ML20099A066

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Tables 14.2-1 & 14.2-4 of FSAR Will Be Modified to Delete P31.1 from Preoperational Test Program.Encl Draft FSAR Page Changes Will Be Incorporated Into FSAR Rev Scheduled for Oct 1984
ML20099A066
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/10/1984
From: Kemper J
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To: Schwencer A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
OL, NUDOCS 8409130136
Download: ML20099A066 (5)


Text

m 7..

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY 2301 MARKET STREET P.O. BOX 8699 PHILADELPHI A. PA.19101 (215) e41 dooo ENGINEERING AND RE$fARCH DEPARftt(NT SEP 10 $84 Mr. A. Schwencer, Chief Licensing Branch No. 2 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

SUBJECT:

Limerick Generating Station Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 Process Computer Preoperational Tests REF:

J. S. Kemper to A. Schwencer letter dated July 17, 1984 FILE:

GOVT l-1 (NRC)

Dear Mr. Schwencer:

In the reference letter, PECo requested approval to defer the completion of certain Preoperational Tests until after fuel load. After closer examination of the content and purpose of Preoperational Test P31.1, Process Computer System, we have concluded that these testing activities we,uld be properly classified as part of our Acceptance Test program.

We therefore intend to modify Tables 14.2-1 and 14.2-4 of the FSAR to delete P31.'1 from the Preoperational Test Program.

It should he noted that the P31.1 test procedures will be used to conduct all of the computer Acceptance Tests.

The substance of this

-change in test classification.is that.he test results will be reviewed by the cognizant.PECo computer engineer and the Plant Operations Review

-Committee in lieu of the Preoperational Test Review Board.

All portions of the coug:ter system which are nosociated with monitoring reactivity control systams will be tested and verified operational prior to fuel load.

The Rod Worth Minimizer program is tested as part _of Preoperational Test PS6.lB to satisfy Regulatory Guide 1.68, App.

A, Section 1.b. (1).

The core performance software will _ be tested during_ the Power Ascension Program by test STP-13 in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.68, App. A, Section 5.r.

/

l g6l

(

8409130136 840910 PDR ADOCK 05000352 A

PDR

=

~}-

s Mr. A. Schwencer, Chief '

'We believe that the testing program described above for the Process Computer meets and exceeds all-regulatory requirements and that it will allow confinnation of the proper. operation of the Process Computer in a timely manner.

The attached draft FSAR page changes.will be incorporated into the PSAR, exactly as they appear in the attachments, in the revision scheduled Lfor October, 1984.'

Sincerely, SWf EFS/la.

la8784m135 Attachment Copy to:

See. Attached Service List J. Wiggins NRC-Limerick

~

b m

n.

p g '

b.

x.

A

.cc: Judge Lawrence Bremer.

(w/ enclosure)

Judge Peter A. Morris (w/ enclosure)

Judge Richard F. Cole

- (w/ enclosure)

' Troy B. Conner, Jr., Esq.

(w/ enclosure)

Ann P. Hodgdon, Esq..

- (w/erciosure)

Mr. Frank R. Romano

.(w/ enclosure) i

'Mr. Robert L. Anthony (w/ enclosure)

)

Maureen Pis111gan (w/ enclosure) l 2 Charles W. Elliot,- Esq.

(w/ enclosure)

Zori G. Ferkin, Esq.

(w/ enclosure)

~

-Mr. Thomas Gerusky

'(w/ enclosure)

Director, Penna. Emergency (w/ enclosure)

' Management Agency Angus ' R.' Lorve, Esq.

(w/ enclosure)

(w/ enclosure)

David.Werson, Esq..

(w/ enclosure)

Robert J. Sugarman, Esq..

. Martha W. Bush,'Esq.

(w/ enclosure)

Spence W. Perry, Esq.

(w/ enclosure) day M. Gutterrez, Esq.

(w/ enclosure)

. Atomic Safety S Licensing (w/ enclosure).

O'

-Appeal Board Atomic. Safety & t.icensing (w/ enclosure)

Board Panel Docket & Service Section (w/encio ure)

Mr.' dames Wiggins (w/ enclosure)

. Mr. - Timothy R.- S. Car @ bel l (w/ enclosure) l-U L

,~,

^

w.,

k <-

i-pe t

c$.

,y

..r..,

..-,., y,. -,..,.., ~,,,,.,

,.,m,,

,y

+,

... ~..,

DRAFT mS,S,

~

TABLE 14.2-1 (Cont'd)

(Page 2 of 4)

TEST NUMBER TEST TITLE P-30.2(2)

, Control Enclosure Chilled Water System pogp0(ey SyAfg 7 ' bEU5Th P-31.1 P-32.1(1)

Co trol-Room-HVAC System P-32.2 Control Room Isolation and Purge P-33.1-Turbine Enclosure HVAC System P-34.1 Reactor Enclosure HVAC System P-34.2 Refueling Area HVAC System l

P-35.1

-Fuel Pool Cooling / Cleanup System P-37.1 Demineralized Water Transfer System P-39.1 Condensate Demineralizer System

(

P-41.1 Cooling Tower System P-42.1 Circulating Water System P-43.1 Condenser and Air Removal System P-44.1 Condensate System P-45.1 Feedwater System l

P-46.1 Extraction Steam and Feedwater Heater Systems

.P-49.1 Residual Heat Removal System P-50.1 Reactor Core Isolation Cooling System P-51.1 Core Spray System P-52.1 High-Pressure Coolant Injection System P-53.1 Standty Liquid Control System P-54.1 Emergency Service Water System P-55.1 Control Rod Drive Hydraulic System P-56.1 Reactor Manual Control System Rev. 15, 12/82

.j..o LGS FSAR TABLE 14.2-4 (Cont'd)

(Pa~ge 22 of 82) l b.

. System water chillers operate properly.

(Section 9.2.10.2) c.

Flow is verified to each system component.

(Section 9.2.10.2) d.

System alarms operate properly.

(Section'9.2.10.2) c Ns

-Computer System (P-31.1)

DeLetC Unit Sco

'N a.

-1P-3

.1 (Unit I system components)

b..

2P-31.1 Unit 2 system components)

Test-Obiective - The ~

t objective is to, demonstrate the proper operation of computer i(np t/ output logi

. Prerequisites - To the exten nece$sary for performance of this r

(-

test,. construction is complete b<and instrumentation and controls are operable and calibrated. Jhe computer hardware is calibrated, and software is ebugge Test Method - Input sign s to the comp er are either

> transmitted by instal d'd instrumentation (o are simulated.

Acceptance Criter a Compdter outputs operate properly.

(Vendor Testi a.

Specification) be Computer peripheral hardware operate properly.

endor

/'

Test Specification)

,f s'

y (P-32.1)

Contrcl Room HVAC System Unit Scope a.

IP-32.2 (Common system components)

Test Obiective - The test objective is to demonstrate the capability of the control room HVAC_ system to provide air flow and temperature control in the control room by simulated room

-temperature variations.

Rev. 30, 03/84

. _... _, _ _ _.. _., _.. _. _. _.. _ _,.. _ _ _. _ _,