D-Industry Upper 10 Percentile (106 Man Rem)

O O

200-0 0

0 0

O O

4_ & mg 100-

p. --Oy 0

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 Personnel Cumulative Radiation Exposure (Man-Rem)

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal

--D-Industry Upper 10 Percentile 300 -

g O

F

/

n p.

a 200-D 0

D

-O O

O O

O

-O O

O O

100 -

0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 l

20

1 Personnel Cumulative Radiation Exposure (Man Rom)

-o-Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (75 Man Rom) 400- 1995 INPO Industry Goat (105 Man Rem)

-C}--

Industry Uppor 10 Percontilo (100 Man. Rem)

M GOOD Id

';?

'.,,);

V q

203 -

,3 4

6 6---6 A

6 A

or---6 A-6 A

en

., y D

D-O-O-O-O-O--O---O-O--O-O f

? l

) M 100 ~

gg g

3 m

m m

m

~

,s s

y

~

o

'80

'89

'oO Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul AuD Sep Oct Nov Doc PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)

During December 1991,3.44 man tem was recorded by TLDs worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station. The yeat to dato exposure is 51.9 man rom.

The Fort Calhoun goal for personnoi radiation exposure (cumulativo) during 1991 is 75 man rom. The 1995 INPO Industry goalis 185 man rom.

The personnel radiation exposure industry upper ton percontile is 100 man rom por unit per year.

Data Sourco: Patterson/ Williams (Manager /Sourco)

Accountability: Pattorson/Lovett Positivo Trend SEP54 l

21 L

r This page intentionally left blank, P

F 4

o

.~

D Cumulative Radioactive Oil Sont For Processing (in gallons)

O Cumulative Dry Active Wasto Sont For Processing (in cubic toet) 12000~

000o-m E

E E

E

~

0-i i

i i

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 01 Cumulativo Radioactivo Waste Dunod

-C>-

Fort Calhoun Goal For Wasto Dunod (4soo) 1996 INPO Industry Goal (3804)

-O-Industry Uppet t o Percontile Waste Durund (3072)

O Radioactivo Waste Dutied Th6s Month (in cubic feet) 600o-

l

[ b_ _d 4

E E

4 bN k

k k

b o

1500-

'89

'90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 91 Yont end Total VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID HADIOACTIVE WASTE The upper graph shows the volume of radioactive oil and dry radioactive waste sent for processing. The lower graph shows the volume of the monthly, the cumulative annual total, and the year end total of radioactive waste buried the previous 2 years.

The monthly and cumulative volumes of radioactive waste which were buried during the month of Cacember 1991 have been revised. These revisions are due to the delay involved in the shipping for processing, thu processing, and the burying of radioactive waste.

Cumutmive volume of radioactive oil shipped off site for processing (gallons) 4,330.0 Cumulative amount of solid radwaete shipped off site for processing (cubic feet) 12.898.0 Volumo of solid radioactive wast', which was buried dunng the month of December (cubic f eet)120.3 Cumulative volume of solid radioactive waste buried (cubic feet) 1,120.7 Amount of sokd radioactwe waste in temporary storage (cubic feet) 0.0 i

The For1 Calhoun goal for the volume of solid radioactive waste which has been buried is 4,500 cubic feet. The 1995 INPO Industry goalis 110 cubic meters per year.

The industry upper ten percentile value is 3,072 cubic feet per unit per year. The For1 Calhoun Station was in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986,1987, and 1988.

l-Data Source: Patterson/Breuer (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Patterson/Bilau Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 23

t

?

1.6 1990 Disabling injury / illness Frequency Rate

--M--

1989 Disabling injury / Illness Frequency Rato i

14*

-o-5 Year Average Disabling injury / illness Frequency Rate

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal s

1.2 -

Industry Upper 10 Percentile 1-0.8 -

oAs u

0.4-g c

% 0.23 0.21 o,a o.2 -

O.2 -

g, o

o-o o

o o

o-0-

M

~

Dec' i

i i

_i i

i i

i. - -i

'Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun-Jul _

Aug Sep Oct Nov --

1990-L l

l --

t l

l 24 -

l :-

E

--,.._---.1-

_1, T

1991 Disabling injury /fliness Frequency Rate

--M--

1990 Disabling injury /lilness Frequency Rate g,,

-H>--

S Year Average Disabling injury / illness Frequency Rate 1.4 -

--O-Fort Calhoun Goat GOOD 1.2 -

. 1995 INPO Industry Goal V

1-D Industry Upper 10 Percentile 0.8 -

0.6 -

0.56 0.57 A

A A

'-0 SV A - N 0A0 -0A4 0.4 -

0.3P b2 T

3 0

/

C 0.2 -

0 -- b i-bi f

o i

i i

i

')

Jan Fu.>

Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

This indicator shows the reporting month disabling injury / illness rate in column form.

The 1990 disabling injury / illness frequency rate and the 5 year average (from 1986 through 1990) of the corresponding monthly disabling injury / illness frequency rate are also shown.

i There were _no (zero) lost time accidents reported at the Fort Calhoun Station in Decem-ber. The total number of lost me accidents that have been reported during 1991 is two.

The 1991 disabling injury / illness frequency rate goal was set at 0.31. The 1995 INPO

- Industry goal is 0.50.-

The industry upper ten percentile disablin0 njury/ illness frequency rate is 0.

i yfjg Year End Rate

-.1988 1.6 1989 0.4 1990 0.5 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Richard Adverse Trend: None SEP 25 & 26 25 -

i T

This page intentionally left blank.

i L

t

?

4 3

Thermal Output

--C>-

Fort Calhoun 1495 MW Goal i

j

- Tech Spec 1500 MW Limit 1500-r-=-=-

-=:ese;ese=eg ge;e=e m op =eg,eparese=exe=oreve=

e 1490-o i

k 41480-1 e

g

$1470-8 1460 -

i 1450-. -

r 1

3.

5 7

9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The above thermal output graph displays the dally operating power level during Decem-ber 1991, the 1500 thermal megawatt average technical specification limit, and the 1495 l

thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal.

Power level will decline to approximately 80% during January 1992 with End of Life power rundown, Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Trausch Adverse Trend: None 1

_________~____.__.___________._________.,___._,___________._1._a-

'2-Equipment Forced Outago Rate 1.6 -

1.4 -

1.2 - 0.8 -

4 I

0.6 -

0.4 -

- 0.2 -

f

~

0 Jan89= Feb Mar Apr May-Jun_

Jul.

Aug-Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989

)

t 1

4 2

i 1.8 -

Equipment Forced Outage Rate

==-

t 1.6 -

i 1.4 -

i l

1.2 -

1-0.8 -

0.6 -

0.4 -

O.2 --

0 Jan90.Feb Mar f.pr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec00 1990 M

4

-,s c-v r,.-e--,,-..,,

,.->.-,rc-

-,e+r.,

y,4 s -

rQ t-,w-,,w,-m-,-wew

~,m w

a

- wew,w w-w-r

w'-,"-s-

----*-+r

=e

w e'&'+--

w w w w -- vvves

2-

Equipment Forced Outage Rato 1.8 -

1.U -

1.4 -

1.2 GOOD 1

~

V 0.8 -

0.53 0.6 -

0.4 -

0.13 l

o.2 -

0' [f) i 1'

i l

'88, '89 - 90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec01 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS The equipment forced outage rate for the twelve month period from 1/1/91 through 12/

31/91 is 0.50.

An equipment forced outage due to the station batteries being declared inoperable began in Septembe, and was carried into October. In addition, two forced outages occurred during the month of October: on 10/18/91 the generator was taken off line due to a steam leak on a turbine control valve before seat drain line; on 10/25/91 the gen-erator was taken off line due to a steam leak from an instrument tap on the high pres-sure turbine.

One equipment forced outage occurred during the month of August 1991, The outage was required to replace failed potential transformers (pts). These pts convert 345 KV to 120 V for use in the breaker synchronization circuit.-

L l One equipment forced outage occurred in the month of January 1991 due to the De-

. cember CEDM housing leak which carried outage time into January,

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs) l L

.-- Accountability: Patterson/ Jaworski Adverse Trend: None s

1 l

l

l 120-Operations 1990 Budget ($Milkon) e-l 100-1990 Cumulative Total ($ Mil 6on)

--+-

80-60 -

/

40-20 -

0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 40-

- Maintenance 1990 Budget ($ Miluon) _

--+-- 1990 Cumulative Total ($ MilEon) 30-

20-10-O' i

Jan Feb-_

Mar - Apr

- May Jun

_ Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 m.

.m

--,,,.-,._~,.m.__.,___

Operatons 1991 Budget ($ Million) 1991 Cumulative Total ($ Milton) 80-Q 1991 Revised Budget 60-40-

_y N

20-

??'

'^

0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun vl Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

~

Maintenance 1991 Budget ($ M11/on) 20-1991 Cumulative Total ($ Milhon) 15-8 1991 Revised Budget 10-5-

i

=-

0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The Operations and MairCance Budget Indicator shows the budget yeai-to-date as wesi as the actual expen"'t-for operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station.

The December bar graph represents the revised year end budget due to budget revi-sions primarily reflecting the refueling postponement for Cycle '3.

The budget year-to-date for Operations was 70.5 million ontlars for December while the acWI cumulative expenditures through December totaled 56.4 million dollars. The revced year-end budget for Operations was 56.5 million dollars.

The budget year-to-date for Maintenance was 24.3 million dollars for December while the actual cumulative expenditures through December totaled 8.1 million dollars. The revised year-end budget for Maintenance was 12.7 million dollars.

Data Source: GMason/ Parent (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Scofield Adverse Trend: None 31

l

-1000-

--+- Documents Scheduled for Review 800-l Documents Reviewed

--V-Overdue Documents 600 -

400-200-0

~ 'I I

Jan89 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989 Documents Scheduled fon Review l

Documents Reviewed

-V-Overdue Documents

-1400-1200-1000-

-800-600-400-h

-Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May - Jun

.;l Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 199J 32 l.

- _ ~. -... _ _ _... _...... _ _

1000-Documents Scheduled for Review l

Documents Reviewed 800-

--V--

Overdue Documents l

6o0-i.

t 400-

-200-h o

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 DOCUMENT REVIEW

- This indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month._.These -

. document reviews are performed _in house and include Special Procedures, the Site i Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual.

During December there were 50 document reviews completed while 42 document reviews were scheduled. At the end of December, there were 40 document reviews overdue; Most of the overdue documents were from the chemistry and secondary chemistry group.

During the month of December there were 18 new or renamed documents reviewed.

These new or renamed documents will need to be reviewed again in 1993.

i-h The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is zero overdue documents.

. Data Source:- Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None SEP 46 m

L L

L

..... ~ - - -.

M Numberof Failures /20 Demards Trigger Values for 20 Demands Numberof Failures /50 Demands

--V-Tri'ger Values for 50 Demands B

Numberof Faliures/100 Demands

- - Trigger Values for 100 Demands 8-6-

Y Y

Y 4

4 4

4 3

m g1_2 l

2 2

2-g=

E 0

0 l

Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 l

I l

l l

3%

O Number of Failures /20 Demands

- Trigger Values for 20 Demands O

Number of Fallures/50 Demands.

-V-Trigger Values for 50 Demands Trigger Values for 100 Demands D

Number of Failures /100 Demands 8-GOOD 6-V T

T Y

Y

--Y Y

Y Y

4 w

t 4

4 4

4-e 3

3 3

3 i

g 7

e M

l

~

- a p

y m

2 1

2 8 2

1

'2 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 e

2-y

- t 7-7 7-7-

c 7-h f

f d

k p

11 h

U

[

p s

3

.1 d

0 e

t

%" 9 i

[

j ff j

3 4

0 0

9 0

0 -0 0

p I

I 3.

I I

i i

I I

i Jan91 Feb-Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY This bar graph shows three monthly indicators pertaining to the number of failures that were reported during the last 20,50, and 100 emergency diesel generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also shown dre trigger values which correspond to a high level of confidence that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when the failure values are below the corresponding trigger val-ues. These trigger values are the Fort Calhoun 1991 goal.

The demands counted for this indicator include the respective number of starts and the respective number of load-runs for both Diesel Generators combined. The number of start demands includes all valid and inadvertent starts, including all start-only demands and all start demands that are followed by load-run demands, whether by automatic or manualinitiation. Load run demands must follow successful starts and meet at least one of the following criteria: a load-run that is a result of a realload signal, a load-run-test expected to carry the plant's load and duration as stated in the test specifications, and a special test in which a diesel generator was expected to be operated for a mini-mum of one hour and to be loader.: with at least 50% of design load (see exceptions and '

other demand criteria in the Definition Section).

The demand failure which occurred during the month of August for DG-2 was due to a seal failure on the Jacket water pump.

L Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Jaworski/Ronning Adverse Trend: None 35

O. DG-1 Failures /25 Demands

.E DG-2 Falktres/25 Demands S-O Failure Trigger Value for 25 Demands / Fort Calhoun Goal 4-C O

O O

3-2 2

2 2

2 1-OO 0~ 0 00 00 00 00 0 -

0 0 -

0 '.

-0 0

0 ---

i i

Jan91 Feb Mar -.

Apr May Jun.

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS) lThis indicator shows the number of failures experienced by each emergeiicy diesel generator during the last 25 start demands and the last 25 load-run demands. A trigger value of 4 failures within the last 25 demands is also shown. This trigger value of 4 failures within' 25 demands is the Fort Calhoun goal for 1991.

It must be emphasized that in accordance with NUMARC criteria, certain actions will take place in the event that any one emergency diesel generator experiences 4 or more failures within the last 25 demands on the unit. These actions are described in the Definition Section._ A Standing Order has been drafted for the Fort Calhoun Station to institutionalize and formally approve / adopt the required NUMARC actions.

Diesel Generator DG-1 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 demands on the unit.

' Diesel Generator DG-2 has experienced two failures during the last 25 demands on the unit. An air dampar roll pin failure occurred in July 1991, and a seal failed on a jacket water pump in August 1991.

i Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Ronning

- Adverse Trend: Nons i

. as -

O Planned Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavailability Unplannad Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavailability G

Esttrnated Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavailability E

Planned Hours of Diesel Generator No.1 Unavails.Jity

--O-Unplanned Hours of Diesel Generator No.1 Unava6tability

200-1So-1 oo -

f So-m o-O g

iC

-O 1

O O

h Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 E

Cumulative Hours of DG.1 Unavallatwlity from 7/1/91 to e/31/91 Q

Cumulative Hours of DG.2 Unavallatulity from 7/1/91 to a/31/91 5

Estimated Hours of DG 2 Unava' lability from 7/1/91 to a/31/91 O

Cumulative Hours of DG.1 Unau aability from P/1/91 to 12/31/91 Cumulativa Hours of DO-2 UnevallatWilly from 9/1/91 to 12/31/91 200 -

Fort Calhoun Goal (43.a hours of unava6labi46ty per diesel generator) 150-100 -

f/

M r= 6 r= A r=6 50.-

V a FA..

Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Deco 1 DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY This indicator provides a monthly illustration of diesel generator unavailability for 1991. The top graph shows the diesel generator planned, unplanned, and estimated unavailable hours for DG-1 and DG 2 for each month. The lower graph shows the cumulative hours of unavailability for each diesel generator for two time periods: from July through August, and during September through November 1991.

Fort Calhoun met the goal of 43.8 unavailable hours per DG for the last four months of 1991. This goalis based on the 1990 INPO industry median value for diesel generator unavailable hours.

There were zero unavailable hours for DG-1 and DG-2 during the month of November.

i The 14.4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months of DG-1 unavailability and 18.3 hours3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months of DG-2 unavailability for the month of October were l

attributable to planned maintenance activities. The 2.7 estimated unavailable hours for DG-2 were due to l

a roll pin failure.

The 31.4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months of unplanned unavailability and the 161 hours0.00186 days 0.0447 hours 2.662037e-4 weeks 6.12605e-5 months of estimated unavailability for DG-2 in August were the result of two separate events. On August 7, during surveillance testing, DG-2 tailed to crank on the first attempt. On Augt.st 26 - 27, DG-2 was inoperable due to the f ailure of a jacket water pump seal.

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Ronning Positive Trend 37

l

@ October 1991 Outstanding MWOs O November 1991 Outstanding MWOs O December 1991 300-200 -

fN \\

s 4

100-

- ?

N >

ti Q$

b'$$

ff 5

M M

Ed

'~ "

E k ^I 0

i i

i 0 3 Months 3-6 Months 6-9 Months 9-12 Months

>12 Months AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the age of corrective non outage maintenance work orders (MWOs) remaining open at the end of the reporting month.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: None 3B

400-350-E October 1991 O November 1991 O December 1991 050-pp; 200-

//,

150-100-

"1 N fl!

E$$ p m,at %

Total Open MWOs-Open MWOs>3 Total Open Safety Open Safety Open High Priority months old Related MWOs Related MWOs >

MWOs 3 Months Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of corrective non outage MWOs remaining open at the end of the reporting month, along with a breakdown by several key categories.

The nu iber of open MWOs >3 months old is increasing because on-line activities must be scheduled beyond the end of the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 39

.... _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _. _. _.. _. _. ~... _.

- Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old C

Industry Upper Quartile 80%-

60% ~

/

C C

C C-O C

C C

.J C

C C

40%-

20%-

0%

Jan89 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul

-Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989

- Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old 80%-

-C Industry Upper Quartile 60%-

A

/

e C

C C

C

-C r-40%-

20%-

0%

Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul

.Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec00 1990-40 -

... g.. y _

l Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old 80%-

O Industry Upper Quartile GOOD Y

60%-

C C

O O

C C

C D

- 40%-

- 20%-

0%

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91

- CORRECTIVE MAINTEN ANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON-OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the percentage of open corrective non outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three morths old at the end of the reporting month; 4 The percentage of open corrective non outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three r9nths old at the end of December was reported as 32.3%

'The industry upper quartile valtse for corrective maintenance backlog greater than 3 m'onths old is 45.80 The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper Lquartile of nuclear power plants in this area, p

The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal for this_ indicator is a maximum of 45%

Data' Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accou'ntability: Patterson/ Bobba-Adverse Trend: None l

I.

l:

\\;

- 41 L

~.. -.

...... - ~. ~....

i Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance 90'e'. -

--D-Industry Upper Ouartile 80%-

70%-

60%-

^

M M

M w

w w

w-w w

w 50%-

C C

40%-

30%-

+

20 %

Jan89 -Feb Mar

- Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989 90%-

80%-

70*/. --

^

' 60% -

M M

w w

.a w

w w

50%-

40%-

30%-

20% -

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov' Dec-1990 42

.~

Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance

- ~

-O-Industry Upper Ouartile (57.7%)

A aNun Goal F.)

80%-

GOOD 70%-

Q' 60%-

Q'

^

' ^

^

U_

U U

U i.J l

W 50%-

40%-

s 30%-

20%

Jan91 --Feb

- Mar Apr May Jun

. Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91

-RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON-OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the ratio of completed non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non-outage maintenance.

The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 52.7% in December. The values for this indicator decreased during September and October 1991 due to a greator emphasis

. being placed on completion of MWO work (see p. 41 for the " Corrective Maintenance

- Back!cg Greater Than 3 Months Old" indicator) during the battery outage.

. The Fort Calhoun goalis to attain a ratio of preventive to total maintenance greater than 60%.

- The industry upper quartile value for the ratio of preventive to total maintenance is 57.7%.

. Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Data Sowce: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None' SEP 41 43

4%-

--dr - Preventive Maintenance items Overdue

-O-Industry Upper Quartile

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 3%-

0 0

O O

O-0 0

-C C

C C

---C C

+

1%-

0%

1 1

1 Jan89 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul J.ug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989 4%-

-er-Preventive Maintenance items Overdue 3%-

-O-Industry Upper Quartile

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 2%-

O.

Il C

C W-C O

O O

1%-

N 0%

1 Jan90 - Feb.

Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 4

i

.=

.-.... ~ _

.4%-

- de-Preventive Maintenance items Overdue

-O-Industry Upper Quartile M>-

Fort Calhoun Goal 3%-

GOOD 2%-

v C

O O

O O-O O

1%-

C O

O O

O 1

0%.

L L

L Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 -

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE lTEMS OVERDUE L

The purpose _of this indicatoris to monitor progress in the administration and execution l

- of preventive maintenance programs. A small percentage of pieventive maintenance -

items ov.erdue indicates a station commitment to the preventive maintenance program l

and an ability to plan, schedule, and perform preventive maintenance tasks as pro-

- grams require.

During December 1991,1,257 PM items were completed. 2 PM items (0.16% of the

total 1,257) were not completed within the allowable grace period.

The percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue was higher in November -

. because of a scheduling problem resulting in a delay in completing PM task paperwork.

The Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 1.0% preventive maiatenance items over-due. The industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items overdue is 1.2%.

The Fort Calhoun Station is currently periorming in the industry upper quartile for this indicator.

Data Source: Patterson/ Linden (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 41 45

-.. _ _. - - - - - - - -.. -.. ~.

O Total Control Room Instruments Out-of Service

--O-Industry '.:pper Quartile For Total Outef Service Instruments-

-O - Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out-of-Service Instruments 40-30-T I

f

-.'j 'y #

R4 20 -

~

$k TE hk

'E i

d-R

$l ys n

p o

m an y

8 pf iS F

e N

~""

10 -

m.-

^

g gg 4

i

,_w, gg c ~ t-pn sq 4' r-

>! o

@wo-4 4.

m l

y m

m w

a

+s m

u,-

7 w

.s, m-x

+

gy m

m w

a s

1 i

4..

I L

6 '

I t

i i

4 1-d Jan89 Feb=. Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89-1989 3

5 I

j Total Control lkoom instruments Out-of Service

]

50)_

a

--G lt:dustry Upper Quartile For Total Out of Service Instruments j

0-

- O- - Fort Calhoun Goa? F-

'otal Out-of Service nstruments l

!. 30 -

gh k

~

%p Lyy

,g$.

d h?

k n

s e.

hy;.

m Sf0-20-

-l=

a f;n e

lk v

"x 8e ie.

&"?

?[#

va 2 s 1

kv-

{$E C'

lL i gls wu vg W

by 3p

f. 4 w

c '.y h:_,

.g y.

+4 g.

g3 g-g w

sf isW T.-

W>

v,:%

Y m

V@'Eh :RT

's 4.t /

31 3 Ei M

i,

.s.. $

--=

~ 10 -

AFl

% *1

%~

x -i.

. "s

^:

?w:

O-C ic

=

o.-,o,2:g o

c o

o o_o_o o

28

$$r iT'T.

hr M

F E,>

D.

e A

fw m

m e

m.:

s=--

d5 6%

6 th M

s.

2 0

i i

i 4-

_ i

_i

<Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May

.lun Jul Aug Sep Oct '

Nov. - Dec00 -

1990 4.i

-.2.-

. __~

M Number of C. R. Instruments Repairable On-Line 50-

[_]

Total Contiol Room lastruments Ouvef-Service

-O-hdustry tipper Quartilo For Total Out of Service Instruments

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out-of-Service Instruments 40-J 30-l a

c 7

y l

VO --

R T6) f,,

~

f F

(+

o

,l o

c

.c_

o L'g j

l Lj 10-

. y

[

j z

pg_:

1 4 -

g_a ;

rj L :

q_o_o_c

.,i

?,

5 h,h,h e

0_

i i

Jar'91 Feti Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 NUMBER OF OUT OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS This indicator shaws the number of out-of service control room instruments, the number of instruments repairable during plant operations (on line), the industry upper quartile for this indicator, and the Fort Calhoun goal.

There was a total of 20 out of service control room instruments at the end of December.

A plant outage is required to repair 5 of these 20 control room instruments.

The Fort Calhoun goalis to have sss than 15 out-of-service control room instruments.

The industry upper quartile value for the number of out-of-service control room instru-ments is 7.

[

Data Source: Patterson/Spilker(Manager / Source) l l

V: countability: Patterson/ Bobba 1

Adverse Trend: None 47 l

t 80%-

Jl Maintenance Overtime w

70%-

1 X

12 Month Average 3

I 1

60%-

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal for Non Outage 9,unhs I 4

w_!

J 50%-

1 f-i 40%-

[.

gi O

O O

C 0-O~-O W--O 30%-

.g y

20%-

_x

.% -_ _y _=4 n

,s

,s 10%-

'[

\\_ /

0%

-~

--~-~-

Jan89 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov L%'S2 1989

$9 80%-

70%-

- Maintenance Overtime X

12 Month Average

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal for Non-Outage Months 50%-

40% -

30%-

O O

X X

20%-

s, w_

X X

X m

/

10% -

0%

Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 48

bo b r%,5 Mainterance Overtime 70W

- t 92 Monh Average GOOD 4

-O-Fort Cnoun Goal for Non Outago Months 60% -s 60> S

w-6,

.g 40 p eb&

[.N.

tria!

305 -

>~D~S

-C Q ~~C C

C C

O C

O 20 0 Nb tr W

"%y w

u a

u

--X s

y-n n

c._

Jan91 Feb Mar fy May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The Meintonknce Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired mainte-aance Etivities with the allotted resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient Snodrce allocation and can load to errors due to fatigue.

The percent of overtime hours with recpect to aormal hours was reported as 12.1%

during the month of December 1991. Overtime in December exceeded 10% due to emergent work and outage preparation. The 12 month average percentage of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 8.0%.

The Fort Calhoun goal for the percentage of maintenance overtime hours worked has been set at 25% for non-outage months and 50% for outage months.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: None 49

_ _.j.7

- -. _. _. _.. _ - ~. _. - _

b

~

O Open irs Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance) e Closed irs Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance)

Procedural Noncomplihnee irs (Maintenance) 10-88 t

+

k 1

55 55 5-4 t

3 3

l t

22-3 12 s1 2-2 1

1 1

e 1

11 1

1

7 g

i n T

p

/

g 30-1 's 0

J O 000 000 J 0-0 0 --

00 0-i i

i Jan90 - Feb

' Mar Apr May Jun-Jul Aug Sep-Oct Nov Dec90 1990 L

_ ~ - -.

- 0 Open irs Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance)

D Closed irs Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance)

O Prucedural Noncompliance irs (Maintenance) 10-5-

4 4.

.3 3

3 3

e 2 '<

2 i

2

'2 2

C

/

y -,

?

z 1 s i:

1 f./

1 1

1 2

's f i i

p i

1 5 b ',

O i! O 000 000 000 0

0 000 0 )

4 0 Oi 0 ',

i i

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)

- This indicator shows the number of open Maintenance incident Reports (irs) that are related to the use of procedures, the number of closed irs that are related to the use of procedures, and the number of open and closed irs that received procedural noncom-

'plial:ce cause codes.

The four procedural noncompliance incidents that occurred in December 1991_were.

irs 910458,910459, and 910460: FC-1066 was not completed.

IR 910443: The maintenanca planner discovered that valve packing had been replaced without supporting documentation.

Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 15,41 & 44 51 r

=

8 Open MWOs

-O-Fod Calhoun Goal 600 -

i

-{

O O

^

^,-

i 0

- - ~ -

Ju!89 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989 800-Open MWOs

-C)- Fort Calhoun Goal 600 -

C O

O O

O 490 3

3 3

[

423 406 3

348 329 O

,-'i

, i

~' -

' ~ '

~

i i

3 i

Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec00 1990 52

800--

Open MWOs

+ Fort Calhoun Goal 600 -

4 C

O O

O-0 0

1 400-293-302 f02 289 287 3

.281 266 1

200-0

^

.Jah91.. Feb. L Mar Apr May Jun

' Jul.

Aug

.Sep Oct Nw Dec91 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDEH BACKLOG

, (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE MAINTENAh-lE)

This indicator shows the number of corrective non outage Maintenance Work Orders l(MWOs) that were open at the end of the reporting month.

The goal for this indicator is to have less than 450 corrective non-outage maintenance

- work orders remaining open.

Data Source:l Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

(

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba

- Adverse Treno. None-SEP 36 9

i-L J.

w Completed Scheduled Activities (EM)

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal

- _i ;

100% -

80%-

C O

O O

O

^O V

V 60%

10/5 10/12 10/19 10/26 11/2 11/9 11/16 11/23 11/30 12/7 12/14 12/21 12/28 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Electrical Maintenance. Maintenance activities includ9 MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.:

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reoortina Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 89 %

Week 2 87 %

f Week 3 76 %

Week 4 93%

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 L

o 54

l

- Completed Scheduled Activities (PE)

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 100 % -

80%-

C C

60% -

40%

9/28 10/5 10/12 10/19 10/26 11/2 11/9 11/16 11/23 11/30 12/7 12/14 12/21 12/28 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MdlNTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE EQUIPMENT)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as

-- compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Pressure Equipmen* Maintenance, Maintenance actir"% include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibreliens,.9nd miscellaneous maintenat activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reoortina Month -

Comoteted Scheduled Activities

- Week 1 82 %

Week 2 88 %

Week 3 83 %

Week 4 100%

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba l

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 L

1 l

I l

- Completed Scheduled Activitics (GM)

-O-Fort C sinoun Goal

.'100% -

l l

^

80%-

O O

O 60% -

.40%

9/28 10/5 _10/12 10/19 10/26 11/2 11/9 11/16 11/23 11/30 12/7 12/14 12/21 12/28 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (GENERAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as

. compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning General Main-tenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%' General Maintenance was -

unable to raeet this goal for the_most of the time period graphed due to emergent work such as snow removal and additional maintenance support.

Reoortino Month Comoieted Scheduled Activities Week 1 43%

Week 2 82 %

Week 3 75 %

Week 4 75 %

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba

- Adverse Trendi None SEP 33 56

Completed Scheduled ActMties(MM)

--O-Fort Calhoun Goal 100 % -

80%-

O-O O

O O

60%-

40%

9/28 10/5 10/12 10/19 10/26 11/2 11/9 11/16 11/23 11/30 12/7 12/14 12/21 12/28 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDUl.ED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Mechanical Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort _Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%

Reoortino Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities

. Week 1.

88%

Week 2

- 90%

Week 3 96%

Week 4 100%

Data Source:- Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 57

- Completed Scheduled Activities (IC)

-O-Fort Calhoun Goat 100% -

80% -

C O

O O

60%-

40%

9/28 10/5 10/12 10/19 10/26 11/2 11/9 11/16 11/23 11/30 12/7 12/14 12/21 12/28 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL)

- This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning instrumenta-tion & Control. Maintr asnce activities include MWRs,- MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous mamtenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%

Reoortina Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 95 %

Week 2

. 78%

Week 3 96 %

Week 4 95 %

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 58

Tnis page intenocaalh sft blank.

du

/

b t

3-Numb 6.

, Missed STs Resulting in LERs 2-1 1

1 1-i j

0 0

o i

i i

Jan89 Feb Mar Apt May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989 3-l Number of Miesed STs Resulting in LERs 9

.. = - -

2-1-

l 0

0 0

Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec00 1990 l

00-

l l

b 3-h 4

O Numi>or of Missed STs Resulting in LERs b

~

.N 1-g<

h A

0 0

i i

9 i

i i

i

'89

'90 Jant,1 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS This indicator shows the number of missed Surveillance Tests (STs) that result in Lic-ensee Event Reports (LERs) during the reporting month. The graph on the left shows the yearly totals for the indicated years.

During the month of December 1991, there were no missed -J'.s that resulted in LERs.

The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is zero.

Data Source: Montn y Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Patterson/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None SEP 60 & 61 61

.~ -

5 Confirmed NPRDS Component Failures O

Suspected NPRDS Component Failures

-k-TotalNPRDS Component Failures 10-8, 8,.

7 N7 6

6 6

5-4, 4

J.

3 1

e 0

. 0 0

0 0

NO,0 0

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS)

REPORTABLE FAILURES This indicator shows the total nurnber of NPRDS component failures and the number of confirmed NPRDS component failures. The total number of NPRDS component failures is based upon the number of failure reports sent to INPO. The number of confirmed NPRDS component failures is b? sed upon the number of f ailure reports that have been accepted by INPO The difference between these two figures is the number of failure reports si!!I under review by INPO.

During December.1991, there were no (0) confirmed NPRDS component failures.

The industry average for et ied NPRDS component failures is 10 per month.

Data Source: Javiorski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source) -

Accountability: Jaworski/ Dowdy Adverse Trend: None c2

+-w.---

-g

,,_+,..,_u_-y

+

m

.-._eem,,, _,,

,_m_-

_ Greater Than One Failure 40-

~+- Greater Than Two Failures 35-

~&-

Greater Than Five Failures 3-

"N,

=

25-20-E i

15-

~ _ _

10-0

?

5-nv g

W

,e g

0-Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 NUMBER OF NPRDS MULTIPLE FAILURES This indicator shows the number of NPRDS reportable failures over the preceding eighteen months sorted by component manufacturer and model number. The indicator is divided into three parts: manufacturer model numbers with more than one failure in eighteen months, manufacturer model numbers with more than two failures in eighteen months, and manufacturer model numbers with more than five failures in eighteen months.

During the past eighteen months, there were seventeen model types that had more than one failure in eighteen months. Eight of these had more than two failures in eighteen months. One component type, Gaulin P18 pumps, had more than five failures. The model types with more than two failures are: Bettis CB 415SR valve operators (3 fall-ures), Byron Jackson 28RXL pumps (4 failures), the pressurizer (5 failures), Manton Gaulin P18 pumps (12 failures), General Electric AK-2A 25 circuit breakers (4 failures),

CR120 relays (3 failures),12HEA61 lockout relays (3 failures), and 50-570 power sup-plies (3 failures).

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/ Dowdy Adverse Trend: None m

15-

--+- Components With More Than One Failure X

Components With More Than Two Failures 10-5-

X X

n 0

Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 cA

15-GOOD Component; With More Than One Failure

--+--

V

--X-Components With More Than Two Failures 10-S-

o X

X X

h A

X 0

m Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Au0 Sep Oct Nov Dec91 n1AINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS The Maintenance Effectiveness Indicator was developed following guidelines set forth by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Opera-tional Data (NRC/AEOD). The NRC/AEOD is currently developing and verifying a maintenance effectiveness indicator using the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) component failures.

This indicator has been revised t how the number of NPRDS components with more than one failure during the last elr.en months and the number of NPRDS compo-nents with more than two failures du. g the last eighteen months. The number of NPRDS components with more than two failures in an eighteen month period should 1

indicate the effectiveness of plant maintenance. (This change applies only to the Sep-tember through December 1991 data. The data for January through August 1991 is based on a twelve month interval.)

