ML20100D006

Forwards Deficiency Evaluation Rept Revs Considered Substantive to Final Repts.Revs Evaluated as Nonsubstantive Noted

ML20100D006
Person / Time
Site:	Palo Verde
Issue date:	03/12/1985
From:	Van Brunt E ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR
To:	Kirsch D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
ANPP-32101-TDS, NUDOCS 8504010048
Download: ML20100D006 (4)

Text

_

L ;c

,I'55 Arizona Nuclear Power Project

~" /9/? / 9

// 7 9 P.O. BOX 52034 e PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85072-2034

$lf:

March 12,1985

~ ' > ' ~

ANPP-32101-TDS/TRB U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V 1450 Maria Lane - Suite 210 Walnut Creek,. California 94596-5368

-Attention:

Mr. D. F. Kirsch, Acting Director Division of Resident

Subject:

Deficiency Evaluation Report Revision rile: 85-019-026; D.4.33.2

Dear. Sir:

ANPP has conducted a review of revised final reports, submitted by our A/E, after transmittal of our Final Reports to your office.

Attached is a summary description and evaluation of the impact of changes to Final Reports which the ANPP has. evaluated as substantive changes. Those revisions which have been evaluated as not substantive have been so noted in our files.

Very truly yours,

/

A rLLL E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.

Executive Vice President Project Director EEVB/TRB/nj Attachment cc: See Page Two 850401 850312 PDR K 05000528 1

S PDR 1.{

ff~h

y t.~ :

e

.Mr. D.:F. Kirsch-DER. Revision-Page Two cc:.

Richird DeYoung, Director-Office of Inspection and Enforcement.

-U.ES. Nuclear Regulatory Commission'

-Washington, D. C.

20555~-

t

~

.D.lB. Karner.

W..E. Ide D.'B; Fasnacht A. C.' Rogers L. A..Souza-

D.EE. Fowler T. D. Shriver :

C.LN.' Russo

B.-S.'Kaplan J.'R.

Bynum iJ..M. Allen

'A.'C.'Gehr.

W. J.LStubblefield W. G. Bingham R. L.'Patterson' R..W. Welcher (f.

H.- D. Foster D.-R. Hawkinson'-

R. P. Zinsnerman M. L'.;Clyde~

M. Matt T. J. Bloom D.-N.

Stover

'J. D. Houchen J. E. Kirby D. Canady Records Center-Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 1100 Circle 75 Parkway, Suite 1500 Atlanta', GA' 30339

/

.s "w.. _ _

m m-

-f

$x

+

,l

iDER NO.'

SUMMARY

OF CHANGE IMPACT OF CHANGE 83-59 Revision-1fof our Final: Report stated The changa in the report has SARCN 1183 liad been issued to reflect no impact.

justification-and analysis of the change.i~The revised: report states that SARCN 1285 has superceded 1183.

84--25 The. original ~ Final Report implied =.

The change only clarifies the that all-supply registers and grilles corrective action and has no for Units.1, 2.and'3 would be modi-impact _on the resolution of fied. The revised report states that

the deficiency.-

'the supply. registers and grilles will F

-be modified only~as required.-

84-51' I The original report stated th'at the The change to 29. seconds has delivery of feedwater flow to the no impact and in fact is a

-steam generators would be changed more conservativeitime than-from 20 seconds to 30 seconds follow-30 seconds. The change to-ing an AFAS. The revised report Mode 4 is consistent with our flowers this to 29 seconds. Also, we STA evaluation and does not

stated that modifications would be =

change any commitment made'_in

' completed prior to fuel load.'

The.

our licensing document.

revised report states completion by Mode 4.

84-53 jIn the. Condition Description _of The change only provides con-

_ _m 1

Revision 1 to our Final Report, we sistency between the two sec-state NCR 8320 and,9321 would be tions and has no impact on-

~

_dispositioned. rework;;however, in the resolution of the deficiency.-

the Corrective Action section, it

- stated "use-as-is."

The revised-l

' report changes the Corrective Action to reflect the Condition.

Description. Additionally, we ref-

.erenced NCRs.9902, 9903, and 9881 in the description but did not_ reference-them in the Corrective; Action. The revision includes these NCRs.

5

,84 60-g The original report addressed fifty This change has no impact on

-(50)" suspect operators which-would the resolution of this

~

1. ^

be re-lubricated.with Nebula EP-l' deficiency.

lubricant. Additional investigation has shown that some of these operators zwere supplied:under purchase orders "which were already lubricated.with 9 ^

._r up i

y i

• DER NO.

SUMMARY

OF CHANGE IMPACT OF CHANGE 84-60 Nebula EP-1.

The revised report (Continued) clarifies the corrective action to ext.lude those operators already "g-lubricated with Nebula EP-1 from being re-lubricated.

i 84-62 The original report did not make ref-There is no impact by the erence to the SARCN which amends the change. The revised report SAR to address the changes in time provides the additional in-h$

sequencing.

formation that SARCN 1272 addresses the changes in time' sequencing.

.g-a N=

t w

h-5 x_

d 2

@z.

1

.s e1 1

.. _ - - - - - - -.