ML20099C639
| ML20099C639 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak |
| Issue date: | 11/16/1984 |
| From: | Watkins M BISHOP, COOK, PURCELL & REYNOLDS, TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | Bloch P, Grossman H, Jordan W Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| CON-#484-194 OL-2, NUDOCS 8411200007 | |
| Download: ML20099C639 (2) | |
Text
- p&
^
~
a
.f
!RELATED CORRESPONDEncg V
~
.00IMETEE
- Law orrects or USHRC 4
- BIS HOP,' LIB ERM AN, COOK, PU RCELL-& R EYNOLDS
- g n g j p p.g in scw voR=
- saco sevcNicenrw srRcci, u.w.
s WAs HINGroN, D.C. 2c o36 stsHoP, LiscRMAN & CoC\\M
. liss avcuuc or vuc AucRicas -
cacaj asi-sooo
.DFFICE Of SECkt ta "C"voa""c*'o""'o038-TcLex 44os74 Nit 4w ut.
00CXETIN9 & SEitv)U'
(*'a> 7o -oioo
-BRANCH '
LtcLex asam WRITcR*s DIRcCT DIAL tao => 857-98 85 '
November 16, 1984 Peter B. Bloch,;Esq.
-Dr. Walter,H.. Jordan.
Chairman, Atomic Safety and 881 West Outer Drive Licensing; Board.
Oak Ridge, TN :37830
'U.S. Nuclear: Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Herbert Grossman,Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S.. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.-
20555 Re:
Texas Utilities Electric Company,.et al.
(Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station 7 Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos.. 50-445-2, 50-446-2 Gentlemen:
Pursuant to this morning's telephone conference, the under-signed has reviewed-items 1 through 15 listed in Applicants' two letters dated October 18,l1984, which listed documents as to l
which Applicants claimed the privilege for trial preparation
[~
materials.
Our' review has focused on the provision of 10 C.F.R.
S2.740 (b) (2) specifying that:
'In ordering discovery.of such materials when the required showing has been made, the pre-siding officer shall, protect against dis--
closure of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories of an attorney or l
.other representative of a party concerning the proceeding.
l 8411200007 841116
'T q
gDRADOCK 05000445 m
.=
m.
=.
x2 e
n l*
- Df
+
,f b
9 12 -. -
r iOurrehiewhasfidentifdidL.twodocuments?in'whichthemental~-
(impression ~s,iconclusions!and opinions;of:counselEappear. 1We
~
ienclose: copies 1of.those; documents with.the relevant-entries y
i: bracketed and underlined infred' ink.:
1 1
.Thelfirst document (item 8'in'.'our.firstDietter' dated...
>t 7
October 18)' consists;of-Mr.9Lipinsky's' memo of-a conversationi 2
- ;with Applicants' counsel,-in which~ counsel advised Mr. Lipinsky that he had.been~ called as.a witness:in.this proceeding!by; Intervenor.. The-last' sentence of the third 1 paragraph on page-itwo represents both la; mental: impression = and a ' conclusion of-
. counsel.
The secondfdocumenti(item 15Lin our"second_ letter dated-
~
October 18)fconsists of Mr.--Lipinsky's memo of'a conversation'
.regarding annaffidavit that Mr.,Lipinsky had prepared for.use-inJ Jlitigation.-.The second and third. sentences of the second, para-
-graph.also. represent the mental impressions-and: conclusions of
~
- counsel.
-Applicants request-that.the Bonrd'nuthorize counsel for 0;B. Cannon & Son, Inc. to delete the three sentences 1 identified from the. documents to be;provided'to the parties and the: Board..
Should.the1 request..be3 granted,' Applicants request;,that the-enclosures to this letter be returned to~the undersigned.
Ipspectfully sub 'tted, f
\\)
McNeill Watkins II t
Counsel ~for Applicants Enc cc. (w/out Enc) :
~'
Service List 4
4 I
i:
i-
'1 i
r
- _..,..,,..., -, _. _. _, ~.. -, -.. -.. - -.