L L

During the last 18 reporting months there were 12 NPRDS components with more than L

1 failure. 2 of the 12 had more than two failures. The tag numbers of the components with more than two failures are CH-1 A aqd CH 1B.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba l

L Adverse Trend: None m

~. -

u.

20-Check Valve Failure Rate

--b-Industry Oneck Valve Failure Rate n

10-5-

--A A

~

g a-----A-A A

A A

N

&- Y O

Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 EG

l 20-Calculated Check Valve f ailure Rate per Million Component Hours I

- ndustry Check Valve Faiwre Rate per Million Component Hours 15.

-O-Fort Calhoun 1991 Goai(2.00 E 6) 10 10-GOOD l 1

V 5-1 O

O O

O N'

0

'89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun - Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 91 Check Valve Fa!!ures CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE l

This indicator shows the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate, the Fort Calhouroal i

and the industry check valve failure rate. This rate is based upon failures during the previous 18 months. The check valve failures at Fort Calhoun Sta%n, for the previous two years, are shown on the left.

The data for the industry check valve failure rate is three months behir>:1 the reparting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the data.

For September 1991, the Fort Cahoun Station reported an actual check valve failure

- rate of 6.07 E 7 while the industry reported an actual failure rate of 2.81 E 6. At the and of December, the Fort Calhoun Station reported a calculated check valve failure rate of-6.07 E 7.

The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a failure rate of 1.96 E 6, Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Accountability:Jaworski/Rollins Adverse Trend: None SEP 43 i

67 Y

i-e r w-

-e

-e y

.w..

,4.-~,----r r-.-_,.h---_-

..m.m..

m

__,rm-r.._-.r-_.r--m.e-e-_

Secondary System CPI l

Secondary System CPI Limit 1.5 -

--O-Industry Upper Quartile 1-

-l l

l l

l l-l l

l 0.5 -

C 0

0 i

i i

e i

i i

i Jan89 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989 300 -

- H-Hours Chemistry is Outsioe OG Guidelines 250-200-150-100-50-0

s

,s Jan89 Feb Ma' Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989 Secondary System CPI l

Secondary System CPI Limit 1.5 -

-O-l'dustry Upper Quartile 1-l l

l l

l l-l l

l 0.5 -

0--C ih r i i

i i

i Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 l-1990 300-250-Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidelines 200-150-100-50-i j

0-l'

-N l'

Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 m

. ~. -.

i.

Secondary System CPI

- j

- l Secondary System CPI Limlt

--O-Fort Calhoun Goal (.4b)

GOOD i -

1995 INPO Industry Goaf (0.30) 3,$,,

O-InrJustry Upper Quartl.a

- i 1-i l

l l

l l-j 03s o 34

__g h%g

0. 5 -

Ty,? 'y a

u u

a u

u u

u i

i i

0-Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 7

10'a.

t eh

- - -- % of Hours Chemistry 13.Outside OG Guideline $

GOODj 6%-

V 4%-

M '* -

l u

y y

es w>

a

+-

Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY l

The top graph, Secondary System Chemistry Performance index (CPI), is calculated using the following three parameters: cation conductivity in steam generator blowdown, sodium in st6am generator blowdown, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxyig,n. The bottom graph shows the percent of total hours of 13 parameters exceed-in0 the Owners Group (OG) guidelines during power operation.

The Fort Calhoun goal for the CPI is 0.45. The INPO 1995 Industry goalis 0.30. The CPI was reported as 0.463 for the month of Novernber. The industry upper quartile value for this indicator was 0.16 for August 1989 through De: 1989. The CPlindustry value then changed to 0.24 for 1990.

L The percent of hours outside the OG guidelines was reported as 0.31% for the month of November, The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed for collection and evaluation of the station chemist 7 data.

Data source: Franco /Glantz (Manags,/ Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Schmidt Adverse Trend: None m

?

J-+---+

.e-.-.

-a_we+,+mm.

e te h e mew,am,em.--y.-..--w_mi

,v em, mig

-y y.

9 y

-,y.

g9y_py.

9

,,y._.,gpp,.

,9

,9%,

r - _. _.. _.._

--.._______.._m.._

l i

f 10 4 -

~ ~ ~-

~ *"

-M-Pnmary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit i

8%-

6%-

4%-

2%.

Y%

fA Jan89 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989

- 10% -

r

-+4--

Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit 8%-

1 6%-

4%-

s -

2%-

y,

' 0%

X t'

r, Jan90 Feb

' Mar Apr May Jun Jul

'Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 ypa s.

.-->.wyy e=

T1w--y%g.-rme'w amr-res.+-r*--~wem-mer-r-mWw*-e w-ew--wmg---s,ww-Wo.-ems.-e.--e+gw ei we-m---eams rs

--**Cv* Jim

--=w*9 ir"w w

w v-w w r"'

~. _.. -...... - -

i 10% -

+ Primary System Chemistry Porcent of Hours Out of Umit amoun Goal 8%-

0%-

GOOD 4%-

i h'. $ ' 2% -

C C

O

, 0%

2-m o

m m

89 '90 Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit indicator tracks the primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters.

Typically, luhlum is the parameter that is out of limit.100% equatcs to all six parameters

~

being out of limit for the month. This indicator is one month behind the repotilng month.

The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 2%;

The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as 0% for the month of November.

A' plant outage in Novemter and December 1990 resulted in a higher percontage of hours out of limit.

' Data Source: Franco /Glantz'(Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Smith-Adverse Trend! None-f 71-s

Q g

'8[b$d, J,. _. _.._.,.___. _ __.._,,-.

.-...____._,u

i <

l

=+ Auxi2ary i ystem (CCW) Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits

)

-O-Industry Upper Quartile t

t 15-C C

[ c 9-t 6-

~

U C

C C

C D

C C

O l'

+-)

',. A Jan8b Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989

\\

+ Mixiliary System (CCW) Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits 10-t

-O-Industry Upper Quartile g,

8-7-

6-4-3-

D 2-1-

0-O 3-r-C C

,C D1 w i m

m

, - i Jan90- Feb-Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec00 1990

- 72 e

w 4

we

,4 y

r-

-<-y

-p y

m3 rw--r--H-tT'

-*w--

V e--e-w-

Ne-e--

-ry

10%-

+ % of Hours Aurliiary System (CCW) Chemistry is Outside Omlon t.$ks

-D-Industry Upper Quartile l

j

- 0%-

I GOOD r' '

6%-

y i

l 4%-

2%-

i P

C U

O C

O 3

C C

C 0

0 0 og

,s

.s

[.39 90.'

Dar$0 Jan Feb Var _,

,s

,,,,,s

,,,,,i r

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91-AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HollRS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS f

The ~ Auxiliary System Chemistry liours. Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside the station 3

chemistry limit. The above chemistiy indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed for datamilection and evaluation of the chemistry data for the

station, t

The auxiliary system chemistry hours outside station limits was reported as zero hours

- for the month of November;The last out of station limits condition occurred in June and was due to a low nitrite levelin CCW coolant.

The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal for this indi$or is a maximum of 2%.

The industry upper quartile value for auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside station limits is 0.35-l Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source) r Accoumability: Patterson/ Smith

. AdverseTrendi None It 7J

s i

f t.

Y i

Number of Out of Service instruments e

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal M

18-16-k 14 -

12-3 L'

l !

l

)

10-l j 0

-g-h_g_g_g_g l

j I]

e s_

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 l

74 l-l.

m-

---m

,c,

.rs-.

-n-9 y

-.g

_.. ~

f l

18~

Q Number of instruments Out of.Sorvico 17 10-

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal y ;

