Text

Performance Indicators,June 1992
	ML20099B495
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	06/30/1992
From:	; OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20099B492	List: ML20099B488; ML20099B495;
References
	NUDOCS 9207310189
	Download: ML20099B495 (111)
	v • d • e

..

bWE:eu b.. h re,: ;A.L a w,s.ma - 2 "

e Ae -

"-m

>x*

B R E N " E R - "* "'

r_

N A

'l

'C

~

FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS JUNE 1992

+

m c,..:.

.I

-=

g a n== %jidt m2

~~mm~ mm e1811r r

m r

N.

' m d EICI 2_-

.sy

' = - 7:~.

)

,/

,)

Prepared by:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group 9207310189 920727 PDR ADOCK 05000285 J

%Aofacs%awwn,albl4...

il Onudos wudan, wnd wwndjud anoni...

g d w a, ?phans, cwwn49 cenaulawnl...

dwa,way,a)?p,...dwde&ng,ikja 9ht ih lh d %, weuj, %.

at w iavna-duulnd, vol L m?l of akna!,

p aswa, a w as owm,my we a wh ws am wnd th ub, wnd phdioin, p

l%L cens l urn, kig ik 9kl kd of pawn,, voijal on, de&ng, lh 911 l%ny.

Jaws).O'Cm

\\

OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT 4

Prepared By:

Production Engineering Division.

System Engineering Test and Performance Group JUNE 1992

'i

ABSTRACT PURPOSE The " Performance Indicators Program"is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant perior-mance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The information is presented in a way that provides ready identification of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing and monitoring Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on safety and reliability. Some performance indicators show company goals or industry information. This information can be used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation.

SCOPE The conditions, goals, and projections reflected within this report are current as of the end of the month being reported, unless otherwise stated.

In order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing the program:

1) Data was selected which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.

2) Established corporate goals and industry information were included for comparison.

3) Formal definitions were developed for each performance parameter to ensure consistency in future reports and allow comparison with industry averages where appropriate.

Comments and input ere encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report. Please refer comments to the System Engineering Department's Test and Performance Group. To increase personnel awareness of Fort Calhoun Station's plant performance, it is suggested that this report be distributed throughout your respective departments.

REFERENCES INPO Good Practices OA 102, " Performance Monitoring - Management information" INPO Report Dated November 1984," Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" NUMARC 87-00," Guidelines and Technical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Station Black out at Light Water Reactors", Revision 1, Appendix D. "EDG Reliability Program", dated April 6,1990.

Table of Contents / Summary INPO INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS PAGE INWJST RY pff,Q, QPfD LPFFA MW QOdL THis k*~WTH LAST LONTH TREND UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7,000 HOURS CRITICAL..

o.s3.

o sm 4.7s

.NMA.

3 SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE:

HIGH PRESSURE SAFEW INJECTION SYSTEM..

.00014..

. 0 008,..00022..

.000069..

.. N A..

.6 AUXlLIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM.

. 0.0034.

. 0.01.

.0.0086.

.0.0094

.. NA..

.7 EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM.

.00065..

.0.024.

. 0 0062..

.00053..

.. N A..

.8 THERMAL PERFORMANCE.

. 99.8%..

. 99 3%... 99 9%..

. 99 6%.

..l 10 UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR.

. 841 %..

. 69 2%.,

91.7%..

. 70 3%.

.. l..

.12 UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR..

.1.87%..

. 4.5%... 8 3%..

. 20 0%.

.. l..

13 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR c=aocurwr.m3 NA -... 7.5x10 4.,7.5 x10-4.. 7.07x10-4.

.. NA...15 COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE (man. rem).

118.FYR,. 250NR. 228.3.

. 226.5..

. NA...16 VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE tcube to -

. 2.118 uYR.. 3.00G'YR... 732 6..

. 343.0..

.. N A... 17 INDL ' TRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT RATE / DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE...... _...

0.16

. 0..'

. 0.64.

.. 0.76.

..NMA.. 18 CHEF.;STRY INDEX/ SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY..

. 0.20..

. 0.45

. 0.55.

. 0 50

.. N MA..45 OPERATIONS EAGE r*OJSTRY

,,QPfQ, QPPf,Q UPPCR M QpdL TH!9 LWTM L AST L*'WTH M

STATON NET GENERATON (10,000 Mwh)..

.. NA..

. 31.9.

. 24.6

. NA..

.1 FORCED OUTAGE RATE.....

. 0.25%..

. 2 4%.... 7.65%.

7.31%.

N A..

.2 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7,000 CRITICAL HOURS

.. 0.63.

.. o..,_.. 0.35..

. 0.35.. _..

.. D

.3 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (INPO DEFINITION)..

....0..

. 0..

.. o..

.. l..

.4 UNPLANNED SAFEW SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (NRC DEFINITION)..

. 0... _.... 3..

. 0..

.1.

.. l....

5 GROSS HEAT RATE.

..... N A..

.. N A.. 10.194.

10.348..

., N A..

.9 EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR.

.. N A..

.. NA.

. 92.7%..

. 74.6%.

.. l..

.11 UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR,..

. 84.1%... 69.2%... 91.7%..

. 70.3% ;

.. l..

.12 UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR...

.1.87%..

. 4.5%... 8.3%..

. 20.0%.

.. l..

.13 PLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR.

.. N A.-.

. 26.3%.

. 0%.

.97%.

.. l..

.14

OPERATIONS (cont'd)

PAGE POJST RY OPPD QEEQ UPPFA1 %

QQM, TH!S LONTH LAST LOMTH IPJGQ FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR (microcuries/ gram)...NA.

. 7.5x10-4.. 7.5x10-4.. 7,07x104.

.. N A...15 DAILY 1 HERMAL OUTPUT (mmh)....

.. N A.

1495.

.. N A.,

..NA

.. N A...19 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1,000 CRITICAL HOURS..

.. NA.

. 0 2 -... 0 92.

. 0 68..

.._ NMA.. 20 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET....-.. N A..

.. NA..

.. N A,,

.. NA..... 21 DOCUMENT REVIEW..

.. NA.

..N A.

.. N A..

.. N A... 22 MAINTENANCE PAGE INDUSTRY p,PfPQ, QPEQ P

uPPrn m Qg6L TH!S LONTH t_AST LONTH TREND EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT REllABILITY......

.. N A..

.. NA..

.. NA....... N A... 23 DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS)..

.. N A,

.. <4

.. N A

.. N A..

.. NA... 24 DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY (cumulanwe.hr ) NA..

c210 8/DG...... b.,

.. N A....

.. N A..,. 25 AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NONOUTAGE).... N A -.

. N A......... N A......._ N A..

.. A.... 26 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BRdAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE)........NA..

.. N A..

.. NA.

.. NA..

.. N A.... 27 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NONOUTAGE)....

... N A..

.. NA -... 51.3%..

. 48.6%.

.. D.

28 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE.

.. N A..

65%..

. 53 4%.... 424%.

.. NMA.,29 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE..

.. NA.

. 0.5%..

.1.0%..

. 0,72%..-....NMA 30 NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS.

....,. N A.

.. < 13..

.9.

.E..

.. l.... 31 y

MAINTENANCE OVERTIME.....

.. NA..

.10%... 4.8%..

. 8 6%.....-.. l.. 32 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENAriCE)..

. NA..

..... NA.

. 0..

. 0....

.. I... 33 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE MAINTENANCE)..... N A.

.. <350..

.380.

.. 432.

..NMA..94-PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE).

. N A.....-. 80%

.. N A..

.NA...35 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE EOUIPMENT)...

... N A.. -..

. 80%..

.. NA..

.. NA _..._.,, N A... 36 t

li

- ~, _.... _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

4 1

).

MAfNTENANCE (cont'd))

PAGE o

MDUSTRY

.QffD, Qff.Q UPPER P.

QQ,4( I},g1M3 LAST l.MH M

PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED l

MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES j

(^2ENERAL MAINTENANCE).

.. N A..

._80%..

.. N A..

.. N A.... 37 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE).

.., N A..

. 80%..

.. N A..

.. N A... 38 PE9 CENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED I

MAINTENANCE AChVITIES

]

(INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL).

.. NA..

. 80%..

.. NA..

.. N A..

.. NA... 39 f

NUMBER OF MISSED SURVElLLANCE i

TEST S RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTr.

.. N A.

. 0..

.0.

.. l.... 40 COMPONENT FAILURE ANALYSIS REPORT (CFAR)

SUMMARY

.s NA..

.. NA.

.. NA..

.. N A....-. 41 i

NUMBER OF NPRDS

(

MULTIPLE FAILURES.

.. NA..

.. N A..

.. N '

.. NA,.

.. N A.,.. 42 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS..

... NA.

.. N A..

.. N A.

.. N A..

.. NA.. 43 CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE.

.. NA..

2.00E4.. 6.22E-7.

. 6 07E.7,

.. N A.. 44 CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION PAGE I

1Y3t? STAY

,QffQ, QfEQ s

l umn m QQat TH:s wl2 LASMMH IfftQ COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)...

... 118.5NR.. 250NR,. 228.3..

.._. 226.5..

N A.... 16 VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID j

RADIOACTIVE WASTE.

. _.... 2.118.SYR. 3.00&YR.. 732.6_.

. 343.0.... -.... N A.... 17 i

SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY..,

0.20

. 0 45.

. 0.55..

. 0.50..

. NMA... 45 l

PRIMARY SYSTM CHEMISTRY l

PERCENT OF h.,RS OUT OF LIMIT.

. NA..

. 2%... 1.11 %..

. 0.96%..

.. NA.,,. 4 6 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS.

NA........ NA..

. 0% -..

. 0% -.

,. N A..

.47 i

IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE....

.. NA..

.~..6..

_. 2 4 _

. 20..

.. A _..... 4 8 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED...

.. N A..

.. NA.

. 155..

..-. 0.

..NA '. 49 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE (mrem)..

.. N A..

.1,500NR...104..

.232.

... N A.... 50 TOTAL SKIN AND i

CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS.

.. NA.

.. 144.

.224

...-... 213.

.. N MA.. 51 l-f e

iii

~ -.

CHEMISTRY AND RAqLOGICAL PROMCTION (cont'd) _

PAGE NOUSTRY M

QEnD ung e QQAL TH!S LONTH LAST LOMTH IBMfQ DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA....

.. N A..

. 88

. 87 0%..

. 86 2%.

..NMA.... 52 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM.

.. N A...-.... N A.

.1.

.. l...... 5 3 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS.

..NA.,.tomove 1/mo.,,,62.

. 63.

.. l..... 54 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT (curies)....

....NA.

.340.

.358 5.

.. N A..

.. N A.. 55 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT (curies)......NA..

.225.

. 176.1.

.. NA.

.. l..

. 56 SECURITY IMGE wnuSiny Qrf.Q QEgg itpfrg QQAL TRS EONTH t AST iONTH IE2{Q LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY).

.... NA..

,. NA.

... 33.

. 35.

.. NA... 57 SECURITY NON-SYSTEM FAILURES.

. NA..

.. N A..

.. N A.

. N A..

.. N A... 58 SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES..

.. N A..

.. NA..

.. N A

.. N A..

.. NA... 59 MATERIALS. AND OUTSIDE SERVICES IMGE mnoSTRy CEED REED uPPCP M QQ&L TH!S ArJfrH LAST LONTH TREND ANUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON-OUTAGE)..,

.. NA.

. 3 5%... 2.1%..

,.0.89%.

..D 60 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE ($ milron).....

,.NA..

.. N A..

. 12.4..

.13.6

..-... N A.. 61 SPARE PARTS ISSUED ($ thousands)_..

..... NA..

.. N A..

. 120.1.

. 267.8..

.. NA... 61 INVENTORY ACCURACY..

.. NA.,

. 98%

. 04%..

. 94%.

.. NMA... 62 STOCKOUT RATE..

.. N A.

. 2.6%... 1.2%..

. 0.7%.

..D 62 EXPEDITED PURCHASES..

... NA.

. 0.5%... 0.0%...... 0 31%.

..l.

63 INVOICE BREAKDOWN..

.. N A..

.. N A.

., N A....-.... N A,.. 64 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING..

.. N A..

.. N A.. 83.7%..

. 67.5%.

..D..

64 DESIGN CNGhJEERING PAGE t

l NDUSTRY QEEQ QEgQ I

UPPER m QQAL-TH!S 6.ONTH LAST AONTH I,EQiQ OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS..

... N A..

.NA... 176..

.172.

.. N A.... 65 IV

3-1 DESIGN ENGINEERING (cont'd)

PAGE l

20211E1 CEED CEER UDPE H 1%

QQAL TH!S ADM LAST LONTH ]ff,1Q 1

TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS

}

(EXC UDING SCAFFOLDING).

... N A.

.. o..

.21..

21 l..

.. 66 j

ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE Rf'OUEST (E%R) BREAKDOWN....

. _ NA..

.. N A.

.170..

.106.

.NA.

. 67 a

i ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS.

.. N A..

.. NA.

.170.

.,167.

.. N A.-. 68 ENGINEER!NG CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN.

..NA,

.. N A..

.. NA.

.. N A._...... N A.. 69 1

k INDUSTRIAL S AFETY fMGE cour.at zea ceco UPPED 1%

(W TH'S AONTH LAST LOPITH jffQQ i

DISABLING INJURY / ILLNESS FREOUENCY RATE. 0.1r

.. o. 3..

. 0 64..

. o 76.

.. NMA. 18 4

RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES l

FREQUENCY RATE.

.. N A..

. 2 0..

. 2.22

. 2.2 7..

.. NMA... 70 i

i HUM AN RESOURCES PAGE NOUSTRY QDEQ QEED

,l Oppen 1M QQLL TH'S 6.MTH MT KONTH TREND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS j

REPORTED IN LERs..

.. N A..

.. N A,

.1.

.0.

... D... 71

)

LE" ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN.

.. N A..

.. NA.

.. NA..

.. NA..... 72 STAFFING LEVEL..

,. N A._

.. N A..

.. NA..

.. NA.. 73 l

PERSONNEi. TURNOVER RATE.

.. N A..

.. NA..

.. N A.

.. N A.,

.. N A... 73 i

I TRAINING AND OUAllFICATION PAGE INNSTnY QEgg QEEQ j

ooPeni m QQaL TH!S LONTH LAST ADNTH TREND I

j LICENSED OPERATOR j

REQUALIFICATION TRAINING,.,

.. NA..

.. NA.

.. N A..

74 l

IJCENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS..

.. NA..

.. N A..

.. N A.

.. N A..

.. N A.... 75 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS.

.. N A..

.. N A ;

.. N A.

.. N A.,

.. N A.. 76 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS.

..... N A..

.. N A -.... N A......977,

.. N A.. 77 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING..

.. N A..

. 6,054..

.. N A... 78 l

j.

l t

i I

V

.-+_,n,

-c.

,--..,,,.e,

,, - ~,

~.. - _._.

QUALITY ASSURANCE PAGE eausiny CER CCD UPNR 1% QQQ TH!S AmrH t.AST LF'WTH M

VOLATIONS PER 1.000 INSPECTION HOURS.....

NA..

1. 5..

. 3 28.

. 2 80.

-A.

. 79 COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV PLANTS....

....,,....NA..

.. NA..

.NA.

.. N A..

.. N A... 80 CUMULATIVE t 'OLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVE. MONTH RUNNING TOTAL)..

.. N A..

. 15/3..

.140.

.. A.. 81.

OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTON REPORTS.

..NA.

.. N A.

. 83._

. 83.

..l 82 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS

.. -.... N A..

.. N A..

.0/8.

47.

-.A 83 CARS ISSUED s. SIGNIF. CARS vs.

NRC VOLATIONS ISSUED vs.

LERs REPORTED..

.., N A..

.. N A..

.. N A.

.. NA..

.. NA.. 84 REFUELING OUTAGE EDUSTRY QED QEQ UPPER iM QQQ TH!S kONTH 1 AST kmTH IffQQ MWO PLANNING STATUS....

.... NA......... NA..... NA......,. NA..

., NA.... 85 OVERALL PROJECT STATUS.

4-..

.. NA _.

NA........ NA.......... NA

... NA..... 88 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 16 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING.,

.. NA........ NA.,...... NA.

NA

....... NA.. 8 7 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFIN! TONS..

.. 88 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX...

. 96 HEPORT DISTRIBUTON LIST.

. 98 l

SUMM ARY SECTION l

POSITIVE TREND REPORT..

. 99 l

ADVERSE TREND REPORT....

. 99 INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT..

........ 99 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES...........

.100 TABLE OF CONTENTSiSUMM ARY TREND SYMBOLS A - ADVERSE TREND l-lMPROVED PERFORMANCE D - DECLINING PERFORMANCE NMA - NEEDS MANAGEMENT ATTENTON -

NA - NOT APPLICABLE /AVAILABLE i

Vi l

i n

n---.-,

. -, -,,, - -,. ~,.., - -. -... -.,.

4..r.

.:..me

1 i

Net Generation (10,000 Mw hours) 50-i 1

l M

e 34 61 35 05 j

r sue 7

31 88

@h 30 sa Cycle 14 gl g

$ 7 Refueling h4 $h'E si 3

fh$i

$prN$$

M Outage k

gp g

8 20-gg gjjg

[gn.[ ggp gy jgg e

h s0(p 13 28

,w

" 10 - kp;u Y

%~

W@ D: M ls

$N

E J

oa un gav M

sw ma M#

$Y5 MJ

%e

'!E D

M

%j%a $l$',NW

%M as

& mt W4

&b

@$e di gnm 4

O 1

Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 STATION NET GENERATION i

I

{

This indicator shows the net generation of the Fort Calhoun Station for the reporting month.

During the month of June 1992, a net total of 318,788 MWH was generated by the Fort Calhoun Station.

Unplanned energy losses for the month were a result of the forced outage that occurred on 6/1/92 due to a dropped control rod. The plant was returned to 100% power on 6/4/

i 92.

The station was returned to service after the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage when the reactor was taken critical on 5/1/92 at 1035 hours0.012 days 0.288 hours 0.00171 weeks 3.938175e-4 months and the generator was put on-line on 5/3/92. A forced outage occurred on 5/14/92 when the turbine generator tripped on a false high level moisture separator trip signal which caused a simultaneous reactor trip.

The reactor was retumed to critical and the generator was put on line on 5/15/92.

Unplanned energy losses for May were: 1) the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage extension; 2) the reduction to 58% power for the inoperable condenser valve: 3) the reactor trip; 4) the hold at 48% power for repair on a feedwater pump suction valve; and 5) the 5/31 dropped control rod caused by a faulty clutch coil.

