ML20098B571

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Slide Presentation Entitled, Assessment of Scaling Adequacy for 1/20th Scale Test
ML20098B571
Person / Time
Site: River Bend Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/29/1983
From: Corlell R
WASHINGTON, UNIV. OF, SEATTLE, WA
To:
Shared Package
ML20093C471 List:
References
NUDOCS 8409260159
Download: ML20098B571 (9)


Text

. .

.! . e i .

I: - (

ij I ASSESSMENT OF SCALING  ;

4 ADEQUACY FOR 1/20TH

, SCALE TEST I i -

. j SY DR. RICHARD CORCETT

. . UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON a

i i

, PRESENTATION TO I

'l NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BETHESDA, MARYLAND

' s i JUNE 29, 1983 i

l 4

! i G409260159 840910 l j -

PDR ADOCK 05000458 g PDR - ---- -- = - -

l

. . . . . . . . . . , . .. . .......u-. >r.-... ..

l .. .....- . .. a.... - . . . . . . - . -  ;- . - - - -

St OBJECTIVES OF SCALE MODEL FIRE TESTS i , e f

G CRITERIA FOR FIRE / FLAME OCCURANCE

\

IDIFFUSIVE VS PUFF BURNINGl I O IF DIFFUSIVE, PREDICT:

  1. ' FLAME GEOMETRY I  !

8 ASSOCIATED TilERNAL ENVIRONMENT 0

. 4 9

, E.G. T- I, ' h ,

qrad 9 c

~

  • t.

9 8

0

.' )

j s

i 1

s RCC 6/29/83 (.1)

~ ,, . -

.. --1__--m~ . _

. . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -.a . . . - - - . - . - . - - - . - - - - - .. -

---~;s i' .

~

.I.

,. FIRE /Fl.AMECt.ASSIFICdTION . . i

. l l

1 .

9 DIFFUSIVE air .

  • PRIMARY -

DIRECTLY OVER POOL .

1

-e e^--

~

^

,t e ,

r- - H z W ..

-~;

  • SECONDARY -

INSUFFICIENT 0 2 i p Air ,i i

DIRECTLY OVER POOL - FIRE l

(

i

. STABILIZES lilGilER / i /L 4 - -

e.). 7*4..'T ll, vick he v.

l t-t --

^ r

9 PREMIXED - PUFF lluRNING 1 .

I l' ,.

t i

. l 1 I RCC 6/29/83 (2)

__ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . - +, y . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___

1., . . . J . .. -

l k . .*

  • g PRIMARY AND SECONDARY FIRE SCAllNG CONCEPTS ,

j O MOLECULAR TRANSPORT " UNIMPORTANT" j G COMDUSTION IS DIFFUSION - (AS OPPOSED TO RATE-) CONTROLLED ,-

  • Vd L I
e T -4 L/V -L 5 i Ax L y oc. t 5/2

' 2 e

$ IGNITION CRITERION - CRITICAL CONCENTRATION -

i l 0 CONDITIONS FOR VALIDITY I'

  • FULL TURDULEilCE - HASICALLY A SIZE' REQUIREMENT 4
  • NO PRE-MIXING - UBIOUITOUS IGNITION SOURCES,

,. lilGHLY IMPERFECT MIXING 4

i.-

l

, , RCc 6/29/83 (31

. .._.....a.. x . . -. : a . . . " ' ' - ** ~~

t PRIMARY FIRES - SCAllNG MARGIN - -

@ TURBULENCE *

  • WITil IGN. - D EFF > I FT.

CR (PROBABLY LESS FOR ll 7 AT BASELINE FLOW)

  • W/0 IGN, - D CR SLIGitTLY llIGilER i

e CONCENTRATION

  • CRITICAL LOW fi I" "

FUEL EFF .

l

  • CRITICAL LOW " LOCAL AMBIENT" 0 . IF D EFF 2 p .. ,CR t ,

SECONDARY FIRES - SCALING MARGIN

@ PER PRIMARY FIRE ,

l d- @

LEFF } L CR 1 FT.

i k

g s RCC 6/29/83 (10 t

l l -

.<i .