14-12~

1o~

{

e-j e~

Q Q

2 O~~-~

,~~~-- O ~~~~.,&

O~~-~

~~~

4-3 3

3

?

b N

Jan91 -Feb Mar Apr May Jun- - Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dac91 IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS CUT OF SERVICE i

This indicator shows the total number of in line chem:stry system instruments that are out of service at the end of the reporting month. The chemistry systems involved in this indicator include the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sampibg System (PASS).

At the end of December there was a total of 17 in line chemistry Instruments that were out-of service. Of these 17 instruments,13 were from the Secondary System and 4 were from PASS.

The increase in the PASS Instruments out of service is due to removal of the germa-nlum detectors from service while construction is being done in the old chemistry lab.

The increase in Secondary instruments out of service is due to a new method of deter-mining if an instrument is out of service. As of this reporting period, the enire instrument channel is considered inoperative it: 1) the instrument is inoperative, 2) the chart re-corder associated with the instrument is inoperative,3) the alarm function Associated with the instrument is inoperative. This change is being made becauw ' any of the functions named above are not operational, then the instrument is not performing its intended function, -

~

JThe Fort Calhoun goal.for the number of in line chemistry system instruments that aro l-

- out of service has been set at 6. Six out of service chemistry instruments make up 10%

~

of all the chemistry instruments that are counted for this indicator.

Data Source: Patterson/Renaud (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None -

7s v

l-

h O

Total'Vaste Produced (Kilograms)

L Fed, ala State Monthff imit (Kg) 10000-8556 8000-

~

6000-

j 4000-2000-1346 989.4 812.4 M"

$'1 0-i y

Jan89 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989 O

TotalWaste Produced (Kiiograms)

- Federal & State Monthly Limit (Kg)

~

1000-800-600 -

ic 390.8 L-400-L 222.2 2x2 164.5 144.5 200- p 0

i i

i e

i i

a i

i Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun-Jul Aug. Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 76

.J

...,y_..

.c,

Q Total Waste Produced (Kilograms) 4 Federal & State Monthly Limit (Kg) 1000-i 800-600-400-200-154.5 24 9

'39.9 34.9 i

15 4.g 15 0

0 0

0 4

9.7 gg 4 -- 3 I

I i

3 -

4 4

I i

4 4

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 HAZAFIDOUS WASTE PRODUCED r

' This indicator shows the total amount of hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun i

each month. This hazardous waste consists of non halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced.

During the month of December,0.0 kilograms of non halogenated hazardous waste was produced.154.5 kilograms of halogenated hazardous waste was produced, and 0.0 kilograms of other hazardous waste was produced.

The amount of halogenated hazardous waste increased in December because of a change !9 the mothod of record keeping, Hazardous waste is no longer counted on a month!y baris. It is counted based upon a full drum of wate.

Date Source: Patterson/Henning (Manager / Source)

L Accountability: Patterson/Henning i

Adverse Trend: Nono i

77-l 1

l l "r

~.. _, _ _.. _. _ _ _... _,,. _ - -.. = _. - - -, - -....

D Highest Exposure for the Month (mrem) 5000-Q Highest Exposure for the Quarter (mHom) -

E Highest Exposure for the Year (mRom) 4000-i 3000-2000-1165 490 1989 i

I l

5000-P O Highest Exposure for the Month (mrem) 4000-

@ Highest Exposure for the Quarter (mrem)

E Highest Exposure for the Year (mAem)

~~"

3000+

2223-0 1

1990--

i n

~;

.-...i.-..

5000-OPPD 4500 mrem /yr. Limit 4000-O Highest Exposure for the Month (mrem)

T Highest Exposure for the Ouarter (mrem)

~

W Highest Exposure for the Year (mrem) 1 2000-1182 1000-259 0

kh k khk k-h l

l December 1991 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE During December 1991, an indiv.$ual accumulated 259 mRom which was the highest individual exposure for the month.

The maximum individual exposure to date for the fourth quarter of 1991 was 411 mrem.

The maximum individual exposure reported for the year 1991 was 1,182 mRom.

The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem /

year, The 1991 Fort Calhoun goalis 2,000 mrem / year.

Date Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) i Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None l

l D

250 Q

Montn!y Personnel Contaminations

- Cumulative PertonnelContaminations 200 -

-O-Fort Calhoun Annual Goal

-O-Industry Upper Quartilo

~

150 -

C O

O O

100 -

A 50-

~f 16 16 13 14 13 11 9

8 10 8

4 6

M M

M 0

I I

I i

'l 4

4 I

i i

Jan89 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 89 1989 D

Monthly Personnel Contaminations Cumulative Personnel Contaminations

-O-Fort Calhoun Annual Gaal

-O-Industry Upper Quartile 250 -

/

200 -

150 -

C O

O O

-C O

O-O O-O

--C O

O O

O t

100 -

68 68 7

7@

GO-g 12 /

15 m

(

h g

5 1

4 2

5 5

g 0-i i

i i

Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 90 1990 l

l

237 250 -

D thnthly Personnet Contaminations

'""1 GOCD Cumulative Personnel Contaminations

~

2@-

-O-Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (90) y

-O-Industry Upper Quartile (129) 157 z.

E

! 150-Qt i

o o-c c

c c

a-a s

100-1 I

O O

O O-C O

O O

O--C O

O

/

l 50 -

l ~~"

0

~

0-i i

'89 90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS This indicator shows the number of skin and clothing contaminations for the reporting month. A total of 55 contaminations have occurred during 1991.

There was a total of 237 skin and clothing contaminations in 1990.

The 1991 goal for skin and clothing contam! nations is 90.

The industry upper quartile value for total skin and clothin0 contaminations is 129 per unit annually.

Data Source: PattersonAVilliams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Positive Trend SEP 15 & 54 81

This page intentionally left blank.

100 % -

Decontaminated Auxiliary Building' Radiation Controlled Area

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal (nonoutage months) 90%-

(0 0

0 0

0 80%-

h 70%-

GOOD 60%-

50 %

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA This indicator (formerly titled

Decontaminated Auxiliary Building") was revised in June 1991 to include the new Radwaste building and the areas of the C/RP building that will be considered Radiologically Controlled. The graph shows the percentage of the RCA that is decontaminated (clean) based on the total square footage, a Fort Calhoun goal of 85% decontaminated auxiliary building (non outage months) and a goal of 75%

decontaminated auxiliary building (outage months).

At the end of the reporting month,89.9% of the total square footage of the RCA was decontaminated.

Date Source: Patterson/Gundal(Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None SEP54 m

10-O Number of identified PRWPs 8-7 6-

/g Yn e

/.

4-i 5, :

2 2

2-m 1

1 1

1

,,lL' O

?

O O

O i

i i

Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 00 1990 m

i

10 3 O Number of identified PRWPs 8-G-

4 4-5 2

2 2

g 7

+

1 1

sz a

O gu 0

0 pa 0

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 91 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator shows the number of Poor Radio-logical Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the reporting month. The PRWPs are identified through a review of the monthly Radiological Occurrence Reports and Personnel Contamination Reports.

The number of PRWPs which are identified each month should indirectly provide a means to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance.

During the month of December 1991, two PRWPs were identified. The PRWPs were: a High Radiation Area entry violation, and an arm contamination that occurred while j

changing WD 17 filters.

Data Source: PattersonM/illiams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None SEP52 as

l Q Total Number of Hot Spots O Number of Additional Hot Spots identified 75-M, M

50-46 40 46 j!

m 25-i i

i 0-Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 90 1990 m

J I

Total Number of Hot Spots f

[]

Nurnber of Additional Hot Spots identified

~

.~

--e--

Fort Calhoun Goal y

./

65 O

65 63 63 n A.

h.

W.

)

54 54 55 y

7g; g

s

=.,3 E'

53 g

j l

L ij

- f "f

d:

3 M

'q 4

jd

[8 e

4 q

S L

4; z)

]

( '%p,_ [']

l Fg

4 y

h j

$l-j j

j S

y j

w$

y a

u j

j;p g),

g pf

)

q m

g ll

).

}}

l:

25 -

7, W

s e

4 h

h h

]h fj hl :l

' y, I"#

g52 j h(

L Iyl10 0

h0 k1 h h 1 h 1 0

0 1

1 h 0

s*i i

i i

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 NUMSER OF HOT SPOYS This indicator shews the total number of hot s;.

5 which have been identified to exisi in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been documented through the use of a hot spot identification sheet. A hot spot is defined ac a smalllocalized s

<gh raciation.

A het spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item or piecs u:,quipment is at least 5 times the General Area dote rate and the item or piece of equipment's done rate ls ecual to or greater than 100 mrem / hour.

ALARA personnel conducted an in-depth survey of the entire auxiliary building during the month of August. During December one hot spot was eliminated in the piping of WD-1161 in Room 6 and ors nev hot spot was identified in Room 9A.

. The Fort Catheun goal for this i:-dicator is 41.

Date Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager /Soucce)

.I A couatability: Patierson/Lovett Ajverse Trends: None 87

800 -

Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies)

Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies) 600- Cumulative AnnualGoal(Curies)

$c 400-8 200-1 C

O O

Og 0

~

' "'^ -

M 4

1 i

i i

Jan89 - Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989 800-Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies)

Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies) umuladve Annual Goal (Curies) 600-

$c 400-8 o

o o

O O

O o

o

/

I 200-

)

l '" '

~ ' ~ -

0 t' i

a i

i i

l' i

i i

t i

Jc30 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 l

1990 88

l Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies) 800-Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies)

-O-Cumulative AnnualGoal(Curies) 600 -

GOOD Y

465 Mit wl 400-e C

O O

O M

h 200-164 p

8 Rfl s

1 ~ kh i

i i

0-i~~ 3 - - i -

i i

i

'89

'90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGE 0 TO THE ENVIRONMENT.

The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to tha environment is shown for Janu-ary 1,1991 through June 30,1991. A total of 42.2 curies have been released to the environment during this time.

The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 is 340 curies for this indica-tor.

The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.

Date Scurm: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Trausch c

Adverse Tiend: None p.

89

Monthly Radioactive liquid Discharged Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged

-O-Cumulative AnnualGoal 400-C O

O O

300-m

$200-0 100-8.6 194 17 7 27.7 40.7 Las 20 10.3 13.8# ram' 23 3

- - ma m,,-.

o i

i i

i j

Jan89 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989 9

$ 1200-9 900-S 600-

+1776 300-130.s 97.81 74.s 104s 55.96 86.92 s2.72 87.37 112 110.1 73 1s g

i i

(

i I

I i

i I

1 1

1 4

Jan89 Feb Mar Apt May

.Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989 Monthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged

-O-Cumsiative AnnualGoal 300-C O

O O

O---C O

O O

O g200-100-8 23

_18 4-4 3-3 17,1 17 6.04

" g 15.3 0

'7 i

i i

i Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec90 1990 40000 -

m C2 30000 -

m 20000-E E 10000-

/4654 O

3199 2834 3No 3510 3250 328c 4170 2070 5

N N

AN 0

4 i

i i

i 4

i i

Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Atg Sept Oct Nov Dec00 1990 90

Monthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged Cumulative Radioactivo liquid Discharged

-O-Cumulative AnnualGoal 231 228 C

O O

O 175 200-s GOOD

's 100-0 V

0 % g _ g,3 _ g "ig y,

28.2 -

4 i,

i, i

i i

i

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 g 40000-2 y 30000-20000 -

C E 10000-S 2370 29104 800 asco 3750 soto r--r,r, rm,rm,rm rmi c

i 0-i i

i i

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 L' QUID nADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for January 1,1991 through June 30,1991. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environmer,t from all sources totaled 70.3 curies during this time. The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 is 225 curies.

The bottom graph shows the volurne of liquid radioactive waste that has been released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and steam generators. The volume of liquid radioactive waste discharged to the environment frorn the radioactive waste monitor i

- tanks and the steam generators totaled 19.2 million gallons from January through June 1991. The liquid radioactive waste that was released to the environment includes liquid l

relcased from the steam generators due to the fact that radioisotopes were detected in the steam generator blowdown. The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the l

environment is calculated every six months.

l Data Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None 91 l

I

.30-

_ Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Does not include System Failures) 25-20-15-10-5-

0 Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Gep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 120-

- Security System Failures 80_-

j r

l l

.40-L

~0 i

i i

i-i i

6.

i i

i l'

'Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep

~ Oct Nov Dec90 1990 92

m Loggable/ Reportable inckients (Does not include 30-System Failures)

GOOD 25-20-V 3

~

10 -

5-0

-Jan91 Feb Mar Apr _ May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 Security System Failures GOOD 120-9

~

.40-0 i

--i i

i i

i Jan91 Fob Mar :

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct.

Nov Dec91 LOGG ABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURil Y)

.The Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) Indicator is depicted in two separate

. graphs. The first chart depicts the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents con-ceming Licensee Designated Vehicles (LD_Vs); Security Badges; Access Control and-

Authorization, and Security Key Control which occurred during the reporting m inth. The bottom graph shows the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning secu-rity system failures which occurred during the reporting month.

._ During the month of December 1991, there were 45 loggable/ reportable incidents identi-fied. System failures accounted for 42 (93%) of the loggable/ reportable incidents, and 30 (67%) of these were environmental failures. The.three loggable security incidents:

. involved two incidents where plant personnel failed to follow proper escort procedures l.

l and one lost / unattended security badge. The nurnber of loggable/ reportable incidents E

~ reported was the towest during 1991. System failures (non-environmental) depicted a substantial and consistent decline throughout 1991

- Data Source:- Sefick/Woerner (Manager /Sotre.e) oE

. Accountability: Sefick.

. Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 93

[._'

l:

-e v

=

o

~

3 Security Report' Log incideits September 1991 O Secur.) Report / Log incidents October 1991 i

3 Security Report / Log incidents November 1991 O Security Report / Log incidents Decembor1991 16-Month Total incidents Jan '91 6

Feb '91 o

GOOD Mar '91 2

Apr '91 3

gg_

y May '91 1

Jun'91 1

Jul'91 2

Aug '91 1

8-SeP '91 4

Oct '91 2

Nov '91 2

i Dec '91 3

4-3 E5%1 2

2 2

1 WM l

0 o

o Mo o

o o

o g,.

LDVs Badges Access Control Key Control SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN This indicator now shows the number of incidents concerning the followhg items for the reporting mcnth: Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDVs), Security Badges, Access Control and Authorization, and Security Key Control.

Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sefick Adverse Trend: None SEP 58

\\

50-

- O Environmental Failures O Failures 40-1 30-24 y

20-10 -

6 6

4 s

s.

hh 2

'a

'"'~~"l 0

0 0

fd,.

0 0

e i

i i

Alarms CCTV Computer Search Equip.

Doors Card Readers SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES This indicator shows the number of incidents concerning the following iter for the reporting month: Alarm System Failures, CCTV failures, Security Computer Failures, Search Equipment Failures, Door Hardware Failures, and Card Reader Failures. Alarm systems _and CCTV failures are now divided into two categories: environmental failures -

and failures as defined in the performanco indicator definitions.

Number of incidents:

November 91 December '91 System Failures Env. Failures Failures Env Failures Failures Alarms 23 8-6 6

CCTV 18 1

24 2

- Computer N/A 0

N/A 0

Search Equipment N/A 0

N/A 0

Door Hardware N/A 6

N/A 4

Cagl Readers N!A 0

N!A 0

Totals 41

-15 30 1.2 Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sefick/Petersen Advrse Trend: None SEP 58 95

.-n_.-=..

-- Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts

- 10%-

9%-

8%-

7%-

6%-

5%~

4%-

3%~

2%-

r 1%-

0%-

1 Jan89 Feb'-

. Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989 10%-

-9%-

- Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts 8%-

7%-

-6%-

5%-

4%-

3%-

2%-

1%-

0%--

.Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun

.Jul Aug Sep.

Oct Nov Dec90 1993 96

.. _ - -. _.. -. ~. -. ~ -

~ Arrount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts 2o

'//

10%-

.9%-

0- Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal 8W' GOOD 7%-

6%-

5%-

4%-

/

C O

O O

O

^

?%-

2%-

1%-

-0%

Jan91 Feb

. Mar Apr May. Jun Jul Aug S9p Oct Nov Dec91

- AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON-OUTAGE)

This procurement indicator displays the percentage of open, non-outage maintenance l --

' items that'are on hold awaitlog parts, to the total amount of open, non outage mainte-nance items.

There was a total of 640 open, non-outage maintenance work orders (MWOs) with 12 L

l(1.9%) of these MWOs on hold awaiting parts at the end of the reporting month, i-The 1991 Fort Calt.oun Goal for this indicator is 3.5% of the total number of open, non-outage MWOs awaiting parts.

L

. Data Source: Willrett/ CHAMPS (Manager / Source)

' Accountability:Willrett/Fraser u

l

- Adverse Trend: None h

97

-,__ai

---re es

-- +.

20'-

Spare Parts inventery Value ($ Million) 15-1 10 8 5-0

'Jan89 Feb Mar Apr Ma/

Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989

. Spare Parts inventory Value ($ Million) 20-i- '

10-5-

~0 Jan90. Feb Mar Apr May Jun J01 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 m

.~.

.. -... ~

= _. -., -

- -. Spare Parts inventory Value ($ Million) 15-

)

10-

~

b-0, Jan91 F9b Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep

_ Oct lav Dec91

SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE r

The spare parts inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the erid of December was reported as $14,085,751.

Date Source: Steele/Huliska (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Willrett/McCorr. lick Adverse Trend: None Sparr Parts issued ($ Thousa Ms) 500-400-300.<

-200-100-0--

i.

i i

Nov90 Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun-Jul Aug Sep Oct91 SPARE PARTS ISSUED -

The value of the spare parts issued during October totaled $242,735. Data for Decem-ber was not available at the publication of this report due to a printer problem.

[ Data Source:- Steele/ Miser (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Willrett/McCormick Adverse Trend: None L

l.

i m

f..

- -Inventory Accuracy _

100 % -

/

L-95%-

4

~

90%-

s-

.. 85 %

i_

Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul - Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 m-i Pick Tickets With Parts Not Avaliable 10%-

^l:

9%-

8%-

7%-

6%-

5%-

4%-

3%-

2%-

'1%-

0%

i:

Jan90- Feb Mar _ Apr May son-Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 100'

a,

.: ~. ; -,

,-cn v-nm, e.

_,1=L',

Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Does not include 30-System Failures).

GOOD V 10-5-

_e O-i i

i i

i

'Jan911-Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 Security System Failures GOOD 120-t 80-N 40-0 i

i i

Jan91-Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 LOGG ABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)

The Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) Indicator is depicted in two separate graphs. The first chart depicts the tota! numbar of loggable/ reportable incidents con-cerning Licerisee Designated Vohicles (LDVs); Security Badges; Access Control and Authorization, and Security Key Ccr,' ol which occurred during the reporting month. The bottom graph shows the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning secu-rity system faiiures which occurred during the reporting rnonth.

During the mc, nth of December 1991, there were 45 loggable/ reportable incidents identi-fied. System failures accounted for 42 (93%) of the loggable/ reportable incidents, ano 30 (67%) of these were environmental failures. The three loggable security incidents

-involved two incidents where plant personnel f ailed to follow proper escort procedures and one lost / unattended security badge. The number of loggable/reportsbie incidents reported was the lowest during 1991. System failures (non-environmental) depicted a substantial and consistent decline throughout.1991.