The low net generation for the months of September and October 1991 was due to the following three forced outages: 1) the station batteries replacement outage from 9/12/91 t

at 2100 hours0.0243 days 0.583 hours 0.00347 weeks 7.9905e-4 months through 10/6/91 at 1114 hours0.0129 days 0.309 hours 0.00184 weeks 4.23877e-4 months ; 2) a steam leak on the drain line from a turbine control valve was repaired from 10/18/91 at 0307 hours0.00355 days 0.0853 hours 5.076058e-4 weeks 1.168135e-4 months to 10/19/91 at 1116 hours0.0129 days 0.31 hours 0.00185 weeks 4.24638e-4 months ; and 3) a steam leak repair on a test pipe on the high pressure turbine shell from 10/25/91 at 2204 to 10/26/91 at 0810.

a Data Source: Station Generation Report Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 1

4

- - ~. -

- ~.. -.

Forced Outage Rate 20%-

IGOOD]

- O -- 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals

-C}-

1991 Industry upper 1C Percentile (0.25%)

15%-

9.7. 9.3 1o%-

5%-

1A C

O O

O 0%

'89

'90

'91 Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 FORCED OUTAGE RATE The forced outage rate was reported as 7.65% for the twelve months from 7/1/91 to 6/

30/92.

A forced outage occurred on 6/1/92 when the unit was shutdown due to a dropped control rod. The rod was dropped at 2305 on 5/31/92 and shutdown began at that time.

The generator was taken off-line at 0234 on 6/1/92 and the reactor was shutdown at 0330 on the same day. The reactor was returned to critical on 6/2/92 at 0211 and the generator was put on-line at 0852 the same day.

A forced outage occurred on 5/14/92 at 1557 hours0.018 days 0.433 hours 0.00257 weeks 5.924385e-4 months when the turbine generator tripped on a false high level moisture separator trip signal which caused a simultaneous reactor trip. The reactor was retumed to critical at 0537 on 5/15/92 and the generator was on-line at 1150 hours0.0133 days 0.319 hours 0.0019 weeks 4.37575e-4 months at 5/15/92.

During the months of September and October 1991 a forced outage occurred when the station batteries were declared inoperable. The generator was taken off-line on 9/12/91 and remained off line until 10/6 /91.

The generator was taken off line on October 18 & 19,1991 due to a steam leak on a turbine control valve before seat drain line. The generator was again taken off-line on October 25 & 26 due to a steam leak from an instrument tap on the high pressure tur-bine.

A forced outage occurred during the month of August 1991 to replace a failed potential transformer (PT). This PT converted 345 KV to 120V for use in the breaker synchroniza-tion circuit.

The 1992 and 1991 Fort Calhoun goals for Forced Outage Rate are 2.4%.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & NERC GAD Forms Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 2

Fcs Reactor scrams Per 7,000 Hours critical (Year to date)

=

-+-- Fcs Reactor scrams Per 7,000 Hours entical (for the last 36 months)

-O-1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals B-

--6--

1995 INPO Industry Goal 6-

-C}- Industry Upper 10% (0.63 per 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months critical over a 36 month time period) 4-2-

b-b b

b b

b 0--o r-c.

> :-c.

r-c i o, Jut 91 Aug. sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 5-Q Number of FCs Reactor scrams 3-2-

1-0 0 0 0 0

0 0

0 P

0 I

i i 6

6 1

0

'88 '89 90 91 Jul91 Aug. sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May.Jun92 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMC PER 7,000 HOURS CRITICAL The upper graph shows the number of unplanned automatic reactor scrams per 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months critical (as defined in INPO's 11/91 publication " Detailed Descriptions of Interna-tional Nuclear Power Plant Performance Indicators and Other indicators") for Fort Cal-houn Statior. This value is calculated by multiplying the total number of scrams in a -

specified time period by 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months , then dividing that number by the total number of critical hours in the same time period.- The year-to-date station value is 3.2? and the value for the last 36 months is 0.35 for the month of June 1992. The lower graph shows the number of unplanned automatic reactor scrams that occurred during each month for the last twelve months.

There was one unplanned automatic reactor scram in May 1992. This scram occurred on May 14 at 1557 when the turbine generator tripped on a false high level moisture separator trip signal which caused a simultaneous reactor trip. The last unplanned automatic reactor scram prior to this occurred on July 2,1986.

The 1992 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams per 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months critical has -

been set at zero. The 1995 INPO industry goalis one unplanned automatic reactor scram per 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months critical. The industry upper ten percentile value is approximately -

0.63 scrams per 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months critical for a 36 month time period.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)-

Accountability: Patterson Advarse Trend: None 3-

3-O Safoty System Actuations

-O-1992 Fort Calhoun Goal C

Industry Upper 10 Percentile 2-1 1-0 C, O, O, O, O, O, C, O, O, O,

C.,

O,

,3

'89 SO '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS-(INPO DEFINITION)

There were no unplanned safety system actuations during the month of June 1992, The 1992 goal for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is tero.

The industry upper ten percentile value for the number of unplanned safety system l

actuations per year is zero. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the l

upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants for this indicator.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)-

Accountability: Jaworski/Foley/Ronning Adverse Trend: None I

4 I

10-12 Month Running Total SSA '

l

--O--

Critical Hours 900 i

O Safety System Actuations (SSA) l 8-800 g

% -700

.9 E 6-600 E j

500 3

{'

$4-400 g st S

a a

i 300 v\\

2

/

L 2-200 i

1 i

[

j g

100 f

4 0/,

4 O

0005

-0 j

'89 '90 '91 JASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJ 1990 1991 1992 j

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS-(NRC DEFINITIDN) l This indicator shows the number of unplanned safety system actuations (SSAs) which j

include the High and Low Pressure Safety injection Systems, the Safety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classification of SSAs includes actuations when major equipment is operated and when the logic systems for these safety systems are challenged.

An unplanned safety system actuation occurred on May 14,1992 when the turbine generator tripped on a false high level moisture separator trip signal which caused a simultaneous reactor trip ano subsequent a'nticipatory start signal to both diesel genera-tors.

1 In June 1991 when there were two anticipatory signal starts for DG-2. The first start occurred after a control relay was bumped causing a momentary loss of power to safety bus 1 A4. DG-2 started a second time when a breaker trip occurred during DG 1 breaker synchronization. DG-2 was not required to provide power to the safety bus in either of these situations.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a maximum of three.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountabiliy: Jaworski/Foley/Ronning Adverse Trend: None 5

O 1992 Monthly High Pressure Safety injection System Unavailability Value

-W- - 1992 High Pressure Safety injection System Unavailability Value Yoar to-Date

--O--

1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals 1991 High Pressure Safety injection System Unavailatulity Value Year-to-Date

-A-1995 INPO industry Goal (0.02)

--G-Industry Upper 10% (0.0014) 0.025 -

j 0.02 -

A A

A A-

-A A

A J

0.015 -

Cycle 14 Refueling 0.01 -

C O

O O

O Outage C

O 0.005 -

g V

rP r

0 u

Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 HIGH PRESSt.

SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the High Pressure Safety injection System unavailability value, as defined by INPO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the report-ing month.

The High Pressure Safety injection System unavailability value for June 1992 was 0.00072. There were 1.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months of planned unavailability for surveillance tests in June.

The 1992 year-to-date HPSI unavailability value was 0.0022 at the end of June.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 0.008. The 1995 INPO industry goalis 0.02 and the industry upper ten pementile value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91) is approximately 0.0014.

Data Source: Jaworski/Schaffer Accountability: Jaworski/Schaffer Adverse Tread: None 6

y -

+w

-%=c w

.cv~-.

ew

,e-.----

-+m-

-+

.O 1992 Monthly Auxiliary Feedwater Sys:em Unavailability Value

--M--

1992 Auxiliary Feedwater System Unavailability Value Year to.date

--O-1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals

+ 1991 Auxiuary Feedwater System Unavailability Value Year to date 1995 INPO Industry Goal

--O-Industry Upper 10% (0.0034) 0.025-A A

-A A

A--A A

A

-A 0.02 -

C O

O O

O 0.015 -

Cycle 14 0.01 -

. Refueling g

O

Outage 0.005 -

gg 4

e a

a e

a a

o g

sw 0

M

,F, W ~,*,

Jul91 Aug sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb' Mar Apr May..Jun92-l AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Auxiliary Feedwater System Unavailability value, as defined by INPO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the reporting month.

The Auxiliary Feedwater System Unavailability Value for June 1992 was 0.0086, 2.82 :

hours of planned unavailability were the result of a PM and 7.33 hours3.819444e-4 days 0.00917 hours 5.456349e-5 weeks 1.25565e-5 months of unplanned unavailability were required for corrective maintenance on a flow instrument.

The 1992 year-to-date AFW unavailability value was 0.0061 at the end of June.

L The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 0.01. The 1995 INPO industry goal is 0.025 and the industry upper ten percentile value (for the three year period from 1/89 L

through 12/91) is approximately 0.0034.

L Data Source: -Jaworski/Hilgenkamp Accountability: Jaworski/Hilgenkamp -

Adverse Trend: None

O 1992 Monthly Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value

-M-1992 Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value Year to Date IGOODI

-O-1991 &1992 For1 Calhoun Goals (0.024)

- 1991 Emergency AC Powtr Unavailability Value Year-to-Date 0.06 - 1995 INPO Industry Goal (0.025)

-O-Industry Upper 10% (.0065)

~

0.04-

~

b

{:

]:

E}

0.03 -

e e

0.02-0.01 -

O O

fi - G 0

x,W

, x,x7 Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Emergency AC Power System unavail6bility value, as defined by INPO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the reporting month.

The Emergency AC Power System unavailability value for June 1992 is 0.0062. On June 10, there were 9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months of planned unavailability for DG-2 for re-torqueing radiator fan t,!ade retaining bolts.

The Eme gency AC Power System unavailability value year-to-date is 0.0019.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 0.024. The 1995 INPO industry goalis 0.022, and the industry upper ten percentile value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91) is approximately 0.0065.

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning Accountability: Jaworski/Ronning Adverse Trend: None e

l

~

O Monthly Gross Heat Rate

--*- Year to-Date Gross Heat Rate I

3 12-E

?m 8

9 11-10520 103o4 10023 Cycle 14 Refueling W

=A 10-Outage (I]

h(j 40 W

es OR

??

NV If th M h

di?ffhkh sg u

i i

i...:

6 M1 4A i

9 n

i i

'89

'90

'91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 GROSS HEAT RATE This indicator shows the Gross Heat Rate (GHR) for the reporting month, the year-to-date value, and the year end GHR for the previous 3 years.

The gross heat rate for the FC:1 Calhoun Station was reported as 10,194 BTU /KWH during the month of June 1992, 1

The year-to-date gross heat rate was reported as 10,214 BTU /KWH.

Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

Accc' ntability: Patterson a

Adverse Trends: None

O 1992 uontniy Therma Performance

-It--

1952 Year to-Date Average Thermal Performance 4

-O-1992 Fort Calhoun Goal (99.3%)

l GOOy 1995 INPO Industry Goal (99.5%)

-O-Industry Upper 10% (99.8%)

l 100% -

D O--O O

D TT D

D D

D O

O L

L h-L 3;$

-L L

L L

h A

C O

O O

W-O---C O

C

---C O

O 99%- +

Q Cyde 14 Refueling Z

4-j' Outage

~[

[

ggg _

[

97% -

[

n 4

9; b

96%

Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 THERM AL PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Thermal Performance value for the reporting month, the 1992 Fort Calhoun Ocal, the 1995 INPO industry goal and the industry median value.

The thermal performance value for the reporting month was 99.9%

The 1992 Fort Calhoun Goa' for this indicator is 99.3% The 1995 INPO industry goal is 99.5% and the industry upper ten percentile value (for the one onar period from 1/90 through 12/91) is approximately 99.8%.

l Data Source: Jaworski/Popek Accountability: Jaworski/Popek Adverse Trend: None 10 l

1 l

O Monthly EAF Year to Date EAF

$0%-

E

+

77 00% -

lGooo]

s 56.6 60% -

Cyde 14 Refue!ing Outage 40% -

4

/

20% -

F 0%

I i

i i

i

'89 10 91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Au0 Sep Oct Nov Dec92 EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF), the year to-date EAF for 1992, and the EAF for the previous 3 years.

The EAF for June 1992 was reported as 92.7%.

The year-to-date EAF was reported as 41.7%.

Data Source: Dietz/Parra (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None I

11

______-_----___--_-----A

O 1992 Monthly Unit Capability Factor 4

-M-1992 Year-to-Date Averago Unit Capability Factor l GOODl

- 1991 Year to Date Average Unit Capability Factor

-O 1991 &1992 Fort Calhoun Goals

- 199s INPO Industry Goal (80%)

-O-Industry Upper 10% (84.1% for a Three Year Average) 100% -

90%-

C N

-O O

A 80% -

h b

N f

p 70% -

D O

O-C c0%-

Cycle 14 Refueling 50% -

40%-

/

~

30% -

20%-

10% -

0%

Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Unit Capability (UCF) Factor and the 1995 INPO industry goal. UCF is defined as the ratio of the available energy generation over a given period of time to the reference energy generation (the energy that could be pro-duced if the unit were operated continuously at full power under reference ambient conditions) over the same time period, expressed as a percentage.

l The UCF was reported as 91.7% for the month of June 1992, i

The year-to-date average unit capability factor was reported as 43.7%.

The 1995 INPO industry goalis 80% and the industry upper ten percentile value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91) is approximately 84.1%.

[

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for Unit Capability Factor is 69.2%. The basis for this goal is 86 days for the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage,20 days rampup (10 full power equivalent days), unplanned loss of 11.5 full power equivalent days, and 10 day ramoup (5 full power equivalent days).

Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 12

O 1992 Monthly Unplanned Capabihty Loss Factor 90% -

-M-1992 Year-to Dato Averago Unplannod Capabikty Loss Factor IGOODI 80%-

M *-- 1991 Year to-Data Averago Unplanned Capability Factor 4

- O -- 1991 & 1992 Fort Calheon Goals

-a--

1995 INPO Industry Goal (4 5*/.)

~

-C}-

Industry Upper 10% (187% for a Throo Year Averago)

~

50% -

40%-

Cycle 14 30% -

Refueling Outage 20%~

~

10% -

n e

o o

c a=-c e

Lame

=s e.,*

i i

i a

i i - i ii e

i i

Ju!91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Unplanned Capability Loss Factor (UCLF), the Fort Calhoun UCLF goal for 1992, and the 1995 INPO industry goal. UCLF is defined as the ratio of the unplanned energy losses during a D ven period of time, to the reference i

energy generation (the energy that could he produced if the unit were operated continu-ously at full power under reference amb

onditions), expressed as a percentage.

The UCLF was reported as 8.3% for the month of June 1992. Unplanned energy losses for the month were due to the dropped control rod caused by a faulty clutch coil. The rod was dropped at 2305 on 5/31/92 and reactor shutdown commenced at that time, l

The generator was taken off-line at 0234 on 6/1/92 and the reactor was shutdown at 0330 the same day, i

l l

The reactor was brought critical on 8/2/92 at 0211 and the generator was on-line at 0852 on 6/2/92. The plant was returned to 100% power on 6/4/92, i r.e year-to-date average UCLF is 6.95%.

The 1995 INPO industry goalis 4.5% and the industry upper ten percentile value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91)is approximately 1.87%.

The Fort Calhoun goal for Unplanned Capability Loss Factor is 4.5%. The basis for this goalis an ur. planned loss of 11.5 full power equivalent days and 10 day rampup (5 full power equ; valent days).

- Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report l

Accountability: Patterson 1

Adverse Trend: None 13

O 1992 Montnly Planned Capability Loss Factor

-M-1992 Year to-Date Average PCLF

- + -- 1991 Year to-Date Average PCLF IGOOOl

-O-1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals -

t

-- O - Industry Median Vatue (18.3% for a Three Year Average)

Cycle 14 Refueling Outage 100% -

95-n J

em_

m m

h-70% -

y

. y 60%~

h: /

lW y[

a 50% -

N1 W

40% -

6 6_6-_c a

c o

an-a

- =

=

o o

o c

0 0

0

~0 M

r; lW p1, 0%

,r

, =>

, _ Apr '

May - Jun92-r

~T Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb-Mar PLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Planned Capability Loss Factor (PCLF), tha PCLF year-to-date monthly average, and the ': ort Calhoun yearly average goals for 1991 and 1992. PCLF is defined as the ratio'of the planned energy losses during a given period of time, to the referonce energy generation (the energy that could be pro-duced if the unit were operated continuously at full power under reference ambient conditions), expressed as a percentage.

The PCLF was reported as 0% for the month of June 1992. Energy losses for the month were due to the 6/1/92 through 6/4/92 outage to repair the dropped control _ rod and subscquent rampup. These energy losses were classified as unplanned.

The y_ ear-to-date-average monthly PCLF for 1992 is 49 4%

The 1992 Fort Calhoun yently a/erage l'"r id Capability Loss Factor goalis 26.3%

The basis for this goalis 86 days for the g de'14 Refueling Outage and 20 days rampup (10 full power equivalent days). The 1991 goal was 7%.

The PCLF industry median value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91) is 18.3%.

4 Data Source: Generat:on Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 14-

.. -. _.... -,.,,. ~....

3

i.

O Fuel Reliability indicator

~ -

1995 INPO Industry Goal (0.5 X 10 3 Microcur'- Grarn) l GOOD l

-C--

1992 Fort Calhoun Goal 4

4-E T

T;{

T G

16

?

M a

m w

c5 a

?*$

M k

3 h

j M;

E 9

g hi 5

T D

kh k

3 2-y

l#

1 7

M/

Cycle 14 4

E 4

T 1

rg Refuellng o

h h

k g

Outage K

db

.z?:

m tG g

1-k.

$b b

Ik b

k MN ss:-d-v$

8 S-O f';'

6

$li s-6 a

4-w i

m

',4 e

M e

a M

o i

i i

Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 i

FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) was reported as 7.51 X 10-4 microcuries/ gram for the month of June 1992. This compares to 7.07 X 10-4 microcuries/ gram for the month of May when the plant was in the startup mode for the beginning of full power life for the Cycle 14 core.

The June FRI was calculated using the data from June 7 through June 30. In accor-dance with the INPO definition of steady state operation, the plant was at power levels

]

above 85% during this time and the power levels did not vary more than + or - 5% for at least 3 days. Only the iodine concentration values from the days that meet this steady state criteria can be factored into the INPO fuel reliability indicator.

1 The last detected fuel failure was during Cycle 13. The FRI values observed during the later months of Cycle 13 were in the 2.5 X 10-3 to 3.9 X 10-3 microcuries/ gram range.

A Fort Calhoun goal of 7.5 X 10-4 microcuries/ gram will be utilized in 1992. Fort Cal-houn recognizes the INPO 1995 U.S. industry goal of 5.0 X 10-4 microcuries/ gram and will revise the annual FRI goal accordingly.

The FRI was not applicable while the plant was shutdown for the refueling outage in February, Ma ch and April, and was not reported during those months.