PRIMARY FIRES - CONSEQUENCES OF D EFF

< m 1 FT. .. ,.

I O l.0WERS CRITICAL LOW M pgg( VIS A VIS FULL TURB. SCALING -

EST. ERROR RANGE FOR D,pp 5:: 5"  : 20%

i

. O INCREASES FLAME ilEIGitT l

EST. ERROR RANGE : 30%

i O OvERALL CIRCULATION SLIGilTLY RETARDED

)  ; i i SECONDARY FIRES - CONSEQUENCED OF D EFF < = 1 FT.

4 . ,

O PROBABLY DELAYS PRIMARY + SECONDARY TRANSITION EST. ERROR RANGE : 20% ,,

4 O PROBABLY DELAYS SECONDARY FIRE EXPIRATIort l

l

i EST. ERROR RANGE : 20% SECONDARY FIRE LIrETINE 4

i j l RCC G/29/83 t i,

. , i t \ f . .  ! ' : _

I8!. *

~

'. )

. 6

~ ( -

~

i e0 3

. 8

~ /

9

'. 2

/ -

6 -

.. C C

- R Y

L T

H ) i -

G L I

L L A S M -

  • S Y

\ L O B O A T B

O S i '

R I D

P E

( E V

  • L D R

- G E A E E

'- N L C L S I

B S A E N A C R ih

_ R L l i S P l

. i A T B C G T T S N O O D E N N E Y L X L S V I

B F C /

M A I I S

E B M R O E A .

P

  • - R T N a

P A Y E.

L D 1 T

E F S F N u U' .- .

O P -

  • ,s .

9 9

c. .

. t 1

. .I .Ii;  : 1

~

i.  ; ; sI!l l ' l; ij:! !4

O

-.._.....c___.: +--A----"...... .;.: . 2 . . s- L... : = :a -u "MEMN'

, , O", ~ ~". ,

  • s N $

PRESERVATION.0F T - OVERAl.L CillMNEY' FLOW C00LDOWN . .

9 COLD-WALL BOUNDING EST. OF FLOW ENERGY LOSS i d LN AT =

PD PD F ST ~

3

~ __ _ .c< 1 d ( x/D) A x A x 8 .

REYNOLDS ANALOGY 1

WilERE A x = X-SECTION AREA, D = EFFECTIVE DI AN, P = EFFECTIVE :'ORINE SCAL.ING CONSIDERATIONS . PD/A g i

IS LOW IN H0 DEL BY FACTOR UP TO "SEVERAL." .

. F IS IIIGli l'N MODEL DY SMALLER FACTOR "

ESTIMATESOF(PD/Ay_(F/8) 1/20 PROTOTYPE  !

0102 ,

0.05

~

G CREDIT FOR WALL TEMP. RISE: X(PD/A ) (F/8) bil00LD BE DIVIDED BY

/T1 1/2 V/I o C 1+EfC K .

Js s s ,

\ '

+ r 1

  • N lilERMALLY TillCK t

'v

  • 0(1) r0R PROTOTYPE
  • SCALING REQUIRES CK f3 3 3 *C L RCC 6/29/83 (7)

I

SUMMARY

j . .

l . .1/20TH SCALE TEST PROVIDES A MODESTLY CONSERVATIVE .

i '

REPRESENTATIONOFTHEEXPECJEDTHERMALENVIRONMENT

!' (RESdLTINGFROMDIFFUSIONFLAMES) IN A MK III CONTAINMENT -

i .- FOR THE,NO SPRAY CASE.

1

.i k

I  ?

.] <

i

~1

, 1-1 i .

l .

.., .~

, e h

t l .

i l  !

! i

.l

! 1, 1

J $

i  ; .

l 1

l .

e

.i l

.-* 1 i

f j

i_ . . . . . . _ . _ .. _. . . . .__. --- . - - -

I. ,.. ,. .. .-, , _ , - , - , - - - - , , . - , . , - , -.-._ --..,,----- ..- .,, . --,_..- .,.-. -

. , . - . . . - - . . . - . . . -