~

- Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

L

. Accountability: Sefick l

l; Adverse Trend: None SEP 58

\\-

50 l

E Security Rooort/ Log incidents September 1991 O Security Report / Log incidents October 1991 5 Security Report / Log incidents November 199i O Security Report / Log incidents December 1991 16-Month Total incidents

~~

Jan'91 6

Feb '91 0

l GOOD Mar '91 2

Apr '91 J

3p_

y May '9 1

Jun'91 1

Jul '91 2

Aug '91 1

8-SeP '91 4

Oct '91 2

Nov '91 2

Doc '91 3

4-3 RZ?y,@]

2 2

2

' > ' 'M1 1

l 0

0 0

EO O

O 0

0 0

0 0-i LDVs Badges Access Control Key Control SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN This indicator now shows the number of incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month: Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDVs), Security Badges, Access Control and Authorization, and Security Key Control.

Data Source: Sefick/Woerrer (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sefick Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 94

50-O Environmental Failures O Failures 40-GOODI 30-l 24 y

20-10-6 6

.lWl 2

0 0

0

^

0 0

0 i

i i

i Alarms CCTV Computer Search Equip.

Doors Card Readers SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES This indicator shows the number of incidents concerning the following itemt. for the reporting month: Alarm System Failures, CCTV failures, Security Computer Failures, Search Equipment Failures, Door Hardware Failures, and Card Reader Failures, Alarm systems and CCTV failures are now divided into two categories: environmental failures and failures as defined in the performance indicator definitions.

Number of 'ncidents:

November 91 December '91 System Faaures Env. Failures Failures Env. Failures Failures Alarms 23 8

6 6

CCTV 18 1

24 2

Computer N/A 0

N/A 0

Search Equipment N/A 0

N/A 0

Door Hardware N/A 6

N/A 4

Card Readers N/A 0

N!A 0

Totals 41 15 30 12 Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sefick/Petersen Adverse Trend: None

'EP 58 95

. ~ _ _...

Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Pads -

j, _

-9%--

8%-

7%-

6%-

5%-

~4%-

3%-

2%

1%-

O%

Jan89-Feo Mar -

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecS9 1989 10%-

9%-

Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts eat,-

7%-

6%-

p

-. 5% -

4%-

3%-

()

2%-

,1%-

0%

JanSO Feb Mar Apr. _May

-Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 f-1990 96 I

~

4 Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts 0%-

-O--

Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal 8%-

GOOD 7%-

6%-

4%-

[

C O

O O

O mW O

O

^

3%-

2%~

1%-

0%

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON-OUTAGE) l This procurement indicator displays the percentage of open, non outage maintenance l--

items that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total amount of open, non-outece mainte-I nance items.

There was a total of G40 open, non-outage maintenance work orders (MWOs) with 12 l-(1.9%) of these MWOs on hold awaiting parts at the end of the reporting month.

L l~

The 1991_ Fort Calhoun Goal for this indicator is 3.5% of the iMal number of open, non-L outage MWOs awaiting parts.

l-Data Source: Willrett/ CHAMPS (Manager / Source)

Acccaniability: Willrett/Fraser l

Adverse Trend: None l

97

~

- =.. -, _... - -

i - Spyre Pa s inventory Value ($ Million) 15-10-S-

0-Jan89 Feb Mar.

Apr May.

Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989 20-

- Spare Parts inventory Value ($ Million)

I e

15-10- 0 j-Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 98

.m_.-

20-Spare Parts triventory Value ($ Million) 15-10-5-

0 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oci Nov Dec91 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The spare parts inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of December

-was reported as $14,085,751.

Data Source: Steele/Huliska (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Willrett/McCormick Adverse Trend: None Spare Parts issued ($ Thousands) 500-400--

300-200-3

'100 -

0

--i Nov90 Dec-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun

- Jul.

Aug Sep ' Oct91 SPARE PARTS ISSUED The:value of the spare parts issued during October totaled $242,735. Data for Decem-

.ber was not available at the publication of this report due to a printer problem.

Data Source: Steele/ Miser (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Wilf rett /McCormick Adverse Trend: None m

i e

Inventor; Accuracy

- 100 % -

/

95 7

90%-

85%

i Jan90 Feb Mar Apr_ _ May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 Pick Tickets With Parts Not Available 10%-

9%-

8%-

7%-

6*4 -

5%-

4%-

3%-

2%-

1%-

0%

Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 100

Inventory Atxuracy

--O--

Fort Calhoun Goal (9B%)

100%-

O O

-O O

O 95% -

SO%

Jan91. Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 INVENTORY ACCURACY This ir.dicator shows the accuracy of the actual parts count for the warehoae compared to the counts contained in the MMIS computer system for the reporting month.

. During December 1991,699 different line items were counted in the warehouse. Of the 699 line itams counted,12 items needed count ad,iustments. The inventory accuracy for the moatil of December was reported as 98.3% The Fort Calhoun 1991 goal for thb

. Indicator la 98%

Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)

AcccuntWi.:ty Willrett/McCormick Adverse Trond: None

% of Pick Tickets Generated When Parts are not

~

Available. etc 5%,

+ Fort Calhoun Goal 4%~

3%~

?%~

. Cr=

C C

4 C

C C

G C

O w

1%]

0%

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr

'May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 91 STOCKOUT RATE This indicator shows the percentage of the number of Pick Tickets gr terated when the amoun* of parts requested is equal to or less than the minimum stocking level and parts are not available.

- During December, a total of 1217 Pick Tickets were generated. Of the 1217 Pick Tick-ets generated,29 Fick Tickets (2.4%) were generated when the amount of parts re-quested was equal to or less than the minimum stocking level and parts were not avail-able. The Fort Calhoun 1991 goal for this indicator is 2%

Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Willrett/McCormick Adverse Trend: None 101

r L

l 1

.)

1

-1 i.

. 2%-

.i Percentage of Total Purchases that are Expedited T

1%-

1

4 1

-0%

8 i

i i

e i

Jan90f Feb Mar

- Apr May Jun-Jul Auo Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990-o 102

k 2%-

-- % of Total Purceases that are Expedited

-O-Fort Calhoun ',991 Goal (0.5%)

1%-

C O

O O

O 0%,

Jan91- _ Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 EXPEDITED PURCHASES This indicator shows the percentage of expedited purchases compared to the total

-number of purchase orders generated during the reporting month.

-During December, there was a total of 292 purchase orders generated. Of the 292

_ purchase orders generated,3 (1%) were expedited purchases.

The expedited purchases'were:1) A hinge arm was ordered for valve HCV-1041B to pass the ISI test. 2) Computer parts were orderea Icr the Emergency Response Facility computer for the security systoni. 3) A valve sleeve was ordered for lagoon valve CL-106 to meet a commitment to the state Environmental Protection Agency, The Fort Calhoun 1991 goal for this indicator is 0,5%.

Dbi Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

- Accountability: Willrett'".r' 'r

- Adverse Trend: Noc9 103

_~

Percentage of Material Requetts for issue with

~

the Request Date the sarne as the Need Date 100% -

80%-

60%-

40%-

20% -

0%

Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 h

i, 104 l

__.___.____-,m 100 -

80-60-40-

-33 20-12 0

-^' - ^-^^^^^^^--

?

\\

i Service invoices COE Invoices Miscettaneous j

1 INVOICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the number of service invoices, COE invoices, and miscellaneous invoices for the month of December 1991.

Date Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Willrett/Fraser Adverse Trend: None Percentage of Material Roquests for issue w3h the Request Date the same as the Need Dato 100% -

80%-

- 60% -

40%-

\\

20%-

0%

Jan91--Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING This indicator sho'vs the percentage of material requests (MRs) for issue with their request date the same as their need date compared to the total number of MRs for issue for the recorting month.

During the month of December, a total of 1217 MRs were received by the warehouse.

Of the 1217 total MRs received by the warehouse,474 MRs (38.9 % of the 1217) were for issue with their request date the same as their need date.

Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Willrett/McCormick Adverse Trend: None 105

600-Total Modification Packages Open 500 -

1

_m 400-300 -

200 Jan89 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989 600 -

- Total Modihcation Packages Open 500-400-

~

300-200 Jan Feb Mar -

Apr May Jun Jul A ag Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 l

l 106

600-,

Total Modification Packages Open 500-425 425 400-l i

337 l 300-

~

j 200

'88

'89 90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecG1 OUTOTANDING MODIFICATIONS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding modifications (excluding outstand-ing modifications which are proposed to be cancelled).

Catecorv -

Reoortino Month Form FC-1133 Backlog /in Progress 15 Mod. Requests Being Reviewed 78 Design Engr. Backlog /in Progress 94 Construction Backlog /in Progress 50 Design Engr. Uodate Backloc/in Procress 27 Total 264 At the end of December,40 additional modification requests had been issued this year ano 29 modification requests had been cancelled. The Nuclear Projects Review Com-mittee (NPRC) had completed 204 backlog modification request reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) had completed 157 backlog modification request rev:ews this year.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source) l Scofield/Lounsbery (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Scofield/Phelps Adverse Trend: None 107

5 Temporary Modifications >1 cyde old (RFO required for Ron, oval)

Temporary Modifications >6 months old (Removable on-line)

--O-Fort Calhoun Goal for Temporary Modifications (0) 6-5-

4-3 3-

[p)))

2 2

2 k

emsb

, kl h-m amwE O

w w

w i

October November December TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING)

This indicator provides information on the number of temporary modifications greater than one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage (RFO) for removal and the number of temporary modifications removable on line that are greater than six months old. Also provided is the Fort Calhoun goal for temporary modifications.

The goal for this indicator was changed in August 1991 to be more indicative of Fort Calhoun's control and management of temporary modifications, There are currently 2 temporary modifications that are greater than one fuel cycle old. Both of these modifica-tions are 100% ready to be removed during the 1992 refueling outage. These are: Al-198 power supply failure alarm, and pressure indication for RW/CCW HXs. In addition, at the end of December there were 2 temporary modificcans installed that were greater than six months old that can be removed on line. These were: handjack close of CCW/

RW valves, which is awaiting a system engineering evaluation of EAR 91-282; and replacement of AC-191/192 valves which are awaiting installation (MWOs 91295 and 91296, scheduled for 1/6/92).

At the end of December, there was a total of 21 TMs installed in the Fort Calhoun Sta-tion.15 of the 21 installed TMs require an outage for removal and 6 are removable on-line, in 1991 a total of 45 temporary modifications have been installed and all but 10 of those have been removed.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Jaworski/Gorence Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 & 71 l

l 1os l

J Go-So-40-30-

___ k 17 18 l

20-10-d 2

1 1

2 2

)

o-o o-3 months 3-6 months

>0 months System Enginooring 60-October 52 o

49 So-November

~

40-December 32 33 24

[

j

- 1 Go-20-

ffay]

16 15 18

]

O

~^

0-3 months 3 6 months

>6 months Design Engineering ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST (EAR) BREAKDOWN This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of EARS assigned to Design Engineer-ing and System Engineering awaiting a technical response from engineering.

At the end of December,5 EARS were in the initiation process and 25 EARS had been resolved anc. - are going through the closecut process.

4 Total EAR breakdown is as follows:

EARS opened during the month 16 Ears closed during the month 8

' Total open EARS open at the end of the month 137 Data Source: JaworskiNan Osdel(Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Phelps Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 109

i i

')

i t

7 ECNs BacAlogged in DEN 200-

+ ECNs Opened During the Month

-V-ECNs Completed During the Month -

150-t 100-50-

~

1

=

W 0

LJan90. - Feb Mar Apr May Jun

' Jul Aug Sep Oct

' Nov - Dec90 1990

't 6

110

~.

ECNs Backlogged in DEN ECNs Opened During the Month

-V-ECNs Completed During the Month 200-150-100-Y y,/

~

(

J.

O Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS This indicator shows the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) awaiting completion by DEN, the nurnber of ECNs opened during the reporting month, and the number of ECNs completed by DEN during the reporting month.

At the end of December 1991, there was a total of 168 DEN backlogged open ECNs.

There were 27 ECNs opened, and 47 ECNs completed during the month.

Although the number of open ECWs is currently high, activities are in progress to reduce the backlog of open ECNs. It is axpected that the number of open ECNs will continue to decrease.

Data Source: Phelps/Pulve re nti (Managa r/ Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 111 I

.-._.-_m._

This page intentionally left blank.

The rnethod of reporting this indicator was revised in 1991.

112 I

O DEN - Engineering not comploto O System Engincoring EnOincoring comploto, MWO not writton Q Maintenanco - MWO completo, awaiting closoout C Maintenanco - work not completo 39 38 39 40-Nbb' 30-24 20-16 12 i o l; g

f $ff j

10-5 3

o O

i 0 - 3 months 3 - 6 months

> 6 months ECNEACILtTY CHANOf.SEEEN O DEN - Engincoring not complete System Enginooring - Enginooring comploto, MWO not wntton Q Maintenanco - MWO comploto, awaiting closoout O Maintenanco - work not completo 70 -

66 30

$2 11 a

11 11

((fyy:.

18-l-

-l o 1

1 3

o O 3 months 3 - 6 months

> 0 months ECN GUBSTITUTE REPLACTMENT PARTS OPEN C DEN Engineonng not comploto O System Enginoonng - waixesown or coniirmatx>n not compioio 50-43 40-30-20 to A }.;

20-

$g.

5 g

g 2

j ok \\ ;

10 O - 3 months 3 - 6 months

> 6 montha ECN.DQCUMENT CHANQER.QPEN ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) that are assigned to Design Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engineering, and Maintenance for the reporting month. The graphs provide data on ECN Facility Changes Open, ECN Substitute Replacement Parts Open, and ECN Document Changes Open.

Data So arce: Phelps/Pulverenti(Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 113 1

I

-3 2.7 2.5 8

2.5 -

2.4 is 9'

$a 2.2 2.2 -

n

'e

7. A 3 3$

r: :.>

2-4 s

u:

s 1.7 1

u a+

4~

6-L M

L 1.5 -

1.4 7

.a

w^

.J p

x.

~

,,],..,.

1

'-'i -

.4;.

9

/

I'I'p nY 1,s.

h Y l'>

. i'y i e'

lC f:.

}

a hO L

We

~

1-0.9 i

~;

el m

Wit w

E

.m,.

,m-

>c,

1:%

0.6

~ q~*.

u -

b;.

w.

a

P y:1 s

o m

m'

+

,$4 T'

W<

W 0.5 -

e W

y&

s

. :.,f

m=. >

s.~+

%o z.:

"yy, y;{ p-

g +

l;9".

.c.$

9G

. l.p-['V,.....

C' s

r vi y

su b.pl.

l i

.^r' '4

.; ;N;

\\

O s/

^M S

W 0

0 1

4 I

I I

l 4

I I

I l

l 3

Jan89 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989 2.5 -

2.08 2-V::s 1.6

@N.> f 7

.p ;,0,;,

1.5 -

1 39 M

+X i 1.35 1,32

/

m 1.25

p 3,17 w

a g

s

.m

y. -

M,,.,i 1.02

, je 6

tm.,

%,v.m. m.ss,

h A,

1-0.94 -

a

_n

+

g, a,% }1;.} [%..

fv, s

') k '

M'g o 4.3.:

.w..-

y-g'

'j {

4 g;. q d?

. i^

p.,-.s Qllf Q

<l'~

l>

ff;

l?f*f3 Q

>s i

8

.y A p' 9.,

,V T

0.6 -

9

w% Q s.

$e 5

, Wi

'c y W

i

-s 3

^

M.x T u.a P.. A y 0.42-

,J a#q/e M:

J:+E 0.5 -

e' [M' '.-

1-

. A.m..( u,

- s :...

,(f.y -

fp';

'c

.'.s..

I:/p:

g Sh

/ -: '.'

t

'Y t-s.,,

V{g"i:.

/j y."

_ ;;s.')-

Lif-

9,

T{ >4.

y s,

f,CR:?

N:s

? q..

-~

ng. :

+<

0;=. -.

s i y;_

y; g

.?

s g4:

w>

3 v.

.c 7>'

}%:s.

Q; 9.y-sg,._

'ggf-

^

,..i f.:

~

n 0

i s

O I

i i

1 1

6 i

I 6

I i

i i

Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 114 t.

I i

t

i Q

1991 Recordable Injury /Illnsss Frequency Rate 5-4.7 GOOD 1990 Recordable injury /lliness Frequency Rate

~6-5 Year Average Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate y

39 3.5 -

3.4 3.32 3.o9 l

2.93 3- #

2.73 2M 25-2.4 2.25 7E d(

M 2-p_-6

- g 7

1.58

%s g

7

~ N hd_X

/

f y

y c

0.5 -

/

~

^

gg

'n

-~

4 I

I i

i i

I I

I i

1 i

1 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY RATE This indicator shows the 1991 monthly,1990 monthly, and the Fort Calhoun Station 5 year monthly average of the recordable injury / illness cases frequency rates.

A recordable injury / illness case is reported if Nuclear Operations Division personnel are injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid. The record-able cases frequency rate is computed on a year to-date basis.

There were two recordable injury / illness cases reported during the month of December.

The two recordable injury / illness cases wero: an employee received medication for ear pain suffered as a result of air pressure differential experienced while going through the PAL door; and an employee received medication for pain suffered as a result of a fall on the ice. There has been a total of 18 recordable injury / illness cases in 1991, Year Recordable Cases Year End Rate 1988 11 2,6 1989 11 2.2 1990 11 2.1 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Richard Adverse Trend: Based on the 5 year average recordable injury / illness frequency rate, an adverse trend is indicated.

SEP 15,25 & 26 i

115

50-Licen:, e Event Reports

[]

Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 40-Cumulative Licensee Event Reports

-+- Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 30-

_f 20-10-h

-M T:

0

,m,

,m, Jand9 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989 1

50-N Licensee Event Reports Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 40-Cumulative Licensee Event Reports

-+- Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 30-f 20-10-f' e-

/w

/$s

%,Q~'l,9,M M

M,d r,

m 0

i i

i Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 l

l 116 i

I

Q Licensoo Event Reports O

Personnel Errors Reported en LEHs 46 Cumulative Licenson Event Hoports Cumulative Personnel Errors Ropor1ed in LL ib 40-

--+--

31 2

30-A

[;;

f f_ [

0 N

'88

'89 "90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 91 O Inadequate Administrative Controla LERh O Inappropnate Actions. Human Error L EHa 5-8 Equipment Feiture/Maitunction LERs Q Design Def,ciency LERs M Acts of Nature, Cause Unknown Lens 3-

?-

3 5

1 y

.)

Jan91 Feb M

Apr M ay Jur.

Ju Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec9t NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERS The top graph for this indicator shows the number of Uconsee Event Reports (LERs) with report dates during Decembar 1991, the LERs attributed to personnel errors, and the cumulative total of both. The year end totals for the three previous years are also shown. The lower graph, added to the indicator in December 1991, shows the LERs by report date and Root Cause Code for each month.

In December, there were five LERs reported. Three of these LERs were attributable to person-ne! error. The LERs attributable to personnel error were: LER 9124 ESF Actuation after pulling fuses, LER 91-26 SRO Licensees without NRC physicals, and LER 91-27 Reactor Coolant Drain Tank Sampling.

There have been 32 LERs reported so f ar in 1991 and 14 of these LERs have been attributable to personnel error.

Data Source: Short/Howman (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: Bastd on an increase in the number of personnel errors reported in LERs since September, an adverse trend is indicated.

SEP 15 117

600-545 558 O Actual Division Staffing so 4

, x;p ^

Q Authorized Division Stattsng

$[Af v.

4 hkl 206 204 200-Qfgg[

=.,

l$@

khkff.

50 52 we '

m:'

i..

Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Nucina: Services STAFFING LEVEL The authorized and actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions.

Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Waszak Adverse Trend: None SEP 24

-C}- Nuclear Operations Division Turnover Rate

-A--

Productior. Engineering Division Turnover Rate 10% -

- Nuclear Services Division Turnover Rate 8%-

4, D

'~'

O C

C C

O A90 S90 090 N90 D90 J91 F91 M91 A91 Mf,1 J91 J91 A91 S91 091 N91 L,91 FERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The tumover rates for the three Divisions are calculated using only resignations : rom OPPD.

Division Turnover Rate NOD 3.1%

PED 4.8%

NSD 2.0%

Currently, the OPPD corporate turnover rate is being reported as approximately 4.0%.

This OPPD corporate turnover rate is based on the turnover rate over the last four years.