Data Source: Holthaus/Guliani Accountability: Patterson/Spilker Adverse Trend: None 15 1

-u--

y

--,--4 7--

a--

O Monthly Personnel Radiation Exposure L

Personnel Cumulative Radiation Exposure (Man Rem)

-@ Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (250 Man-Rem)

[

1995 INPO Industry Goal (185 Man Rem) 400 -

-D-Industry Upper 10% (118.5 Man Rem for a Three Year Average)

E 300-

=

k 276 C

O O

O 200-4 A

A i

i a

a A

i A

W D-O

--Q O-D-O-- O-D--O D--- -O O

93.4 100-52

[

Y

/

0 i

i i

i

'89 TO Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92

{

f COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE i

i During June 1992,1.838 man-rem was recorded by TLDs worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station. The year-to-date exposure is 228.296 man rem.

y The Fort Calhoun goal for personnel radiation exposure (cumulative) during 1992 is 250

~

man-rem. Cumulative radiation exposure for tne Cycle 14 Refueling Outage was 216.899 man-rem, which exceeds the outage goal of 210 man-rem. The goal was not achieved because the outage was longer thari anticipated and there was more expo-sure than expected due to the stuck reactor vessel stud and the thermal shield inspec-tion.

5 The 1995 INPO industry goalis 185 man-rem per year. The industry upper ten percen-t tile value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91) is aoproximately 118.5 man-rem per year. The three year average for Fort Calhoun Station from 1/89 through 12/91 is 140.4 man rem per year.

Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None SEP54 16 1

Cumulative Dry Active Waste Sent For Processing (in cuoic feet) 25000-i 20000-15000-10000-5000 -

0 3

Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May.lun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 O

Radioactive Waste Buried This Month (in cubic feet)

Cumulative Radioactive Waste Br ed

--O--

Fort Calhoun Goal For Waste B ied (3,000 cubic feet)

-b-1995 INPO industry Goal (3,884 cubic feet)

-D-Industry Upper 10% (2.118.5 cubic feet) m A

A A

-A A

A A

A 3000 -

0- -C 0

0 O

O O

O---C O

O -- - O

?

1334 1500-Whk

'm 0

i i

i

'90

'91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju!

Au: Sep Oct Nov Dec92 Year-end Total VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE l

The upper graph shows the volume of radioactive oil and dry radioactive waste sent for processing. The lower graph shows the volume of the monthly radioactive waste bur-ied, the cumulative annual total for radioactive waste buried, and the year end totals for radioactive waste buried the previous 2 years.

Cumulative amount of solid radwaste shipped off-site for processing (cubic feet) 19.520.0 Amount of scf.d radwaste shipped off-site for processing during June (cubic feet) 2,080.0 i

Volume of solid radioactive waste which was buried during June (cubic feet) 389.2 l

Cumulative vowme of sold radioactive waste buried in 1E'2 (cubic feet) 732.6 I

Amount of solid radioactive waste in temporary storage (cubic feet) 240.6 The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for the volume of solid radioactive waste which has been buried is 3,000 cubic feet. The 1995 INPO industry goalis 110 cubic meters (3,884 l

cubic feet) per year. The industry upper ten percentile value is approximately 60 cubic l

meters (2,118.5 cubic feet) per year.

Data Source: Patterson/Breuer (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bilau Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 17

~~

1992 Disabling injury /lliness Fiequirney Rate 1.6 -

-- X - 1991 Disabi:9g injury /fliness Frequency Hate IGOODI 1.4 -

Y i

--C)-

Fort Calhoun Goal (0.3) 4 1.2 -

--fr-199s INPO Industry Goal (0.5) j 1-

)

i l

n.8 -

4 5

h i

0.6 -

4 A--

A A

A j

0.4 -

i CW--C 3

0.2 -

0 M

3 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE) 1 This indicator shows the 1992 disabling injury / illness frequency rate. The 1991 dis-abling injury / illness frequency rate is also shown.

I The disabling injury / illness frequency rate for June was 0.64. There were no lost time accidents reported at the Fort Calhoun Station in June 1992. The to.al number of lost time accidents that have been reported during 1992 is 2. The 1992 disablir.g injury /

illness frequency rate goal was set at 0.30. The 1995 INPO Industry goalls 0.50.

The disabling injury / illness frequency rate for the past twelve months is 0.67.

The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury / illness fre ;uency rate is approxl.

mately 0,16.

Y_gm.

Year End Bate 1989 0.4 1990 0.5 -

1991 0.4 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Richard Adverse Trend: None SEP 25 & 26 18

..-_w,.__.--.--,,.-..,.

i1-i 1

1 d*

O Tnermat output I

--O-Fort Calhoun 1495 MW Goal

\\

Tech Spec 1500 MW Limit

==

4 i

J'l

)

l 1500-s

~

3; (:,

tM4 vg z ?..

.,A r

>,v

.d

,4.., '

7

.a y

___ - +, -

y e j -y a -

, x.. W

~->

t y J,.'

s

,5 if i. -

.j.

Si g; s:

+

y ep x

,s1,v.:

x

+

1200-Aw',

5 W, o 1

m}

a

w.

m

_ c h-s,n g.- e

, _3

{

s 9..,

);M by. $

3 _

> < j3M97 bv m

.s g

i -

n ;p,

s

. m t; t e. :=.-

e t'g,,

~/ '^

J-Yc eg 5'

y

.y.,.

L.:;.% 9 qJ 4-cg ac'.

(1 Jg900-sg j

y-q -

,~

"+

n 4,,. pfp$%

w %,%Q$%$ %m?Q g

1 Gi!

e M&m+W;&c^,.g

s p

'N-pa V#Q". CM. <

y, r.g

'?- %

p%

- mmm y%g %+., W klWh ~hm m.M-3-

3-~

v M "

i 600-M m

es...

A" i

.s %

u um -

e w.7; mm.e.%.;pwggen www

3

~

j W +p ~

%, @ JU -$$3; $ 13 %ddh.:,+ W I Jyp:;"2 (, %e,.

,no a m&c

,w nsa n.p

/ %' ?%W 'y^.2/*

np ?'$.,- y/m{f e 9a p w; wnw

.n Ri s

.me

+v s idb f3 d

Cilps4 WR4 3

-~ 13M c/

i.

rm.

s.s 2

+4- } %

>Q t'. f. -:

r,...m, a h W' w,;. ;...y%4-v r ?qs; e ~ 1 ..'t>

-:4 ' 4. y ) v -

W,% ".S.? W.' CfSUL &N_ ^ f 5 p;p r '.'c Af'+ - ' ;g:+' M l-,._. 5 m 4s4 -f k' : ' - - A W V A' -bw= +%L c \\ 'l, $ *? &., T,.mL m$lW.,/ 7.dW.9 e 4 i-. w Wl$e. =4,;8 ' > 1 ,7 4.g e.ap p y;, NEE $1? Y'\\#, DY 9 }" pyy , ;,;3pp , m gg p;.,. n ,L Y$q GJ \\; h ll@.. fj$kh,h? f' 'K { M;t.;, ff. g ;e$q y gy;3p;;'f'.:kl,,_ 4p wy + wv cg,n gpn,e s v:: c-a O l 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 i ? DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT 4 i The 6bove thermal output graph displays the daily operating power level during May { 1992, the 1500 thermal megawatt average technical specification limit, and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal. The power level began to decline on 5/31/92 at 2255 when Control Element No. 35 l dropped into the reactor core. The plant was returned to full power on 6/4/92, l Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source) i i' Accountability: Patterson/Trausch 4 Adverse Trend: None 1 4 4 5 19 i

2-1.0 - Equipment Forced Outage Rato 1.6 - -O-1992 Fort Calhoun Goal 1.2 - 1-0.8 - 03 0.50.6-0.4-0.13 ! 0.2 - O O O O -C O O O-C O O O i FEEL L i o I i i I '89 '90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1,000 CRITICAL HOURS The equipment forced outage rate per 1,000 critical hours was 0.92 for the months from January through June 1992. There was one equipment forced outaos during June due to a dropped control rod. The rod was dropped at 2305 on 5/31'92 and reactor shutdown commenced at that time. The generator was taken off-line at 0234 on 6/1/92 and was brought back on line at 0852 on 6/2/92. There was one equipment forced outage during May. This equipment forced outage occurred on May 14 when the turbine generator tripped on a falso high level moisture separator trip signal which caused a simultaneous reactor trip. The station batteries were declared inoperable in September through October 1991. In addition, two forced outages occurred during the rnonth of October 1991: on 10/18/91 the generator was taken off line due to a steam leak on e turbine control valve before seat drain line; on 10/25/91 the generator was taken off line due to a steam leak from an instrument tap on the high pressure turbine. One equipment forced outage occurred during the month of August 1991. The outage was required to replace a failed potential transformer (PT). This PT converted 345 KV to 120 V for use in the breaker synchronization circuit. One equipment forced outage occurred in the month of January 1991 due to the De-cember CEDM housing leak which carried outage time into January. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 0.2. Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs) Accountability: Patterson/ Jaworski Adverse Trend: None m

1 Operations 1992 Budget ($ Milhon) i 80- 1992 Cumulative Total ($ Malkon) 60-40 - 20-l O Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 92 1 40-Magtenance 1992 Budget ($ Milhon) 30- -N-1992 Cumulative Total ($ Million) 20-10 0-Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 OPEFinTIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The Operations and Malatenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year to date as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station. l l The budget year to date for Operations was 37,509,000 dollars for June 1992 while the actual cumulative expenditures throt,gh June totaled 33,173,000 dollars. The 1992 year end budget for op9 rations has been revised to 64,236,800 dollars, which is a reduction of 2,424,000 dollars. i l The budget year to-date for Maintenance was 13,882,700 dollars for June 1992 while the actual cumulative expenditures through June totaled 13,061,000 dollars. The 1992 year-end budget for maintenance has been revised to 18,342,600 dollars, which is an increase of 188,000 dollars. Data Source: Gleason/ Parent (Manager / Source) Accountability: Scofield 1 Adverse Trend: None 21

O Documents Schedulod for Review s00 - O Documents Reviewed O Overdue Documents 400-300-r h 1 7 j j 200 - 9 ^ h ] 9 3 h f 100-g f ? ~,* g 3 -a 2 2 A g a$ 7 x 7 z $j 2

3 A

g,. x

2 m

m_ 2 2 2 p 2 4 x o A-T ] "I l i i 4 I 6 i 4 4 1 4 1 i Jul91. Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun02 DOCUMENT REVIEW This indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month. These document reviews are performed in house and include Special Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Menual. During June 1992 there were 275 document reviews completed while 54 document reviews were scheduled. At the end of June, there were 47 document reviews overdue. During the month of June there were 55 new or renamed documents reviewed. These new or renamed documents will need to be reviewed again in 1994. Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None SEP 46 n .. -... ~

j. 1 I* Number of Failures /20 Demands - Trigger Values for 20 Demands O Number of Failures /So Domands -V-Triggor Values for So Domands 4 tL,;,d i Number of Failures /1oo Demands Trigger Values for 100 Domands .'.me si.- L e. Y k-Y V T T T Y l l 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 i = = =: = : = = = = = = --a = , af 22 22 : 2 2 ) 2-2 22 2 N t og 's 2 z t t 4 0 o i o o E 4 Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY This bar graph shows three monthly indicators pertaining to the number _of failures that were reported during the last 20,50, and 100 emergency diesel generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also shown are tr!gger values which correspond to a high level of confidence that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when the failure values are below the corresponding trigger val-ues. These trigger values are the Fort Calhoun 1992 goal. The demands counted for this indicator include the respective number of starts and the respective number of load runs for both Diesel Generators combined. The number of start domands includes all valid and inadvertent starts, including all start only demands and all start demands that are followed by load run demands, whether by automatic or manualinitiation. Load run demands must follow successful starts and meet at least one of the following criteria: a load run that is a result of a real load signal, a load run l test expected to carry the plant's load and duration as stated in the test specifications, l and a special test in which a diesel ger.erator was expected to be operated for a mini-l mum of one hour and to be loaded with at least 50% of design load (see exceptions and other demand criteria in the Definition Section of this report). l The demand failure which occurred during the month of August 1991 for DG 2 was due to a seal failure on the jacket water pump. Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source) Accountability: Jaworski/Ronning Adverse Trend: None 1 y

O DG 1 Falleres/25 Demands 5 DG 2 Failures /25 Demands 5- + Failure Trigger Value for 25 Demands / Fort Calhoun Goal 4-C O O O O O O O O O O O 3-2 2 2 2 2 2 f f. f 5* q t 1 j 1 1 1 1 1 t O op oe o o oE of o -1 oL o o. o. o g_ i I i I i i i I i i i I Ju!91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun02 DIESEL GENERAlOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS) This indicator shows the number of failures experienced by each emergency diesel generator during the last 25 start demands and the last 25 load run demands. A trigger value of 4 failures within the last 25 demands is also shown. This trigger value of 4 failures within 25 demands is the Fort Calhoun goal for 1991. It must be emphasized that in accordance with NUMARC criteria, certain actions will take place in the event that any one emergency diesel generator experiences 4 or more failures within the last 25 demands on the unit. These actions are described in the Definitions Section of this report. A Standing Order has been drafted for the Fort Cal-houn Station to institutionalize and forrnally approve / adopt the required NUMARC ac-tions. Diesel Generator DG-1 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 demands on the unit. Diesel Generator DG 2 has experienced one failure during the last 25 demands on the unit. A seal failed on a jacket water pump in August 199t. Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source) Accountability: Jaworski/Ronning Amerse Trend: None 24 _.~ _ _-

O Planned Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavailability @ Unplanned Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavailability O Estimated Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavailability E Planned Hours of Diesel Ger.srator No.1 Unavailability O Unplanned Hours of Diesel Generator No.1 Unavailabihty

200 -

3 j150- } j100-o 9.. E U ' 0-i i i i i i e i i i i i Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 ~ Q Curnulative Hours of DG 1 Unavailability for 1992 O Cumulative Hours of DG 2 Unavailability for 1992 10-9 7.9 hf 1. O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 i i i i i Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY This indicator provides a monthly illustration of diesel generator unavailability. The top graph shows the diesel generator planned, unplanned, and estimated unavailable hours for DG 1 and DG 2 for each month. The lower graph shows the cumulative hours of unavailability for each diesel generator for each month. On June 10, there were 9.0 hours of planned unavailability for DG-2 for re torqueing of radiator fan blade retaining bolts. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis a maximum of 210,82 hours of unavailability for each q diesel generator. Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source) Accountability: Jaworski/Ronning Adverse Trend: None s

. _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ ~ ~ Q ' March 1992 Outstanding MWOs O April 1992 Outstanding MWOs I O May 1992 Outstanding MWOs 300 C June 1992 Outstanding MWOs 'Programmate change to renect change in noncutage enteria. l 200- ~ s ~ pl 100-I 9 g; r n ,4 ,y U a.* i% d _,l .If kh hih ~ f 41.i-l O F)B h W) ?? , i 4 I I I I i 1 0 3 Montns 3 6 Months 6-9 Months - 912 Months >12 Months AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE) This indicator shows the age of corrective non outage maintenance work orders (MWOs) remaining open at the end of the reporting month. Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/ Robba Adverse Trend: An adverse trend is indicated based on increasing values for three consecutive months for outstanding MWOs 6 - 9 months old and 9 - 12 months old. 't his trend is due to the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage during February, March and April. l 4 l l- .,__-..-.--~-_._.,,-.._-_.:.___.____._-.u.,_._._

O ' March 1992 400 - O AprH 1992 i' 350 - 5', O May1992 If: O June 1992 300- </, '/, ,y M 'Prograwnate change to reft;;t change in nonetage miena. 250 - A // 200 - ( ~ 'p D: 150 - '/ Z 3 d': 0: Z 100 - '/, // O r '/, //, 50-o, II // y // /s // // '/s 2 S

2:

e i i i i Total Open MWOs Open MWOs>3 Total Open Safety Open Safety Open High Priority months old Related MWOs Related MWOs > 3 MWOs Months Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE) This indicator shows the total number of corrective non outage MWOs remaining open at the end of the reporting month, along with a breakdown by several key categories. The number of open MWOs >3 months old increased during March and April because on line activities had to be scheduled beyond the end of the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 g

D Corrective Maintenance Backlog > J Months Old lGOODI 80% - + Cycle 14 Refueling 60%- Q@[; he}t i P l ?,a 40 % u. ll

.f f,

V ny 7e I ( ..3 20% -< s&.- s c i l M c e. bi + u au ng Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb ' Mar Apr May Jun92 'Progran.matic change to rerect change in nonoutage criteria. CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON OUTAGE)- This indicator shows the percentage of open corrective non outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the e d af the reporting month. The percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of June 1992 was reported as 51.3% Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 i I l 1

~ 4%. O Preventive Maintenance items Overdue 1GOODI -O-1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals Y 3%- 2%- Cycle 14 Refueling Outage 1%- C O O O---53 pp r ,s M 0% Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in the administration and execution of preventive maintenance (PM) programs. A small percentage of preventive mainte-nance items overdue indicates a station commitment to the preventive maintenance program and an ability to plan, schedule, and perform preventive maintenance tasks as programs require. During June 1992,600 PM items were completed. 6 PM items (1.0% of the total 600) were not completed within the allowable grace period. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 0.5% per month of the preventive c maintenance items overdue. The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal was to have less than 1% per month of the preventive maintenance items overdue. Data Source: Patterson/Brady (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 41 m

b Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance Cycle 14 90%- O-1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Non Outago Goals Outage 80%- ~ A 4$. 5 y c 70%- l GOOD l D / w 4) O O 60%- 4 O O O O [ k !$5 h e m e T E5 S "IC m 50%- ^; C ? Z W R 7: g' !i .6 g 5 t 1; F 3 6 i 5' E T E ?.- E F S N.~, E' Ass b E.n U

5

.Y E E 40%- a" r w r ~. .. a m 1 s& W M w y a. m 7 ? us a aa 6 di ~: y} u g1 y a '?M, 9 if, %.I fM ' g-JX Jj;y 'y &jdj; Ei E M Py y ?]j g ifd... 8l$c[Q y jx a i y }y 30% - a L gh }e w W ,. ~ %i [ p W rn 20% - - Ju!91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec-Jan Feb Mar - Apr May Jun92 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL M AINTENANCE This indicator shows the ratio of completed non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non-outage maintenance. The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 53.4% in June 1992. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to attain a ratio of preventive to total ma!ntenance non-outage greater than 65%. Th_e 1991 Fort Calhoun goal was to attain a ratio of preven-tive to total maintenance greater than 60%. Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None SEP 41 29 ...,v.--,.~.-w-, --w,.4,er .. w c y, ~ev.,w-,.-,-r, -,,,..rg c-, ........r,-,,---w-.._r.,,.-,._,w%v...m,-..,-w ,,,---.,--,,,-i,,..-,,-w~.w_,-rryo-,,, r-

wes

O Maintenance Overtime 80%- lGOODI --X-12 Month Average Maintenance Overtirne 4 1 70%- - O - 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun *0n Line" Goals 60%- Cycle 14 50%- Refueling Outage 40%- 1 30% - C O O O O o 20% - 4 f M y 10%- y 9 x g O 0%- Jut 91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired mainte-nance activities with the allotted resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue. The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 4.8% during the month of June 1992. The 12 month average percentage of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 15.7 % The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for the "on-line" percentage of maintenance overtime hours worked is a maximum of 10% Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: None m

O Control Room Instruments Repairable On-Lino x 0 Total Number of Control Room Int.truments Out of Service 50- --O-1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals For Total Out of-Service Instruments 40- ~ 30- ~ 20- ~ 2 Nj [ 10- ~ 7 DQ--C O--- 0 l ? j7// '7,/" ~ 0-i Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 NUMBER OF OUT OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS This indicator shows the number of out-of service control room instruments, the number of instruments repairable during plant operations (on line), and the 1991 and 1992 Fort Calhoun goals. There was a total of 9 out-of service control room Instruments at the end of June 1992, 2 of these instruments require a plant outage to repair. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 13 out of service control room instru-ments. The 1991_ Fort Calhoun goal was to have less than 14 out of-service control room instruments. Data Source: Patterson/Spilker(Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: None 31

O Open irs Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance) } O Closed irs Related to thC Uso of Procedures (Maintenance) 15-O Procedural Noncompliance irs (Maintenance) Cycle 14 Refueling 10-Outage ?. 5 -- b 4 3 5 222 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 11 ') ~ 1 O / 0 ') 0 0 0 5 0 0 [ 00 00 0 0 000 0 0 i i i i i i i e i i i i Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov tsoc Ja, Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 PROCEDUR AL NONCOMPLI ANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE) This indicator shows the number of open Maintenance incident Reports (irs) that are related to the use of procedures, the number of closed irs that are related to the use of procedures, and the number of open and closed irs that received procedural noncom-pliance cause codes. There were no procedural noncompliance incidents for maintenance reported for the month of June 1992. Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 15,41 & 44 I 1

800-Open MWOs --O-1991 a 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals 600 - Cycle 14 Refueling Outage C O O O O 400-5 380 h 302 M f/j $y f 206 261 i{lil[4]ilE250 l Ju!91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE MAINTENANCE) This indicator shows the number of corrective non outage Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) that were open at the end of the reporting month. The 1992 goal for this indicator is to have less than 350 corrective non-outage mainte-nance work orders remaining open. The 1991 goal for this indicator was to have less than 450 corrective nori outage maintenance work orders remaining open. Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 34

!J* i i)' G Completed Schedulod Activities (EM) i j --e-Fort Calhoun Goal j 100 % - I 90%- 80%- ^ ^ fhf 70%- f So%- Cycle 14 Refueling Outage g g j 50% - 1 w l f 40%- y g i i 30% - IN h h I i 20% - g 1 o%- 18 ) 10 % I 0% j j 3/28 4/4 4/11 4/18 4/25 5/2 5/9 5/16 5/23 5/30.- 6/6 6/13 6/20 6/27 - i i PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES i (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE) i This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as 1 compared to the number of schsuuled maintenance activities concerning Electrical Maintenance. Maintenance activities includs MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities. J I Data for this indicator was not tracked during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage, j l The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%. l l Reoorting Month Comoleted Scheduled Act!vities [ Week 1 85% Week 2 82%' e i Week 3 78 % Week 4 86 % Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)- 4 i j Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trendi None - SEP 33 - g != s u....Jr.. .,..,,.,, - - -,... - ~. -,,,.., _,,. y, -y.c.w,,, ,e, ,,,,m- ,,,y.emew,,,,-gy,,,, e..y.,..h.,, ,,,_,-,e9.y g...,,,,4w.,,,w,y,q,7,,.,,pg,.,.,,.mg2 ~

i Q Completed Scheduled Activities (PE) l l .-O-Fort Calhoun Coal 100% - t f 90% - l 80% - Cycle 14 Refueling Outago 5 h 70%- 60%- i 50%- ( l 40%- k hl i N 30%- 20%~ Tgj p. 10% - 0%- 3/28 4/4 4/11 4/18 4/25 5/2 5/9 5/16 5/23 5/30- 6/6 6/13 6/20 6/27 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURF. EQUIPMENT) This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Pressure Equipment Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities. Data for this indicator was not tracked during the Cycle 14' Refueling Outage. The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%. Reoortino Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 82 % Week 2 81 % - Week 'i 81 % Week 4 88% Data Source: Petterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None -SEP 33 l' t 36 ~. ._..._,-.,__,_..-._a._...-._.._

D Comploted Schodulad Activities (GM) -- O - Fort calhoun Goal 100 % - SQ*4 - 80%- l M O O O 70 %- y N co.4 Cycle 14 Refueling Outage p f<* h Q =1 s h r 9" 50% ~ a wi 1Q 7 {e M h ] Ab%- E M 7

m.,

g w

=fh h w 20% 4 l M M v ll h*H 'U 0%c ij f ~ E l 3/28 4/4 4/11 A/iB 425 5/2 o.S 5/1G 5/23 5/30 6/0- 6/13 G/20 6/27 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (GENERAL MAINTENANCE) ) This ind cator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning General Mrjn-tenance. Maintenanc6 activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations and mis #'oner>us maintenance activities. Data for this indicator was not tracked during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%, Reoortina Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 69 % Week 2 64 % Week 3 - 52 % Week 4 56 % Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) - Accountability: Patiorson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 W. 1 b

D Comp!oted Scheduled ActMties (MM) 100% - -.O-Fort Calhoun Goal 90%- f 80%- ^ l(l 70% ~ Cycle 14 Refueling Outage 60%- 50%- 2 $$5

* " ~

30%- p 20%~ 4 g f 10%- 0% 3/28 4/4 4/11 4/18 4/25 5/2 5/9 ' 5/16 _ __5/23 5/30 6/6 6/13 6/20 6/27 DERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES - (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE) This indicator ebows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the numoer of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Mechanical Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscetaneous maintenance activities. Data for this indicator was not tracked during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80% Reoortina Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 70% Week 2 77% Week 3 76 % Week 4 90% Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 x

d Completed Schedulod Activities (IC) -C)-- Fort Calhoun Goal GO%- g 9 i i 80%- i Cycle 14 Refueling Outage g 79g, ty 4 60%- A 3 b ^ 50% - Q 40%- 30%~ 20% - ge h_

y

? 10%~ g

Q w

m 0% - T28-4/4 4/11 4/18 4/25 5/2 59 5/16 5/23 5/30 6/6 6/13 _G/20 6/27_ PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL) This indicator shows the peicent of the number of completed maintenance activities au compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Instrumenta-tion & Control. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities. Data for this indicator was not tracked during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this inGcator is 80%. i Reoortina Month Comoleigd Scheduled Activities Week 1 90 % Week 2 86 % Week 3 . 81 % Week 4 81 % Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) i Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trendi None SEP 33 m ~. - -.

3-O Number of Missed STs Resulting in LERs 2-1- i 1 l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 - 3 i i '90 '91 Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS This indicator shows the number of missed Surveillance Tests (STs) that result in Lic-ensee Event Reports (LERs) during the reporting month. The graph on the left shows the yearly totals for the indicated years. During the month of June 1992 there were no missed STs that resulted in LERs. The 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun goals for this indicator are zero. Data Source: Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs) Accountability: Patterson/Jaworski Adverse Trend:, None _ SEP 60 & 61' M -. - -. ~., - ~. -

-. - - -. _ - ~ _. . = - e 40- -.- Component Application -A-Total 30-25-j._g_g_g .a 20-76 1 15-v.-.-. ~.-.-. -~ 4_%;p J91 F M A M J J A S O N D J92 F M A M J92 O West OvV ging G Other Devices D Manufacturing Defect O Maintenance' Testing 55.0 %, 4, aw;c < 3, agf ingft O Engineering' Design Q Ettor Y, @lllY 9?Wg * & " #U?&CY? 2.0% ' f(b?{QhAffW 'Y'. N f-15.0% ! @ML / ~ ~ %qf / \\ 6.0% 11.0* =- ss11.0% COMPONENT FAILURE ANALYSIS REPORT (CFAR)

SUMMARY

This indicator shows the number of items with high failure rates for the 18 months from January 1991 through June 1992. The top chart illustrates the component, application and total failures for each month in the 18 month time period. The lower chart depicts the breakdown by cause categories (see the " Definitions" section of this report for de-scriptions of these cause categories) for each type of failure for the reporting month. The " component" portion of this indicator tracks the number of component categories (i.e. reciprocating pumps, feedwater pumps, motor operated valves, etc.) in which the Fort Calhoun Station has a higher failure rate than the rest of the industry. For the month of June, this value is 11. The " application" portion of this indicator tracks the number of application categorias (i.e. charging pumps, feedwater pump discharge valves, etc.) in which the Fort Calhoun. Station has a higher failure rate than the rest of the industry. For the month of June this value is 9. Increases in the number of component and application failures in June were due to failures found during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source) Accountability: Jaworski/ Dowdy Adverse Trend: None I 41

I -R-Greater Than One Failure 40- -+- Greater Than Two Failures + Greater Man me FaHurcs j 35- ) 1 30-N j 25- "g N ~ f 20-15-10- ? ? ? i 5-j 0 i l Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 j NUMBER OF NPRDS MULTIPLE FAILURES This indicator shows the number of multiple NPRDS reportable failures over the preced-ing eighteen months sorted by component manufacturer and model number. The indica-tor 13 divided into three parts: manufacturer model numbers with more than one failure in eighteen months, manufacturer model numbers with more than two failures in eigh-teen months, and manufacturer model numbers with more than five failures in eighteen months. During the past eighteen months, there were 21 model types that had more than one failure in eighteen months.10 of these had more than two failures. 4 component types, General Electric 50 570-01 power supplies, Gaulin P18 pumps, Byron Jackson 28RXL pumps and Jayco incorporated 150 valves had more than five failures. The model types with more than two failures are: General Electric AK 2A-25 circuit breakers (3 failures), the QSPDS (3 failures), Faulk Type Y couplings (3 failures), Byron Jackson 28RXL pumps (6 failures), Gaulin P18 pumps (9 failures), General Electric 50 570 power sup-plies (4 failures), General Electric 50 570-01 power supplies (8 failures), General E:ac-tric 12HEA61 relays (3 failures), Jayco incorporated 150 valve b (6 failures) and the pressurizer (4 failures). Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source) Accountability: Jaworski/ Dowdy Adverse Trend: None c ~ ~.

Components With More Than One Failure lGDDDI + X Components With More Than Two Failures 20-15-10-5- v v v v X ( >( ) 0 Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS The Maintenance Effectiveness Indicator was developed following guidelines set forth by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Opera-tional Data (NRC/AEOD). The NRC/AEOD is currently developing and verifying a maintenance effectiveness indicator using the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) component failures. This indicator has been revised to show the number of NPRDS components with more thar$ one failure during the last eighteen months and the number of NPRDS compo-nents with more than two failures during the last eighteen months. The number of NPRDS components with more than two failures in an eighteen month period should indicate the effectiveness of plant maintenance. (This change applies only to the Sep-tomber 1991 through June 1992 data. The data.or July through August 1991 is based on a twelve month interval.) During the last 18 reporting months there were 11 NPRDS components with more than 1 failure. 3 of the 11 had more than two failures. The tag numbers of the components with more than two failures are B/PO-905, CH 1 A and CH-18. Data Scurce: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None \\ c

4 1C 10- - Calculated Check VeNe Failure Rate per Million Component Hours 9- --6-- Industry Check Valve Failure Rate per Million Component Hours J 8-l -O-Fort Calhoun Goa' 7-IGOODI 6-y- l 9u; 5 - 4-I }{ g 3- __p4 ~ 2-C O O O O O O O O 1 1 b / Q I 0 i i i i '89 '90 '91 Ju!91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 Check Vatve Failures CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE This indicator shows the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate, the Fort Calhoun goal and the industry check valve failure rate. This rate is based upon failures during the previous 18 months. The check valve failures at Fort Calhoun Station for the previous three years are shov,n on the left. The data for the industry check valve failure rate is three months behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the data. For March 1992, the Fort Calhoun Station reported an actual check valve failure rate of 6.18 E 7, while the industry reported an actual failure rate of 2.96 E-6. At the end of June 1992, the Fort Calhoun Station reported a calculated check valve failure rate of 6.22 E 7. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a maximum failure rate of 2.00 E-6. Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source) Accountability; Jaworski/Rollins Adverse Trend: None SEP 43 i 44 l

O Secondary System CPI -O-Fort Calhoun Goal (A5) 1995 INPO Industry Goal (0.30) 1.5 - l Secondary System CPI Umit -O-Industry U; per 10% (0.20) 1- -l l l l l l 9 l l Cycle 14 0.5 ~ Refueling o.n ou O -O-Q-O-O-O-O Outage U-Q yg 6Z 6 2 6Z8Z8 Z 8 2 6 $Z6 u i i 10 i 89 w Ju!91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar. Apr May Jun92 5%- O % of Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidelines 3%- Cycle 14 Refueling Outage 0% ~ i i i i i i i i i i i i Jul91 Aug Sep-Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY The top graph, Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI),is calculated using the following three parameters: cation conductivity in steam generator blowdowr sodium in steam generator _ blowdown, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen. The bottom graph shows the percent of total hours of 13 parameters exceed-ing the Owners Group (OG) guidelines during power operation. The CPI was reported as 0.554 for ths month of June 1992. The percent of hours outside the OG guidelines was reported as 0.05% for the month of June 1992. The 1991 & M92 Fort _Calhoun goals for the CPI are 0.45. The INPO 1995 Industry goalis 0.30 ; he industry upper ten percentilo value for this indicator was approxi-mately 0.20 for 1991. Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson!Schmidt Adverse Trend: None .g

i. 1 s J { 10% - j Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit = j j -O-Fort Calhoun Goal-8%- 4-i i 4 i 6%- l ~ ? 4 4%- { Cycle 14 2%- C O O O--C O G Reftaling C O l g Outage f R 0% l Jul91 .v. > ; Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 l l PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT l The Primary System Chemistry -~ Percent of Hours Out of Limit indicator tracks the l primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters, i _ Typically, lithium is the parameter that is out of limit.100% equates to all six i ram, eters being out of limit for the month. l-The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as 1_.11% for the month of June 1992, i A plant outage iri November and December 1990 resulted in a higher percentage of hours out of limit. l The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a maximum of 2%. _ The'1991 goal was a maximum of 2%. ) i Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/ Smith l Adverse Trend: None 3 i l=w--, ,= =,- en, ..e,v 4 ,+-.----.,v-m ,.e--.er.,-.,3-sr-+- ,rr++,-w = c e yws e,+,.re-e siw w w s --rmm-,,- m* e - w - w www =, e rw w w-

- -. ~. l. j, .10% - l % of Hours Auxiliary System (CCW) Chemistry is Outside Station Limits i -O-1991 Industry Upper Ouartile 8%- b i f 6%- 4%- i j Cycle 14 2% - Refueling l Outage I O O C C O O O O o% i i i '89 90 Jul91 Aug Sep Oct ~Nov Dec Jan. Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 i AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUTSIDE l STATION LIMITS i l The Auxiliary System Che_mistry Percent of Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks i the monthly hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside the j station chemistry limit. l 4 The auxiliary system chemistry percent of hours outside station limits was reported as - 0% for the month of June 1992, The last out of station limits condition occurred in June-l 1991 and was due to a low nitrite level in CCW coolant. l The 1991 Fort Calhv n goal for this indicator was a maximum of 2%. l [ Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)- I Accountability: Patterson/ Smith } _ Adverse Trend: None i i i f.. l. 4 g r i-

j B Number of instruments Out-of-Service 26- --O-Fort Calhoun Goal 24-22-20 l 20-18 18-17 l 16-15 1S 15 i 14- '12 - 10- ! 5 l l l 8-6 6 6 y +5% q w p q 6-l -,-j --s ~ i 0 Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June 92 IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE This indicator shows the total number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of-service at the end of the reporting month. The chemistry systems involved in this indicator include the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS). 4 At the end of June there was a total of 24 in-line chemistry instruments that were out of-service. Of these 24 instruments,19 were from the Secondary System and 5 were from PASS. r.iost of the out-of-service instruments are at the secondary sample panel due to a combination of alarms not being operable and failure of one of the actualinstruments. The increase that occurred after November 1991 in the number of Seconoary instru-ments out of service is due to a new method of determining if an instrument is out of. service. The entire instrument channelis considered inoperative it: 1) the instrument is incperative,2) the chart recorder associated with the instrument is inoperative,3) the alarm function associated with the instrument is inoperative. This change was made because if any of the functions named above are not operational, then the instrument is = not performing its intended function. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in-line chemistry system instruments that. are out-of service has been set at 6. Six out-of-service chemistry instruments make up 10% of all the chemistry instruments that are counted for this indicator. Data Source: Patterson/Renaud (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Jaworski Adverse Trend: An adverse trend is indicated based on three consecutive months of - increasing values for this indicator. This trend is because of the failure of several analyticalinstruments;it is not due to the failure of sample sequences. t

l. Q ; Total Waste Produced (Kilograms) - Federal & State Monthly Limit (Kg) 1000-l i j 800 - i 1 i 600 - { 400 - l l 200 - 154.5 150 155 1 n l ' d l 1 0 0 0 0 I o 0-g,ff) 0 0L i i i i i i i i i i i i Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar - Apr May Jun92-HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED This indicator shows the total amount of hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun each month. This hazardous waste consists of non halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced. l During the month of June 'i992,0.0 kilograms of non-halogenated hazardous waste was produced,155 kilograms of halogenated hazardous waste was produced, and 0.0 l kilograms of other hazardous waste was produced. The amount of halogenated hazardous waste increased in December 1991 because of i-a change in the method of record keeping. Hazardous waste is no longer counted on a j monthly basis, It is counted based upon a full drum of waste. j Date Source: Patterson/Henning (Manager / Source) ). Accountability: Patterson/Henning i l Adverse Trend: None i l r i e 7 9_m.-9 _-p.. ++t gy---gr - W itm.yy+ +r ~g my-3 y gye g-y+.,--,my. 9g-y-gy.,y-ww p.g pgw--i 9,w,- p-ggwy em-yg. ytw.r-,si.--wnv->-.ymee

O Highest Exposure for the Month (mrem) @ Highest Exposure for the Quarter (mrem) E Highest Exposure for the Year (mrem) ~ OPPD 4500 mrem /yr. Umit 4000-3000 - 2000-1707 1000-0 l June MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE During June 1092, an individual accumulated 104 mrem which was the highest indi - vidual exposure for the month. The maximum individual exposure to date for the second quarter of 1992 was 647 mrem. The maximum individual exposure reported for the year 1992 was 1,707 mrem. The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem / year. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis 1,500 mrem / year. Date Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None m