Data Source: Sor.enson/ Burke (Manager / Source)

Accountability: WaszaK Adverse Trend: None 118

o e

e,:-

w, 2

--.2.4 44h,-6,-.

__;J n

6

)

0 Totai Requaiitication Training Hours E Simulator Training Houis 0~

@ Non Requalification Training Hours E Numberof Exam Failures 50-41 40-36 36 7l

/

30-

/,

28

/.

24 24 22 N

to

'?

h 20-18

/,

'i 16

'/

II 16 jl 14 l'!

'/,

/,

12 i;

/

7, 10-

'i 8'I 9

8 ':

/

//

'/

/

/,

4 4

//

'i

'/

/

4

/.

h 2

2 h 2 hl

~

1 1

0

~

t i

i i

1 Cycle 911 Cycle 912 Cycle 913 Cycle 914 Cycle 915 Cycle 916 Cycle 917 LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING This indicator, formerly titled "SRO and RO License Examination Pass Ratio", was revised in August 1991 to more accurately reflect training department procedures.

This indicator provides information on the total number of hours of training given to each crew during each cycle. The Simulator training hours shown on the graph are a subset

. of the totaltraining hours. Non Requalification Training Hours are used for AOP/EOP verification & validation, INPO commitments, GET, Fire Br.gade, Safety Meetings, and Division Manager lunches.

Exam failures are defined as failures in the written, simulator, and Job Performance Measures (JPMs) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training.

Twenty two licensed individuals took and passed the in-house annual requalification exarn.

Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gasper / Lazar Adverse Trend: IJone SEP 68 119

_ -i D SRO Exams Administered 50-O SRO Exams Passed E RO Exams Administered O RO Exams Passed 40-30-20-T I

f t

.10-

';l j

5 S

.[

[

. Jan90 Feb

Mar Apr May Jun Jul' Aug -.Sep Oct Nov ; : Dec90

'.1990 e

L i

i.

120 F:

@ SRO Exams Administered 50-O SRo Exams eassed E RO Exams Administered 40-

- O RO Exams Passed 30-20-3 I

10-

~

.h.

7"

.i=

i i

i

.i i

i i

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May

.Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS

- This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Opera-tor (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally admir.is-tered quizzes and exams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress.

i During the month of December 1991, the_re were no internally administered SRO~or RO exams taken.

During the month of_ October 1991, seven NRC administered SRO exams were taken and all saven of these exams were passed in addition, seven NRC administered RO

- exams were taken in October and all seven of these exams were passed.

Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Gasper / Lazar Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 1

121

_... _ _ ~. _ _.... _ _ _

-4 O Hotlines initiated 35-M Hotlinas Closed

@ Hotlines Open Under 4 Weeks 30-G - Hotlines Open Over 4 Weeks 25-4 20-15-r..

10-

.E E

5-e 5

s

=

5

=

2

=

5 s

s m

0-

.i i

i i

Jan Feb Mar

. Apr May

-Jun-Jul Aug Sep Oct

-Nov

.Dec 1990 4

^

l 1-122

0 Hotlinesinitiated 35-E HotlinesClosed nes Omdue a Weeb 30-8 Hotlines Overdue > 4 Weeks 25-20-15-10-I E

5-j j

E_

E E

0 3

M 8

i 4

6 6

i i

i a

i i

Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS

' This indicator.shows the number of Hotline Training Memos that were initiated, returned for close out, overdue less than four weeks, and overdue greater tnan four weeks for the reporting month,

~

November 1991 initiated Hotlines 8

Closed Hotlines.

9 Hotlines Overdue < 4 wks.

4 Hotlines Overdue > 4 wks.

5-

' Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source) 1 Accountability: Gasper

' Adverse Trend; None 123

i t

r This page intentionally left blank.

t i

l l

124 l

4 O

l

] Other Training (1000 Hrs )

@ General Employeo Training (1000 hrs )

D Technical Support (1000 Hrs.)

O Chemistry and Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs.)

6-O Maintenance (1000 Hrs.)

E g

@ Operations g1000 Hrs.)

I 54-g

[

t5 r;;, ;

g EI gi

$m Iklk q~::~

i NN

~

fg 2-51 m

7 s

n j

O N

a b

2

=

b

~~

=

0 i

Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS This indicator displays the training instruction hours administered to the listed depart-ments for the month of October 1991.

This indicator is normally one month behind the reporting month due to the time re-quired for data collection and processing.

DEPARTMENT OCTOBER '91 NOVEMBER 91 Operations 340 433 Maintenance 432 681 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 609 224 Technical Support 202 124 General Employee Training 536 462 Other 123 120 Total 2,242 2,044 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gasper Adverse Trend: None i

125

)

. O Otner

@ GeneralEmployeeTraining

@ TechnicalSupport E-Chemisky and Radiation Protection O Maintenance g25-

@ Operations E

f20-3

$15-

...i 10-E m

FA g

. h,,

M g

2e 5-m "ll*

EE

=

==

0 Jan Feb Mar Apr - May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 O Other Training (1000 Hrs.)

@ General Employee Training (1000 hrs.)

@ TechnicalSupport(1000 Hrs.)

E Chemistry and Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs.)

30-O Maintenance (1000 Hrs.)

g25-

@ Operations (1000 Hrs.)

E_

g20-

.g j! ' ~

g g

E p

n

'g I'25 w;;

y j

lull 3

M

~

m w 5-

=

E E

=

0 i

i i

i Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

.Nov Dec90 1990 126-a-

a n

L 0 OtherTraining(1000 Hrs.)

l E _ General Employee Training (1000 hrs.)

@ Technical Support (1000 Hrs.)

E Chemistry and Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs.)

30-O Maintenance (1000 Hrs.)

25 -

@ Operations (1000 Hrs.)

$y 20-6a

$15-O o

10-

};j h[4]

o

=

"5-8 2

E Eiii w,i EE E

=

ss

=

g=

-4

=

_g 4

4 4

4 1

6 i

I i

i Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr -

May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING

}

This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training, and Other Training conducted f_or the Fort Calhoun Station.

This indicator is rnrmally one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed

. to collect and evaluate the data, y

QEPARTMENT OCTOBER '91 NOVEMBER '91 Operations.

1,151 2,063 Maintenance 952 2,819 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 1,720 497 Technical Support 1,231 426 General Employee Training 3,069 3,782 Other 415 588 Total 8.538 10,180 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gasper Adverse Trend: None 127

-- Totaloutage MW0s 1000-

-h-MW0s Ready to Work OutageMWRBacklog 800-600-

~

400-200-C 0

+

t Aug90 Sep-- Oct - Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec51 MWO PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) that have been approved for inclusion in the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage and the number of MWOs that are ready for_ work (parts staged, procedures approv4 and paperwork ready for field use). Also included is the number of outage related ':aintenance Work Requests (MWRs) which have been identified for the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage, but have not yet been co_nverted to MWOs. Approximately 3000 Maintenance Work Orders were com-

- pleted during each of the previous two refueling outages.

There were 899 total outage VVOs approved as of 10t '/91 with 661 of these Ready-to-Work and a backlog of 6 MWRs.

Additional data points will be added to his indicator as infortration becomes available.

Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Johansen Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 l

-128

=

O Total Emergent MWOs O Emergent MWOs Ready to Work 3 Emergent Outage MWR Backlog 200-182 18n-

"3 d l @,lt f & a mggligg 160-

).h h

140-

[

Mhg 120-100-d g

80-JA 60-45 40-f.

//

,,3,,, y,3,,,,

i',(h/ 'hhhhhhbN:,_

_ g,g,ggrg;q 20-

?

d"^

11

% s; ; ya.? =.g og, p~///////////,7,'.

a r /////,t,'/,

v December 1991 9

1 EMERGENT MWO PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE)

Outage related Maintenance Work Requests / Maintenance Work Orders (MWRs/MWOs) initiated after the Ou a Scope Freeze date (10/23/91) are identified as Emergent Work. This indicator s.ows the total number of Emergent MWOs that have been ap-proved for inclucion in the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage and the number that are ready for work (parts staged, procedures approved, and paperwork ready for field use). Also included is the number of outage related Emergent MWRs which have been identified for the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage, but have not yet been converted to MWOs. Approxi.

mately 3000 Maintenance Work Orders were completed during each of the previous two refueling outages.

At the end of the r Mrting month, there were 182 emergent outage MWOs with 45 of these Ready to r A and a backlog of 11 MWRd.

Additional data points will be added to this indicator as infoimation becomes available.

Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Johansen Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 129

Total Ostage Mad:fications -

Lbds With Planning Domment Approved

-O-Abds With Final Desgn Approved 40-

~+- Mods With Construction Package Approved w

30-6 20-10-h 0

0 0

0 Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 91 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 14 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING This indicator shows the status of modifications approved for completion during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available.

Of the 33 total outage modifications, one is in the process of being canceled: MR FC-89 009,"GE MAC Power Supply Replacement".

Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gambhir/Phelps, Faulhaber Adverse Trond: None SEP 31 130

50 -

Total 0 stage Prejects Projects wth Prehminary Schedes Gubmsted 43_

-+- Proje:ts wth Detaisd Schedules Submhted 30-

!, v, c, -

(

A

/

Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov De:91 s

OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the status cf the projects which are iii the scope of the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. Outage relatec project schaduling is now 100% complete. There are currently 25 approved outag9 projects.

Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available.

Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Boughter Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 131

Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours 12 -

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal C

h

.6

~

---C O

O-0 O

O O

O O -~O 1

r g6-

[

w _

~

m 13-a h

0-i i

i Jan89 Feb Mar Apr May Ju i Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec89 1989 m

1 Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 9_-

C O

O O

g 81

.6g6-a E

o 8

$3-

__\\

~

E

~

N

.9 5

.9>

0 i

i i

i Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 132

Violations por 1000 Inspection Hours 9,

-O-Fort Calhoun Goat

{

GWD

=

56-y N

o fh 3.7 h

w m

t h',h!

'd a

Nm c

c

--c c

-c c

c o-c c

a gf gf j

N-m n

0-1 4

I I

I i

i i

i I

4 i

i i

1 1

'88

'89

'90 Dec00 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per 1000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data.

The violations per 1000 inspection hours indicator was reported as.084 for the twelve months from December 1,1990 through November 30,1991.

The For1 Calhoun Goalis 1.6 violations per 1000 inspection hours for 1991.

Data Source: Shon/Howman (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Short Adverse Trend: None 133

W ${ M 5 This page intentionally left blank. 'lliis indicator did not exist prior to 1991.

134

O Violations per 10')0 inspection Hours (12 month Period)

E 'Solations por 1000 Inspection Hours (1991 Only) 4 e-8 I

g 3-

~

? 47 2.51

[ 2-3,73 1.65 1.65 1.

1 56 E

1.48 146 1.47 0

i i

Fort Cooper River Commanche Wolf Arkansas South Waterford Calhoun Bend Peak Crook One Texas COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV PLANTS This indicator provides a comparison of violations per 1000 inspection hours amogg Region IV nuclear power plants. The data is compiled for a twelve month period M m December 1,1990 to Ncvember 30,1991 and for the calendar year 1991 only.

' i' g'

The For1 Calhoun goal for 1991 is 1.6 violations per 1000 inspection hot 's.

t 1

Data Source: Short/Howman (Mariager/ Source;.

i Accountability: Short Adverse Trond: None O

o 135 I

75-O Number of Votatens During the Last 12 Months O Number of NCVs During the Last 12 Months 50- 47 41 41 b

34 34 n

3 27 25-gg 20 21 21 21 20 16 16 14 14 14 gg g

12 12 n

n:

n a

p~

~

.{k:

[

J i

y

.h >

L

.- cl W

9.1 0-i i

i i

9 Ja190 Feti Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 7

1990 f

136

75-0 Nurnber of Violations During the Last 12 Months O Number of NCVs During the Last 12 Months 50-25-3 15 12 g3 gg l7 7 7

7 7

~

---5 5

5 5

4 I

n$

', 4

% 4 0

3 i

i i

Doc 90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVE-MONTH RUNNING TOTAL)

The Cumulative Violations and Non Cited Violations (NCVs) indicator shows the cumu-lative umber of violations and the cumulative number of NCVs for the last twelve months.

This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with col!ecting and processing the data for this indicaint.

Data Source: Short/Howman (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Short Adverse Trond: None 137

O Outstanding CAR'c That Are Modifcation Related

-A-Outstanding CAR's > Six Months Old Total Outstanding CAR's 200-N.

150-100-i_

50-k-.

>_--__ m,-

3 0

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 O

Outstanding CAR's That Are Modifcation Rotated

-A--

Outstanding CAR's > Six Months Old Total Outstanding CAR's 200-150-

\\

100-A A

--1"'A A

50-

=

I i

0 Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Sep Oct Nov Dec90 1990 1

133

O Outstanding CARS That Are Modifcation Related

-A-Outstanding CARS > Six Months Old al OWstan6ng CARS 200-150-100-A

-A AM'%A

~

0-Jan9)

Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CARS),

the number of outstanding CARS that are greater than six months old, and the number of ou'. standing CARS that are modification related.

At the end of December 1991, there were 71 outstanding CARS,43 CARS that were greater than six months old, and 3 CARS that were modification related.

Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Andrews/Gambhir/ Gates Adverse Trend: None i

t 139 h

~

-[}- NOD Overdue CAR's NOD CAR's With Extensions Granted 15-10-A N

A 0

D-m m

w Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90

~

-[}- PED Overdue CAR's

-a-PED CAR's With Extensions Granted 15-10-5-

N 0-O-

m Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90

~

-O-Other Overdue CAR's

--b-Other CAR's With Extensions Granted 15-10-5-

0 0

Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec00 140 i

20-r}- NOD Overdue CARS

'~

NOD CARS Wah Extensions Granted 10-be y

O-C O

q-o m

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 3v-

{-}--

PED Overduc CARS 25-20 -

PED C ARs Wdh Extensions Granted 15-b 10-N I'

O

~ ~

O 0

w Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 6-5-

--CJ-Other Overdue CARS

~

Other CARS Wdh Extensions Granttd 3-2-

U O

C i

i Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the number of overdue CARS and the liumber of CARS which received extensions broken down by organization.

overdueEAlls Overdue CARS October '91 November '91 December '91 NOD 0

0 0

PED 0

0 2

Others 0

0 0

Total 0

0 2

Extended CARS Extended CARS October '91 November '91 December '91 NOD 3

2 4

PED 4

4 5

Otners 2

0 3

Total 9

6 12 Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Andrews/Gambhir/ Gates Adverse Tread: None 141 1

~

1990 SALP Funct.

Area CARS Signit. CARS NRC Viola.

LERs A) Plant Operations 62 0

2 10 B) Radolog 28 2

0 0

Controit C) Maint/Survell, 180 8

6 4

D) Emergency 7

0 3

0 Preparodness E) Security 26 0

5 3

F) Engr / Tect 172 5

3 12 Suppori 29 0

0 0

G) Safety Assess',

Qual. Verif H) Other 1

0 o

o Total 505 15 19 29 1991 SALP Funct.

Area CARS Siontf CARS NRC Viola.

LERs A) Plant Operations 30(1) 1 1

6(1)

B) Radolog. Controls 12 (1) 0 2

0 C) Maint/Survell, 66(2) 0 1

9 (2)

D) Ernergency 16 0

0 0

Preparednest E) Security b

0 1

3 F) Engr / Tech Suppori 93(4) 3 1

12(2)

G) Safety Assess; 27 (1) i 1

2 oual. Verif, H) Othei 0

0 0

0 Tota' 249 (9) 5 7

32 (5)

Note: ( ) indicate value for the reporting month.

CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIFICANT CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs. LERs REPORTED The above matrix shows the number of Corrective /setion Reports (CARS) issued by the Nuclear Services Division (NSD) vs. the number of Significant CARS issued by NSD vs.

the number of violations issued by the 14RC for the Fort Calhoun Station in 1990 and 1991. Included in this table is the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) identified by the Station each year. The number of NRC violations reported is one rnonth behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the violations.

Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Short/Howman (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Andrews/Gambhir/ Gates Adverse Trend: None SEP 15,20,21 142

l 1

PERFORMAIJCE ItJDICATOR DEFitJITIOtJS AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK OR.

crator has been estabhshed based upon the 1990 indut DERS try med.an value provided t>y INPO inis indtostor tracks the total numter of outstanding cor-

ective non-outage Maintenance Work Orders at the Fort DECONT AMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED Cathoun Staton versus their age m months.

AREA lhe percentage of the Radiaton Controlled Area, which AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS includes the aunihary budding, the radnatte budding, and This mdicator is dehned as the percentage of open, nrn.

areas of the C HP budding, that is decontaminated bas ed outage, maintenance work orders that are en hold aw.A on the lutal square footage lhis andcator tracks perior-ing parts, to the total number of open, non outage, mein-mance for SEP

54 tenance work ordees.

DISADLING INJURY f REOUENCY RATE (LOST TIME AUXlLIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURF OUTSIDE ACCIDENT RATE)

STAT 10H LIMITS This indicator is dehned as the number of actdents for The cumulative hours that the Component Cochng Water all utdny personnel permanentry assigned to the station, system is outside the station chemistry i mrt. 'ihe hours involving days away from work per P00,000 man hours are accumulated from the fi st sample exceeding the Omn worked (100 man-years) This does not include contrac-untd addnonal samphng shows the parameter to te bact tot personnel lhis indicato' tracks personnel perior-within kmris.

mance for SEP 825 & 06 CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIFICANT CARS vs. NRC VIO-DOCUMENT REVIEN (DIENNI AL)

LAT10NS vs. LERs REPORTED The Document Renew indicatot shows the number of Pro, des a comparison of CARS issued, NRC volations, documents revwwed, the number of documents sched-and LERs reported. Th's indicator tracts periormance for vled for revew, and the number of document reviews SE P si$,20. & 21, that are overdue for the togorting month A document review is considered overdue if the review is not com.

CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE piele wnhin 6 months of the assigned due date. This indi-Compares the Fort Calhoun check valve f ailure rate to calor trads periormance for SEP 846.

the industry check valve f ailure rate (tailures per 1 millon component hours) The data for the industrv f aiture rate EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIADlL-is three months behind the P1 Report repor ng month.

ITY This indicator tracks periormance for SEP 843 This indcator shows the numter of f adures that we's reported during the 'ast ?O,50, and 100 emergency die-COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV solgenerator demands at the Fort Calhoun Staton. Also PLANTS shown are trigger values which correlate to a high level Provdes data on volabons per 1000 inspecton hou's for of conf donce that a unit's diesel generators have ob-Regon IV nuclear power plants.

tained a rehabihty of g' eater than or equal to 95*4 when the demand Iailures are less than the togger values CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE DACKLOG GREATER 1)Numtme of Start Demands: All vahd and inadvertent THAN 3 MONTHS OLD start demands, including all start only demands and all The percentage of total outstanding corrective mainte-star 1 demands that are followed by load run demands, nance items, not requiring an outage,'5at are greater whether by automatic or manualinit<aton A sta t onty than three months old at the end of the perod reported.

demand is a demand in which the emergency generator is staned, but no attempt is made to load the generator.

CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS & NON CITED VIOLA-

2) Number of Start Failures' Any f adure within the emer.

T10NS (12 MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) gency generator system that prevents the generator from The cumulatr<e number of violatons and Nan Cned Vo-achieving specihed frequency and voftage is classited as latons for the last 12 months.

a vahd start f ailure. This includes any condition identihed in the course of maintenance inspectons (wrth the emer-DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT gency generator in standby mode) that definitely would This indicator shows tne daily core thermal output as have resutted in a star 1 tadure ft a demand had occurred measured ' rom computer pent XC105 On thermal mega-