[] Monthly Personnel Contaminations Cumulative Personnel Contaminations lGOODI Y 300- -O-Fort Calhoun AnnualGoal(144) 250 - Cycle 14 237 Refueling Outage 200-150-C O --C O O O O O O O O 101 100-H n an 50- ? e 25 O E ^ 0 i i i SO 31 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS This indicator shows the number of skin and clothing contaminations for the reporting month. A total of 224 contaminations have occurred during 1992. There was a total of 55 skin and clothing contaminations in 1991. There was a total of 237 skin and clothing contaminations in 1990. The 1992 goal for skin and clothing contaminations is 144. Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 54 51 1

l G Decontaminated Radiation Controlled Area g 100% - GOODI -O-Fort Calhoun Goal (non-outage months) l l Cycle 14 i Refueling 90%- Outage - lr i C ([ ~~ fn g ) (=;r 80%- O:

e i

I. ) i-J.:. - g! b5 f$ 70%- h. ~..: : I$ (*; ll h ^ j r,a l 60%- j 4 g ,g ( t-j c c-w- 3 O g 0 M 50% '~ l Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr - May Jun92 l DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA i l-This indicator shows the percentage of the RCA that is decontaminated (clean) based on the total square footage, a 1991 Fort Calhoun goal of 85% decontaminated RCA for non-outage months and a 1992 goal of 88% decontaminated RCA for non outage months. i-l At the end of the reporting month,87.0% of the total square footage of the RCA was-decontaminated. !~ Date Source:- Patterson/Gundal (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 4 n..--..........--.. ...... m.... -

@ Number of identified PRWPs 1 80-Cycle 14 70 - Refueling Outage 60-59 50-40-39 30-20-b 10-4 4 0 i -- i i i i i i i i i i i i Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Ma'/ Jun92 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The Radiologic.al Work Practices Program Indicator shows the number of Poor Radio-logical Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the reporting month. The PRWPs are identified through a review of the monthly Radiological Occurrence Reports and Personnel Contamination Reports. The number of PRWPs which are identified each month should indirectly provide a means to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance. During the month of June 1992,1 PRWP was identified. The numbers of PRWPs for the months of February, March and April are higher than the numbers reported for previous months due to the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None SEP 52 53 l

O icta! Number of Hot Spots O Number of Additional Hot Spots identified Cumulative Hot Spots Removed O Removal Planned 75- -O-199 Fort Calhoun Goal for Hot Spota Removed l ? f 50 - 1 1 l 25- ; f 3 1 1 a I -4 0 ~ i i i i i i i i i i i i Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec92 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS This indicator shows the total number of hot spots which have been identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been documented through the use of a hot spot identification sheet. A hot spot is defined as a smalllocalized source of high radiation. A hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item or piece of equipment is at least 5 times the General Area dose rate and the item or piece of equipment's dose rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem / hour. At the end of June, there were 62 hot spots identified. 33 of these hot spots were con-sidered permanent, i.e. hot spots which are not significant dose contributors or are cost prohibitive for removal.1 hot spot was removed in the Corridor 26 BAST area and no new hot spots were identified during the month. Removalis planned for 18 hot spots.12 hot spots are still under evaluation. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to remove one hot spot per month. Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None 51

i -8 Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies) 800 - j Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies) j --O-Cumulative Annua! Goal (Curies) 600 - lGOODI i V j 465 1 P m f $ 400-b C O O O O O O O O W l h ~ 200 - 164 e la ll l ' t ** 0 1 4 I i i I 4 6 I i i 'I t I i 3 l '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju. - Aug Sept Oct. Nov Dec91 l GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT. i l The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for Janu-l ary 1,1991 through December 31,1991. A total of 358.5 curies have been released to i the environment during this time. i In September,238.236 curies of gaseous radioactive waste was released to the envi-' ronment due to containment purges required during the unscheduled maintenance outage. Most of the radioactive waste was released in the form of Xenon 133. The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 was 340 curies for this indi-cator. l i The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every. i six months. Data Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source) l j. Accountability: Patterson/Trausch Adverse Trend: None s l l

8 Monthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged lGOODI -O-Cumulative AnnualGoal Y 300 - 231 228 C 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 200 - 175 ~ h-m E fy + qq 100 - ) 33'9 18.2 22.7 Qf]' yy g "9.1 Fg' "5.3 2.3 8.4 6.3 F/ 4.8 8.3 sg 4'^'i ^ 0 i i 6 7 I '4 I i 4 e i i i I '88 d9 90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Au0 Sept Oct Nov Dec91 LIQUID R ADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for January 1,1991 through December 31,1991. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environment from all sources totaled 176.1 curies during this time. The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 was 225 curies. l The liquid radioactive waste being disonarged to the environment is calculated every six months. Data Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None i J

I D Non System Failures l GOOD l .30-- V - 25 - 20- .17g 15-10-8 gg 7 5 kid !N N lEM 0~ r. 0 i i i. . i i i i i i Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 l GOOD l 80-73 k 70- fin 60 - 56 52 50-l 43 40-33 30-G 28 20- [. (- [/; p'g 10-0 g i i Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 LOGG ABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) The Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) Indicator is depicted in two separate graphs. The top graph depicts the total number of loggable/ reportable non-system failures concerning Security _ Badges, Access Control and Authorization, and Security Force Error, and Unsecured Doors. The bottom graph shows the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning system failures which occurred during the reporting month. During the month of June 1992, there were 33 loggable/ reportable incidents identified. Syrem failures accounted for 28 (85%) of the loggable/ reportable incidents, and 8 (29%) of these were environmental failures.- Of the 10 microwave alarm failures iden11-fled,7-were attributed to one zone. The problem was caused by a faulty receiver which has been repaired.- Data Source: Sefick/Woerner(Manager / Source)- Accountability: Sefick Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 g.

- - _. -. ~ [ O Maren 92-t - g 0 WM l % g5_ i q g Q. May 92 O ij { Q June '92 " 20 - . j e E t r-Si 15 - 8 O 10- ? 7-l @5-i W-3 1 2 l S 1 1 1 1 1 1-E // l\\ 0-0 0 i i i i i 0i _i 0 i ;,,. i g0 e l cc Badges Access Control Security Force Error Unsecured Doors SECURITY NON SYSTEM FAILURES ?: l This indicator shows the number of loggable/ reportable non-system failures for the i reporting month. These items include: Security Badges, Access Control and Authoriza-l tion, Security Force Error, and Unsecured Doors. Non-System Failures Number of incidents June '92 May '92 i j Security Badges 2-Access Control and Authorization 0 0 Security Force Error' -1 0 iI Unsecured Doors - 1-Q'- Total 5 2 4 Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source) Accountability: Sefick R Adverse Trond: None SEP 58 SB

. ~. O Environmental O Failure IGOODl 20 - 15-10-7 a rg; fhh;$' 5-3 3 2 2 ~' 0 i i i i i Alarms CCTV Computer Search Equipment Doors 0 1991 System Faiiures a 1992 System Failures IGOODI t 100-82 84 80 - 73 77 70 67 60 - 56 58 E 52 53 53 56 43 42 40-33 28 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES This indicator shows the number of loggable/ reportable system failures for the reporting month. These items include: Alarm System Failures, CCTV failures, Security Computer Failures, Search Equipment Failures and Daor Hardware Failures. Alarm systems and CCTV failures will be divided into two categories: environmental failures and failures as defined in the performance in_dicator definitions. Also, the 1991 and 1992 System Failures will be compared on a monthly basis. I System Number of Incidents June '92 M av '92 Environs Failures Envirorig Failures Alarms 7 10 -4 12 CCTV 1 2 4 3 Computer N/A .3 ~ N/A 5 Search Equipment N/A 3 N/A 1 Door Hardware N,3 2 N!% a Totals 8 20 8 25 Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager /Sourcc) Accountability: Sefick/Patterson Positive Trend SEP 58

10'<'. - g Amount of Work On Hold Awaitirg Parts y 9%- --O-1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals - 8%- 7%- 6% - Cycle 14 Refueling 5%- Outage 4%- O O O O O O O 3%- i ' l lI l 'a n ! s R Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb _ Mar Apr May Jun92 AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON-OUTAGE) This procurement indicator displays the percentage of open, non-outage maintenance items that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total amount of open, non outage mainte-nance items. There was a total of 947 open, non outage maintenance work orders (MWOb) with 20 (2.1%) of these MWOs on hold awaiting parts at the end of the reporting month. The 1991 and 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals for this indicator are to have less than 3.5% of the total number of open, non-outage MWOs awaiting parts. Data Source: Willrett/ CHAMPS (Manager / Source) Accountability: Willrett/Fraser Adverse Trend: None m J

20-Spare Parts Inventory Va ue ($ Million) 15-m jo_ 5-0 i Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The spare parts inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of June 1992 was reported as $12,402,666. Data Source: Steele/Huliska (Manager / Source) Accountability: Willrott/McCormick Adverse Trend: None - Spare Parts issued ($ Thausands) 800-600 - 400-200-0l i Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May. Jun92 SPARE PARTS ISSUED The value of the spare parts issued during June 1992 totaled $120,135.74; The value of the spare parts issued for November and December 1991 was not available due to a printer problem. Data Source: Steele/ Miser (Manager / Source) Accountability: Willrett/McCormick. Adverse Trend: None m

D Inventory Accuracy -O-Fort Calhoun Goal (98%) EB11~trtTrrit Ju!91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 INVENTORY ACCURACY This indicator shows the accuracy of the actual parts count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained in the MMIS computer system for the reporting month. During June, 902 different line items were counted in the warehouse. Of the 902 line items counted,56 items needed count adjustments. The inventory accuracy for the month of June was reported as 94%. The Fort Calhoun 1991 & 1992 goals for this indicator are 98%. Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source) Accountability: Willrett/McCormick Adverse Trend: None % of Fick Tickets Generated When Parts are not E Available, etc. l, 6%- -- O - Fo t Calhoun Goal 5%- 4%- A O O O O O y Q-I L _h_@$_M P24 El nel rei om R91 jug 1 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 STOCKOUT RATE This indicator shows the percentage of the number of Pick Tickets generated when the amount of parts requested is equal to or less than the minimum stocking level and parts are not available. During June 1992, a total of 688 Pick Tickets were generated. Of the 688 Pick Tickets generated, 8 Pick Tickets (1.2%) were generated when the amount of pans requested was equal to or less than the minimum stocking level and parts were not available. The Fort Calhoun 1992 goal for this indicator is 2.6% and the 1991 goal was 2.0%. Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source) Accountability: Willrett/McCormick Adverse Trend: None m

=. O % of Total PutAases that aro Expedited 0-- 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals (0.5%) 4%- Cycle 14 Refueling. Outage ~ 3%~ h 2%- L? ut em w lE 1 % -- D D E5 I m

ye m

l o-rG--c 0 o-6--o-6 6 o - _c o e w -v w a I 0% i i i i i i i i i i i i i i Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec.Jan Feb-Mar. Apr May Jun92 EXPEDITED PURCHASES This indicator shows the percentage of expedited purchases compared to the total number of purchase orders generated during the reporting month. During June, there was a total of 302 purcnase orders generated.- Of the 302 purchase-orders generated, none were expedited purchases. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 0.5% The 1991 goal was 0.5%. The number of expedited purchases was above the Fort Calhoun goal during the. months of February, March and April 1992 due to the ordering of items related to the - Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. .Date Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source): Accountability: Willrett/Fraser-Adverse Trend: None g

i 100-80-60-40-30 20-7 0, Service invoices COE invoices Mlscoilaneous s INVOICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the number of service invoices, COE invoices, and miscellaneous i invoices for the month of June 1992. i Date Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source) Accountability: Willrett/Fraser Adverse Trend: None l = g Percentage of Material Requests for issue with the Roquest Dette the same as the Need Date ~ 100*/. - --O-~ 1991 Fort Cainoun Goat 80%- 60% - C O O O O O-i i i 40% - ( h w o, Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May. Jun92 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING This indicator shows the percentage of material requests (MRs) for issue with their request date the same as their need date compared to tne total number of MRs for issue for the reporting month. The 1991 goal of 60% is also shown. During the month of June, a total of 688 MRs were received by the warehouse. Of the 688 total MRs received by the warehouse, 83.7% of the MRs (576) were for issue with their request date the same as their need date. Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source) Accountability: Willrett/McCormick Adverse Trend: None ~ M ~.

t SM-O Totai Modification Packages Open 420 425 l 400 - 337 i 1 !) 300 - 286 287 p 7{ 274 270 g 76 yh Q F@: $ 1 25' y ik 0 b N N b E N 3 109 200 - l3 h k $ k$ $ $ 5 $ 'l* $ Ik d Ny 1 Y$ R M SE h fl& Si m B ?@

W 4

-) E ig W $2 4 M w Ry 23 E Nd 'l4 M dh }}E J 8 3$ 1M 3 i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i '88 '89 '90 Jul91 Aug Sep Oct 'Jov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding modifications (exclcdina outstand: ino modifications which are croposed to be cancelled). Cateaorv Reoortina Month Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress ~ 20 Mod. Requests Being Reviewed 22 Design Engr. Backlog /in Progress 66 Construction Backlog /In Progress 29 Desian Enar. Uodste Backloclin Proctess 39 Total 176 At the end of June,40 additional modification requests had been issued this year and 13 modification requests had been cancelled. The Nuclear Projects Review Committee (NPRC) had completed 95 backlog modification request reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) had completed 82 backlog modification request reviews this year. Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source) Scofield/Lounsbery (Manager / Source) Accountability: Scofield/Phelps Positive Trend s l

O Temporary Modifications >1 cycle old (RFO required for Removal) O Temporary Modifications >s montns oid (Removabie on-iine) -O-- Fort Calhoun Goal for Temporary Modifications >1 cycie old (0) 6-5- 4-3- 2 -2 2 h / !lll$3l $d '~ 0 April '92 May '92 June'92 TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING) This indicator provides information on the number of temporary modifications greater than one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage (RFO) for removal and the number of temporary modifications removable on-line that are greater than six months old. Also provided is the Fort Calhoun goal for temporary modifications. There are currently no temporary modifications that are greater than one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage to remove. In addition, at the end of June there were 2 temporary modifications installed that were greater than six months old that can be removed on-line. These were: handjack close of CCW/RW valves, in which OPS is reviewing a system engineering suggestion for closure; and potable water supply piping temporary repair, which is awaiting completion of MWOs 921203,921204, and 921205 currently not scheduled. At the end of June, there was a total of 21 TMs installed in the Fort Calhoun Station. 6 of the 21 installed TMs require an outage for removal and 15 are removable on-line. In 1992 a total of 44 temporary modifications have been installed. Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source) Accountability: Jaworski/Gorence Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 & 71 m ( -___J

60 - @ April 92 50-O May 92 40-O June'92 30-20-N^ 10-3 3-2 1 o 2 1-egg 0 ' - ~ i 0 3 months 3-6 months >6 months System Engineering 60 - @ April'92 ( 50 - 47 O May s2 43 u 42 40-i 38 $ECf Q June '92 35-h- syyp: + m m ci 30-26 26 25 10-f $"W$ k

~

/ , ' *"m 0 m ? hw k i o-3 months 3-6 months >6 months Design Engineering ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST (EAR) BREAKDOWN This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of EARS assigned to Design Engineer-ing and System Engineering awaiting a technical response from engineering, At the end of June 1992,32 EARS had been resolved and were going through the closecut process There were 3 EARS awaiting a technical response from Nuclear Projects. Total EAR breakdown is as follows: EARS opened during the month 15 EARS closed during the month 30 Total EARS open as of the end of the month 170 Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti (Manager / Source) Accountability: Jaworski/Phelps Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 s

j ~ B ECNs Backlogged in DEN 350 - O ECNs Opened During the Month @ ECNs Completed During the Month 300 - l 250 - Cycle 14 Refueling Outage 200 - Jut 91 Aug Sep_ Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS This indicator shows the number of Engineering Change _ Notices (ECNs) awaiting completion by DEN, the number of ECNs opened during the reporting month, and the number of ECNs completed by DEN during the reporting month. At the end of June 1992, there was a total of 170 DEN backlogged open ECNs. There were 44 ECNs opened, and 53 ECNs completed during the month. Although the number of open ECNs is currently high, activities are in progress to reduce the backlog of open ECNs. It is expected that the number of open ECNs will continue to decrease. Data Source: Phelps/Pulvere_nti (Manager / Source) Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski - Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 m

_ _.~ _ _ .~ : i I O DEN. Engineering not complete sgtem Engineering Engineering complete, response under review l Maintenance - MWO scheduled, but work not complete i G Maintenance - MWO complete, awaiting closeout f-59 1 I 5 I DE(( fj i 2 21 21 27 {$N j !. l 1 0 0 l: 0l [2 1 I l l 0 - 3 months 3 - 6 months > 6 months ECN FACILITY CHANGES _OEEN O DEN Engineering not ecmplete O system En,c oering - Engineering compieto, response under review @ Maintenance MWO scheduled, but work not complete } O. Maintenance - MWO complete, awaiting cioseout i 76 57-32 E ? 24 21 j;fg"[{ l 1. >- al 3 1 2 8 14 i j O 3 months 3 - 6 months > 6 monthe j ECN SUBSTITUTE REPLACEMENT ITEMS OPEN } 4 J E DEN - Engineering not complete j O system Engineering - waixdown or confirmation noi compiete 70-58 60-50-37 l 40-4 30-20-12 to j 1 - 1 gwwxy 1 p. 0 - 3 months 3 - 6 months > 6 months 4 ECN DOCUMENT CHANGES OPEN j-ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) that are assigned to Design Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engineering, and Maintenance for the reporting month. The graphs provide data on ECN Facility _ Changes Open, ECN Substitute Replacement items Open,' and ECN Document Changes Open. Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti(Manager / Source) Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 m i ~..., - - , _.. - - ~ _ _. - - _ -.. _ m. -. -. -.. - - ~ -

1 ~ j 1992 Recoroable injury / Illness Frequoney' Rate

l 1

s-IGOODI j X 1991 Recordable injury /lliness Frequency Rate y .l 4.5 - -- O - 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal (2.0) } 4-i I 3.5 - i j 3-2.5 - i 2-O C C -- C C C O 1.5 - i f l~ a j 0.5 - i 0 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY RATE i This indicator shows the 1992 recordable injury / illness cases frequency rate. The 1991 recordable injury / illness cases frequency rate is also shown. i' A recordable injury / illness case is reported if Nuclear Operations Division personnel are injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid. The record-able injury / illness cases frequency rate is computed on a year-to-date basis. I The recordable injury / illness rate for June 1992 was reported as 2.23. There was' 1 recordable injury / illness case, a strained neck, reported during the month of June. i There has been a total of 7 recordable injury / illness cases in 1992.- The recordable injury / illness rate for the past twelve months is 2.84. i. The 1992 goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 2.0. Year-Recordable Cases Year-End Rate 1989 11 2.2 1990 11 2.1. 1991 18 3.3 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source) Accountability: Richard p Adverse Trend: None SEP 15,25 & 26 m i.