3) Number of Load Run Demands: For a vahd load.run watts) The 1500 MW Toth Spec hmn. and the unmet demand to be counted the load run attempt must meet porten el the 1495 MW FCS cady goa! for the reporting one or more of the iallowing crnena:

month are also shown.

A)A loao run of any duraton that results from a real auto-mate or manualinitiaton.

DIESEL GEllERATOR UN AVAILABILITY B) A load-run test to satisty the plant's load and duraton This indicator ormidas monthly data on the number of as stated in each test's specibcations hwes of diose generator planned and unplanned un-C)Other special tests in which the emergency generator avadabihty. The Fort Calhoun goaltot the second half of is erpected to be operated for at least one hour while 1991 for the number of unavaliable nours por d.esel gen-load 4d with at least 60% of its design k2ad 143 l

PERFORMAllCE IIJDICATOR DEFitJITIOl4S (cont'd)

4) Number of Loa $Run Failures: A load run f ailure EOulVALENT AVAILADILITY FACTOR should tw counted for any reason in whch the emer.

This indcator is defined as the ratio of gross available gancy generator does not pd up bad and tur' as pre-generaton to gross maximum generaton. empressed as deted. Failures are counted durirg any vahd bad.run a percentage. Available generaton as the energy that can demands.

be produced ff the Unit is operated at the mastmum 5)Exceptons: Unsuccessful attempts to start or bad-run power level permitted by equipment and regulatory limi-should not be counted as vald demands or failures when tatons. Matimum generatan is the energy that can be they can be attributed to any of the following:

produced by a unft in a given perod d operated continu.

A)Sputous trips that would be bypassed in the event of l

out y at manimum capactry.

an emergency.

D)Mafuncton of equipment that is rot required during an EXPEDITED PURCHASES emergency, The percentage of expedited purchases which occurred C)lntentional terminaton of a test because ci abnormal dunng the reporting rnonth compared to the total number conditic ns that would not have resutled in major diesel of purchase orders generated.

generator damage or repair.

D) Malfunctions or operating errors wheh would have not FORCED OUTAGE RATE prevented the emergency generator from being restarted This indcator is defined as the percentage of time that and brought to bad within a few minutes, the unft was unavailable due to forced events compared E)A failure to start because a porton of the starting sys-to the time planned for elect" cal genef aton Forced tem was disabled for test purpose, if followed by a suc-events are f ailures or other unplanned conditons that cessfut start with the starting system in its normal abgn-require removing the unft from service before the end of ment.

the next weekend. Forced events include *tartup f ailures Each emergency Generator failure that results in the gen-And events initiated while the unit is in reserve Shutdown orator being declared inoperable shouki be munted as (i s., the unit is available but not in service),

one demand and one failure. Expbrator) tests during corrective maintenance and the succersf ultest that foi-FUEL RELI ABILITY INDICATOR bws repair to verify operabihty should r.nl be counted as This sodcator is defined as the steady state primary cool-demands or Iailures when the EDG has not been de-ant I 131 acwery, corrected for the tramp vranium contn.

clared operable again.

buton and normahred to a common punfcaton rate. Tramp utanium is fuel which has been deposited on EMER3ENT MW9 PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 14 reactor core internals from prevous defective fuel or is REFUELING OUTAGE) prennt on the turiate of fuel elements from the manu.

Outage related Maintenance Work RequestsMainte-f actonng process. Steady state is dehned as continuous rance Work Ord rs (MWRs'MWOs) initiated after tne operation for at Isast three days at a power level that Ovtage Scope Freeze Date (10Wg1),

does not vary more than 4 or 5% Plants should collect data for this indicator at a pawer level above 85%, when ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) BREAK.

possible. Plants that dd not operate at steady state DOWN power above 85% should collect data for this indcator at This indcator breaks down the number of Engineenng the highest Fteady stata power level attained during the Change No'ces (ECNs)that are assigned to Design month.

Engineenng Nuclear (DEN), System Engineenng, and The density correcton lador is the ratio of the specific Maintenance. The graphs provde data on ECN f acihty volume of coolant at the RCS operating terrFature Changes open, ECN Substitute Replacement Parts (540 degrees F, Vf. 0 02146) drvded by the :,pecific open, and ECN Document Changes oren. This indcator volume of coolant at normalletdown temperature (120 tracks performance for SEP #62, degrees F at outlet of the totdown coohng heat ex-changer,Vf. 0 016204), whch results in a donsrty cor-ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS recton factor for FCS equal to 1.32.

The number of ECNs that were opened ECNs that were completed, and open backlog ECNs awarting completion GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DIS-by DEN for the reporting month. This andcator tracks per-CHARGED TO Tite ENVIRONMENT formance for SEP a62.

This indicator displays the total number of Curies of all naseous radioactive nucides released from FCS EOUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 100g CF.11b CAL HOURS GROSS HEAT RATE Equipment forced outages per 1000 crtical hours is the Gross heat rate is dehned as the ratio of total thermal inverse of the mean time between forced outages energy in Br?.ish Thermal Units (BTV) produced by the caused by equipmant failures. The mean time is squal to reactor to the total gross electrical energy produced try the number of hours the reactor is crit cat in a perod the generator in kilowatt hours (KWH).

(1000 hours0.0116 days 0.278 hours 0.00165 weeks 3.805e-4 months ) drvded by the number of forced outages caused by equipment f ailures in that perod.

144

l PERFORMANCE li4DICATOR DEFli41TIOlJS (Cont'd)

HA7.ARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED The total amount (in Kilograrns) of nomhalogonated hu-LOGG A BL EJRE PORT AD LE INCIDENT S (SE CURITY) ardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other The total number of sacurity tncidents for the re;orting haza'dous waste produced by FCS each month.

month depicto)in 1wo graphs 1his indicator tracks secu-nty performance for SE Ps58 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS The number of l#thne Training Memos (HTM) that are MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS inniated, closed, and overdue less or greater than 4 The number of Nuclear Pk.nt Recabiiny Data System weeks for the indicated month. A HTM is a training docu-(NPROS) components wnh mote than 1 f ailure and the mont sent out for immed4 ate revi6w, The HIM should be number of NPRDS components with more than 2 failures reviewed and sgned within 5 days of receipt of the HTM dunng the last 12 months HOURS CHEMISTRY IS OUTS!DE OWMERS GROUP MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER D ACKLOG GUIDELINES lhe number of corrective noncutage mamtenance worA Total hours for 13 soonnda y $de chemistry paramete's orders that remain open at the end of the reportmg exceeding gudehnes vuring power operaton Power month This indcator was added to the Pl Report to operation as defined as greate' than 30% power. T he 13 trend open corrective non outage maintenance work en parameters tracked are steam generator pH, caton con-ders as stated in SEP #36 ductigny, boron sitca, chloride, sulf ate, sodium, f eud n a-ter pH, dissolved oxygen, hydrazine, iron, copper. and MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER DREAKDOWN condensato pump dtscharge dissolved orygen.

This indicator is a breakdown of correctwo non-outage monitenance worn orders by several categories that re-IN UNE CHEMISTRY INST 110MENTS OUT OF SER.

main open at the end of the reportN month 1his indca-VICE tor tracks maintenance periormance for SEP 836 Total number of in ime chemistry instruments that are out of.servce in the Secondary System and the Post MAINTENANCE OVERTIME Accident Sampling System (PASS)

The % of overtime houts compa'ed to normal hours for maintenance This includes OPPD persenet ar, well as INVENTORY ACCURACY contrac1 personnel.

The percentage of line items that are counted each month by the warehouse which need count adjustments.

MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING The percent of matenat requests (MRs) for it sues with INVOICE DREAKDCWN their request date the same as their need date compared The number of invoices that are on hold due to theft life, to the total number of MRs.

COE, and miscellareous reasons, MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE UCENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS The total maximum amount of radiatsu received by an This mdicator shows the number of SRO andtor RO qui 2-ind%Jual po' son wo king at f CS on a monthly, qua'tudy, tes and exams that a:e administered and passed each and annual bns month. This indicator tracks training performance for SEP 868.

MWO OVERALL STATUS (CYCLE 13 REFUELING OUTAGE)

LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAIN-The total number of Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs)

ING that have been wntten for comp;eton during the Cycle 14 The total number 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months of training given to each crew Refueling Outage. MWOS which are written atte' the start during each cycle. Also provdet ar6 the simulator train-of the Refueling Outage will be labe:ed Emergent MWOs.

ing hours (which are a subset of the total training hours),

Also shcwn is the number of MWRs which Itave been the number of non requalt cation traming hours and the identified for the Cycle 14 Refuehng Outage, but have f

number of exam f ailures. This indicator tracks training not yet been converted to MWOs This indicatot tracks pedormance for SEP 868.

periormance for SEP #31.

LIOUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE OEING DISCHARGED NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS TO THE ENVIRONMENT The number of radiologcal hot spots which have been This indmator dit, plays the volume of liquid radioactive identdied and documented to exist at FCS at the end of wasto released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks, the reporting month. A hot spot is a smalllocal;ted to include releases through the plant blowdown it radio-source of rad.aton A hot spot occurs when the contact active nucidos are detected in the blowdown system.

dose rate of an item is at least 5 times the General Area The curies f rom all releases f rom FCS to the Mesouri dose rate and the nem's dose rate is equal to or greater River are also shown.

than 100 mrem' hour.

145

)

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITICNS (Cont'd)

NUMBER OF NPRDS MULTIPLE FAfLURES OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE RE-The number of NPRDS toportable f ail;tes ovwr the OVESTS (EARS) proceeding eghteen months sorted by co'rponent I's total number of open E ARs and the numbar ed open manufacturer and model number.

EARS broken down by their age in months. This andcator NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEM (NPPDS) FAILURE REPORTS SUBMITTED OUTSTANDING MDDirlCAT10NS The data plotted is the total number of NPRDS compo-The number of Modtfcat on Requests (MRs)in any state nu nt f ailures (confirmed and possitds) and the number of t, tween the issuance of a Modifcaton Number and the conbrmed NPRDS component failures. The total number completon of the drawing update.

of NPRDS comronent failures are based on the number 1)rorm FC 1133 Backbgrin Progrus This number rep.

1 of 14 dure reports that have been sent to the Instrtute of Nucleat Power Operations (INPO). Confirmed NPRDS resents modifcaton requests that have not been plant approved during the reporting month.

component tailures are based upon f ailure reports that 2)Modifcation Requests Doing Reviewed. This category 1 ave been accepted by INPO. Possible NPRDS compo-includes:

nont failures are based upon f ailure reports that are still A ) Mod featon Requests that are not yet renewed.

under review by INPO, NPRDS is a utihty industry users 0 )Modifcaten Requests being revwwed by the Nuclear group program which has been puthned by INPO and projects Review Committee (NPRC) implemented at FCS.

C )Modifcaton Requests being reveewed by the Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC, NUMBER OF OUT.0F SERVICE CONTROL ROOM These Modificaton Roquests may be reviewed several INSTRUMENTS times before they are approved for accomphshment or A contro) room instrument that cannot perform as t'esgn cancelled. Some of these Modifcaton Requuts are re-functon is considered as out of service. A control room turned to Engineinng for more infortnation, some ap-instrument which has h;d a Maintenance Work Ord*'

proved for eva!uaton, some approved for study, and (MWO) wrtrten for it and has not been repaired Y,no some approved for planning. Once planning is completed end of the reporting perod is considered out4 arvice and the scope of the work n clearly defined, these Mode and will be counted. lhe duraton of the out# WWc ficaton Requests may be approved for accomphshment conditon is not considered. Computer CRTs are not von-wnh a year assigned for constructen or they rnay be can-sideret. as controt room instruments.

celled Allof these ddierent puses require 7eview.

3) Design Engineenng Backlog'in Piogress Nuclear NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN Planning has assigned a year in which construction will LERS be completed and desgn work may ve in progress.

The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) attributed 4)Constructon Backlogin P. ogress. The Construction to personnel error on the orlginal Lf.R submntal. This Package has been issued or construction has begun but indcator trends personnel performance for SEP #15 the modificaton has not been accepted by the System Acceptance Committee (S AC).

NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RE-5)Desgn Engineering Update Backlog'In Progress PED SULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS Ms received tre undacat.on Completon Report but th9 The number of Surveillance lests (STs) that result in drawings have nut been updated.

Licensee Event Reports (LERs) during the reportin9 The above mentoned outstanding modifcatons do not month. This indicator tracks missed STs for SEP #60 &

include moddcatons whth are proposed for caicella-61.

ton.

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 14 The year. to-date budget compared to the actual expen.

REFUELING OUTAGE) enures for Operations and Maintenance departments.

The number of projects which affect the scope of the Cycle 14 Refuehng Outage and the number of prn;ects OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS for which dotarled schedules have been submitted. Thit This indicator displays the total number of outstanding indcator tracks performance for SEP a31 Corrective Action Reports (CARS), the number of CARS that are older than six months and the number of modife-caton teltted CARS.

l 146

PERFORMAtJCE ltJDICATOR DEFitJITIOt4S (Cont'd)

OVERPUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRESS OF CYCLE 14 OUTAGE I..rDIFICATION REPORTS PLANNING 1he numac! of overdue Corrective Action Reports lhe number of mccficat ons approvW for planning (to (CARS) and the number of CAR 4 whch rece'ved enten-determino f easibilny) f or completion during the Cycle 14 t,ons broken down by organtratea for the last 6 months Refuehng Outage This edcator tracks p.riormance for SEP #31.

PENCD4T OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTE-NANCE ACTICTIES R ADIOLOGICAL WORK PRAC11CES PROGR AM The % of the number t'1 completec maintenance act4vF 1he number of identthod goor radologic 11 work pract(es ties as compared to the number of schWuled mainte-(PRWP) for the reporting month This iridicator tracks nance activttes each wSek. This % is shown for each radological work performance for SEP #52.

maintenance cra't Maintenance activn'es include MWRs.

MWOs. STs, PMOs cskbratons, ed other mxelia-RATIO DF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTEN ANCE neous acbvtties 1%e ladcators tra:A Maintenance per-The f ato of preventive maintenance (including surveil.

formance to SF.P #33.

lance testing and cabbraton procedures) to the sum of nonoutage corrective maintonance and preventive main PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULA*

tenance completed o$er the reporting porod 1he ratio.

TIVE) expressed as a percentage,is catutated based on man.

Collective radiaton esposvre is the total enterns' whole-hours This indicator tracks preventive rnaintenance ac-bc dy dose receiveo by ali tasttw personnel (including tetses for SEP 841.

contractors and visnorsi dunng a time penod, as mes-sured by the thermolumhescent dosameter (TLD). Col-RECORDADLE INJURY CASES FREQUENCY RA1E lective radiation expeture is reported in units of man-(RECORDADLE INJURY RATE) rom.1h;c indo ator tracks raitiological work performance lhe number of injuries requiring more than normal first for SEP e56 a d per 200.000 man hours worked This andcator frends personnet performance for SEP 815. 25 & 26.

PERSONNEL TURNOVI R RATE The rato t> tac n;mber of turnovert to avery empey-SECONDARY S(STEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE ment. A tumpe< c a vacancy created by voluntary resg. INDEX nation from the corr %ny. Retirement, deatn, terminaton. The Chemistry ' stformance inden (CPI) is a calculaton transVrs within the company, and part time employees based on the o' co ntraton of hy impurit es in the sec-are not considered in 'urnover.

ondary side of ta olant. These key impurn!ss are the m6st likely cause # deteroraton of the steam genera-PREVENT 1% E MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE tors. The cheat Stry parameters ve reported only for the This !ndicator is defined as the % of preveritive rnainte-penod of tirr.4 0 *ntet than 30 percent power.

nana items in the month that were not completed by the The CPlis GJ "d using the fotbwing eQuaton' cpl =

fa:hduled date plus a grace pericd oqual to 25 % of the (Ka9 B) + (I)

' K,/10)) r 3 where the fol6owing bre (0

Sc* uduled intervat This indcator tracks preentive main-monthly ave' a e

verage blowdown cation herag, bbwdown sodium concen, toi.ance erynies for SEP #41.

conductmt<

tration. O, Don.ge condent ale pump discharje dis-

< rv PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY % OF HOURS OUT solved or cantrat,on.

OF UMli TN % of hours out of hmit are for sin primary chemntry SECU'4f INCIDD41S DREAKDOWN o

g.

parr. meters divided by the total number of hours possible The rvnbt r D! Secer:tp bggat@repc, table incidents is for the month The key parameters used are: Lithium.

brokinn dowd erto the %Ik)wng categories:

Chlorids, Hydrogen, Dissohted Oxygen. Fluonde, and

1) t.censee Dngnated Vehcies (LDVs). Incidents re-Susper.ded Sohds. EPRiiimits are used.

la j to the me of LDVs, e g, keys le?t in the vehicle, bt. of boys. or failure to retuin key S.

PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS

2) heunty usges Incidents associated with improper (MAINTENANCE) uw and ha*Jhng of security badges. Incidents include The number of identliiod inedents concerning mainte-security ba j es that are lost, taken ot,,1 of the protected g

nance procedural problems, the number of closed irs area, o 1 of control on t.ne, or inadvenently destroyed or related to the use of procedures (includes the number of brokd closed tRs caused by procedural noncomphance), and

3) Acces: L ontrol and Authoniaton Administrative and the number of closed procedural noncomphance irs proc edva! Irrors asscciated with the use of the card-This indcator trends personnet periormance for SEP access sy:%m such as tadgaung. incorrect securny

15,41 & 44.

badge isso % and improper escon procedures. This also includet ir 'icents that were caused by mcorrect access authonzalin information ente *ed into the secunty sys-tem computer 147

1 I

l PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd)

4) Security Key Control incdonts involving Securry key control, e g, bs.t Securrty b oys. Security keys removed STOCKOUT RATE from site, of f ailure to return Swcurity keys. T his type of The total number of Pek Tckets that were generated event does not reft.act incidents concerning LOV keys.

dunng the reporting month and the total number of t'ck This indicator tracks iocunty p;rformance for SEP #5B Tckets that were generated dunng the reporting month when the amount of parts req.ested is equalto or less SECURITY ShTEM FAILURES than the minimum stocking level and parts are not avail-Incdonts involving tarm systemIailures, CCTV1ailures, able.

security computer IaNres. *,earch equipment Iailures, door hardware f ailures snd card reader failures. These TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS system f ailures are furthu r;ategorged as follows:

The number of temporary mechancal and electrical con-

1) Alarm System Failure tietecton system events in-figuratons to the plant's systems.

volving f alse! nuisance alarms and mechan cal f ailures.

1)lemporary configuratons are defined as electrcal

2) Alarm System Environmental Failures Degradatons jumpers, electreal blocks, mechancal jumpers, or me-to detecton system periormance as a resutt of environ-ch anical blocks whch are installed in the pl ant oporating montal condit,ons (i.e, rain, snow, frost).