~ Licensee Event Reports 46 [] Personnel Errors Reported in LERs Cumulative Licensee Event Reports -+- Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 32 31 29 30-26 i j I l; I 20-14 12 9 _ 10-mA y { s 5 5-6 6 I 0-- b ~~~ b i i i i.i i i i 4. i i '88 '89 '90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 NUMBER O? PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERS This indicator sho.vs the r: umber of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) submitted during each month of 1992, the LERs attributed to personnel errors for each month, and the cumulative totals of both. The year end totals for the four previous years are also shown.- In June, there was'a total of 3 LERs reported, one of which was attributed to licensed - personnel error. Data Source: Short/Eid (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson - Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 i. 1

l O _ Administrative Control Problem 5-l 0 Licensed Operator Error @ Other Personnel Error i i 4- @ Maintenance Problem 5 Design / Construction / Installation / Fabrication Problem @ EquipmentFailures 3-i i j 2-1 I i 1-l i E E E E E E l E E I I I I L 4 I I I I I I Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the LERs by report date broken down by Root Cause Code for each of the past twelve months from July 1,1991 through June 30,1992. l The cause codes are intended to identify possible programmatic deficiencies. In order to be consistent with industry reporting, the Root Cause Codes have been revised to reflect the NRC's sequence coding. For detailed descriptions of these codes, see the L " Performance Indicator Definitions" section of this report. Data Source: Short/Eid (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 72

O Actual Division Staffing 600 - 542 ssa O Authorized Division Staffing , ; W:!, 400-E@ h 200 205 200-y sy' 50 51 0 Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Nuclear Services STAFFING LEVEL The authorized and actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions. Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source) Accountability: Waszak Adverse Trend: None SEP 24 -O-Nuclear Operations Division Turnover Rate Production Engineering Division Turnover Rate 10%- -O-Nuclear Services Division Turnover Rate 6%- O 4%- g 2% - c c c o--c 0% F91 Ms1 A91 M91 J91 J91 A91 591 091 N91 D91 J92 F92 M92 A92 M92 J92 PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The turnover rates for the three Divisions are calculated using only resignations from OPPD. Division Turnover Rate NOD 2.2% PED 4.0% NSD 0.0% Currently, the OPPD corporate turnover rate is being reported as approximately 2.5%. This OPPD corporate turnover rate is based on the turnover rate over the last four years. Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source) Accountability: Waszak Adverse Trend: None q l J

00-O Totni noquaiitication Training nour= O Simulator Training Hours D Non Requalitcation Training Hours O Number of Exam Failures 41 40-36 36 36 30-24 24 s' s' ,,o - i. is / 37 ~ 14 14 2 .i,. ?,. ,s, 10- [ e e e /.. e k [ 1 f 4 4 4 4 2 'j: t / 2 i,. I'*, i'I ~,~' ~ o-Cycle 91-4 Cycle 915 Cycle 910 Cycle 917 Cycle 921 Cycle 92 2 Cycle 92 3 LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING This indicator provides information on the total number of hours of training given to each crew during each cycle. The Simulator training hours shown on the graph are a subset of the total training hours. Non Requalification Training Hours are used for AOP/EOP verification & validation, INPO commitments, GET, Fire Brigade, Safety Meetings, and Division Manager lunches. Exam failures are defined as failures in the written, simulator, and Jo's Farformance Measures (JPMs) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalificatic, Trak g. The 2 exam failures in Cycle 92 3 were during a simulator evaluation. The individuals who failed the scenario were remediated and returned to shift by the eri of the requalliication week. Data Source: Gasper /Guliani (Manager / Source) Accountability: Gasper /Guliani Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 74

60 - O GRO Exams Admirustorod O sr o sixams Pastod G RO cxams Administotod O RO Exams Passed 30-20-9 ( e s.. ~- 10-j 4 k [ .) j a l h l l a-5 0- -l S E Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dm:: Jan Fob Mar Apr May Jun92 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Opera-tor (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally adminis-tored quizzes and exams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress. ( Due to the fransition of responsibilities for training performance indicators, data for the month of June was unavailable for this indicator. Normal reporting will resume with the July report. During the month of May 1992, there were 11 internally administered SRO exams taken and 6 of these exams were passed. The 5 who failed were given remedial training and all 5 passed the exams. There were no NRC administered SRO or RO exams during Cycle 92 3. Also during May, there were 15 internally administered RO exams given and 14 of these exams were passed. Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source) Accountability: Gasper /Guliani Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 75

O Hotlinos initiated ~ 5 Hotlines Closed @ Hotlines Overdue < 4 Weeks 30- @ Hotlines Overdue > 4 Weeks ~ 25-20-15-10-2 24 7 = 0 i i i i i i i i i i i i Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS This indicator shows the number of Hotline Training Memos that were initiated, returned for close out, overdue less than four weeks, and overdue greater than four weeks for the reporting month. Dua to the transition of responsibilities for training performance indicators, data for the month of June was unavailable for this indicator. Normal reporting will resume with the July report. _ May 1992 a Initiated Hotlines 10 Closed Hotlines 11 Hotlines Overdue < 4 wks. 5 Hotlines Overdue > 4 wks. 0 ) Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source) Accountabii! y: Gasper Adverse Trent None l g. l

O Other Training (1000 Hrs.) @ General Employee Tranning (1000 hrs.) O Technical Support (1000 Hrs.) O Chemistry and Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs.) O Maintenanco (1000 Hrs ) h 8 Operations (1000 Hrs.) p g_ E 3 _.2 5 m E g E m g o = w e a = ? 5 5 2 = ~ 5 = C C ,C ,~, ~,~,C ,C 0 C C i i Jun t Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May92 o TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS This indicator displays the training instruction hours administered to the listed depart-ments for the month of December 1991. Due to the transition of responsibilities for training performance indicators, data for the month of May was unavailable for this indicator. Normal reporting will resume with the July report. This indicator is normally one month behind the reporting month due to the time re-quired for data collection and processing. DEPARTMENT M ARCH '92 APRIL 92__ Operations 295 613 Maintenance 43 3 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 9 10 Technical Support 4 4 General Employee Training 168 106 Other 66 241 Total 585 977 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source) Accountability: Gasper Adverse Trend: None y

O Other Training (1000 Hrs.) @ General Employee Training (1000 hrr>.) O _ Techrucal support (1000 Hrs.) E Chemistry and Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs.) O Maintenance (1000 Hrs.) 25-G Operations (1000 Hrs.) 1 20- $ 1s-o 10-8

1 l

E E E g E' s-r a m = = a g = = i i i i i i i i i i i i Jun91 Jul _Aug _Sep Oct hhv Dec _Jan. Feb_ Mar Apr May92_ TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operationa, Maintenance,- Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training, and Other Training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station. Due to the transition of responsibilities for training performance indicators, data for the month of May was unavailable for this indicator. Normal reporting will resume with the July report. This indicator is normally one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed to collect and evaluate the data. DEPARTMENT M ARCH '92 APRll %2 Operations 2,295 4,918 Maintenance 150 200 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 7 - 10 _ Technical Support - 4 32 General Employee Training 944 439 Other 252 455 Total 3.652 6,054 Data Source: Gasper /Nev house (Manager / Source) Accountability: Gasper Adverse Trend: None 1

Violations por 1,000 Inspection Hours 9- --O-Fort Calhoun Goal e IGOODl l + .bs _ 5 ? E 3.7 yh- / 2 .: n 8 O O O O O --C O O 1-6 0-i i i i '88 '89 90 Jur:91 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May92 VIOLATIONS PER 1,000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per 1,000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data. The violations per 1,000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 3.28 for the twelve months from June 1,1991 through May 31,1992. This liicrease, which exceeds the Fort Calhoun goal,is due to the number of violations issued during this time period in comparison to the relatively low number of inspection hours for this same time period. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goa:is a maximum of 1.5 violations per 1,000 inspection hours. The goal was a maximum of 1.6 violations per 1,000 inspection hours for 1991. Data Source: Short/Eid (Manager / Source) Accountability: Short Advarse Trend: An adverse trend is indicated based on increasing values for three consecutive months. W

Fort Calhoun 3.28 Cooper 0.5 River Bend 2.42 Commancho Poak 1.33 Wolf Creek 3,04

Jkansas One 1.72 South Texas 2.04 Watoriord 3.49 0

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 - 4 Violations por 1,000_ inspection Hours COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV PLANTS This indicator provides a comparison of violations per 1,000 inspection hours among Region IV nuclear power plants. The data is compiled for a twelve month period from June 1,1991 through May 31,1992. The Fort Calhoun goal for 1992 is a maximum of 1.5 violations per 1,000 inspection hours. The goal for 1991 was a maximum of 1.6 violations per 1,000 inspection hours. Data Source: Short/Eid (Manager / Source)- Accountability: Short Adverse Trend: None m

25- -+- Number of Violations During the Last 12 Months -H>-- Number of NCVs During the Last 12 Months 20-16 15-14 f 13 / 10-8 f 7 7 7 h h 5 5-4 4 4 4 ~ N S 2 2 2 2 2 V V V 0 i i i i Jun91 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May92 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVE MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) The Cumulative Violations and Non C ted Violat:ons (NCVs) indicator shows the cumu-lative number of violations and the cuinulative number of NCVs for the last twelve months. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with col!ecting and processing the data for this indicator. Data Source: Short/Eid (Manager / Source) Accountability: Short Adverse Trend: An adverse trend is indicated based on three consecutive months of increasing values for the number of uumulative violations (twelve months running total). 81 l l

D TotalOutstanding CARS O Outstanding CARS > Six Monthe Old utstandng CARS hat Are MoMeaHon maw 200 - 150-m 100-i w i 4 a 4 8 i 4 n s 50 < g j J_ q g j ? ? 1 h p I 1 l l l E 4 c i t ,__;. e Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows tho total number of outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CARS), the number of outstanrjing CARS that are greater than clx months old, and the number of outstanding CARS that are modification related. At the end of June 1992, there were 83 outstanding CARS,31 CARS that were greater than six months old, and 2 CARS that were modification related. Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source) Accour,tability: Andrews/Gambhlr/ Gates Adverse Trend: None w j

20-O NOD Overdue CARS ~ O NOD CARS W Ah Extensions Granted 10-4 4 5-3 3 3 Op h OR 0 00 010kOR0101Ok Ju!91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 ~ O PED Overdue CARS ~ O PED CARS Wdh Extensions Granted 10-0 6 5 5 4 4 4 7 3 5-7 7 2 2 2 ',< 3 01 00 OR r '/ 0 $ O L./ f Op 0 / 0 2 r ? 0 'r Jut 91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mrir Apr May Jun92 20 -- O Other Overdue CARS O Other CARS With Extensions Granted 5-3 2 0 00 0 IU 00 0 00 00 00 00 00 0 I I I i i i 4 i I 4' i L Jul01 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 OVERDUE At1D EXTEtIDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the number of overdue CARS and the numbr r of CARS which received extensions broken down by organization. Overdue CARS 7verdue CARS April S2 May 92 June'92 ~ NOD O 0 0 PED 0 2 0 Others 0 1 0 Total 0 3 0 ' ' ' Extended CARS Extended CARS Apul 92 May 92 June'92 NOD 1 1 2 PED 3 5 6 Others 0 1 0 Total 4 7 8 Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source) Accountability: Andrews/Gambhir/ Gates Adverse Trend: An adverse trend is indicated based on increasing values for three cons 0cutive months for PED CARS with extensions granted. m ______________-.-_____----__-1

1991 sal.P Funct. Area CARS Si nit. CARS NRC Viola. LERs 0 A) Plant Operations 30 1 1 6 B) Radiolog. Controls 12 0 3 0 C) Maint/ Surveil 66 0 2 9 D) EmerDency 16 0 0 0 Preparedness E) Seounty 5 0 1 3 F) Ergr/ Tech Suppor1 93-3 1 12 G) Safety Assess < 27 1 1 2 Qual. Vent. H) Othei 0 0 0 0 Tota l 249 5 9 32 1992 SALP Funct Area CARS; Signif. CARS NRC Viola. -LERs A) Plant Operations 14 (5) 0 0 5(1) B) Radiolog. Controls 7 0 6 0 C) Maint/ Surveil, 87(5) 1 3 (1) 7 (2) D) Emergency 4 1 1 0 Preparedness E) Secunty 6 (5) 0 0 0 F) Engr / Tech Suppori 19 (6) 0 0 10 G) Safety Assess > 15 0 0 0 Oual. Vent. H) Othei 0 0 0 0 Tota 152(21) 2 10(1) 22 (3) Note: ( ) Indicate values for the reporting month. CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIFICANT CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs. LERs REPORTED The above matrix shows the number of Corrective Action Reports (CARS) issued by the Nuclear Services Division (NSD) vs. the number of Significant CARS issued by NSD vs. the number of violations issued by the NRC for the Fon Calhoun Station in 1991 and 1992. Included in this table is the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) identified by the Station each year. The number of NRC violations reported is one month behind the reponing month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the violations. Data Source:.. Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source) Short/Eid (Manager / Source) Accountability: Andrews/Gambhir/ Gates Adverse Trend: None SEP 15,20,21 g

400 _ + TotalOutago MWOs -+-- Parts Hold -O-MWOs Ready to Work -H-Engineering Hold -Y-Outage MWR Bac' dog 9 Planning Hold 300 - 200-100-O Y 2 0 Y Jun92 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep93 MWO PLAtil1111G STATUS (CYCLE 15 REFUELit1G OUTAGE) This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) that have been approved for inclusion in the Cycle 15 Refueling Outage and the number of MWOs that are ready to work (parts staged, planning complete, and all other paperwork ready for field use). Also included is the number of MWOs that have engineering holds (ECNs, procedures and other miscellaneous engineering holds), pans hold, (parts staged, not yet inspected, pans not yet arrived) and planning hold (job scope not yet completed). Maintenance Work Requests (MWRs) will also be shown that have been identified for the Cycle 15 Refueling Outage and have not yet been convened to MWOs. Approximately 2,176 Maintenance Work Orders were completed during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. Data Source: Patterson/Clemens (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Johansen Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 g

50- + TotalOutage Projects -O-Projects with Preliminary Schedules Submitted -->-- Projet:ts with Detailed Schedules Submitted 30-20-0 10-0 Jun92 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Aor May Jun Jul Aug Sep93 OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 15 REFUELING OUTAGE) This indicator shows the status of the 3. 'ojects which are in the scope of the Cycle 15 Refueling Outage. There are currently 14 cpproved outage projects. Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available. Data Source: Patterson/Olemens (Manager / Source) Accountability: Jaworski/Boughter Adverse Trend: None-SEP 31 h _2 -

40- TotalOutage Mod;fications O Mods with Final Design Approved Mods with Constructionlyckage Approved 30-0 20-10-0 Jun92 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep93 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 15 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING This indicator shows the status of modifications approved for completion during the Cycle 15 Refueling Outage. Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available. Data Source: Patterson/Clemens (Manager / Source) Accountability: Gambhir/Phelps/Faulhabst Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 I

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK OR-COMPONENT FAILURE ANALYSIS REPORT (CFAR) DERS

SUMMARY

This indicator tracks the total number of outsteding cor. The number of ttoms for Fort Calhoun Station with higher rective non-outage Maintenance Work Orders a ihe Fort f ailure rates than the rest of the industry for ari eighteen Calhoun Station versus their age in months. month time perod. Failures are reported as component (i.e. reciprocating pumps, motor operated valves, etc.) AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS and appleation (i e. charging pumps, teedwater pumps, This indicator is defined as the percentage of open, non-discharge pumps, etc.) categories, outage, maintenance work orders that are on hold awalt. Failure Cause Categories are: ing parts, to the total number of open, non-outage, main. Wear Out/ Aging a f ailure thought to be the conse-tenance work orders. quence of expected wear or aging. Manufacturing Defect a failure attributable to inad. AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM equate assembly or initial quality of the responsible com-PERFORMANCE ponent or system. The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) unavail. EngineerinyDesign a f ailure attributable to the inad-able hours and the estimated unavailable hours for the equate design of the responsible component or system. auxiliary feedwater system for the reporting period di-Other Devices a f ailure attributable to a failure or vided by the critical hours for the reporting period multi-misoperation of another component or system, including plied by the number of trains in the auxiliary foodwater associated devices. system. Maintenance / Testing a f allure that is a result of im-proper maintenance or testing, lack of maintenance, or AUXIUARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF personnel errors that occur during maintenance or test. HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS ing activities performed on the responsible component or - The cumulative hours that the Component Cooling Water. system, including f ailure to follow procedures, system is s utside the station chemistry limit. The hours Errors f ailures attributable to incorrect procedures that are accumt. lated from the first sample exceeding the limit were followed as written, improper installation of equip-until additional sampling shows the parameter to be back ment, and personnel errors (including f allure to follow within limits. procedures properly). Also included in this category are failures for which the cause is unknown or cannot be an-CARS ISSUED vs S!GNIFICANT CARS vs. NRC VIO-signed to any oi the preceding categories. LAT10NS vs. LERs REPORTED Provides a comparison of CARS issued, NRC violations, CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GPEATER and LERs reported. This indicator tracks performance for THAN 3 MONTHS OLD SEP #15,20, & 21. The percentage of totaloutstanding correc4ve mainte-nance items, not requiring an outage, that are greater CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE than three months old at the end of the pered reported. Compares the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate to the industry check valve f allure rate (f ailures per 1 million CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS & NON CITED VIOLA-component hours). The data for the industry f ailure rate TIONS (12 MON fH RUNNING TOTAL) is three months behind the PI Report reporting month. The cumulative number of violations and Non-Cited Vio-This indicator tracks performance for SEP #43. lations for the last 12 months. COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT Collective radiation exposure is the total external whole-This indicator shows the daily core thermal output as body dose received by all on site personnel (including measured from computer point XC105 (in thermal mega-contractors and visitors) dunng a time period, as mea-watts). The 1500 MW Tech Spec limit, and the unmet sured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) Col-portion of the 1495 MW FCS daily goal for the reporting lective radiation exposure is reported in units of man-month are also shown. rom. This indicator tracks radiological work performance for SEP #54. DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS) This indicator shows the number of f ailures occurring for COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG RuGION IV each emergency diesel generator during the last 25 start PLANTS demands and the last 25 load run demands. Provides data on violations per 1,000 inspection hours for Region IV nuclear power plants. DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY This indicator provides monthly data on the number of hours of dieselgenerator planned and unplanned un-availability. E l l

PERFORM At1CE INDICATOR DEFINITI0iJS (Cont'd) DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA A) A load-run of any duration that results from a real au-The percentage of the Radiation Controtted Area, which tomatic or manual hitiation. includes the auxiliary building, the radwaste buikhng, and B) A load-run test to satisfy the plant's load and duration areas of the C/RP building, that is decontaminated based as stated in each test's specifications. on the total square footage. This indicator tracks perior-C) Other special tetts in which the emergency generator mance for SEP # 54. is expected to be operated for at least one hour while loaded with at least 50% of its design load. DISABLING INJURY FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME

4) Number of Load : tun Failures: A load run failure ACCIDENT RATE) should be counted f >r any reason in which the emer.

This indicator is dehned as the number ci accidents for gency generator doos not pid up load and run as pre. all utikty personnel permanently assigned to the station, dicted. Failures are :ounted during any vahd load run involving days away from work per 200,000 man hours demands. worked (100 man years). This does not include contrac-

5) Esceptions: Unsu:cessf ul attempts to stad or load run tor personnel. This indicator tracks personnel perfor-should not be counts d as valid demands or failures when mance for SEP #25 & 26.

they can be attributef to any of the following: 1 A) Spurious trips thai would be bypassed in the event of DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL) an emergency. The Document Review Indicator shows the number of B) Malfunction of equipment that is not required during docuronts reviewed, the number of documents sched-an emergency. uled for review, and the number of document reviews C)Intentionalterminstion of a test because of abnormal that are overdue for the reporting month. A document conditions that would not have resutted in major diesel review is considered overdue if the review is not com* generator damage or repair. plate within 6 months of the assigned due date. This indi-D) Malfunctions or opirating errors which would have not cator trads pe;iormance for SEP a46. prevented the emergency generator from being restarted and brought to load w; thin a few minutes. EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM E) A f ailure to start because a portion of the starting sys-PERFORMANCE tem was disabled for tost purpose, if followed by a suc-The cum of the known (planned and unplanned) unavail-cessful start with the s1arting system in its normal abgn-able and the estimated unavailable hours for the emer-m ent. gency AC power system for the reporting period divided Each emergency gene stor failure that results in tne gen-by the number of hours in the reporting period multiplied erator being declared inoperable should be munted as by the number of trains in the amergency AC power sys-one demand and one failure. Exploratory tests during tem. correctNo maintenance and the successf ul test that 1ol-lows repair to verify operabihty should not be munted as EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABIL-demands or failures when the EDG has not been de. ITY elated operable again. This indicator shows the number of failures that were reported during the last 20,50, and 100 emergency die-ENGINEERING ASSIS"ANCE REQUEST (EAR) seigenerator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also BREAKDOWN shown are trigger values which correlate to a high level This indicator shows a b eakdown, by age of the EAR, of of confidence that a unit's dieselgenerators have ob-the number of EARS ass gned to Design Engineering tained a reliabihty of greater than or equal to 95% when Nuclear and System Eng ineering. This indicator tracks the demand f ailures are less than the trigger values. performance for SEP #63,

1) Number of Start Demands: All valid and inadvertent start demands, including all start only demands and all ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) BREAK.

start demands that are followed by load run demands, DOWN whether by automatic or manualinitiahon. A start-only This iridicator breaks down the number of Engineering demand is a damand in which the emergency generator Change Notices (ECNs)that are assigned to Design is started, but no atlempt is made to load the genera'or. Engineering Nuclear (DE N), Systi,m Engir,eering, and

2) Number of Start Failures: Any failure within the emer-Maintenance. The graphs provide data on ECN Facihty gency generator system that prevents the generator from Changes open ECN Subsntute Replacement Parts achieving specified frequency and voltage is classified as open, and ECN Documert Changes open. This indicator a valid stait failure. This includes any condition identified tracks periormance for St P #62.

in the course of maintenance Inspections (with the emer-gency generator in standay mode) that definitely would ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS have resulted in a start failure if a demand had occurred. The number of ECNs that were opened, ECNS that were

3) Number of Load Run Demands: For a valid load run completed, and open bacuog ECNs awaiting completion demand to be counted the load-run attempt must meet by DEN for the reporting rienth. This indicator tracks per-one or more of the following criteria:

formance for SEP 862. \\ _ _____ a

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd) EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1,000 CR!TI. GROSS HE AT RATE CAL HOURS Grost, heat rate is defined as the ratio of total thermal Equipment forced outages per 1000 crnical hours is the energy an Brnish Thermal Umts (BTU) produced by the inverse of the mean time between forced outages reactor to the total gross electrical energy produced by caused by equipment failures. The mean time is equal to the generator in kilowatt hours (KWH). the number of hours the reactor is criticalin a period (1000 hours) divided by the number of forced cutages HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED caused by equipment f ailures in that period. The total amount (in Kilograms) of non halogenated haz-ardous waste, halogenated hazardWl waste, and other EOUlVALENT AVAILABluTY FACTOR hazardous waste produced by FUS each month. lhis indicator is defined as the raSo of gross available generation to gross maximem generation, expressed as HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM a percentage. Available Doneraton is the energy that can SAFCTY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE be produced if the unit is operated at the maximum The sum of the known (planned and unplanneo) unavail-power level permitted oy equipment and regulatory limi. _ able hours and the estimated unavailable hours for the lations. Maximum generation is the energy that can be high pressure safety injection system for the reporting produced by a unit in a given period if operated continu. period divided by the critical hours for the reporting pe-ously at maximum capacity, riod multip!ind by the number of trains in the high pres. sure safety injection system. EXPEDITED PURCHASES The percentage of expedited purchases occurring during HOTUNE TRAINING MEMOS the reporting month compared to the total number of pur-. The number of Hottmo Training Memos (HTM) that are chase orders generated, inillated, closed, and overdue less or greater than 4 weeks for the indicated month. A HTM is a training docu-FORCED 08JTAGE RATE-ment sent out for immediate review. The HTM should be This indicator is defined as the oercentage of time that reviewed and signed within 5 days of receipt of the HTM. the unit was unavailable due to forced events Compared to the time planned for electrical generation. Forced IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT OF SER-events are failures or ot er unplanned conditions that Y;CE h require removing the unit from service before the end of Total number of in4ne chemistry instruments that are the next weekend. Forced events include start up f ail-out of service in the Secondary System and the Post ures and events initiated while the unit is in reserve shut-Accident Sampling System (PASS). down (i.e., the unit is available but not in service). INVENTORY ACCURACY FUEL REUABluTY INDICATOR The percentage of line items that are counted eacn This indcator is defined as the steady state primary cool-month by the warehouse which need count adjustments, ant 1-131 activtry, cortected for the tramp uranium contri-bution and rormalired to a common puttheation rate. INVOICE BREAKDOWN Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposited on re. The number of invoices that are on hold due to sheff lif e, actor core internals from previous defective f uel or is COE, and miscellaneous reasons. present on the suriace of fuel elements from the manu-facturing process. Steady state is defined as continuous LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS operation for at least three days at a power level that This Indicator shows the number of SRO and/or RO quiz-does not vary more than + or 5%. Plants should collect zes and exams that are administered and passed each data for this indicator at a power level above 85%, when month. This indicator tracks training performance for possible. Plants that did not operate at steady state SEP 868. power above 85% should collect data for this indicator at the highest steady state power level attained during the LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAIN. month. ING The density correction f actor is the ratio of the specific The total number of hours of training given to sach crew volume of coolant at the RCS operating temperature during each cycle. Also provided are the simulator train-(540 degrees F, Vf = 0.02146) divided by the specific ing hours (which are a subset of the totaltraining hours), volume of coolant at normalletdown temperature (120 the number of non requalification training hours and the . degrees F at outlet of the letdown cooling heat ex-number of exam f ailures. This indicator tracks traini"0 - changer. VI - 0.016204), which results in a density cor-performance for SEP #68, raction f actor ior FCS equal to 1.32. GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DIS. CHARGED TO1HE ENVIRONMENT - This indicator displays the total number of Curies of all gaseous radioactive nuchdes released from FCS. 90

PERFORMAtJCE ltJDICATOR DEFil4lTIOtJS (Cont'd) LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN BREAKDOWN This ndicator is a breakdown of corrective non outage This indicator shows the number and root cause code for maintermco work orders by severaicategones that re-Licensee Event Reporte. The root cause codes are as main open at the end of the reporting month. This indica-folk >ws: tor tracks maintenance performance for SEP #36.

1) Administrative Control Problem Managemeat and supervit%ry dehciencies that affect plant programs or MAINTENANCE OVERTIME activsbos (i e., poor otanning, breAdown or lack of ad-The % of overtime hours compared to normal hours for equate management or supervisory control, incorrect maintenance. 'Diis includes OPPD personnel as well as procedures, etc.)

contract personnel.

2) Licensed Operator Error This cause code captures errors of omission' commission by 1. censed reactor opera-MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING tors dunng plant activities.

The percent of material requests (MRS) for issues with

3) Othor Personnel Error Errors of omission'commis-their request date the same as their need date compared son commined by non-licensed personnelinvolved in to the total number of MRs.

i plant activities.

4) Maintenance Problem The in'ont of this cause MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE code is to capture the full range of problems which can The total maximum amount of radiation received by an be attnbuted in any way to programmahc dehciencies in individual person working at FCS on a monthly, quarterly, the maintenance functonal organlzation. Activrties in-and annual basis, cluded in this ategory are maintenance, testing, surveil.

lance, calibration and radiation protecton. MWO PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 15 REFUELING

5) Design'Constructon' installation /Fabricaton Problem CUTAGE)

This cause code covers a full range of programmatic The total number of Maintenance Work Orders that have deficiencies in the areas of design, constructon,installa-been approved for inclusion in the Cycle 1$ Refueling 16on, and labncation (i.e., loss of control power due to Outage and the number that are ready to work (parts unJerrated fuse, equipment not qualified for the environ-staged, planning complete, and allother paperwork ment, sic.). ready for field use). Also included is the number of

6) Equipment Failures (Electronic Pieco Parts or Envi-MWOs that have engineering holds (ECNs, procedures ronmental.Related Failures) This coce is used for spuri-and other misestlaneous engineering holds), parts hold, ous failures of electronic piece-parts and fadures due to (parts staged, not yet inspected, parts not yet arrived) meteorological conditions such as lightning, ice, high and planning hold (Job scope not yet completed). Main-winds, etc. Generally, it includes spurious or one time tenance Work Requests (MWRs) are also shown that f ailures. Electric components included in this category have been identified for the Cycle 15 Refueling Outage are circuit cards, rectifiers, bistables, fuses, capacitors, and have not yet been converted to MWOs.

dodes, resistors, etc. NUMDER OF HOT SPOTS LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE DEING DISCHARGED The number of rachological hot spots which have been TO THE ENVIRONMENT identified and documented to exist at FCS at the end of This indicator displays the total number of curies from all the reporting month. A hot spot is a smalllocataed liquid releases from FCS to the Missouri Rrver, source of radiation. A hot spot occurs wher$ the contact dose rate of an item is at least 5 times the General Area LOGG ABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) c'ose rate and the item's dose rate is equal to or greater The tots.1 number of secunty incidents for the reporting than 100 rnRem/ hour. mcath depicted in two graphs. This indicator tracks secu-rity performance for SEP #58. NUMBER OF HPRDS MULTIPLE FAILURES The number of NPRDS reportable f ailures over the pre-MAINTENANCd EFFECTIVENESS coding eighteen months sorted by component manuf ac-The number of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System turer and model number. (NPRDS) components with more than 1 failure and the number of NPRDS components with more than 2 failuras NUMDER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM for the last eighteen months. INSTRUMENTS A control room instrument that cannot perform its design MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER D ACKLOG function is considered as out-of service. A control room The number of corrective non-outage maintenance work instrument which has had a Maintenance Work Order orders that remain open at the end of the reporting (MWO) wrinen for it and has not been repaired by the month. This indicator was added to the Pi Report to end of the reporting period 15 considered r ut of service trend open corrective non outage maintenance work or-and willbe counted. The duraton of the out of service dets as stated in SEP #36, conditon is not considered. Computer CRTs are not con-sidered as control room instruments. 91

l PERFORM ANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd) NUMDER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS AEPORTED IN OVERAl L PROJECT STATUS LERS This indicator shows the status of the projects which are The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) attributed in the scope of the Cycle 15 Refueling Outape, to personnel error on t! e original LER submittal. This indcator trends personnel performanw for SEP 815. OVERDUE AllD EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS NUMBER OF MISRD SURVEILLANCE TESTS RE. The number of overdue Corrective Acton Repo ts SULT1NG IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS (CAR $) and the number of CARS which received exten-The number of Surveillance Tests (STs) that resutt in sions broken down by organization for the last 6 months. Licensee Event Reports (LERs) outing the reporting month. This indicator tracks missed STs for SEP #00 & PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTE-C1. HANCE ACTIVITIES The % of the number of completed maintenance activi-OPERAT10NS AND MAlHTENANCE BUDGET ties as compared to the number of scheduled mainte-The year to date budget compared to the actual expen-nance activities each week. This % is shown for each d tures for Operatons and Maintenanco departments. maintonarice craft. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and other miscella. OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS neous activrties. These indcators track Maintenance per-This indicator displays the total nu nber of outstanding formance for SEP W33. Correctrve Action Reports (CARS), the number of CARS that are older than six months and the number of modifi. PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE caton related CARS. The rato of the number of turnovers to average employ. ment. A turnover is a vacancy created by voluntary resig-OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS nation from the company. Retirement, death, terminaton, The numbor of Modifcation Repests (MRn)in any stato transf ers within the company, and part time employees between the issuance of a Moerficaton Number and the are not considered in turnover. completion of the drawing update.

1) Form FC 1133 Backlog'In Progress. Thi., number rep.

PLANNED CAPADILITY LOSS FACTOR resents modifcation requests that have nst been plant The ratio of the plannsd energy lossst dunng a given a;. proved during the reporting month, period of time, to the reference enargy generation (the

2) Modificaton Requests Being Reviewed. This category energy that could be produced if the unit ware operated includes; continuously at full power under reference ambient con-A.) Modifcation Requests that are not yet reviewed, ditions), expressed as a percentage.

B.) Modifcation Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear Projects Review Committee (NPRC) PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE C.) Modifcation Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear This indicator is defined as the % of preventive mainte. Projects Committee (NPC) nance items in the month that were not completed by the These Modifcation Requests may be reviewed several scheduled date plus a grace period equal to 25 % of the times before they are approved for accomphshment or scheduled interval. This indcator tracks preventive main-cancelled. Some of these Modification Requests are to. tenance activities for SEP #41, turned to Engineering for more information, some ap. proved for evaluation, some approved for study, and PROGRESS Or CYCLE 15 OUTAGE MODIFICATION some approved for planning. Once planning is completed PLANNING and the scope of the work is clearly defined, these Modi. This indicator shows tne status of modif cations ap-fication Requests may be approved for accomnhshment proved for completion during the Cycle 1S Ref uehng Out-with a year assigned for construction or they may be can-age. celled. Allof these different phases requits review.

3) Design Engineering Backlogin Progress. Nuclear PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY % OF HOURS OUT Planning has assigned a year in which construction will OF LIMIT be completed and design work may be in progress.

The % of hours out of limit are for six primary chemistry

4) Construction Backlog 1n Progress. The Construction parameters d4vided by the total number of hours possible Package has been issued or construction has begun but for the month. The key parameters used are: Lithium, the modification has not been accepted by the Systern Chloride. Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluoride, and Acceptance Committee (SAC).

Suspended Sohds. EPRIlimits are used.

5) Design Engineering Update Backlog 1n Progress. PED has received the Modifcation Completion Report but the drawings have not been updated.

The above mentioned outstanding modifcatons do not include modifcatons which are proposed for cancella-tion. 92

PERFORMAt4CE ltJDICATOR DEFithTIONS (Cont'd) PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE) The number of identified incidents concerning mainte-includet incidents that were caused by inerstreet access nance proced.stal problems, the number of closed irs authorization information entered ho'he security sys-related to the use of procedures (includes the number of tem computer. closed irs caused by procedural 1oncompliance), and

3) Security Force Error Events caused by members of the number of Closed procedural noncompliance irs.

the security force that are found to be inattentive to their This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP duties of who negleded to property periorm assigned

1$,41 & 44.

functions (e.g., required search procedure of patrot).

4) Unsecured Doors Doors which are found to be unse.

RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM cured with no compensatory offcer posted or where the The number of identified poor radiological work practces individua, cauting the alarm did not remain at the (PRWP) for the reporting month. This indicator tracks alarmed door until a security officer responded. Events radiological work periormance for SEP 852, where an unsecured door is ccused by nk tuetture are included in this category unless there is an indcation that RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE an adjustment was made to the door. The f ato of preventive maintenance (including surveil-This indicator tracks secunty periormance for SEP #50. lance testing and calibtJion procedures) to the sum of non outage corrective maintenance and preventive main. SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES tenance completed over the reporting period. The rato, The following components are the types of loggable/re-expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on man-portable SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES represented in hours. This indicator tracks preventive maintenance ac-this indcator, incidents in this categorg hclude alarm tivities for SEP #41. system f allures, CCTV f ailures, security computer f all-utes, search equipment iallures, and door hardware f ail-RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FRE-ures. These system f ailures are furaer categorized as QUENCY RATE follows: The number of injuries requiring more than normal first

1) Atarm System Failure Detection system wents in-aid per 200,000 man-hours worked. This indicator trends volving f alse/ nuisance alarms and mechanical f ailures, pe.&onnel periormance for SEP 815,25 & 26.

2) Alarm System Environs Degradations to detection system performance as a result of environmental condi-SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTTlY PERFORMANCE tions (i.e., rain, snow, f rost).

INDEX

3) CCTV Failures Mechanical 1ailures to all CCTV hard.

The Chemistry Periormance Inder (CPI)is a calculation ware components. based on the conenntraton of key impurities in the sec.

4) CCTV Environs Degradations to CCTV periormance ondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the as a result of environmental conditions (i s., rain, snow, most likely cause of deterioraton of the steam genera-frost, fog, sunspots, shade),

lors. The chemistry parameters are reported only for the

5) Security Computer Failures Failure of the multi-period of time greater than 30 percent power.

plexer, ceritral processing unit, and other computer hard. The SPIis calculated using the following equaton: cpl. ware and software. This category does not include soft. (KCO.8) + (Na20) + (0,/10)) / 3 where the following are ware problems caused by operator error in using the monthly averages of: Ka. average blowdown cation software. conductivity, Na = average blowdown sodium concen-

6) Search Equipment Failures Failures of x ray, metal, tration, O, - average condensate pump discharge dis-or explosive detectors and other equipment used to solved oxygen concentraton.

search for contraband. This also includes incidents where the search equipment is found to be defective of SECURITY NON< SYSTEM FAILURES did not function properly during testing. The following components are the types of loggable/re.

7) Door Hardware Failures Failure of the door alarm portable non-system f ailures represented in this indica-and other door hardware such as latches, electric strikes, tor, incidents in this category include security had2*%

doorknobs, locks, etc. access control and authorization, security force error,

8) 1991 versus 1992 System Failures Statistics from and unsecured doors.