Systems and ate not shown on the latest revison of the 3)CCTV Failures Meenanical f ailures to all CCTV hard-PalD, schematie, connecton. wiring, of flow diagrams.

ware components.

2) Jumpers and blocAs whch are installed for Surveil-4)CCTV Environmental Failu'es. Degradations to CCTV lance lests. Maintenanct Procedures, Calibraton Pro-performance as a result of anvironmental cottons (i e.,

ceduies, Special Procedures, or Operating Procedures rain, snow, frost,109, sunspots, chade).

see not considered as temporvy modifcatecns unless the

5) Secunty Computer Failures. Failure of the mutti-Jumper or bbek rsmainti in place after the test or proco-plexer, central processing unit, and other computer hard-dure is complete. Jumpers and blocks installed in test or ware and software. This category coes not include sott-lab instruments are not considered as temporary mod 6 ware problems caused by operator error in uting the catons.

Software.

3)Scattolding is not considered a temporary modihcaton.

0) Search Equipment Fai'uras Failures of x ray, metal, Jumpers and blocks whch are installed and Icr which of explostve det0ctors and other equipment used to MRs have been submmed will be considered as tempo-search for cont'aband. This also includes incidents rary modif catons untilfinal resoluton of the MR and the where the search equipment is found defective or dd not jumper or bbek is removed or is permanently recolded functon 'operty during testing =

on the drawings This indcator tracks tempnra y mod 6-

7) Door Hardware Fa9ures. Failure of the door alarrt catons for SEP #02 & 71.

and door hardware such as latches, electre strikes, doorknobs, locks, etc.

TOTAL INSTRUCT 1ON HOURS

8) Card Reader Failures Incidents caused by mechani.

The total number and department breakdown of training cat breakdown of card readers, but not improper use of irstrudon hours administered by the Trainine Nnter.

the card readers. (See Access Control and Authon2ation) This indicator tracks securrty performance TOTAL HOURS OF STULJT TRAINING for SEP #58.

The total number of student hours o raining for Opero tons, Maintenance, Chemistry /Radiaton Protecton, SPARE PARTSISSUED Technical Support, General Employee Train.

nd The dollar value of the spare parts issued for FCS dunng Other Training conducted for FCS.

the reporting period.

TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINAT10NS STAFFING LEVEL Reportable skin and clothing contaminatons atove The ectual staffing level and the authorized staffing level background levels greater than 5000 dpm/100 cm for the Nuclear Operatons Division, the Producton Engi-squared This andcator trends personnel periormance for neering Divison, and the Nuclear Services Divison. This SEP #15 & 54.

Indcator tracks performanca, for SEP 824.

STATION NET GENERAT10N The not generaton (sum) produced by the FCS dunng the reporting month.

148

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd)

UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOH The ratio of the available energy gerieration over a given time pered to the referonce energy generaten over the name time perod, expressed as a percentage.

UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL This indcator is defined as the fr 1ber of unplanned automatic eerams (teactor protecton system logic actuatons) that occur while the reactor is critut The indcator is furthet defined as follows:

i

1) Unplanned means that the scram was tot part of a planned test or evolution.

l

2) Scram means the automate shutdown of the teactor by a rapid inserton of all comrol rods that is caused by actua-ton of the teactor protoction system. The scram signal may have resutted from exceeding a setpomt or may have been sputcus.

3) Automate means that the innial signal that caused actuaton of the teactor protection system logic was provided from one of the sensors monnoring plant parametets and conditons, father than the manual scram switches (or pushbuttor 4)in the main control room.

4)Crnicaltneans that during the steady state condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the effective multiplcaton factor (g) was equal to one.

t UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS + (INPO DEriNITION)

[

This indicator is defined as the sum of the following safety system actuations:

1)The number of unplanned Emergency Core Coohng System (ECCS) actuatons that fesult from reaching an ECCS 6

actuation setpoint or from a sputious/ inadvertent ECCS sgnal

- 2)The number of unplanned emergency AC power system actuatons that result from a loss of power to a safeguards i

bus. An unplanned safety system actuaton occurs when an actuaton setpoint for a safety system la teached or when a sputous or inadvertent signal is generated (ECCS only), and major equipment in the system is actuated.

Unplanned means that the system actuaton was not part of a planned test or evolution. The ECCS actuatons to be counted are actuatons of the high pressure injection system, the low pretsure injection system, of the safety injact6on

tanks, t

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS(NRC DEFINITION)

The number of safety system actuations which include (Rak) the Hgh Pressure Safety injecten System, the Low r

Pressure Safety injection System, the Safety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diese1 Generators. The NRC clas-sifcation of safety system actuations it cludes actuations when major equipment is operated And when the logc sys-tems for the above safety Aystems are challenged.

VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTlON HOURS This indicator is defined as the number of violations sited in NRC inspecton reports for FCS per 1000 NRC intpection hours The violations are reported in the year that the inspection was actually performed and not bat.ed on when the inspecton report is received. The hours reported for each inspection report are used as the inspecton hours.

VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOUD RADIOACTIVE V, ASTE This indmator is defined as the volume of low level sohd radcactive waste actually shipped for burial. This indcator also shows the volume of low level radoactive waste which is in temporary storage, the amount of radcactive oil that has been shipped off stte for processing, and the volume of sohd dry radoactive waste which has been shipped off-site for processirg. Low level sokd radoactive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms generated as a result of nuclear power plant operaton and maintenanca. Dry radioactive waste includos contaminated tags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other material to be disposed of at a low level radcactive waste disposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low level re-fers to all radcactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by product of spent fuel processing. This indicator tracks rado-

)

logical work performance for SEP e54c k

p L

t 149 g

-a...-

m,

.m.

-_-_--.-..__.-,a.~.

.. w~.-

i SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX The pumose of the Safely Enhancement Program (CEP) Performance indicators index is to last perior.

mance Indicators related to SEP llems with parameters that can be trended SEP Reference Number 15 Eggg increase HPES and IR Actountability Through Uce of Performancc' Indicators Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Malntenance)........................................ 51 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations................................................................ 81 Recordable injury Cases Frequency Rate...........

m.........

........................-.........115 Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs................................................................117 CARS issued vs Significant CARS issueu vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported..........142 SEP Reference Number 20 Quality Audits and Surveillance Programs are Evaluated, improved in Depth and Strengthened CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations istned vs LER$ Repor1ed...........142 SEP Reference Number 21 1

Develop and Conduct Safety System Functional Inspect 6ons CAR $ issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported........142 SEP Reference NumK. M Complete Staff Studies Statfiry Level

....................a.....................................,............

,,............U8 SEP Reference Number 25 Training Program for Managers and Supervisors implemented Disabling injury /Illne ss Frequency Rate...............................................................,.... 25 t

Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate......................................,..... 1 1 5 SEP Reference Number PB

[

Evaluate and implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice RegJirements Disabling injury /11tnest Frequency Rate......................................................... ;y

...... 25 i

Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate......................-..................

.../,..... 115 SEP Reference Number 31

. Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual ani Conduct Psoject Managemers Tralning MWO Overall Status (Cycle 14 Refueling Outage)...........................

.......................128 Progress of Cycle 14 Outage Modification Planning.....%......

. 130 Overall Project Ststus (Cycle 14 Refueling Outage)..... *....

.......... 131 de-SEP Reference Number 33 Develop On.Line Maintenance and Modification Schedule Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities #./

( Electrical Maintenance).............................................................

.....,....................54

( Pre s su re E quipme r it).............................................................................................. 55

( Ge ne ral M a int e nanee).............................................................................56

. (Mechanical Maintenance)............................................

........................57 i

(Instrumentation & Control)..............................................

........................58 SEP Reference Number 36 Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Breakdown (Corrective Non Outage Maintenance)....... 39 Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Backlog (Corrective Non Outage Maintenance).

. 41 SEP Reference Number 41 Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance.

.... 43 150 m

?

f Preventive M:intinance items Oyordue..............................

......45 i

Procedurat Noncompliance incidents.................. 4 51 SEP Reference Number 43 implement the Check Valve Test Program C heck Va Ne F ailur e R at e..........................................

.....67 i

SEP Reference Number 44 Compliance With and Use of Procedures Procedurat Nonoompliance incidents (Maintenance)..........................................51 i

SEP Reference Number 46 i

Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program Docu me nt Re view.............................................................

..33 SEP Reference Number 52 I

Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices Radiological Work Practces Program..........

...85 SEP Reference Number 54 l

Complete implementation of Radiological Enhancement Pwgram Peri,onnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative)...........................

21

= Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Wasto.,................................................ 23 Total Skin and Clothing Co nta minations......................................................................... 81 i

Decontaminated Radiaticn Controlled Area......................

..........................83 SEP Reference Number 58 Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Program Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security)...................................................

93 Securtty incident Breakdown...........................,...........................................

94

. Secu rit y S yst e m Failu re s............................................................................................. 9 5 SEP Reference Number 60

- Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program -

Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports........................... 61 SEP Reference Number 61 Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports.....................,61 SEP Reference Number 62 Establish interim System Engineers

-Te mporary Modifications..........................................................

108 Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EARS)......................

109

- Engineering Change N otice Status...................................................................... 111 l

- Engineering Change Notice Breakdown............................

113-t

- SEP Reference Number 68 -

t...

Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and Establish Maans to Monitor Operator Training Licensed Operator Requalification Training.....

119 l

License Candidate Exams........................ ~.,.......,.

..121 L

l-SEP Reference Number 71 l

Improve Controls over Temporary Modifications

..108 Te mporary Modifications...............................

151 i

.; sm.._.b.

m,

.3..:

y.,,,,

6._,,

rr...,.,,,.,

._,4.,m,.,.___.. _,- -.., _ _,_ _ -,-_,. _. _ -

._.,.-_,,m.-.._.'

I REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST R. L. Andrews K. B. Guliani W. W. Orr G. L. Anglehart E. R. Gurdal L. L. Parent W. R. Bateman R. H. Guy T. L. Patterson K. L. Delek R. M. Hawkins R. L. Phelps i

A. D. Bilau M. C. Hendnckson W. J. Ponce B. H. Biome R. R. Henning T. M. Reisdortf C. N. Bloyd K. R. Henry A. W. Richard J.P.Bobba J. B. Herman D. G. Ried C. E. Boughter G. J. Hill G. K. Samide M. A. Breuer K. C. Holthaus T. J. Sardene C. J. Brunnert M. A. Howman B. A. Schmidt M. W. Butt L. G. Huliska S. T. Schmitz i

C. A. Carlson C. J. Husk F. C. Scofield J. W. Chase R. L. Jaworski L. G. Sealock G. R. Chatfield R. A.Johansen H. J. Sefick A. G. Christensen W. C. Jones D. K. Sentel A. J. Clark J. D. Kecy J. W. Shannon O. J. Clayton J. D. Keppler R. W. Short R. P. Clemens D. D. Kloock C. F. Simmons J. L. Connolley J. C. Knight E.L.Skaggs G. M. Cook D. M. Kobunski J. L. Skiles M. R. Core G. J. Krause F. K. Smith S. R, Crtles L. J. Kripal R. L. Sorenson D. W. Dale J. G. Krist J. A. Spijker R. C. DeMeulmeester J. B. Kuhr K. E. Steele R. D. DeYoung L. T. Kunek W.

Steele D. C. Dietz L.E. Labs H. F. Sterba J. A. Drahota M. P. Lazar G. A. Teeple T. R. Dukarski R. C-Learch M. A. Tesar P. D. Dunham S.E. Lee T. G. Therkildsen R. G. Eurich R. E. Lewis J. W. Tills H. J. Faulhaber R. C. Liebentritt D. R. Trausch M. A. Ferdig C. J. Linden P. R. Turner V. H. Frahm B. R. Livingston J. M. Uhland F. F. Franco J. H. Machinnon C.F.Vanecek M. T. Frans G. D. Mamoran J. M. Waszak H. K. Fraser J. W. Marcil G. R. Williams J. F. W. Friedrichsen N. L. Martice S. J. Willrett S. K. Gambhir D. J. Matthews W. C. Woemer J. K. Gasper.

J. M. Mattice W. G. Gates T. J. Melvor M. O. Gautier K. S. McCormick S. W. Gebers R. F. Mehaffey J. M. Glantz K. J. Monis J. T. Gleason D. C. Mueller L. V. Goldberg R. J. Mueller D. J. Golden J. B. Nowhouse D. C. Gorence M. W. Nichols R. E. Gray C. W. Norris M. J. Guinn J T. O'Connor G. E. Guliani 152

POSITIVE TREND REPORT INDICATORS iMEDING INCREAF MANAGEMENT ATTENTION R AT The Positive Trend Report highlights several Perfor*

This secton hsts tiie indcato:s whirkhow anadequacios mance Indcators wah data representing continued per*

as comparox w the OPPD goal and andcators whch formance above the stated goal and indicators with data show inadequacies as compared to the industry upper i

representing signihcant improvement in recent months.

quartile. The indcators will be compared to the industry The following indicators have been selected as exhibiting positive trends:

Dagb!tna hiurvtiness Frecuenev Rate (page 25)

Personnel Radmtion Exoo*g.it The dicabhng injury / illness frequency rate for December (Page 21) 1991 (0.37)is stove the Fort Calhoun goal of 0 31.

The cumulative personnel radiation exposure for 1991 (51.9) is well below the Fort Calhoun goal of 75 man' Rm M Preventrve to MM Maintenaneg (Page 43)

The rato of preventive to total maintenance for Decem.

Diesel Generator Unavehbility ber 1991 (52,7%)is below the Fort Calhoun goal of 60%.

(Page 37)

The cumulative hours of DG.1 & 2 for the last four flumber of Outet Service Centrol Room Estrume011 months of 1991 was below the goalof a maximum of 43.8 hrsts. This goa! was based on the 1990 INPO in.

(ag

. num of out of service control room instruments dustr) median value.

for Decerr bor 1991 (20)is above the Fort Calhoun goal f S.

Igigulkin and Clothina Contaminations (Page 81) in Line Chemistfv Inttruments Oute!.Serwee The to al skin and clothing contaminations for in91 ($$)

p,g, 7q is wall below the Fort Calhoun goal of 90.

The number of in-hne chemistry instruments out of ser.

vce for December 1991 (17) is above the Fort Calhoun goalof 6.

Number of Hot Soots (Page 87)

ADVERSE TREND REPORT The number of Hot Spots for December 1991 (63) ex.

coeds the Fort Calhoun goal of 40.

A Performance Indcator which has data representing three (3) consecutive months of dochning performance Stoekout Rate constitutes an adverse trend. The Adverse Trend Report (Page 101) explains the conditons under which cortain indcators are The percentage of pick tickets generated when the showing adverse trends. An explanaton will be provided amount of parts requested is equal te or less than the for indicators with data representing three months of de.

minimum stocking level and pans are not available is chning performance that have been labeled as adverse above the Fort Calhoun goal of 2%.

trends.

The following indcators are exhibiting adverse trends for Exoedrted Purchase.g ine reporting month:

(Page 103)

The percentage of expedited purchases for December Recordable Iniurvminess Cases Frecuency Rate 1991 (1%) exceeds the Fort r:? oun goal of 0.5%.

(Page 115)

This indicator has been defined by the Manager of the Temocracy Modtfications Safety Department as exhibiting an adverse trend based (Page 108) on the 5 year frequsncy rate.

The age of temporary modifcatons 1of the reporting month exceeds the Fort Calhoun Goals.

Number of Personnel Errort n corted in LERs (Page 117) _

End of Management Attenton Report.

The number of personnel errors reported in LERs has increased for three consecutive months.

End of Adverse Trend Report.

153

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES

&n 'Amou tabihtv' ttatenient has been added to indertors where appropriate.

1995 INPO Industry Goa's have been added to the indcators where appropnate.

((25 er of NPRDS Muwe Fnquees (Page 63)

Thts iriderior has been added to the report.

Seconderv Chemistry (Pags 69)

The graph for this Indicator was revised to show percent of hours outside limns.

AuxFinw System (CCW) Chemistry Hours Outside Station Lim!!s IPage 73)

The graph for this indcator was revised to show percent of hours outside limits.

Outstandm Enaineerina Assistance Recustts (Page 109)

The graph for this indcator has been revised to more accurately represent EAR status.

Encineerino Chance Noge Breakdown (Page 113)

The graph for this indicator has been revised to more accuratety rworecent ECN breakdown.

Number of Personnel Errors Reooned in LERs (Page 117)

A graph illustrating LERs by Root Cause Code and report date has been added to this indicator.

Emeroent MWO Plann!nc Status (P89e 129)

This indicator has been added to the report.

End of Indicator improvementChanges Report.

154

t FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES Event Date Range Production IMWHI CumulatEe iMWHi Cycle 1 09/2693 02/0105 3,299,639 3,299.639 1st Refueling 02/01n5 05/0905 Cycle 2 05/09/75 10/01/76 3,853,322 7,152,961 2nd Refueling 10/01/76 12/1306 Cycle 3 12/13/76 09/300 7 2,805,927 9,958,888 i

3rd Refueling 09/30/77 12/09/77 Cycle 4 12/09/77 10/140 8 3.026,832 12,985,720 4th Refueling 10/14/78 12/249 8 Cycle 5 12/24 08 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 5th Refueling 01/18/B0 06/11/80 Cycle 6 06/11/80 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 3

6th Refueling 09/18/81 12/21/81 Cycle 7 12/21/81 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 7th Refueling 12/06/82 04/07/83-e Cycle 8 04/07/83 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 8th Refueling 03/03/84 07/12/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 9th Refueling 09/28/85 01/16/86 Cycle 10 01/10/86 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 10th Refuelino 03/07/87 06/08/87 Cycle 11 06/08/87 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 11th Refueling 09/27/83 01/31/89 Cycle 12 01/31/89 02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 12th Refuelino 02/17/90 05/29/90 Cycle 13#

05/29/90 02/01/92

Planned Dates 13th Refueling #

02/01/92 05/01/92 Cyck 14#

05/01/92 09/18/93 14th Refueling 09/18/93 11/13/93 Cycle 15# -

11/13/93 03/11/95 15th Refueling

03/11/95 05/06/95 FORT CALHOUN STATION CURREN1 PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS " RECORDS

i-

- First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47 p.m.)

First Electricity Supplied to the System August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH)

September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%)

May 4,1974 Longest Run (477 days)

June 8,1987 Sept. 27,1988 Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468,800 KWH)

October 1987 Most Productive fuel Cycle (4,936,859 MWHHCycle 11)

June 8,1987 Sept. 27,1988 l

J

ML20100P896

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search