199 will be compared on a monthly basis with 1992

1) Security Dadges incidents associated with improper loggat"e/ reportable system failures.

use and handling of security badges. Incidents include This indicator tracks security performance for SEP #58. Security badges that are lost, taken out of the protected area, out of control on site, or inadvertently destroyed or SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE broken. The dollar value of the spare parts inventory for FCS dur-

2) Access Control and Authorization Administrative and ing the reporting period.

procedural errors associated with the use of the card, access system such as tailgating, incorrect secunty SPARE PARTS ISSUED badge issued, and improper escort procedures. This also The dollar value of the spare parts issued for FCS during the reporting pered. 93

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd) STAFFING LEVEL TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS The actual staffing level and the aJthorized staffing level The total nurrber and de,wrtment breakdown of training for the Nuclear Operatons Divison, the Producton Engi-instructon hours administered by the Training Center. neering Division, and the Nuclear Services Division. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #24. TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS Reportable skin and clothing contaminations above STATION NET GENERATION background lovs!s greater than 5000 #pm/100 cm The not generaton (sum) produced by the FCS durin0 squared. This indcator trr,nds personnel parformance for the reporting month. SEP #15 & 54. STOCKOUT RATE UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR The total number of Pck Tickets that were generated The ratio of the available energy generation over a given during the terutting month and the total number of Pck time period to the reference energy generation (the en-Tckets that were generated during the reporting month ergy that could be produced if the unit were operated when the amount of parts requested is equal to of lesS continuously at full power undar reference ambient con-than the minimum stocking level and parts are not avail-d;tions) nyer the same time period, expressed as a per-able. contage. TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS The number of temporary mechanical and electreal con-WHILE CRITICAL figurations to the plant's systems. This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned au-

1) Temporary configuratons are dehned as electrical tomate sciarns (reactor protection system logic actua-jumpers, electreal blocks, mechanical jumpers, or me-tions) that occur per 7,000 hours of critcal operation, chanical blocks which are installed in the plant operatin9 The value for this indicator is calculated by multiplying systems and are not shown on the latest revision of the the total number of unplanned automatic reactor scrams PalD, schema 6c, mnnection, wiring, or flow diagrams.

in a spoedic time period by 7,000 hours, then dividing

2) Jumpers and blocks which are installed for Surveil-that riumber by the total r$ umber of hours critical in the lance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, Calibraton Pro-same time perod. The indcator is fether defined as cedures, Special Procedures, or Operating Proc Wures follows:

are rot considered as temporary modifcations unless the 1) Unplanned means that the scram was not an antici-jumper or block remains in place after the test or proce-pated part of a planned test. c dure is complete. Jumpers and blocks installed in test or

2) Scram means the aut3matic shutdown of the reactor lab instruments are not considered as temporary modifi-by a rapid insertion of negative reactivity (e g., by contral cationc.

rods, hquid injoction system, etc.) that is caused by ac-

3) Scatiolding is not considered a temporary modifica-tuation of the reactor protection system. The scram sig-tion. Jumpers and blocks which are installed and fof nalmay have resulted from exceeding a setpoint or may which MRs have been submitted will be considered as have been spurious.

temporary modifications untilfinal resolution of the MR

3) Automatic means that the initial signal that caused ed the jumper or block is removed or is permanently actuaton of the reactor protectbn system logic was pro-recorded on the drawings. This inder ator tracks tempo-vided from one cf the sensors monitoring plant param-rary modifications for SEP 462 & 71.

eters and conditions, rathe than the manual scram switches or, in manual turbine trip switches (or push but-THE3 MAL PERFORMANCE tons) provided in the main control room. The ratio of the design gross heat rate (mrrected) to the

4) Critical means that during the cteady. state condition of adjusted actual gross heat rate, expressed as a percent-the reactor pror to the scram, the effective multiphcation

age, f actor (k,,) was essentially equal to one.

TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING UNPLANNED CAPABluTY LOSS FACTOR The total number of ctudent hours of training for Opera-The ratio of the unplanned energy losses during a given tions, Maintenance, Chemistry / Radiation Protection, period of time, to the reference energy generation (the Technical Support, General Employee Training, and energy that could be produced if the unit were operated Other Training conducted for FCS. continuously at full power under reterence ambient con-ditions) over the same time period, expressed as a per-coniage. t S% -b

PERFORMAt4CE It4DICATOR DEFit41TIOt4S (Cont'd) UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS. (INPO DEFINITION) This indcator is defined as the sum of the following saft *y system actuations:

1) The umber of unplanned Emergency Core Cooling Sys',m (ECCS) actuations that result from reaching an EC.;S actuaton setpoint or from a spurousinadvertent EC";S signal.

2)'i5e number of unplanned emergency AC power sys-tem 'ctuations that result from a loss of power to a safe-gua'.-s bus. An unptanned safety system actuaton oc-cbts when an actuaton setpoint for a safety system is reached or when a spurous or inadvertent signal is gen-etated (ECCS only), and major equipment in the system is actuated. Unplanned means that the system actuaton was not part of a p!anned test or evoluton. The ECCS actuatons to be counted are actuations of the high pres-suro injection systoni, tne low pressure injection system, or the safety injection tanks. UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUAT10NS(NRC DEFINITION) The number of safety syst em actuations which include (2ng) the H@h Pressure Safety injection System, the Low Pressure Safety injection System, the Safety injec-ton Tanks. and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classifcation of safety system actuations includes actuatons when major equipment is operated and when the logic systems for the above safety systems are chat-lenged. VIOLATIONS PER 1,000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator is defined as the number of violations sited in NRC inspecton reports for FCS per 1,000 NRC in-spection hours. The violatons are reported in the year that the inspection was actually performed and r ot based on when the inspection report is received. The hours re-ported for each inspection report are used as the inspec-tion hours. VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE This indicator is defined as the volume of low level solid radioactive waste actually shipped for burial. This indica-tot also shows the volume of low level radioactive waste which is in terrporary storage, the amount of radioactive oil that han been shipped off site for processing, and the volume of tolgi dry radbactive waste which has been shipped off-site for processing. Low-level solid radioac-tive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance. Dry radioactive waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning materials, disposable protactive clothing, plastic centainers, and any other material to be disposed of at a low level radio-ac'AWsie dismal site, except resin, sludge, or t ;% 4r bottorn. t#w-level ref ers to all radioactive g =.i; 'it not spent fuelor a by product of spent fuel i > q). This indicator tracks radiological work perfor-j v atSEPa54.

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX 'The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators Index is to list perior. mance indicators related to SEP ttems with parameters that can be trended. SEP Ref erence Number 15 Eag2 increase HOES and IR Accountabildy Through Use of Periormance Indicators Procedaral Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance). .33 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations. .. 51 Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate...... .. 70 Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs................... . 71 CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported.. .,84 SEP Reference Number 20 Ouality Audits and Surveillance Programs are Evaluated, improved in Depth and Strengthened CARS.ssued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported.. .. 84 SEP Referet s Number 21 Develop and Conduct Safety System FunctionalInspections CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported. . 84 SEP Reference Number 24 Complete Staff Studies Staffing Level . 73 SEP Reference Number 25 Training Program for Managers and Supervisors implemented Disabling injury /lliness Frequency Rate.. . 18 Recordable injury /lliness Cases Frequency Rate. .......70 SEP Reference Number 26 Evaluate and implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements Disabling injury / Illness Frequency Rate.. .18 Recordable tnjury/lliness Cases Frequency Rate.... ... 70 SEP Reference Number 31 Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWO Planning Status... .85 Overall Project Status.... .86 Progress of Cycle 15 Outage Modification Planning. . 87 SEP Reference Numbet 33 Develop On Line Maintenance and Modification Schedule Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activiiles (Electrical Maintenance).... . 35 (Pressure Equipment).... . 36 (General Maintenance). .... 37 (Mechanical Maintenance).. . 38 (Instrumentation & Control).. .39 SEP Reference Number 36 Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Breakdown (Corrective Non Outage Maintenance)... . 27 Corrective Maintenance Backlog Greater than 3 Months Old (Non Outage).. . 28 Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Conective Non-Outage Maintenance).. . 34 SEP Reference Number 41 Develop and Implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule 96 f 4

SEP Reference Number 41 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance. .. 29 Preventive Maintenance items Overdue. .30 Procedural Noncompliance incidents. . 33 SEP Reference Number 43 Implement the Cuk Valve Test Program Check Valve Failure Rate.. . 44 SEP Reference Number 44 Compliance With and Use of Procedures Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance).. ... 33 SEP Reference Numbed Design e procedures Control and Administrative Program Document Hoview.. . 22 SEP Reference Number 52 Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices Radiological Work Practices Program..... . 53 SEP Reference Number 54 Complete implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program Collective Radiation Exposure (Cumulative). .16 Volume of Low-Level Sotio Radioactive Waste. ...........17 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations... . 51 Decontaminated Radiation Controlled Area.................,,. . 52 SEP Reference Number 58 Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Program Loggable/ Reportable inciderv.s (Security).................. .... 57 Securtty Non-System Failures...........................................,........... ............. 5 8 Security System Fallures........................ .............59 SEP Reference Number 60 improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports.... .. 40 SEP Reference Number 61 Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports.. .... 40 SEP Reference Number 62 Establish interim System Engineers Temporary Modifications................. ..... 66 Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown.... .... 67 Engineering Change Notice Stalus....... . 08 Engineering Change Notice Breakdown......... . 69 SEP Reference Number Ee Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and Establish Means to Monitor Operator Training Licensed Operatof Requalification Training.................,..... . 74 Lice nse Candidate Ex ams.................................................. ........75 SEP Reference Numbar 71 Improve Controls over Temporary Modif4ations Temporary Modifications...... ...,,66 97

REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST R. L. Andrews E. R. Gundal T. L. Patterson G. L. Anglehart R. H. Guy R. T Pearce W. R. Bateman R. M. Hawkins R. L Phelps K. L. Belek M. C. Hendrickson W.J. Ponce A. D. Bilau R. R. Henning L. M. Pulverenti B. H. Biome K. R. Henry T. M. Reisdorff C. N. Bloyd J. B. Herman A. W. Richard J.P.Bobba G. J. Hill D. G. Ried C. E. Boughter K. C. Holthaus G. K. Samide M. A. Breuer L. G. Huliska T.J.Sandene C. J. Brunnert C.J. Husk B. A. Schmidt M. W. Butt R. L Jaworski S. T. Schmitz C. A. Carlson R.A.Johansen F. C. Scofield J. W. Chase W. C. Jones L. G. Sealock G. R. Chatfield J.D.Kecy H. J. Selick A. G. CMstensen J. D. Keppler J. W. Shannon A. J. Clark D. D. Kloock R. W. Short O. J. Clayton J. C. Knight C. F. Simmons R. P. Clemens D. M. Kobunski E.L.Skaggs J. L. Connolley G J. Krause J. L. Skiles G. M. Cook L J. Kripal F. K. Srrith M. R. Core J. G. Krist R. L. Sorenson S. R. Crttes J. B. Kuhr J. A. Spilker D. W. Date L T. Kusek K. E. Steele R. C. DeMeulmeester L.E. Labs W. Steele R. D. DeYoung M. P. Lazar H. F. Sterta D. C. Dietz R. C. Learch G. A. Teeple K.S. Dowdy R. E. Lewis M. A. Tesar J. A. Drahota R. C. Liebentritt T. G.15erkildsen T. R. Dukarski B. Lisowyj J.W.'il:Is D.L.Eid B. R. Livingston D. R. Trausch R. G. Euric' J. H. MacKinnon P. R. Turner H. J. Faulhauvr G. D. Mamoran J. M. Uhland M. A. Ferdig J. W. Marcil C. F. Vanecek F. F. Franco N. L Marfice J. M. Waszak M. T. Frans D. J. Matthews G. R. Williams H. K. Fraser J. M. Mattice S. J. Willrett J. F. W. Friedrichsen T. J. Mcivor W. C. Woerner S. K. Gambhir K. S. McCormick J. K. Gasper R. F. Mehalley W. G. Gates K. G. Melstad M. O. Gautier K. J. Morris S. W. Gebers D. C. Mueller J. M. Glantz R. J. Mueller J. T. Gleason J. B. Newhouse L. V. Goldberg M. W. Nichols D. J. Golden C. W. Norris D. C. Gorence Nuclear Licensing R. E. Gray & Industry Affairs M. J. Guinn J. T. O'Connor G. E. Guliani W. W. Orr K. B. Gutiani L L. Parent 90

POSITIVE TREND REPORT ADVERSE TREND REPORT (Continued) The Positive Trond Report highlights several Perfor-Cumu!stive hJa4cns and NCVs (Twe!ve Month Runn!nc mance indcArs with data representing continued per. Ipign formance above the stated goal and indcators with data (Page 81) representing significant improvement in recent months. The number of cumulative violations (twe?ve month run-The following indicators have been selected as exhibiting positive trends: Ryerdue and Extent ed Corrective Action neoorts (Page 83) The number of extended CARS for PED has increased Security System Failures for thise consecutive months. (Page 5;) The number of system failures per month during 1992 has consistently been less than the number of system End of Adverse Trend Report. f ailures for the corresponding months of 1991, Qfigiandina Mod fications (Page 65) INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED The number of outstanding modifications has decreased from a total of 286 in Jutv 1991 to a total of 176 in June MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT 1992. This sectson lists the indcators winch show inadequacies as compared to the OPPD goal and indicators which End of Positive Trend Report show inadequacies as compared to the industry upper ten percentils. The indicators will be compared to the industry upper ten percentde at relevant to that indicator. ADVERSE TREND REPORT Unolanned Automatic Reactor S~ams ner 7.000 Hours A Performance Indcator which has data representing Critical three (3) consecutive months of derJining performance (Page 3) constrtutes an adverse trend. The Adverse Trend Report The number of unplanned automatic reactor scrams per explains the conditons under which certain indicators are 7,000 hours critical year to date value for the reporting showing adverse trends. An explanation will be provided month (3.23) exceeds the Fort Calhoun 1992 goal of for indicators with data representing three months of de-zero (0). clining performance that have been labeled as adverse trends. Disabbna loiurv/itiness Frecuenev Rate flest Time Acci. The following indicators are exhibiting adverse trends for dent Rate) the reporting month: ag the reporting month (0.64) exceeds the Fort Calhoun Aas of Outstandino Maintenance Work Orders (Corree-goalof 01 ment ForeM Odam N t000 Na! h p 26 fhe e9u ment forced outage rate per 1,000 critical The number of outstanding MWOs 6 9 months old and 9 - 12 months old has increased for three consecutive months. This trend is due to the Cycle 14 Refueling Out-hours at the end of the re,norting month (0.92) exceeds age durag February, March and April. the Fort Calhoun goal of OA In-Line Chemistrv Instruments Out of Service Ratro of Preventive to Total Maintenance (Non-Outace) (Page 48) (Page 29) The ratio of preventive to total maintenance for the re-The number of in-line chemistry instru nts has in- 'it porting month (53.4%)is lower than the Fort Calhoun creased for three consecutive mon + !,as exceeded the Fort Calhoun goal each month from Lecember 1991 goa M 6 m through June 1992. PrevenCve Maintenance l' ems Overdue Viola 4cns Per 1.000 inseeetion Hours (Page 30) g,79) The percentage of preventive maintenance items over. The number of NRC violations per 1,000 inspection due for the reporting month (1.0%) exceeds the Fort Cal, hours for Fort Calhoun Station has increased for three n goalof 0% consacutive months and exceeds the goal. I

INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT lMPROVEMENTS/ CHANGES (Continued) (Continued) Second*'y Gvitem Chemitt'v Overdue and Extended Corre:tve Actbn neoorts (Page 45) (Page 83) The secondary system chemistry periormance inder The graph for this indicator has been changed from a value for the month of June 1992 (0.554)is above the line to a column form to comply with the report's standard Fort Oathoun goal of 0.45. for monthly data. Iptal Skin and Cbthina ContaminfWons MWO Planninu Status (Cvete is Refuelina Outsag} (Page 51) (Page 85) The cumulative skin and clothing contaminations at the This indicator has been added to the report. end of the reporting month (224) exceeds the Fort Cal. houn goal of 144. Overall Proied Ststus (Cvelo 15 Refuel!na Outace) (Page 86) Decontaminated ;.adiaton Control!ed A'en This indacator has been added to the report. (Page 52) The percentage of the RCA that is decontaminated for Procrets of Ovele 15 Outaae Mod 6eaton Plann!na the reporting month **7%) is less than the Fert Calhoun (Page 87) goalof 68%. This indicator has been added to the report. Inventon, A curaev (Page 02) End of Indcator improvement / Changes Report. The inventory accuracy for the reporting month (94%) is less than the Fort Calhoun goal of 98%. Rewrdable Iniufvtitiness Cates Frecuenev Egig (Page 70) The recordable injury / illness cases frequency rate for the reporting month (2.23) is above the Fort Calhoun goal of 2.0. End of Management Attention Report. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES This section lists signifcant changes made to the report and to specif c indcators within the report since the pre. vious month. Uno!anned Automatic Rondor Scrams Per 7.000 Hours Crttical (Page 3) A graph has been added to provide a year in-dr.tv ard a 36 month time period value for this indicato*. This change was initiated to provi(e a comparison betweer. Fort Calhoun Station's performance and the 1992 geal and INPO's approximate industry upper ten arcentlie value (which is based on a 36 monthine p, xf). Fuel Reliabmtv Indicator (Page 15) The graph for this indicator has beeri charged from a line to a column form to comply with the report's standard for monthly data.

OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES Event Date Rany Producti:n (MWH) Cumulative (MWH) Cycle 1 09/26/73 02/01/75 3,299,639 3,299,639 1st Refueling 02/01/75 05/09f75 Cycle 2 05/09/75 10/01/76 3,733,322 7,152,961 2nd Refueling 10/01/76 12/13/76 Cycle 3 12/13/76 9/30/77 2,805,927 9,958,888 3rd Refueling 09/30777 12/09/77 Cycle 4 12/09/77 10/14/78 3,026,D? 12,985,720 4th Refueling 10/14/78 12/24/78 Cycle 5 12/24/78 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 5th Refueling 01/18180 06/11/80 Cycle 6 06/11/F'). 09/18!81 3,899,714 20,768,168 6th Refueling 09/10/81 11,21/81 Cycle 7 12/21/81412/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 7th Refueling 12/06/82 04/07/83 Cycle 8 04/07/83 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 8th Refueling 03/03/84 07/12/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 09/2[e'5 4,741,488 32,477,893 9th Refueling 09/28/85 01/16/86 Cycle 10 01/16/86 03!O7/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 10th Refueling 03/07/87 06/08/87 5 Cycle 11 06/08/87 09/27/08 4,936,859 41,771,505 11th Refueling 09/27/88 01/31/t.9 Cycle 12 0t/31/89 02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 12th Retuoling 02/17/90 05/29/90 Cycle 13 05/29/90 02/01/92 5,451,069 51,040,528 13th Retuoling 02/01/92 05/03/92 Cycle 14# 05/03/92 09/18/93 (Planned Dates) 14th Refueling 09/18/93 11/13/93 Cycle 15 11/13/93 03/11/95 15th Retu 11ng 03/11/95 05/06/95 FCRT CALHOUN STATION CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS " RECORDS" First Sustained Reaction August 5,1$73 (5:47 p.m.) First Electricity Supplied to the System August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH) September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%) May 4,1974 Longest Run (477 days) June 8,1987-Sept. 27,1988 Highest Monthly Not Generation (364,468,800 KWH) October 1987 Most Productive Fuel Cycle (5,451,069 MWH)(Cycle 13) May 29,1990-Fab.1,1992 l __}}

ML20099B495

Text

SUMMARY

=

==

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search